# What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Designing an RFP Scoring Template for Technology Procurement? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sharp, teal blade precisely dissects a cylindrical conduit. This visualizes surgical high-fidelity execution of block trades for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-microstructure.jpg)

![A precision metallic dial on a multi-layered interface embodies an institutional RFQ engine. The translucent panel suggests an intelligence layer for real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency for block trades within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Concept

The request for proposal (RFP) [scoring template](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-frequently-should-a-standard-rfp-scoring-template-be-reviewed-and-updated-by-an-organization/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) represents the central processing unit of a [technology procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) decision. It is a purpose-built system designed to translate the abstract language of strategic objectives into a quantifiable, defensible, and actionable evaluation framework. Its function is to process complex, often disparate, vendor submissions through a predefined logical structure, yielding a clear output that points toward the optimal solution.

When designed with precision, this system ensures that every feature, service level, and cost component is assessed against a consistent, predetermined value system. The process of designing this template is an exercise in systems engineering, where the quality of the output is a direct function of the integrity of the internal logic.

Many organizations approach this critical task as an administrative exercise, assembling a checklist of desired features and assigning arbitrary weights. This perspective fundamentally misunderstands the instrument’s purpose. A poorly constructed scoring template does not simply produce a suboptimal vendor choice; it injects systemic risk into the organization’s technological and operational future. It creates a distorted lens through which all subsequent information is viewed, amplifying biases and misinterpreting value.

The common pitfalls encountered in its design are symptoms of a flawed underlying architecture, revealing a disconnect between the organization’s strategic intent and its execution of the [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Understanding these pitfalls is the first step in engineering a procurement system that consistently delivers technology aligned with long-term enterprise value.

> A well-designed RFP scoring template functions as a deterministic algorithm, converting vendor proposals into a clear measure of strategic value.

![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

## The Systemic Nature of Scoring Flaws

Each common pitfall in [RFP scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) design can be viewed as a specific type of architectural defect. For instance, an over-reliance on price is a weighting imbalance that corrupts the entire system’s output, analogous to a sensor that is improperly calibrated and throws off all subsequent calculations. Vague scoring criteria introduce ambiguity, creating a non-deterministic process where the same input can produce different outputs depending on the evaluator, a critical failure in any logical system.

A failure to engage business-line subject matter experts is a failure of data integration, where the system operates on an incomplete dataset, inevitably leading to a flawed conclusion. The template is not a static document but the codified logic of the decision itself.

Therefore, rectifying these issues requires more than superficial adjustments. It demands a re-architecting of the evaluation process itself. The conversation must shift from “What should we ask?” to “How does our evaluation system measure value?” This perspective elevates the design process from a clerical task to a strategic imperative.

It forces a rigorous examination of what constitutes success for the technology implementation, how those success factors interrelate, and how they can be represented with quantitative and qualitative metrics. The resulting template becomes a powerful tool for aligning stakeholders, communicating priorities, and making a choice that is robust, transparent, and directly linked to the organization’s core objectives.

![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

![A clear glass sphere, symbolizing a precise RFQ block trade, rests centrally on a sophisticated Prime RFQ platform. The metallic surface suggests intricate market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery for institutional grade trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework for an [RFP scoring template](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-template/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) involves designing a value-measurement system that is both precise and aligned with enterprise goals. The strategy is not merely about selecting criteria but about architecting a hierarchy of priorities and a clear logic for trade-offs. This process begins with a foundational understanding that every element of the scoring template ▴ from the highest-level category to the most granular question ▴ is an instruction to the [evaluation team](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) on how to think about the decision. A robust strategy ensures these instructions are clear, consistent, and calibrated to the unique context of the procurement.

![Sleek, metallic components with reflective blue surfaces depict an advanced institutional RFQ protocol. Its central pivot and radiating arms symbolize aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution, optimizing order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Architecting the Value Hierarchy

The most critical strategic decision is the establishment of a value hierarchy through the weighting of scoring categories. This is where the organization translates its strategic intent into mathematical terms. A common architectural flaw is the disproportionate weighting of acquisition price, a practice that often leads to a higher [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) over the technology’s lifecycle. A more sophisticated strategy involves a multi-dimensional view of cost and value, recognizing that factors like implementation overhead, integration complexity, vendor stability, and feature velocity have profound economic consequences.

The weighting architecture should be a direct reflection of the project’s primary drivers. Is the new technology intended to drive revenue, reduce operational risk, enhance customer experience, or replace a legacy system to reduce technical debt? Each of these goals implies a different weighting scheme. A system intended to reduce operational risk might place a higher weight on vendor support, security protocols, and system uptime guarantees, while a revenue-driving platform might prioritize user experience, feature set, and integration capabilities with other go-to-market systems.

> The strategic allocation of weights within a scoring template codifies the organization’s priorities and dictates the terms of the value conversation.

![Precision-engineered multi-vane system with opaque, reflective, and translucent teal blades. This visualizes Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure, driving High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing Liquidity Pool aggregation, and Multi-Leg Spread management on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-multi-vane-system-illustrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## A Comparative Analysis of Weighting Models

Different weighting models can lead to dramatically different outcomes. Consider the procurement of a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform. The table below illustrates how a simplistic, price-focused model compares to a strategic, value-focused model. The latter distributes weight across a broader set of criteria that reflect the long-term health of the investment.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparison of Price-Centric vs. Value-Centric Weighting Models for a CRM Procurement

| Evaluation Category | Price-Centric Model Weight (%) | Value-Centric Model Weight (%) | Strategic Rationale for Value-Centric Weight |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Functional Capabilities | 30% | 35% | The primary purpose of the system is to deliver specific business functions. This category receives the highest weight to ensure the core requirements are met. |
| Technical Architecture & Integration | 15% | 20% | Ease of integration with existing systems and scalability are critical for long-term success and minimizing technical debt. |
| Vendor Viability & Support | 10% | 15% | A strong, stable vendor with excellent support reduces long-term risk and ensures the platform can evolve with business needs. |
| Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | 45% | 20% | Shifts focus from upfront price to a holistic view including implementation, training, maintenance, and potential future customization costs. |
| Implementation & User Adoption Plan | 0% | 10% | A great technology that is poorly implemented or not used by employees provides zero value. This assesses the vendor’s plan for ensuring success. |

![A central control knob on a metallic platform, bisected by sharp reflective lines, embodies an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts intricate market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery for multi-leg options, and robust Prime RFQ deployment, optimizing latent liquidity across digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Defining the Scoring Mechanism

With the weighting architecture established, the next strategic layer is the scoring mechanism itself. A common pitfall is the use of an ill-defined or overly simplistic scoring scale. A three-point scale (e.g. “Meets,” “Partially Meets,” “Does Not Meet”) lacks the necessary granularity to differentiate between two strong but distinct proposals.

A more effective approach utilizes a five or ten-point scale, where each point value is associated with a clear, objective description. This transforms scoring from a subjective exercise into a more disciplined, rubric-based evaluation.

The strategy for defining these scales must focus on removing ambiguity. For example, when evaluating a criterion like “Customer Support,” the [scoring rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) should be explicit:

- **5 – Exceptional** ▴ Guaranteed 24/7 live support with a dedicated account manager and a [response time](https://prime.greeks.live/area/response-time/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of less than 1 hour for [critical issues](https://prime.greeks.live/question/could-mandatory-clearing-in-treasury-markets-exacerbate-liquidity-issues-during-a-crisis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Proactive system monitoring included.

- **4 – Strong** ▴ 24/7 live support available with a response time of 2-4 hours for critical issues.

- **3 – Standard** ▴ Support available during standard business hours (9am-5pm) via phone and email. Response time of 8 hours for critical issues.

- **2 – Limited** ▴ Support available only via email or a ticketing system, with a 24-hour response time.

- **1 – Deficient** ▴ No clearly defined support structure or Service Level Agreement (SLA).

This level of definition ensures that all evaluators are using the same mental model when assigning a score, dramatically improving the consistency and defensibility of the final results. It also forces the organization to define what “good” looks like in concrete terms before the evaluation begins.

![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase translates the strategic design of the RFP scoring template into a functional, operational tool. This is where architectural theory meets procedural rigor. A flawless execution ensures that the evaluation process is transparent, consistent, and capable of withstanding scrutiny. This requires meticulous attention to the construction of the scoring instrument, the establishment of clear protocols for the evaluation team, and a disciplined approach to normalizing and interpreting the resulting data.

![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Constructing the Scoring Instrument

The scoring template itself is the primary artifact of the execution phase. It must be comprehensive, clear, and logically structured. A best-practice approach is to build the template in a spreadsheet application, with distinct sections for each evaluation category.

Each row represents a specific requirement, and columns are used for the requirement description, the weight, the scoring scale, each evaluator’s score, the weighted score, and a section for evaluator comments. This structure provides a complete audit trail of the decision-making process.

The questions and requirements listed in the template must be specific, measurable, and unambiguous. Vague questions yield vague answers, making objective scoring impossible. For example, instead of asking, “Does the vendor provide good support?” the requirement should be, “The vendor must provide a Service Level Agreement (SLA) detailing 24/7/365 support for critical issues with a maximum response time of two hours.” This allows for a simple, verifiable “Yes/No” or a score based on the degree of compliance.

> A well-constructed scoring instrument leaves no room for ambiguity, forcing clarity from both the vendor’s response and the evaluator’s assessment.

![Angular metallic structures precisely intersect translucent teal planes against a dark backdrop. This embodies an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform's market microstructure, signifying high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-system-architecture.jpg)

## Sample Scoring Template for an Integrated Risk Management System

The following table provides a detailed, executable example of a scoring template section for a hypothetical technology procurement. It demonstrates the necessary level of granularity in requirements, the clear definition of scoring rubrics, and the integration of weights to reflect strategic priorities.

### Table 2 ▴ Detailed Scoring Section for Functional Capabilities of an IRM System

| Requirement ID | Requirement Description | Weight (%) | Scoring Rubric (1-5) | Evaluator 1 Score | Evaluator 2 Score | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| F-1.1 | The system must provide a centralized risk register with configurable risk taxonomies and hierarchies. | 10% | 5=Out-of-the-box, no code; 3=Configurable with admin tools; 1=Requires custom development. | | | |
| F-1.2 | The system must support automated control testing and evidence collection via integrations with key source systems (e.g. Active Directory, AWS). | 15% | 5=Native connectors for all specified systems; 3=Connectors for some, API for others; 1=Requires third-party middleware or manual uploads. | | | |
| F-1.3 | The system must provide real-time, customizable dashboards and reporting for different stakeholder groups (e.g. Board, Senior Management, Risk Owners). | 10% | 5=Drag-and-drop interface with extensive visualization options; 3=Standard reports are customizable, new reports require vendor support; 1=Limited, static reporting. | | | |

![A sharp, metallic instrument precisely engages a textured, grey object. This symbolizes High-Fidelity Execution within institutional RFQ protocols for Digital Asset Derivatives, visualizing precise Price Discovery, minimizing Slippage, and optimizing Capital Efficiency via Prime RFQ for Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocols-precision-execution-prime-os-liquidity.jpg)

## Establishing the Evaluation Protocol

A structured protocol is necessary to guide the evaluation team and ensure a fair and consistent process. This protocol should be documented and distributed to all evaluators before they receive the RFP responses. It governs how individuals score, how the team communicates, and how discrepancies are resolved.

- **Initial Compliance Screen** ▴ Before detailed evaluation, a designated procurement lead should screen all proposals for mandatory compliance. Any proposal that fails to meet non-negotiable requirements (e.g. submission deadline, required certifications) is disqualified.

- **Individual Evaluation Phase** ▴ Each evaluator must score every proposal independently, without consulting other team members. This prevents “groupthink” and ensures that a diverse set of perspectives is captured in the initial scores. Evaluators should be required to provide a comment justifying any score that is particularly high or low.

- **Data Normalization** ▴ The procurement lead collects all individual scoring sheets. They analyze the scores for significant variances between evaluators. Some evaluators may consistently score higher or lower than their peers; understanding these personal tendencies is important context for the next phase.

- **The [Consensus Meeting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-meeting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The evaluation team convenes for a consensus meeting facilitated by the procurement lead. The purpose of this meeting is not to force everyone to the same score, but to understand the reasoning behind the scores. The discussion should focus on the requirements with the highest score variance. An evaluator might have misinterpreted a vendor’s response or have unique expertise that allowed them to spot a critical weakness others missed.

- **Final Score Adjustment** ▴ After the consensus discussion, evaluators are given the opportunity to adjust their scores based on the new information and insights gained from the team. This adjustment must be documented with a clear rationale. The final score for each vendor is the average of the adjusted scores from all evaluators.

This disciplined, multi-stage protocol ensures that the final decision is the product of collective intelligence and rigorous analysis, rather than the isolated opinions of a few individuals. It creates a transparent and defensible record that can be used to justify the selection to leadership, auditors, and even the unsuccessful vendors.

![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## References

- Pressey, Andrew D. and Brian P. Mathews. “The value of procurement and the role of the RFI/RFP.” _Marketing Intelligence & Planning_, vol. 24, no. 1, 2006, pp. 15-27.

- Schotanus, Fredo, and Jos van Iwaarden. “An analysis of the drivers for developing and using e-procurement systems.” _The Journal of Supply Chain Management_, vol. 45, no. 3, 2009, pp. 3-17.

- Talluri, Srinivas, and Ram Ganeshan. “Vendor evaluation and selection ▴ a review of the literature.” _International Journal of Production Research_, vol. 40, no. 16, 2002, pp. 3949-3967.

- De Boer, Luitzen, et al. “A review of methods supporting supplier selection.” _European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management_, vol. 7, no. 2, 2001, pp. 75-89.

- Humphreys, P. et al. “Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process.” _Journal of Materials Processing Technology_, vol. 138, no. 1-3, 2003, pp. 349-356.

- Kahraman, Cengiz, et al. “A fuzzy multi-criteria methodology for the selection of a new technology.” _International Journal of Production Research_, vol. 41, no. 9, 2003, pp. 1927-1945.

- Bhutta, Khurrum S. and Faizul Huq. “Supplier selection problem ▴ a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches.” _Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal_, vol. 7, no. 3, 2002, pp. 126-135.

- Davila, Antonio, et al. “The adoption of management control systems for the new product development process ▴ the role of the product development strategy.” _Journal of Accounting Research_, vol. 47, no. 1, 2009, pp. 115-156.

![Engineered components in beige, blue, and metallic tones form a complex, layered structure. This embodies the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol framework for optimizing price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and managing counterparty risk within multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-optimization.jpg)

## Reflection

![Abstract geometric planes delineate distinct institutional digital asset derivatives liquidity pools. Stark contrast signifies market microstructure shift via advanced RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-execution-protocol-integrating-rfq-liquidity-and-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## From Template to Intelligence System

Ultimately, the RFP scoring template is more than a procurement tool; it is a reflection of the organization’s decision-making maturity. A meticulously designed and executed scoring process transforms the template from a static document into a dynamic intelligence system. This system does not simply select a vendor.

It captures and codifies institutional knowledge, clarifies strategic priorities, and creates a framework for objective, evidence-based conversations among stakeholders. It forces the organization to define value before seeking it and to measure it with discipline upon receipt.

The true measure of the system’s success is not just the quality of the technology acquired, but the enhanced capability of the organization to make complex, high-stakes decisions. When the principles of rigorous system design are applied to the procurement process, the organization builds more than a new technology stack. It builds a more intelligent and aligned enterprise, capable of navigating the complexities of technological change with confidence and precision. The final question for any organization is not whether its template is complete, but whether its evaluation system is truly engineered for insight.

![A sleek, multi-layered institutional crypto derivatives platform interface, featuring a transparent intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Buttons signify RFQ protocol initiation for block trades, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within a robust Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-precision-execution-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Technology Procurement

Meaning ▴ Technology Procurement defines the methodical acquisition of specialized hardware, software platforms, and associated services essential for establishing, maintaining, and enhancing an institution's capabilities in digital asset trading, risk management, and post-trade processing. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-frequently-should-a-standard-rfp-scoring-template-be-reviewed-and-updated-by-an-organization/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

## Scoring Template

An RFP scoring template should be reviewed annually and updated dynamically in response to market, regulatory, or strategic shifts. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A smooth, off-white sphere rests within a meticulously engineered digital asset derivatives RFQ platform, featuring distinct teal and dark blue metallic components. This sophisticated market microstructure enables private quotation, high-fidelity execution, and optimized price discovery for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-microstructure-core.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring

Meaning ▴ RFP Scoring defines the structured, quantitative methodology employed to evaluate and rank vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal, particularly for complex technology and service procurements within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-template/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular translucent teal structures intersect on a smooth base, reflecting light against a deep blue sphere. This embodies RFQ Protocol architecture, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dynamic-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring Template

Meaning ▴ An RFP Scoring Template is a structured, standardized framework designed for the systematic evaluation of Request for Proposal submissions, particularly within the context of institutional procurement for digital asset derivatives infrastructure or service providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Stacked modular components with a sharp fin embody Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives. This represents High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, enabling Price Discovery, optimizing Capital Efficiency, and managing Gamma Exposure within an Institutional Prime RFQ for Block Trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-system-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization.jpg)

## Evaluation Team

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Team constitutes a dedicated internal or external unit systematically tasked with the rigorous assessment of technological systems, operational protocols, or trading strategies within the institutional digital asset derivatives domain. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A blue speckled marble, symbolizing a precise block trade, rests centrally on a translucent bar, representing a robust RFQ protocol. This structured geometric arrangement illustrates complex market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient liquidity aggregation within a principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-across-complex-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric represents a meticulously structured evaluation framework, comprising a defined set of criteria and associated weighting mechanisms, employed to objectively assess the performance, compliance, or quality of a system, process, or entity, often within the rigorous context of institutional digital asset operations or algorithmic execution performance assessment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/could-mandatory-clearing-in-treasury-markets-exacerbate-liquidity-issues-during-a-crisis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

## Critical Issues

Mandatory Treasury clearing centralizes counterparty risk, yet may introduce procyclical liquidity strains during a crisis. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/response-time/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A glowing blue module with a metallic core and extending probe is set into a pristine white surface. This symbolizes an active institutional RFQ protocol, enabling precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-precise-price-discovery-for-block-trades-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Response Time

Meaning ▴ Response Time quantifies the elapsed duration between a specific triggering event and a system's subsequent, measurable reaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-meeting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-component device in dark blue and beige, symbolizing an advanced institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The central sphere denotes a robust liquidity pool for aggregated inquiry](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-system.jpg)

## Consensus Meeting

Meaning ▴ A Consensus Meeting represents a formalized procedural mechanism designed to achieve collective agreement among designated stakeholders regarding critical operational parameters, protocol adjustments, or strategic directional shifts within a distributed system or institutional framework. </a>

**Tags:** [Supplier Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-selection/), [Vendor Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-evaluation/), [Risk Management System](https://options.greeks.live/area/risk-management-system/), [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/), [Evaluation Team](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/), [RFP Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Structure an RFP to Ensure a Fair Comparison between Incumbents and New Bidders?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-structure-an-rfp-to-ensure-a-fair-comparison-between-incumbents-and-new-bidders/)
![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

A structured RFP protocol neutralizes incumbent advantage by converting subjective familiarity into objective, comparable data points.

- 
### [How Does a Cross-Functional Evaluation Team Contribute to a More Robust Rfp Outcome?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-cross-functional-evaluation-team-contribute-to-a-more-robust-rfp-outcome/)
![A sophisticated modular component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, featuring an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Its precision engineering facilitates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency for institutional participants.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-module.jpg)

A cross-functional team integrates disparate expertise into a unified system, ensuring RFP outcomes reflect holistic value.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Ensure Objectivity When Multiple Stakeholders Are Involved in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-objectivity-when-multiple-stakeholders-are-involved-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A precisely engineered multi-component structure, split to reveal its granular core, symbolizes the complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor represents the unbundling of multi-leg spreads, facilitating transparent price discovery and high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-revealing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-within-principals-operational-framework.jpg)

A structured, data-driven framework with weighted criteria and a cross-functional team ensures defensible objectivity in RFP evaluations.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Components of a Legally Defensible Rfp Scoring System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-components-of-a-legally-defensible-rfp-scoring-system/)
![A sleek, dark metallic surface features a cylindrical module with a luminous blue top, embodying a Prime RFQ control for RFQ protocol initiation. This institutional-grade interface enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives block trades, ensuring private quotation and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A defensible RFP scoring system translates strategic priorities into an objective, auditable framework that ensures fair evaluation and mitigates legal risk.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Creating a Defensible and Transparent Rfp Scoring System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-creating-a-defensible-and-transparent-rfp-scoring-system/)
![A transparent, angular teal object with an embedded dark circular lens rests on a light surface. This visualizes an institutional-grade RFQ engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives. It optimizes capital efficiency, manages counterparty risk, supports multi-leg spread strategies, and provides deep market microstructure insights within a Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A defensible RFP scoring system translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable, transparent, and auditable vendor evaluation framework.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Methods for Developing and Weighting Evaluation Criteria in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-methods-for-developing-and-weighting-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/)
![A precision mechanism, potentially a component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases intricate Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution. Transparent elements suggest Price Discovery and Latent Liquidity within RFQ Protocols. Its robust design implies Capital Efficiency and minimized Slippage for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Developing and weighting RFP criteria is a systematic process of translating strategic objectives into a defensible, quantitative decision model.

- 
### [How Does a Weighted Scoring System in an RFP Contribute to a More Objective Decision?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-system-in-an-rfp-contribute-to-a-more-objective-decision/)
![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. Background diagonals abstractly depict market microstructure optimization via RFQ protocols ensuring high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

A weighted scoring system contributes to objectivity by translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable evaluation framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Accurately Factor Total Cost of Ownership into an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-accurately-factor-total-cost-of-ownership-into-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A detailed view of an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading interface, featuring a central liquidity pool visualization through a clear, tinted disc. Subtle market microstructure elements are visible, suggesting real-time price discovery and order book dynamics. This represents a Prime RFQ component for high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols in multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-display.jpg)

A TCO-driven RFP model transforms procurement into a system for forecasting and optimizing long-term value, not just minimizing initial price.

- 
### [Should the Cost Be the Most Heavily Weighted Criterion in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/should-the-cost-be-the-most-heavily-weighted-criterion-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Two smooth, teal spheres, representing institutional liquidity pools, precisely balance a metallic object, symbolizing a block trade executed via RFQ protocol. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-bridging-institutional-liquidity-pools-via-rfq-protocol-for-optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

Cost should be a significant, but not dominant, criterion in an RFP evaluation, balanced against quality, service, and long-term value.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Designing an RFP Scoring Template for Technology Procurement?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-designing-an-rfp-scoring-template-for-technology-procurement/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-designing-an-rfp-scoring-template-for-technology-procurement/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Designing an RFP Scoring Template for Technology Procurement? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An RFP scoring template's integrity dictates procurement success by translating strategic goals into a quantifiable vendor evaluation system. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-designing-an-rfp-scoring-template-for-technology-procurement/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T19:07:15+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T19:07:19+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract composition illustrates the intricate mechanisms of institutional digital asset derivatives trading. A robust, engineered base, emblematic of a Prime RFQ and its execution management system, underpins a vibrant, semi-translucent disc, representing a deep liquidity pool or volatility surface within crypto derivatives. A sharp, golden diagonal element signifies the precise, low-latency pathway of an RFQ protocol for block trade execution, ensuring best execution and mitigating slippage. This visual metaphor highlights the strategic advantage in navigating order book dynamics for alpha generation in complex multi-leg spreads."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Consensus Meeting",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Evaluation Team",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Response Time",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "RFP Scoring Template",
        "Risk Management System",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Stakeholder Alignment",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Technology Procurement",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Evaluation",
        "Weighting Criteria"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-designing-an-rfp-scoring-template-for-technology-procurement/
