# What Are the Most Critical Criteria to Include in an Rfp Scoring Model? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A layered, cream and dark blue structure with a transparent angular screen. This abstract visual embodies an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for high-fidelity RFQ execution, enabling deep liquidity aggregation and real-time risk management for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-structure-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

![Intricate metallic components signify system precision engineering. These structured elements symbolize institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-engineering-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-latency-optimization.jpg)

## Concept

An [RFP scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the central nervous system of a disciplined [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It translates an organization’s strategic imperatives into a quantifiable, defensible decision-making framework. The system moves the selection process from subjective preference to an objective, data-driven evaluation.

Its purpose is to ensure that the chosen vendor, solution, or partner aligns with a holistic set of business goals, extending far beyond the immediate features or the initial price point. A properly constructed model serves as an analytical engine, forcing clarity on what truly matters and providing a transparent rationale for high-stakes acquisition decisions.

The structural integrity of this model depends entirely on the criteria selected for evaluation. These criteria are the inputs that determine the quality of the output. They represent the fundamental questions the organization must ask of its potential partners. Criticality is not defined by a universal checklist but is derived from the specific context of the procurement ▴ the nature of the project, the level of risk involved, the long-term strategic goals, and the internal capabilities of the organization.

Therefore, the initial act of defining the scoring criteria is the most strategic phase of the entire RFP process. It is an exercise in corporate self-awareness before it becomes an assessment of external vendors.

> A well-architected scoring model transforms procurement from a cost-centric function into a value-generation engine for the entire enterprise.

![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## The Foundation of Objective Evaluation

At its core, the [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is an antidote to the cognitive biases that can derail a selection process. It mitigates the risk of being swayed by a charismatic presentation, an incumbent relationship, or an attractive but ultimately superficial feature. By pre-defining and weighting criteria before proposals are even opened, the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) commits to a consistent standard of judgment. This disciplined approach ensures that every vendor is measured against the same yardstick, fostering a fair and transparent competition that encourages higher-quality submissions. 

The criteria chosen must be both comprehensive and mutually exclusive to avoid ambiguity and double-counting. They fall into several broad, yet distinct, domains of inquiry. These domains collectively create a multi-dimensional view of a vendor’s proposal, allowing the evaluation team to assess not just the “what” (the solution) and the “how much” (the price), but also the “how” (the approach), the “who” (the team), and the “what if” (the risks).

![A sleek, multi-component system, predominantly dark blue, features a cylindrical sensor with a central lens. This precision-engineered module embodies an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure observation, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure.jpg)

![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic [RFP scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model requires a deliberate process of aligning [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) with overarching business objectives. The selection of criteria is a strategic exercise that defines the very definition of success for the procurement project. A common failure is to adopt a generic template without tailoring it to the specific needs of the organization.

The most effective models are bespoke, reflecting the unique risk appetite, operational priorities, and strategic vision of the company. This process begins with intensive internal consultation, engaging all stakeholders who will be impacted by the vendor’s performance, from the end-users of a software platform to the finance team managing the budget.

![Modular circuit panels, two with teal traces, converge around a central metallic anchor. This symbolizes core architecture for institutional digital asset derivatives, representing a Principal's Prime RFQ framework, enabling high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-prime-os.jpg)

## Aligning Criteria with Strategic Imperatives

The weighting of each criterion is where the strategy becomes quantified. An unweighted or poorly weighted model can lead to a suboptimal outcome, even with a comprehensive list of criteria. If, for instance, long-term technical support and scalability are the primary strategic concerns for a new software implementation, these criteria must carry a proportionally higher weight than the initial implementation cost.

Conversely, for a commoditized service where providers are largely undifferentiated, price may justifiably become the most heavily weighted factor. The weighting process forces a candid conversation among stakeholders about priorities and trade-offs, forging a consensus on what constitutes the “best value” for the organization.

> The strategic weighting of scoring criteria is the mechanism that translates organizational priorities into a mathematical mandate for vendor selection.

The following table illustrates a strategic framework for categorizing and considering potential criteria. The specific items and their weights would be adapted for each unique RFP.

### Strategic Criteria Categories

| Category | Description | Illustrative Criteria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Technical and Functional Fit | Evaluates the core capabilities of the proposed solution or service against the stated requirements. This is the measure of the solution’s ability to perform the necessary tasks. | Compliance with mandatory specifications, scalability, ease of integration, user interface design, performance metrics. |
| Vendor Viability and Experience | Assesses the provider’s stability, track record, and expertise. This category looks beyond the proposal to the organization behind it. | Financial stability, years in business, relevant case studies, client references, staff qualifications and tenure. |
| Cost and Commercial Terms | Analyzes the total cost of ownership, not just the upfront price. This includes all direct and indirect costs over the life of the contract. | Pricing structure, implementation fees, licensing or subscription costs, support fees, payment terms, contract flexibility. |
| Service and Support Model | Examines the vendor’s commitment to post-implementation success and ongoing partnership. This is critical for long-term or complex solutions. | Service Level Agreements (SLAs), dedicated support team, issue resolution process, training and onboarding programs. |
| Risk and Compliance | Measures the vendor’s approach to mitigating risk and adhering to regulatory and security standards. | Data security protocols, disaster recovery plans, regulatory compliance certifications, insurance coverage. |

![A precise RFQ engine extends into an institutional digital asset liquidity pool, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and advanced price discovery within complex market microstructure. This embodies a Principal's operational framework for multi-leg spread strategies and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-interfacing-core-liquidity-system.jpg)

## Weighting Methodologies

The method for assigning weights is a critical strategic choice. A simple approach might use a 1-5 scale for importance, while more sophisticated models use a “forced ranking” or “paired comparison” method to create a more granular distribution of weights. The key is to ensure the methodology is understood and agreed upon by the evaluation committee before the scoring begins. This prevents disagreements during the evaluation phase and reinforces the objectivity of the final decision.

- **Fixed Point System** ▴ The committee allocates a total of, for example, 100 points across all criteria. This forces a direct trade-off, as assigning more points to one area necessitates fewer points in another. 

- **Categorical Weighting** ▴ Major categories (like the ones in the table above) are assigned a high-level weight, and then the criteria within each category are weighted relative to each other. This provides a hierarchical structure to the evaluation.

- **Stakeholder Input** ▴ A survey or workshop can be used to gather input from a wider group of stakeholders on the relative importance of different criteria, with the results being averaged to create the final weights.

![Luminous teal indicator on a water-speckled digital asset interface. This signifies high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading navigating market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-best-execution-prime-os.jpg)

![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase transforms the strategic framework of the RFP scoring model into a functional, operational tool. This is where the abstract concepts of criteria and weights are applied to the concrete details of vendor proposals. A rigorous and disciplined execution process is essential to maintain the integrity of the evaluation and produce a defensible, data-supported selection. The process must be managed with precision, ensuring every evaluator understands their role, the scoring mechanics, and the importance of adhering to the pre-defined system without deviation.

![Metallic, reflective components depict high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. A central circular element symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivative, like a Bitcoin option, processed via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

Executing a scoring model is a multi-step process that demands careful management from the procurement lead or evaluation committee chair. The following steps provide a high-level operational sequence for implementing the scoring model effectively.

- **Finalize the Evaluation Committee** ▴ Before the RFP is released, the committee must be formed. It should consist of an odd number of individuals (typically 3 or more) representing the key stakeholder groups. 

- **Develop the Scoring Guide** ▴ Create a detailed guide that defines each criterion, explains the scoring scale (e.g. 1-5, where 1=Does Not Meet Requirement and 5=Exceeds Requirement), and provides examples of what constitutes a high or low score for each item. This ensures all evaluators are calibrated and scoring consistently. 

- **Conduct an Initial Compliance Review** ▴ Upon receipt of proposals, perform a pass/fail check to ensure all mandatory requirements have been met (e.g. submission deadline, required forms). Non-compliant proposals are typically eliminated at this stage. 

- **Individual Scoring Rounds** ▴ Each evaluator independently scores every proposal against the criteria. It is critical that this initial scoring is done without conferring with other committee members to avoid groupthink.

- **Facilitate a Consensus Meeting** ▴ The committee convenes to discuss the scores. The facilitator’s role is to identify areas of significant scoring divergence and guide a discussion to understand the reasoning behind the different scores. Evaluators should be allowed to adjust their scores based on the discussion, provided they can offer a clear rationale.

- **Calculate Final [Weighted Scores](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-reversion-scores-change-for-different-algorithmic-trading-strategies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Once consensus is reached or individual scores are finalized, the final weighted scores are calculated for each vendor. This provides the quantitative ranking that informs the final decision.

![A precision optical system with a reflective lens embodies the Prime RFQ intelligence layer. Gray and green planes represent divergent RFQ protocols or multi-leg spread strategies for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligent-core-driving-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools-for-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The heart of the execution phase is the quantitative analysis. A [scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), often built in a spreadsheet, is the primary tool for this analysis. It aggregates the scores from all evaluators and applies the pre-defined weights to generate a final, objective ranking. This model removes emotion and personal bias from the final stages of the decision, grounding it in the collective judgment of the committee as captured by the data.

> The scoring matrix is the crucible where subjective expert opinion is forged into objective, quantifiable data for decision-making.

The table below provides a simplified example of a weighted scoring matrix in action, demonstrating how the final scores are calculated.

### Sample Weighted Scoring Matrix

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Vendor A Score (Avg) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (Avg) | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution Fit | 30% | 4.5 | 1.35 | 3.8 | 1.14 |
| Implementation Plan & Timeline | 15% | 4.0 | 0.60 | 4.2 | 0.63 |
| Vendor Experience & References | 15% | 4.8 | 0.72 | 4.5 | 0.68 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | 25% | 3.5 | 0.88 | 4.5 | 1.13 |
| Data Security & Compliance | 15% | 5.0 | 0.75 | 4.0 | 0.60 |
| Total | 100% | | 4.30 | | 4.18 |

In this model, the formula for the [weighted score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-consistency-when-multiple-evaluators-score-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for each criterion is ▴ (Weight) x (Average Score). The final score is the sum of the weighted scores. This analysis reveals that while Vendor B offered a more competitive cost, Vendor A’s superior [technical solution](https://prime.greeks.live/guide/why-your-options-fills-are-costing-you-the-rfq-solution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and security protocols resulted in a higher overall weighted score, making it the recommended choice based on the organization’s stated priorities.

![Beige and teal angular modular components precisely connect on black, symbolizing critical system integration for a Principal's operational framework. This represents seamless interoperability within a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution, efficient price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-os-interop.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

Consider a mid-sized manufacturing company seeking a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The evaluation committee, comprising the CFO, the Head of Operations, and the IT Director, has defined its criteria. Technical fit and scalability are weighted heavily (40%), as their current system is failing to keep up with growth.

[Total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO) is also significant (30%), but implementation support and vendor viability make up the remaining 30%. They receive three proposals.

Vendor Alpha is a large, established player with a powerful but complex system. Their score on vendor viability is a perfect 5/5, and [their technical solution](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-verify-the-claims-a-vendor-makes-in-their-rfp-response-regarding-technical-capabilities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) scores a 4/5. Their implementation support is seen as rigid (3/5), and their TCO is the highest, leading to a score of 2/5 on cost.

Vendor Beta is a newer, more agile company with a highly intuitive and modern platform. Their technical solution is rated a 5/5. However, their smaller size and shorter track record result in a 3/5 for viability. Their implementation team is highly praised by references (5/5), and their TCO is moderate (4/5).

Vendor Gamma competes almost entirely on price. Their TCO score is a 5/5. Their technical solution, however, is seen as lacking in key areas (2/5), their viability is a concern (3/5), and their support model is purely reactive (2/5).

When the weighted scores are calculated, Vendor Beta emerges as the winner. Although Vendor Alpha had superior viability and Vendor Gamma had the lowest cost, Vendor Beta’s combination of a top-rated technical solution and excellent implementation support, aligned with the committee’s heavily weighted priorities, gave them the highest overall score. The model allowed the committee to look past the “safe” choice of the large incumbent and the “cheap” choice of the budget provider to identify the vendor that offered the best holistic value according to their pre-defined strategic needs.

![A prominent domed optic with a teal-blue ring and gold bezel. This visual metaphor represents an institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ interface, providing high-fidelity execution for price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-optic-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-and-high-fidelity-price-discovery.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

The RFP scoring model itself is a system that must be integrated into the organization’s broader technological and procedural architecture. For most organizations, the model is built and managed within a standard spreadsheet application. This approach is flexible and accessible. However, for organizations with high-volume or highly complex procurement needs, dedicated e-procurement software platforms offer a more robust solution.

These platforms can automate the collection of proposals, manage evaluator scoring through a centralized portal, and automatically calculate weighted scores. This reduces administrative overhead and enhances the auditability of the process. Regardless of the technology used, the output of the scoring model must feed into the subsequent stages of the procurement process, such as contract negotiation and vendor onboarding, providing a clear data trail that justifies the selection decision.

![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

## References

- “RFP Evaluation Criteria to Consider in 2025.” Procurement Tactics, 2024.

- “RFP Evaluating Criteria.” The George Washington University, Finance Division, Procurement Department. Accessed August 2, 2025.

- “Understanding Evaluation Criteria ▴ A Guide to Scoring High on RFPs.” Hudson Bid Writers, 7 April 2025.

- Multnomah Group. “RFP Scoring Criteria ▴ Part 1.” 2 December 2020.

- “RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Everything You Need to Know.” Euna Solutions. Accessed August 2, 2025.

- Schotanus, Fredo, and J. Telgen. “A Methodological Framework for the ‘Best Value’ Quest.” Journal of Public Procurement, vol. 7, no. 1, 2007, pp. 69-96.

- Bhutta, Khurrum S. and Faizul Huq. “Supplier selection problem ▴ a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process.” Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, 2002, pp. 126-135.

- Talluri, Srinivas, and Ram Narasimhan. “A methodology for strategic sourcing.” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 154, no. 1, 2004, pp. 236-250.

![Sleek, metallic, modular hardware with visible circuit elements, symbolizing the market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. This low-latency infrastructure supports RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution for private quotation and block trade settlement, ensuring capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/market-microstructure-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek device showcases a rotating translucent teal disc, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and volatility surface visualization within an RFQ protocol. Its numerical display suggests a quantitative pricing engine facilitating algorithmic execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-for-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-with-smart-liquidity-routing.jpg)

## From Selection Tool to Strategic Asset

Ultimately, a Request for Proposal scoring model transcends its function as a simple evaluation tool. It becomes a repository of institutional knowledge and a mechanism for continuous strategic improvement. Each RFP cycle, from the definition of criteria to the final scoring, is an opportunity to refine the organization’s understanding of its own needs and the evolving capabilities of the market. The data generated does not expire upon contract signing; it serves as a benchmark for future procurements and a performance baseline against which to measure the chosen vendor’s success over the long term.

Viewing the scoring model as a strategic asset encourages a more dynamic approach. It prompts ongoing questions ▴ Did the criteria from our last major software procurement accurately predict performance? How should the weighting of data security change in response to new regulatory landscapes?

By analyzing the outcomes of past decisions against the models that produced them, an organization can sharpen its procurement intelligence. The framework ceases to be a static checklist and evolves into a learning system, an integral part of an operational architecture designed not just to make better decisions, but to build a more resilient and competitive enterprise.

![Precision-engineered components of an institutional-grade system. The metallic teal housing and visible geared mechanism symbolize the core algorithmic execution engine for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-layer.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, split capsule object reveals an internal glowing teal light connecting its two halves, symbolizing a secure, high-fidelity RFQ protocol facilitating atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents the precise execution of multi-leg spread strategies within a principal's operational framework, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-2.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting multi-asset liquidity channels with an embedded intelligence layer define this precision-engineered framework. It symbolizes advanced institutional digital asset RFQ protocols, visualizing sophisticated market microstructure for high-fidelity execution, mitigating counterparty risk and enabling atomic settlement across crypto derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ An RFP Scoring Model constitutes a structured, quantitative framework engineered for the systematic evaluation of responses to a Request for Proposal, particularly concerning complex institutional services such as digital asset derivatives platforms or prime brokerage solutions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract composition features two intersecting, sharp-edged planes—one dark, one light—representing distinct liquidity pools or multi-leg spreads. Translucent spherical elements, symbolizing digital asset derivatives and price discovery, balance on this intersection, reflecting complex market microstructure and optimal RFQ protocol execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished metallic control knob with a deep blue, reflective digital surface, embodying high-fidelity execution within an institutional grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This interface facilitates RFQ Request for Quote initiation for block trades, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-control-system-interface.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Model represents a structured quantitative framework designed to assign a numerical value or rank to an entity, such as a digital asset, counterparty, or transaction, based on a predefined set of weighted criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated modular component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, featuring an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Its precision engineering facilitates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency for institutional participants](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-module.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An angled precision mechanism with layered components, including a blue base and green lever arm, symbolizes Institutional Grade Market Microstructure. It represents High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling advanced RFQ protocols, Price Discovery, and Liquidity Pool aggregation within a Prime RFQ for Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-system-microstructure-components.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring

Meaning ▴ RFP Scoring defines the structured, quantitative methodology employed to evaluate and rank vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal, particularly for complex technology and service procurements within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-reversion-scores-change-for-different-algorithmic-trading-strategies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An exploded view reveals the precision engineering of an institutional digital asset derivatives trading platform, showcasing layered components for high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocol management. This architecture facilitates aggregated liquidity, optimal price discovery, and robust portfolio margin calculations, minimizing slippage and counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## Weighted Scores

The weighting of reversion scores must adapt to strategy, time horizon, and market regime to optimize signal fidelity and manage risk. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, dark metallic surface features a cylindrical module with a luminous blue top, embodying a Prime RFQ control for RFQ protocol initiation. This institutional-grade interface enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives block trades, ensuring private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A scoring matrix is a computational construct assigning quantitative values to inputs within automated decision frameworks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/guide/why-your-options-fills-are-costing-you-the-rfq-solution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central dark aperture, like a precision matching engine, anchors four intersecting algorithmic pathways. Light-toned planes represent transparent liquidity pools, contrasting with dark teal sections signifying dark pool or latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-9.jpg)

## Technical Solution

Stop losing your edge to slippage; command professional-grade liquidity and pricing with the RFQ system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-consistency-when-multiple-evaluators-score-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract metallic components, resembling an advanced Prime RFQ mechanism, precisely frame a teal sphere, symbolizing a liquidity pool. This depicts the market microstructure supporting RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring capital efficiency in algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-driving-rfq-protocol-execution-and-capital-efficiency-optimization.jpg)

## Weighted Score

An organization ensures RFP scoring consistency by deploying a weighted rubric with defined scales and running a calibration protocol for all evaluators. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, spherical intelligence layer component with internal blue mechanics and a precision lens. It embodies a Principal's private quotation system, driving high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives through RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and minimizing latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-private-quotation-system-intelligence-layer-component.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-verify-the-claims-a-vendor-makes-in-their-rfp-response-regarding-technical-capabilities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A specialized hardware component, showcasing a robust metallic heat sink and intricate circuit board, symbolizes a Prime RFQ dedicated hardware module for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-dedicated-hardware-for-institutional-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Their Technical Solution

Verify vendor RFP claims by architecting a multi-layered validation process that moves from document analysis to live, hostile testing. </a>

**Tags:** [Total Cost](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost/), [Quantitative Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/quantitative-decision-making/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/), [Supplier Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-selection/), [RFP Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-model/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Create a Weighted Scoring Model to Align Technical and Financial Evaluation Criteria in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-a-weighted-scoring-model-to-align-technical-and-financial-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/)
![A segmented circular diagram, split diagonally. Its core, with blue rings, represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer driving High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Outer segments denote RFQ protocols and order flow pathways, reflecting Market Microstructure for Private Quotation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-speed-prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution.jpg)

A weighted scoring model is a system for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Bottlenecks in an Rfp Process and How Can Metrics Help Identify Them?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-bottlenecks-in-an-rfp-process-and-how-can-metrics-help-identify-them/)
![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

The RFP's primary bottlenecks—ambiguity, latency, and subjectivity—are best identified by metrics tracking vendor questions, cycle times, and evaluation variance.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls When Assigning Weights to Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-when-assigning-weights-to-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![Sleek, domed institutional-grade interface with glowing green and blue indicators highlights active RFQ protocols and price discovery. This signifies high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, ensuring real-time liquidity and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg)

Assigning weights to RFP criteria is a control system for translating strategic intent into a quantifiable, defensible procurement decision.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks Associated with an Overly Aggressive Cost-Focused RFP Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-associated-with-an-overly-aggressive-cost-focused-rfp-evaluation/)
![Institutional-grade infrastructure supports a translucent circular interface, displaying real-time market microstructure for digital asset derivatives price discovery. Geometric forms symbolize precise RFQ protocol execution, enabling high-fidelity multi-leg spread trading, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating systemic risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-intelligence-layer.jpg)

An overly cost-focused RFP evaluation systemically corrupts the procurement process, ensuring the selection of a compromised, low-value partner.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Ways to Structure an Objective Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-ways-to-structure-an-objective-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A blue speckled marble, symbolizing a precise block trade, rests centrally on a translucent bar, representing a robust RFQ protocol. This structured geometric arrangement illustrates complex market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient liquidity aggregation within a principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-across-complex-market-microstructure.jpg)

A structured RFP evaluation process translates complex vendor proposals into a standardized, data-driven framework for objective decision-making.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Ways to Structure a Multi-Stage Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-ways-to-structure-a-multi-stage-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![The abstract composition features a central, multi-layered blue structure representing a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform, flanked by two distinct liquidity pools. Intersecting blades symbolize high-fidelity execution pathways and algorithmic trading strategies, facilitating private quotation and block trade settlement within a market microstructure optimized for price discovery and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

A multi-stage RFP evaluation is a system for deconstructing complex procurement decisions into a sequence of objective, data-driven gates.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Setting Weights for Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-setting-weights-for-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool. This depicts high-fidelity execution of block trades through RFQ protocols in complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

A robust RFP evaluation system translates strategic intent into a defensible decision by weighting criteria to reflect true value over initial cost.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid in a Negotiated Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-in-a-negotiated-rfp/)
![Geometric panels, light and dark, interlocked by a luminous diagonal, depict an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Central nodes symbolize liquidity aggregation and price discovery within a Principal's execution management system, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-1.jpg)

A negotiated RFP's integrity hinges on its design as a system for partner integration, not merely a procurement tool.

- 
### [In What Ways Does a Multi-Stage Rfp Process Help to Reveal More Accurate Vendor Information?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-does-a-multi-stage-rfp-process-help-to-reveal-more-accurate-vendor-information/)
![Two distinct, polished spherical halves, beige and teal, reveal intricate internal market microstructure, connected by a central metallic shaft. This embodies an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across disparate liquidity pools for principal block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os.jpg)

A multi-stage RFP is a system for dismantling information asymmetry and converting vendor claims into verified capabilities.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Most Critical Criteria to Include in an Rfp Scoring Model?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-criteria-to-include-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-criteria-to-include-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Most Critical Criteria to Include in an Rfp Scoring Model? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An RFP scoring model is a decision-making system that quantifies strategic priorities to objectively select the highest-value vendor. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-criteria-to-include-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T18:32:11+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T18:32:13+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract composition articulates institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Integrated system components, precisely aligned, embody a Principal's operational framework for RFQ protocol execution. Circular elements symbolize critical market data feeds and advanced price discovery capabilities. The sharp, curved feature represents high-fidelity execution, liquidity provision, and strategic multi-leg spread trading, ensuring capital efficiency within a robust Prime RFQ."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Procurement Management",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Quantitative Decision Making",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "Risk and Compliance",
        "Scoring Matrix",
        "Scoring Model",
        "Service Level Agreements",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Evaluation",
        "Weighted Criteria"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-criteria-to-include-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/
