# What Are the Key Differences between the Us and Eu Approaches to Regulating Market Abuse? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-05
**Categories:** Question

---

![Angular metallic structures precisely intersect translucent teal planes against a dark backdrop. This embodies an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform's market microstructure, signifying high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-system-architecture.jpg)

![A polished, dark, reflective surface, embodying market microstructure and latent liquidity, supports clear crystalline spheres. These symbolize price discovery and high-fidelity execution within an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, reflecting implied volatility and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Concept

An examination of [market abuse regulation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-abuse-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in the United States and the [European Union](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-has-mifid-ii-impacted-the-use-of-systematic-internalisers-in-the-european-union/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) reveals two distinct architectural philosophies for achieving the same foundational objective market integrity. The divergence is rooted in the very genesis of their respective legal frameworks. The US system evolved through judicial interpretation of broad anti-fraud statutes, specifically Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This has resulted in a common law-driven approach where the contours of offenses like [insider trading](https://prime.greeks.live/area/insider-trading/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are shaped by decades of court decisions. It is a system built on precedent, where the illegality of an action is often linked to a breach of a pre-existing duty of trust or confidence.

Conversely, the European Union employs a statute-based civil law architecture, crystallized in the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). This framework provides a detailed, codified rulebook that explicitly defines offenses such as insider dealing, unlawful disclosure of [inside information](https://prime.greeks.live/area/inside-information/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and [market manipulation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-manipulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The EU’s approach is prescriptive, aiming to establish a harmonized and unambiguous set of rules applicable across all member states. This structural difference has profound implications for market participants, as it dictates not just the letter of the law but the entire system of surveillance, enforcement, and compliance.

> The US regulatory framework for market abuse is founded on anti-fraud case law, while the EU’s is based on a detailed, harmonized civil statute.

The core distinction lies in the concept of obligation. In the US, liability for insider trading, under both the “classical” and “misappropriation” theories, hinges on the existence of a [fiduciary duty](https://prime.greeks.live/area/fiduciary-duty/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) or a similar relationship of trust and confidence that is subsequently breached. An individual is typically liable if they trade on [material non-public information](https://prime.greeks.live/area/material-non-public-information/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in violation of a duty owed to shareholders or the source of the information. The EU’s MAR dispenses with this requirement.

Liability is not predicated on a breach of duty but on the act itself. The simple possession of inside information and the subsequent use of that information for trading is sufficient to constitute an offense, regardless of how the information was obtained or what duties were owed.

This fundamental difference extends to the mental state, or intent, required to prove a violation. The US system requires prosecutors to demonstrate ‘[scienter](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scienter/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),’ a culpable state of mind indicating a wilful or reckless disregard for the rules. The EU’s civil regime, in contrast, does not have an equivalent intent requirement.

The focus is on the objective behavior, creating a regime that is, in many respects, broader in scope and application. These divergent starting points create two separate operational realities for any firm or fund whose activities span both jurisdictions, necessitating a dual [compliance architecture](https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) capable of navigating both a principles-based, duty-driven system and a rules-based, act-driven one.

![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

![Abstract depiction of an institutional digital asset derivatives execution system. A central market microstructure wheel supports a Prime RFQ framework, revealing an algorithmic trading engine for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads and block trades via advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Strategy

For a global financial institution, navigating the strategic differences between US and EU [market abuse](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-abuse/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) regulations requires a deep understanding of their divergent enforcement mechanisms and definitions of illicit activity. The strategic challenge is rooted in the philosophical split between the US fraud-based model and the EU’s market-integrity model. This dictates everything from pre-trade analysis to post-trade surveillance and reporting protocols.

![A transparent, precisely engineered optical array rests upon a reflective dark surface, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ. Beige conduits represent latency-optimized data pipelines facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-architecture.jpg)

## Defining the Prohibited Act

The operational definitions of market abuse offenses present the most significant strategic divergence. A trading action that is permissible in one jurisdiction may be a clear violation in the other. This requires a firm’s compliance framework to be calibrated to the stricter of the two standards, depending on the nexus of the trade.

In the EU, under [MAR](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mar/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the act of trading while in possession of inside information is the central element of the offense. The regulation also explicitly prohibits recommending or inducing another person to engage in [insider dealing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/insider-dealing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), even if no trade ultimately occurs. This creates a broad perimeter of liability. The US framework is more complex.

Liability is established by connecting the trade to a breach of a duty, a connection that often requires extensive legal analysis. The concept of receiving a “personal benefit” by the tipper, while its importance has been debated in US courts, adds another layer of strategic consideration that is absent in the EU’s more direct framework.

![Abstract layers in grey, mint green, and deep blue visualize a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. The textured grey signifies market microstructure, while the mint green layer with precise slots represents RFQ protocol parameters, enabling high-fidelity execution, private quotation, capital efficiency, and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## How Do the Definitions of Insider Trading Compare?

The table below provides a strategic comparison of the core elements of an insider trading offense in both jurisdictions. This comparison is vital for developing a global compliance program that can effectively manage the risks associated with handling material non-public information.

| Element | United States Approach (Fraud-Based) | European Union Approach (MAR) |
| --- | --- | --- |

![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

## Scope and Extraterritorial Reach

A critical strategic consideration is the scope of each regime. The EU’s MAR applies to any financial instrument admitted to trading on an EU regulated market, a multilateral trading facility (MTF), or an organized trading facility (OTF). This has significant extraterritorial implications.

A US-based issuer whose securities are traded on a European MTF, even without their explicit consent in some cases, can fall under the purview of MAR’s prohibitions. This means a US fund trading shares of a US company on a German MTF is subject to EU rules.

> The extraterritorial reach of both the US and EU regulations necessitates a globally consistent, yet locally-aware, compliance strategy.

The US regime also has [extraterritorial reach](https://prime.greeks.live/area/extraterritorial-reach/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), often applied to transactions that have a substantial connection to the US, even if they occur abroad. For global institutions, this dual-threat landscape means that a single trading decision can be subject to scrutiny from both the SEC and a European [National Competent Authority](https://prime.greeks.live/area/national-competent-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (NCA). The compliance strategy must therefore be holistic, ensuring that internal policies on information barriers, insider lists, and trading restrictions are robust enough to satisfy the requirements of both systems simultaneously.

![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Market Manipulation Frameworks

The strategic approach to preventing market manipulation also differs. While both jurisdictions prohibit actions that create a false or misleading impression of supply, demand, or price, the EU’s MAR provides a more structured framework. It includes specific, non-exhaustive examples of manipulative behaviors, such as placing orders with no intention of executing them (a practice known as “spoofing”) or securing a dominant position to exploit or distort prices.

The US regime, drawing from various sections of the Commodity Exchange Act and securities laws, addresses the same behaviors but through a less codified, more enforcement-driven lens. This requires firms to develop surveillance systems that can detect patterns indicative of manipulation under both the specific EU definitions and the broader principles of the US anti-fraud statutes.

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![A central rod, symbolizing an RFQ inquiry, links distinct liquidity pools and market makers. A transparent disc, an execution venue, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a compliant trading operation across US and EU markets requires the translation of regulatory principles into a concrete, technology-driven control framework. This is where the architectural differences between the two regimes become most tangible, impacting everything from data management and employee training to the specific algorithms used in surveillance systems.

![A sleek, metallic algorithmic trading component with a central circular mechanism rests on angular, multi-colored reflective surfaces, symbolizing sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated liquidity, and high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This represents the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ for optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-system-architecture-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Operationalizing Compliance and Surveillance

A firm’s compliance infrastructure must be designed to operate bilingually, speaking the language of both US and EU regulations. This is most evident in the handling of inside information and the reporting of suspicious activity.

- **Insider Lists** ▴ Under the EU’s MAR, issuers are required to create and maintain highly detailed insider lists in a specific digital format. These lists must document every individual who has access to inside information, the reason for their access, and the precise date and time of access. While US regulations also require robust controls over material non-public information, the EU’s requirements are far more prescriptive and administrative. A global firm must implement a system capable of generating MAR-compliant lists for any security with a European trading nexus, a task that demands rigorous internal data governance. 

- **Suspicious Transaction and Order Reports ([STORs](https://prime.greeks.live/area/stors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite))** ▴ MAR mandates that firms promptly report any suspicious transaction or order to their national regulator. This is a proactive obligation. The US system also requires the reporting of suspicious activity, but the EU’s STOR regime is more formalized and places a heavy burden on firms to have systems in place that can effectively detect and flag a wide range of potentially abusive behaviors. 

![A sleek, layered structure with a metallic rod and reflective sphere symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. It represents high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## What Are the Practical Differences in Reporting Obligations?

The operational burden of reporting differs significantly. An effective execution strategy involves building a surveillance and reporting engine that can ingest market and order data and apply different rule sets based on the jurisdiction. For example, the system must be able to identify a pattern of order placement and cancellation that might trigger a STOR in the EU, while also flagging trading that might indicate a breach of fiduciary duty under US law.

![Abstract geometric planes in grey, gold, and teal symbolize a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives, representing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocol. It drives real-time price discovery within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency for multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## A Comparative Analysis of Enforcement Actions

The ultimate test of a compliance framework is its ability to withstand regulatory scrutiny. The enforcement philosophies of the US and EU lead to different types of investigations and penalties, which must be factored into any firm’s risk management calculus.

| Enforcement Aspect | United States Execution | European Union Execution |
| --- | --- | --- |

![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## Technological and Architectural Imperatives

From a systems architecture perspective, a dual-regime compliance model is a necessity. This is not simply a matter of having two separate rulebooks on a shelf; it requires a deeply integrated technological solution.

- **Unified Data Lake** ▴ All trading and communications data (orders, executions, emails, chat logs) must be captured in a central repository. This allows for holistic analysis, where a single event can be examined through both the US and EU regulatory lenses. 

- **Rule Engine Flexibility** ▴ The surveillance system’s rule engine must be highly configurable. It should be able to run scenarios based on MAR’s specific definitions of manipulation for all EU-listed instruments, while simultaneously applying more principle-based, pattern-recognition algorithms to detect potential duty breaches relevant to US law. 

- **Automated Reporting Workflows** ▴ When a suspicious event is detected, the system should automatically route it through the appropriate workflow. If it’s a potential MAR breach, the system should begin compiling the necessary data for a STOR filing. If it’s a potential US violation, it should be flagged for internal legal review, documenting the analysis of a potential duty breach. 

Ultimately, the execution of market abuse compliance in this dual-jurisdictional environment is a problem of data, logic, and workflow. Success depends on building a single, coherent system that understands the distinct logic of two powerful, and often overlapping, regulatory architectures.

![An abstract metallic cross-shaped mechanism, symbolizing a Principal's execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its teal arm highlights specialized RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for optimal capital efficiency and atomic settlement via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

## References

- Sack, Jonathan S. and Christian B. Ronald. “Duty Bound ▴ A Comparison of Insider Trading Law in the United States and the European Union.” _The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation_, 2025.

- Clifford Chance. “The US and EU ▴ An ocean apart on insider dealing regulation?” _Clifford Chance Briefing_, June 2015.

- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. “Insider Trading in the EU and US Markets ▴ An Ocean Apart?” _Quinn Emanuel Publication_, 2017.

- Latham & Watkins. “The New EU Market Abuse Regulation ▴ Impact on US Issuers.” _Latham & Watkins Client Alert_, November 2016.

- Entrima. “Market Abuse Regulations ▴ US Versus EU.” _Entrima Blog_, August 2022.

![Two reflective, disc-like structures, one tilted, one flat, symbolize the Market Microstructure of Digital Asset Derivatives. This metaphor encapsulates RFQ Protocols and High-Fidelity Execution within a Liquidity Pool for Price Discovery, vital for a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-optimizing-market-microstructure-principal-trading-best-execution-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Reflection

The examination of the US and EU market abuse regimes reveals more than a simple list of legal differences. It exposes two distinct philosophies on how to build trust in a market system. One relies on the deterrent power of punishing fraudulent breaches of duty, a system built from the ground up through judicial precedent. The other constructs a detailed, top-down architecture of explicit rules, aiming for universal clarity.

For the global institution, the challenge is to internalize both philosophies. Your operational framework must be more than a collection of compliance checks; it must be a coherent system of controls that respects the logic of both worlds. How does your current surveillance and compliance architecture measure up not just to the letter of these rules, but to the foundational principles they represent?

![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-abuse-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, precision-engineered module with raised circular elements integrates with a smooth beige housing. It signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols, ensuring robust price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-system-core-high-speed-price-discovery-module.jpg)

## Market Abuse Regulation

Meaning ▴ The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) is a European Union legislative framework designed to establish a common regulatory approach to prevent market abuse across financial markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-has-mifid-ii-impacted-the-use-of-systematic-internalisers-in-the-european-union/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

## European Union

MiFID II architected the SI regime to channel bilateral trading into a transparent, data-rich, and systematically regulated framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/insider-trading/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, futuristic object with a glowing line and intricate metallic core, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine enabling high-fidelity execution, liquidity aggregation, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Insider Trading

Meaning ▴ Insider trading defines the illicit practice of leveraging material, non-public information to execute securities or digital asset transactions for personal or institutional financial gain. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-manipulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, multi-component digital infrastructure with a central lens and circuit patterns, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives platform. This Prime RFQ enables High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol, optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading, Price Discovery, and Multi-Leg Spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-powering-high-fidelity-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocol-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Market Manipulation

Meaning ▴ Market manipulation denotes any intentional conduct designed to artificially influence the supply, demand, price, or volume of a financial instrument, thereby distorting true market discovery mechanisms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/inside-information/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, bimodal digital asset derivatives execution interface, partially open, revealing a dark, secure internal structure. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution and strategic price discovery via institutional RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Inside Information

Meaning ▴ Inside information constitutes material, non-public data concerning an entity or market, which, if made publicly available, would demonstrably influence the valuation or trading activity of associated financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/material-non-public-information/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Material Non-Public Information

Meaning ▴ Material Non-Public Information refers to data that is not broadly disseminated and, if publicly known, would predictably influence the market price of a security or derivative instrument. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/fiduciary-duty/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent sphere with intricate metallic rings, an 'intelligence layer' core, is bisected by a sleek, reflective blade. This visual embodies an 'institutional grade' 'Prime RFQ' enabling 'high-fidelity execution' of 'digital asset derivatives' via 'private quotation' and 'RFQ protocols', optimizing 'capital efficiency' and 'market microstructure' for 'block trade' operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Fiduciary Duty

Meaning ▴ Fiduciary duty constitutes a legal and ethical obligation requiring one party, the fiduciary, to act solely in the best interests of another party, the beneficiary. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scienter/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized spherical system, symbolizing an institutional digital asset derivative, rests on a robust Prime RFQ base. Its dark core represents a deep liquidity pool for algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-best-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Scienter

Meaning ▴ Scienter signifies comprehensive knowledge of a system's operational parameters and predictable outcomes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise optical sensor within an institutional-grade execution management system, representing a Prime RFQ intelligence layer. This enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-lens.jpg)

## Compliance Architecture

Meaning ▴ Compliance Architecture constitutes a structured framework of technological systems, processes, and controls designed to ensure rigorous adherence to regulatory mandates, internal risk policies, and best execution principles within institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-abuse/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives system, featuring multi-aperture optical sensors and data conduits. This high-fidelity RFQ engine optimizes multi-leg spread execution, enabling latency-sensitive price discovery and robust principal risk management via atomic settlement and dynamic portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-alpha-generation-system.jpg)

## Market Abuse

Meaning ▴ Market abuse denotes a spectrum of behaviors that distort the fair and orderly operation of financial markets, compromising the integrity of price formation and the equitable access to information for all participants. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/insider-dealing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, metallic components with reflective blue surfaces depict an advanced institutional RFQ protocol. Its central pivot and radiating arms symbolize aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution, optimizing order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Insider Dealing

Meaning ▴ Insider Dealing refers to the illicit act of executing trades in financial instruments, including institutional digital asset derivatives, while in possession of material, non-public information that, if publicly known, would significantly impact the asset's price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mar/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional grade system component, featuring a reflective intelligence layer lens, symbolizes high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight. This enables price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## Mar

Meaning ▴ MAR, or Maximum Allowable Risk, defines the absolute upper threshold of permissible exposure or potential loss for a given trading strategy, portfolio, or individual position within the institutional digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/national-competent-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A slender metallic probe extends between two curved surfaces. This abstractly illustrates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, driving price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## National Competent Authority

Meaning ▴ A National Competent Authority, or NCA, designates a public entity vested with statutory powers to regulate and supervise specific financial sectors or activities within its national jurisdiction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/extraterritorial-reach/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise, multi-layered disk embodies a dynamic Volatility Surface or deep Liquidity Pool for Digital Asset Derivatives. Dual metallic probes symbolize Algorithmic Trading and RFQ protocol inquiries, driving Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution of Multi-Leg Spreads within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-mechanism-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## Extraterritorial Reach

Meaning ▴ Extraterritorial reach refers to the assertion of legal or regulatory authority by a sovereign entity beyond its defined geographical borders, impacting the operational parameters and compliance obligations of financial entities engaged in cross-border digital asset derivative transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/stors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric planes, translucent teal representing dynamic liquidity pools and implied volatility surfaces, intersect a dark bar. This signifies FIX protocol driven algorithmic trading and smart order routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Stors

Meaning ▴ STORs, or Smart Order Routers, denote an advanced algorithmic execution system engineered to optimally direct institutional orders across a diverse array of digital asset trading venues. </a>

**Tags:** [MAR](https://options.greeks.live/area/mar/), [Material Non-Public Information](https://options.greeks.live/area/material-non-public-information/), [Insider Dealing](https://options.greeks.live/area/insider-dealing/), [Market Abuse Regulation](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-abuse-regulation/), [Extraterritorial Reach](https://options.greeks.live/area/extraterritorial-reach/), [Market Manipulation](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-manipulation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Legal and Regulatory Implications of Information Leakage in the Rfq Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-and-regulatory-implications-of-information-leakage-in-the-rfq-process/)
![A clear, faceted digital asset derivatives instrument, signifying a high-fidelity execution engine, precisely intersects a teal RFQ protocol bar. This illustrates multi-leg spread optimization and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ for institutional aggregated inquiry, ensuring best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-execution.jpg)

Information leakage in the RFQ process creates systemic risk; a robust, compliant architecture is essential for secure, efficient execution.

- 
### [How Do Conflicts of Interest like Payment for Order Flow Affect Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-conflicts-of-interest-like-payment-for-order-flow-affect-best-execution/)
![A smooth, off-white sphere rests within a meticulously engineered digital asset derivatives RFQ platform, featuring distinct teal and dark blue metallic components. This sophisticated market microstructure enables private quotation, high-fidelity execution, and optimized price discovery for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-microstructure-core.jpg)

Payment for order flow creates a systemic conflict that degrades best execution by incentivizing brokers to prioritize revenue over optimal client pricing.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Conflicts of Interest a Best Execution Committee Is Responsible for Managing?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-conflicts-of-interest-a-best-execution-committee-is-responsible-for-managing/)
![Prime RFQ visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocol and high-fidelity execution. Glowing liquidity streams converge at intelligent routing nodes, aggregating market microstructure for atomic settlement, mitigating counterparty risk within dark liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol.jpg)

A Best Execution Committee manages systemic conflicts between firm profitability and client duty through a data-driven oversight framework.

- 
### [What Regulatory Frameworks Address Information Leakage in Financial Markets?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-regulatory-frameworks-address-information-leakage-in-financial-markets/)
![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution. It highlights High-Fidelity Execution, Atomic Settlement, and Capital Efficiency within a Principal's Operational Framework for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

Regulatory frameworks address information leakage by mandating equitable information dissemination to ensure market integrity.

- 
### [How Do Regulators View the Use of Iceberg Orders and Other Obfuscation Techniques?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulators-view-the-use-of-iceberg-orders-and-other-obfuscation-techniques/)
![A central, precision-engineered component with teal accents rises from a reflective surface. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ engine, driving optimal price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. Surrounding granular texture depicts intricate market microstructure and latent liquidity within the Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-for-price-discovery.jpg)

Regulators view order obfuscation as a dual-use tool, permissible for mitigating market impact but illegal when used to deceive or manipulate.

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Implications of Information Leakage in the Context of Institutional Block Trading?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-implications-of-information-leakage-in-the-context-of-institutional-block-trading/)
![Three parallel diagonal bars, two light beige, one dark blue, intersect a central sphere on a dark base. This visualizes an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, facilitating high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads by aggregating latent liquidity and optimizing price discovery within a Prime RFQ for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-best-execution-multi-leg-spreads-latent-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

The regulatory implications of information leakage in block trading center on preventing fraud and market manipulation through strict enforcement of confidentiality duties.

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Implications of Information Leakage between Bond and Equity Markets?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-implications-of-information-leakage-between-bond-and-equity-markets/)
![Robust polygonal structures depict foundational institutional liquidity pools and market microstructure. Transparent, intersecting planes symbolize high-fidelity execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies and atomic settlement, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols within a controlled dark pool environment, ensuring optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

Regulatory frameworks aim to neutralize advantages from privileged cross-market information, ensuring market integrity.

- 
### [How Does the Proposed Sec Regulation Best Execution Differ from Finra Rule 5310?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-proposed-sec-regulation-best-execution-differ-from-finra-rule-5310/)
![Sharp, intersecting geometric planes in teal, deep blue, and beige form a precise, pointed leading edge against darkness. This signifies High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, reflecting complex Market Microstructure and Price Discovery. It embodies RFQ optimization, Capital Efficiency across Liquidity Pools, and Atomic Settlement via a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-2.jpg)

SEC Regulation Best Execution mandates a prescriptive, data-driven compliance architecture, expanding beyond FINRA's principles-based standard.

- 
### [What Are the Core Technological Investments Required for Quote-Driven Market Compliance?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-core-technological-investments-required-for-quote-driven-market-compliance/)
![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

Architecting compliant, high-performance systems for quote-driven digital asset markets secures operational integrity and a decisive strategic edge.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Key Differences between the Us and Eu Approaches to Regulating Market Abuse?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-us-and-eu-approaches-to-regulating-market-abuse/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-us-and-eu-approaches-to-regulating-market-abuse/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Key Differences between the Us and Eu Approaches to Regulating Market Abuse? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The US regulates market abuse via a fraud-based, common law model, while the EU uses a broader, statute-driven administrative system. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-us-and-eu-approaches-to-regulating-market-abuse/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-05T12:48:58+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-05T12:48:58+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "A metallic, pointed instrument extends horizontally between a brightly lit beige arc and a textured teal arc against a black background. This visual metaphor depicts system specialists' precision in algorithmic trading for institutional digital asset derivatives. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery across fragmented liquidity pools. The probe symbolizes smart order routing navigating multi-leg spreads and dark pools, ensuring best execution and alpha generation for capital efficiency via the Prime RFQ intelligence layer."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Compliance Architecture",
        "Extraterritorial Reach",
        "Fiduciary Duty",
        "Inside Information",
        "Insider Dealing",
        "Insider Trading",
        "MAR",
        "Market Abuse",
        "Market Abuse Regulation",
        "Market Manipulation",
        "Material Non-Public Information",
        "National Competent Authority",
        "Scienter",
        "Section 10(B)",
        "Securities and Exchange Commission",
        "STORs"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Do The Definitions Of Insider Trading Compare?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The table below provides a strategic comparison of the core elements of an insider trading offense in both jurisdictions. This comparison is vital for developing a global compliance program that can effectively manage the risks associated with handling material non-public information."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Are The Practical Differences In Reporting Obligations?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The operational burden of reporting differs significantly. An effective execution strategy involves building a surveillance and reporting engine that can ingest market and order data and apply different rule sets based on the jurisdiction. For example, the system must be able to identify a pattern of order placement and cancellation that might trigger a STOR in the EU, while also flagging trading that might indicate a breach of fiduciary duty under US law."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-us-and-eu-approaches-to-regulating-market-abuse/
