# What Are the Key Differences between US and EU Best Execution Requirements for RFQs? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-06
**Categories:** Question

---

![Two precision-engineered nodes, possibly representing a Private Quotation or RFQ mechanism, connect via a transparent conduit against a striped Market Microstructure backdrop. This visualizes High-Fidelity Execution pathways for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within a Dark Pool environment, optimizing Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-nodes.jpg)

![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

## Concept

The operational architecture of [best execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for [Request for Quote](https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-quote/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RFQ) protocols reveals a fundamental divergence in regulatory philosophy between the United States and the European Union. An analysis of these frameworks moves beyond a simple checklist of rules. It uncovers two distinct approaches to achieving the same objective ▴ safeguarding client interests. The US system, constructed upon a principle of ‘reasonable diligence,’ trusts the firm’s internal processes of review and justification.

The EU’s MiFID II framework, conversely, operates on a mandate of ‘[all sufficient steps](https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),’ codifying a more demanding, evidence-based system of continuous verification. For an institutional [trading desk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/trading-desk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) operating across both jurisdictions, understanding this core difference is the foundational layer for designing a compliant and globally efficient execution system.

The US framework, primarily governed by [FINRA Rule 5310](https://prime.greeks.live/area/finra-rule-5310/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), establishes a duty to seek the most favorable price possible under prevailing market conditions. Its architecture emphasizes a periodic, retrospective analysis. A firm must conduct ‘regular and rigorous’ reviews of its [execution quality](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), comparing its chosen venues against alternatives. This model provides a degree of flexibility, allowing firms to design their own review methodologies, provided they can defend them.

The system is built on the premise that a well-structured internal [review process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-best-execution-review-process-differ-for-fully-automated-versus-high-touch-orders/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), conducted with diligence, will naturally lead to optimal client outcomes. The burden of proof lies in the quality and consistency of this backward-looking analysis.

> The core distinction lies in the EU’s prescriptive, evidence-gathering mandate versus the US’s focus on justifiable, periodic review processes.

The European Union’s approach, embedded within the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II ([MiFID II](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)), is architecturally different. It imposes a proactive and granular obligation. The phrase ‘all [sufficient steps](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’ elevates the standard of care. It requires firms not only to seek the best outcome but to construct and maintain a demonstrable system that is designed to achieve it on an ongoing basis.

This is particularly salient for RFQ markets. Under MiFID II, best execution unequivocally applies to RFQs where a client places ‘[legitimate reliance](https://prime.greeks.live/area/legitimate-reliance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’ on the firm. This reliance is assessed through a clear, four-part test, removing ambiguity and compelling firms to apply the full weight of the best execution process to a significant portion of their bilateral trading flow. The EU system is less about periodic justification and more about the continuous generation of evidence to prove the efficacy of the [execution policy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) itself.

This structural variance has profound implications for the design of trading systems, data infrastructure, and compliance workflows. A system designed for the US market prioritizes robust data logging for quarterly reviews and the ability to produce reports justifying routing decisions. A system built for EU compliance must be engineered from the ground up to capture a far wider array of data points in real-time, not just for internal review, but for mandatory public reporting under Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) 27 and 28.

The EU framework effectively externalizes the proof of best execution, demanding a level of transparency and data disclosure that is orders of magnitude greater than its US counterpart. This transforms best execution from a compliance function into a core component of the [data architecture](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

![Abstract spheres and a translucent flow visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. It depicts robust RFQ protocol execution, high-fidelity data flow, and seamless liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement-across-prime-os.jpg)

![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a global execution strategy for RFQs requires a bifurcated approach that addresses the distinct strategic pressures of the US and EU regimes. The operational plan must accommodate both the US model’s emphasis on periodic validation and the EU’s demand for continuous, data-intensive proof. For a trading desk, this means designing a single, coherent operational framework that can satisfy two different sets of evidentiary requirements without creating redundant or conflicting processes. The strategy hinges on building a data and analytics layer that is comprehensive enough for MiFID II’s granular reporting, which can then be selectively aggregated and analyzed to meet FINRA’s review obligations.

![Close-up reveals robust metallic components of an institutional-grade execution management system. Precision-engineered surfaces and central pivot signify high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-precision-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-best-execution-and-prime-os.jpg)

## How Do Execution Factors Shape Venue Selection?

The choice of execution venues and counterparties in an [RFQ](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) workflow is directly influenced by the weighting of [execution factors](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) under each regime. While both frameworks acknowledge a similar set of factors, their application and the burden of proof differ significantly, impacting strategic decisions.

In the EU, MiFID II requires firms to establish a clear policy detailing the relative importance of execution factors for different instrument classes and client types. These factors include price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution, size, and nature of the order. For illiquid or complex RFQs, factors like likelihood of execution and counterparty reliability may strategically outweigh raw price.

The critical element is that the firm must pre-define this logic in its execution policy and be able to demonstrate, through data, that it has followed this policy consistently. This leads to a more formalized and evidence-based approach to counterparty selection, where qualitative assessments must be backed by quantitative data.

In the US, FINRA [Rule 5310](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rule-5310/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) also lists several factors for consideration. However, the strategic application is often assessed through the lens of the ‘regular and rigorous’ review. A firm might route RFQs to a specific set of counterparties based on historical performance.

The strategic challenge is to ensure that the quarterly review process adequately captures the performance of these counterparties across the relevant execution factors and compares them to other potential liquidity sources. The focus is less on a pre-defined, client-consented policy and more on the robustness of the post-trade review process to justify the routing decisions made.

> A successful global strategy treats the EU’s stringent data requirements as the baseline, allowing US compliance to become a subset of a broader, more robust data architecture.

The following table provides a strategic comparison of the two regimes, highlighting how their foundational differences translate into distinct operational priorities for an RFQ-based trading desk.

### Table 1 ▴ Strategic Comparison of US and EU Best Execution Regimes for RFQs

| Strategic Dimension | EU (MiFID II) | US (FINRA Rule 5310) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Core Principle | “All sufficient steps” ▴ A proactive, continuous obligation to build and prove an effective system. | “Reasonable diligence” ▴ A duty to ascertain the best market, validated by periodic reviews. |
| Application to RFQs | Explicitly applied where the client has ‘legitimate reliance,’ determined by a four-fold test. | Applies broadly to all customer transactions, with the definition of “market” including various liquidity sources. |
| Evidentiary Burden | High. Requires extensive data collection for public reporting (RTS 27/28) and client demonstration. | Moderate. Focuses on documenting the ‘regular and rigorous’ review process to justify routing decisions. |
| Policy Requirement | Mandatory, detailed Order Execution Policy requiring client consent. | Written Supervisory Procedures (WSPs) must address best execution, but without the client consent mandate. |
| Strategic Focus | Building a data-rich, transparent, and auditable execution framework. | Developing a robust and defensible post-trade review and justification process. |

![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## Transaction Cost Analysis as a Strategic Tool

[Transaction Cost Analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([TCA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/tca/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)) evolves from a simple measurement tool into a core strategic component under these regimes. Its function must be adapted to meet the different demands of EU and US regulators.

- **TCA in the EU** ▴ Under MiFID II, TCA is not just a post-trade exercise. It is an integral part of the ‘sufficient steps’ obligation. The data generated by TCA must be granular enough to populate [RTS 28](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) reports and to provide clients with a meaningful analysis of execution quality. For RFQs, this means TCA systems must capture not just the execution price against a benchmark, but also metrics like response times, response rates, and price improvement relative to the initial quote. The strategy is to use TCA as a forward-looking tool to refine the execution policy and counterparty list, with the data serving as evidence of this continuous improvement cycle. 

- **TCA in the US** ▴ For FINRA compliance, TCA is the primary tool for conducting the ‘regular and rigorous’ review. The strategic focus is on using TCA to compare the execution quality of the firm’s chosen routing arrangements against other potential venues. The analysis must be sufficiently detailed to identify any material differences in execution quality and to trigger a change in routing strategy or a documented justification for maintaining the status quo. The TCA process is the engine of the periodic review cycle. 

![A sophisticated system's core component, representing an Execution Management System, drives a precise, luminous RFQ protocol beam. This beam navigates between balanced spheres symbolizing counterparties and intricate market microstructure, facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, optimizing price discovery, and ensuring high-fidelity execution within a prime brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-10.jpg)

![A polished, abstract geometric form represents a dynamic RFQ Protocol for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives. A central liquidity pool is surrounded by opening market segments, revealing an emerging arm displaying high-fidelity execution data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a compliant RFQ workflow in a dual US/EU regulatory environment is an exercise in data architecture and process engineering. The core challenge is to build a unified system that captures the superset of all required data points and can then generate the specific reports and analyses required by each jurisdiction. The operational playbook must be built on a foundation of granular data capture at every stage of the RFQ lifecycle.

![A sleek, futuristic apparatus featuring a central spherical processing unit flanked by dual reflective surfaces and illuminated data conduits. This system visually represents an advanced RFQ protocol engine facilitating high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-options-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-interface.jpg)

## What Does a Compliant RFQ Data Model Entail?

At the heart of the execution framework is the data model. To satisfy both MiFID II’s [RTS 27](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)/28 reporting and FINRA’s review requirements, the system must capture a wide range of data fields. The EU’s requirements are more prescriptive and serve as the logical starting point for designing the data architecture. A system built to satisfy RTS 28 for RFQs will, by default, capture most of the data needed for a robust FINRA review.

The following table outlines a selection of critical data fields that must be captured in the operational workflow. This is not an exhaustive list but represents the core of a compliant data model for RFQ execution.

### Table 2 ▴ Core Data Fields for a Dual-Jurisdiction RFQ Execution System

| Data Category | Specific Data Point | Primary Regulatory Driver | Operational Purpose |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RFQ Lifecycle Timing | Timestamp of RFQ creation | MiFID II (RTS 28) / FINRA | Establishes the start of the order lifecycle for latency calculations. |
| Price and Cost | Quoted prices from all solicited counterparties | MiFID II / FINRA | Demonstrates that a competitive process was run; allows for price improvement calculation. |
| Counterparty Analysis | Identity of all counterparties solicited | MiFID II / FINRA | Provides an audit trail of the liquidity discovery process. |

![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

## Operational Playbook for a Compliant RFQ Workflow

Building a compliant workflow requires a step-by-step process that integrates these data capture requirements into the daily operations of the trading desk. The following playbook outlines the key stages of this process.

- **Order Inception and Classification** ▴ 

<li>**Step 1.1** ▴ Upon receiving a client request, the system must immediately log the request and classify it. For EU clients, this includes applying the ‘legitimate reliance’ test to determine if the full best execution obligation applies. 

- **Step 1.2** ▴ The order details, including instrument, size, and any specific client instructions, are captured. Any specific instructions must be clearly flagged, as they can alter the best execution obligation.

</li>
- **Counterparty Selection and RFQ Dissemination** ▴ 

<li>**Step 2.1** ▴ Based on the instrument’s characteristics and the firm’s execution policy, a list of potential counterparties is generated. This selection process must be systematic and justifiable, drawing from a pool of approved liquidity providers.

- **Step 2.2** ▴ The RFQ is sent to the selected counterparties. The system must log which counterparties were solicited and the precise time the RFQ was sent.

</li>
- **Quote Aggregation and Analysis** ▴ 

<li>**Step 3.1** ▴ As quotes are received, they are time-stamped and logged against the corresponding counterparty. The system should present all quotes to the trader in a clear and comparable format.

- **Step 3.2** ▴ The system should enrich the quote data with relevant analytics, such as comparing the quoted prices to a prevailing market benchmark (e.g. composite mid-price) to calculate potential price improvement.

</li>
- **Execution and Confirmation** ▴ 

<li>**Step 4.1** ▴ The trader executes the order with the chosen counterparty. The decision, including the rationale if the best-priced quote was not selected, must be recorded. For example, a trader might choose a slightly worse price for a much larger size to minimize market impact.

- **Step 4.2** ▴ The execution time and final price are logged. A confirmation is sent to the client.

</li>
- **Post-Trade Analysis and Reporting** ▴ 

<li>**Step 5.1 (EU)** ▴ The captured data is fed into the systems responsible for generating the annual RTS 28 reports. This includes calculating metrics like mean quote response times and summarizing the top five execution venues (counterparties) used. 

- **Step 5.2 (US)** ▴ The data is aggregated for the quarterly ‘regular and rigorous’ review. TCA reports are generated to compare the execution quality achieved with the firm’s chosen counterparties against other available liquidity sources. The findings of this review are documented, and any necessary changes to the routing logic are implemented. 

</li>

![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## References

- Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. (2023). _Rule 5310 ▴ Best Execution and Interpositioning_. FINRA.

- European Securities and Markets Authority. (2017). _Questions and Answers on MiFID II and MiFIR investor protection and intermediaries topics_ (ESMA35-43-349).

- ICMA. (2017). _MiFID II/R Fixed Income Best Execution Requirements_. International Capital Market Association.

- Hogan Lovells. (2017). _Achieving best execution under MiFID II_.

- European Commission. (2017). _Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565_. Official Journal of the European Union.

![A sophisticated institutional-grade system's internal mechanics. A central metallic wheel, symbolizing an algorithmic trading engine, sits above glossy surfaces with luminous data pathways and execution triggers](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core.jpg)

## Reflection

![Abstract visualization of institutional digital asset RFQ protocols. Intersecting elements symbolize high-fidelity execution slicing dark liquidity pools, facilitating precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Is Your Execution Framework an Asset or a Liability?

The examination of US and EU best execution requirements for RFQs moves the conversation beyond mere compliance. It forces a critical evaluation of a firm’s core operational architecture. The regulations, with their distinct philosophical underpinnings, provide a non-negotiable set of design parameters.

A framework that merely satisfies these rules on a piecemeal basis represents a missed opportunity. It becomes a cost center, a complex web of processes designed to avoid penalties.

A superior approach views these regulatory mandates as the blueprint for building a strategic asset. A system architected to meet the granular, evidence-based demands of MiFID II inherently possesses the data and analytical power to far exceed the requirements of the US regime. Such a system transforms the burden of proof into a source of competitive intelligence.

It allows a firm not only to demonstrate compliance but to actively measure, manage, and optimize every facet of its execution quality. The ultimate question for any institutional desk is whether its response to these rules is reactive and fragmented, or if it is building a unified, data-centric framework that turns regulatory obligation into a demonstrable execution advantage.

![An institutional grade system component, featuring a reflective intelligence layer lens, symbolizes high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight. This enables price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-quote/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, dark sphere, symbolizing the Intelligence Layer of a Prime RFQ, rests on a sophisticated institutional grade platform. Its surface displays volatility surface data, hinting at quantitative analysis for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-intelligence-layer-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Request for Quote

Meaning ▴ A Request for Quote, or RFQ, constitutes a formal communication initiated by a potential buyer or seller to solicit price quotations for a specified financial instrument or block of instruments from one or more liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust metallic framework supports a teal half-sphere, symbolizing an institutional grade digital asset derivative or block trade processed within a Prime RFQ environment. This abstract view highlights the intricate market microstructure and high-fidelity execution of an RFQ protocol, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage through precise system interaction](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent cylinder containing a white sphere floats between two curved structures, each featuring a glowing teal line. This depicts institutional-grade RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and liquidity aggregation through a Prime RFQ for optimal block trade atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

## All Sufficient Steps

Meaning ▴ All Sufficient Steps denotes a design principle and operational mandate within a system where every component or process is engineered to autonomously achieve its defined objective without requiring external intervention or additional inputs beyond its initial parameters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/trading-desk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered blue mechanism, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution engine, emerges from a rounded, light-colored liquidity pool component, encased within a sleek teal institutional-grade shell. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, demonstrating algorithmic trading logic and smart order routing for block trades via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-core-algorithmic-execution-engine.jpg)

## Trading Desk

Meaning ▴ A Trading Desk represents a specialized operational system within an institutional financial entity, designed for the systematic execution, risk management, and strategic positioning of proprietary capital or client orders across various asset classes, with a particular focus on the complex and nascent digital asset derivatives landscape. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A chrome cross-shaped central processing unit rests on a textured surface, symbolizing a Principal's institutional grade execution engine. It integrates multi-leg options strategies and RFQ protocols, leveraging real-time order book dynamics for optimal price discovery in digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage and maximizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-hub.jpg)

## Execution Quality

Meaning ▴ Execution Quality quantifies the efficacy of an order's fill, assessing how closely the achieved trade price aligns with the prevailing market price at submission, alongside consideration for speed, cost, and market impact. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/finra-rule-5310/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise central mechanism, representing an institutional RFQ engine, is bisected by a luminous teal liquidity pipeline. This visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling precise price discovery and atomic settlement within an optimized market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Finra Rule 5310

Meaning ▴ FINRA Rule 5310 mandates broker-dealers diligently seek the best market for customer orders. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-best-execution-review-process-differ-for-fully-automated-versus-high-touch-orders/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic pointers converge on a central blue mechanism. This symbolizes Market Microstructure of Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, depicting High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ protocols, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Atomic Settlement for Multi-Leg Spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-precision-execution.jpg)

## Review Process

Best execution review differs by auditing system efficiency for automated orders versus assessing human judgment for high-touch trades. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A diagonal composition contrasts a blue intelligence layer, symbolizing market microstructure and volatility surface, with a metallic, precision-engineered execution engine. This depicts high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Sufficient Steps

Meaning ▴ Sufficient Steps constitute the minimum, verifiable sequence of operations required to achieve a defined, deterministic outcome within a financial protocol or system, ensuring operational closure and state transition. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Mifid Ii

Meaning ▴ MiFID II, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, constitutes a comprehensive regulatory framework enacted by the European Union to govern financial markets, investment firms, and trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/legitimate-reliance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision mechanism with a central circular core and a linear element extending to a sharp tip, encased in translucent material. This symbolizes an institutional RFQ protocol's market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Legitimate Reliance

Meaning ▴ Legitimate reliance in the context of institutional digital asset derivatives denotes the justifiable expectation that a system, protocol, or counterparty will perform consistently according to its designed specifications and explicit or implicit commitments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Beige module, dark data strip, teal reel, clear processing component. This illustrates an RFQ protocol's high-fidelity execution, facilitating principal-to-principal atomic settlement in market microstructure, essential for a Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Execution Policy

Meaning ▴ An Execution Policy defines a structured set of rules and computational logic governing the handling and execution of financial orders within a trading system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

## Data Architecture

Meaning ▴ Data Architecture defines the formal structure of an organization's data assets, establishing models, policies, rules, and standards that govern the collection, storage, arrangement, integration, and utilization of data. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A segmented, teal-hued system component with a dark blue inset, symbolizing an RFQ engine within a Prime RFQ, emerges from darkness. Illuminated by an optimized data flow, its textured surface represents market microstructure intricacies, facilitating high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via private quotation for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Execution Factors

Meaning ▴ Execution Factors are the quantifiable, dynamic variables that directly influence the outcome and quality of a trade execution within institutional digital asset markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, institutional-grade Prime RFQ component features intersecting transparent blades with a glowing core. This visualizes a precise RFQ execution engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and dynamic price discovery for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Rfq

Meaning ▴ Request for Quote (RFQ) is a structured communication protocol enabling a market participant to solicit executable price quotations for a specific instrument and quantity from a selected group of liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rule-5310/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent sphere, representing a granular digital asset derivative or RFQ quote, precisely balances on a proprietary execution rail. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution within complex market microstructure, driven by rapid price discovery from an institutional-grade trading engine, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-precision-1.jpg)

## Rule 5310

Meaning ▴ Rule 5310 mandates that registered persons provide written notice to their firm regarding any outside business activities, allowing the firm to assess and approve or disapprove such engagements. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, disc-shaped system, with concentric rings and a central dome, visually represents an advanced Principal's operational framework. It integrates RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and real-time risk management](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Transaction Cost Analysis

Meaning ▴ Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) is the quantitative methodology for assessing the explicit and implicit costs incurred during the execution of financial trades. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/tca/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Tca

Meaning ▴ Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) represents a quantitative methodology designed to evaluate the explicit and implicit costs incurred during the execution of financial trades. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central RFQ engine orchestrates diverse liquidity pools, represented by distinct blades, facilitating high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. Metallic rods signify robust FIX protocol connectivity, enabling efficient price discovery and atomic settlement for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-liquidity-orchestration.jpg)

## Rts 28

Meaning ▴ RTS 28 refers to Regulatory Technical Standard 28 under MiFID II, which mandates investment firms and market operators to publish annual reports on the quality of execution of transactions on trading venues and for financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Smooth, layered surfaces represent a Prime RFQ Protocol architecture for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. They symbolize integrated Liquidity Pool aggregation and optimized Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/market-microstructure-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Rts 27

Meaning ▴ RTS 27 mandates that investment firms and market operators publish detailed data on the quality of execution of transactions on their venues. </a>

**Tags:** [Liquidity Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/liquidity-sourcing/), [Execution Policy](https://options.greeks.live/area/execution-policy/), [Order Execution Policy](https://options.greeks.live/area/order-execution-policy/), [RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfq/), [Transaction Cost Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/), [RTS 28](https://options.greeks.live/area/rts-28/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between the Us and Eu Best Execution Regimes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-us-and-eu-best-execution-regimes/)
![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations. Translucent sections expose the quantitative analytics core enabling high-fidelity execution and low-latency order routing for Bitcoin options.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

The core difference is the US's prescriptive, data-driven focus on routing conflicts versus the EU's principles-based, holistic duty of care.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences in Best Execution Obligations between FINRA and MiFID II Frameworks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-in-best-execution-obligations-between-finra-and-mifid-ii-frameworks/)
![A multi-faceted algorithmic execution engine, reflective with teal components, navigates a cratered market microstructure. It embodies a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency, best execution via RFQ protocols in a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

FINRA requires documented "reasonable diligence," while MiFID II mandates a more prescriptive, data-driven proof of "all sufficient steps."

- 
### [What Are the Practical Steps to Ensure Best Execution in a Post-MiFID II RFQ Market?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-practical-steps-to-ensure-best-execution-in-a-post-mifid-ii-rfq-market/)
![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

Mastering post-MiFID II RFQ markets requires engineering a data-driven, auditable system for quantifiable best execution.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between Best Execution Obligations in the US and Europe?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-best-execution-obligations-in-the-us-and-europe/)
![A translucent sphere with intricate metallic rings, an 'intelligence layer' core, is bisected by a sleek, reflective blade. This visual embodies an 'institutional grade' 'Prime RFQ' enabling 'high-fidelity execution' of 'digital asset derivatives' via 'private quotation' and 'RFQ protocols', optimizing 'capital efficiency' and 'market microstructure' for 'block trade' operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

US best execution prioritizes principles-based diligence, while the EU's MiFID II mandates a prescriptive, data-driven demonstration of all sufficient steps.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Regulatory Frameworks Governing Best Execution in the US and Europe?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-regulatory-frameworks-governing-best-execution-in-the-us-and-europe/)
![A teal and white sphere precariously balanced on a light grey bar, itself resting on an angular base, depicts market microstructure at a critical price discovery point. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency and risk aggregation within a Principal trading desk's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-strategy.jpg)

The primary regulatory frameworks for best execution in the US and Europe mandate a demonstrable, data-driven process for achieving the most favorable client outcomes in fragmented markets.

- 
### [How Does the Treatment of Costs Differ between MiFID II and FINRA Best Execution Rules?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-treatment-of-costs-differ-between-mifid-ii-and-finra-best-execution-rules/)
![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

MiFID II mandates a quantitative "total consideration" cost analysis, while FINRA requires a principles-based "reasonable diligence" process.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Define Best Execution for Request for Quote Trades?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-define-best-execution-for-request-for-quote-trades/)
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sphere embodies a block trade or private quotation via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

MiFID II mandates that RFQ trades are governed by a systematic, evidence-based process ensuring the best possible result for clients.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Differ from FINRA Rules on Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-differ-from-finra-rules-on-best-execution/)
![An abstract composition of interlocking, precisely engineered metallic plates represents a sophisticated institutional trading infrastructure. Visible perforations within a central block symbolize optimized data conduits for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency. This visual metaphor highlights seamless interoperability, robust Prime RFQ architecture, and intelligent routing for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-layer.jpg)

MiFID II mandates a quantitative, data-driven proof of best execution, while FINRA requires a documented, principles-based process.

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Frameworks like MiFID II Specifically Address Best Execution for RFQ Protocols?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-specifically-address-best-execution-for-rfq-protocols/)
![A precision mechanism, symbolizing an algorithmic trading engine, centrally mounted on a market microstructure surface. Lens-like features represent liquidity pools and an intelligence layer for pre-trade analytics, enabling high-fidelity execution of institutional grade digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

MiFID II mandates that firms architect and evidence a systematic RFQ process that demonstrably secures the best possible client outcome.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Key Differences between US and EU Best Execution Requirements for RFQs?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-us-and-eu-best-execution-requirements-for-rfqs/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-us-and-eu-best-execution-requirements-for-rfqs/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Key Differences between US and EU Best Execution Requirements for RFQs? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "US and EU RFQ best execution diverges on the EU's mandate for continuous, data-intensive proof versus the US's focus on periodic, justifiable review. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-us-and-eu-best-execution-requirements-for-rfqs/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-06T12:33:59+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-06T12:34:03+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract image portrays a sophisticated, multi-layered system component, representing a precision-engineered device for institutional finance. It symbolizes a Prime RFQ platform, optimizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading via advanced RFQ protocols. The system ensures high-fidelity execution, leveraging liquidity aggregation and granular market microstructure analysis for superior price discovery. Integrated features facilitate continuous real-time risk management, counterparty risk assessment, and robust best execution across complex multi-leg spread strategies, enhancing capital efficiency."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "All Sufficient Steps",
        "Best Execution",
        "Cost Analysis",
        "Counterparty Analysis",
        "Data Architecture",
        "Execution Factors",
        "Execution Policy",
        "Execution Quality",
        "FINRA Rule 5310",
        "Legitimate Reliance",
        "Liquidity Sourcing",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "MiFID II",
        "Order Execution Policy",
        "Regular and Rigorous Review",
        "Regulatory Compliance",
        "Request for Quote",
        "RFQ",
        "RTS 27",
        "RTS 28",
        "Rule 5310",
        "Sufficient Steps",
        "TCA",
        "Trading Desk",
        "Transaction Cost",
        "Transaction Cost Analysis"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Do Execution Factors Shape Venue Selection?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The choice of execution venues and counterparties in an RFQ workflow is directly influenced by the weighting of execution factors under each regime. While both frameworks acknowledge a similar set of factors, their application and the burden of proof differ significantly, impacting strategic decisions."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Does A Compliant RFQ Data Model Entail?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "At the heart of the execution framework is the data model. To satisfy both MiFID II's RTS 27/28 reporting and FINRA's review requirements, the system must capture a wide range of data fields. The EU's requirements are more prescriptive and serve as the logical starting point for designing the data architecture. A system built to satisfy RTS 28 for RFQs will, by default, capture most of the data needed for a robust FINRA review."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "Is Your Execution Framework An Asset Or A Liability?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The examination of US and EU best execution requirements for RFQs moves the conversation beyond mere compliance. It forces a critical evaluation of a firm's core operational architecture. The regulations, with their distinct philosophical underpinnings, provide a non-negotiable set of design parameters. A framework that merely satisfies these rules on a piecemeal basis represents a missed opportunity. It becomes a cost center, a complex web of processes designed to avoid penalties."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-us-and-eu-best-execution-requirements-for-rfqs/
