# What Are the Best Practices for Weighting Price in an Rfp Scoring Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A clear glass sphere, symbolizing a precise RFQ block trade, rests centrally on a sophisticated Prime RFQ platform. The metallic surface suggests intricate market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery for institutional grade trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-2.jpg)

![Luminous blue drops on geometric planes depict institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. Large spheres represent atomic settlement of block trades and aggregated inquiries, while smaller droplets signify granular market microstructure data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-driving-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Concept

The construction of a Request for Proposal (RFP) scoring mechanism represents a foundational act of organizational strategy. It is the architectural design of a value discovery system, an engine calibrated to identify not merely the lowest bidder, but the partner that offers the most advantageous combination of capability, reliability, and lifecycle cost. The gravitational pull of the [initial purchase price](https://prime.greeks.live/question/does-the-optimal-bidder-disclosure-strategy-change-materially-between-a-stock-purchase-and-an-asset-purchase/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is immense and undeniable; yet, a sophisticated procurement function understands that this single data point is but one input in a complex, multi-variable equation that defines true value. An overemphasis on price can lead to a selection that fulfills budgetary mandates in the short term while introducing significant operational friction and unforeseen expenses over the lifecycle of the product or service.

A truly robust evaluation framework moves beyond simplistic price-first methodologies. It integrates the financial component into a holistic assessment system, giving it a deliberate and justifiable weight relative to other critical factors. These factors can encompass technical merit, implementation expertise, service quality, and the vendor’s long-term viability. The central challenge lies in quantifying these diverse elements, transforming both qualitative and quantitative inputs into a standardized, defensible, and repeatable scoring system.

This process requires a clear articulation of the organization’s strategic priorities before any proposals are even solicited. The weighting assigned to price is a direct reflection of these priorities. For a commodity purchase, price might rightly command a higher weight. For a complex, mission-critical system, factors like technical superiority and support infrastructure will demand greater prominence in the evaluation calculus.

> A successful RFP scoring process is built upon a foundation of clearly defined strategic objectives that dictate the relative importance of price within a comprehensive value framework.

The spectrum of [price weighting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) models extends from straightforward percentage allocations to more dynamic and nuanced formulas. The simplest method, a direct weighted score, assigns a specific percentage of the total score to price. Best practices often suggest a weight for price in the range of 20-30% to ensure a balanced evaluation that prevents cost from disproportionately influencing the outcome. More advanced models, however, seek to contextualize price.

For instance, a price-to-quality ratio can be employed to measure the “value for money” offered by each proponent, effectively calculating the cost per unit of technical quality. This reframes the conversation from “who is cheapest?” to “who offers the most capability for the cost?”

Ultimately, the goal of any RFP scoring architecture is to create a transparent, equitable, and analytically sound process. It must provide all proponents with a clear understanding of the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) while furnishing the internal [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) with a structured framework to mitigate subjective bias and arrive at a decision that is demonstrably in the best long-term interest of the organization. The weighting of price is the control valve in this system, and its setting determines the very nature of the value the organization chooses to pursue.

![A complex, intersecting arrangement of sleek, multi-colored blades illustrates institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols, aggregating dark liquidity, and enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/sophisticated-multi-asset-rfq-architecture-visualizing-institutional-digital-derivatives-execution-liquidity-aggregation-and-prime-os-orchestration-for-high-fidelity-performance.jpg)

![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework for weighting price in an RFP requires moving from abstract principles to concrete, defensible methodologies. The selection of a specific scoring model is a strategic choice that shapes the outcome of the procurement process. An organization must select the model that best aligns with the specific nature of the purchase and its overarching strategic goals. Three principal models provide a spectrum of sophistication ▴ the [Linear Weighted Average](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-pre-trade-models-account-for-non-linear-market-impact/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the Price-to-Quality Ratio, and the comprehensive [Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO) analysis.

![A sophisticated, illuminated device representing an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. Its glowing interface indicates active RFQ protocol execution, displaying high-fidelity execution status and price discovery for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution-1.jpg)

## The Linear Weighted Average Model

The most common and straightforward approach is the Linear [Weighted Average](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-latency-jitter-be-a-more-powerful-predictor-than-average-latency/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model. In this system, each evaluation category, including price, is assigned a percentage weight. These weights must sum to 100%.

Each proposal is scored within each category (e.g. on a scale of 1 to 100), and the score is then multiplied by the category’s weight to produce a weighted score. The total score for a proposal is the sum of all its weighted scores.

For price, the scoring is typically inverted. The lowest price receives the maximum possible points for the price category, and all other proposals receive a score that is prorated relative to the lowest bid. The formula is often ▴ 

_[Price Score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) = (Lowest Bid Price / Proponent’s Bid Price) Maximum Price Points_

While this model is transparent and easy to implement, its primary strategic limitation is its rigidity. It can sometimes create a situation where a small price difference results in a significant point differential, potentially overshadowing substantial, albeit harder-to-quantify, differences in technical quality or service levels.

![A spherical Liquidity Pool is bisected by a metallic diagonal bar, symbolizing an RFQ Protocol and its Market Microstructure. Imperfections on the bar represent Slippage challenges in High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization-within-principals-market-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Illustrative Weighted Average Calculation

Consider an RFP where the technical criteria are weighted at 70% and price is weighted at 30%. The maximum score is 100.

| Vendor | Technical Score (out of 100) | Weighted Technical Score (Score 0.70) | Bid Price | Price Score (Calculated) | Weighted Price Score (Score 0.30) | Total Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor A | 95 | 66.5 | $100,000 | 100.0 | 30.0 | 96.5 |
| Vendor B | 85 | 59.5 | $90,000 | 111.1 (Capped at 100) | 30.0 (Recalculated from lowest price) | 92.1 |
| Vendor C | 88 | 61.6 | $90,000 | 100.0 (Lowest Price) | 30.0 | 91.6 |

_Note ▴ In the above table, Vendor C has the lowest price and thus receives the maximum price score. Vendor A, despite a higher price, wins due to its superior technical score. Vendor B’s price score is calculated relative to the lowest bid. This demonstrates how the weighting system balances the two factors._

![Beige and teal angular modular components precisely connect on black, symbolizing critical system integration for a Principal's operational framework. This represents seamless interoperability within a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution, efficient price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-os-interop.jpg)

## The Price-to-Quality Ratio Model

A more sophisticated strategic approach involves calculating a price-to-quality or quality-to-price ratio. This method seeks to identify the proposal that offers the best “bang for the buck.” After the technical evaluation is complete and each proposal has a final technical score, that score is divided by the proposed price. The resulting figure represents the number of “quality points” the organization receives for each dollar spent.

This model is particularly effective for procurements where functionality and performance are paramount, but budget is still a significant constraint. It shifts the focus from pure cost to value efficiency. A key prerequisite for this model is a robust and granular technical scoring rubric, as the validity of the final ratio is entirely dependent on the accuracy of the quality assessment.

![Precision metallic pointers converge on a central blue mechanism. This symbolizes Market Microstructure of Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, depicting High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ protocols, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Atomic Settlement for Multi-Leg Spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-precision-execution.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership a Strategic Imperative

The most comprehensive strategic framework for evaluating the financial component of an RFP is the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) model. This approach fundamentally redefines “price.” It expands the concept from the initial [purchase price](https://prime.greeks.live/area/purchase-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to include all direct and indirect costs associated with an asset or service over its entire lifecycle. A [TCO analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) provides a far more accurate picture of the long-term financial implications of a procurement decision.

> By analyzing the full lifecycle of costs, the Total Cost of Ownership model provides a true financial measure of a proposal’s value beyond its initial price tag.

Implementing a [TCO model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires a disciplined, data-driven approach. The procurement team must identify and quantify all relevant cost categories. These typically include:

- **Acquisition Costs** ▴ The initial purchase price, including taxes, shipping, and installation fees.

- **[Operating Costs](https://prime.greeks.live/area/operating-costs/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The ongoing expenses required to use the asset, such as energy consumption, consumables, and software licensing fees.

- **Maintenance and Repair Costs** ▴ Scheduled maintenance, warranty costs, and the projected cost of repairs over the asset’s life.

- **Training and Support Costs** ▴ The cost of training staff to use the new product or service and any ongoing technical support fees.

- **Transition and Integration Costs** ▴ The costs associated with switching from a previous system, including data migration and integration with existing enterprise systems.

- **Disposal Costs** ▴ The costs associated with decommissioning and disposing of the asset at the end of its useful life, minus any residual or resale value.

By calculating the TCO for each proposal, the evaluation committee can compare the true long-term costs of each option. A proposal with a low initial price might reveal a much higher TCO due to exorbitant maintenance or operating costs, making it a less attractive option than a proposal with a higher upfront cost but a lower overall TCO. This strategic lens is indispensable for high-value, long-term investments like enterprise software, manufacturing equipment, or long-term service contracts.

![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![A sleek, dark metallic surface features a cylindrical module with a luminous blue top, embodying a Prime RFQ control for RFQ protocol initiation. This institutional-grade interface enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives block trades, ensuring private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a sophisticated [RFP scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and price weighting strategy transforms theoretical models into a rigorous, operational system for decision-making. This phase demands meticulous planning, quantitative discipline, and a commitment to procedural integrity. It is here that the architectural blueprint designed in the strategy phase is constructed into a functioning evaluation engine. The process can be broken down into a clear operational playbook, supported by robust quantitative modeling and predictive analysis.

![A sophisticated metallic instrument, a precision gauge, indicates a calibrated reading, essential for RFQ protocol execution. Its intricate scales symbolize price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighting Calibration

A successful execution hinges on a systematic, multi-step process. Each step builds upon the last to ensure the final weighting is both justifiable and aligned with strategic intent.

- **Define Strategic Objectives and Procurement Type** ▴ Before any weights are assigned, the evaluation committee must achieve consensus on the primary goal of the procurement. Is the objective to acquire a standard commodity at the lowest possible cost, or is it to secure a long-term strategic partner for a complex, evolving need? The answer to this question is the single most important determinant of the price weight. A commodity purchase might justify a price weight of 40-50%, while a strategic partnership might see price weighted at 20-30% or even lower.

- **Establish Comprehensive Evaluation Criteria** ▴ The team must catalogue all non-price factors that contribute to value. This includes technical specifications, vendor experience and reputation, implementation plan, support model, and financial stability. Each of these criteria must be broken down into specific, measurable sub-criteria.

- **Conduct Market Analysis to Inform Weighting** ▴ An understanding of the current market landscape is vital. In a highly competitive market with many mature, comparable solutions, a higher price weight may be appropriate, as technical differentiation might be minimal. Conversely, in a nascent or highly specialized market, technical capability and vendor expertise are likely far more important than price, and the weighting should reflect that reality.

- **Select the Appropriate Weighting Model** ▴ Based on the objectives and market analysis, the team must formally select the [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). For straightforward procurements, the Linear Weighted Average may suffice. For procurements where value for money is key, the Price-to-Quality Ratio is superior. For high-value, long-term assets, a full TCO analysis is the only truly responsible approach.

- **Normalize Scores for Objective Comparison** ▴ A critical execution step is ensuring that all scores are normalized to a common scale before weights are applied. This prevents a category with a wide scoring range from unintentionally having more influence than a category with a narrow range. Normalization formulas can be used to convert all raw scores to a 0-100 scale, ensuring that the assigned weights are the true determinants of influence.

- **Conduct Sensitivity Analysis** ▴ After initial scoring is complete, a sensitivity analysis should be performed. This involves systematically adjusting the weight of the price category (e.g. increasing and decreasing it by 5-10%) to see how it affects the final ranking of vendors. This analysis can reveal how dependent the outcome is on the price weight and can provide the committee with a deeper understanding of the trade-offs between cost and quality among the top-ranked proposals.

![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The heart of a well-executed evaluation is its quantitative rigor. This is most evident in the application of TCO and advanced decision-making models like the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([AHP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)). AHP provides a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, using mathematical principles to prioritize criteria and alternatives. It is particularly useful for deriving the weights for the evaluation criteria themselves through a process of pairwise comparison.

![A polished blue sphere representing a digital asset derivative rests on a metallic ring, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocols, supported by a foundational beige sphere, an institutional liquidity pool. A smaller blue sphere floats above, denoting atomic settlement or a private quotation within a Principal's Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-and-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Detailed TCO Calculation Model for an ERP System (5-Year Horizon)

The following table illustrates a TCO model for a hypothetical ERP system procurement. It demonstrates how a vendor with a higher initial acquisition cost can ultimately represent a lower [total cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of ownership.

| Cost Component | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Acquisition Costs | | | | One-time upfront costs. |
| Software Licensing | $500,000 | $750,000 | $600,000 | Perpetual license cost. |
| Implementation & Configuration | $400,000 | $250,000 | $300,000 | Vendor B has a more streamlined implementation process. |
| Initial Hardware | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | Assumed to be equal for this analysis. |
| Initial Training | $150,000 | $75,000 | $100,000 | Vendor B’s system is more intuitive. |
| Subtotal Acquisition | $1,150,000 | $1,175,000 | $1,100,000 | Vendor C appears cheapest initially. |
| Operating Costs (Annual) | | | | Recurring annual costs. |
| Annual Maintenance & Support | $100,000 | $120,000 | $150,000 | Vendor C has the highest support fees. |
| Additional User Licenses (Annual Growth) | $20,000 | $25,000 | $30,000 | Projected cost based on company growth. |
| IT Staff for System Admin (Annual) | $150,000 | $100,000 | $175,000 | Vendor A’s system is more complex to manage. |
| Total Annual Operating Costs | $270,000 | $245,000 | $355,000 | |
| Total Operating Costs (5 Years) | $1,350,000 | $1,225,000 | $1,775,000 | |
| Total Cost of Ownership (5 Years) | $2,500,000 | $2,400,000 | $2,875,000 | Vendor B has the lowest TCO. |

![A sleek, multi-component system, predominantly dark blue, features a cylindrical sensor with a central lens. This precision-engineered module embodies an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure observation, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study

A large manufacturing firm, “Global-Mech,” needs to procure a new fleet of 20 specialized delivery trucks. The procurement team decides to move beyond a simple price-based decision and adopt a TCO and weighted scoring approach. The evaluation criteria and weights are determined using the AHP method, resulting in ▴ Technical Performance (40%), TCO (30%), Service & Warranty (20%), and Delivery Time (10%).

Three vendors submit proposals. Vendor X offers the lowest initial price per truck ($70,000), but their vehicles have lower fuel efficiency and a shorter warranty period. Vendor Y has the highest initial price ($85,000), but their trucks boast superior fuel economy, a comprehensive 5-year warranty, and a strong service network. Vendor Z is a mid-range option ($75,000) with moderate performance across all categories.

The procurement team builds a 7-year TCO model. The model includes the initial purchase price, projected fuel costs (based on mileage and fuel efficiency), scheduled maintenance costs, and projected repair costs (based on warranty coverage and historical data). The TCO analysis reveals that Vendor Y, despite having the highest acquisition cost, has the lowest TCO over the 7-year lifecycle due to significant savings in fuel and repair expenses. Vendor X, the cheapest upfront, becomes the most expensive over the long term.

> A predictive case study demonstrates that the vendor with the lowest initial bid can often become the most expensive option when viewed through the lens of total cost of ownership.

When these TCO figures are converted into a normalized score and combined with the scores from the other evaluation criteria, the results are decisive. Vendor Y emerges with the highest total score, even though it was the most expensive option initially. The Global-Mech board, initially inclined to favor the lowest bidder, is presented with a clear, data-driven justification for selecting Vendor Y. The execution of the TCO model and the weighted scoring system allows them to make a decision that minimizes long-term costs and maximizes value, a feat that would have been impossible with a simplistic, price-focused evaluation. This case study becomes a powerful internal precedent, transforming how Global-Mech approaches all future high-value procurements.

![A sleek, angular Prime RFQ interface component featuring a vibrant teal sphere, symbolizing a precise control point for institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity across complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-control-point.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, T. L. (1980). _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill.

- Ghodsypour, S. H. & O’Brien, C. (2001). The total cost of ownership of a product/service ▴ a framework for supplier selection. _International Journal of Production Economics, 73_(1), 47-59.

- Ellram, L. M. (1995). Total cost of ownership ▴ an analysis of decision-making criteria and processes. _Journal of Business Logistics, 16_(1), 171.

- Degraeve, Z. Labro, E. & Roodhooft, F. (2000). An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. _European Journal of Operational Research, 125_(1), 34-58.

- Bhutta, K. S. & Huq, F. (2002). Supplier selection problem ▴ a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process models. _Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal, 7_(3), 126-135.

- Ho, W. Xu, X. & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review. _European Journal of Operational Research, 202_(1), 16-24.

- Kull, T. J. & Talluri, S. (2008). A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. _IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55_(3), 409-419.

- Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. _European journal of operational research, 48_(1), 2-8.

![An Institutional Grade RFQ Engine core for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer ensures High-Fidelity Execution, driving Optimal Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement for Aggregated Inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek, metallic platform features a sharp blade resting across its central dome. This visually represents the precision of institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-1.jpg)

## A System of Dynamic Intelligence

The framework for weighting price within an RFP scoring process should be viewed as a living system. It is a dynamic instrument of corporate intelligence, not a static, one-time calculation. The models and methodologies detailed here provide the architecture for making a defensible, data-driven decision at a single point in time. The true strategic advantage, however, is realized when this architecture is integrated into a continuous cycle of evaluation and refinement.

Each procurement decision generates a wealth of data on outcomes. Did the selected vendor deliver on their promises? Was the TCO model accurate? Did the non-price criteria prove to be reliable predictors of performance?

This feedback loop is the most critical component of the entire system. It allows the organization to learn, adapt, and calibrate its evaluation engine over time. The weights assigned in the next major procurement should be informed by the successes and failures of the last.

Consider the scoring model itself as an asset. Its value appreciates with each use, as it becomes more attuned to the specific market dynamics and internal priorities of the organization. The process of weighting price ceases to be a mere procedural step and becomes a sophisticated mechanism for aligning purchasing decisions with evolving corporate strategy, ensuring that every dollar spent is an investment in long-term value and operational excellence.

![A balanced blue semi-sphere rests on a horizontal bar, poised above diagonal rails, reflecting its form below. This symbolizes the precise atomic settlement of a block trade within an RFQ protocol, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency in institutional digital asset derivatives markets, managed by a Prime RFQ with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-6.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/does-the-optimal-bidder-disclosure-strategy-change-materially-between-a-stock-purchase-and-an-asset-purchase/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, metallic, modular hardware with visible circuit elements, symbolizing the market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. This low-latency infrastructure supports RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution for private quotation and block trade settlement, ensuring capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/market-microstructure-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol.jpg)

## Initial Purchase Price

The optimal bidder disclosure strategy shifts from a forensic audit of the entire entity in a stock purchase to a surgical validation of specific assets in an asset purchase. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

## Price Weighting

Meaning ▴ Price Weighting, within financial indices or portfolio construction in crypto investing, refers to a methodology where the influence or allocation of each underlying asset is determined by its current market price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, split capsule object reveals an internal glowing teal light connecting its two halves, symbolizing a secure, high-fidelity RFQ protocol facilitating atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents the precise execution of multi-leg spread strategies within a principal's operational framework, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-2.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee, in the context of institutional crypto investing, particularly for large-scale procurement of trading services, technology solutions, or strategic partnerships, refers to a designated group of experts responsible for assessing proposals and making recommendations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sharp, intersecting geometric planes in teal, deep blue, and beige form a precise, pointed leading edge against darkness. This signifies High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, reflecting complex Market Microstructure and Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria, within the context of crypto Request for Quote (RFQ) processes and vendor selection for institutional trading infrastructure, represent the predefined, measurable standards or benchmarks against which potential counterparties, technology solutions, or service providers are rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-pre-trade-models-account-for-non-linear-market-impact/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp, teal blade precisely dissects a cylindrical conduit. This visualizes surgical high-fidelity execution of block trades for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Linear Weighted Average

Pre-trade models account for non-linear impact by quantifying liquidity constraints to architect an optimal, cost-aware execution path. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A gold-hued precision instrument with a dark, sharp interface engages a complex circuit board, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within institutional market microstructure. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating private quotation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-precision-execution-engine-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-within-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-latency-jitter-be-a-more-powerful-predictor-than-average-latency/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-component device with a dark blue base and beige bands culminates in a sophisticated top mechanism. This precision instrument symbolizes a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating RFQ protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/advanced-mechanism-for-principal-trading-firm-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Average

Latency jitter is a more powerful predictor because it quantifies the system's instability, which directly impacts execution certainty. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Price Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/purchase-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

## Purchase Price

Meaning ▴ The purchase price is the agreed-upon price at which an asset, such as a cryptocurrency or a derivative contract, is acquired by a buyer. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Tco Analysis

Meaning ▴ TCO Analysis, or Total Cost of Ownership analysis, is a comprehensive financial methodology that quantifies all direct and indirect costs associated with the acquisition, operation, and maintenance of a particular asset, system, or solution throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek device showcases a rotating translucent teal disc, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and volatility surface visualization within an RFQ protocol. Its numerical display suggests a quantitative pricing engine facilitating algorithmic execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-for-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-with-smart-liquidity-routing.jpg)

## Tco Model

Meaning ▴ A Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Model, within the complex crypto infrastructure domain, represents a comprehensive financial analysis framework utilized by institutional investors, digital asset exchanges, or blockchain enterprises to quantify all direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and meticulously maintaining a specific technology solution or system over its entire projected lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/operating-costs/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, cut-open sphere reveals a sharp, luminous green prism, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework. The reflective interior denotes market microstructure insights and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-alpha-intelligence.jpg)

## Operating Costs

Meaning ▴ Operating costs represent the regular expenditures incurred by a business in the course of its normal activities to generate revenue, explicitly excluding capital expenses. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring

Meaning ▴ RFP Scoring, within the domain of institutional crypto and broader financial technology procurement, refers to the systematic and objective process of rigorously evaluating and ranking vendor responses to a Request for Proposal (RFP) based on a meticulously predefined set of weighted criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered modular components, with teal accents, align at a central interface. This visually embodies an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating principal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-interface-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Model, within the systems architecture of crypto investing and institutional trading, constitutes a quantitative analytical tool meticulously designed to assign numerical values to various attributes or indicators for the objective evaluation of a specific entity, asset, or event, thereby generating a composite, indicative score. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central metallic bar, representing an RFQ block trade, pivots through translucent geometric planes symbolizing dynamic liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. This illustrates a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing private quotation workflows](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-facilitating-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-optimal-capital-efficiency-within-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured decision-making framework designed to organize and analyze complex problems involving multiple, often qualitative, criteria and subjective judgments, particularly valuable in strategic crypto investing and technology evaluation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A solid object, symbolizing Principal execution via RFQ protocol, intersects a translucent counterpart representing algorithmic price discovery and institutional liquidity. This dynamic within a digital asset derivatives sphere depicts optimized market microstructure, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-orchestration.jpg)

## Ahp

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured multi-criteria decision-making framework designed to address complex problems by decomposing them into hierarchical components. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost represents the aggregated sum of all expenditures incurred in a specific process, project, or acquisition, encompassing both direct and indirect financial outlays. </a>

**Tags:** [Purchase Price](https://options.greeks.live/area/purchase-price/), [AHP](https://options.greeks.live/area/ahp/), [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/), [TCO Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/tco-analysis/), [Weighted Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/), [Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Should the Weighting of Rfp Scoring Criteria Be Determined to Ensure Strategic Alignment?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-rfp-scoring-criteria-be-determined-to-ensure-strategic-alignment/)
![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface. This Prime RFQ enables optimal price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and multi-leg spread trading for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and systemic risk mitigation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Determining RFP scoring weights is the systematic translation of strategic priorities into a defensible, quantitative model for optimal vendor selection.

- 
### [How to Evaluate Supplier Responses to an RFQ?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-to-evaluate-supplier-responses-to-an-rfq/)
![A sophisticated, symmetrical apparatus depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol hub for digital asset derivatives, where radiating panels symbolize liquidity aggregation across diverse market makers. Central beams illustrate real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spreads, ensuring atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-facilitating-atomic-settlement-and-high-fidelity-execution-of-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

Evaluating supplier RFQs is a systematic de-risking of the supply chain through a multi-criteria, data-driven decision architecture.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Rfp Evaluation Criteria for Different Types of Procurements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-for-different-types-of-procurements/)
![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria is the strategic calibration of a decision-making system to align procurement outcomes with core business objectives.

- 
### [How Does the Concept of Total Cost of Ownership Influence the Price Weighting in a Strategic Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-concept-of-total-cost-of-ownership-influence-the-price-weighting-in-a-strategic-rfp/)
![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

TCO systematically reweights an RFP from initial price to long-term value, ensuring procurement decisions enhance lifecycle financial performance.

- 
### [How Does a Weighted Scoring System in an RFP Contribute to a More Objective Decision?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-system-in-an-rfp-contribute-to-a-more-objective-decision/)
![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. Background diagonals abstractly depict market microstructure optimization via RFQ protocols ensuring high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

A weighted scoring system contributes to objectivity by translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable evaluation framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Score RFP Responses That Include Both Quantitative and Qualitative Data?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-score-rfp-responses-that-include-both-quantitative-and-qualitative-data/)
![Precision instrument with multi-layered dial, symbolizing price discovery and volatility surface calibration. Its metallic arm signifies an algorithmic trading engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for RFQ block trades, minimizing slippage within an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-calibrating-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

A calibrated scoring system translates strategic intent into a quantifiable, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Cultural Fit in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-cultural-fit-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A curved grey surface anchors a translucent blue disk, pierced by a sharp green financial instrument and two silver stylus elements. This visualizes a precise RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure via a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-optimizing-market-microstructure-and-price-discovery.jpg)

The optimal weight for cultural fit in an RFP model is a variable, strategically set between 5% and 35% based on project complexity.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Balance Price versus Quality in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-balance-price-versus-quality-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![Precision-engineered abstract components depict institutional digital asset derivatives trading. A central sphere, symbolizing core asset price discovery, supports intersecting elements representing multi-leg spreads and aggregated inquiry. Surrounding structures denote a robust Prime RFQ framework for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

A balanced RFP model is a calibrated system that quantifies quality to weigh it accurately against total lifecycle cost.

- 
### [How Does Weighting Price Differently in an RFP Impact Vendor Responses?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-weighting-price-differently-in-an-rfp-impact-vendor-responses/)
![A sleek, bi-component digital asset derivatives engine reveals its intricate core, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol. This Prime RFQ component enables high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure, managing latent liquidity for institutional operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution.jpg)

Weighting price in an RFP calibrates vendor responses, forcing a choice between cost-centric bids and value-driven proposals that reveal long-term partnership potential.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Best Practices for Weighting Price in an Rfp Scoring Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-weighting-price-in-an-rfp-scoring-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-weighting-price-in-an-rfp-scoring-process/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Best Practices for Weighting Price in an Rfp Scoring Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A calibrated RFP scoring system treats price as a critical input within a total value equation, not as the final arbiter. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-weighting-price-in-an-rfp-scoring-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T17:12:08+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-29T12:38:32+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated execution engine is depicted: beige data input, dark data stream, teal liquidity pool reel with clear processing head. This embodies an advanced RFQ protocol, facilitating high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread strategies and optimal price discovery. It mitigates latency, ensuring capital efficiency via smart order routing, pivotal for institutional prime brokerage within a Crypto Derivatives OS intelligence layer, bolstering systemic resilience."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AHP",
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Operating Costs",
        "Price Weighting",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Purchase Price",
        "Quantitative Procurement",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Scoring Model",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "TCO Analysis",
        "TCO Model",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-weighting-price-in-an-rfp-scoring-process/
