# What Are the Key Differences in Vendor Evaluation Criteria between a Traditional and a Direct Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated modular component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, featuring an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Its precision engineering facilitates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency for institutional participants](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-module.jpg)

![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Concept

The selection of a vendor is a foundational moment in the life cycle of any system. It is the point where abstract requirements are translated into a tangible partnership that will dictate operational capacity for years. The mechanism for this selection, the Request for Proposal (RFP), is often viewed through a purely procedural lens.

This perspective, however, overlooks a fundamental divergence in philosophy that manifests in two distinct approaches ▴ the [traditional RFP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/traditional-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and the direct RFP. The difference in their respective [vendor evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is not a matter of slight adjustments in priority; it represents two separate views on how value is created, how risk is managed, and how innovation is incorporated into an organization’s operational fabric.

A traditional RFP operates as a prescriptive blueprint. It is born from a paradigm of control and predictability. The issuing organization invests significant resources upfront to define its needs with granular precision, outlining every known technical requirement, service level, and deliverable. The resulting document is a rigid framework, and the evaluation process becomes an exercise in compliance checking.

Vendors are measured by their ability to conform to this pre-existing mold. The criteria are, by necessity, quantitative and objective ▴ cost, adherence to specifications, and documented past performance. The core assumption is that the buyer possesses complete knowledge of the optimal solution and requires a vendor to execute that vision with minimal deviation.

Conversely, a [direct RFP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/direct-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) functions as a [collaborative design](https://prime.greeks.live/area/collaborative-design/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) document. It originates from a recognition that complex problems, particularly in the realm of financial technology, often have solutions that are not fully known at the outset. Instead of providing a rigid set of specifications, the direct RFP presents a strategic challenge or a business objective. It invites potential partners into a dialogue.

The [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), therefore, shift from measuring compliance to assessing capability. The focus moves to a vendor’s problem-solving methodology, the depth of their team’s expertise, their technological vision, and their capacity for co-development. This approach assumes that value is found through an iterative, collaborative process with a skilled partner, not just in the execution of a predefined task.

Understanding this distinction is paramount. The choice between these two methodologies determines the kind of partner an organization attracts and the nature of the value it can ultimately unlock. The evaluation criteria are merely the tangible expression of a deeper strategic choice ▴ whether to procure a commodity or to cultivate a capability.

![A teal-blue textured sphere, signifying a unique RFQ inquiry or private quotation, precisely mounts on a metallic, institutional-grade base. Integrated into a Prime RFQ framework, it illustrates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-execution-1.jpg)

![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

![Visualizing a complex Institutional RFQ ecosystem, angular forms represent multi-leg spread execution pathways and dark liquidity integration. A sharp, precise point symbolizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, highlighting atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## The Philosophical Divide in Vendor Assessment

The strategic divergence between traditional and direct RFP models is rooted in their core philosophies of risk and value. A traditional [RFP process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is fundamentally an exercise in risk mitigation through exhaustive specification. The strategy is to de-risk the procurement by transferring the burden of performance onto a rigid contractual framework based on a vendor’s ability to meet a checklist of requirements. Value is perceived as the successful delivery of these specified items at the lowest possible cost.

The evaluation, therefore, prioritizes vendors who demonstrate low-risk profiles ▴ financial stability, a long history of similar projects, and a willingness to agree to stringent service level agreements. The process is designed to produce a predictable, auditable outcome where the vendor is an interchangeable implementer of a static plan.

The direct RFP strategy, in contrast, is one of opportunity capture through collaborative partnership. It acknowledges that in dynamic environments like technology and finance, the greatest risk is not a minor budget overrun but the opportunity cost of selecting a partner who cannot adapt or innovate. Value is defined by the potential for future growth, the creation of a unique competitive advantage, and the ability to solve unforeseen challenges.

The evaluation strategy seeks to identify not just a supplier, but a partner with a compatible vision and a demonstrated capacity for creative problem-solving. This approach willingly accepts a degree of ambiguity in the initial scope in exchange for the potential of a far superior, co-created outcome.

> The choice of an RFP model is a strategic declaration of whether an organization prioritizes the mitigation of known risks or the pursuit of emergent opportunities.

![Central metallic hub connects beige conduits, representing an institutional RFQ engine for digital asset derivatives. It facilitates multi-leg spread execution, ensuring atomic settlement, optimal price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub.jpg)

## Mapping the Evaluation Domains

The differing strategic goals of each [RFP model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) give rise to distinct sets of evaluation criteria. While some overlap exists, the emphasis and interpretation of these criteria vary significantly. The traditional model focuses on verifiable, historical data, while the direct model assesses future potential and dynamic capabilities.

A comparative analysis reveals this strategic schism:

### Table 1 ▴ Comparative Vendor Evaluation Criteria

| Evaluation Domain | Traditional RFP Focus (Compliance-Based) | Direct RFP Focus (Capability-Based) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Financials | Emphasis on historical financial stability (e.g. balance sheets, credit ratings) to ensure the vendor can fulfill the contract without going bankrupt. | Analysis of investment in R&D, funding sources, and financial runway as indicators of a commitment to innovation and long-term growth. |
| Technical | Strict compliance with a detailed list of technical specifications and features. Scoring is based on a feature-by-feature checklist. | Assessment of the underlying architecture, API flexibility, scalability, and the technical team’s ability to adapt and integrate with evolving systems. |
| Experience | Heavy reliance on case studies and references from past projects of identical scope and scale. | Evaluation of the core team’s experience in solving analogous problems, even in different industries, and their methodological approach to new challenges. |
| Pricing | Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) based on a detailed and fixed pricing schedule for specified deliverables. Price is often a heavily weighted factor. | Value-based pricing models, potential for joint go-to-market strategies, and flexibility in commercial terms to align incentives for a long-term partnership. |
| Team | Review of organizational charts and CVs of key personnel assigned to the project. | Direct interaction with the proposed team through workshops and collaborative sessions to assess cultural fit, communication style, and problem-solving dynamics. |

![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Information Asymmetry and the Evaluation Process

Every [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) contends with [information asymmetry](https://prime.greeks.live/area/information-asymmetry/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ▴ the vendor knows more about their capabilities and the buyer knows more about their needs. The two RFP models treat this asymmetry in fundamentally different ways.

- **The Traditional Approach** seeks to neutralize information asymmetry through standardization. By forcing all vendors to answer the same exhaustive list of questions in a uniform format, the process aims to create a level playing field for comparison. The evaluation is an analysis of these static documents, with the goal of making an objective, “apples-to-apples” decision. The drawback of this method is that it often prevents vendors from showcasing their unique strengths or proposing innovative solutions that fall outside the rigid RFP structure. It optimizes for comparability at the expense of potential discovery. 

- **The Direct Approach**, on the other hand, embraces and leverages information asymmetry as a source of value. It is structured as a progressive and mutual discovery process. The initial document is a conversation starter, not a final exam. The evaluation consists of a series of interactions ▴ workshops, deep-dive sessions, proof-of-concept challenges ▴ designed for the buyer to learn about the vendor’s unique capabilities and for the vendor to gain a deeper understanding of the buyer’s underlying business problems. The goal is to find the partner with the best-aligned capabilities, not just the one who wrote the most compliant proposal. 

![A sleek, light interface, a Principal's Prime RFQ, overlays a dark, intricate market microstructure. This represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, showcasing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-system.jpg)

![Metallic rods and translucent, layered panels against a dark backdrop. This abstract visualizes advanced RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Execution

![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

## Procedural Divergence in Evaluation Mechanics

The execution of [vendor evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-unclear-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp-affect-vendor-bids/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) under each RFP model follows a distinct procedural path. The mechanics of the process are tailored to serve the model’s underlying philosophy, leading to different forms of engagement, decision-making tools, and stakeholder involvement. The traditional process is linear and gated, designed for efficient filtering. The direct process is iterative and adaptive, designed for deep exploration.

A step-by-step comparison highlights the operational differences:

- **Initial Screening** ▴ In a traditional RFP, this is a paper-based exercise. A procurement team screens proposals for mandatory compliance. Any vendor failing to meet a mandatory requirement (e.g. a specific security certification, minimum years in business) is immediately disqualified. In a direct RFP, the initial screening is based on a vendor’s response to a high-level strategic problem, assessing their conceptual approach and demonstrated understanding of the business context. 

- **Down-Selection** ▴ The traditional model uses a [weighted scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) applied to the written proposals. Criteria are scored and weighted, and a shortlist is created based on the highest-scoring vendors. The direct model’s down-selection is based on the quality of initial conversations and workshops. The evaluation team selects vendors who demonstrate the most promising collaborative potential and technical vision. 

- **Deep Evaluation** ▴ For traditional RFPs, this stage involves product demonstrations aimed at verifying the features claimed in the proposal. It is a confirmatory step. For direct RFPs, this is the core of the evaluation. It involves collaborative, multi-day workshops and/or a competitive proof-of-concept (PoC) where shortlisted vendors work with the buyer’s team to build a partial solution to a real problem. 

- **Final Selection** ▴ The final decision in a traditional process is often made by a steering committee based on a review of the scoring data and a “best and final offer” (BAFO) on price. The final decision in a direct process is a consensus choice made by the cross-functional team that participated in the workshops and PoC, based on a holistic assessment of which vendor is the best long-term partner. 

![Abstract depiction of an institutional digital asset derivatives execution system. A central market microstructure wheel supports a Prime RFQ framework, revealing an algorithmic trading engine for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads and block trades via advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Quantitative Scoring Models a Comparative Analysis

The tools used for quantitative assessment differ as profoundly as the processes themselves. The traditional RFP relies on [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to create an objective, defensible decision. The direct RFP uses scorecards to structure a more qualitative, capability-focused assessment.

The following table illustrates a typical weighted scoring matrix used in a traditional RFP for a technology platform. The focus is on compliance and cost.

### Table 2 ▴ Traditional RFP Weighted Scoring Matrix

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Vendor A Score (1-5) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (1-5) | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Adherence to Functional Specifications | 35% | 5 | 1.75 | 4 | 1.40 |
| Annual Licensing Cost | 30% | 3 | 0.90 | 5 | 1.50 |
| SLA Compliance & Support Terms | 20% | 4 | 0.80 | 4 | 0.80 |
| Vendor Financial Stability | 15% | 5 | 0.75 | 3 | 0.45 |
| Total Score | 100% | | 4.20 | | 4.15 |

In this model, Vendor A wins, primarily due to perfect functional adherence and superior stability, despite a higher cost. The decision is mathematically justifiable. Price follows value.

In contrast, a direct RFP might use a capability scorecard, which structures the evaluation of more subjective, forward-looking attributes. The commentary and justification for each score become as important as the number itself.

> The evaluation framework of a traditional RFP is built to find the most compliant vendor, while the framework of a direct RFP is designed to discover the most capable partner.

![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives execution system cutaway. The teal Prime RFQ casing reveals intricate market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

## The Proof of Concept as an Evaluation Tool

The role and nature of a Proof of Concept (PoC) are perhaps the clearest illustration of the executional differences. In a traditional framework, the PoC is a final validation step. Its purpose is to confirm that the product functions as advertised and meets the key specifications outlined in the RFP. It is typically a standardized demonstration, often on the vendor’s own servers with their own data.

Success is binary ▴ the feature either works or it does not. The evaluation team observes a performance.

Within a direct RFP context, the PoC is a collaborative working session. It is an evaluation tool not for a finished product, but for the vendor’s team and methodology. The buyer will provide a genuine, unsolved business problem and a dataset.

The vendor’s team is then expected to work alongside the buyer’s stakeholders to build a functioning prototype over a period of days or weeks. The evaluation criteria are profoundly different:

- **Problem Diagnosis** ▴ How well does the vendor team listen and understand the nuances of the business problem? Do they challenge assumptions constructively? 

- **Collaborative Dynamics** ▴ How effectively do their engineers, product managers, and designers integrate with the buyer’s team? Is there a cultural and communicative fit? 

- **Technical Agility** ▴ How quickly can they iterate? How do they handle unexpected roadblocks or changes in requirements? 

- **Innovative Contribution** ▴ Do they simply build what is asked, or do they leverage their expertise to propose better, more elegant solutions? 

This form of PoC evaluates the process of creation, not just the resulting artifact. It provides invaluable data on what it would be like to work with the vendor as a long-term partner in tackling future, unknown challenges.

It is here, in the crucible of a collaborative PoC, that the true nature of a potential partner is revealed. One must question the entire premise of a “fair” evaluation when the objective is to form a unique, non-standard partnership. The tension between the auditable necessities of procurement and the creative imperatives of strategic design is a difficult but essential space for modern organizations to navigate. The direct RFP, for all its ambiguity, provides a framework for this navigation.

![A transparent sphere, representing a granular digital asset derivative or RFQ quote, precisely balances on a proprietary execution rail. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution within complex market microstructure, driven by rapid price discovery from an institutional-grade trading engine, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-precision-1.jpg)

## References

- Nagri, Idris. “Selecting a Technology Partner – Key to a Successful RFP Process.” _The Global Treasurer_, 13 Jan. 2011.

- “What is RFP vendor selection?” _Arphie – AI_, Accessed 7 Aug. 2025.

- “12 RFP Evaluation Criteria to Consider in 2025.” _Procurement Tactics_, Accessed 7 Aug. 2025.

- “A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples.” _Responsive_, 14 Jan. 2021.

- “RFP Best Practices ▴ A Strategic Approach to Tech Procurement.” _Bridgepointe Technologies_, 6 Mar. 2025.

- Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under Uncertainty ▴ Heuristics and Biases.” _Science_, vol. 185, no. 4157, 1974, pp. 1124 ▴ 31.

- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” _Academy of Management Review_, vol. 14, no. 4, 1989, pp. 532 ▴ 50.

- Porter, Michael E. “Competitive Advantage ▴ Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.” Free Press, 1985.

![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## The RFP as a Statement of Corporate Identity

Ultimately, the set of criteria an organization chooses for vendor evaluation does more than select a supplier; it holds up a mirror to the organization itself. The decision to employ a traditional or a direct RFP process is a declaration of the organization’s core beliefs about how it will compete and grow. A heavily weighted, cost-focused, and compliance-driven evaluation framework signals an institution that prioritizes operational stability, predictability, and budgetary control. It is an entirely valid stance for entities operating in highly regulated or commoditized markets where differentiation is minimal.

Conversely, an evaluation process centered on collaborative workshops, capability assessments, and shared-risk commercial models signals an organization that sees technology and partnerships as primary drivers of competitive advantage. It reflects a culture that is comfortable with ambiguity and values learning and adaptation over rigid planning. This choice indicates a belief that the most significant opportunities are not yet defined and that the right partners are essential for discovering and capturing them.

The evaluation criteria become a tool not just for procurement, but for strategic self-definition. The question for any leader is not simply “Which RFP process is better?” but “Which evaluation philosophy reflects the kind of company we intend to be?”

![A multi-faceted geometric object with varied reflective surfaces rests on a dark, curved base. It embodies complex RFQ protocols and deep liquidity pool dynamics, representing advanced market microstructure for precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/multi-faceted-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-infrastructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Brushed metallic and colored modular components represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. The precise engineering signifies high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency within a sophisticated market microstructure for multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Vendor Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Vendor Evaluation Criteria define a structured framework employed by institutional entities to systematically assess the suitability and performance of third-party service providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/traditional-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, precision-engineered module with raised circular elements integrates with a smooth beige housing. It signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols, ensuring robust price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-system-core-high-speed-price-discovery-module.jpg)

## Traditional Rfp

Meaning ▴ A Traditional Request for Proposal, or RFP, represents a formal, structured solicitation document issued by an institutional entity to prospective vendors, requesting detailed proposals for a specific product, service, or complex solution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/collaborative-design/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central RFQ engine drives block trades and price discovery with high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Collaborative Design

Meaning ▴ Collaborative Design defines a structured, iterative co-development methodology where institutional Principals and their technology partners jointly engineer and refine bespoke trading solutions, execution protocols, or systemic components within the digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/direct-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Direct Rfp

Meaning ▴ A Direct RFP, or Request For Quote, constitutes a specific mechanism where an institutional Principal directly solicits executable price quotes from a select group of designated liquidity providers for a defined digital asset and quantity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract clear and teal geometric forms, including a central lens, intersect a reflective metallic surface on black. This embodies market microstructure precision, algorithmic trading for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

An RFP's evaluation criteria weighting is the strategic calibration of a decision-making architecture to deliver an optimal, defensible outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## Rfp Process

Meaning ▴ The Request for Proposal (RFP) Process defines a formal, structured procurement methodology employed by institutional Principals to solicit detailed proposals from potential vendors for complex technological solutions or specialized services, particularly within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives infrastructure and trading systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished blue sphere representing a digital asset derivative rests on a metallic ring, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocols, supported by a foundational beige sphere, an institutional liquidity pool. A smaller blue sphere floats above, denoting atomic settlement or a private quotation within a Principal's Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-and-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Rfp Model

Meaning ▴ The RFP Model, or Request for Quote Model, defines a structured electronic protocol for bilateral or multilateral price discovery and execution of specific digital asset derivative instruments, particularly those characterized by lower liquidity or larger notional values. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/information-asymmetry/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, metallic, circular mechanism with central spindle and concentric rings embodies a Prime RFQ for Atomic Settlement. A precise black bar, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution via FIX Protocol, traverses the surface, highlighting Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives and RFQ inquiries, enabling Capital Efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Information Asymmetry

Meaning ▴ Information Asymmetry refers to a condition in a transaction or market where one party possesses superior or exclusive data relevant to the asset, counterparty, or market state compared to others. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes and transparent spheres represent complex market microstructure. A central luminous core signifies efficient price discovery and atomic settlement via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-4.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-unclear-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp-affect-vendor-bids/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A large, smooth sphere, a textured metallic sphere, and a smaller, swirling sphere rest on an angular, dark, reflective surface. This visualizes a principal liquidity pool, complex structured product, and dynamic volatility surface, representing high-fidelity execution within an institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimized-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Vendor Evaluation

Unclear RFP criteria inject systemic risk, forcing vendors to price for ambiguity and delivering suboptimal, non-comparable bids. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous conical element projects from a multi-faceted transparent teal crystal, signifying RFQ protocol precision and price discovery. This embodies institutional grade digital asset derivatives high-fidelity execution, leveraging Prime RFQ for liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-rfq-protocol-orchestration-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Matrix

Simple scoring treats all RFP criteria equally; weighted scoring applies strategic importance to each, creating a more intelligent evaluation system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A smooth, off-white sphere rests within a meticulously engineered digital asset derivatives RFQ platform, featuring distinct teal and dark blue metallic components. This sophisticated market microstructure enables private quotation, high-fidelity execution, and optimized price discovery for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-microstructure-core.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a>

**Tags:** [Vendor Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-evaluation-criteria/), [Direct RFP](https://options.greeks.live/area/direct-rfp/), [Financial Technology Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/financial-technology-sourcing/), [Proof-of-Concept (POC)](https://options.greeks.live/area/proof-of-concept-poc/), [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/), [Vendor Risk Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-risk-management/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks to the Integrity of an Rfp Process and How Can They Be Mitigated?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-to-the-integrity-of-an-rfp-process-and-how-can-they-be-mitigated/)
![Intersecting geometric planes symbolize complex market microstructure and aggregated liquidity. A central nexus represents an RFQ hub for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies. Underlying illumination denotes the Prime RFQ, optimizing portfolio margin and precise price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-optimisation.jpg)

A resilient RFP process mitigates risk by transforming it from a document into a defensible system for objective, value-based acquisition.

- 
### [Can an Agile Approach to Procurement Reduce the Risks Associated with High Rfp Complexity?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-an-agile-approach-to-procurement-reduce-the-risks-associated-with-high-rfp-complexity/)
![A complex, multi-faceted crystalline object rests on a dark, reflective base against a black background. This abstract visual represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. It symbolizes multi-leg spreads, implied volatility surfaces, and the precise price discovery within RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-architecture.jpg)

An agile procurement framework deconstructs high-risk, monolithic RFPs into iterative, value-focused cycles, enhancing adaptability.

- 
### [In What Ways Does a Flawed RFP Process Stifle Innovation and Reinforce Market Incumbency?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-does-a-flawed-rfp-process-stifle-innovation-and-reinforce-market-incumbency/)
![A marbled sphere symbolizes a complex institutional block trade, resting on segmented platforms representing diverse liquidity pools and execution venues. This visualizes sophisticated RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within dynamic market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. It reflects capital efficiency and intelligent smart order routing.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-aggregation-digital-asset-derivative-execution-optimization.jpg)

A flawed RFP's prescriptive nature systematically filters out novel solutions, entrenching incumbents and stifling market evolution.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Hybrid Rfp and a Traditional Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-hybrid-rfp-and-a-traditional-rfp-process/)
![Abstract geometric representation of an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Two distinct segments symbolize cross-market liquidity pools and order book dynamics. A central, illuminated conduit signifies high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within a Principal's operational framework, optimizing block trade settlement and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-2.jpg)

A hybrid RFP merges collaborative flexibility with formal structure, while a traditional RFP follows a rigid, sequential protocol.

- 
### [How Does a Transparent Evaluation Criterial in an Rfp Influence Vendor Behavior and Proposal Quality?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-transparent-evaluation-criterial-in-an-rfp-influence-vendor-behavior-and-proposal-quality/)
![A sleek, spherical white and blue module featuring a central black aperture and teal lens, representing the core Intelligence Layer for Institutional Trading in Digital Asset Derivatives. It visualizes High-Fidelity Execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling precise Price Discovery and optimizing the Principal's Operational Framework for Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

Transparent evaluation criteria systematically shift vendor focus from persuasion to proof, yielding higher quality, data-driven proposals.

- 
### [How Does a Hybrid Rfp Mitigate the Risks Associated with Complex It Projects?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-hybrid-rfp-mitigate-the-risks-associated-with-complex-it-projects/)
![A precisely engineered multi-component structure, split to reveal its granular core, symbolizes the complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor represents the unbundling of multi-leg spreads, facilitating transparent price discovery and high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-revealing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-within-principals-operational-framework.jpg)

A hybrid RFP de-risks complex IT procurements by replacing rigid specification with a structured, evidence-based, adaptive collaboration.

- 
### [How Do You Measure the Success of an Rfp Facilitator?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-measure-the-success-of-an-rfp-facilitator/)
![Abstract, layered spheres symbolize complex market microstructure and liquidity pools. A central reflective conduit represents RFQ protocols enabling block trade execution and precise price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, ensuring high-fidelity execution within institutional trading of digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity.jpg)

Measuring an RFP facilitator's success is quantifying their ability to architect a procurement system that yields maximum strategic value.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Traditional Rfp Committee and a Specialized Evaluation Team?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-traditional-rfp-committee-and-a-specialized-evaluation-team/)
![A dynamic visual representation of an institutional trading system, featuring a central liquidity aggregation engine emitting a controlled order flow through dedicated market infrastructure. This illustrates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery within a private quotation environment for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-os-driving-high-fidelity-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives-through-optimized-rfq-protocols-and-smart-order-routing.jpg)

A traditional RFP committee ensures procedural fairness, while a specialized evaluation team delivers strategic procurement decisions.

- 
### [How Does a Collaborative Rfp Differ from a Traditional Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-collaborative-rfp-differ-from-a-traditional-rfp-process/)
![A precision mechanism with a central circular core and a linear element extending to a sharp tip, encased in translucent material. This symbolizes an institutional RFQ protocol's market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives. It represents the Prime RFQ intelligence layer ensuring atomic settlement and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

A collaborative RFP is an iterative value-discovery system, while a traditional RFP is a linear price-discovery mechanism.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Key Differences in Vendor Evaluation Criteria between a Traditional and a Direct Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-vendor-evaluation-criteria-between-a-traditional-and-a-direct-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-vendor-evaluation-criteria-between-a-traditional-and-a-direct-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Key Differences in Vendor Evaluation Criteria between a Traditional and a Direct Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The choice between traditional and direct RFP evaluation hinges on valuing compliance with known specs versus assessing capability for future innovation. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-vendor-evaluation-criteria-between-a-traditional-and-a-direct-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T21:41:05+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T21:41:07+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-rfq-protocol-orchestration-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "The image depicts a luminous conical element projecting from a multi-faceted transparent teal crystal, symbolizing advanced RFQ protocol execution. This sophisticated visual metaphor represents institutional grade digital asset derivatives trading, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery across complex market microstructure. It illustrates the Prime RFQ capability to manage multi-leg spreads, optimize portfolio margin, and facilitate block trade liquidity aggregation, ensuring systemic risk mitigation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Capability-Based Assessment",
        "Collaborative Design",
        "Compliance-Based Evaluation",
        "Direct RFP",
        "Financial Technology Sourcing",
        "Information Asymmetry",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Proof-of-Concept (POC)",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Model",
        "RFP Process",
        "RFP Scoring Models",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Technology Procurement",
        "Traditional RFP",
        "Vendor Evaluation Criteria",
        "Vendor Risk Management"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-vendor-evaluation-criteria-between-a-traditional-and-a-direct-rfp/
