# To What Extent Does the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Apply during a Procurement Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A precise, multi-faceted geometric structure represents institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. Its sharp angles denote high-fidelity execution and price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, symbolizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-framework.jpg)

![An opaque principal's operational framework half-sphere interfaces a translucent digital asset derivatives sphere, revealing implied volatility. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol, enabling private quotation within the market microstructure and deep liquidity pool for a robust Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-13.jpg)

## Concept

The [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) represents a system of structured interaction, governed by explicit rules and implicit expectations. Within this framework, the [implied covenant](https://prime.greeks.live/area/implied-covenant/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of good faith and fair dealing functions as a foundational protocol, an unwritten yet universally understood constraint on behavior. It exists to ensure the operational integrity of the transaction, obligating each party to act in a manner that preserves the other’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the agreement.

This principle is not an afterthought; it is embedded in the very logic of contractual relationships, acting as a safeguard against conduct that, while not explicitly forbidden by the letter of the procurement documents, fundamentally undermines their purpose. The covenant addresses the reality that no contract can anticipate every possible contingency or form of opportunistic behavior.

> The covenant of good faith and fair dealing operates as an implied term in every contract, mandating that parties act honestly and not interfere with the other’s ability to receive the contract’s benefits.

Its application begins where the explicit text ends, filling the gaps to prevent actions like evasion or deliberate non-cooperation. The core function of this covenant is to protect the reasonable expectations of the parties. When a bidder submits a proposal, they do so with the expectation of a fair evaluation based on the stated criteria. When a [procuring entity](https://prime.greeks.live/question/in-procuring-a-complex-saas-platform-how-should-an-rfp-balance-technical-requirements-with-vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) solicits bids, it does so with the expectation of receiving bona fide offers.

The covenant transforms these expectations into an enforceable duty. It demands that discretion, a necessary component of any complex procurement, is exercised in a manner consistent with the shared commercial purpose. Actions that are technically compliant but are executed with the intent to subvert the process or deny a party their rightful opportunity can trigger a breach of this implied duty.

![A pleated, fan-like structure embodying market microstructure and liquidity aggregation converges with sharp, crystalline forms, symbolizing high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This abstract visualizes RFQ protocols optimizing multi-leg spreads and managing implied volatility within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## The Covenant’s Systemic Role in Procurement

In the architecture of procurement, the covenant of [good faith](https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and [fair dealing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/fair-dealing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is best understood as a system-level regulator. It prevents the entire process from devolving into a series of adversarial exploits. Without this implicit agreement, parties could use technicalities and ambiguities in the procurement documents to gain unearned advantages, thereby destroying the trust necessary for efficient market operations.

The covenant’s power lies in its context-dependent application; what constitutes “good faith” is measured against the specific circumstances of the procurement, the industry norms, and the relationship between the parties. This flexibility is both its strength and a source of legal complexity.

A crucial distinction exists between the covenant of good faith and a claim of outright bad faith. The implied covenant is breached when a party’s actions, even if not malicious, are inconsistent with the contract’s purpose and deprive the other party of the value they expected to receive. It is a standard of [commercial reasonableness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercial-reasonableness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

For instance, a procuring entity might not be acting with malice when it repeatedly fails to provide necessary information to a bidder, but such negligence can still constitute a breach of the implied covenant if it hinders the bidder’s ability to perform. This systemic function ensures that the procurement process remains a viable mechanism for achieving commercial objectives, rather than a minefield of procedural gamesmanship.

![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Foundational Principles of Application

The enforcement of the implied covenant rests on several core principles that give it substance within the procurement context. These principles form the analytical framework that courts and arbitrators use to assess whether a party’s conduct has crossed the line.

- **Upholding Reasonable Expectations** ▴ The primary function of the covenant is to ensure that the foundational assumptions of the parties are respected. A bidder reasonably expects that their confidential pricing information will not be used to solicit a lower bid from a competitor ([bid shopping](https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-shopping/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)), even if the RFP document does not explicitly forbid it.

- **Prohibiting Evasion and Subterfuge** ▴ The covenant prevents parties from using clever or evasive means to avoid their substantive obligations. A procuring entity that creates [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) designed to be insurmountable for all but one pre-selected bidder would be violating the spirit, if not the letter, of a competitive bidding process.

- **Mandating Cooperation** ▴ The covenant imposes an affirmative duty to cooperate when necessary for the other party to perform. If a bidder requires site access to prepare an accurate proposal for a construction project, the procuring entity has an implied duty to provide that access in a timely manner. Willful or negligent interference with performance can constitute a breach.

- **Constraining Discretion** ▴ Procurement processes inherently grant discretion to the soliciting party in evaluating bids and making an award. The covenant requires that this discretion be exercised reasonably and not arbitrarily or for a purpose outside the scope of the contract.

![A metallic blade signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing, piercing a complex Prime RFQ orb. Within, market microstructure, algorithmic trading, and liquidity pools are visualized](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-precision.jpg)

![Abstract composition features two intersecting, sharp-edged planes—one dark, one light—representing distinct liquidity pools or multi-leg spreads. Translucent spherical elements, symbolizing digital asset derivatives and price discovery, balance on this intersection, reflecting complex market microstructure and optimal RFQ protocol execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

Navigating the procurement landscape requires a strategic understanding of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. For both procuring entities and bidders, the covenant is not merely a legal concept but a critical variable that shapes risk, strategy, and outcomes. A proactive approach to managing the obligations of good faith can create a more efficient, defensible, and ultimately more successful procurement system. This involves designing processes and behaviors that align with the covenant’s principles from the outset, rather than reacting to claims of breach after the fact.

![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

## A Procuring Entity’s Defensive Architecture

For a procuring entity, the primary strategy is to construct a procurement process that is inherently fair and transparent, thereby minimizing the grounds for a potential breach claim. This involves building an operational framework where discretion is guided by clear, objective, and consistently applied standards. The goal is to create a record of conduct that demonstrates a commitment to the spirit of the competition.

A robust defensive architecture includes several key components:

- **Clarity in Solicitation Documents** ▴ The Request for Proposal (RFP) or Invitation to Bid (ITB) should be as clear and unambiguous as possible. Evaluation criteria, weighting, and the overall process timeline should be explicitly stated. Ambiguity is a primary source of disputes and can create the appearance that the entity is reserving undue discretion for itself.

- **Structured Communication Protocols** ▴ All communications with bidders should be managed through a structured and equitable process. A formal Q&A period where all questions and answers are shared with all participants prevents any single bidder from gaining an informational advantage. Ex parte communications should be strictly prohibited and logged if they occur.

- **Consistent Application of Rules** ▴ The rules of the procurement must be applied uniformly to all bidders. Waiving a requirement for one bidder but not another, or allowing a late submission from a favored participant, are classic examples of conduct that can support a claim of breach.

- **Objective Evaluation and Documentation** ▴ The evaluation of bids should be conducted by a committee and based strictly on the pre-disclosed criteria. Scoring sheets, evaluator notes, and committee deliberations should be documented to create a clear audit trail demonstrating how the final decision was reached. This documentation is a critical defense against claims of arbitrary or biased selection.

> By embedding fairness into the procurement process itself, a procuring entity can strategically mitigate the risk of litigation and enhance its reputation as a reliable business partner.

![Central teal-lit mechanism with radiating pathways embodies a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It signifies RFQ protocol processing, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread trades, enabling atomic settlement within market microstructure via quantitative analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Strategic Considerations for Bidders

For bidders, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing provides a shield against unfair treatment. A strategic bidder understands their rights under the covenant and is vigilant for signs of potential breach. This awareness allows them to protect their interests and make informed decisions about whether to continue in a procurement process that appears flawed.

Key strategic points for bidders include:

- **Thorough Diligence on the RFP** ▴ Bidders should scrutinize the procurement documents for any signs of unfairness, such as overly restrictive specifications that seem tailored to a specific competitor or evaluation criteria that are vague and subjective. Raising these issues during the official Q&A period can be a strategic move to either force clarification or create a record for a future protest.

- **Documenting All Interactions** ▴ Maintaining a clear record of all communications, submissions, and observations is critical. If a procuring entity fails to provide requested data, provides conflicting information, or engages in questionable conduct, a contemporaneous record is invaluable evidence.

- **Identifying Red Flags of Breach** ▴ Experienced bidders learn to recognize patterns of behavior that may indicate a breach of the covenant. These can include unusually long delays in the evaluation process, a lack of transparency, evasive answers to legitimate questions, or rumors of a preferred bidder.

- **Understanding Available Remedies** ▴ A bidder should understand the potential remedies before escalating a dispute. These can range from a formal bid protest, which might seek to have the procurement process re-run, to a lawsuit seeking recovery of bid preparation costs or, in rare cases, lost profits.

The following table compares the application of the implied covenant in public versus private sector procurement, highlighting key strategic differences.

### Table 1 ▴ Implied Covenant Application in Public vs. Private Procurement

| Aspect | Public Procurement | Private Procurement |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Governing Framework | Heavily regulated by statutes (e.g. Federal Acquisition Regulation), which often codify principles of fairness and competition. | Governed primarily by common law principles of contract law and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). |
| Standard of Review | Courts often give deference to government agencies’ decisions, but will intervene if conduct is found to be arbitrary, capricious, or illegal. | Courts apply general contract principles. Parties have greater freedom to define the terms of their engagement, but the implied covenant still applies. |
| Protest Mechanisms | Formal bid protest mechanisms are typically available (e.g. through the Government Accountability Office or Court of Federal Claims). | No formal protest system. Recourse is typically through direct negotiation or litigation. |
| Remedies | Remedies may be limited by statute and often include bid preparation and protest costs. Lost profits are difficult to recover. | Remedies can be broader, potentially including expectation damages (lost profits) if a contract was effectively formed and then breached. |

![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

![Abstract geometric forms portray a dark circular digital asset derivative or liquidity pool on a light plane. Sharp lines and a teal surface with a triangular shadow symbolize market microstructure, RFQ protocol execution, and algorithmic trading precision for institutional grade block trades and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

The practical application of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing within a procurement process moves beyond theoretical principles into a granular analysis of conduct. For legal and business professionals, understanding the mechanics of how the covenant is breached, proven, and remedied is essential for managing risk and enforcing rights. The execution phase of this analysis requires a deep dive into the specific actions that transform a competitive procurement into a flawed one.

![A reflective disc, symbolizing a Prime RFQ data layer, supports a translucent teal sphere with Yin-Yang, representing Quantitative Analysis and Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. A sleek mechanical arm signifies High-Fidelity Execution and Algorithmic Trading via RFQ Protocol, within a Principal's Operational Framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-principal-trading-infrastructure-automated-liquidity-aggregation-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## The Anatomy of a Breach in Procurement

A breach of the implied covenant is not always a single, dramatic act. It often manifests as a pattern of conduct that, when viewed in its totality, reveals a failure to deal fairly. The following are specific, actionable examples of conduct that courts have scrutinized as potential breaches during the procurement lifecycle.

![A precision institutional interface features a vertical display, control knobs, and a sharp element. This RFQ Protocol system ensures High-Fidelity Execution and optimal Price Discovery, facilitating Liquidity Aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-interface.jpg)

## Pre-Award Conduct Violating the Covenant

During the bidding and evaluation phase, the procuring entity holds most of the power, and its actions are the most common source of breaches.

- **Bid Shopping** ▴ This classic form of bad faith occurs when a procuring entity uses the price of one bidder to pressure other bidders to lower their prices. It fundamentally undermines the integrity of sealed bidding and treats a bidder’s confidential pricing as a mere negotiating tactic rather than a firm offer.

- **Arbitrary or Undisclosed Evaluation Criteria** ▴ A procuring entity breaches the covenant when it evaluates proposals based on criteria that were not disclosed in the RFP. For example, awarding a contract to a local firm based on a preference for local businesses, when no such preference was stated in the solicitation documents, would be a breach of fairness to non-local bidders who spent resources preparing a bid.

- **Willful Failure to Provide Information** ▴ As noted earlier, the duty to cooperate can be breached through inaction. If a procuring entity possesses information critical to the preparation of an accurate bid (e.g. subsurface soil reports for a construction project) and withholds it, it deprives bidders of the ability to compete on a level playing field.

- **Favoritism and Pre-Selection** ▴ The entire procurement process can be a sham if the procuring entity has already chosen a winner. Evidence of this can include designing specifications that only one bidder can meet, holding private meetings with a favored bidder, or manipulating scores to ensure a desired outcome.

![A dynamic visual representation of an institutional trading system, featuring a central liquidity aggregation engine emitting a controlled order flow through dedicated market infrastructure. This illustrates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery within a private quotation environment for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-os-driving-high-fidelity-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives-through-optimized-rfq-protocols-and-smart-order-routing.jpg)

## Post-Award, Pre-Performance Conduct

Even after a bidder has been selected, the covenant applies to the transition from bid to final contract.

- **Imposing New, Onerous Terms** ▴ If a procuring entity selects a bidder and then attempts to force them to accept material terms and conditions that were not included in the original RFP, it can be seen as a breach. The winning bidder has a reasonable expectation to contract on the terms originally proposed.

- **Unreasonable Delay in Award** ▴ An unexplained and lengthy delay between the selection of a winning bidder and the final execution of the contract can also breach the covenant, especially if the delay causes the bidder’s costs to increase or forces them to miss other opportunities.

> A breach is ultimately a failure of process; it occurs when a procuring entity’s actions are inconsistent with the foundational promise of a fair and equitable competition.

![Abstract geometric forms converge around a central RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Transparent elements represent real-time market data and algorithmic execution paths, while solid panels denote principal liquidity and robust counterparty relationships](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Jurisdictional Nuances in Covenant Application

The extent to which the implied covenant applies during procurement is heavily dependent on state law. There is no single, uniform standard across the United States, and this variation is a critical factor in risk assessment and litigation strategy. Some jurisdictions have robustly applied the covenant to pre-award conduct, while others are more restrictive.

The following table provides a comparative analysis of the covenant’s application in several key commercial jurisdictions.

### Table 2 ▴ Comparative Jurisdictional Application of the Implied Covenant in Procurement

| Jurisdiction | Scope of Application | Key Principles and Landmark Cases | Strategic Implications |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Delaware | Broad application. Delaware courts have been willing to apply the covenant to pre-contractual negotiations, particularly where parties have made a preliminary agreement to negotiate in good faith. | Courts focus on protecting the “fruits of the contract” and preventing frustration of purpose. A party can breach by exercising contractual discretion in a way that contravenes the parties’ reasonable expectations. | Parties entering into preliminary agreements or letters of intent in Delaware must be acutely aware that a duty of good faith may attach earlier and more strongly than in other states. |
| New York | More restrictive application. New York law is hesitant to apply the covenant before a binding contract is formed. It cannot be used to create new obligations that are not present in the contract itself. | The covenant is used to ensure that a party does not act in a way that would destroy the “right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.” (Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.). However, it does not imply an obligation to be reasonable in all actions. | In New York, a claim for breach of the covenant must be tied very closely to a specific, existing contractual promise. It is less effective as a standalone claim for unfair dealing during the negotiation phase. |
| California | Broad application, similar to Delaware. The covenant is implied in every contract and requires that neither party do anything to injure the right of the other to receive the benefits of the agreement. | California courts have found a breach in cases of evasion, subterfuge, and abuse of discretionary power. The standard is objective, looking at what a reasonable person would consider fair. | The broad scope in California means that procuring entities must be particularly careful in how they conduct evaluations and communications, as claims of unfairness find a more receptive legal environment. |
| Federal Government Contracting | Strong application. The government has an implied duty to treat contractors fairly and in good faith. This includes the duty to cooperate and the duty not to hinder performance. | Cases at the Court of Federal Claims and Boards of Contract Appeals frequently address this duty. A high burden of proof is required to show the government acted in bad faith (requiring malicious intent), but a breach of the implied covenant (hindering performance) has a lower threshold. | Contractors with the federal government have a well-established basis to claim breach of the implied covenant, but must navigate a specific and complex administrative and legal system to do so. |

![A transparent sphere, bisected by dark rods, symbolizes an RFQ protocol's core. This represents multi-leg spread execution within a high-fidelity market microstructure for institutional grade digital asset derivatives, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## References

- Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 205. American Law Institute, 1981.

- Solosky, Nicholas T. “Government Contracting 101 ▴ Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.” The Federal Government Contracts & Procurement Blog, 25 Apr. 2017.

- “Implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.” Wex Legal Dictionary, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, Mar. 2022.

- Cadden & Fuller LLP. “What is implied covenant of good faith and fair dealings?” 4 Mar. 2023.

- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. The Paul Armstrong Co. 263 N.Y. 79, 188 N.E. 163. New York Court of Appeals, 1933.

- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States, 596 F.3d 817. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2010.

- Perillo, Joseph M. “Abuse of Rights ▴ A Pervasive Legal Concept.” Pacific Law Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, 1995, pp. 37-97.

- Burton, Steven J. “Breach of Contract and the Common Law Duty to Perform in Good Faith.” Harvard Law Review, vol. 94, no. 2, 1980, pp. 369-404.

![A large, smooth sphere, a textured metallic sphere, and a smaller, swirling sphere rest on an angular, dark, reflective surface. This visualizes a principal liquidity pool, complex structured product, and dynamic volatility surface, representing high-fidelity execution within an institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimized-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Reflection

Understanding the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is more than a legal exercise; it is an upgrade to a company’s operational intelligence. Viewing this covenant not as a threat but as a fundamental protocol for market integrity allows for a strategic shift. It moves an organization from a reactive, defensive posture to a proactive stance that builds resilience and reputation.

The principles of fairness, cooperation, and reasonable conduct are not liabilities to be managed but assets to be cultivated. They are the very mechanisms that ensure the long-term viability and efficiency of the procurement systems upon which all complex commerce depends.

![A sleek, high-fidelity beige device with reflective black elements and a control point, set against a dynamic green-to-blue gradient sphere. This abstract representation symbolizes institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery within market microstructure, powered by an intelligence layer for alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-terminal-system.jpg)

## Systemic Integrity as a Strategic Asset

A procurement process that consistently operates with a high degree of fairness becomes a strategic asset. It attracts higher-quality bidders, reduces transaction costs associated with disputes, and accelerates the pace of business. The ultimate reflection for any organization is to examine its own procurement framework. Does it function as a transparent system designed to identify the best value, or has it become a complex web of rules that can be manipulated?

The covenant of good faith and fair dealing serves as the ultimate auditor of that question. Its principles provide a clear lens through which to assess and refine the core architecture of how an organization engages with its partners, transforming a legal obligation into a competitive advantage.

![A translucent teal triangle, an RFQ protocol interface with target price visualization, rises from radiating multi-leg spread components. This depicts Prime RFQ driven liquidity aggregation for institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-driving-rfq-protocol-enhanced-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, dark teal institutional-grade mechanism reveals an internal beige interface, precisely deploying a metallic, arrow-etched component. This signifies high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement and optimized price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads, ensuring minimal slippage and robust capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/quantitative-finance-driven-rfq-workflow-for-best-execution-in-digital-assets.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/implied-covenant/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-segmented sphere symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives. One quadrant shows a dynamic implied volatility surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-management.jpg)

## Implied Covenant

Meaning ▴ The Implied Covenant represents an unstated, fundamental expectation of good faith and fair dealing inherent in every contractual relationship, even when not explicitly articulated. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/in-procuring-a-complex-saas-platform-how-should-an-rfp-balance-technical-requirements-with-vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. Metallic trusses depict market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## Procuring Entity

A successful SaaS RFP architects a symbiotic relationship where technical efficacy is sustained by verifiable vendor stability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/fair-dealing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex sphere, split blue implied volatility surface and white, balances on a beam. A transparent sphere acts as fulcrum](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-balancing-liquidity.jpg)

## Fair Dealing

Meaning ▴ Fair Dealing denotes the fundamental principle of equitable and non-discriminatory treatment afforded to all market participants within a trading system, ensuring that institutional order flow is processed without bias or preferential access. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## Good Faith

Meaning ▴ Good Faith, in a financial and operational context, denotes the adherence to honest intent and absence of fraudulent or deceptive conduct during contractual agreements and transactional processes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercial-reasonableness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. An elongated panel displays dynamic numeric readouts, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and real-time market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-options.jpg)

## Commercial Reasonableness

Meaning ▴ Commercial reasonableness refers to the standard by which a transaction or action is judged to be consistent with prevailing market practices, industry norms, and sound business judgment, particularly concerning pricing, terms, and execution methodology. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-shopping/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, modular mechanical assembly illustrates an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. Reflective elements and distinct quadrants symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Bid Shopping

Meaning ▴ Bid shopping defines the strategic practice of leveraging a price quotation received from one liquidity provider to solicit a more competitive price from an alternative counterparty for the identical financial instrument and size. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A scratched blue sphere, representing market microstructure and liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives, encases a smooth teal sphere, symbolizing a private quotation via RFQ protocol. An institutional-grade structure suggests a Prime RFQ facilitating high-fidelity execution and managing counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a>

**Tags:** [Restatement of Contracts](https://options.greeks.live/area/restatement-of-contracts/), [Uniform Commercial Code](https://options.greeks.live/area/uniform-commercial-code/), [Commercial Reasonableness](https://options.greeks.live/area/commercial-reasonableness/), [Government Contracting](https://options.greeks.live/area/government-contracting/), [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/), [Legal Duties in Bidding](https://options.greeks.live/area/legal-duties-in-bidding/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Distinguishes the Rationality Test from Commercial Reasonableness?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-distinguishes-the-rationality-test-from-commercial-reasonableness/)
![A sleek, metallic multi-lens device with glowing blue apertures symbolizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine. Its precision optics enable real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution, facilitating automated price discovery and aggregated inquiry within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

The rationality test assesses a decision's internal logic, while commercial reasonableness benchmarks an action against external market norms.

- 
### [How Can an Owner’s Discretion Clause Be Challenged in an Rfp Dispute?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-owners-discretion-clause-be-challenged-in-an-rfp-dispute/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency. A metallic button suggests precise private quotation control.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

Challenging an owner's discretion clause involves proving the exercise of that discretion was arbitrary, in bad faith, or procedurally flawed.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Exceptions to the Enforceability of a Liability Disclaimer in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-exceptions-to-the-enforceability-of-a-liability-disclaimer-in-an-rfp/)
![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

Liability disclaimers in RFPs are subject to exceptions for fraudulent misrepresentation, gross negligence, and violations of public policy.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Traditional Rfp and an Innovation Challenge?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-traditional-rfp-and-an-innovation-challenge/)
![A translucent, faceted sphere, representing a digital asset derivative block trade, traverses a precision-engineered track. This signifies high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol, optimizing liquidity aggregation, price discovery, and capital efficiency within institutional market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-high-fidelity-execution-protocol-prime-os-path.jpg)

An RFP procures a known solution against fixed requirements; an innovation challenge discovers a novel solution for a complex problem.

- 
### [In What Ways Does an Ambiguous RFP Affect Long-Term Vendor Relationships and Project Success?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-does-an-ambiguous-rfp-affect-long-term-vendor-relationships-and-project-success/)
![A multi-layered, institutional-grade device, poised with a beige base, dark blue core, and an angled mint green intelligence layer. This signifies a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and capital efficiency within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-intelligence.jpg)

An ambiguous RFP fundamentally undermines project success and vendor relationships by creating a foundation of uncertainty and mistrust.

- 
### [Under What Circumstances Can Bidders Successfully Sue for Lost Profits after an Rfp Is Withdrawn?](https://options.greeks.live/question/under-what-circumstances-can-bidders-successfully-sue-for-lost-profits-after-an-rfp-is-withdrawn/)
![A central RFQ aggregation engine radiates segments, symbolizing distinct liquidity pools and market makers. This depicts multi-dealer RFQ protocol orchestration for high-fidelity price discovery in digital asset derivatives, highlighting diverse counterparty risk profiles and algorithmic pricing grids.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/centralized-digital-asset-rfq-orchestration-for-multi-venue-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-counterparties.jpg)

A bidder may sue for lost profits if it can prove the RFP's withdrawal breached an implied contract for a fair bidding process.

- 
### [What Are the Key Legal Differences and Contractual Implications of Responding to an Rfq versus an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-legal-differences-and-contractual-implications-of-responding-to-an-rfq-versus-an-rfp/)
![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

An RFQ is a price-focused request for specific goods, while an RFP is a value-focused solicitation for complex solutions.

- 
### [What Are the Consequences for a Bidder Who Fails to Acknowledge a Material Rfp Amendment?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-consequences-for-a-bidder-who-fails-to-acknowledge-a-material-rfp-amendment/)
![A sphere split into light and dark segments, revealing a luminous core. This encapsulates the precise Request for Quote RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, highlighting high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and advanced market microstructure within aggregated liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

Failure to acknowledge a material RFP amendment results in disqualification, revealing a systemic risk in the bidder's operational protocol.

- 
### [Can an Rfp Labeled as Non-Binding Inadvertently Become Legally Binding through the Parties’ Conduct?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-an-rfp-labeled-as-non-binding-inadvertently-become-legally-binding-through-the-parties-conduct/)
![A spherical, eye-like structure, an Institutional Prime RFQ, projects a sharp, focused beam. This visualizes high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling block trades and multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency and best execution across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-block-trade-execution.jpg)

A "non-binding" RFP becomes legally binding when the issuer's conduct creates a reasonable expectation of commitment upon which a bidder relies.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "To What Extent Does the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Apply during a Procurement Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/to-what-extent-does-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing-apply-during-a-procurement-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/to-what-extent-does-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing-apply-during-a-procurement-process/"
    },
    "headline": "To What Extent Does the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Apply during a Procurement Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The implied covenant of good faith mandates that parties in a procurement process act fairly to preserve the contract's intended benefits. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/to-what-extent-does-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing-apply-during-a-procurement-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T08:05:49+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T08:05:51+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract composition illustrates a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives ecosystem. A central transparent sphere, embodying dynamic implied volatility and aggregated price discovery, balances on a precision execution rail. This signifies a Principal's commitment to high-fidelity execution and robust risk management for multi-leg spreads and large block trades. The integrated architecture, featuring a prime brokerage gateway and an efficient liquidity pipeline, leverages advanced RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement within a high-performance Crypto Derivatives OS."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Bid Shopping",
        "Breach of Contract",
        "Commercial Reasonableness",
        "Contract Law",
        "Contract Negotiation",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Fair Dealing",
        "Good Faith",
        "Government Contracting",
        "Implied Covenant",
        "Legal Duties in Bidding",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Restatement of Contracts",
        "RFP Process",
        "Uniform Commercial Code"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/to-what-extent-does-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing-apply-during-a-procurement-process/
