# What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases in a Single Stage Rfp Evaluation? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

![An abstract visual depicts a central intelligent execution hub, symbolizing the core of a Principal's operational framework. Two intersecting planes represent multi-leg spread strategies and cross-asset liquidity pools, enabling private quotation and aggregated inquiry for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Concept

The single-stage Request for Proposal (RFP) evaluation is an organizational system designed for a singular purpose ▴ to process complex information and render a high-stakes decision on a strategic partner. Yet, the very architecture of this system, intended to foster objective comparison, creates fertile ground for cognitive distortions. These are not mere errors in judgment; they are systemic vulnerabilities, predictable patterns of deviation from rationality that can corrupt the evaluation process from its inception. Understanding these biases is the foundational step in re-engineering the decision-making framework to deliver its intended outcome ▴ the selection of the optimal vendor, not just the most comfortable or cheapest one.

At the heart of the single-stage evaluation’s vulnerability is the simultaneous exposure of evaluators to a vendor’s qualitative solution and its price. This fusion of information does not lead to a more holistic view. Instead, it triggers a cascade of mental shortcuts. The price, a single, potent number, becomes an anchor, a powerful gravitational point around which all other information is interpreted.

This phenomenon, known as [anchoring bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/anchoring-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), means that a low price can cast a “halo” over a mediocre technical proposal, making its flaws seem less significant. Conversely, a high price can create a “horns effect,” causing evaluators to scrutinize a superior solution with undue skepticism, actively seeking out weaknesses to justify their initial sticker shock. The evaluation ceases to be a dispassionate assessment of value and instead becomes a subconscious effort to reconcile all data points with the initial anchor.

![Close-up reveals robust metallic components of an institutional-grade execution management system. Precision-engineered surfaces and central pivot signify high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-precision-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-best-execution-and-prime-os.jpg)

## The Architecture of Distorted Judgment

The human mind is a sense-making machine, and in the context of an RFP, it seeks the path of least cognitive resistance. A single-stage evaluation presents a complex, multi-dimensional problem ▴ comparing disparate solutions across numerous criteria ▴ and invites the brain to simplify it. This is where several interconnected biases take hold, creating a web of flawed reasoning that is difficult to untangle.

![A symmetrical, high-tech digital infrastructure depicts an institutional-grade RFQ execution hub. Luminous conduits represent aggregated liquidity for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system.jpg)

## Confirmation Bias the Gravitational Pull of First Impressions

[Confirmation bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is arguably the most pervasive and damaging distortion in an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It is the tendency for evaluators to favor information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or initial hypotheses. An evaluator who has a positive prior relationship with a vendor, or is simply impressed by a slick presentation, will subconsciously seek out and give more weight to evidence that supports this positive impression.

Data points that contradict this initial feeling are often downplayed, scrutinized more harshly, or dismissed as outliers. In a single-stage process, this bias can be triggered instantly by brand recognition, a well-known name, or even the aesthetic quality of the proposal document itself, long before the substantive details are analyzed.

![A sleek, dark sphere, symbolizing the Intelligence Layer of a Prime RFQ, rests on a sophisticated institutional grade platform. Its surface displays volatility surface data, hinting at quantitative analysis for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-intelligence-layer-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Lower-Bid Bias a Gravitational Anomaly

Experimental studies in government procurement have identified a specific and powerful distortion termed the “Lower-Bid Bias.” This occurs when the knowledge of a lower price systematically inflates the perceived quality of the non-price components of a bid. Evaluators, under pressure to be fiscally responsible, may subconsciously adjust their scoring of technical merits, project plans, and team qualifications upward to align with the “attractive” price point. The desire for the lower bid to be the “correct” choice leads to an evaluation that supports that perception, a clear manifestation of confirmation bias triggered by the price anchor.

> A single-stage RFP evaluation, by presenting price and quality simultaneously, creates a cognitive field where the objective assessment of value is distorted by the gravitational pull of cost.

![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Availability Heuristic the Tyranny of the Recent and Vivid

The [availability heuristic](https://prime.greeks.live/area/availability-heuristic/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) describes our tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events that are more easily recalled in memory. In an RFP context, an evaluator might give undue weight to a vendor based on a recent positive news article, a conversation with a colleague, or a memorable advertisement. A vendor who has recently completed a successful, highly visible project for a competitor might be perceived as a safer choice, even if their specific proposal for the current project is weaker than that of a less-known competitor. The vividness of the recalled information makes it feel more significant than the dry, detailed data presented in the competing proposals.

These biases do not operate in isolation. They form a self-reinforcing system. An initial positive feeling (confirmation bias) might be triggered by a familiar brand (availability heuristic), which is then amplified by a competitive price (anchoring and the lower-bid bias), leading the evaluator to interpret every section of that vendor’s proposal through a positive lens ([halo effect](https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)).

This cascade can lead to a “flawed selection decision” even when every evaluator believes they are acting with complete objectivity and diligence. The flaw is not in the intent of the evaluators, but in the architecture of the evaluation process itself.

![Abstract forms depict interconnected institutional liquidity pools and intricate market microstructure. Sharp algorithmic execution paths traverse smooth aggregated inquiry surfaces, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-1.jpg)

![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Strategy

Mitigating [cognitive biases](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-biases/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in an RFP evaluation is not a matter of simply telling evaluators to “be more objective.” It requires a strategic redesign of the evaluation architecture itself. The goal is to move from a process that is vulnerable to subconscious distortions to one that systematically insulates the decision-making process from them. This involves deconstructing the single-stage evaluation and rebuilding it with controls and protocols that force a more deliberate and dispassionate analysis. The core strategic principle is the separation of distinct analytical tasks to prevent the premature contamination of one judgment by another.

![Geometric planes and transparent spheres represent complex market microstructure. A central luminous core signifies efficient price discovery and atomic settlement via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-4.jpg)

## Deconstructing the Monolithic Evaluation

The fundamental flaw of the [single-stage RFP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/single-stage-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is its monolithic nature ▴ all information is presented at once, inviting the human brain to create a single, simplified narrative. The primary strategy, therefore, is to break this monolith into a sequence of independent assessments. This approach is often referred to as a two-stage or multi-stage evaluation. By isolating the evaluation of qualitative, technical components from the consideration of price, the system prevents the price from becoming a distorting anchor.

![A stylized depiction of institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ execution. A central glowing liquidity pool for price discovery is precisely pierced by an algorithmic trading path, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and slippage minimization within market microstructure via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Stage 1 the Quality and Technical Deep Dive

In the first stage, the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is provided with the full technical and qualitative proposals from all vendors, but with all pricing information redacted. Their sole mandate is to assess the solutions against a pre-defined, weighted set of criteria. This forces a pure, value-based analysis.

Evaluators must engage with the substance of the proposals ▴ the technical approach, the team’s expertise, the project management plan, the [risk mitigation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) strategies ▴ without the cognitive shortcut of a price point to guide their feelings. This “value first” approach ensures that the assessment of a proposal’s quality is performed on its own merits.

- **Structured Scoring Rubrics** ▴ A key tool in this stage is a highly structured scoring rubric. Instead of vague criteria like “strong technical solution,” the rubric should break down requirements into specific, measurable components. For example, a “Technical Solution” category might be subdivided into “Scalability,” “Security Protocols,” “Integration APIs,” and “User Interface Design,” each with its own definition of what constitutes a score of 1 through 5. This granularity forces evaluators to justify their scores with specific evidence from the proposal, reducing the influence of a generalized “halo effect.”

- **Forced Ranking and Comparative Analysis** ▴ After individual scoring, the committee should engage in a process of forced ranking or pairwise comparison. This requires them to debate the relative strengths of different proposals on specific criteria. Forcing a choice ▴ ”Is Vendor A’s security protocol superior to Vendor B’s, and why?” ▴ compels a deeper level of analytical rigor than simply assigning independent scores.

- **Anonymization Protocols** ▴ Where feasible, anonymizing proposals can further reduce bias. By removing vendor names and branding, evaluators are forced to confront the solution itself, free from the influence of brand reputation or past relationships (combating confirmation bias and the availability heuristic). While not always practical, this technique represents a powerful ideal.

![Sleek, domed institutional-grade interface with glowing green and blue indicators highlights active RFQ protocols and price discovery. This signifies high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, ensuring real-time liquidity and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg)

## Stage 2 the Price Reveal and Value Calculation

Only after the qualitative evaluation is complete and the scores are locked should the pricing be revealed. At this point, the process shifts from assessment to calculation. The pre-determined formula, combining the quality score with the price, is applied to generate a final value-for-money score for each vendor. The strategic separation of these stages ensures that the price is used as a mathematical input, not as a psychological anchor.

![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Comparative Frameworks Standard Vs Bias-Aware Evaluation

The strategic shift from a standard to a bias-aware evaluation framework can be visualized through a direct comparison of their core processes and inherent risks.

| Process Component | Standard Single-Stage Process | Bias-Aware Multi-Stage Process |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Information Flow | All information (technical, qualitative, price) is presented simultaneously to all evaluators. | Information is staged. Technical/qualitative proposals are evaluated first, with pricing information withheld until scoring is complete. |
| Primary Bias Risk | Anchoring, Lower-Bid Bias, Halo/Horns Effect. Price distorts the perception of quality. | Minimized risk of price-based biases. Focus shifts to mitigating interpersonal biases (e.g. groupthink). |
| Evaluation Criteria | Often high-level and subjective, allowing for significant interpretation by evaluators. | Highly granular, pre-defined, and weighted scoring rubrics are mandatory. |
| Decision Justification | Justifications can be vague and influenced by overall “feelings” about a proposal. | Scores for each criterion must be justified with specific evidence from the proposal document. |
| Role of the Committee | Discussion can be unstructured, allowing dominant personalities or groupthink to sway the outcome. | Process is structured to encourage diverse voices and require consensus based on evidence. A facilitator may be used to enforce the rules. |

> A bias-aware strategy does not seek to eliminate human judgment, but to structure it, ensuring that judgment is applied to the right information at the right time.

Implementing this strategic framework requires a commitment from leadership. It may appear more time-consuming than a single-stage review, but the investment in process integrity pays dividends by reducing the risk of a flawed selection, which can have long-term financial and operational consequences far exceeding the administrative cost of a more rigorous evaluation.

![A central dark nexus with intersecting data conduits and swirling translucent elements depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol's intelligence layer. This visualizes dynamic market microstructure, precise price discovery, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-visualizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a bias-resistant RFP evaluation transforms strategic principles into a concrete, operational protocol. This is a system of checks and balances designed to guide the evaluation team through a series of deliberate, evidence-based steps. Success hinges on rigorous adherence to the process, clear documentation, and the use of quantitative tools to discipline subjective judgment. The following playbook outlines a robust, multi-stage execution framework.

![A cutaway view reveals the intricate core of an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution engine. The central price discovery aperture, flanked by pre-trade analytics layers, represents high-fidelity execution capabilities for multi-leg spread and private quotation via RFQ protocols for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-price-discovery-on-volatility-surface.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Bias-Resistant Evaluation

This playbook is structured as a sequential process, with each stage designed to build upon the last while preventing contamination from future information, particularly price.

- 
**Establish the Evaluation Charter** ▴ Before the RFP is even released, the evaluation committee must be formed and a formal charter established. This document is the constitution for the evaluation. It must define:

<li>The members of the evaluation committee, selected for diverse expertise.

- The independent facilitator, whose role is to enforce the process, not to evaluate proposals.

- The detailed, weighted evaluation criteria and the granular scoring rubric. This must be finalized and signed off on before any proposals are seen.

- The communication protocol, which strictly forbids any out-of-process communication about the proposals among evaluators.

- The schedule and logistics for each stage of the evaluation.

</li>
- 
**Stage 1 Execution The Blind Technical Review** ▴ 

<li>**Proposal Redaction** ▴ The procurement lead or facilitator receives all proposals. They are responsible for redacting all pricing information and, if possible, any identifying vendor information from the copies distributed to the evaluation committee. Each proposal is assigned a random identifier (e.g. Proposal A, Proposal B).

- **Independent Initial Scoring** ▴ Each evaluator individually reviews and scores every proposal using the pre-defined rubric. They must provide a written justification, citing specific page and section numbers from the proposal, for every score they assign. This is a solitary activity to prevent initial impressions from being influenced by others.

- **Facilitated Consensus Meeting** ▴ The facilitator leads a series of meetings, one for each criterion. They reveal the evaluators’ scores for that single criterion anonymously. If there is significant variance, the facilitator moderates a debate. Evaluators must defend their scores using the evidence they documented. The goal is to reach a consensus score for each proposal on that criterion. This process is repeated for all criteria until a final, consolidated [technical score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is achieved for each proposal.

</li>
- 
**Stage 2 Execution The Value-for-Money Calculation** ▴ 

<li>**The Price Reveal** ▴ Only after all technical scores are finalized and documented does the facilitator reveal the prices for each proposal.

- **Applying the Formula** ▴ A pre-agreed formula is used to combine the technical score and the price into a final score. A common approach is a value-point system, where the price is converted into points. For example, the lowest-priced bid receives the maximum price points, and other bids receive a score inversely proportional to their price. This score is then added to the weighted technical score.

- **Final Ranking** ▴ The proposals are ranked based on their final combined score. This ranking forms the primary basis for the selection decision.

</li>

![Intersecting angular structures symbolize dynamic market microstructure, multi-leg spread strategies. Translucent spheres represent institutional liquidity blocks, digital asset derivatives, precisely balanced](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-4.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The core of a disciplined execution is the use of a quantitative model to structure the evaluation. This transforms subjective impressions into a defensible, data-driven framework. The following table illustrates a sample weighted scoring model.

| Evaluation Category | Criterion | Weight (%) | Proposal A Score (1-5) | Proposal A Weighted Score | Proposal B Score (1-5) | Proposal B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (40%) | Alignment with Requirements | 20% | 4 | 0.80 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Project Management (30%) | Implementation Plan & Timeline | 20% | 4 | 0.80 | 3 | 0.60 |
| Team & Experience (30%) | Key Personnel Qualifications | 15% | 3 | 0.45 | 5 | 0.75 |

In this model, the weighted score for each criterion is calculated as (Weight Score). The total technical score is the sum of these weighted scores. Here, Proposal B has a superior technical score (4.05) compared to Proposal A (3.70). This calculation, completed before seeing the price, provides a solid, evidence-based foundation for the final step of the evaluation.

![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

Consider a scenario where a company is evaluating two proposals for a critical software system. Proposal A is from “[Legacy Systems](https://prime.greeks.live/area/legacy-systems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” a well-known incumbent vendor. Proposal B is from “Innovate Corp,” a smaller, more agile firm. In a standard single-stage RFP, the committee sees everything at once ▴ Legacy Systems’ price is $1.2M, and Innovate Corp’s is $1.5M.

Immediately, the $1.2M price becomes an anchor. One senior evaluator, who has worked with Legacy Systems for years, remarks, “They’ve always been a reliable partner.” This triggers confirmation bias and the availability heuristic. The team begins to scrutinize Innovate Corp’s proposal for risks to justify the price difference, exhibiting the horns effect. They might downplay Innovate’s superior technical architecture, focusing instead on their smaller size as a potential risk.

Legacy Systems’ adequate but uninspired solution gets the benefit of the doubt due to the lower price and familiarity ▴ a classic case of the lower-bid bias and halo effect. The final decision is to select Legacy Systems, a choice that feels safe and fiscally responsible.

Now, let’s replay this with the bias-resistant playbook. The committee first receives the technical proposals, anonymized as “Proposal A” (Legacy) and “Proposal B” (Innovate). Without the anchor of price or brand names, they engage with the substance. Using the quantitative rubric, they score Proposal B higher on technical architecture and scalability.

They note that Proposal A’s security plan is robust, but its implementation timeline is less detailed. The final, locked-in technical scores are 3.70 for A and 4.05 for B. Only then are the names and prices revealed. The facilitator applies the value formula. Even though Innovate Corp’s solution is more expensive, its significantly higher technical score results in a superior value-for-money rating.

The conversation is now framed not around “Is the cheaper option good enough?” but “Is the superior technical solution worth the 25% price premium?” The data-driven process forces a more strategic discussion about long-term value over short-term cost, leading to a decision to award the contract to Innovate Corp. The structured execution did not remove judgment; it elevated it, ensuring the final choice was based on a transparent and defensible analysis of value.

![A sleek, light interface, a Principal's Prime RFQ, overlays a dark, intricate market microstructure. This represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, showcasing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-system.jpg)

## References

- Dekel, Omer, and Amos Schurr. “Cognitive Biases in Government Procurement ▴ An Experimental Study.” _Review of Law & Economics_, vol. 10, no. 2, 2014, pp. 169-200.

- Gleb, Gleb. “How to Establish a Bias-Free Procurement Process.” _Disaster Avoidance Experts_, 15 Nov. 2022.

- Gleb, Gleb. “The Danger Of Bias In Bid Procurements And Contract Awards.” _Forbes_, 7 Dec. 2022.

- “Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Proposal Evaluation to Reduce Procurement Protest.” _National Contract Management Association_, 2021.

- Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under Uncertainty ▴ Heuristics and Biases.” _Science_, vol. 185, no. 4157, 1974, pp. 1124-1131.

![A precision mechanism with a central circular core and a linear element extending to a sharp tip, encased in translucent material. This symbolizes an institutional RFQ protocol's market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

The architecture of a decision is as important as the decision itself. The frameworks and protocols detailed here are not bureaucratic hurdles; they are the essential components of a high-fidelity decision-making system. By understanding the inherent vulnerabilities of human cognition, an organization can engineer a process that channels judgment away from distorting shortcuts and toward evidence-based analysis. The true measure of an evaluation system is its resilience under pressure ▴ its ability to produce a rational outcome when confronted with the powerful allure of familiarity, reputation, and a compelling price tag.

The ultimate goal is to construct a system where the best solution wins not by chance, but by design. What vulnerabilities exist in your current evaluation architecture, and what is the operational cost of leaving them unaddressed?

![A metallic, modular trading interface with black and grey circular elements, signifying distinct market microstructure components and liquidity pools. A precise, blue-cored probe diagonally integrates, representing an advanced RFQ engine for granular price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies in institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-price-discovery.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/anchoring-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Anchoring Bias

Meaning ▴ Anchoring Bias, within the sophisticated landscape of crypto institutional investing and smart trading, represents a cognitive heuristic where decision-makers disproportionately rely on an initial piece of information ▴ the "anchor" ▴ when evaluating subsequent data or making judgments about digital asset valuations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

## Confirmation Bias

Meaning ▴ Confirmation bias, within the context of crypto investing and smart trading, describes the cognitive predisposition of individuals or even algorithmic models to seek, interpret, favor, and recall information in a manner that affirms their pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses, while disproportionately dismissing contradictory evidence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation is the systematic and objective process of assessing and comparing the proposals submitted by various vendors in response to a Request for Proposal, with the ultimate goal of identifying the most suitable solution or service provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/availability-heuristic/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Availability Heuristic

Meaning ▴ The Availability Heuristic refers to a cognitive bias where individuals assess the probability or frequency of an event based on how readily examples or instances come to mind. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Halo Effect

Meaning ▴ In the context of crypto investing and institutional trading, the Halo Effect describes a cognitive bias where an investor's or market participant's overall positive impression of a particular cryptocurrency, project, or blockchain technology disproportionately influences their perception of its unrelated attributes or associated entities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-biases/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An intricate, transparent digital asset derivatives engine visualizes market microstructure and liquidity pool dynamics. Its precise components signify high-fidelity execution via FIX Protocol, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread strategies within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-ecosystem.jpg)

## Cognitive Biases

Meaning ▴ Cognitive biases are systematic deviations from rational judgment, inherently influencing human decision-making processes by distorting perceptions, interpretations, and recollections of information. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/single-stage-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central concentric ring structure, representing a Prime RFQ hub, processes RFQ protocols. Radiating translucent geometric shapes, symbolizing block trades and multi-leg spreads, illustrate liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-4.jpg)

## Single-Stage Rfp

Meaning ▴ A Single-Stage RFP (Request for Proposal) represents a procurement methodology where potential vendors submit one comprehensive, final proposal in response to a detailed solicitation, without subsequent rounds of revisions or negotiations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee, in the context of institutional crypto investing, particularly for large-scale procurement of trading services, technology solutions, or strategic partnerships, refers to a designated group of experts responsible for assessing proposals and making recommendations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Brushed metallic and colored modular components represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. The precise engineering signifies high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency within a sophisticated market microstructure for multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Risk Mitigation

Meaning ▴ Risk Mitigation, within the intricate systems architecture of crypto investing and trading, encompasses the systematic strategies and processes designed to reduce the probability or impact of identified risks to an acceptable level. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A layered, spherical structure reveals an inner metallic ring with intricate patterns, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocol logic. A central teal dome represents a deep liquidity pool and precise price discovery, encased within robust institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-orchestrating-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-multi-asset-liquidity.jpg)

## Technical Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/legacy-systems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, precision-engineered core system, with metallic rings and an active segment, represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent, faceted shaft symbolizes high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, real-time price discovery, and atomic settlement, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Legacy Systems

Meaning ▴ Legacy Systems, in the architectural context of institutional engagement with crypto and blockchain technology, refer to existing, often outdated, information technology infrastructures, applications, and processes within traditional financial institutions. </a>

**Tags:** [Availability Heuristic](https://options.greeks.live/area/availability-heuristic/), [Single-Stage RFP](https://options.greeks.live/area/single-stage-rfp/), [Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/), [Structured Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/structured-evaluation/), [Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/decision-making/), [Halo Effect](https://options.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can You Mitigate Cognitive Bias during the Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-mitigate-cognitive-bias-during-the-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![Two high-gloss, white cylindrical execution channels with dark, circular apertures and secure bolted flanges, representing robust institutional-grade infrastructure for digital asset derivatives. These conduits facilitate precise RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution within a proprietary Prime RFQ environment.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-execution-channels-enabling-private-quotation-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-on-prime-os.jpg)

A structured evaluation framework with quantitative scoring and consensus protocols mitigates cognitive bias for defensible, optimal RFP outcomes.

- 
### [How Do You Mitigate Personal Bias in an RFP Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-mitigate-personal-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![A crystalline geometric structure, symbolizing precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution, rests upon an intricate market microstructure framework. This visual metaphor illustrates the Prime RFQ facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, including Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, through RFQ protocols for block trades with minimal slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Mitigating RFP evaluation bias requires engineering a structured, data-driven protocol that neutralizes subjective judgment.

- 
### [How Should SLTOs Be Weighted When Evaluating Competing Vendor Proposals in an RFP Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-sltos-be-weighted-when-evaluating-competing-vendor-proposals-in-an-rfp-process/)
![Smooth, layered surfaces represent a Prime RFQ Protocol architecture for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. They symbolize integrated Liquidity Pool aggregation and optimized Market Microstructure. Two spheres illustrate Atomic Settlement of a Multi-Leg Spread, reflecting High-Fidelity Execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/market-microstructure-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

Weighting SLTOs translates strategic intent into a quantitative, risk-managed framework for defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [How Can You Effectively Mitigate Personal Bias within an Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-effectively-mitigate-personal-bias-within-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![Parallel marked channels depict granular market microstructure across diverse institutional liquidity pools. A glowing cyan ring highlights an active Request for Quote RFQ for precise price discovery. A metallic probe signifies an algorithmic trading engine performing high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-3.jpg)

Engineer a bias-resistant evaluation architecture using structured criteria, independent scoring, and price-blind reviews.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Scores?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-scores/)
![A beige, triangular device with a dark, reflective display and dual front apertures. This specialized hardware facilitates institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution, market microstructure analysis, optimal price discovery, capital efficiency, block trades, and portfolio margin.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-terminal-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-precise-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

Cognitive biases systematically distort RFP evaluations by substituting objective analysis with subconscious mental shortcuts.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Cognitive Biases a Facilitator Must Mitigate in an RFP Review?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-cognitive-biases-a-facilitator-must-mitigate-in-an-rfp-review/)
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

A facilitator's primary role is to architect an evidence-based evaluation system that neutralizes predictable cognitive shortcuts.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Train an Rfp Evaluation Committee on Cognitive Biases?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-train-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-on-cognitive-biases/)
![A precise geometric prism reflects on a dark, structured surface, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This visualizes block trade execution and price discovery for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-precision-execution.jpg)

A structured training program is the most effective method, transforming the committee into a calibrated system for objective, data-driven procurement decisions.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluations/)
![An abstract composition featuring two overlapping digital asset liquidity pools, intersected by angular structures representing multi-leg RFQ protocols. This visualizes dynamic price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and aggregated liquidity within institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-aggregated-liquidity-and-multi-leg-execution-via-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

Cognitive biases in RFP evaluations are systemic mental shortcuts that can be mitigated by architecting a two-stage, data-driven process.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Train an Rfp Evaluation Committee to Minimize Bias?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-train-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-to-minimize-bias/)
![Sleek metallic system component with intersecting translucent fins, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and gamma exposure for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols.jpg)

A resilient RFP evaluation system is architected through structured, data-driven protocols that systematically neutralize cognitive bias.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases in a Single Stage Rfp Evaluation?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-in-a-single-stage-rfp-evaluation/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-in-a-single-stage-rfp-evaluation/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases in a Single Stage Rfp Evaluation? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The most common cognitive biases in a single-stage RFP evaluation are anchoring, confirmation, and halo effects, which distort perceived value. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-in-a-single-stage-rfp-evaluation/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T06:42:26+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-27T16:21:02+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg",
        "caption": "Intricate light and dark geometric planes converge on a central, multi-faceted core. This abstract architecture visualizes an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, engineered for high-fidelity execution of block trades and multi-leg spreads in digital asset derivatives. It optimizes market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency, integrating liquidity pools and market makers within a Prime RFQ. The system facilitates algorithmic trading and portfolio margin for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, ensuring atomic settlement and best execution."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Anchoring Bias",
        "Availability Heuristic",
        "Behavioral Economics",
        "Cognitive Biases",
        "Confirmation Bias",
        "Decision Making",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Halo Effect",
        "Legacy Systems",
        "Lower Bid Bias",
        "Procurement Process",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "Risk Mitigation",
        "Single-Stage RFP",
        "Structured Evaluation",
        "Vendor Selection"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-in-a-single-stage-rfp-evaluation/
