# What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Scores? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, disc-shaped system, with concentric rings and a central dome, visually represents an advanced Principal's operational framework. It integrates RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and real-time risk management](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

![A sleek metallic teal execution engine, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS, interfaces with a luminous pre-trade analytics display. This abstract view depicts institutional RFQ protocols enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing market microstructure and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

## Concept

The request for proposal (RFP) process represents a foundational mechanism for objective procurement, a structured attempt to distill complex vendor offerings into a clear, comparable format. Yet, the very human minds tasked with executing this objective process are subject to systematic patterns of deviation from pure rationality. These are not random errors, but [cognitive biases](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-cognitive-biases-distort-opportunity-cost-calculations-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ▴ inherent mental shortcuts that can unconsciously warp the perception of value, risk, and competence.

The final evaluation score, intended as a data-driven conclusion, often becomes a document reflecting a series of subtle, unacknowledged judgments made long before the final numbers are tallied. Understanding these biases is the first principle of mastering the [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) system.

The core of the issue resides in the brain’s method for handling complexity. Faced with an avalanche of information ▴ technical specifications, qualitative narratives, pricing structures, and performance histories ▴ the mind defaults to heuristics. These mental shortcuts allow for efficient, rapid processing. An evaluator does not meticulously weigh every data point in isolation; instead, they construct a narrative.

A proposal from a familiar incumbent feels safer ([Status Quo Bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/status-quo-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)). A well-designed, visually appealing document suggests a competent organization (Halo Effect). The first price seen becomes the benchmark against which all others are judged (Anchoring Bias). These are not failures of character or expertise, but predictable artifacts of human cognition operating under pressure and information overload. The result is a systemic vulnerability within the [evaluation framework](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-evaluation-framework-adapt-for-high-frequency-versus-low-frequency-trading-strategies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), where the most deserving proposal may not always be the one that scores the highest.

![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## The Illusion of Objectivity

The very structure of an RFP, with its weighted criteria and numerical scoring, promotes a sense of empirical rigor. Evaluators fill out scorecards, numbers are entered into spreadsheets, and a winner is mathematically determined. This process creates a powerful illusion of objectivity. However, the numbers themselves are merely the output of a deeply subjective process.

Each score assigned to a qualitative criterion is a judgment call, and it is at this micro-level that cognitive biases exert their most profound influence. The final score is not an objective truth, but the culmination of dozens of small, biased judgments, laundered through the language of mathematics to appear impartial.

> The architecture of the RFP process, designed for impartiality, often conceals the inherent subjectivity of the evaluators operating within it.

This creates a significant operational risk. Decisions believed to be data-driven are, in fact, influenced by factors entirely unrelated to the proposal’s merits, such as the order in which proposals were reviewed or the reputation of the vendor’s CEO. The financial and strategic consequences of such skewed evaluations can be immense, leading to the selection of suboptimal partners, budget overruns, and project failures. The challenge, therefore, is to design an evaluation system that acknowledges and actively counteracts these inherent cognitive traps, reinforcing the structural integrity of the decision-making process itself.

![Glowing teal conduit symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and real-time market microstructure data flow for digital asset derivatives. Smooth grey spheres represent aggregated liquidity pools and robust counterparty risk management within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Strategy

Strategically addressing cognitive biases in RFP evaluations requires moving beyond simple awareness and implementing a framework that systematically identifies and neutralizes their effects. The goal is to architect a process where objective evidence is amplified and subjective intuition is scrutinized. This involves dissecting the evaluation workflow into its constituent parts and embedding [bias mitigation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/bias-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) techniques at each stage. The most common and impactful biases can be categorized and targeted with specific countermeasures.

![A sleek, multi-layered institutional crypto derivatives platform interface, featuring a transparent intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Buttons signify RFQ protocol initiation for block trades, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within a robust Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-precision-execution-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Deconstructing Common Evaluator Biases

A successful strategy begins with a granular understanding of the specific cognitive mechanisms at play during an evaluation. Each bias operates differently, and a one-size-fits-all solution is ineffective. A multi-pronged defensive strategy is necessary.

- **Anchoring and the Lower-Bid Bias** ▴ The first piece of information received, particularly a price, becomes a powerful anchor. A study by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem conclusively demonstrated the “[lower bid bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lower-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” where evaluators who see the price alongside qualitative factors systematically score the lowest bidder more favorably on non-price criteria. The low price creates a positive halo, subconsciously inflating the perception of the proposal’s overall quality. 

- **[Confirmation Bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This is the tendency to seek out and favor information that confirms pre-existing beliefs. If an evaluator has a positive prior relationship with a vendor, they will unconsciously look for evidence in the proposal that supports their positive opinion while downplaying any weaknesses. Conversely, a negative perception can lead them to focus disproportionately on flaws in a competitor’s submission. 

- **The Halo and Horns Effect** ▴ This bias occurs when a single positive (Halo) or negative (Horns) attribute of a proposal influences the evaluation of all other unrelated attributes. A slick, professionally designed proposal document can create a [halo effect](https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), leading evaluators to score the technical solution or project plan more highly than they otherwise would. A single grammatical error, conversely, might create a horns effect, unfairly coloring the perception of the entire proposal. 

- **Availability Heuristic and Recency Bias** ▴ Evaluators often give undue weight to information that is easily recalled. This can manifest as the availability heuristic, where a vendor associated with a recent, highly publicized success (or failure) is judged on that single event rather than their long-term track record. Recency bias is a specific form of this, where an evaluator’s most recent interaction with a vendor disproportionately influences their decision. 

![An abstract composition of interlocking, precisely engineered metallic plates represents a sophisticated institutional trading infrastructure. Visible perforations within a central block symbolize optimized data conduits for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-layer.jpg)

## Architecting a Bias-Resistant Evaluation Framework

Mitigating these biases requires a deliberate and structured approach. The following strategies form the pillars of a robust evaluation framework that promotes objectivity.

> A resilient evaluation strategy is one that forces a deliberate, evidence-based assessment over reflexive, intuitive judgment.

A key structural defense is the implementation of a multi-stage evaluation process. This is particularly effective against anchoring and the lower-bid bias. In a [two-stage evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the technical and qualitative components of a proposal are scored by the evaluation team before the pricing information is revealed.

This ensures that the assessment of quality is not contaminated by the powerful anchor of price. Only after the qualitative scores are finalized is the pricing envelope opened, allowing for a more rational price-to-quality comparison.

Another critical component is the use of highly structured and granular scoring rubrics. Vague scales like “1-3” or “Meets/Does Not Meet” provide fertile ground for bias. A detailed 5 or 10-point scale with clear, descriptive anchors for each score forces evaluators to justify their ratings with specific evidence from the proposal.

For example, instead of “Technical Solution,” a rubric might break this down into “Scalability,” “Security Protocols,” and “Integration Capabilities,” each with its own detailed scoring guide. This transforms the evaluation from a high-level impression into a series of specific, evidence-based assessments.

![A futuristic, intricate central mechanism with luminous blue accents represents a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives Price Discovery. Four sleek, curved panels extending outwards signify diverse Liquidity Pools and RFQ channels for Block Trade High-Fidelity Execution, minimizing Slippage and Latency in Market Microstructure operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-2.jpg)

![A polished metallic modular hub with four radiating arms represents an advanced RFQ execution engine. This system aggregates multi-venue liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across diverse counterparty risk profiles, powered by a sophisticated intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-rfq-hub-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Execution

The transition from a strategic understanding of [cognitive bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to its effective neutralization lies in the meticulous execution of an operational playbook. This playbook is not a set of loose guidelines but a codified system of procedures, data analysis protocols, and technological integrations designed to build resilience into the very fabric of the procurement process. It is about creating an environment where objectivity is the path of least resistance.

![Intricate core of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcasing precision platters symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and a high-fidelity execution arm. This depicts robust principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocol processing and market microstructure for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-execution-system.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Bias Mitigation

This playbook provides a sequential, actionable guide for procurement teams to follow from RFP issuance to final [vendor selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Each step is designed to preemptively address specific cognitive biases.

- **Pre-Evaluation Phase ▴ Sanitize the Environment**

<li>**Anonymize Submissions** ▴ Where possible, instruct vendors to submit proposals without company branding or identifying information in the main body of the document. Assign a random identifier to each submission. This directly counters the Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Status Quo Bias by forcing evaluators to assess the proposal on its merits alone.

- **Mandatory Bias Training** ▴ Before the evaluation period begins, all members of the selection committee must complete a short training session on the most common cognitive biases in procurement. This raises awareness and encourages self-monitoring during the evaluation process. 

- **Finalize the Scoring Rubric** ▴ The detailed, multi-point scoring rubric must be finalized and locked before any proposals are opened. This prevents any adjustments to the criteria after seeing the proposals, a potential manifestation of confirmation bias.

</li>
- **Evaluation Phase ▴ Enforce Structured Deliberation**

<li>**Independent Initial Scoring** ▴ Each evaluator must complete their initial scoring of all proposals independently, without consulting other team members. This prevents “groupthink” and the Authority Bias, where the opinion of a senior member can unduly influence the group.

- **Two-Stage Qualitative and Quantitative Review** ▴ Implement a strict two-stage review. The technical and qualitative sections are scored first. Only after these scores are submitted and locked are the pricing proposals distributed for evaluation. This is the most effective defense against the Lower-Bid Bias. 

- **Mandatory Score Justification** ▴ For each criterion, the scoring system should require evaluators to write a brief justification for their score, referencing specific sections of the proposal. This forces a shift from intuitive judgment to evidence-based analysis and provides a clear record for later review.

</li>
- **Post-Evaluation Phase ▴ Calibrate and Decide**

<li>**Calibration Meeting** ▴ After independent scoring is complete, the team meets to discuss the results. An independent facilitator should lead this meeting. The focus should be on proposals where there is high variance in scores between evaluators. Each evaluator explains their justification, allowing the team to challenge and recalibrate scores based on a shared understanding of the evidence.

- **Documentation and Protest Readiness** ▴ The entire process, including individual scores, justifications, and calibration meeting notes, must be meticulously documented. This not only ensures a fair and transparent process but also provides a robust defense in the event of a vendor protest. 

</li>

![Abstract geometric forms in muted beige, grey, and teal represent the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Sharp angles and depth symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery within RFQ protocols, highlighting capital efficiency and real-time risk management for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ platform](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-optimized-rfq-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

Data analysis serves as a powerful tool for revealing the hidden influence of bias. By modeling evaluation data, organizations can identify patterns that suggest a departure from objective scoring. The following tables illustrate how biases can manifest numerically.

![Abstract forms illustrate a Prime RFQ platform's intricate market microstructure. Transparent layers depict deep liquidity pools and RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-primeos.jpg)

## Table 1 ▴ The Impact of the Lower-Bid Bias

This table models a scenario where two vendors have identical qualitative strengths, but Vendor B has a lower price. In a biased evaluation, the knowledge of the lower price inflates Vendor B’s qualitative scores.

| Evaluation Criterion | Vendor A Score (Unbiased) | Vendor B Score (Unbiased) | Vendor B Score (Lower-Bid Bias) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (Weight ▴ 40%) | 8/10 | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Project Management (Weight ▴ 30%) | 9/10 | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Past Performance (Weight ▴ 30%) | 7/10 | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Weighted Qualitative Score | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.7 |

![Abstract planes illustrate RFQ protocol execution for multi-leg spreads. A dynamic teal element signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization.jpg)

## Table 2 ▴ The Halo Effect in Action

In this scenario, Vendor X has an exceptionally strong relationship with a key stakeholder (Pre-existing Relationship). This single positive factor creates a “halo” that artificially inflates their scores in unrelated technical categories compared to Vendor Y, whose proposal is objectively stronger on technical merits.

| Evaluation Criterion | Vendor X Score (Halo Effect) | Vendor Y Score (Objective) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pre-existing Relationship (Weight ▴ 10%) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Technical Architecture (Weight ▴ 50%) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Data Security Plan (Weight ▴ 40%) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Weighted Overall Score | 8.7 | 8.6 |

![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

A mid-sized logistics firm, “SwiftShip,” initiated an RFP for a new warehouse management system. The evaluation team consisted of the Head of Operations, a senior IT manager, and a warehouse floor supervisor. The incumbent vendor, “LegacySoft,” had provided the previous system for a decade. A new, agile competitor, “InnovateLogix,” also submitted a compelling proposal.

Initially, the evaluation was unstructured. The Head of Operations, comfortable with the familiar interface of LegacySoft, exhibited strong **Status Quo Bias**. He consistently steered conversations back to the risks of migrating to a new platform. The IT manager, impressed by a single, innovative feature in the InnovateLogix proposal ▴ an AI-powered inventory prediction tool ▴ fell victim to the **Halo Effect**.

He scored InnovateLogix highly across all categories, even in areas like customer support where their proposal was demonstrably weaker. The floor supervisor, meanwhile, was most influenced by the last demo he saw, a slick presentation from InnovateLogix, succumbing to **Recency Bias**.

The initial, informal consensus pointed toward a messy deadlock, with scores reflecting personal preferences rather than objective value. Recognizing the flawed process, the Chief Procurement Officer intervened and mandated a structured, two-stage evaluation. The team was forced to re-evaluate the proposals based on a detailed scoring rubric, first without knowledge of the price. They had to provide written justifications for each score.

This structured process dismantled the biases. The Head of Operations, when forced to compare specific functionalities side-by-side, had to concede that InnovateLogix offered a more efficient workflow. The IT manager, required to score the customer support plan based on the written proposal, had to acknowledge LegacySoft’s superior guarantees.

When the prices were finally revealed, InnovateLogix was slightly more expensive, but the objective qualitative scores demonstrated that their system provided a significantly higher return on investment. The structured process allowed SwiftShip to overcome their initial, biased impressions and select the vendor that offered the most long-term value.

![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

Modern e-procurement and sourcing platforms can be architected to serve as a powerful defense against cognitive bias. The system’s design can guide evaluators toward more objective behavior. Key technological features include:

- **Role-Based Anonymization** ▴ The system can be configured to automatically redact vendor names and branding from proposals, presenting them to evaluators under a randomized code. This feature is a direct technological countermeasure to status quo, confirmation, and halo biases. 

- **Integrated Scoring and Justification** ▴ Digital scorecards should be designed so that a numerical score cannot be submitted without a corresponding justification in a mandatory text field. The system can even prompt evaluators with questions based on the criteria to guide their written analysis. 

- **Deviation Analysis Dashboards** ▴ The platform can provide a real-time dashboard for the procurement lead or facilitator. This dashboard would visualize scoring disparities, automatically flagging criteria where an evaluator’s score deviates from the team average by a certain threshold. This allows for targeted intervention and discussion during the calibration meeting. 

- **Sequential Workflow Enforcement** ▴ The system architecture can enforce the two-stage evaluation process. The pricing module remains locked and inaccessible to evaluators until the system verifies that all qualitative scoring has been completed and submitted. This removes the element of human error or temptation, hard-coding objectivity into the workflow. 

By integrating these features, the technological platform becomes an active participant in the bias mitigation strategy. It transforms the process from one reliant on human discipline to one reinforced by systemic controls, ensuring a more consistent, fair, and defensible evaluation outcome.

![A meticulously engineered mechanism showcases a blue and grey striped block, representing a structured digital asset derivative, precisely engaged by a metallic tool. This setup illustrates high-fidelity execution within a controlled RFQ environment, optimizing block trade settlement and managing counterparty risk through robust market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## References

- Dekel, Omer, and Amos Schurr. “Cognitive Biases in Government Procurement ▴ An Experimental Study.” _Review of Law & Economics_, vol. 10, no. 2, 2014, pp. 169-200. 

- “Mitigating Cognitive Bias Proposal.” _National Contract Management Association_, 2018. 

- Kahneman, Daniel. _Thinking, Fast and Slow_. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

- “RFP Evaluation Guide ▴ 4 Mistakes You Might be Making in Your RFP Process.” _Bonfire_, 2022. 

- “Types of performance review biases & how to avoid them.” _Culture Amp_, 23 June 2021. 

- “Cognitive biases that impact your performance management.” _Zensai_, 5 April 2024. 

- “How can we guard against cognitive biases in procurement?” _Le Groupe Manutan_, 8 June 2021. 

- Thaler, Richard H. and Cass R. Sunstein. _Nudge ▴ Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness_. Yale University Press, 2008.

![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek, spherical, off-white device with a glowing cyan lens symbolizes an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer. It drives High-Fidelity Execution of Digital Asset Derivatives via RFQ Protocols, enabling Optimal Liquidity Aggregation and Price Discovery for Market Microstructure Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

## Beyond the Scorecard

Mastering the mechanics of bias mitigation within the [RFP process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a critical operational discipline. The implementation of structured rubrics, two-stage evaluations, and technologically enforced workflows provides a formidable defense against the most common cognitive pitfalls. These systems introduce a necessary friction, slowing down the intuitive, reflexive parts of the brain to allow the more analytical, deliberate processes to take control. The result is a decision that is more defensible, more objective, and ultimately, more aligned with the strategic goals of the organization.

However, the true evolution of a procurement function lies in cultivating a culture that internalizes these principles. A playbook, no matter how well-designed, is only as effective as the people who wield it. The ultimate goal is to develop a cadre of evaluators who possess a deep-seated awareness of their own cognitive landscapes. This involves fostering an environment of intellectual humility, where challenging assumptions is encouraged and rigorous debate is seen as a sign of a healthy process, not a dysfunctional one.

The most sophisticated evaluation framework is one where each participant becomes a vigilant guardian of their own objectivity, constantly questioning the source of their conclusions. Is this score based on the evidence in the document, or on a feeling derived from a prior interaction? Am I rewarding the quality of the solution, or the quality of the proposal’s graphic design? This internal interrogation, when practiced collectively, transforms the procurement process from a simple compliance exercise into a continuous pursuit of strategic clarity.

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-cognitive-biases-distort-opportunity-cost-calculations-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A crystalline droplet, representing a block trade or liquidity pool, rests precisely on an advanced Crypto Derivatives OS platform. Its internal shimmering particles signify aggregated order flow and implied volatility data, demonstrating high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

## Cognitive Biases

Cognitive biases systematically distort opportunity cost calculations by warping the perception of risk and reward. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision optical system with a teal-hued lens and integrated control module symbolizes institutional-grade digital asset derivatives infrastructure. It facilitates RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution, price discovery within market microstructure, algorithmic liquidity provision, and portfolio margin optimization via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optics-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-evaluation-framework-adapt-for-high-frequency-versus-low-frequency-trading-strategies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek cream-colored device with a dark blue optical sensor embodies Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. It signifies High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, driven by an Intelligence Layer optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-engine-optimized-rfq-protocols-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Evaluation Framework

An evaluation framework adapts by calibrating its measurement of time, cost, and risk to the strategy's specific operational tempo. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/status-quo-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Status Quo Bias

Meaning ▴ Status Quo Bias defines a cognitive tendency for decision-makers to prefer the current state of affairs, resisting change even when a rational analysis indicates a superior alternative exists. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/bias-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-component device with a prominent lens, embodying a sophisticated RFQ workflow engine. Its modular design signifies integrated liquidity pools and dynamic price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Bias Mitigation

Meaning ▴ Bias Mitigation refers to the systematic processes and algorithmic techniques implemented to identify, quantify, and reduce undesirable predispositions or distortions within data sets, models, or decision-making systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lower-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives trading mechanism features a central processing hub with luminous blue accents, symbolizing an intelligence layer driving high fidelity execution. Transparent circular elements represent dynamic liquidity pools and a complex volatility surface, revealing market microstructure and atomic settlement via an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-framework-optimizing-market-microstructure-price-discovery-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Lower Bid Bias

Meaning ▴ Lower Bid Bias describes a market microstructure phenomenon where the effective bid price for an asset consistently resides at a level below its true intrinsic value or the prevailing mid-price, often due to factors such as market fragmentation, informational asymmetries, or structural inefficiencies in aggregated order books. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central dark nexus with intersecting data conduits and swirling translucent elements depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol's intelligence layer. This visualizes dynamic market microstructure, precise price discovery, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-visualizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Confirmation Bias

Meaning ▴ Confirmation Bias represents the cognitive tendency to seek, interpret, favor, and recall information in a manner that confirms one's pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses, often disregarding contradictory evidence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, multi-component system propels a sleek, teal-colored digital asset derivative trade. The complex internal structure represents a proprietary RFQ protocol engine with liquidity aggregation and price discovery mechanisms](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Halo Effect

Meaning ▴ The Halo Effect is defined as a cognitive bias where the perception of a single positive attribute of an entity or asset disproportionately influences the generalized assessment of its other, unrelated attributes, leading to an overall favorable valuation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional grade system component, featuring a reflective intelligence layer lens, symbolizes high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight. This enables price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## Two-Stage Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Two-Stage Evaluation refers to a structured analytical process designed to optimize resource allocation by applying sequential filters to a dataset or set of opportunities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms converge at a central point, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This depicts RFQ protocol aggregation and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-core-liquidity-hub.jpg)

## Cognitive Bias

Meaning ▴ Cognitive bias represents a systematic deviation from rational judgment in decision-making, originating from inherent heuristics or mental shortcuts. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise digital asset derivatives trading mechanism, featuring transparent data conduits symbolizing RFQ protocol execution and multi-leg spread strategies. Intricate gears visualize market microstructure, ensuring high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Vendor Selection

Meaning ▴ Vendor Selection defines the systematic, analytical process undertaken by an institutional entity to identify, evaluate, and onboard third-party service providers for critical technological and operational components within its digital asset derivatives infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central teal-lit mechanism with radiating pathways embodies a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It signifies RFQ protocol processing, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread trades, enabling atomic settlement within market microstructure via quantitative analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Rfp Process

Meaning ▴ The Request for Proposal (RFP) Process defines a formal, structured procurement methodology employed by institutional Principals to solicit detailed proposals from potential vendors for complex technological solutions or specialized services, particularly within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives infrastructure and trading systems. </a>

**Tags:** [Status Quo Bias](https://options.greeks.live/area/status-quo-bias/), [Two-Stage Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/), [Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/decision-making/), [Cognitive Bias](https://options.greeks.live/area/cognitive-bias/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [Halo Effect](https://options.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can an Organization Ensure Rfp Evaluation Criteria Are Truly Objective?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-rfp-evaluation-criteria-are-truly-objective/)
![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery. Internal mechanisms highlight high-fidelity execution, algorithmic trading, and robust RFQ protocol for block trade settlement via a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

An organization ensures RFP objectivity by architecting a weighted, blind evaluation system that quantifies value and neutralizes cognitive bias.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect RFP Evaluators and How Can They Be Countered?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluators-and-how-can-they-be-countered/)
![Two sleek, metallic, and cream-colored cylindrical modules with dark, reflective spherical optical units, resembling advanced Prime RFQ components for high-fidelity execution. Sharp, reflective wing-like structures suggest smart order routing and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives trading, enabling price discovery through RFQ protocols for block trade liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution.jpg)

Cognitive biases in RFP evaluations are systemic judgment flaws that can be countered by architecting a multi-stage, data-driven, and anonymized decision protocol.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in the Executive Sponsor’s Role When Comparing a Technology RFP to a Services RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-executive-sponsors-role-when-comparing-a-technology-rfp-to-a-services-rfp/)
![A complex interplay of translucent teal and beige planes, signifying multi-asset RFQ protocol pathways and structured digital asset derivatives. Two spherical nodes represent atomic settlement points or critical price discovery mechanisms within a Prime RFQ. Water droplets indicate granular market microstructure data, enhancing high-fidelity execution and mitigating counterparty risk for institutional participants.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

The executive sponsor's role shifts from a technical architect in a technology RFP to a relationship cultivator in a services RFP.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Prevent Claims of Bias in Its RFP Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-prevent-claims-of-bias-in-its-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![Highly polished metallic components signify an institutional-grade RFQ engine, the heart of a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its precise engineering enables high-fidelity execution, supporting multi-leg spreads, optimizing liquidity aggregation, and minimizing slippage within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-underpinning-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

An organization prevents bias claims by engineering a procurement system with objective criteria, blind evaluations, and a documented, auditable process.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Prevent Individual Bias from Influencing RFP Scoring?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-prevent-individual-bias-from-influencing-rfp-scoring/)
![A sleek conduit, embodying an RFQ protocol and smart order routing, connects two distinct, semi-spherical liquidity pools. Its transparent core signifies an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-bridging-diverse-liquidity-pools-via-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

An organization prevents bias in RFP scoring by engineering a blind, multi-stage evaluation system with pre-defined, weighted criteria and trained, diverse evaluators.

- 
### [How Can a Transparent Evaluation Model in an RFP Reduce Vendor Selection Bias?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-transparent-evaluation-model-in-an-rfp-reduce-vendor-selection-bias/)
![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols. It symbolizes Aggregated Inquiry, optimal Liquidity Pool access, and Atomic Settlement within a Principal OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A transparent RFP evaluation model reduces vendor selection bias by systemizing judgment through pre-defined, weighted criteria.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Types of Cognitive Bias That Affect Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-cognitive-bias-that-affect-rfp-evaluation/)
![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

Cognitive biases in RFP evaluation are systemic vulnerabilities in the decision-making process that can be mitigated through a structured, data-driven operational framework.

- 
### [How Does Unconscious Bias in an Evaluation Committee Contribute to an Unfair Rfp Outcome?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-unconscious-bias-in-an-evaluation-committee-contribute-to-an-unfair-rfp-outcome/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

Unconscious bias degrades an RFP evaluation from a data-driven analysis into a subjective exercise, producing unfair, value-destroying outcomes.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Types of Cognitive Bias in an Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-cognitive-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution. It underscores high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a secure Prime RFQ, revealing latent liquidity and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

The most common cognitive biases in RFP evaluations are systemic mental shortcuts that substitute subjective feelings for objective criteria.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Scores?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-scores/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-scores/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Scores? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Cognitive biases systematically distort RFP evaluations by substituting objective analysis with subconscious mental shortcuts. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-scores/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T19:25:04+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T19:25:13+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-terminal-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-precise-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg",
        "caption": "A beige, triangular device with a dark, reflective display and dual front apertures rests on a light surface. This advanced terminal, engineered for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, optimizes RFQ protocols. It facilitates real-time market microstructure analysis, ensuring high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and capital efficiency for complex multi-leg spreads and block trades. Essential for minimizing slippage and adverse selection in low-latency prime brokerage environments."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Anchoring Bias",
        "Behavioral Economics",
        "Bias Mitigation",
        "Cognitive Bias",
        "Confirmation Bias",
        "Decision Making",
        "Halo Effect",
        "Lower Bid Bias",
        "Procurement Bias",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Process",
        "Status Quo Bias",
        "Structured Evaluation",
        "Two-Stage Evaluation",
        "Vendor Selection"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-scores/
