# What Are the Key Differences between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements for Asian Counterparties? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-01
**Categories:** Question

---

![A translucent teal dome, brimming with luminous particles, symbolizes a dynamic liquidity pool within an RFQ protocol. Precisely mounted metallic hardware signifies high-fidelity execution and the core intelligence layer for institutional digital asset derivatives, underpinned by granular market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-intelligence-layer.jpg)

![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The decision between the 1992 and 2002 International [Swaps and Derivatives](https://prime.greeks.live/area/swaps-and-derivatives/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Association (ISDA) Master Agreements is a foundational architectural choice in constructing a robust risk management framework. For institutions engaging with [Asian counterparties](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-operational-risks-associated-with-the-transition-to-t1-for-asian-and-european-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), this selection transcends mere legal preference; it defines the operational protocols, risk parameters, and crisis-response mechanisms within a uniquely diverse and dynamic market landscape. The 2002 Agreement represents a systemic upgrade, engineered in response to the market stresses of the late 1990s, which exposed the vulnerabilities of its predecessor. It functions as a more rigid, responsive, and standardized operating system for managing counterparty risk, replacing the more flexible, yet often ambiguous, protocols of the 1992 version.

Viewing these agreements as systems architecture reveals their core purpose ▴ to provide a predictable, enforceable, and efficient process for managing and closing out derivatives exposures. The 1992 Agreement provided a choice of termination payment methodologies, a feature that offered flexibility but introduced significant uncertainty during periods of market illiquidity. The 2002 Agreement eliminated this ambiguity by instituting a single, more resilient calculation method, the [Close-out Amount](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

This shift reflects a fundamental change in design philosophy from bespoke negotiation to standardized process, a critical evolution for counterparties operating across the varied legal and economic jurisdictions of Asia. The enhanced architecture of the 2002 version is engineered to process defaults and termination events with greater speed and certainty, a feature whose value is magnified when navigating the complexities of cross-border transactions involving different time zones, currencies, and regulatory regimes.

> The choice between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements dictates the fundamental architecture of an institution’s counterparty risk management system.

For Asian counterparties, the implications of this architectural choice are profound. The region’s markets are characterized by a wide spectrum of liquidity profiles, from the deep, highly developed markets of Japan and Hong Kong to the more restricted and emerging markets for certain currencies and asset classes. The 1992 Agreement’s reliance on obtaining multiple dealer quotes for its [Market Quotation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) methodology could prove impractical or lead to commercially unreasonable outcomes in less liquid [Asian markets](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-operational-risks-associated-with-the-transition-to-t1-for-asian-and-european-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

The 2002 Agreement’s Close-out Amount was specifically designed to function effectively in such stressed or illiquid conditions, making it a structurally more reliable system for managing risk in these environments. Furthermore, the 2002 Agreement’s expanded view of counterparty default provides a more holistic risk picture, an essential tool for evaluating entities within the complex corporate structures often found in Asia.

![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

![Glowing teal conduit symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and real-time market microstructure data flow for digital asset derivatives. Smooth grey spheres represent aggregated liquidity pools and robust counterparty risk management within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Strategy

A strategic analysis of the 1992 and 2002 ISDA [Master Agreements](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) reveals a clear trajectory toward greater automation and certainty in [risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The modifications in the 2002 version are not merely incremental adjustments; they are strategic enhancements designed to create a more resilient and predictable system for handling counterparty defaults and other termination events. For firms with significant exposure to Asian markets, understanding the strategic implications of these changes is essential for aligning their legal documentation with their operational and risk management objectives.

![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

## The Close out Calculation a Systemic Upgrade

The most significant strategic difference lies in the methodology for calculating payments upon [early termination](https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The 1992 Agreement offered a choice between two distinct protocols ▴ Market Quotation and Loss. The 2002 Agreement replaced this dual-track system with a single, unified protocol ▴ the Close-out Amount.

- **Market Quotation** under the 1992 Agreement required the terminating party to obtain quotes from several leading dealers for replacement transactions. This protocol was designed to provide an objective, market-based valuation. Its structural weakness became apparent in illiquid or volatile markets, such as those experienced during the 1998 Asian financial crisis, where obtaining the requisite number of quotes was often impossible, leading to delays and disputes.

- **Loss** provided an alternative based on the principle of general indemnification. The terminating party could determine its total gains and losses in [good faith](https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This offered immense flexibility, a strategic advantage for a party confident in its ability to manage a workout. This subjectivity, however, could be a significant disadvantage for the defaulting party, which had little transparency into the calculation.

- **Close-out Amount** in the 2002 Agreement is a hybrid protocol. It was engineered to combine the objectivity of [market data](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-data/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) with the flexibility needed to operate in stressed conditions. It allows the determining party to use a wide range of information, including third-party quotes, relevant market data, and internal models, while imposing a duty of commercial reasonableness. This makes the system more resilient and adaptable, particularly in Asian markets where liquidity for certain products can be thin and obtaining firm quotes is challenging.

> The 2002 Agreement’s Close-out Amount provides a more robust and flexible valuation mechanism, crucial for navigating the diverse liquidity profiles of Asian markets.

For a counterparty in Seoul dealing in Korean Won NDFs, for instance, the Close-out Amount provides a more reliable termination process than trying to source multiple, binding quotes for a replacement transaction from a limited pool of market makers, as the 1992 Market Quotation method would require.

![Metallic, reflective components depict high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. A central circular element symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivative, like a Bitcoin option, processed via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## How Do Default Protocols Differ?

The 2002 Agreement recalibrated the triggers and timelines for default, creating a system that responds more rapidly to signs of counterparty distress. These changes have direct strategic consequences for managing credit risk with Asian counterparties.

The grace period for a failure to pay was reduced from three Local Business Days after notice under the 1992 version to just one Local Business Day in the 2002 version. This acceleration compresses the response window, demanding highly efficient operational processes for payments and reconciliations, a particular challenge when managing relationships across multiple Asian time zones. Strategically, it allows the non-defaulting party to act decisively, reducing its exposure to a deteriorating credit.

A critical strategic enhancement in the [2002 ISDA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the expansion of the “[Specified Transaction](https://prime.greeks.live/area/specified-transaction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” definition. The 1992 definition was limited to traditional derivatives. The 2002 version broadened this to include repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and other similar financial instruments. This creates a more comprehensive, though still limited, cross-default provision.

An institution can now terminate its derivatives portfolio if its counterparty defaults on a repo or securities lending agreement between them. This provides a more holistic view of the counterparty’s financial health, a vital strategic tool when dealing with large, complex Asian conglomerates with financing activities spread across multiple business lines.

![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Force Majeure a New Risk Module

The 2002 Agreement introduced a [Force Majeure](https://prime.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Termination Event, a direct response to the events of September 11, 2001, but with broad strategic relevance for Asian markets. This provision allows for the termination of transactions if an event beyond a party’s control makes performance impossible or impracticable. For Asia, a region subject to significant geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, and the potential for sudden, prohibitive government actions like the imposition of capital controls, the Force Majeure clause is a critical risk management module. It provides a structured, contractual off-ramp in situations where performance is disrupted by external shocks, offering a degree of certainty that was absent in the 1992 framework.

### Strategic Comparison Of ISDA Agreement Versions

| Feature | 1992 ISDA Master Agreement | 2002 ISDA Master Agreement | Strategic Implication for Asian Counterparties |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Termination Calculation | Choice of Market Quotation or Loss. | Single method ▴ Close-out Amount. | The 2002 version provides greater certainty and workability in less liquid or volatile Asian markets where obtaining multiple quotes is difficult. |
| Payment Grace Period | Three Local Business Days after notice. | One Local Business Day after notice. | The shorter 2002 period requires more efficient operations but allows for faster action against a defaulting counterparty, reducing risk exposure. |
| Cross-Default Scope | Limited to derivatives under “Specified Transaction.” | “Specified Transaction” expanded to include repos, securities lending, etc. | The 2002 Agreement provides a more holistic view of counterparty risk, which is valuable when dealing with complex Asian corporate structures. |
| Impossibility Event | No specific provision; relies on Illegality. | New Force Majeure Termination Event. | The 2002 clause offers a clearer path for termination due to geopolitical events, natural disasters, or sudden regulatory changes common in the region. |
| Set-Off | No standard provision; added in Schedule. | Standardized set-off provision in Section 6(f). | The 2002 version provides contractual certainty for netting, though enforceability still depends on local insolvency laws in each Asian jurisdiction. |

![Two robust modules, a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, connect via a central RFQ protocol mechanism. This system enables high-fidelity execution, price discovery, atomic settlement for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-engine.jpg)

![Precision-engineered metallic discs, interconnected by a central spindle, against a deep void, symbolize the core architecture of an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. This setup facilitates private quotation, robust portfolio margin, and high-fidelity execution, optimizing market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-infrastructure.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a derivatives strategy with Asian counterparties requires a granular understanding of how the choice between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements translates into operational reality. The legal architecture must be supported by robust internal processes, from credit monitoring to collateral management. The following provides an operational playbook for navigating this critical decision and implementing the chosen framework.

![A transparent, blue-tinted sphere, anchored to a metallic base on a light surface, symbolizes an RFQ inquiry for digital asset derivatives. A fine line represents low-latency FIX Protocol for high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery in market microstructure via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-rfq-protocol-sphere-high-fidelity-execution-gateway.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Agreement Selection

Selecting the appropriate ISDA architecture is a decision that should be guided by a systematic analysis of both your institution’s capabilities and your counterparty’s profile. A standardized approach may seem efficient, but a tailored execution strategy is superior. Consider the following factors in a decision matrix:

- **Counterparty Jurisdiction and Legal Framework** What is the enforceability of close-out netting and set-off in the counterparty’s home jurisdiction? Jurisdictions like Singapore and Hong Kong have highly developed legal frameworks aligned with international standards. Other jurisdictions may present greater uncertainty. The clarity and standardized nature of the 2002 Agreement’s provisions may be preferable when dealing with jurisdictions where the legal treatment of derivatives is less tested.

- **Counterparty Credit Profile** Is the counterparty a highly-rated financial institution or a less transparent corporate entity? For a stronger credit, the flexibility of the 1992 Agreement’s “Loss” calculation might be acceptable. For a weaker or more opaque credit, the procedural rigor and objectivity of the 2002 Agreement’s “Close-out Amount” and tighter default triggers are operationally superior.

- **Transaction Complexity and Liquidity** Are you trading highly liquid G7 currency swaps or illiquid, long-dated exotic options on an Asian currency? For illiquid products, the 1992 Agreement’s “Market Quotation” is operationally hazardous. The 2002 “Close-out Amount” is specifically engineered to handle such scenarios, making it the only prudent choice for such trades.

- **Internal Operational Capacity** Can your back-office and legal teams consistently meet the accelerated one-day grace period for payments under the 2002 Agreement? This requires seamless coordination across time zones. A failure to meet these deadlines due to operational friction could inadvertently put your own institution in default.

![Abstract spheres on a fulcrum symbolize Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. A small white sphere represents a multi-leg spread, balanced by a large reflective blue sphere for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-dynamic-balance-for-optimal-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Impact Analysis a Close out Scenario

To understand the financial consequences of the architectural choice, consider a hypothetical default scenario. A Hong Kong-based fund defaults on its obligations to a Singaporean bank. The portfolio consists of a single, out-of-the-money USD/CNH cross-currency swap.

### Hypothetical Close Out Scenario HK Fund Default

| Action / Methodology | 1992 ISDA (Market Quotation) | 1992 ISDA (Loss) | 2002 ISDA (Close-out Amount) | Commentary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial Step | Bank must seek quotes from 3-4 reference market-makers for a replacement swap. | Bank calculates its total losses and gains in good faith. | Bank determines the close-out amount using commercially reasonable procedures. | The 2002 process is the most flexible from the outset. |
| Market Condition | High volatility in CNH market; only two dealers provide firm quotes. | Bank can use its own internal model to value the swap. | Bank can use the two dealer quotes, its own internal model, and other market data (e.g. volatility surfaces). | The 1992 Market Quotation fails here. The process would default to the “Loss” method, assuming the parties elected it as a fallback. |
| Calculation Outcome | Process fails. If Loss is the fallback, the outcome is the same as the next column. If not, potential for legal dispute is high. | Bank’s internal model shows a loss of $1.5M. The calculation lacks transparency for the defaulting fund. | Bank synthesizes data to arrive at a commercially reasonable value of $1.4M. The process is documented and auditable. | The 2002 outcome is defensible and grounded in a wider set of inputs, reducing the likelihood of a successful legal challenge. |
| Enforceability | High risk of dispute due to procedural failure. | Risk of dispute over the “good faith” determination and the inputs to the bank’s model. | Lower risk of dispute due to the explicit permission to use multiple sources and the overarching standard of commercial reasonableness. | In a sophisticated jurisdiction like Singapore or Hong Kong, the 2002 methodology provides a stronger basis for enforcement. |

![A central metallic bar, representing an RFQ block trade, pivots through translucent geometric planes symbolizing dynamic liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. This illustrates a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing private quotation workflows](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-facilitating-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-optimal-capital-efficiency-within-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## What Are Key Drafting Considerations for the Schedule?

Regardless of the version chosen, the ISDA Schedule is where the agreement is tailored to the specific relationship. For Asian counterparties, several clauses require meticulous drafting.

- **Governing Law and Jurisdiction** While New York and English law remain standard, specifying a sophisticated Asian jurisdiction like the Singapore International Commercial Court or the Hong Kong courts can be a strategic choice. This can simplify enforcement against a local counterparty’s assets.

- **Additional Termination Events (ATEs)** The ATEs should be tailored to regional risks. This could include a “Capital Controls” ATE, triggered if a government restricts the outflow of currency, or an ATE linked to the credit rating of a parent guarantor, a common feature of Asian corporate structures.

- **Credit Support Documents** The choice of [Credit Support Annex](https://prime.greeks.live/area/credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CSA) and the specifics of eligible collateral are critical. When dealing with counterparties in certain Asian jurisdictions, it may be necessary to restrict eligible collateral to cash or highly liquid government bonds held with a neutral, third-party custodian to mitigate local enforcement risk.

![Detailed metallic disc, a Prime RFQ core, displays etched market microstructure. Its central teal dome, an intelligence layer, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

## References

- Charles, GuyLaine. “The ISDA Master Agreement ▴ Part II ▴ Negotiated Provisions.” _Practical Compliance & Risk Management for the Securities Industry_, May-June 2012.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “Comparison of 1992 and 2002 ISDA® Master Agreements.” _Practical Law Practice Note 3-506-3774_, Thomson Reuters, 2025.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “User’s Guide to the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement.” ISDA Publications, 2003.

- PricewaterhouseCoopers. “The ISDA Master Agreements.” Appendix 1 to an Expert Report, Date Unknown.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “1992 ISDA Master Agreement.” ISDA Publications, 1992.

- LexisNexis. “ISDA Documentation ▴ Comparison of the 1992 and 2002 Master Agreements.” Lexis Practice Note, Date Unknown.

- Practical Law Finance. “Comparison of 1992 and 2002 ISDA® Master Agreements.” Practical Law UK Practice Note 3-592-3646, Thomson Reuters, Date Unknown.

![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Reflection

The analysis of the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements moves beyond a simple legal comparison into the realm of strategic systems design. The selection and negotiation of this foundational document is an act of architectural planning for your firm’s risk management infrastructure. Each clause, from the calculation of the termination amount to the definition of a default, represents a protocol that will govern your institution’s response in times of market stress.

Consider your current documentation framework not as a collection of static legal agreements, but as a dynamic operating system. Does this system possess the resilience, responsiveness, and clarity required to navigate the complexities of the modern financial landscape, particularly the diverse and rapidly evolving markets of Asia? Is your framework designed proactively, based on a deep understanding of systemic risks, or has it been assembled reactively, in response to past crises? The ultimate strategic advantage lies in building an operational and legal architecture that is not just compliant, but intelligently designed to protect capital and enable opportunities with precision and control.

![Abstract geometric forms, symbolizing bilateral quotation and multi-leg spread components, precisely interact with robust institutional-grade infrastructure. This represents a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating high-fidelity execution via an RFQ workflow, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-infrastructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/swaps-and-derivatives/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract intersecting geometric forms, deep blue and light beige, represent advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms signify multi-leg execution strategies, principal liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic pricing against a textured global market sphere, reflecting robust market microstructure and intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-execution-algorithmic-pricing-global-liquidity-principal-trading-systemic-integration-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Swaps and Derivatives

Meaning ▴ Swaps and derivatives, within the sophisticated crypto financial landscape, are contractual instruments whose value is derived from the price performance of an underlying cryptocurrency asset, index, or rate. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-operational-risks-associated-with-the-transition-to-t1-for-asian-and-european-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A light sphere, representing a Principal's digital asset, is integrated into an angular blue RFQ protocol framework. Sharp fins symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-core-asset-rfq-protocol-framework-for-digital-derivatives.jpg)

## Asian Counterparties

The primary operational risk of T+1 for non-US firms is the systemic failure cascade caused by temporal asynchronicity in global markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A macro view reveals a robust metallic component, signifying a critical interface within a Prime RFQ. This secure mechanism facilitates precise RFQ protocol execution, enabling atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives, embodying high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-secure-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-trade-system-element.jpg)

## Close-Out Amount

Meaning ▴ The Close-Out Amount represents the aggregated net sum due between two parties upon the early termination or default of a master agreement, encompassing all outstanding obligations across multiple transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract machinery visualizes an institutional RFQ protocol engine, demonstrating high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. It depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and sophisticated algorithmic trading, crucial for prime brokerage capital efficiency and optimal market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Market Quotation

Meaning ▴ A market quotation, or simply a quote, represents the most recent price at which an asset has traded or, more commonly in active markets, the current best bid and ask prices at which it can be immediately bought or sold. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-operational-risks-associated-with-the-transition-to-t1-for-asian-and-european-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A symmetrical, intricate digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its metallic and translucent elements visualize a robust RFQ protocol facilitating multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

## Asian Markets

The primary operational risk of T+1 for non-US firms is the systemic failure cascade caused by temporal asynchronicity in global markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic structural component interlocks with two black, dome-shaped modules, each displaying a green data indicator. This signifies a dynamic RFQ protocol within an institutional Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os.jpg)

## Master Agreements

The 2002 ISDA is a protocol upgrade enhancing systemic stability via a unified close-out mechanism and expanded default definitions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Risk Management, within the cryptocurrency trading domain, encompasses the comprehensive process of identifying, assessing, monitoring, and mitigating the multifaceted financial, operational, and technological exposures inherent in digital asset markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central translucent disk, representing a Liquidity Pool or RFQ Hub, is intersected by a precision Execution Engine bar. Its core, an Intelligence Layer, signifies dynamic Price Discovery and Algorithmic Trading logic for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-visualizing-microstructure.jpg)

## Early Termination

Meaning ▴ Early Termination, within the framework of crypto financial instruments, denotes the contractual right or obligation to conclude a derivative or lending agreement prior to its originally stipulated maturity date. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two interlocking textured bars, beige and blue, abstractly represent institutional digital asset derivatives platforms. A blue sphere signifies RFQ protocol initiation, reflecting latent liquidity for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-for-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Good Faith

Meaning ▴ Good Faith, within the intricate and often trust-minimized architecture of crypto financial systems, denotes the principle of honest intent, fair dealing, and transparent conduct in all participant interactions and contractual agreements. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-data/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central control knob on a metallic platform, bisected by sharp reflective lines, embodies an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts intricate market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery for multi-leg options, and robust Prime RFQ deployment, optimizing latent liquidity across digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Market Data

Meaning ▴ Market data in crypto investing refers to the real-time or historical information regarding prices, volumes, order book depth, and other relevant metrics across various digital asset trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/specified-transaction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizes the core mechanism of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, highlighting its market microstructure precision. Metallic components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and block trade processing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-1.jpg)

## Specified Transaction

Meaning ▴ A Specified Transaction refers to a distinct, precisely defined financial exchange or operational activity with clear terms and conditions, often formalized within legal agreements or regulatory frameworks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

## 2002 Isda

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA, or the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement, represents the prevailing global standard contractual framework developed by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association for documenting over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions between two parties. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous teal sphere, representing a digital asset derivative private quotation, rests on an RFQ protocol channel. A metallic element signifies the algorithmic trading engine and robust portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-optimizing-prime-os.jpg)

## Force Majeure

Meaning ▴ In the context of crypto investment and trading, a Force Majeure clause refers to a critical contractual provision that excuses parties from fulfilling their obligations when certain extraordinary events, beyond their reasonable control, prevent performance. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An advanced RFQ protocol engine core, showcasing robust Prime Brokerage infrastructure. Intricate polished components facilitate high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-for-precision-trading.jpg)

## Credit Support Annex

Meaning ▴ A Credit Support Annex (CSA) is a critical legal document, typically an addendum to an ISDA Master Agreement, that governs the bilateral exchange of collateral between counterparties in over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions. </a>

**Tags:** [Counterparty Risk Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk-management/), [Early Termination](https://options.greeks.live/area/early-termination/), [ISDA Schedule Negotiation](https://options.greeks.live/area/isda-schedule-negotiation/), [Market Data](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-data/), [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://options.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/), [Asian NDFs](https://options.greeks.live/area/asian-ndfs/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences in Collateral Rights between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Forms?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-in-collateral-rights-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-forms/)
![Two off-white elliptical components separated by a dark, central mechanism. This embodies an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery for block trades, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ for dark liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-4.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA enhances collateral rights via a flexible "Close-out Amount" and mandatory two-way payments for greater valuation certainty.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements/)
![Precisely engineered metallic components, including a central pivot, symbolize the market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. This mechanism embodies RFQ protocols facilitating high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and optimal price discovery for crypto options.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement enhances risk management through a flexible close-out process and faster default recognition.

- 
### [What Are the Practical Implications of the Close-Out Amount for a Derivatives Trading Desk?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-practical-implications-of-the-close-out-amount-for-a-derivatives-trading-desk/)
![Sharp, intersecting elements, two light, two teal, on a reflective disc, centered by a precise mechanism. This visualizes institutional liquidity convergence for multi-leg options strategies in digital asset derivatives. It embodies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocol within a Principal's operational framework, leveraging algorithmic trading engines for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-execution.jpg)

The close-out amount is a defensible, calculated value that crystallizes a portfolio's worth upon contract termination.

- 
### [How Does the Close-Out Amount in the 2002 ISDA Improve on Market Quotation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-in-the-2002-isda-improve-on-market-quotation-2/)
![Sleek, modular system component in beige and dark blue, featuring precise ports and a vibrant teal indicator. This embodies Prime RFQ architecture enabling high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives through bilateral RFQ protocols, ensuring low-latency interconnects, private quotation, institutional-grade liquidity, and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-system-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA's Close-Out Amount provides a flexible, evidence-based framework for calculating true economic loss, enhancing resilience.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Drivers for Adopting the 2002 Isda over the 1992 Version?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-drivers-for-adopting-the-2002-isda-over-the-1992-version/)
![A focused view of a robust, beige cylindrical component with a dark blue internal aperture, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution channel. This element represents the core of an RFQ protocol system, enabling bespoke liquidity for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, minimizing slippage and information leakage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-precision-component.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA provides a superior risk architecture through a more flexible and robust close-out valuation protocol.

- 
### [From a Risk Management Perspective, When Does the Cost of Full Migration to the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement Become Justifiable?](https://options.greeks.live/question/from-a-risk-management-perspective-when-does-the-cost-of-full-migration-to-the-2002-isda-master-agreement-become-justifiable/)
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

The cost of migrating to the 2002 ISDA is justified when the risk of uncertain default outcomes exceeds the cost of a legal framework upgrade.

- 
### [What Is the Difference between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Close out Standards?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-close-out-standards-2/)
![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics. It signifies the robust Prime RFQ underpinning RFQ protocols for atomic settlement and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement replaced the 1992 version's subjective close-out methods with a single, objective commercial reasonableness standard.

- 
### [How Does the Close out Amount Calculation Differ from Market Quotation and Loss?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-market-quotation-and-loss/)
![Abstract layers in grey, mint green, and deep blue visualize a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. The textured grey signifies market microstructure, while the mint green layer with precise slots represents RFQ protocol parameters, enabling high-fidelity execution, private quotation, capital efficiency, and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

The Close-Out Amount calculation is a flexible, principles-based valuation system superseding the rigid Market Quotation and subjective Loss methods.

- 
### [What Constitutes a Commercially Reasonable Procedure for Calculating a Close-Out Amount?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-constitutes-a-commercially-reasonable-procedure-for-calculating-a-close-out-amount/)
![Detailed metallic disc, a Prime RFQ core, displays etched market microstructure. Its central teal dome, an intelligence layer, facilitates price discovery. Protruding rods signify low-latency RFQ protocol data transmission, ensuring high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

A commercially reasonable procedure is an objective, evidence-based method for valuing terminated derivatives to restore economic equivalence.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Key Differences between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements for Asian Counterparties?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements-for-asian-counterparties/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements-for-asian-counterparties/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Key Differences between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements for Asian Counterparties? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The 2002 ISDA is a systemic upgrade, offering a more robust risk protocol through its unified Close-out Amount and faster default triggers. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements-for-asian-counterparties/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-01T19:42:14+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-24T00:18:46+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-precision-component.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract close-up showcases a critical precision component, likely part of an advanced institutional trading system. Its clean, cylindrical form with a deep, focused aperture embodies the dedicated RFQ engine at the heart of a Prime RFQ, facilitating efficient price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. The design signifies robust infrastructure for low-latency algorithmic execution, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies and ensuring best execution through private quotation mechanisms, crucial for managing portfolio margin and mitigating counterparty risk in volatile markets."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "1992 ISDA",
        "1992 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "2002 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Asian NDFs",
        "Close-Out Amount",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Counterparty Risk Management",
        "Credit Support Annex",
        "Cross Default",
        "Derivatives Law",
        "Early Termination",
        "Force Majeure",
        "Force Majeure Event",
        "Good Faith",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "ISDA Schedule Negotiation",
        "Market Data",
        "Market Quotation",
        "Risk Management",
        "Set-Off Provision",
        "Specified Transaction",
        "Swaps and Derivatives"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Do Default Protocols Differ?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The 2002 Agreement recalibrated the triggers and timelines for default, creating a system that responds more rapidly to signs of counterparty distress. These changes have direct strategic consequences for managing credit risk with Asian counterparties."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Are Key Drafting Considerations For The Schedule?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Regardless of the version chosen, the ISDA Schedule is where the agreement is tailored to the specific relationship. For Asian counterparties, several clauses require meticulous drafting."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements-for-asian-counterparties/
