# What Are the Differences in Skin-In-The-Game Requirements between US and European CCPs? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-03
**Categories:** Question

---

![A precision-engineered metallic cross-structure, embodying an RFQ engine's market microstructure, showcases diverse elements. One granular arm signifies aggregated liquidity pools and latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-microstructure-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![A sleek, multi-component mechanism features a light upper segment meeting a darker, textured lower part. A diagonal bar pivots on a circular sensor, signifying High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ Protocols for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-with-prime-os-integration.jpg)

## Concept

The concept of “skin-in-the-game” (SITG) within a [Central Counterparty](https://prime.greeks.live/area/central-counterparty/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CCP) is the architectural lynchpin of its incentive structure. It represents the precise point in the risk-management framework where the CCP transitions from a neutral market utility to a principal with its own capital at risk. Understanding the differences in how US and European regulatory frameworks codify this principle is to understand their fundamental philosophies on managing [systemic risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The divergence is immediate and profound.

The European Union, through its European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), mandates a specific, harmonized requirement for a CCP’s own capital contribution to its default resources. Conversely, the [United States](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-regulatory-frameworks-govern-counterparty-pre-hedging-in-the-united-states-and-europe/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) regulatory environment, overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the [Securities and Exchange Commission](https://prime.greeks.live/area/securities-and-exchange-commission/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SEC), imposes no such explicit prescription. US CCPs determine their SITG levels as a matter of internal policy and governance, driven by market expectations and their own risk modeling.

This core distinction shapes the entire operational and strategic landscape for clearing members and the CCPs themselves. SITG is a portion of a CCP’s own funds that is designated to absorb losses resulting from the default of a [clearing member](https://prime.greeks.live/area/clearing-member/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Its primary function, however, is not to act as a substantial capital buffer. The amounts are typically too small in the context of a major default to provide meaningful loss absorption.

For instance, in the European Union, SITG accounts for a very small fraction, approximately 0.2%, of the average pre-funded [default waterfall](https://prime.greeks.live/area/default-waterfall/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The true purpose of SITG is to align the incentives of the CCP with those of its clearing members. By placing its own capital at risk, the CCP is powerfully motivated to maintain robust risk-management practices, from setting prudent initial margin requirements to rigorously monitoring member exposures. This ensures the CCP’s pursuit of profit is inextricably linked to the public good of financial stability.

> The fundamental difference in skin-in-the-game requirements lies in Europe’s prescriptive regulatory mandate versus the US’s market-driven, firm-specific policy approach.

The debate over SITG calibration revolves around this incentive mechanism. Clearing members generally advocate for higher CCP SITG, as it strengthens the CCP’s commitment to conservative [risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The CCP, on the other hand, must balance this with the cost of capital.

The two dominant regulatory regimes have arrived at structurally different conclusions on how to strike this balance, leading to distinct operational realities for any institution clearing trades across both jurisdictions. The European model provides certainty and standardization, while the American model offers flexibility at the cost of heterogeneity.

![A slender metallic probe extends between two curved surfaces. This abstractly illustrates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, driving price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![A beige probe precisely connects to a dark blue metallic port, symbolizing high-fidelity execution of Digital Asset Derivatives via an RFQ protocol. Alphanumeric markings denote specific multi-leg spread parameters, highlighting granular market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-execution-hub.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic implications of the divergent approaches to skin-in-the-game between the US and Europe are significant, influencing everything from a clearing member’s [due diligence](https://prime.greeks.live/area/due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process to a CCP’s competitive positioning. These are not merely technical differences in rulemaking; they represent distinct strategic frameworks for mitigating systemic risk.

![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## The European Framework a Mandate for Harmony

The European Union’s strategy, codified in EMIR, is one of regulatory harmonization and predictability. The framework mandates that a CCP must hold a dedicated amount of its own pre-funded resources to be used in a default scenario. This contribution must be at least 25% of the CCP’s minimum regulatory capital requirement.

This creates a clear, consistent, and legally binding floor for SITG across all EU-based CCPs. From a strategic standpoint, this standardization simplifies the assessment process for market participants, as they can rely on a known minimum commitment from any European CCP.

Crucially, EMIR also stipulates the position of this capital within the default waterfall. The CCP’s SITG is to be consumed after the defaulting member’s own contributions are exhausted but before the mutualized [default fund contributions](https://prime.greeks.live/area/default-fund-contributions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of the surviving, non-defaulting members are touched. This positioning is a powerful strategic choice. It ensures the CCP suffers a financial loss ahead of its non-defaulting members, creating a direct and unambiguous incentive for diligent risk management.

The downside of this prescriptive approach is its potential for rigidity. A single percentage may not be optimal for all types of CCPs, and as critics point out, the mandated amount is often symbolic rather than a material loss-absorbing layer.

![A precision-engineered teal metallic mechanism, featuring springs and rods, connects to a light U-shaped interface. This represents a core RFQ protocol component enabling automated price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-execution-engine-component-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## The United States Framework a Market-Driven Discipline

The US strategy embodies a principles-based philosophy. Federal regulations from the [SEC](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sec/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and [CFTC](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cftc/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) do not specify a minimum amount or percentage for a CCP’s SITG. Instead, the decision is delegated to the CCP’s own governance, risk management framework, and capital management policy, subject to regulatory oversight. Major US CCPs, such as those operated by CME Group and The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), do contribute their own capital to the default waterfall, but they do so based on their own internal assessments.

The rationale behind this approach is that a CCP, in conjunction with its members, is best placed to determine the optimal capital structure that aligns incentives without creating undue moral hazard. Proponents argue this allows for greater flexibility and innovation, enabling a CCP to tailor its SITG to the specific risks of the products it clears. For example, the OCC has established a multi-tranche SITG structure, demonstrating a more complex approach than the flat mandate in Europe.

However, this heterogeneity demands a higher level of due diligence from clearing members. Each US CCP’s rulebook must be analyzed individually to understand the level of protection afforded by its SITG, creating a more fragmented and complex analytical landscape for market participants.

> Navigating the transatlantic clearing landscape requires recognizing that Europe prioritizes standardized incentives while the US favors tailored, firm-specific risk governance.

The following table provides a strategic comparison of the two regimes:

| Feature | European Union (EMIR) | United States (CFTC/SEC) | Strategic Implication |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Regulatory Mandate | Prescriptive. Minimum SITG is explicitly required by law. | Principles-based. No explicit regulatory minimum for SITG. | EU provides legal certainty and standardization; US relies on market discipline and individual CCP governance. |
| Sizing Methodology | At least 25% of the CCP’s minimum regulatory capital. | Determined by each CCP’s internal capital and risk management policies. | EU offers a consistent baseline for comparison; US requires bespoke analysis of each CCP’s rulebook. |
| Position in Waterfall | Typically junior to defaulter’s assets, senior to non-defaulters’ fund contributions. | Varies by CCP rulebook but generally follows a similar principle to align incentives. | The incentive structure is explicit in the EU. In the US, it is a function of the individual CCP’s design choices. |
| Primary Rationale | To create a harmonized, strong incentive for prudent risk management across the single market. | To allow CCPs the flexibility to size their capital contribution appropriately for their specific risk profile. | The EU prioritizes systemic consistency, while the US prioritizes firm-level optimization and flexibility. |

![A transparent cylinder containing a white sphere floats between two curved structures, each featuring a glowing teal line. This depicts institutional-grade RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and liquidity aggregation through a Prime RFQ for optimal block trade atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

![Abstract system interface on a global data sphere, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing circuits represent market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, facilitating price discovery and capital efficiency across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Execution

From an execution perspective, the differences in skin-in-the-game requirements manifest directly in the operational mechanics of the default waterfall. This is the sequence of pre-funded resources used to cover losses from a clearing member’s failure. For a portfolio manager or risk officer, understanding the precise execution of this waterfall is paramount to assessing [counterparty risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

![A sophisticated system's core component, representing an Execution Management System, drives a precise, luminous RFQ protocol beam. This beam navigates between balanced spheres symbolizing counterparties and intricate market microstructure, facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, optimizing price discovery, and ensuring high-fidelity execution within a prime brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-10.jpg)

## The Default Waterfall an Operational Blueprint

The default waterfall is the core technology of CCP risk management. Its design is intended to contain the fallout from a member default and prevent contagion. The sequence of its layers is a critical piece of financial engineering. While the general structure is similar globally, the inclusion and sizing of the CCP’s SITG layer is a key point of operational divergence between the US and Europe.

![A sleek, multi-component device with a dark blue base and beige bands culminates in a sophisticated top mechanism. This precision instrument symbolizes a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating RFQ protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/advanced-mechanism-for-principal-trading-firm-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## How Does the European Waterfall Execute?

In Europe, the execution of the waterfall is standardized by EMIR. Following a member default, the resources are consumed in a predictable order. The operational sequence provides clarity to all surviving members about their potential exposure.

- **The Defaulter’s Resources** ▴ The first resources to be used are the initial margin and [default fund](https://prime.greeks.live/area/default-fund/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) contributions of the failed clearing member. This embodies the “defaulter pays” principle.

- **The CCP’s Skin-in-the-Game** ▴ Once the defaulter’s resources are exhausted, the CCP’s own capital is next in line. This is the mandated SITG (at least 25% of regulatory capital), which acts as a buffer protecting the non-defaulting members.

- **The [Mutualized Default Fund](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mutualized-default-fund/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Only after the CCP’s SITG is fully consumed are the default fund contributions of the surviving, non-defaulting members utilized. This mutualization of risk is the final pre-funded layer.

- **Further Assessments** ▴ If losses exceed even the mutualized fund, the CCP has the authority to call for additional funds from its surviving members.

The critical operational point is that the CCP has a fixed, known financial stake in the game that it loses before any non-defaulting member does. This creates a powerful operational incentive for the CCP to conduct its daily risk management with extreme prejudice.

![A teal-blue disk, symbolizing a liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives, is intersected by a bar. This represents an RFQ protocol or block trade, detailing high-fidelity execution pathways](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## Execution in the United States a Case-by-Case Analysis

In the United States, there is no single answer to how the waterfall executes because there is no single rule for SITG. Each CCP’s rulebook defines the process. While the “defaulter pays first” principle is universal, the role of the CCP’s own capital is bespoke. For example, some US CCPs have historically had minimal or no SITG, while others have robust, multi-layered contributions.

Market pressure and the desire for equivalence with international standards have pushed many US CCPs to formalize and increase their SITG. The OCC, for instance, has implemented a policy with two tranches of SITG, demonstrating a sophisticated, firm-specific approach that requires detailed analysis by its members. This means that for a clearing member, the execution analysis of a US CCP is an exercise in legal and financial due diligence on that specific entity’s rules.

> A clearing member’s risk assessment must account for the fact that European CCPs offer a standardized waterfall execution, whereas US CCPs require individual rulebook analysis.

The following table illustrates a simplified, hypothetical default waterfall to show the operational position of SITG.

| Loss Layer | Source of Funds | Illustrative Amount (Millions) | Primary Purpose |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Defaulting Member’s Margin & DF Contribution | $500 | Defaulter Pays Principle |
| 2 | CCP Skin-in-the-Game (SITG) | $50 | CCP Incentive Alignment |
| 3 | Surviving Members’ Mutualized Default Fund | $2,500 | Mutualized Risk Absorption |
| 4 | CCP Power of Assessment on Members | Variable | Extreme Loss Coverage |

For any institution operating in global markets, understanding these operational distinctions is not academic. It is a fundamental component of counterparty risk management and strategic decision-making.

![A sleek, light interface, a Principal's Prime RFQ, overlays a dark, intricate market microstructure. This represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, showcasing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-system.jpg)

## References

- Armakolla, Eva, and Kalimberi, Evangelia. “A CCP’s skin-in-the-game ▴ Is there a trade-off?” The World Federation of Exchanges, 2021.

- Carter, Louise, and Garner, Megan. “Skin in the Game ▴ Central Counterparty Risk Controls and Incentives.” Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, June 2015.

- CME Group. “Clearing ▴ Balancing CCP and Member Contributions with Exposures.” 2021.

- European Association of CCP Clearing Houses (EACH). “Carrots and sticks ▴ How the skin in the game incentivises CCPs to perform robust risk management.” 2021.

- Risk.net. “Thin-skinned ▴ are CCPs skimping on capital cover?” 9 December 2024.

- The Options Clearing Corporation. “Optimizing Incentives, Resilience and Stability in Central Counterparty Clearing.” 2020.

- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Notice of Filing of Advance Notice Relating to OCC’s Establishment of Persistent Minimum Skin-In-The-Game.” Release No. 34-91192; File No. SR-OCC-2021-801, 23 February 2021.

![A sleek Principal's Operational Framework connects to a glowing, intricate teal ring structure. This depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and optimal price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-execution-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Reflection

The examination of skin-in-the-game requirements reveals more than just a transatlantic regulatory divergence. It exposes a fundamental choice in the architecture of financial stability. The European model prioritizes systemic uniformity, creating a predictable and level playing field through explicit mandates.

The US model champions market-based discipline, allowing for firm-specific optimization and innovation at the cost of standardization. Neither architecture is inherently superior; they are different systems designed with different priorities.

![A sharp, teal blade precisely dissects a cylindrical conduit. This visualizes surgical high-fidelity execution of block trades for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## What Does This Mean for Your Operational Framework?

An institution’s operational framework must be calibrated to navigate this dual reality. A reliance on a single, standardized due diligence checklist is insufficient. The analysis of a US-based CCP demands a granular, rulebook-specific approach, while the analysis of a European CCP can leverage the baseline provided by EMIR. The knowledge gained here is a component in a larger system of intelligence.

It prompts a deeper introspection ▴ Is your own risk management framework sufficiently adaptive to account for these foundational differences in regulatory philosophy? The ultimate strategic edge is found not in simply knowing the rules, but in constructing an operational system that can dynamically adapt to the architecture of any market in which you choose to compete.

![Precision metallic pointers converge on a central blue mechanism. This symbolizes Market Microstructure of Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, depicting High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ protocols, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Atomic Settlement for Multi-Leg Spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-precision-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/central-counterparty/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract RFQ engine, transparent blades symbolize multi-leg spread execution and high-fidelity price discovery. The central hub aggregates deep liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-high-fidelity-block-trade.jpg)

## Central Counterparty

Meaning ▴ A Central Counterparty (CCP), in the realm of crypto derivatives and institutional trading, acts as an intermediary between transacting parties, effectively becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust metallic framework supports a teal half-sphere, symbolizing an institutional grade digital asset derivative or block trade processed within a Prime RFQ environment. This abstract view highlights the intricate market microstructure and high-fidelity execution of an RFQ protocol, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage through precise system interaction](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Systemic Risk

Meaning ▴ Systemic Risk, within the evolving cryptocurrency ecosystem, signifies the inherent potential for the failure or distress of a single interconnected entity, protocol, or market infrastructure to trigger a cascading, widespread collapse across the entire digital asset market or a significant segment thereof. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/securities-and-exchange-commission/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated modular component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, featuring an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Its precision engineering facilitates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency for institutional participants](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-module.jpg)

## Securities and Exchange Commission

Meaning ▴ The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the principal federal regulatory agency in the United States, established to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient securities markets, and facilitate capital formation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-regulatory-frameworks-govern-counterparty-pre-hedging-in-the-united-states-and-europe/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A segmented rod traverses a multi-layered spherical structure, depicting a streamlined Institutional RFQ Protocol. This visual metaphor illustrates optimal Digital Asset Derivatives price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and robust liquidity pool integration, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow-1.jpg)

## United States

US and EU frameworks govern pre-hedging via anti-abuse rules, demanding firms manage information and conflicts systemically. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/clearing-member/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate metallic mechanisms portray a proprietary matching engine or execution management system. Its robust structure enables algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Clearing Member

Meaning ▴ A clearing member is a financial institution, typically a bank or brokerage, authorized by a clearing house to clear and settle trades on behalf of itself and its clients. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/default-waterfall/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic circular financial instrument with segmented teal and grey zones, centered by a precision indicator, symbolizes an advanced Crypto Derivatives OS. This system facilitates institutional-grade RFQ protocols for block trades, enabling granular price discovery and optimal multi-leg spread execution across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-platform.jpg)

## Default Waterfall

Meaning ▴ A Default Waterfall, in the context of risk management architecture for Central Counterparties (CCPs) or other clearing mechanisms in institutional crypto trading, defines the precise, sequential order in which financial resources are deployed to cover losses arising from a clearing member's default. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image depicts two interconnected modular systems, one ivory and one teal, symbolizing robust institutional grade infrastructure for digital asset derivatives. Glowing internal components represent algorithmic trading engines and intelligence layers facilitating RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement of multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-1.jpg)

## Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Risk Management, within the cryptocurrency trading domain, encompasses the comprehensive process of identifying, assessing, monitoring, and mitigating the multifaceted financial, operational, and technological exposures inherent in digital asset markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract depiction of an advanced institutional trading system, featuring a prominent sensor for real-time price discovery and an intelligence layer. Visible circuitry signifies algorithmic trading capabilities, low-latency execution, and robust FIX protocol integration for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-high-fidelity-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Due Diligence

Meaning ▴ Due Diligence, in the context of crypto investing and institutional trading, represents the comprehensive and systematic investigation undertaken to assess the risks, opportunities, and overall viability of a potential investment, counterparty, or platform within the digital asset space. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/default-fund-contributions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central blue sphere, representing a Liquidity Pool, balances on a white dome, the Prime RFQ. Perpendicular beige and teal arms, embodying RFQ protocols and Multi-Leg Spread strategies, extend to four peripheral blue elements](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-framework.jpg)

## Default Fund Contributions

Meaning ▴ Default Fund Contributions, particularly relevant in the context of Central Counterparty (CCP) models within traditional and emerging institutional crypto derivatives markets, refer to the pre-funded capital provided by clearing members to a central clearing house. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cftc/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A proprietary Prime RFQ platform featuring extending blue/teal components, representing a multi-leg options strategy or complex RFQ spread. The labeled band 'F331 46 1' denotes a specific strike price or option series within an aggregated inquiry for high-fidelity execution, showcasing granular market microstructure data points](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-1.jpg)

## Cftc

Meaning ▴ The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is an independent regulatory agency of the United States government primarily responsible for overseeing the integrity and stability of the U. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sec/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-faceted digital asset derivative, precisely calibrated on a sophisticated circular mechanism. This represents a Prime Brokerage's robust RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage within complex market microstructure, critical for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-2.jpg)

## Sec

Meaning ▴ The SEC, or the U. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic circular interface, segmented by a prominent 'X' with a luminous central core, visually represents an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts precise market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Counterparty Risk

Meaning ▴ Counterparty risk, within the domain of crypto investing and institutional options trading, represents the potential for financial loss arising from a counterparty's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/default-fund/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished blue sphere representing a digital asset derivative rests on a metallic ring, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocols, supported by a foundational beige sphere, an institutional liquidity pool. A smaller blue sphere floats above, denoting atomic settlement or a private quotation within a Principal's Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-and-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Default Fund

Meaning ▴ A Default Fund, particularly within the architecture of a Central Counterparty (CCP) or a similar risk management framework in institutional crypto derivatives trading, is a pool of financial resources contributed by clearing members and often supplemented by the CCP itself. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mutualized-default-fund/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A detailed view of an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading interface, featuring a central liquidity pool visualization through a clear, tinted disc. Subtle market microstructure elements are visible, suggesting real-time price discovery and order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-display.jpg)

## Mutualized Default Fund

Meaning ▴ A Mutualized Default Fund, within the context of crypto derivatives clearing, is a collective pool of capital contributed by all clearing members, designed to absorb losses arising from the default of a clearing participant that exceed their individual collateral and initial margin. </a>

**Tags:** [Default Fund Contributions](https://options.greeks.live/area/default-fund-contributions/), [Central Counterparty](https://options.greeks.live/area/central-counterparty/), [SEC](https://options.greeks.live/area/sec/), [Counterparty Risk](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/), [CFTC](https://options.greeks.live/area/cftc/), [Mutualized Default Fund](https://options.greeks.live/area/mutualized-default-fund/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between Bilateral and Multilateral Netting Risk?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-bilateral-and-multilateral-netting-risk/)
![Two distinct components, beige and green, are securely joined by a polished blue metallic element. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimal liquidity. It visualizes best execution within market microstructure, supporting multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-link.jpg)

Bilateral netting reduces risk between two parties; multilateral netting centralizes and socializes risk through a central counterparty for greater systemic stability.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between the U.s. and European Ccp Waterfall Structures?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-the-u-s-and-european-ccp-waterfall-structures/)
![A precision metallic instrument with a black sphere rests on a multi-layered platform. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery across diverse liquidity pools. Essential for managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within the Prime RFQ protocol intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-component-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure.jpg)

The primary difference lies in the mandated sequence of loss allocation, with the EU model prioritizing CCP capital contribution before member funds.

- 
### [How Do CCP Default Funds Alter the Risk Profile for a Clearing Member?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-ccp-default-funds-alter-the-risk-profile-for-a-clearing-member/)
![A marbled sphere symbolizes a complex institutional block trade, resting on segmented platforms representing diverse liquidity pools and execution venues. This visualizes sophisticated RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within dynamic market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. It reflects capital efficiency and intelligent smart order routing.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-aggregation-digital-asset-derivative-execution-optimization.jpg)

A CCP default fund transforms a member's risk from direct counterparty failure to a quantified, mutualized liability within a systemic defense.

- 
### [How Does the Cover 2 Standard Impact CCP Default Fund Sizing?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-cover-2-standard-impact-ccp-default-fund-sizing/)
![Precision-engineered metallic discs, interconnected by a central spindle, against a deep void, symbolize the core architecture of an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. This setup facilitates private quotation, robust portfolio margin, and high-fidelity execution, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-infrastructure.jpg)

The Cover 2 standard sizes a CCP's default fund to absorb the simultaneous failure of its two largest members, ensuring systemic resilience.

- 
### [How Does a Central Counterparty’s Default Waterfall Function during a Member Failure?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-central-counterpartys-default-waterfall-function-during-a-member-failure/)
![Abstract geometric representation of an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Two distinct segments symbolize cross-market liquidity pools and order book dynamics. A central, illuminated conduit signifies high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within a Principal's operational framework, optimizing block trade settlement and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-2.jpg)

A CCP's default waterfall is a tiered risk-mitigation protocol that sequentially allocates default losses to ensure market integrity.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Incentives for Clearing Members to Participate in a Defaulter’s Portfolio Auction?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-incentives-for-clearing-members-to-participate-in-a-defaulters-portfolio-auction/)
![A dark blue sphere, representing a deep institutional liquidity pool, integrates a central RFQ engine. This system processes aggregated inquiries for Digital Asset Derivatives, including Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, enabling high-fidelity execution. Two fins symbolize advanced multi-leg spread strategies and dynamic delta hedging, enhancing capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimized-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A clearing member's incentive to bid in a defaulter's auction is a calculus of defending its capital and seizing unique profit opportunities.

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Frameworks Governing the Minimum Required Skin in the Game for CCPs?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-frameworks-governing-the-minimum-required-skin-in-the-game-for-ccps/)
![Multi-faceted, reflective geometric form against dark void, symbolizing complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Sharp angles depict high-fidelity execution, price discovery via RFQ protocols, enabling liquidity aggregation for block trades, optimizing capital efficiency through a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-engine.jpg)

A CCP's "skin in the game" is a mandated capital layer in the default waterfall that aligns its incentives with market stability.

- 
### [How Does Central Clearing Fundamentally Alter the Risk Profile of Exchange Traded Derivatives?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-central-clearing-fundamentally-alter-the-risk-profile-of-exchange-traded-derivatives/)
![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools. Spheres denote aggregated inquiry and price discovery within a robust Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating systemic risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

Central clearing transforms the risk of exchange-traded derivatives by substituting bilateral credit risk with a managed, mutualized exposure to a central counterparty.

- 
### [How Do Different CCPs Cap Their Member Assessment Liabilities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-different-ccps-cap-their-member-assessment-liabilities/)
![A precision-engineered metallic component with a central circular mechanism, secured by fasteners, embodies a Prime RFQ engine. It drives institutional liquidity and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating atomic settlement of block trades and private quotation within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-of-block-trades.jpg)

CCPs cap member assessment liabilities via predefined rules, typically as a multiple of a member's default fund contribution.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Differences in Skin-In-The-Game Requirements between US and European CCPs?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-differences-in-skin-in-the-game-requirements-between-us-and-european-ccps/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-differences-in-skin-in-the-game-requirements-between-us-and-european-ccps/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Differences in Skin-In-The-Game Requirements between US and European CCPs? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Europe mandates a minimum CCP skin-in-the-game, while the US relies on firm-specific policies for incentive alignment. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-differences-in-skin-in-the-game-requirements-between-us-and-european-ccps/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-03T20:02:53+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-24T19:26:43+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg",
        "caption": "The abstract composition features three circular, metallic mechanisms, embodying the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. The central element symbolizes price discovery and quantitative analysis for RFQ protocols, while the segmented outer dials denote liquidity pool management, multi-leg spread execution, and mitigating counterparty risk. This visual encapsulates the Prime RFQ commitment to high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a sophisticated algorithmic trading framework for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "CCP Skin-in-the-Game",
        "Central Counterparty",
        "Central Counterparty (CCP)",
        "CFTC",
        "Clearing Member",
        "Clearing Member Contributions",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Default Fund",
        "Default Fund Contributions",
        "Default Waterfall",
        "Due Diligence",
        "Financial Regulation",
        "Mutualized Default Fund",
        "Risk Management",
        "SEC",
        "Securities and Exchange Commission",
        "Skin-in-the-Game (SITG)",
        "Systemic Risk"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does The European Waterfall Execute?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "In Europe, the execution of the waterfall is standardized by EMIR. Following a member default, the resources are consumed in a predictable order. The operational sequence provides clarity to all surviving members about their potential exposure."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Does This Mean for Your Operational Framework?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "An institution's operational framework must be calibrated to navigate this dual reality. A reliance on a single, standardized due diligence checklist is insufficient. The analysis of a US-based CCP demands a granular, rulebook-specific approach, while the analysis of a European CCP can leverage the baseline provided by EMIR. The knowledge gained here is a component in a larger system of intelligence. It prompts a deeper introspection: Is your own risk management framework sufficiently adaptive to account for these foundational differences in regulatory philosophy? The ultimate strategic edge is found not in simply knowing the rules, but in constructing an operational system that can dynamically adapt to the architecture of any market in which you choose to compete."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-differences-in-skin-in-the-game-requirements-between-us-and-european-ccps/
