# What Are the Key Differences between a Systematic Internaliser and an OTF for RFQ Workflows? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-17
**Categories:** Question

---

![A central, metallic, multi-bladed mechanism, symbolizing a core execution engine or RFQ hub, emits luminous teal data streams. These streams traverse through fragmented, transparent structures, representing dynamic market microstructure, high-fidelity price discovery, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery-across-fragmented-market-microstructure.jpg)

![A deconstructed mechanical system with segmented components, revealing intricate gears and polished shafts, symbolizing the transparent, modular architecture of an institutional digital asset derivatives trading platform. This illustrates multi-leg spread execution, RFQ protocols, and atomic settlement processes](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/deconstructed-principal-trading-system-revealing-core-mechanics-of-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The distinction between a [Systematic Internaliser](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systematic-internaliser/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SI) and an [Organised Trading Facility](https://prime.greeks.live/area/organised-trading-facility/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (OTF) within the context of Request for Quote (RFQ) workflows represents a fundamental divergence in market structure design, codified under the MiFID II framework. This is not a subtle variation in terminology; it is the operational expression of two different philosophies of liquidity interaction. An SI operates as a bilateral engagement where an investment firm uses its own capital to fulfill client orders, effectively acting as a principal counterparty in a private negotiation.

Conversely, an OTF provides a multilateral environment, a discretionary execution venue where multiple third-party [liquidity providers](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-role-do-non-bank-liquidity-providers-play-in-offering-deep-liquidity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) can compete for [client orders](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-dealers-system-differentiate-between-an-rfq-from-an-informed-client-versus-an-uninformed-client/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), all managed under the oversight of the facility operator. The core of their operational DNA is different ▴ one is a principal-based, own-account trading system, while the other is a discretionary, multi-dealer platform.

Understanding this division requires acknowledging the regulatory intent behind their creation. The SI regime was expanded under [MiFID II](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to increase transparency in what was previously opaque over-the-counter (OTC) trading. By compelling firms that internalize client order flow on a significant scale to register as SIs, regulators aimed to subject this activity to pre-trade and [post-trade transparency](https://prime.greeks.live/area/post-trade-transparency/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) obligations, thereby integrating it more formally into the visible market landscape. An SI, therefore, is an investment firm executing client orders against its own book.

The [RFQ workflow](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in this context is a direct query to this single, principal liquidity source. The firm is obligated to provide a quote under certain conditions, and the interaction is inherently one-to-one, even if the client sends RFQs to multiple SIs sequentially.

> The essential contrast lies in the nature of the trading environment ▴ an SI is a bilateral, principal-based counterparty, whereas an OTF is a multilateral venue with discretionary matching.

The OTF category was introduced as a new type of trading venue to capture organized trading that did not fit the prescriptive, non-discretionary rulebooks of Regulated Markets (RMs) or Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTFs). OTFs are specifically designed for [non-equity instruments](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-equity-instruments/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) like bonds and derivatives, where discretion in execution can be crucial. Within an OTF’s RFQ workflow, a client’s request is broadcast to a network of participating liquidity providers. The OTF operator can exercise discretion in deciding how and when to match orders, a feature entirely absent from both SIs and other trading venues.

This introduces a layer of managed liquidity interaction, where the venue itself plays a role in the price formation process beyond simply applying a set of deterministic rules. The result is a competitive auction within a regulated framework, a stark contrast to the direct, principal-to-client trade that defines the SI model.

![A central, metallic cross-shaped RFQ protocol engine orchestrates principal liquidity aggregation between two distinct institutional liquidity pools. Its intricate design suggests high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within digital asset options trading, forming a core Crypto Derivatives OS for algorithmic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![A marbled sphere symbolizes a complex institutional block trade, resting on segmented platforms representing diverse liquidity pools and execution venues. This visualizes sophisticated RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within dynamic market microstructure for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-aggregation-digital-asset-derivative-execution-optimization.jpg)

## Strategy

Selecting between a Systematic Internaliser and an [Organised Trading](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-multilateral-trading-facility-and-an-organised-trading-facility/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Facility for executing a Request for Quote workflow is a significant strategic decision for any institutional trader. The choice directly influences execution quality, [information leakage](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-machine-learning-models-be-used-to-predict-and-mitigate-rfq-information-leakage-in-real-time-2/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), counterparty relationships, and operational efficiency. The two frameworks, while both facilitating off-order-book liquidity access, present fundamentally different strategic trade-offs rooted in their market structure. A firm’s execution policy must weigh the benefits of direct, principal-based liquidity from an SI against the competitive, multi-dealer environment of an OTF.

![Intersecting concrete structures symbolize the robust Market Microstructure underpinning Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Dynamic spheres represent Liquidity Pools and Implied Volatility](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-optimizing-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-for-principal-trading.jpg)

## Operational Frameworks a Comparative Analysis

The strategic decision hinges on the distinct operational mechanics of each entity. An SI acts as a dedicated liquidity source, leveraging its own balance sheet to price and execute client orders. This creates a direct, bilateral relationship.

An OTF, on the other hand, functions as an intermediary, a regulated environment where [multiple liquidity providers](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-single-fix-message-initiate-an-rfq-to-multiple-liquidity-providers-simultaneously/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) compete. The OTF operator’s ability to apply discretion in order matching adds a unique strategic dimension, allowing for managed execution that can be particularly valuable in less liquid markets or for complex instruments.

The following table provides a granular comparison of the key attributes that define the strategic landscape for RFQ execution:

| Attribute | Systematic Internaliser (SI) | Organised Trading Facility (OTF) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Trading Capacity | Deals on own account (principal trading). The SI is the direct counterparty to the client’s trade. | Operates on a discretionary basis. Can facilitate matched principal trading or agency trading; cannot use its own capital against its clients. |
| Execution Model | Bilateral. A client sends an RFQ to the SI, which responds with a quote from its own book. | Multilateral. A client’s RFQ is submitted to multiple participating liquidity providers within the venue. |
| Discretion | No discretion in execution. The SI must adhere to its published quotes and commercial policies in a non-discriminatory manner. | High degree of discretion is permitted in order handling and matching, such as deciding when to place or retract an order on the system. |
| Counterparty Relationship | Direct and known. The client knows they are trading with the SI as principal. | Indirect. The client trades with one of the responding liquidity providers on the platform; identity may or may not be disclosed pre-trade. |
| Asset Scope | Applicable to all asset classes, including equities, bonds, and derivatives, subject to meeting quantitative thresholds. | Restricted to non-equity instruments (e.g. bonds, structured finance products, derivatives, emission allowances). |
| Pre-Trade Transparency | Required to make firm quotes public when certain conditions are met, though this can be provided to clients on request for less liquid instruments. | Pre-trade transparency rules apply, but waivers are common for RFQ systems, meaning quotes are typically only visible to the requesting client. |

![A complex, faceted geometric object, symbolizing a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its translucent blue sections represent aggregated liquidity pools and RFQ protocol pathways, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Strategic Implications for RFQ Workflows

The structural differences translate into distinct strategic considerations for traders. The choice is rarely about one being universally superior; it is about selecting the appropriate tool for a specific execution objective.

- **Certainty of Execution** When a trader requires a high degree of certainty for a trade, especially in a specific size, engaging an SI can be advantageous. The SI’s obligation to provide a firm quote from its own capital provides a reliable liquidity source, minimizing the risk of failed execution that can occur in a competitive auction if no dealer responds favorably. 

- **Minimizing Information Leakage** For sensitive orders, the bilateral nature of an SI RFQ can be a powerful tool to control information leakage. The quote request is exposed only to the SI, preventing the broader market from inferring trading intent. In an OTF, the request is broadcast to multiple participants, which, while promoting competition, also widens the circle of participants aware of the order. 

- **[Price Improvement](https://prime.greeks.live/question/could-a-different-market-structure-achieve-both-price-improvement-and-efficient-price-discovery-simultaneously/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and Discovery** The competitive dynamic of an OTF is explicitly designed to foster price improvement. By placing multiple liquidity providers in competition, the OTF framework creates an environment where dealers are incentivized to provide their best price to win the trade. This is a primary mechanism for achieving [best execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) through competitive tension. 

- **Access to Niche Liquidity** OTFs can provide access to a more diverse pool of liquidity providers, including regional banks or specialized funds that may not operate as large-scale SIs. For instruments with unique characteristics or in markets with fragmented liquidity, an OTF can aggregate interest from a wider range of counterparties. 

> The strategic calculus balances the SI’s certainty and discretion against the OTF’s competitive price discovery and diverse liquidity access.

![A sleek, multi-faceted plane represents a Principal's operational framework and Execution Management System. A central glossy black sphere signifies a block trade digital asset derivative, executed with atomic settlement via an RFQ protocol's private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-principal-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Workflow Divergence in Practice

The practical execution workflow for an RFQ differs significantly between the two models. A trader’s operational setup must be able to accommodate both pathways to optimize execution strategy across different scenarios.

- **Initiation**

<li>**SI Workflow** The trader’s Order Management System (OMS) or Execution Management System (EMS) sends a targeted RFQ directly to one or more selected SIs. Each RFQ is a discrete, bilateral request.

- **OTF Workflow** The trader’s system sends a single RFQ to the OTF venue. The OTF then disseminates this request to its network of connected liquidity providers according to its established protocols.

</li>
- **Quotation**

<li>**SI Workflow** The SI responds with a firm quote, committing its own capital. The price is based on its internal pricing models and current risk positions.

- **OTF Workflow** Multiple liquidity providers respond with their own quotes. These quotes are routed back to the trader through the OTF platform, creating a consolidated view of the competitive landscape.

</li>
- **Execution**

<li>**SI Workflow** The trader executes against the SI’s quote. The trade is a principal transaction between the client and the SI. The SI is then responsible for post-trade reporting.

- **OTF Workflow** The trader selects the best quote and executes. The trade is between the client and the winning liquidity provider, with the OTF acting as the executing venue and handling reporting obligations.

</li>

![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

![A precision sphere, an Execution Management System EMS, probes a Digital Asset Liquidity Pool. This signifies High-Fidelity Execution via Smart Order Routing for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-orchestrating-global-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-pool-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The theoretical and strategic [distinctions between Systematic Internalisers](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-distinctions-between-a-vendors-response-to-an-rfq-and-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and Organised Trading Facilities materialize at the point of execution. For the institutional trader, this is where [market structure](https://prime.greeks.live/guide/case-study-how-a-market-maker-prices-a-complex-options-structure-via-rfq/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) translates into tangible outcomes in terms of price, risk, and efficiency. Mastering the execution mechanics of RFQ workflows on both SI and OTF platforms requires a deep understanding of the underlying protocols, transparency obligations, and the quantitative realities of liquidity interaction in each environment. The ultimate goal is to build an execution framework that can dynamically select the optimal path based on the specific characteristics of the order and prevailing market conditions.

![A sophisticated, multi-component system propels a sleek, teal-colored digital asset derivative trade. The complex internal structure represents a proprietary RFQ protocol engine with liquidity aggregation and price discovery mechanisms](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Dimensions of RFQ Execution

The performance of an RFQ workflow is measurable. Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as fill probability, price improvement versus a benchmark, and execution latency are all affected by the choice of venue. The following table presents a hypothetical analysis of two execution scenarios for a corporate bond trade, illustrating the quantitative differences that can emerge between an SI and an OTF workflow. This data-driven perspective is essential for constructing a robust best execution policy.

| Metric | Scenario A ▴ SI Execution | Scenario B ▴ OTF Execution |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Instrument | XYZ Corp 4.5% 2030 Bond | XYZ Corp 4.5% 2030 Bond |
| Trade Size (Nominal) | €15,000,000 | €15,000,000 |
| Benchmark Price (Mid) | 101.250 | 101.250 |
| Number of Counterparties Queried | 1 (Direct RFQ to a known SI) | 5 (RFQ submitted to the OTF, which routes to 5 dealers) |
| Number of Quotes Received | 1 | 4 (1 dealer declined to quote) |
| Best Quoted Price (Offer) | 101.280 | 101.270 |
| Worst Quoted Price (Offer) | 101.280 | 101.295 |
| Execution Price | 101.280 | 101.270 |
| Price Improvement vs. Benchmark | -3.0 bps | -2.0 bps |
| Information Footprint | Low (Only the SI is aware of the inquiry) | Medium (5 dealers are aware of the inquiry) |
| Post-Trade Reporting Duty | Systematic Internaliser | Organised Trading Facility |

This quantitative illustration highlights the core trade-off. The OTF execution (Scenario B) achieved a better price ▴ 1 basis point of improvement ▴ due to the competitive tension among the four responding dealers. However, this came at the cost of a larger information footprint.

The SI execution (Scenario A) was less competitive on price but offered complete control over information leakage. For a less liquid bond or a more sensitive strategy, avoiding market impact might be worth more than the single basis point of price improvement.

![A sleek, light-colored, egg-shaped component precisely connects to a darker, ergonomic base, signifying high-fidelity integration. This modular design embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for atomic settlement and best execution within a robust Principal's operational framework, enhancing market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-principal-system.jpg)

## The Mechanics of Transparency and Reporting

A critical component of the execution process is the application of MiFID II’s transparency regime. Both SIs and OTFs are subject to these rules, but their obligations manifest differently, impacting the execution strategy.

![Abstract geometric forms portray a dark circular digital asset derivative or liquidity pool on a light plane. Sharp lines and a teal surface with a triangular shadow symbolize market microstructure, RFQ protocol execution, and algorithmic trading precision for institutional grade block trades and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Pre-Trade Transparency

The obligation for an SI to make its quotes public is a cornerstone of the regime, intended to bring light to internalized liquidity. For liquid instruments, an SI must provide firm quotes when requested by a client. This provides a degree of certainty. In practice, for many non-equity instruments that are not deemed liquid, this obligation shifts to providing quotes to clients upon request.

An OTF’s RFQ system, by contrast, typically operates under a waiver, meaning the quotes are only visible to the parties involved in the request. The strategic implication is that engaging an SI may contribute more to public price discovery, while an OTF RFQ is a more contained, private negotiation among a select group.

![A spherical Liquidity Pool is bisected by a metallic diagonal bar, symbolizing an RFQ Protocol and its Market Microstructure. Imperfections on the bar represent Slippage challenges in High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization-within-principals-market-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Post-Trade Transparency

Once a trade is executed, both SIs and OTFs have a responsibility to make the details of that trade public, typically through an Approved Publication Arrangement (APA). This includes the price, volume, and time of the transaction. The key operational difference is who holds the reporting responsibility. When trading with an SI, the SI is responsible for the trade report.

When trading on an OTF, the OTF itself is responsible. This simplifies the operational burden for the buy-side firm, but it is crucial to have processes in place to verify that the reporting has been done correctly. Deferrals in publication are permitted for large-in-scale trades, a vital mechanism that allows market participants to execute large blocks without immediate market impact. The execution strategy for a large trade must therefore consider the rules around these deferrals and how they differ between venue types.

> Execution mastery requires aligning the choice of venue with the specific quantitative goals of the trade, whether that is prioritizing price improvement through competition or minimizing market impact through discretion.

Ultimately, the execution of [RFQ workflows](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflows/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in the modern European market structure is a function of a firm’s technological capabilities and its strategic sophistication. A truly advanced execution framework does not have a static preference for SIs or OTFs. Instead, it maintains connectivity to a diverse range of both, supported by a data analysis capability that allows it to learn from every trade.

This system would analyze the outcomes of RFQs based on instrument type, size, time of day, and market volatility, building a dynamic picture of where the highest quality of execution can be found at any given moment. This is the operational reality of best execution ▴ a continuous, data-driven process of venue selection and performance analysis.

![The central teal core signifies a Principal's Prime RFQ, routing RFQ protocols across modular arms. Metallic levers denote precise control over multi-leg spread execution and block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-prime-os-rfq-system-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## References

- European Securities and Markets Authority. (2021). MiFID II/MiFIR review report on the transparency regime for non-equity instruments and the trading obligation for derivatives. ESMA70-156-4231.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. (2021). Review of EU MiFID II/ MiFIR Framework ▴ The pre-trade transparency and Systematic Internalisers regimes for OTC derivatives.

- SmartStream Technologies. (2018). Systematic Internalisation Under MiFID II ▴ What’s Needed Now. White Paper.

- International Capital Market Association. (2016). MiFID II/R Systematic Internalisers for bond markets.

- Grant Thornton. (2017). MiFID II implementation ▴ the Systematic Internaliser regime.

- Camilleri, S. J. & Gortsos, C. V. (2018). The new European framework for the regulation of financial markets (MiFID II and MiFIR). European Company and Financial Law Review, 15(1), 1-4.

- Lehmann, M. (2019). The Law of FinTech ▴ The Example of Virtual Currencies and of Crowdfunding. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of the Sharing Economy. Cambridge University Press.

- Avgouleas, E. (2017). The Regulation of Capital Markets in the EU ▴ The Rocky Road from Harmonisation to Integration. In The New Financial Architecture in the Eurozone. Cambridge University Press.

![A chrome cross-shaped central processing unit rests on a textured surface, symbolizing a Principal's institutional grade execution engine. It integrates multi-leg options strategies and RFQ protocols, leveraging real-time order book dynamics for optimal price discovery in digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage and maximizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-hub.jpg)

## Reflection

The granular distinctions between [Systematic Internalisers](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-systematic-internalisers-affect-liquidity-fragmentation-in-european-markets/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and Organised Trading Facilities provide the essential components for constructing a sophisticated execution policy. Viewing these not as interchangeable venues but as specialized instruments with distinct performance characteristics is the first step. The ultimate configuration of an institutional workflow depends on a clear-eyed assessment of its own priorities.

Is the primary driver the mitigation of information leakage for large, sensitive orders, or is it the relentless pursuit of price improvement through competitive pressure? There is no single, correct answer.

The knowledge of these structures empowers a firm to move beyond a reactive stance on execution. It allows for the proactive design of a system that routes orders with intent, leveraging the bilateral certainty of an SI for one trade and the multilateral competition of an OTF for the next. This operational dexterity, grounded in a deep understanding of market mechanics, is the foundation upon which a durable strategic advantage is built. The final question, therefore, is how these tools are integrated into a firm’s own unique operational architecture to achieve its specific capital efficiency and risk management goals.

![A central metallic RFQ engine anchors radiating segmented panels, symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and market segments. Varying shades denote distinct execution venues within the complex market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives with minimal slippage and latency via high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-nexus.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/organised-trading-facility/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective planes and intersecting elements depict institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central Principal-driven RFQ protocol ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision.jpg)

## Organised Trading Facility

Meaning ▴ An Organised Trading Facility (OTF) represents a specific type of multilateral system, as defined under MiFID II, designed for the trading of non-equity instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systematic-internaliser/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract intersecting geometric forms, deep blue and light beige, represent advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms signify multi-leg execution strategies, principal liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic pricing against a textured global market sphere, reflecting robust market microstructure and intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-execution-algorithmic-pricing-global-liquidity-principal-trading-systemic-integration-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Systematic Internaliser

Meaning ▴ A Systematic Internaliser (SI) is a financial institution executing client orders against its own capital on an organized, frequent, systematic basis off-exchange. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-role-do-non-bank-liquidity-providers-play-in-offering-deep-liquidity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

## Liquidity Providers

Non-bank liquidity providers function as specialized processing units in the market's architecture, offering deep, automated liquidity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-dealers-system-differentiate-between-an-rfq-from-an-informed-client-versus-an-uninformed-client/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Client Orders

A dealer's system differentiates clients by using a dynamic scoring model that analyzes behavioral history and RFQ context to quantify adverse selection risk. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/post-trade-transparency/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Post-Trade Transparency

Meaning ▴ Post-Trade Transparency defines the public disclosure of executed transaction details, encompassing price, volume, and timestamp, after a trade has been completed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precisely engineered multi-component structure, split to reveal its granular core, symbolizes the complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor represents the unbundling of multi-leg spreads, facilitating transparent price discovery and high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-revealing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-within-principals-operational-framework.jpg)

## Mifid Ii

Meaning ▴ MiFID II, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, constitutes a comprehensive regulatory framework enacted by the European Union to govern financial markets, investment firms, and trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central reflective sphere, representing a Principal's algorithmic trading core, rests within a luminous liquidity pool, intersected by a precise execution bar. This visualizes price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, reflecting market microstructure optimization within an institutional grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Rfq Workflow

Meaning ▴ The RFQ Workflow defines a structured, programmatic process for a principal to solicit actionable price quotations from a pre-defined set of liquidity providers for a specific financial instrument and notional quantity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-equity-instruments/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central Prime RFQ core powers institutional digital asset derivatives. Translucent conduits signify high-fidelity execution and smart order routing for RFQ block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-engine.jpg)

## Non-Equity Instruments

Meaning ▴ Non-equity instruments are financial contracts or securities that do not confer ownership interest in an issuing entity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-machine-learning-models-be-used-to-predict-and-mitigate-rfq-information-leakage-in-real-time-2/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-component device with a dark blue base and beige bands culminates in a sophisticated top mechanism. This precision instrument symbolizes a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating RFQ protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/advanced-mechanism-for-principal-trading-firm-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Information Leakage

Machine learning models systematically predict and mitigate RFQ information leakage by transforming trade data into actionable, real-time risk scores. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-multilateral-trading-facility-and-an-organised-trading-facility/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

## Organised Trading

An MTF is a non-discretionary venue for all assets; an OTF is a discretionary venue for non-equities, offering bespoke execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-single-fix-message-initiate-an-rfq-to-multiple-liquidity-providers-simultaneously/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp, teal blade precisely dissects a cylindrical conduit. This visualizes surgical high-fidelity execution of block trades for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Multiple Liquidity Providers

A single command within an Execution Management System initiates a multi-dealer RFQ by architecting parallel FIX conversations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/could-a-different-market-structure-achieve-both-price-improvement-and-efficient-price-discovery-simultaneously/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic structures with glowing apertures symbolize institutional RFQ protocols. These represent high-fidelity execution and price discovery across aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-systems-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Price Improvement

A system can achieve both goals by using private, competitive negotiation for execution and public post-trade reporting for discovery. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two reflective, disc-like structures, one tilted, one flat, symbolize the Market Microstructure of Digital Asset Derivatives. This metaphor encapsulates RFQ Protocols and High-Fidelity Execution within a Liquidity Pool for Price Discovery, vital for a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-optimizing-market-microstructure-principal-trading-best-execution-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-distinctions-between-a-vendors-response-to-an-rfq-and-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-layered, institutional-grade device, poised with a beige base, dark blue core, and an angled mint green intelligence layer. This signifies a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and capital efficiency within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-intelligence.jpg)

## Distinctions between Systematic Internalisers

An RFQ response is a binding price offer; an RFP response is a negotiable strategic proposal. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/guide/case-study-how-a-market-maker-prices-a-complex-options-structure-via-rfq/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric structure with sharp angles and translucent planes, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. The central point signifies a core RFQ protocol engine, enabling precise price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg options strategies, crucial for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-operational-framework-optimizing-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-for-alpha-generation.jpg)

## Market Structure

Execute complex options structures with institutional precision through the Request for Quote system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflows/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two intersecting technical arms, one opaque metallic and one transparent blue with internal glowing patterns, pivot around a central hub. This symbolizes a Principal's RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

## Rfq Workflows

Meaning ▴ RFQ Workflows define structured, automated processes for soliciting executable price quotes from designated liquidity providers for digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-systematic-internalisers-affect-liquidity-fragmentation-in-european-markets/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, illuminated object, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol or Execution Management System, precisely intersects two broad surfaces representing liquidity pools within market microstructure. Its glowing line indicates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives, ensuring best execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-price-discovery-alpha-generation.jpg)

## Systematic Internalisers

Systematic Internalisers re-architect European liquidity, offering price improvement at the cost of increased market fragmentation and informational asymmetry. </a>

**Tags:** [Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-execution/), [Organised Trading Facility](https://options.greeks.live/area/organised-trading-facility/), [MiFID II](https://options.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/), [RFQ Workflows](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflows/), [RFQ Workflow](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflow/), [Systematic Internaliser](https://options.greeks.live/area/systematic-internaliser/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Have Regulatory Frameworks like MiFID II Influenced the Adoption and Technical Structure of RFQ Platforms in Europe?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-have-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influenced-the-adoption-and-technical-structure-of-rfq-platforms-in-europe/)
![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols, enabling precise price discovery within complex market microstructure for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

MiFID II has systemically driven RFQ platform adoption by mandating auditable best execution and market transparency.

- 
### [How Does the Role of a Systematic Internaliser Differ from an OTF in Managing RFQ Data?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-role-of-a-systematic-internaliser-differ-from-an-otf-in-managing-rfq-data/)
![Abstractly depicting an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS component. Its robust structure and metallic interface signify precise Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution of RFQ Protocol and Block Trade orders. The angular teal plane represents a transparent Liquidity Pool driving Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-integrated-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

A Systematic Internaliser is a principal-trading entity executing client orders bilaterally, while an OTF is an agency-based multilateral venue facilitating competitive quoting.

- 
### [What Are the Specific Compliance and Reporting Differences between MTFs and OTFs under MiFIR?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-specific-compliance-and-reporting-differences-between-mtfs-and-otfs-under-mifir/)
![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

MTFs offer non-discretionary, rules-based execution, while OTFs provide a regulated framework for discretionary trading in non-equity markets.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between a Systematic Internaliser and a Dark Pool under MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-a-systematic-internaliser-and-a-dark-pool-under-mifid-ii/)
![A polished, dark blue domed component, symbolizing a private quotation interface, rests on a gleaming silver ring. This represents a robust Prime RFQ framework, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It facilitates block trades with optimized capital efficiency and minimal slippage via a sophisticated RFQ protocol.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/optimized-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

A Systematic Internaliser is a bilateral principal trading venue with quoting duties; a dark pool is a multilateral agency venue for anonymous order matching.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Differentiate between MTFs and OTFs for Trading?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-differentiate-between-mtfs-and-otfs-for-trading/)
![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

MiFID II differentiates MTFs and OTFs by execution method: MTFs are non-discretionary, automated systems; OTFs permit operator discretion.

- 
### [How Do OTFs Differ from MTFs in the Context of Bond Trading?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-otfs-differ-from-mtfs-in-the-context-of-bond-trading/)
![A reflective circular surface captures dynamic market microstructure data, poised above a stable institutional-grade platform. A smooth, teal dome, symbolizing a digital asset derivative or specific block trade RFQ, signifies high-fidelity execution and optimized price discovery on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

OTFs differ from MTFs by permitting operator discretion and matched-principal trading to facilitate liquidity in non-equity markets.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Regulatory Considerations When Automating the RFQ Workflow under MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-regulatory-considerations-when-automating-the-rfq-workflow-under-mifid-ii/)
![A futuristic system component with a split design and intricate central element, embodying advanced RFQ protocols. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and granular market microstructure control for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing liquidity provision and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

Automating the RFQ workflow under MiFID II requires engineering a system for demonstrable best execution through a complete, auditable data trail.

- 
### [How Do the Obligations for a Systematic Internaliser Differ from Other Investment Firms?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-the-obligations-for-a-systematic-internaliser-differ-from-other-investment-firms/)
![Robust metallic structures, one blue-tinted, one teal, intersect, covered in granular water droplets. This depicts a principal's institutional RFQ framework facilitating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating deep liquidity pools for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives for enhanced capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A Systematic Internaliser's obligations are defined by principal risk and mandatory quote transparency, unlike other firms.

- 
### [What Are the Key Architectural Differences between a Compliant and a Non-Compliant RFQ Platform?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-architectural-differences-between-a-compliant-and-a-non-compliant-rfq-platform/)
![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

A compliant RFQ platform is an immutable system of record; a non-compliant one is a discretionary communication channel.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Key Differences between a Systematic Internaliser and an OTF for RFQ Workflows?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-systematic-internaliser-and-an-otf-for-rfq-workflows/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-systematic-internaliser-and-an-otf-for-rfq-workflows/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Key Differences between a Systematic Internaliser and an OTF for RFQ Workflows? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An SI is a principal-based, bilateral counterparty, while an OTF is a discretionary, multilateral execution venue for RFQs. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-systematic-internaliser-and-an-otf-for-rfq-workflows/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-17T08:53:06+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-17T08:53:08+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-connectivity-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "Precision-engineered system components converge at a vibrant blue interface, depicting a sophisticated Principal-to-Principal trading environment. This visualizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution of block trades and multi-leg spreads. The Prime RFQ minimizes latency and prevents information leakage, optimizing market microstructure and capital efficiency by aggregating dark liquidity for best execution."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best Execution",
        "Corporate Bonds",
        "Derivatives Trading",
        "Liquidity Provision",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "Matched Principal",
        "MiFID II",
        "Non-Equity Instruments",
        "Organised Trading Facility",
        "Post-Trade Transparency",
        "Pre-Trade Transparency",
        "Principal Trading",
        "RFQ Workflow",
        "RFQ Workflows",
        "Systematic Internaliser"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-systematic-internaliser-and-an-otf-for-rfq-workflows/
