# What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Committees? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Two distinct, polished spherical halves, beige and teal, reveal intricate internal market microstructure, connected by a central metallic shaft. This embodies an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across disparate liquidity pools for principal block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os.jpg)

![Abstract spheres and a translucent flow visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. It depicts robust RFQ protocol execution, high-fidelity data flow, and seamless liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement-across-prime-os.jpg)

## Concept

The architecture of a Request for Proposal (RFP) evaluation is designed to project objectivity. It possesses a structured framework, defined criteria, and a committee of professionals, all intended to produce a rational, defensible, and optimal procurement decision. Yet, this very structure can become a hothouse for [cognitive biases](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-cognitive-biases-distort-opportunity-cost-calculations-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), systemic deviations in judgment that warp outcomes in predictable ways.

The human mind, the core processing unit of any evaluation, operates using heuristics ▴ mental shortcuts that are efficient but often flawed. In the high-stakes, information-dense environment of an RFP review, these shortcuts manifest as biases that can silently dismantle even the most meticulously designed [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

Understanding these cognitive patterns is the foundational step toward building a more resilient [decision-making framework](https://prime.greeks.live/area/decision-making-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). These are not character flaws or failures of intellect on the part of committee members. Rather, they are intrinsic features of human cognition. The challenge lies in the reality that the RFP process itself, with its blend of quantitative data (pricing) and qualitative assessments (technical solutions, team expertise), creates fertile ground for these biases to take root.

The introduction of a low bid, for instance, can trigger an anchoring effect that colors the perception of all other proposal elements. A well-presented but substantively weak proposal might benefit from a [halo effect](https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), where positive feelings about one aspect unduly influence the assessment of others.

> A committee’s confidence in its own objectivity often obscures the systemic cognitive errors that are actively shaping its conclusions.

The group dynamic of a committee introduces another layer of complexity. Individual biases do not simply aggregate; they interact, creating compound effects. Social pressures lead to phenomena like [groupthink](https://prime.greeks.live/area/groupthink/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) or [authority bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/authority-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), where the stated preference of a senior or highly respected member can disproportionately sway the group’s consensus, overriding the independent analysis of other members. This transforms the committee from a diverse panel of experts into an echo chamber, validating a single viewpoint rather than stress-testing multiple perspectives.

The illusion of collaborative consensus masks a reality of cognitive conformity. Therefore, addressing bias in RFP evaluations requires a systemic approach, one that redesigns the evaluation architecture to insulate it from the predictable vulnerabilities of human psychology.

![Two distinct components, beige and green, are securely joined by a polished blue metallic element. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimal liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-link.jpg)

![A sleek, dark reflective sphere is precisely intersected by two flat, light-toned blades, creating an intricate cross-sectional design. This visually represents institutional digital asset derivatives' market microstructure, where RFQ protocols enable high-fidelity execution and price discovery within dark liquidity pools, ensuring capital efficiency and managing counterparty risk via advanced Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Systemic Flaws in Human Judgment

Strategically neutralizing cognitive biases requires their precise identification and a deep understanding of their mechanisms. In the context of RFP evaluations, biases are not random noise; they are specific, predictable system errors. A primary function of a robust evaluation strategy is to deconstruct the process into components that can be analyzed for these specific failure points. The most pervasive biases can be grouped into categories based on how they distort the processing of information and the dynamics of group decision-making.

Information processing biases are fundamental and often the most difficult to counteract because they feel intuitive. They operate at the level of individual assessment, before any group discussion begins. These biases fundamentally alter how a reviewer perceives and weighs the data presented in a proposal.

- **[Anchoring Bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/anchoring-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** This is the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the “anchor”) when making decisions. In an RFP context, the most common anchor is price. A low bid can create a powerful cognitive anchor, causing evaluators to subconsciously view the associated technical proposal more favorably, a phenomenon sometimes called the “lower-bid bias.” Conversely, a high price can create a negative anchor that is difficult to overcome, even with a superior technical solution. 

- **[Confirmation Bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** This is the natural human tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one’s preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. If an evaluator has a positive prior impression of a vendor, they will subconsciously look for evidence in the RFP response that validates that impression, while downplaying or ignoring red flags. This defeats the purpose of an objective, evidence-based evaluation. 

- **Availability Heuristic** Evaluators often judge the likelihood of an event by how easily examples of it come to mind. A vendor recently in the news for a successful project might be perceived as more competent, while a vendor associated with a recent, high-profile failure (even if unrelated to the current scope) may be unfairly penalized. The evaluation becomes a judgment based on memorable anecdotes rather than the specific merits of the proposal. 

- **Halo and Horns Effect** This bias occurs when an initial positive impression (halo) or negative impression (horns) about one aspect of a proposal disproportionately influences the evaluation of all other aspects. A beautifully designed, well-written proposal document (halo) might lead evaluators to be less critical of its technical substance. A single grammatical error or a poorly formatted section (horns) might create a negative impression that unfairly taints the perception of the entire solution. 

> The structure of the evaluation itself, particularly the simultaneous assessment of price and quality, is a primary catalyst for bias.

![An abstract composition featuring two overlapping digital asset liquidity pools, intersected by angular structures representing multi-leg RFQ protocols. This visualizes dynamic price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and aggregated liquidity within institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-aggregated-liquidity-and-multi-leg-execution-via-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Group Dynamics and Social Biases

When individual evaluators convene as a committee, a new set of social biases comes into play. These biases arise from the interactions between members and can amplify or even override individual cognitive errors. A strategy that fails to account for group dynamics is incomplete.

### Social Biases in Committee Settings

| Bias | Mechanism | Impact on RFP Evaluation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Authority Bias | A tendency to attribute greater accuracy and influence to the opinion of an authority figure. | The comments of a senior executive or a highly respected technical expert on the committee can silence dissenting opinions, leading to premature consensus and insufficient debate. |
| Bandwagon Effect / Groupthink | The tendency for individuals to adopt a certain behavior or belief because many others are doing so. | As a particular vendor gains momentum in the discussion, other evaluators may suppress their own doubts to align with the perceived group consensus, leading to a less rigorous final decision. |
| Status Quo Bias | A preference for the current state of affairs, where any change from that baseline is perceived as a loss. | This bias creates an inherent advantage for incumbent vendors. The perceived risks of switching to a new, innovative solution often outweigh its potential benefits, stifling progress and competition. |

A successful strategy involves designing the evaluation process to mitigate these forces. This includes procedural safeguards, such as blinding evaluators to certain information (like price or vendor identity) during initial scoring, and structuring committee discussions to ensure all voices are heard. The goal is to create an environment where proposals are judged on their intrinsic merits, insulated from the distorting effects of both individual cognitive shortcuts and group social pressures.

![Modular circuit panels, two with teal traces, converge around a central metallic anchor. This symbolizes core architecture for institutional digital asset derivatives, representing a Principal's Prime RFQ framework, enabling high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-prime-os.jpg)

![Two sleek, pointed objects intersect centrally, forming an 'X' against a dual-tone black and teal background. This embodies the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating optimal price discovery and efficient cross-asset trading within a robust Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

Transitioning from a theoretical understanding of cognitive biases to their practical neutralization requires a disciplined, architectural approach to the [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process. This is not about asking committee members to “try to be less biased.” It is about building a system of evaluation ▴ a procedural and technological framework ▴ that structurally minimizes the opportunities for bias to exert influence. This operational playbook is designed to be implemented as a complete system.

![An abstract composition featuring two intersecting, elongated objects, beige and teal, against a dark backdrop with a subtle grey circular element. This visualizes RFQ Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Multi-Leg Spread Block Trades within a Prime Brokerage Crypto Derivatives OS for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-options-rfq-for-multi-leg-spreads-price-discovery.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook a Step by Step Mitigation Guide

This playbook provides a sequential, actionable guide to redesigning the evaluation process. Each step is a control measure designed to counter specific, identified biases.

- **Pre-Mortem Analysis and Deal-Breaker Definition** Before the RFP is even released, the committee should convene for a “pre-mortem.” They should imagine the project has failed and brainstorm all the potential reasons why. This exercise helps identify key risks and establishes a clear, pre-defined list of “deal-breakers” or mandatory criteria. This list, created before any proposals are seen, serves as an objective filter, countering the confirmation and belief biases that might arise later. 

- **Structured, Decomposed Scoring Rubric** The evaluation criteria must be broken down into their smallest defensible components. Instead of a single score for “Technical Solution,” create sub-scores for “Scalability,” “Security Protocols,” “Integration APIs,” and “User Interface.” Each criterion should have a clear, descriptive scale (e.g. 1=Fails to Meet Requirement, 3=Meets Requirement, 5=Exceeds Requirement with Demonstrable Value). This granularity forces a detailed analysis and makes it harder for the halo effect from one positive area to bleed over into others. 

- **[Two-Stage Evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Protocol** This is one of the most powerful structural changes to combat anchoring from price.

<li> **Stage 1 Technical Evaluation (Blinded)** The evaluation committee first receives and scores the technical proposals without any pricing information. Ideally, the proposals are also anonymized, with vendor names and branding removed, to eliminate biases related to reputation or past experience (availability heuristic). All scoring is completed and locked in. 

- **Stage 2 Price and Financial Evaluation** Only after the technical scoring is finalized is the pricing information revealed. The committee can then evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the technically qualified proposals. This sequence ensures that the perception of quality is not distorted by the anchor of price. 

</li>
- **Independent Scoring Followed by Moderated Discussion** Each evaluator must complete their scoring rubric independently, without consulting other committee members. This prevents the initial thoughts of one person from anchoring the entire group. Once all independent scores are submitted, a moderator facilitates a discussion, focusing only on areas with high variance in scores. This approach ensures that the discussion is targeted and prevents groupthink from dominating the entire evaluation. 

- **Appointment of a “Devil’s Advocate” or Decision Observer** Designate one member of the committee to actively challenge the emerging consensus. Their role is to question assumptions, point out potential instances of bias, and force the team to justify its conclusions based on the evidence in the proposals. This formalizes dissent and makes it a required part of the process, providing a powerful antidote to groupthink and the bandwagon effect. 

![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

Data analysis can be a powerful tool for revealing and controlling for bias. By structuring the evaluation data correctly, it becomes possible to run diagnostics that check for the tell-tale signs of cognitive errors.

Consider the following table, which simulates the scoring of three vendors. In a typical, unstructured process, the low price of Vendor C acts as an anchor, subtly inflating its technical scores. In the two-stage model, the technical scores are locked in before price is known, leading to a different, more objective outcome.

### Impact of Two-Stage Evaluation on Scoring

| Vendor | Evaluation Model | Technical Score (out of 70) | Price (out of 30) | Total Score (out of 100) | Outcome |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor A | Single-Stage (Price Known) | 62 | 20 | 82 | Loses |
| Vendor B | Single-Stage (Price Known) | 55 | 25 | 80 | Loses |
| Vendor C | Single-Stage (Price Known) | 58 | 30 | 88 | Wins |

In this model, the “Price Score” is calculated inversely based on cost. Vendor C’s low bid gives it a perfect 30. In the single-stage model, this powerful anchor pulls its technical score up to 58, making it the winner. However, in the two-stage model, the unbiased technical score for Vendor A is 65.

Even with a lower price score, its superior technical merit, evaluated objectively, allows it to win. This quantitative discipline enforces the strategic goal.

![A diagonal metallic framework supports two dark circular elements with blue rims, connected by a central oval interface. This represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, facilitating block trade execution, high-fidelity execution, dark liquidity, and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study in Bias

Imagine a mid-sized company evaluating proposals for a new CRM system. The committee consists of the Head of Sales, the CFO, and the IT Director. Vendor X is the well-known incumbent. Vendor Y is a smaller, innovative startup.

The Head of Sales enters the evaluation with a strong preference for Vendor X. He has worked with them for years and finds their system familiar. This is the **[Status Quo Bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/status-quo-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)**. During the review, he focuses on sections of Vendor Y’s proposal that discuss data migration challenges, interpreting them as major risks, a clear case of **Confirmation Bias**. He dismisses their innovative features as “unproven.”

The CFO sees Vendor Y’s significantly lower price and it becomes his **Anchor**. He starts to view their proposal more favorably, arguing that their “lean” approach is more efficient. He subconsciously over-values their financial stability report while downplaying the technical risks the IT director points out. This is the **Halo Effect** stemming from the low price.

The IT Director is impressed by the modern architecture of Vendor Y’s solution. However, the Head of Sales is a more senior and forceful personality. In the main evaluation meeting, the Head of Sales speaks first and frames the decision as “proven reliability vs. unnecessary risk.” This triggers **Authority Bias**. The IT Director, though possessing superior technical knowledge, softens his stance to avoid conflict, a hallmark of **Groupthink**.

The committee selects the incumbent, Vendor X, not based on a balanced evaluation of merit, but as a result of a cascade of interacting cognitive biases. The final report cites “reliability” and “[risk mitigation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” as the rationale, creating an illusion of objectivity that conceals the deeply flawed process.

Had the committee used the operational playbook, the outcome would have been different. A two-stage evaluation would have forced an objective assessment of Vendor Y’s superior technology without the distorting effect of its low price. Independent scoring and a designated devil’s advocate would have given the IT Director’s technical assessment more weight and prevented the Head of Sales’ authority from dominating the discussion. The final decision would have been a conscious, strategic choice between two valid options, rather than a foregone conclusion driven by cognitive shortcuts.

![A textured spherical digital asset, resembling a lunar body with a central glowing aperture, is bisected by two intersecting, planar liquidity streams. This depicts institutional RFQ protocol, optimizing block trade execution, price discovery, and multi-leg options strategies with high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-optimized-rfq-execution-protocol-dynamic-liquidity-management.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

Modern procurement software can be configured to serve as a technological bulwark against bias. The system’s architecture can enforce the procedural rules outlined in the playbook.

- **Access Control and Blinding** The system can be configured to release proposal sections in stages. Technical evaluators can be given access only to the technical volumes, with vendor names and pricing information programmatically redacted. This automates the blinding process, ensuring compliance. 

- **Structured Data Input** Instead of allowing for free-form text comments, which are prone to narrative and emotional language, the system should require evaluators to enter scores directly into the granular rubric. Comments should be tied to specific criteria, forcing a more disciplined and evidence-based approach. 

- **Deviation Analysis Dashboards** Once independent scores are submitted, the system can automatically generate a dashboard that visualizes the degree of variance for each criterion. This allows the moderator to instantly identify the most contentious points for discussion, making meetings more efficient and data-driven. 

- **Audit Trails** The system should maintain an immutable log of all evaluation activities. This includes who accessed what information, when scores were entered, and any changes made. This creates a high degree of accountability and allows for post-decision audits to review the integrity of the evaluation process. 

By embedding the principles of bias mitigation into the very architecture of the procurement technology, an organization moves from relying on individual discipline to enforcing systemic integrity. The technology becomes an active participant in ensuring a rational, objective, and ultimately more effective RFP evaluation process.

![A large textured blue sphere anchors two glossy cream and teal spheres. Intersecting cream and blue bars precisely meet at a gold cylinder, symbolizing an RFQ Price Discovery mechanism](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-and-multi-leg-execution.jpg)

## References

- Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory ▴ An Analysis of Decision under Risk. _Econometrica_, 47(2), 263 ▴ 291.

- Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty ▴ Heuristics and Biases. _Science_, 185(4157), 1124 ▴ 1131.

- Dekel, O. & Schurr, A. (2014). Cognitive Biases in Government Procurement ▴ An Experimental Study. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

- Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. _Journal of Risk and Uncertainty_, 1(1), 7 ▴ 59.

- Flyvbjerg, B. (2008). Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning ▴ Reference Class Forecasting in Practice. _European Planning Studies_, 16(1), 3-21.

- Bazerman, M. H. & Moore, D. A. (2012). _Judgment in Managerial Decision Making_ (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

- Harvey, C. R. (2017). The Proliferation of Factors and the Future of Active Investing. _The Journal of Portfolio Management_, 43(5), 1-4. 

- Nowlis, S. M. & Simonson, I. (1997). Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals. _Journal of Marketing Research_, 34(2), 205-218.

![Reflective and circuit-patterned metallic discs symbolize the Prime RFQ powering institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts deep market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution through RFQ protocols, precise price discovery, and robust algorithmic trading within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-architecture-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-liquidity-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

![Two semi-transparent, curved elements, one blueish, one greenish, are centrally connected, symbolizing dynamic institutional RFQ protocols. This configuration suggests aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread constructions](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-engine.jpg)

## A System of Continuous Improvement

The neutralization of [cognitive bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is not a state to be achieved, but a process to be maintained. The frameworks and protocols detailed here provide a robust architecture for rational decision-making, yet the human element remains central. The true advancement lies in recognizing that an evaluation system’s integrity is a dynamic variable, requiring constant monitoring and refinement. Each RFP cycle is a data point, an opportunity to analyze the effectiveness of the implemented controls and to identify new, more subtle vulnerabilities.

This perspective shifts the goal from conducting a “perfect” evaluation to building an organization that is perpetually improving its decision-making capabilities. The value is found in the discipline of the process itself. By embedding these principles into the operational fabric of procurement, an organization cultivates a culture of critical thinking and intellectual honesty.

The ultimate strategic advantage is not derived from any single correct decision, but from the cumulative effect of making consistently better, more defensible choices over time. The system becomes a learning mechanism, adapting and evolving to protect its most critical judgments from its most inherent flaws.

![Precision instruments, resembling calibration tools, intersect over a central geared mechanism. This metaphor illustrates the intricate market microstructure and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-analytics.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-cognitive-biases-distort-opportunity-cost-calculations-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered, multi-layered system component, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Two distinct probes represent RFQ protocols for price discovery and high-fidelity execution, integrating latent liquidity and pre-trade analytics within a robust Prime RFQ framework, ensuring best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Cognitive Biases

Cognitive biases systematically distort opportunity cost calculations by warping the perception of risk and reward. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional grade RFQ protocol nexus, where two principal trading system components converge. A central atomic settlement sphere glows with high-fidelity execution, symbolizing market microstructure optimization for digital asset derivatives via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

MiFID II mandates a data-driven, auditable RFQ process, transforming counterparty evaluation into a quantitative discipline to ensure best execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/decision-making-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central blue structural hub, emblematic of a robust Prime RFQ, extends four metallic and illuminated green arms. These represent diverse liquidity streams and multi-leg spread strategies for high-fidelity digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging advanced RFQ protocols for optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## Decision-Making Framework

Meaning ▴ A Decision-Making Framework represents a codified, systematic methodology designed to process inputs and generate optimal outputs for complex financial operations within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, two-tone devices precisely stacked on a stable base represent an institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. This embodies layered RFQ protocols, enabling multi-leg spread execution and liquidity aggregation within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution, optimizing counterparty risk and market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-architecture.jpg)

## Halo Effect

Meaning ▴ The Halo Effect is defined as a cognitive bias where the perception of a single positive attribute of an entity or asset disproportionately influences the generalized assessment of its other, unrelated attributes, leading to an overall favorable valuation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/authority-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sharp, intersecting elements, two light, two teal, on a reflective disc, centered by a precise mechanism. This visualizes institutional liquidity convergence for multi-leg options strategies in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Authority Bias

Meaning ▴ Authority Bias is a cognitive heuristic where individuals assign disproportionate credibility and influence to information or directives originating from perceived authority figures, irrespective of the intrinsic merit or empirical validation of the content. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/groupthink/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely engineered abstract structure featuring translucent and opaque blades converging at a central hub. This embodies institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, representing dynamic liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and complex multi-leg spread price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-multi-leg-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Groupthink

Meaning ▴ Groupthink defines a cognitive bias where the desire for conformity within a decision-making group suppresses independent critical thought, leading to suboptimal or irrational outcomes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/anchoring-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interconnected, sharp-edged geometric prisms on a dark surface reflect complex light. This embodies the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating RFQ protocol aggregation for block trade execution, price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework enabling optimal liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-geometric-prisms-reflecting-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-optimized-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Anchoring Bias

Meaning ▴ Anchoring bias is a cognitive heuristic where an individual's quantitative judgment is disproportionately influenced by an initial piece of information, even if that information is irrelevant or arbitrary. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Confirmation Bias

Meaning ▴ Confirmation Bias represents the cognitive tendency to seek, interpret, favor, and recall information in a manner that confirms one's pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses, often disregarding contradictory evidence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two robust modules, a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, connect via a central RFQ protocol mechanism. This system enables high-fidelity execution, price discovery, atomic settlement for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-engine.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A teal and white sphere precariously balanced on a light grey bar, itself resting on an angular base, depicts market microstructure at a critical price discovery point. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency and risk aggregation within a Principal trading desk's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-strategy.jpg)

## Two-Stage Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Two-Stage Evaluation refers to a structured analytical process designed to optimize resource allocation by applying sequential filters to a dataset or set of opportunities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/status-quo-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central blue-grey modular components precisely interconnect, flanked by two off-white units. This visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol hub, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-interconnect-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Status Quo Bias

Meaning ▴ Status Quo Bias defines a cognitive tendency for decision-makers to prefer the current state of affairs, resisting change even when a rational analysis indicates a superior alternative exists. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp, crystalline spearhead symbolizes high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. Resting on a reflective surface, it evokes optimal liquidity aggregation within a sophisticated RFQ protocol environment, reflecting complex market microstructure and advanced algorithmic trading strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution.jpg)

## Risk Mitigation

Meaning ▴ Risk Mitigation involves the systematic application of controls and strategies designed to reduce the probability or impact of adverse events on a system's operational integrity or financial performance. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sharp, teal, blade-like forms crossed, featuring circular inserts, resting on stacked, darker, elongated elements. This represents intersecting RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating multi-leg spread construction and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-best-execution.jpg)

## Cognitive Bias

Meaning ▴ Cognitive bias represents a systematic deviation from rational judgment in decision-making, originating from inherent heuristics or mental shortcuts. </a>

**Tags:** [Cognitive Bias](https://options.greeks.live/area/cognitive-bias/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [Groupthink](https://options.greeks.live/area/groupthink/), [Behavioral Economics](https://options.greeks.live/area/behavioral-economics/), [Halo Effect](https://options.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does a Facilitator Address and Mitigate Cognitive Biases within an Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-facilitator-address-and-mitigate-cognitive-biases-within-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![A sophisticated mechanical system featuring a translucent, crystalline blade-like component, embodying a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, demonstrating aggregated inquiry and price discovery within market microstructure. It represents a principal's operational framework for capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-1.jpg)

A facilitator architects a structured evaluation system where procedural discipline neutralizes the impact of cognitive biases.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Train an Rfp Evaluation Committee on Cognitive Biases?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-train-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-on-cognitive-biases/)
![A precise geometric prism reflects on a dark, structured surface, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This visualizes block trade execution and price discovery for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-precision-execution.jpg)

A structured training program is the most effective method, transforming the committee into a calibrated system for objective, data-driven procurement decisions.

- 
### [What Is the Role of a Scoring Rubric in Reducing Evaluator Bias in an Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-scoring-rubric-in-reducing-evaluator-bias-in-an-rfp-process/)
![Beige module, dark data strip, teal reel, clear processing component. This illustrates an RFQ protocol's high-fidelity execution, facilitating principal-to-principal atomic settlement in market microstructure, essential for a Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

A scoring rubric is a systemic protocol that mitigates evaluator bias by structuring judgment and quantifying qualitative data.

- 
### [How Should the Weighting of Rfp Scoring Criteria Be Determined to Ensure Strategic Alignment?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-rfp-scoring-criteria-be-determined-to-ensure-strategic-alignment/)
![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface. This Prime RFQ enables optimal price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and multi-leg spread trading for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and systemic risk mitigation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Determining RFP scoring weights is the systematic translation of strategic priorities into a defensible, quantitative model for optimal vendor selection.

- 
### [How Does Blind Evaluation Improve the Fairness of a Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-blind-evaluation-improve-the-fairness-of-a-procurement-process/)
![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. Internal patterns symbolize market microstructure data streams, enabling algorithmic pricing and optimal price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Blind evaluation improves procurement fairness by architecting a system that isolates proposal merit from supplier identity, neutralizing bias.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Train an Rfp Evaluation Committee to Ensure Consistent Scoring?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-train-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-to-ensure-consistent-scoring/)
![A multi-layered device with translucent aqua dome and blue ring, on black. This represents an Institutional-Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for Digital Asset Derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution through optimized RFQ protocols, facilitating precise price discovery and leveraging deep market microstructure analysis for latent liquidity access.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

Training an RFP committee is the systemic calibration of human judgment to produce a consistent, data-driven procurement decision.

- 
### [How Does a Weighted Scoring Model Improve the RFP Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-model-improve-the-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives. A sharp component represents high-fidelity execution and liquidity provision, embodying Prime RFQ efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

A weighted scoring model improves RFP evaluations by architecting a data-driven, auditable system that translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable framework.

- 
### [How Does Groupthink Manifest in an Rfp Evaluation Committee and What Are the Strategies to Counter It?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-groupthink-manifest-in-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-and-what-are-the-strategies-to-counter-it/)
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools. Modular elements represent atomic settlement and capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

Groupthink in an RFP committee is a systemic failure of critical analysis; it is countered by architecting a decision process with protocols for dissent.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Ways to Mitigate Evaluator Bias during an Rfp Review?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-ways-to-mitigate-evaluator-bias-during-an-rfp-review/)
![A futuristic apparatus visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. A transparent sphere represents a private quotation or block trade, balanced on a teal Principal's operational framework, signifying capital efficiency within an RFQ protocol. The sharp upper blade implies price discovery and best execution across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

A resilient RFP evaluation system neutralizes cognitive bias through structured, data-driven protocols.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Committees?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-committees/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-committees/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Committees? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "RFP evaluation committees are prone to cognitive biases like anchoring and confirmation bias, which can be mitigated by a structured, two-stage evaluation process. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-committees/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T14:09:58+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T14:10:09+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-core.jpg",
        "caption": "Symmetrical internal system components, with light green circuit-like pathways and white structural elements converging at central blue connection points, visually metaphor a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS engineered for institutional trading. It highlights intricate market microstructure supporting robust RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads and complex digital asset derivatives. This design underscores optimal price discovery, efficient capital allocation, and mitigated counterparty risk."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Anchoring Bias",
        "Authority Bias",
        "Behavioral Economics",
        "Cognitive Bias",
        "Confirmation Bias",
        "Decision-Making Framework",
        "Groupthink",
        "Halo Effect",
        "Procurement Bias",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "Risk Mitigation",
        "Status Quo Bias",
        "Two-Stage Evaluation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-committees/
