# What Are the Key Differences in the Events of Default between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Master Agreements? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-17
**Categories:** Question

---

![Precisely engineered metallic components, including a central pivot, symbolize the market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. This mechanism embodies RFQ protocols facilitating high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and optimal price discovery for crypto options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

![A central teal column embodies Prime RFQ infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. Angled, concentric discs symbolize dynamic market microstructure and volatility surface data, facilitating RFQ protocols and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-alpha-generation-execution.jpg)

## Concept

![A symmetrical, high-tech digital infrastructure depicts an institutional-grade RFQ execution hub. Luminous conduits represent aggregated liquidity for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system.jpg)

## The Evolved Architecture of Default

The transition from the 1992 to the [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) reflects a critical recalibration of [counterparty risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) management. The architecture of default was fundamentally redesigned to enhance clarity, accelerate response times, and remove ambiguities that had been revealed during the market stresses of the late 1990s. The core distinction lies in the 2002 Agreement’s move toward a more objective and streamlined process for resolving defaults, recognizing that in moments of systemic pressure, speed and certainty are paramount. This evolution was driven by a deeper understanding of financial contagion and the need for a more robust framework to insulate the broader market from the failure of a single participant.

At the heart of this redesign is the treatment of time. The 1992 Agreement operated with more lenient grace periods, affording a three-day window for a party to cure a failure to pay or deliver after receiving notice. This buffer, while seemingly prudent, introduced a period of uncertainty where market conditions could deteriorate rapidly. The 2002 framework compresses this timeframe dramatically, shortening the cure period to a single business day.

This seemingly minor adjustment represents a profound shift in philosophy, prioritizing the swift resolution of uncertainty over providing extended latitude to a potentially failing counterparty. It codifies the principle that in a highly interconnected financial system, delays in addressing a default amplify systemic risk.

> The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement introduces a more rigorous and accelerated default resolution framework compared to its 1992 predecessor.

Further, the 2002 Agreement expanded the universe of potential default triggers. The definition of “[Specified Transaction](https://prime.greeks.live/area/specified-transaction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” was broadened, creating a more sensitive tripwire for defaults occurring in related financial dealings outside the immediate ISDA relationship. This acknowledges that a party’s creditworthiness is a holistic attribute, and distress in one area of its operations is a valid signal of risk across all its activities. The introduction of a standardized “[Credit Support Default](https://prime.greeks.live/area/credit-support-default/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” event also brought greater uniformity to how failures related to collateralization are handled, directly linking the integrity of credit support arrangements to the stability of the master agreement itself.

The structural changes were not confined to the triggers of default but extended to the consequences. The 1992 Agreement’s close-out mechanism offered parties a choice between “[Market Quotation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/under-what-specific-market-conditions-would-the-loss-methodology-be-preferable-to-market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” and “Loss” and permitted the controversial “First Method,” a one-way payment system where a [defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-and-financial-risks-when-a-non-defaulting-party-delays-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) might not receive payment even if it were in-the-money on its net position. The 2002 Agreement eliminated this optionality and asymmetry, instituting a single, more flexible “Close-out Amount” methodology.

This standardized approach was designed to produce a more commercially reasonable and objectively verifiable measure of damages, reducing the potential for disputes and litigation in the chaotic aftermath of a default. The mandatory implementation of two-way payments ensures a more equitable outcome, aligning the agreement with market expectations and legal precedents that had evolved over the decade.

![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Strategy

![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

## Calibrating the Default Triggers

The strategic decision to adopt the 2002 [ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) over the 1992 version is fundamentally an exercise in risk calibration. The modifications to the [Events of Default](https://prime.greeks.live/area/events-of-default/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are not merely technical adjustments; they represent a strategic choice to implement a more responsive and less ambiguous system for managing counterparty credit risk. For institutional participants, the key is to understand how these changes create a more resilient operational framework.

The shortened grace periods, for instance, are a strategic tool. They reduce the period of ambiguity during which a [non-defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-and-financial-risks-when-a-non-defaulting-party-delays-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is exposed to a deteriorating credit, allowing for a more rapid and decisive response to protect its own financial position.

The expansion of certain default provisions provides a wider and more sensitive net for detecting counterparty distress. This strategic enhancement is most evident in two key areas ▴ [Credit Support](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-operationally-prepare-for-the-implementation-of-a-new-credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Default and [Default under Specified Transaction](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-expanded-definition-of-specified-transaction-affect-a-firms-credit-monitoring-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- 
**Credit Support Default** ▴ The 2002 Agreement formalizes this as a distinct Event of Default. It is triggered when a party, its Credit Support Provider, or any specified entity fails to comply with its obligations under an applicable credit support document. This elevates the importance of collateral management, making any failure in this area a direct trigger for default under the [master agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-isda-master-agreements-single-agreement-clause-function-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), thereby reinforcing the primacy of collateralization in mitigating risk.

- 
**Default under Specified Transaction** ▴ The 2002 version broadens the definition of “Specified Transaction” to include a wider array of derivative and securities financing transactions. This expansion allows a non-defaulting party to terminate the ISDA relationship based on a default in a broader range of the counterparty’s other financial dealings, providing an earlier warning signal of potential financial instability.

![A dark, precision-engineered module with raised circular elements integrates with a smooth beige housing. It signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols, ensuring robust price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-system-core-high-speed-price-discovery-module.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Cure Periods

The reduction in [cure periods](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cure-periods/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a critical strategic difference that directly impacts the timing of when a non-defaulting party can act. The following table illustrates the operational impact of this change:

| Event of Default | 1992 ISDA Master Agreement | 2002 ISDA Master Agreement |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Failure to Pay or Deliver | Three Local Business Days after notice is given. | One Local Business Day (for payment) or one Local Delivery Day (for delivery) after notice is given. |
| Breach of Agreement | Thirty days after notice is given. | Thirty days after notice is given (remains the same). |

> The 2002 Agreement’s compressed cure periods enable faster defensive action against a defaulting counterparty, minimizing exposure to market volatility.

![A refined object featuring a translucent teal element, symbolizing a dynamic RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precision embodies High-Fidelity Execution and seamless Price Discovery within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-for-optimal-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## The New Termination Events Framework

The [2002 ISDA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) also introduced a more sophisticated framework for handling situations that are not defaults in the traditional sense but still render performance impossible or impracticable. The addition of a “Force Majeure” Termination Event was a direct response to the market disruptions of the early 2000s, including the events of 9/11. This provision allows for the termination of transactions when an event beyond the parties’ control prevents performance. This provides a structured, orderly process for unwinding positions in the face of major external shocks, a strategic advantage over the 1992 Agreement which lacked such a mechanism.

Similarly, the provisions for “Illegality” were refined. The 2002 Agreement clarifies that an Illegality exists even if it only affects a single office of a party, as long as that office is the one through which payments or deliveries for the affected transaction are made. This closes a potential loophole and provides greater certainty when legal or regulatory changes impact the ability of a party to perform its obligations.

![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

![A diagonal composition contrasts a blue intelligence layer, symbolizing market microstructure and volatility surface, with a metallic, precision-engineered execution engine. This depicts high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Execution

![A transparent cylinder containing a white sphere floats between two curved structures, each featuring a glowing teal line. This depicts institutional-grade RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and liquidity aggregation through a Prime RFQ for optimal block trade atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

## Operationalizing Default Management

The execution of default management under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement demands a higher degree of operational readiness. The compressed timeframes and broader default triggers require that institutions have robust monitoring systems and pre-defined action plans. The shift from the 1992 to the 2002 framework is a shift from a reactive to a proactive posture. It is insufficient to simply identify a failure to pay; firms must have systems capable of detecting defaults under specified transactions and breaches of credit support agreements in near real-time.

The close-out process itself is the most critical phase of execution. The 2002 Agreement’s “[Close-out Amount](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” methodology, while more flexible than the 1992 “Market Quotation” or “Loss” methods, requires a rigorous and defensible valuation process. The determining party must act in a commercially reasonable manner to arrive at a valuation that reflects the economic equivalent of the terminated transactions. This involves:

- 
**Information Gathering** ▴ The determining party can use a wide range of information sources, including quotes from third-party dealers, its own internal models, and any other information it deems relevant. This contrasts with the more prescriptive “Market Quotation” method of the 1992 Agreement, which required obtaining quotes from at least three leading dealers.

- 
**Valuation** ▴ The valuation must encompass not only the replacement cost of the terminated transactions but also any reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the termination. The process must be documented thoroughly to withstand potential legal challenges.

- 
**Set-Off Application** ▴ The 2002 Agreement includes an explicit and automatic [set-off provision](https://prime.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (Section 6(f)). This allows the non-defaulting party to set off any amount payable upon early termination against any other amounts owed between the parties, whether under the ISDA Agreement or otherwise. This is a powerful execution tool for consolidating exposures and achieving a net settlement amount. In contrast, under the 1992 Agreement, a set-off provision had to be explicitly added to the Schedule.

![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Key Execution Differences in Default Scenarios

The following table outlines the practical differences in executing a close-out under the two agreements:

| Provision | 1992 ISDA Master Agreement | 2002 ISDA Master Agreement |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Close-out Valuation | Choice between “Market Quotation” (requires dealer quotes) and “Loss” (a broader indemnity-based measure). | A single, flexible “Close-out Amount” determined in a commercially reasonable manner. |
| Payment Direction | Allowed for “First Method” (one-way payments), where a defaulting party might not be paid its net in-the-money amount. | Mandates “Second Method” (two-way payments), ensuring the net value is paid regardless of which party is in default. |
| Set-Off | Not included in the main body; had to be manually added to the Schedule to be effective. | Included as a standard provision (Section 6(f)), applying automatically. |
| Interest on Unpaid Amounts | A single default rate, which could lead to the non-defaulting party paying a high rate if the defaulting party had a high cost of funding. | Differentiated interest rates depending on whether the payor is the defaulting party, providing a more equitable outcome. |

> The 2002 ISDA’s integrated set-off provision and refined interest calculations provide a more efficient and equitable execution of the close-out process.

![Abstract image showing interlocking metallic and translucent blue components, suggestive of a sophisticated RFQ engine. This depicts the precision of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, facilitating high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure for multi-leg spreads and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Navigating Bankruptcy and Automatic Early Termination

A critical aspect of execution involves the Bankruptcy Event of Default. Both agreements provide for this, but its interaction with local insolvency laws is paramount. In many jurisdictions, the automatic stay provisions of bankruptcy law could prevent a non-defaulting party from exercising its right to terminate.

To address this, parties often elect for “[Automatic Early Termination](https://prime.greeks.live/area/automatic-early-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” to apply to a counterparty in their Schedule. If this is elected, the ISDA Master Agreement terminates automatically immediately before the bankruptcy filing, preserving the non-defaulting party’s right to close out and net its positions.

The 2002 Agreement’s structure, with its clear two-way payment obligation and standardized close-out methodology, provides a stronger legal foundation for enforcing these termination rights in a bankruptcy proceeding. The clarity and perceived fairness of the Close-out Amount calculation can be advantageous when presenting the claim to a bankruptcy court or administrator. The execution of a close-out in a bankruptcy scenario is a complex legal and operational process, and the robust framework of the 2002 Agreement provides a superior toolkit for navigating it successfully.

![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## References

- Charles, R. (2012). The ISDA Master Agreement ▴ Part II ▴ Negotiated Provisions. Practical Compliance & Risk Management for the Securities Industry, 34-40.

- Contrarian, J. (2020). ISDA Comparison. The Jolly Contrarian.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. (2018). Understanding the ISDA Master Agreements. ISDA.

- ICLG. (2025). Derivatives Laws and Regulations Close-out Under the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements 2025. ICLG.com.

- Thomson Reuters Practical Law. (n.d.). Comparison of 1992 and 2002 ISDA® Master Agreements.

![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## Reflection

![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## A Framework for Systemic Resilience

The evolution from the 1992 to the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement is a lesson in systemic adaptation. The enhancements to the Events of Default were not isolated legal refinements; they were architectural upgrades to the core operating system of the derivatives market. By analyzing these changes, we gain insight into the nature of financial risk and the constant need to refine the mechanisms that contain it. The 2002 Agreement provides a more robust and responsive framework, but its effectiveness is ultimately determined by the operational readiness of the institutions that use it.

The true measure of this framework is not its presence on a document shelf, but its integration into the live [risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and default protocols of a firm. How does your own operational architecture measure up to the demands of this more rigorous standard?

![Polished concentric metallic and glass components represent an advanced Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and order book dynamics within market microstructure, enabling efficient RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-precision.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## 2002 Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement represents a standardized bilateral contractual framework for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek blue surface with droplets represents a high-fidelity Execution Management System for digital asset derivatives, processing market data. A lighter surface denotes the Principal's Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-for-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Counterparty Risk

Meaning ▴ Counterparty risk denotes the potential for financial loss stemming from a counterparty's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations in a transaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/credit-support-default/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Credit Support Default

Meaning ▴ A Credit Support Default signifies a critical event within the lifecycle of a bilateral derivatives agreement, specifically when a party fails to satisfy its collateral delivery obligations as stipulated by the governing Credit Support Annex. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/specified-transaction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

## Specified Transaction

Meaning ▴ A Specified Transaction represents a pre-defined, pre-authorized, and often automated sequence of operations designed for executing a financial instrument trade or data exchange under precise conditions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/under-what-specific-market-conditions-would-the-loss-methodology-be-preferable-to-market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizing a complex Institutional RFQ ecosystem, angular forms represent multi-leg spread execution pathways and dark liquidity integration. A sharp, precise point symbolizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, highlighting atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Market Quotation

Loss methodology is preferred in illiquid, volatile, or complex markets where obtaining reliable external quotes is impractical or unreasonable. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-and-financial-risks-when-a-non-defaulting-party-delays-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, domed institutional-grade interface with glowing green and blue indicators highlights active RFQ protocols and price discovery. This signifies high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, ensuring real-time liquidity and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg)

## Defaulting Party

Delaying termination converts a contained credit event into an uncompensated grant of market and legal risk to the defaulting party. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A macro view reveals a robust metallic component, signifying a critical interface within a Prime RFQ. This secure mechanism facilitates precise RFQ protocol execution, enabling atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives, embodying high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-secure-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-trade-system-element.jpg)

## Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The ISDA Master Agreement is a standardized contractual framework for privately negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions, establishing common terms for a wide array of financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/events-of-default/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Detailed metallic disc, a Prime RFQ core, displays etched market microstructure. Its central teal dome, an intelligence layer, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Events of Default

Meaning ▴ Events of Default are precisely defined contractual conditions or breaches that, upon occurrence, grant the non-defaulting party specific rights, typically including the right to terminate an agreement, accelerate obligations, or demand collateral. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-and-financial-risks-when-a-non-defaulting-party-delays-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizes the core mechanism of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, highlighting its market microstructure precision. Metallic components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and block trade processing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-1.jpg)

## Non-Defaulting Party

Delaying termination converts a contained credit event into an uncompensated grant of market and legal risk to the defaulting party. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-expanded-definition-of-specified-transaction-affect-a-firms-credit-monitoring-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A high-precision, dark metallic circular mechanism, representing an institutional-grade RFQ engine. Illuminated segments denote dynamic price discovery and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-7.jpg)

## Default under Specified Transaction

An expanded transaction definition forces a firm's credit monitoring system to evolve from a static rule-follower to an adaptive risk-sensing architecture. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-operationally-prepare-for-the-implementation-of-a-new-credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A specialized hardware component, showcasing a robust metallic heat sink and intricate circuit board, symbolizes a Prime RFQ dedicated hardware module for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-dedicated-hardware-for-institutional-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Credit Support

A firm prepares for a new CSA by architecting an integrated system of legal, operational, and technological protocols to manage collateral dynamically. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-isda-master-agreements-single-agreement-clause-function-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Master Agreement

The ISDA's Single Agreement clause is a legal protocol that unifies all transactions into one contract to enable enforceable close-out netting. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cure-periods/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc intersected by a dark bar, over a teal circuit board. This visualizes Institutional Liquidity Pool access via RFQ Protocol, enabling Block Trade Execution of Digital Asset Options with High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-principal-operational-framework-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Cure Periods

Meaning ▴ In financial contracts, particularly derivatives, a Cure Period defines a timeframe for a party to rectify a breach or default. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## 2002 Isda

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement constitutes a standardized contractual framework, widely adopted within the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market, establishing foundational terms for bilateral derivatives transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Close-Out Amount

Meaning ▴ The Close-Out Amount represents the definitive financial value required to terminate a derivatives contract or position, typically calculated upon a default event or a pre-defined termination trigger. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A slender metallic probe extends between two curved surfaces. This abstractly illustrates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, driving price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Set-Off Provision

Meaning ▴ A Set-Off Provision constitutes a contractual or statutory right allowing a party to net mutual debts or claims owed to and by another party, thereby reducing the aggregate gross exposure to a single net amount. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/automatic-early-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Automatic Early Termination

Meaning ▴ Automatic Early Termination (AET) refers to a contractual provision, typically found in master agreements like the ISDA Master Agreement, which stipulates that all outstanding transactions between counterparties are automatically terminated upon the occurrence of a specified insolvency or default event, without requiring any affirmative action or notice. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angularly connected segments portray distinct liquidity pools and RFQ protocols. A speckled grey section highlights granular market microstructure and aggregated inquiry complexities for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-efficiency.jpg)

## Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Risk Management is the systematic process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating potential financial exposures and operational vulnerabilities within an institutional trading framework. </a>

**Tags:** [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://options.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/), [Events of Default](https://options.greeks.live/area/events-of-default/), [Set-Off Provision](https://options.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/), [1992 ISDA](https://options.greeks.live/area/1992-isda/), [1992 ISDA Master Agreement](https://options.greeks.live/area/1992-isda-master-agreement/), [Credit Support Default](https://options.greeks.live/area/credit-support-default/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Constitutes a Commercially Reasonable Procedure for Calculating a Close-Out Amount?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-constitutes-a-commercially-reasonable-procedure-for-calculating-a-close-out-amount/)
![Detailed metallic disc, a Prime RFQ core, displays etched market microstructure. Its central teal dome, an intelligence layer, facilitates price discovery. Protruding rods signify low-latency RFQ protocol data transmission, ensuring high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

A commercially reasonable procedure is an objective, evidence-based method for valuing terminated derivatives to restore economic equivalence.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement Change the Standard for Valuation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-master-agreement-change-the-standard-for-valuation/)
![A diagonal composition contrasts a blue intelligence layer, symbolizing market microstructure and volatility surface, with a metallic, precision-engineered execution engine. This depicts high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement replaced rigid valuation mechanics with a flexible, commercially reasonable 'Close-out Amount' standard.

- 
### [How Does the Rationality Standard of the 1992 ISDA Differ from the 2002 Standard?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-rationality-standard-of-the-1992-isda-differ-from-the-2002-standard/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA standard mandates an objective, commercially reasonable process and result, replacing the 1992's subjective rationality test.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 Isda Standard Impact Dispute Resolution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-standard-impact-dispute-resolution/)
![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA standard refines dispute resolution by replacing rigid valuation methods with a flexible "Close-out Amount" protocol.

- 
### [What Are the Specific Conditions That Trigger a Force Majeure Event under the 2002 Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-specific-conditions-that-trigger-a-force-majeure-event-under-the-2002-agreement/)
![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives. It represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement via a robust Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

A Force Majeure event under the 2002 ISDA agreement is a systemic disruption making performance impossible, triggering a controlled deferral.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements regarding Close-Out Amounts?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements-regarding-close-out-amounts/)
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA replaces the 1992's rigid, optional close-out methods with a single, flexible "Close-out Amount" based on commercial reasonableness.

- 
### [Can Parties Modify the Standard Close-Out Valuation Methods in the ISDA Schedule?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-parties-modify-the-standard-close-out-valuation-methods-in-the-isda-schedule/)
![Two sleek, distinct colored planes, teal and blue, intersect. Dark, reflective spheres at their cross-points symbolize critical price discovery nodes. This abstract visual depicts dynamic liquidity pools and high-fidelity execution protocols within an institutional RFQ framework, enabling efficient multi-leg spread trading of digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-liquidity.jpg)

Parties can modify standard close-out valuation methods via the ISDA Schedule, tailoring the process to their specific risk and commercial needs.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 Isda Agreement Define a Commercially Reasonable Procedure?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-agreement-define-a-commercially-reasonable-procedure/)
![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols. Outer elements reflect liquidity pool dynamics and high-fidelity execution in complex market microstructure, managing counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement defines a commercially reasonable procedure as an objective, good-faith valuation to find a terminated deal's economic equivalent.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA Standard Affect the Likelihood of Legal Disputes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-standard-affect-the-likelihood-of-legal-disputes/)
![A central metallic lens with glowing green concentric circles, flanked by curved grey shapes, embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure, central to a principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-view.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement reduces legal disputes by systemizing counterparty obligations within a single, enforceable framework.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Key Differences in the Events of Default between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Master Agreements?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-events-of-default-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-events-of-default-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Key Differences in the Events of Default between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Master Agreements? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The 2002 ISDA Agreement refines default events with shorter cure periods and a fairer, single close-out valuation method. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-events-of-default-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-17T00:21:38+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-17T00:21:39+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-system-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "A close-up reveals a precise, multi-layered system component in beige and dark blue, highlighted by a bright teal circular indicator. This signifies the Prime RFQ architecture for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution via bilateral RFQ protocols. It emphasizes aggregated inquiry and private quotation mechanisms, ensuring low-latency interconnects for atomic settlement and optimal capital efficiency across market microstructure."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "1992 ISDA",
        "1992 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "2002 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Automatic Early Termination",
        "Close-Out Amount",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Credit Support Default",
        "Cure Periods",
        "Events of Default",
        "Force Majeure Termination Event",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Risk Management",
        "Set-Off Provision",
        "Specified Transaction"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-events-of-default-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreements/
