# What Are the Most Common Types of Bias in an Rfp Evaluation Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Metallic, reflective components depict high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. A central circular element symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivative, like a Bitcoin option, processed via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The Request for Proposal (RFP) [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) represents a critical juncture in an organization’s capital allocation and strategic partnership formation. It is engineered to be a mechanism of pure objectivity, a structured protocol for identifying the optimal solution to a defined problem set. The core premise is that a systematic comparison of vendor proposals against a predetermined set of criteria will yield the most logical, value-driven procurement decision. This is the system as designed.

The system in practice, however, operates within a human framework, and is therefore susceptible to the subtle, persistent friction of cognitive and systemic bias. These are not isolated errors in judgment; they are predictable patterns of deviation from rational assessment that can degrade the integrity of the entire evaluation architecture.

Understanding bias within this context requires moving beyond a simple acknowledgment of its existence. It demands a systemic analysis of the evaluation process itself, viewing it as an operating system that can either amplify or dampen these inherent human tendencies. The various forms of bias ▴ from the affinity for the familiar to the disproportionate weight given to a single data point ▴ are bugs in the cognitive code of the evaluators. When left unaddressed, these bugs can lead to suboptimal outcomes ▴ misaligned partnerships, inflated costs, and unrealized value.

The objective is to design and implement an evaluation framework so robust, so logically sound, that it insulates the decision-making process from the very predictability of human error. This involves constructing a system of checks and balances, weighted scoring, and procedural discipline that functions as a firewall against subjective influence, ensuring the final selection is a product of strategic logic rather than latent prejudice.

> A truly effective RFP evaluation system is one that accounts for and neutralizes the inherent biases of its human operators.

![Sleek metallic structures with glowing apertures symbolize institutional RFQ protocols. These represent high-fidelity execution and price discovery across aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-systems-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## The Systemic Nature of Evaluation Flaws

Bias in an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is rarely a conscious act of favoritism. Instead, it manifests as a series of small, almost imperceptible distortions in the analytical process. These distortions accumulate, subtly shifting the outcome away from the most logical choice toward one that feels more comfortable or familiar to the evaluation team. This systemic drift can be traced to two primary sources ▴ cognitive shortcuts and organizational pressures.

Cognitive shortcuts, or heuristics, are mental models the human brain uses to simplify complex decisions. While efficient, they can introduce predictable errors. Organizational pressures, such as a desire to maintain existing vendor relationships or a preference for well-known brands, create a pre-existing narrative that can unconsciously shape how evaluators interpret proposal data.

For instance, [Confirmation Bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) leads evaluators to favor information that supports their initial impressions. If a vendor makes a strong first impression, evaluators may subconsciously seek out data points in the proposal that validate this positive feeling, while downplaying or ignoring contradictory evidence. The [Halo Effect](https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) operates similarly, where a positive impression in one area, such as a polished presentation, extends to an uncritical assessment of other, unrelated areas, like technical capability.

These are not failures of intent, but failures of the system’s design to account for the known limitations of human cognition. Acknowledging this systemic vulnerability is the foundational step in architecting a more resilient, objective, and ultimately more effective procurement protocol.

![Precision-engineered multi-layered architecture depicts institutional digital asset derivatives platforms, showcasing modularity for optimal liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement. This visualizes sophisticated RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution and robust pre-trade analytics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/modular-digital-asset-derivative-prime-os-for-institutional-rfq-and-block-trade-execution.jpg)

![A sleek, two-part system, a robust beige chassis complementing a dark, reflective core with a glowing blue edge. This represents an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity execution for RFQ protocols in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-3.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework to counteract bias in the RFP evaluation process requires a precise taxonomy of the potential failure points. By categorizing the different forms of bias, we can design specific, targeted interventions. The goal is to move from a reactive posture, where bias is discovered after the fact, to a proactive one, where the evaluation system is pre-emptively engineered for objectivity.

This involves creating a multi-layered defense that addresses individual cognition, group dynamics, and procedural integrity. Each layer of this defense is designed to isolate and neutralize a specific category of bias, thereby strengthening the overall logical soundness of the evaluation architecture.

![A meticulously engineered mechanism showcases a blue and grey striped block, representing a structured digital asset derivative, precisely engaged by a metallic tool. This setup illustrates high-fidelity execution within a controlled RFQ environment, optimizing block trade settlement and managing counterparty risk through robust market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## A Taxonomy of Evaluator Bias

The biases that can influence an RFP evaluation are numerous and often intertwined. They can be broadly grouped into categories based on their origin ▴ cognitive, social, and structural. Understanding this classification is the first step in developing targeted mitigation strategies. Each type of bias represents a unique vulnerability in the evaluation system, requiring a specific countermeasure.

![A transparent, precisely engineered optical array rests upon a reflective dark surface, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ. Beige conduits represent latency-optimized data pipelines facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-architecture.jpg)

## Cognitive and Heuristic Biases

[These biases](https://prime.greeks.live/question/beyond-the-obvious-biases-like-confirmation-and-anchoring-what-are-some-less-common-biases-that-can-affect-an-rfp-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) stem from the mental shortcuts individuals use to process information and make decisions. They are inherent to human cognition and represent the most common source of skewed evaluations.

- **Confirmation Bias** ▴ The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms or supports one’s pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses. An evaluator who has a positive prior opinion of a vendor will unconsciously look for evidence in the RFP response that validates that opinion.

- **Anchoring Bias** ▴ The reliance on the first piece of information received when making decisions. If the first proposal reviewed is exceptionally strong or weak, it can set an artificial benchmark against which all subsequent proposals are measured, rather than evaluating each on its own merits against the established criteria.

- **Halo and Horns Effect** ▴ This bias occurs when an evaluator’s overall impression of a vendor is unduly influenced by a single positive (Halo) or negative (Horns) trait. A well-designed presentation could create a halo effect that inflates scores in unrelated technical areas, while a single typo could create a horns effect that unfairly penalizes an otherwise strong proposal.

- **Recency Bias** ▴ Giving greater importance to the most recent information received. An evaluator might overemphasize a vendor’s final presentation or the last section of their proposal, forgetting crucial details from earlier in the document.

- **Leniency or Severity Bias** ▴ The tendency for an evaluator to be consistently too generous (Leniency) or too harsh (Severity) in their scoring, often to avoid conflict or due to their disposition. This skews the data when aggregated with scores from more objective evaluators.

> The architecture of an unbiased evaluation process must be built on the principle of isolating vendor identity from proposal content.

![A stacked, multi-colored modular system representing an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The top unit facilitates RFQ protocol initiation and dynamic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-15.jpg)

## Social and Group-Dynamic Biases

These biases arise from the interactions between members of the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). They are a product of group dynamics and social influence.

- **[Groupthink](https://prime.greeks.live/area/groupthink/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ A psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Dissenting opinions are discouraged, and the group coalesces around a consensus view without critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints.

- **Similar-to-Me Bias** ▴ The tendency to give a higher rating to individuals who are perceived as being similar to the evaluator in terms of background, interests, or personality. This can lead to favoring vendors whose representatives share a similar communication style or alma mater, irrespective of the proposal’s quality.

![A blue speckled marble, symbolizing a precise block trade, rests centrally on a translucent bar, representing a robust RFQ protocol. This structured geometric arrangement illustrates complex market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient liquidity aggregation within a principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-across-complex-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Structural and Systemic Biases

These biases are embedded in the [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) itself or the broader organizational culture. They are often the most difficult to identify and address.

- **[Incumbent Bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/incumbent-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ A preference for the existing vendor, driven by risk aversion to change and the comfort of a known relationship. Evaluators may unconsciously score the incumbent higher on subjective criteria like “understanding of our needs” and downplay their weaknesses.

- **Brand Bias** ▴ The assumption that a large, well-known company will provide a superior solution, regardless of the specific details of their proposal. This can cause evaluators to overlook innovative solutions from smaller, less-known vendors.

- **Cultural Fit Bias** ▴ This is a subtle but pervasive bias where evaluators favor vendors that seem to align with the company’s internal culture. While some level of partnership alignment is necessary, “cultural fit” can become a catch-all justification for rejecting vendors who think differently, thereby stifling innovation.

A strategic approach to mitigating these biases involves designing the evaluation process to systematically dismantle their influence. This means creating clear, objective criteria, enforcing procedural discipline, and building in mechanisms for independent review and validation.

### Table 1 ▴ Bias Taxonomy and Mitigation Framework

| Bias Category | Specific Bias | Systemic Vulnerability | Primary Mitigation Strategy |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cognitive | Confirmation Bias | Evaluators seek data to support initial impressions. | Structured scoring against predefined criteria; blind evaluation. |
| Cognitive | Anchoring Bias | First proposal sets an artificial benchmark. | Randomize proposal review order for each evaluator. |
| Cognitive | Halo/Horns Effect | One trait disproportionately influences overall assessment. | Score criteria independently; separate evaluators for technical vs. commercial sections. |
| Social | Groupthink | Desire for consensus overrides critical evaluation. | Individual evaluation before group discussion; appoint a “devil’s advocate”. |
| Social | Similar-to-Me Bias | Favoritism towards vendors with shared characteristics. | Blind scoring; diverse evaluation committee. |
| Structural | Incumbent Bias | Inherent preference for the current vendor. | Explicitly weight criteria for innovation and new technology; blind evaluation of key sections. |
| Structural | Brand Bias | Large brands perceived as less risky. | Blind scoring; focus on solution-specific capabilities over company size. |

![A geometric abstraction depicts a central multi-segmented disc intersected by angular teal and white structures, symbolizing a sophisticated Principal-driven RFQ protocol engine. This represents high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives like Bitcoin options, ensuring atomic settlement and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-prime-os.jpg)

![A central, symmetrical, multi-faceted mechanism with four radiating arms, crafted from polished metallic and translucent blue-green components, represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. Its intricate design signifies multi-leg spread algorithmic execution for liquidity aggregation, ensuring atomic settlement within crypto derivatives OS market microstructure for prime brokerage clients](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a bias-free RFP evaluation is a matter of procedural discipline and architectural foresight. It requires the implementation of a clear, multi-stage protocol that systematically isolates and neutralizes potential points of subjective influence. This is not about removing human judgment from the process; it is about ensuring that judgment is applied to the objective evidence presented in the proposals, rather than to extraneous factors like brand reputation or personal affinity. The following protocol outlines a robust framework for executing an RFP evaluation designed for maximum objectivity.

![Intersecting concrete structures symbolize the robust Market Microstructure underpinning Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Dynamic spheres represent Liquidity Pools and Implied Volatility](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-optimizing-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-for-principal-trading.jpg)

## The Five-Phase Protocol for Objective Evaluation

This protocol breaks the evaluation process into five distinct phases, each with specific controls to mitigate bias.

![An abstract system depicts an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform. Interwoven metallic conduits symbolize low-latency RFQ execution pathways, facilitating efficient block trade routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

## Phase 1 ▴ Architectural Design and Criteria Weighting

The foundation of an objective evaluation is built before the RFP is even issued. This phase involves defining what success looks like in granular, measurable terms.

- **Establish a Diverse Evaluation Committee** ▴ The committee should include stakeholders from different departments (e.g. IT, finance, operations) to ensure a multi-faceted perspective and dilute individual biases.

- **Define and Weight Criteria** ▴ The committee must collaboratively define the evaluation criteria. These criteria must be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). Each criterion is then assigned a weight based on its strategic importance. This must be finalized before any proposals are reviewed. This prevents evaluators from later changing the importance of a criterion to favor a preferred vendor.

### Table 2 ▴ Sample Weighted Scoring Matrix

| Category | Specific Criterion | Weight (%) | Scoring Scale (1-5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (40%) | Core Functionality Alignment | 20% | 1=Fails to meet, 5=Exceeds requirements |
| Vendor Capability (25%) | Implementation Support | 15% | 1=Email only, 5=Dedicated team |
| Pricing (35%) | Total Cost of Ownership | 25% | Scored relative to lowest bid |

![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Phase 2 ▴ Anonymization and Independent Evaluation

This phase focuses on isolating the proposal’s content from the vendor’s identity.

- **[Blind Scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/blind-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Protocol** ▴ A non-evaluator (the “collator”) receives all proposals. This individual redacts all vendor-identifying information (names, logos, etc.) from the documents before distributing them to the evaluation committee. Each proposal is assigned a random code (e.g. Proposal A, Proposal B).

- **Individual Scoring** ▴ Each evaluator must score the anonymized proposals independently, without consulting other committee members. They must enter their scores and justifications for each criterion into the official scoring matrix. This prevents groupthink from taking hold in the initial assessment.

![A reflective digital asset pipeline bisects a dynamic gradient, symbolizing high-fidelity RFQ execution across fragmented market microstructure. Concentric rings denote the Prime RFQ centralizing liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and managing counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-2.jpg)

## Phase 3 ▴ Consensus and Calibration

This phase brings the committee together to reconcile their individual scores and arrive at a collective assessment.

- **Reveal and Compare Scores** ▴ The collator compiles all the individual scoring sheets. The committee then meets to review the scores. Significant variances in scores for a particular criterion or vendor should be highlighted for discussion.

- **Facilitated Discussion** ▴ A neutral facilitator should lead the consensus meeting. The discussion should focus on the evidence cited by evaluators for their scores, not their feelings about the vendors. Evaluators must justify their high or low scores by referencing specific sections of the anonymized proposals.

- **Appoint a Devil’s Advocate** ▴ Designate one member of the committee to challenge the emerging consensus, forcing the team to consider alternative interpretations and justify their collective reasoning.

> A weighted scoring matrix, finalized before review, is the primary instrument for enforcing objective, strategy-aligned decision-making.

![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

## Phase 4 ▴ De-Anonymization and Final Due Diligence

Only after a provisional ranking has been established based on the anonymized content are the vendor identities revealed.

- **Vendor Identity Reveal** ▴ The collator reveals which vendor corresponds to each proposal code.

- **Finalist Selection** ▴ The top two or three highest-scoring vendors are selected as finalists.

- **Targeted Due Diligence** ▴ At this stage, factors like cultural fit, team chemistry, and customer reference checks become relevant. However, these subjective assessments are now being applied to a small group of vendors who have already proven their capabilities on an objective basis, minimizing the risk of a poor decision.

![A pristine teal sphere, representing a high-fidelity digital asset, emerges from concentric layers of a sophisticated principal's operational framework. These layers symbolize market microstructure, aggregated liquidity pools, and RFQ protocol mechanisms ensuring best execution and optimal price discovery within an institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-2.jpg)

## Phase 5 ▴ Documentation and Feedback

The final phase ensures transparency and continuous improvement.

- **Document the Decision** ▴ The final decision, including all scoring sheets and meeting notes, should be formally documented. This creates an audit trail that demonstrates a fair and structured process was followed.

- **Provide Vendor Feedback** ▴ Notify all participating vendors of the outcome. Providing unsuccessful bidders with constructive feedback on their proposal’s strengths and weaknesses (without revealing confidential information about the winner) enhances the organization’s reputation for fairness and professionalism.

By executing this disciplined, multi-phase protocol, an organization can systematically de-risk its procurement decisions. The framework forces a focus on the intrinsic merit of each proposal, ensuring that the final selection is the product of rigorous analysis, not unconscious bias. It transforms the evaluation from a subjective art into a structured science.

![An abstract visual depicts a central intelligent execution hub, symbolizing the core of a Principal's operational framework. Two intersecting planes represent multi-leg spread strategies and cross-asset liquidity pools, enabling private quotation and aggregated inquiry for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## References

- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

- Dobler, D. W. & Burt, D. N. (1996). Purchasing and Supply Management ▴ Text and Cases. McGraw-Hill.

- Schotanus, F. & Telgen, J. (2007). A Methodological Framework for the Analysis of Biases in Public Procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 7(3), 324-351.

- Davila, A. Gupta, M. & Palmer, R. (2003). Moving from a Purchasing to a Procurement Mindset. Harvard Business Review, 81(5), 18-19.

- Cox, A. (2015). Sourcing Portfolio Analysis and Power Positioning ▴ Towards a “Paradigm Shift” in Category Management and Strategic Sourcing. Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal, 20(6), 717-736.

- Bazerman, M. H. & Moore, D. A. (2012). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons.

- Flynn, A. E. & Ellram, L. M. (1994). A Review of the Literature on Purchasing and Supply Management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 30(4), 4-13.

- van Weele, A. J. (2018). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Cengage Learning.

![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

## Reflection

![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

## The Integrity of the Decision-Making System

Ultimately, the process of evaluating a Request for Proposal is a reflection of an organization’s commitment to rational decision-making. The frameworks and protocols discussed are not merely bureaucratic hurdles; they are the essential components of an operating system designed for clarity and precision. The presence of bias is not a moral failing but a systemic reality. Therefore, the challenge is an architectural one ▴ to construct a process so sound that it guides human judgment toward its most logical and value-driven conclusions.

The true measure of a successful procurement is not just the quality of the vendor selected, but the integrity of the system that selected them. This system, when properly designed and executed, becomes a strategic asset in its own right, consistently converting complex requirements into optimal partnerships and creating a durable competitive advantage.

![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

MiFID II mandates a data-driven, auditable RFQ process, transforming counterparty evaluation into a quantitative discipline to ensure best execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract layers visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Teal dome signifies optimal price discovery, high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-layers-and-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/confirmation-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A centralized intelligence layer for institutional digital asset derivatives, visually connected by translucent RFQ protocols. This Prime RFQ facilitates high-fidelity execution and private quotation for block trades, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine.jpg)

## Confirmation Bias

Meaning ▴ Confirmation Bias represents the cognitive tendency to seek, interpret, favor, and recall information in a manner that confirms one's pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses, often disregarding contradictory evidence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Halo Effect

Meaning ▴ The Halo Effect is defined as a cognitive bias where the perception of a single positive attribute of an entity or asset disproportionately influences the generalized assessment of its other, unrelated attributes, leading to an overall favorable valuation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/beyond-the-obvious-biases-like-confirmation-and-anchoring-what-are-some-less-common-biases-that-can-affect-an-rfp-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate internal machinery reveals a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Precision components, including a multi-leg spread mechanism and data flow conduits, symbolize a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating atomic settlement and robust price discovery within a principal's Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## These Biases

Systematically de-biasing an RFP committee requires architecting a process that isolates and analyzes qualitative and quantitative data independently. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/groupthink/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent, faceted sphere, representing a digital asset derivative block trade, traverses a precision-engineered track. This signifies high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol, optimizing liquidity aggregation, price discovery, and capital efficiency within institutional market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-high-fidelity-execution-protocol-prime-os-path.jpg)

## Groupthink

Meaning ▴ Groupthink defines a cognitive bias where the desire for conformity within a decision-making group suppresses independent critical thought, leading to suboptimal or irrational outcomes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/incumbent-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

## Incumbent Bias

Meaning ▴ Incumbent Bias represents a systemic predisposition within institutional trading operations to favor established market participants, execution venues, or operational protocols due to their historical presence and perceived reliability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/blind-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A glossy, teal sphere, partially open, exposes precision-engineered metallic components and white internal modules. This represents an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling secure RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery of Digital Asset Derivatives, crucial for prime brokerage and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-revealing-core-rfq-protocol-mechanisms-for-optimized-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Blind Scoring

Meaning ▴ Blind Scoring defines a structured evaluation methodology where the identity of the entity or proposal being assessed remains concealed from the evaluators until after the assessment is complete and recorded. </a>

**Tags:** [Objective Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/objective-decision-making/), [Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/), [Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Halo Effect](https://options.greeks.live/area/halo-effect/), [RFP Evaluation Bias](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-bias/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Biases an Rfp Scoring Rubric Helps to Prevent?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-biases-an-rfp-scoring-rubric-helps-to-prevent/)
![Precision-engineered system components in beige, teal, and metallic converge at a vibrant blue interface. This symbolizes a critical RFQ protocol junction within an institutional Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives. It optimizes latency and market microstructure for private quotation and block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-connectivity-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

An RFP scoring rubric prevents subjective biases by enforcing a standardized, weighted, and data-driven evaluation protocol.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Mitigate Cognitive Biases within an Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-mitigate-cognitive-biases-within-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![Intersecting teal and dark blue planes, with reflective metallic lines, depict structured pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol orchestration, and multi-venue liquidity aggregation within a Prime RFQ, reflecting precise market microstructure and optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-execution-liquidity-microstructure.jpg)

A structured, multi-stage evaluation process neutralizes inherent biases, ensuring decisions are based on evidence, not intuition.

- 
### [How Can Unclear Evaluation Criteria in an Rfp Lead to Long Term Financial Damage?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-unclear-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp-lead-to-long-term-financial-damage/)
![A futuristic, dark grey institutional platform with a glowing spherical core, embodying an intelligence layer for advanced price discovery. This Prime RFQ enables high-fidelity execution through RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives and managing liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

Unclear RFP criteria transform a tool for procurement into a system for generating long-term, unrecoverable financial liabilities.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Processes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-processes/)
![A reflective digital asset pipeline bisects a dynamic gradient, symbolizing high-fidelity RFQ execution across fragmented market microstructure. Concentric rings denote the Prime RFQ centralizing liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and managing counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-2.jpg)

Cognitive biases are systemic flaws in human judgment that can be mitigated through a robust, data-driven RFP evaluation architecture.

- 
### [How Can You Prevent Personal Bias in the Rfp Scoring Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-prevent-personal-bias-in-the-rfp-scoring-process/)
![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

A resilient RFP scoring process neutralizes personal bias through a system of objective criteria, blind evaluation, and structured moderation.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Prevent Stakeholder Bias from Influencing Rfp Scoring?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-prevent-stakeholder-bias-from-influencing-rfp-scoring/)
![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

A resilient procurement architecture mitigates bias by codifying objective, weighted criteria and executing a blind, multi-stage evaluation protocol.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Structuring an Rfp Evaluation Scorecard?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-structuring-an-rfp-evaluation-scorecard/)
![The image features layered structural elements, representing diverse liquidity pools and market segments within a Principal's operational framework. A sharp, reflective plane intersects, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery via private quotation protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing atomic settlement nodes.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-interplay-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols.jpg)

An RFP evaluation scorecard is a systemic framework for translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable, defensible procurement decision.

- 
### [What Is the Role of Cross-Functional Teams in Defining and Weighting RFP Evaluation Criteria Effectively?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-cross-functional-teams-in-defining-and-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria-effectively/)
![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

A cross-functional team transforms RFP evaluation into a system for embedding strategic priorities into a quantifiable decision model.

- 
### [How Can a Weighted Scoring Matrix Mitigate Bias in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-weighted-scoring-matrix-mitigate-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix mitigates bias by translating subjective evaluations into a quantitative, auditable, and strategically aligned system.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Most Common Types of Bias in an Rfp Evaluation Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Most Common Types of Bias in an Rfp Evaluation Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Common RFP evaluation biases are systemic flaws in judgment that can be neutralized by a robust, anonymized, and weighted scoring framework. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T17:51:56+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T17:52:07+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract image depicts a sleek, metallic, precision-engineered system with reflective surfaces and a central optical element, representing the core of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It illustrates sophisticated architecture for high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, facilitating block trade and multi-leg spread strategies. The design emphasizes optimal price discovery within fragmented liquidity pools, ensuring capital efficiency and mitigating adverse selection. This robust framework supports prime brokerage operations, enhancing best execution for digital asset derivatives."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Blind Scoring",
        "Cognitive Bias in Procurement",
        "Confirmation Bias",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Groupthink",
        "Halo Effect",
        "Incumbent Bias",
        "Objective Decision Making",
        "Procurement Process",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Bias",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring Matrix"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/
