# What Are the Primary Conflicts of Interest Inherent in a Systematic Internaliser Model? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-07-30
**Categories:** Question

---

![Two sleek, abstract forms, one dark, one light, are precisely stacked, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional trading system. This embodies sophisticated RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and optimal liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives, ensuring robust market microstructure and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-high-fidelity-execution-protocols-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A precise metallic instrument, resembling an algorithmic trading probe or a multi-leg spread representation, passes through a transparent RFQ protocol gateway. This illustrates high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-orchestration-of-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The architecture of modern financial markets presents a series of solutions to the fundamental problem of liquidity. At its core, a [Systematic Internaliser](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systematic-internaliser/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SI) represents a specific and powerful answer to this challenge. An SI is an investment firm that uses its own capital to execute client orders, functioning as a private, bilateral trading venue. This model was formalized and expanded under the MiFID II regulatory framework to bring a degree of transparency and order to the vast [over-the-counter](https://prime.greeks.live/area/over-the-counter/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (OTC) markets.

The core function is for the firm to deal on its own account on an organized, frequent, and substantial basis. This means that for certain assets, when a client submits an order, the firm provides the execution itself, becoming the direct counterparty to the trade instead of routing the order to a [public exchange](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-regulatory-and-compliance-frameworks-govern-the-use-of-rfq-protocols-in-cross-exchange-trading/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) or multilateral trading facility (MTF).

This structure is a direct consequence of the market’s need for mechanisms to handle large or sensitive orders without causing significant price disruption, known as [market impact](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-impact/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). By internalizing flow, an SI offers a path to execution away from the continuous double auction model of a lit exchange. The central tension, and the origin of all subsequent conflicts, is embedded in this foundational design. The SI operates in a dual capacity.

It serves as an agent, tasked with fulfilling a client’s order under the principle of [best execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Simultaneously, it acts as a principal, a proprietary trader whose objective is to generate profit from the bid-ask spread on the transaction. This duality is the system’s primary feature and its primary point of friction. The entire regulatory apparatus around SIs is an attempt to manage the delicate balance between harnessing their liquidity benefits and mitigating the inherent conflicts that arise from this dual role.

> A Systematic Internaliser functions as a private liquidity source, executing client orders with its own capital, which creates a core conflict between serving the client and maximizing its own trading profit.

Understanding the SI model requires viewing it as a specific node within a broader network of liquidity pools. Its existence acknowledges that a single, centralized market structure is insufficient for the diverse needs of all participants. For an institutional client, the SI offers the potential for discreet, high-volume execution. For the firm operating the SI, it provides a valuable stream of client [order flow](https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-flow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), which is both a source of revenue through spread capture and a rich source of market information.

The conflicts of interest are not a flaw in the system; they are an intrinsic property of its architecture, a direct trade-off for the specific type of liquidity it provides. The critical challenge for both regulators and market participants is to architect a framework of interaction that allows for the benefits of internalization while imposing sufficient transparency and best-execution discipline to keep these conflicts in check.

![Precisely engineered circular beige, grey, and blue modules stack tilted on a dark base. A central aperture signifies the core RFQ protocol engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-prime-os-rfq-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-execution.jpg)

## The Genesis of the Systematic Internaliser

The SI regime under [MiFID II](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) was not created in a vacuum. It was a direct regulatory response to the increasing volume of trading occurring in opaque, off-exchange environments. Before its implementation, a significant portion of equity and bond trading took place in so-called “dark pools” or through other bilateral OTC arrangements, which offered minimal pre-trade or post-trade transparency.

This lack of visibility raised concerns among regulators about the fairness and efficiency of the [price discovery](https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-discovery/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process across the broader market. If a large amount of trading happens away from public view, the prices displayed on lit exchanges may not reflect the true supply and demand, undermining the integrity of the market as a whole.

The SI framework was designed to bring these internalization activities into a more structured and regulated environment. The regulation compels investment firms that trade OTC beyond certain quantitative thresholds to register as SIs for specific instruments. Once designated as an SI, the firm must adhere to specific obligations, most notably the requirement to provide firm quotes to clients upon request for liquid instruments. This quoting obligation is the central mechanism for injecting transparency into the process.

It forces the SI to stand by a price, making its liquidity tangible and accessible, at least to its client base. The goal was to formalize the process of internalization, ensuring that while it happens off-exchange, it still contributes to a more transparent market ecosystem. The SI model, therefore, represents a compromise between the institutional demand for off-exchange execution and the regulatory imperative for market transparency.

![A beige Prime RFQ chassis features a glowing teal transparent panel, symbolizing an Intelligence Layer for high-fidelity execution. A clear tube, representing a private quotation channel, holds a precise instrument for algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## How Does an SI Differ from a Public Exchange?

A public exchange, or [lit market](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lit-market/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), operates on a multilateral basis. It brings together orders from many different buyers and sellers through a [central limit order book](https://prime.greeks.live/area/central-limit-order-book/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CLOB). Price is determined through a continuous double auction process where orders are matched based on price and time priority. This system is designed for maximum transparency and democratic access; all participants can see the bids and offers available at any given moment.

An SI, conversely, operates on a bilateral basis. It does not operate a multilateral system. The “venue” is the SI’s own [trading desk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/trading-desk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and the counterparty to every client trade is the SI itself. This fundamental structural difference leads to a cascade of operational distinctions.

- **Price Discovery**. On an exchange, price discovery is a collective, public process. In an SI, price discovery is a private negotiation, even if it is governed by quoting obligations. The price a client receives is determined by the SI, based on its view of the market and its desired profit margin.

- **Anonymity**. Trading on a lit market is typically anonymous pre-trade. Participants see orders, not the identity of the firms behind them. Trading with an SI is inherently non-anonymous; the client knows they are trading with the SI, and the SI certainly knows the identity of the client.

- **Counterparty Risk**. In an exchange-traded environment, counterparty risk is mitigated by a central clearing house (CCP), which guarantees the settlement of trades. In a bilateral trade with an SI, the client is directly exposed to the creditworthiness of the SI firm, and vice versa.

These differences highlight why both systems coexist. The public exchange offers robust, transparent price discovery for standardized, liquid assets. The SI offers a discreet, relationship-based execution service that can be tailored to specific client needs, particularly for trades that might be too large or complex for the central limit order book to absorb efficiently.

![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

![A central, multi-layered cylindrical component rests on a highly reflective surface. This core quantitative analytics engine facilitates high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-optimization.jpg)

## Strategy

The primary conflicts of interest within a Systematic Internaliser model are not subtle side effects; they are fundamental to its business logic. The strategic challenge for any institution interacting with an SI is to develop a framework for engagement that actively identifies, measures, and mitigates these conflicts. The core tension arises because the SI is a profit-seeking principal, trading for its own account, while simultaneously fulfilling a client’s order. This duality creates a strategic landscape where the client’s goal of best execution and the SI’s goal of profit maximization are in direct opposition.

![A glowing green ring encircles a dark, reflective sphere, symbolizing a principal's intelligence layer for high-fidelity RFQ execution. It reflects intricate market microstructure, signifying precise algorithmic trading for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and managing latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-hub.jpg)

## Information Asymmetry the SI’s Core Advantage

The most significant conflict stems from the SI’s privileged access to information. An SI has a perfect, real-time view of the order flow from its clients. This is not just raw data; it is intelligent, actionable information about the trading intentions of other market participants.

The SI knows which institutions are buying, which are selling, the specific instruments they are trading, and the size and urgency of their orders. This information is immensely valuable and creates a profound [information asymmetry](https://prime.greeks.live/area/information-asymmetry/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) between the SI and the rest of the market, including its own clients.

This advantage can manifest in several ways:

- **Proprietary Trading Strategy**. The SI can use the information gleaned from client order flow to inform its own proprietary trading decisions. For example, if the SI observes persistent, large-scale buying interest in a particular stock from multiple clients, it can infer that there is upward pressure on the price. The SI’s proprietary trading desk could then take a long position in that stock, anticipating a price rise. This action is taken based on non-public information derived from its clients’ trading activity.

- **Spread Optimization**. The SI can dynamically adjust the bid-ask spread it offers to clients based on its knowledge of their trading style and urgency. A client that is known to be a less price-sensitive, “must-execute” buyer may be quoted a wider spread than a more sophisticated client that is likely to shop its order around to multiple venues. This is a form of price discrimination, enabled by the information the SI holds on its clients.

- **Risk Management**. While managing risk is a legitimate business function, the way an SI manages its inventory risk can be in conflict with a client’s interests. If an SI takes on a large position from a client, it will need to hedge or offload that risk. The SI’s hedging activities, which are informed by the knowledge of the client’s initial trade, can create market impact that moves the price against the very client the SI just serviced.

![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## The Best Execution Conundrum

Under MiFID II, all investment firms have an obligation to take all sufficient steps to obtain the best possible result for their clients, a principle known as “best execution.” For an SI, this creates a direct and quantifiable conflict. The SI has a powerful incentive to internalize every order it receives because that is how it generates revenue. Each internalized trade represents a spread captured.

However, the best price for the client may exist on a different venue at the moment the order is received. The conflict is whether the SI will prioritize its own profit by executing the trade internally or prioritize the client’s best interest by routing the order to the venue offering a better price.

> The obligation of best execution directly clashes with the SI’s primary revenue model, which incentivizes internalizing order flow rather than seeking superior prices on external markets.

This conflict is most acute in fast-moving, fragmented markets where prices across different venues can flicker in and out of alignment. An SI might offer a price that is “good enough” to satisfy a basic interpretation of best execution, for example, by matching the current best bid or offer on the primary exchange (the NBBO). However, a better price might have been available on a different MTF, or a larger size might have been available at the NBBO price with lower market impact. The SI is not obligated to provide the absolute best possible price across all possible venues, only to take “sufficient steps.” This ambiguity provides the SI with considerable discretion, and its financial incentive will always pull in the direction of internalization.

![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

## How Can This Conflict Be Quantified?

The cost of this conflict can be measured through rigorous [Transaction Cost Analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCA). A buy-side firm can compare the [execution price](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-institutions-differentiate-between-price-reversion-and-trading-along-a-genuine-price-trend/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) received from an SI against a variety of benchmarks to assess the quality of execution. The table below illustrates a simplified TCA report for a series of trades executed via an SI.

| Trade ID | Instrument | Side | Quantity | Execution Price | NBBO Midpoint at Arrival | Cost vs. Arrival (bps) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| T001 | VOD.L | Buy | 100,000 | 102.5p | 102.4p | -10 bps |
| T002 | AZN.L | Sell | 50,000 | 8450.0p | 8452.0p | +20 bps |
| T003 | HSBA.L | Buy | 250,000 | 430.1p | 430.0p | -10 bps |
| T004 | BP.L | Sell | 500,000 | 310.5p | 310.8p | +30 bps |

In this analysis, a negative “Cost vs. Arrival” indicates the trade was executed at a price better than the midpoint of the market when the order was received (price improvement), while a positive value indicates a cost (slippage). The analysis shows that while the SI sometimes provides price improvement (T001, T003), it also can result in significant slippage (T002, T004). This quantitative approach is essential for a buy-side firm to hold its SI counterparties accountable and to make informed decisions about where to route its orders.

![A glossy, segmented sphere with a luminous blue 'X' core represents a Principal's Prime RFQ. It highlights multi-dealer RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, signifying unified liquidity pools, market microstructure, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-core-for-best-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

## The Illusion of Non-Discriminatory Quoting

MiFID II requires SIs to provide quotes to their clients on a non-discriminatory basis. This rule is intended to ensure a level playing field and prevent SIs from unfairly favoring certain clients over others. However, the phrase “non-discriminatory” is open to interpretation and allows for significant flexibility in practice. SIs are permitted to have different commercial policies for different types of clients, as long as these policies are applied consistently.

This creates a situation where discrimination is effectively permitted, as long as it is systematized. An SI can create different client tiers, each with its own service level and pricing schedule. For example:

- **Tier 1 Valued Clients**. These might be large, long-only asset managers whose order flow is considered “non-toxic” or “uninformed.” This means their trades are typically driven by long-term investment theses rather than short-term alpha signals. This type of flow is highly desirable for an SI to trade against, as it carries low adverse selection risk. These clients might receive the tightest spreads and the best service.

- **Tier 2 Standard Clients**. This could include a broader range of institutional clients whose flow is more mixed. They might receive standard pricing that is competitive but not as aggressive as Tier 1.

- **Tier 3 Toxic Flow**. This category would include clients that the SI identifies as having highly informed, predatory trading strategies, such as certain types of high-frequency trading firms. The SI’s goal is to avoid trading with these clients whenever possible. They might be shown very wide spreads, be subject to last-look delays, or be rejected from the platform altogether.

This tiered system is a clear [conflict of interest](https://prime.greeks.live/area/conflict-of-interest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The SI is not providing a single, unified market to all participants. It is creating a fragmented, private market where the quality of execution a client receives depends on how the SI profiles them. The conflict lies in the fact that the SI is making these judgments based on its own profitability criteria, which may not align with the client’s right to fair and open access to liquidity.

![A precision-engineered blue mechanism, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution engine, emerges from a rounded, light-colored liquidity pool component, encased within a sleek teal institutional-grade shell. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, demonstrating algorithmic trading logic and smart order routing for block trades via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-core-algorithmic-execution-engine.jpg)

![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives execution platform showcases its core market microstructure. A speckled surface depicts real-time market data streams](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

Executing trades within a market structure defined by Systematic Internalisers requires a sophisticated and data-driven approach. The inherent conflicts of the SI model necessitate a proactive and vigilant execution strategy from the buy-side. An institution cannot simply send orders to an SI and assume that best execution is being achieved.

Instead, it must build a robust operational framework for managing SI relationships, monitoring their performance, and mitigating the costs of their inherent conflicts. This involves a combination of quantitative analysis, technological integration, and strategic decision-making.

![A dark, precision-engineered core system, with metallic rings and an active segment, represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent, faceted shaft symbolizes high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, real-time price discovery, and atomic settlement, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## An Operational Playbook for SI Engagement

For a buy-side trading desk, interacting with SIs should be governed by a clear and rigorous playbook. This playbook should be designed to enforce discipline and to ensure that all routing decisions are based on empirical evidence, not just on historical relationships. The following steps provide a framework for such a playbook:

- **Pre-Trade Analysis and Venue Selection**. Before an order is sent to any single venue, it should be analyzed by a smart order router (SOR). The SOR should be configured to check the prices available on all potential execution venues, including lit markets, MTFs, and all available SIs. The decision to route to an SI should be an active choice, based on the likelihood that the SI will offer a better all-in price (including fees and potential market impact) than the public markets.

- **Standardized RFQ Protocols**. When seeking liquidity for a block trade, a buy-side desk should use a request-for-quote (RFQ) system to solicit quotes from multiple SIs simultaneously. This creates competition among the SIs and reduces the information leakage that can occur when an order is shopped around serially. The RFQ process should be standardized to ensure that all SIs are quoting on the same basis.

- **Continuous Performance Monitoring**. All trades executed with SIs must be captured in a TCA system. This system should not just measure execution price against arrival price but should also track more sophisticated metrics like spread capture and reversion. Reversion analysis, which measures how the price moves in the moments after a trade, can be a powerful tool for detecting the market impact of an SI’s hedging activities.

- **Regular Performance Reviews**. The trading desk should hold formal, data-driven performance reviews with its SI counterparties on a regular basis (e.g. quarterly). These reviews should present the SI with the TCA data and ask for explanations of any anomalies or periods of underperformance. This process creates accountability and signals to the SI that its execution quality is being closely monitored.

![A futuristic, institutional-grade sphere, diagonally split, reveals a glowing teal core of intricate circuitry. This represents a high-fidelity execution engine for digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols, embodying market microstructure for latent liquidity and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling of SI Execution Quality

To effectively manage SI relationships, a buy-side firm must be able to quantify the quality of the execution it is receiving. This goes beyond simple slippage metrics and requires a more granular analysis of the SI’s quoting behavior. The table below presents a hypothetical analysis of quote quality from two different SIs for the same instrument over a series of RFQs. The analysis measures not just the competitiveness of the quoted price but also the consistency and reliability of the quoting process.

![A light sphere, representing a Principal's digital asset, is integrated into an angular blue RFQ protocol framework. Sharp fins symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-core-asset-rfq-protocol-framework-for-digital-derivatives.jpg)

## SI Quote Performance Analysis Table

| RFQ ID | SI Provider | Quote Response Time (ms) | Quoted Spread (bps) | Price vs EBBO (bps) | Win Rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RFQ-001 | SI-A | 50 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Won |
| RFQ-001 | SI-B | 75 | 5.5 | +0.5 | Lost |
| RFQ-002 | SI-A | 45 | 4.8 | -0.2 | Won |
| RFQ-002 | SI-B | 150 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Lost |
| RFQ-003 | SI-A | 200 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Lost |
| RFQ-003 | SI-B | 60 | 5.2 | +0.2 | Won |
| RFQ-004 | SI-A | 55 | 4.9 | -0.1 | Won |
| RFQ-004 | SI-B | 80 | 5.1 | +0.1 | Lost |

This type of analysis allows the trading desk to make objective, data-driven decisions. In this example, SI-A is generally faster and quotes tighter spreads, winning most of the trades. However, its performance in RFQ-003 was poor, with a slow response and a wide quote. This could be an anomaly or it could indicate that SI-A is less competitive under certain market conditions.

SI-B is slower and generally quotes wider, but it was the better choice in one instance. A sophisticated trading desk will use this data to build a dynamic routing logic, sending orders to the SI that is most likely to provide the best performance for a given instrument at a given time of day.

> Effective execution management requires moving beyond simple price comparisons to a multi-factor quantitative model of counterparty performance.

![A polished, dark spherical component anchors a sophisticated system architecture, flanked by a precise green data bus. This represents a high-fidelity execution engine, enabling institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Corporate Bond Block Trade

Consider the case of a portfolio manager at a large asset management firm who needs to sell a €25 million position in an illiquid corporate bond issued by a mid-sized European industrial company. The bond trades infrequently on any public venue, and the daily volume is typically less than €5 million. Attempting to sell this position on a lit market would be a significant challenge.

The order would represent multiple days of average volume, and simply placing a large sell order on the book would signal desperation and cause the price to plummet. The portfolio manager and the trading desk have two primary execution strategies to consider:

- **Strategy A Work the Order on an MTF**. The desk could break the €25 million order into many small child orders and feed them into the market slowly over several days or even weeks. This would require a sophisticated algorithmic trading strategy, such as a volume-weighted average price (VWAP) or an implementation shortfall algorithm. The goal would be to minimize market impact by participating in the market at a natural pace. The primary risk of this strategy is timing risk; if negative news about the company emerges during the multi-day execution period, the price of the bond could fall significantly before the full position is sold. There is also the risk of information leakage, as other market participants may detect the persistent selling pressure and trade against it.

- **Strategy B Use an RFQ to SIs**. The desk could use its RFQ system to solicit quotes for the full €25 million block from a select group of SIs that are known to make markets in this type of corporate credit. This strategy offers the potential for a clean, immediate execution of the entire position at a single price. The primary risk is that the SIs, knowing the seller is a large, motivated institution, will quote a price that is significantly below the current perceived fair value of the bond, seeking to capture a large spread for taking on the risk of the large position.

The trading desk decides to pursue Strategy B. It sends out an RFQ to three SIs. The current indicative quote on the MTF is 98.50 / 99.00. The SIs respond with the following firm quotes for the full €25 million size:

- **SI-1**. 98.10

- **SI-2**. 98.25

- **SI-3**. No Quote

The desk executes the trade with SI-2 at 98.25. The execution price is 25 basis points below the current offer on the lit market, which represents a cost of €62,500 on the trade. However, the desk has successfully transferred the entire risk of the position in a single transaction, avoiding the market impact and timing risk of working the order over several days.

The TCA report for this trade would show significant slippage against the offer price, but the execution would likely be considered a success given the illiquidity of the instrument and the size of the order. This scenario illustrates the fundamental trade-off of the SI model ▴ clients often pay an explicit cost in the form of a wider spread in exchange for the certainty and immediacy of execution for difficult trades.

![Intricate metallic mechanisms portray a proprietary matching engine or execution management system. Its robust structure enables algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-market-microstructure.jpg)

## References

- International Capital Market Association. “MiFID II implementation ▴ the Systematic Internaliser regime.” 2017.

- “MiFID II Systematic Internalizers Raise Concerns.” Traders Magazine, 2017.

- European Securities and Markets Authority. “MiFID II ▴ ESMA publishes data for the systematic internaliser calculations for equity, equity-like instruments and bonds.” 2019.

- BaFin. “Systematic internalisers ▴ Main points of the new supervisory regime under MiFID II.” 2017.

- “MiFID II ▴ Are you a systematic internaliser?” Ganado Advocates, 2024.

![A central, metallic, multi-bladed mechanism, symbolizing a core execution engine or RFQ hub, emits luminous teal data streams. These streams traverse through fragmented, transparent structures, representing dynamic market microstructure, high-fidelity price discovery, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery-across-fragmented-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Reflection

The integration of Systematic Internalisers into the market’s architecture presents a permanent set of strategic questions. The knowledge of their mechanics and inherent conflicts is the starting point. The real challenge is to architect an internal execution framework that treats these conflicts not as problems to be avoided, but as variables to be managed and optimized.

How does your own operational protocol currently measure the trade-off between the explicit cost of a wider spread from an SI and the implicit cost of market impact on a lit venue? Where are the data gaps in your TCA process that might obscure the true cost of information leakage?

Viewing the market as a system of interconnected liquidity pools, each with its own properties and protocols, is essential. The SI is one type of pool, offering deep, quiet liquidity at a price. The public exchange is another, offering transparent, but potentially volatile, liquidity. A superior execution strategy is not about choosing one over the other.

It is about building the systems, the analytics, and the decision-making frameworks to dynamically route liquidity to the optimal venue for each specific trade, at each specific moment in time. The ultimate edge lies in transforming a reactive trading process into a proactive, data-driven system of execution management.

![A central institutional Prime RFQ, showcasing intricate market microstructure, interacts with a translucent digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. An algorithmic trading engine, embodying a high-fidelity RFQ protocol, navigates this for precise multi-leg spread execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-navigating-digital-asset-derivative-liquidity.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systematic-internaliser/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A teal and white sphere precariously balanced on a light grey bar, itself resting on an angular base, depicts market microstructure at a critical price discovery point. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency and risk aggregation within a Principal trading desk's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-strategy.jpg)

## Systematic Internaliser

Meaning ▴ A Systematic Internaliser (SI) is a financial institution executing client orders against its own capital on an organized, frequent, systematic basis off-exchange. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/over-the-counter/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Over-The-Counter

Meaning ▴ Over-the-Counter refers to a decentralized market where financial instruments are traded directly between two parties, bypassing a centralized exchange or public order book. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-regulatory-and-compliance-frameworks-govern-the-use-of-rfq-protocols-in-cross-exchange-trading/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Engineered object with layered translucent discs and a clear dome encapsulating an opaque core. Symbolizing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, it represents a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-intelligence-engine.jpg)

## Public Exchange

A firm's compliance with RFQ regulations is achieved by architecting an auditable system that proves Best Execution for every trade. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-impact/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A reflective metallic disc, symbolizing a Centralized Liquidity Pool or Volatility Surface, is bisected by a precise rod, representing an RFQ Inquiry for High-Fidelity Execution. Translucent blue elements denote Dark Pool access and Private Quotation Networks, detailing Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Market Impact

Meaning ▴ Market Impact refers to the observed change in an asset's price resulting from the execution of a trading order, primarily influenced by the order's size relative to available liquidity and prevailing market conditions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A gold-hued precision instrument with a dark, sharp interface engages a complex circuit board, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within institutional market microstructure. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating private quotation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-precision-execution-engine-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-within-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-flow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A golden rod, symbolizing RFQ initiation, converges with a teal crystalline matching engine atop a liquidity pool sphere. This illustrates high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-systemic-core.jpg)

## Order Flow

Meaning ▴ Order Flow represents the real-time sequence of executable buy and sell instructions transmitted to a trading venue, encapsulating the continuous interaction of market participants' supply and demand. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-faceted plane represents a Principal's operational framework and Execution Management System. A central glossy black sphere signifies a block trade digital asset derivative, executed with atomic settlement via an RFQ protocol's private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-principal-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Mifid Ii

Meaning ▴ MiFID II, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, constitutes a comprehensive regulatory framework enacted by the European Union to govern financial markets, investment firms, and trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-discovery/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A pristine teal sphere, representing a high-fidelity digital asset, emerges from concentric layers of a sophisticated principal's operational framework. These layers symbolize market microstructure, aggregated liquidity pools, and RFQ protocol mechanisms ensuring best execution and optimal price discovery within an institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-2.jpg)

## Price Discovery

Meaning ▴ Price discovery is the continuous, dynamic process by which the market determines the fair value of an asset through the collective interaction of supply and demand. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/central-limit-order-book/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic, dark grey institutional platform with a glowing spherical core, embodying an intelligence layer for advanced price discovery. This Prime RFQ enables high-fidelity execution through RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives and managing liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Central Limit Order Book

Meaning ▴ A Central Limit Order Book is a digital repository that aggregates all outstanding buy and sell orders for a specific financial instrument, organized by price level and time of entry. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lit-market/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous central hub with radiating arms signifies an institutional RFQ protocol engine. It embodies seamless liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-hub-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Lit Market

Meaning ▴ A lit market is a trading venue providing mandatory pre-trade transparency. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/trading-desk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent sphere, representing a digital asset option, rests on an aqua geometric RFQ execution venue. This proprietary liquidity pool integrates with an opaque institutional grade infrastructure, depicting high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a Principal's operational framework for Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-prime-os.jpg)

## Trading Desk

Meaning ▴ A Trading Desk represents a specialized operational system within an institutional financial entity, designed for the systematic execution, risk management, and strategic positioning of proprietary capital or client orders across various asset classes, with a particular focus on the complex and nascent digital asset derivatives landscape. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/information-asymmetry/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

## Information Asymmetry

Meaning ▴ Information Asymmetry refers to a condition in a transaction or market where one party possesses superior or exclusive data relevant to the asset, counterparty, or market state compared to others. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished metallic surface with a central intricate mechanism, representing a high-fidelity market microstructure engine. Two sleek probes symbolize bilateral RFQ protocols for precise price discovery and atomic settlement of institutional digital asset derivatives on a Prime RFQ, ensuring best execution for Bitcoin Options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-market-microstructure-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Transaction Cost Analysis

Meaning ▴ Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) is the quantitative methodology for assessing the explicit and implicit costs incurred during the execution of financial trades. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-institutions-differentiate-between-price-reversion-and-trading-along-a-genuine-price-trend/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Diagonal composition of sleek metallic infrastructure with a bright green data stream alongside a multi-toned teal geometric block. This visualizes High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating RFQ Price Discovery within deep Liquidity Pools, critical for institutional Block Trades and Multi-Leg Spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-optimization-leveraging-proprietary-institutional-prime-os-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-latency-reduction.jpg)

## Execution Price

Institutions differentiate trend from reversion by integrating quantitative signals with real-time order flow analysis to decode market intent. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/conflict-of-interest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent sphere, representing a granular digital asset derivative or RFQ quote, precisely balances on a proprietary execution rail. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution within complex market microstructure, driven by rapid price discovery from an institutional-grade trading engine, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-precision-1.jpg)

## Conflict of Interest

Meaning ▴ A conflict of interest arises when an individual or entity holds two or more interests, one of which could potentially corrupt the motivation for an act in the other, particularly concerning professional duties or fiduciary responsibilities within financial markets. </a>

**Tags:** [Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/area/price-discovery/), [Market Impact](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-impact/), [Conflict of Interest](https://options.greeks.live/area/conflict-of-interest/), [Systematic Internaliser](https://options.greeks.live/area/systematic-internaliser/), [Over-the-Counter](https://options.greeks.live/area/over-the-counter/), [Price Formation](https://options.greeks.live/area/price-formation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Structural Differences between RFQ and CLOB Execution in Crypto Options?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-structural-differences-between-rfq-and-clob-execution-in-crypto-options/)
![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

Crypto options RFQ provides discreet, firm pricing for large blocks, while CLOBs offer transparent, continuous execution for standardized contracts.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Demonstrating Best Execution between Lit Markets and RFQ Protocols?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-demonstrating-best-execution-between-lit-markets-and-rfq-protocols/)
![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

Demonstrating best execution is a function of protocol architecture; one requires forensic analysis of public data, the other requires procedural validation of a private auction.

- 
### [How Does Counterparty Segmentation Affect Relationships with Liquidity Providers?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-counterparty-segmentation-affect-relationships-with-liquidity-providers/)
![Translucent teal panel with droplets signifies granular market microstructure and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives. Abstract beige and grey planes symbolize diverse institutional counterparties and multi-venue RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for block trades via aggregated inquiry.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

Counterparty segmentation is a risk-management protocol that enhances execution quality by aligning order flow with the specific capabilities of liquidity providers.

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Changes like Mifid Ii Impact the Strategic Choice between Rfq and Clob Venues?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-changes-like-mifid-ii-impact-the-strategic-choice-between-rfq-and-clob-venues/)
![Abstract sculpture with intersecting angular planes and a central sphere on a textured dark base. This embodies sophisticated market microstructure and multi-venue liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution through precise RFQ protocols within a Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-2.jpg)

MiFID II mandates a data-driven venue choice, favoring CLOBs for transparency and RFQs for managing large-order impact.

- 
### [Could Technological Innovations in Lit Markets Counter the Advantages Offered by Systematic Internalisers?](https://options.greeks.live/question/could-technological-innovations-in-lit-markets-counter-the-advantages-offered-by-systematic-internalisers/)
![Translucent teal glass pyramid and flat pane, geometrically aligned on a dark base, symbolize market microstructure and price discovery within RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes multi-leg spread construction, high-fidelity execution via a Principal's operational framework, ensuring atomic settlement for latent liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/transparent-geometric-structures-visualizing-multi-leg-spread-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Technological innovations enable lit markets to counter SIs by embedding discreet, low-impact execution protocols within a transparent framework.

- 
### [How Does Counterparty Segmentation Directly Impact a Firm’s Best Execution Policy?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-counterparty-segmentation-directly-impact-a-firms-best-execution-policy/)
![A sophisticated RFQ engine module, its spherical lens observing market microstructure and reflecting implied volatility. This Prime RFQ component ensures high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation for block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-protocol.jpg)

Counterparty segmentation architects the execution policy, systematically aligning order flow with specialized liquidity to optimize for best execution.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between RFQ Protocols for Equities versus Fixed Income Securities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-rfq-protocols-for-equities-versus-fixed-income-securities/)
![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols. It symbolizes Aggregated Inquiry, optimal Liquidity Pool access, and Atomic Settlement within a Principal OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

The primary difference is that fixed income RFQs create price discovery in opaque markets, while equity RFQs manage market impact in transparent ones.

- 
### [How Has the Systematic Internaliser Regime Altered Liquidity Sourcing?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-has-the-systematic-internaliser-regime-altered-liquidity-sourcing/)
![A sleek, two-toned dark and light blue surface with a metallic fin-like element and spherical component, embodying an advanced Principal OS for Digital Asset Derivatives. This visualizes a high-fidelity RFQ execution environment, enabling precise price discovery and optimal capital efficiency through intelligent smart order routing within complex market microstructure and dark liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

The Systematic Internaliser regime structurally alters liquidity sourcing by creating a new, regulated bilateral venue for accessing dealer capital.

- 
### [What Specific Criteria Justify Limiting Quote Provision under MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-specific-criteria-justify-limiting-quote-provision-under-mifid-ii/)
![A central split circular mechanism, half teal with liquid droplets, intersects four reflective angular planes. This abstractly depicts an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset options, enabling principal-led liquidity provision and block trade execution with high-fidelity price discovery within a low-latency market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-core-system-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-aggregated-liquidity.jpg)

MiFID II limits quote provision for large-in-scale trades, illiquid instruments, and specific protocols to optimize execution and manage risk.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Primary Conflicts of Interest Inherent in a Systematic Internaliser Model?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-conflicts-of-interest-inherent-in-a-systematic-internaliser-model/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-conflicts-of-interest-inherent-in-a-systematic-internaliser-model/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Primary Conflicts of Interest Inherent in a Systematic Internaliser Model? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The Systematic Internaliser model's core conflict is the duality of acting as both client agent and proprietary trader. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-conflicts-of-interest-inherent-in-a-systematic-internaliser-model/",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-30T11:39:12+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-07-31T04:24:15+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-core-algorithmic-execution-engine.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated internal mechanism, featuring a helical blue algorithmic trading core, is meticulously integrated with a robust, light-toned data intelligence layer, all contained within a polished teal institutional-grade casing. This visual metaphor illustrates a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, specifically optimized for RFQ protocols and multi-leg spread execution. It underscores the precision required for high-fidelity execution, managing market microstructure dynamics, and achieving best execution through advanced smart order routing for dark pool and block trade liquidity, minimizing slippage and information leakage."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best Execution",
        "Central Limit Order Book",
        "Conflict of Interest",
        "Information Asymmetry",
        "Liquidity Provision",
        "Lit Market",
        "Market Impact",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "MiFID II",
        "Order Flow",
        "Order Routing",
        "Over-the-Counter",
        "Price Discovery",
        "Price Formation",
        "Principal Trading",
        "Request for Quote",
        "Systematic Internaliser",
        "Trading Desk",
        "Transaction Cost Analysis"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does An SI Differ From A Public Exchange?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "A public exchange, or lit market, operates on a multilateral basis. It brings together orders from many different buyers and sellers through a central limit order book (CLOB). Price is determined through a continuous double auction process where orders are matched based on price and time priority. This system is designed for maximum transparency and democratic access; all participants can see the bids and offers available at any given moment. An SI, conversely, operates on a bilateral basis. It does not operate a multilateral system. The \"venue\" is the SI's own trading desk, and the counterparty to every client trade is the SI itself. This fundamental structural difference leads to a cascade of operational distinctions."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Can This Conflict Be Quantified?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The cost of this conflict can be measured through rigorous Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA). A buy-side firm can compare the execution price received from an SI against a variety of benchmarks to assess the quality of execution. The table below illustrates a simplified TCA report for a series of trades executed via an SI."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-conflicts-of-interest-inherent-in-a-systematic-internaliser-model/
