# What Are the Primary Legal Recourses in the Event of a Non-Bank Market Maker Failure? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-04
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated modular component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, featuring an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Its precision engineering facilitates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency for institutional participants](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-module.jpg)

![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Concept

The failure of a [non-bank market maker](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-bank-market-maker/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a systemic event that tests the very architecture of modern financial markets. It represents more than a counterparty loss; it is a structural integrity test for the entire trading ecosystem. When a key node in the network of liquidity provision ceases to function, the resulting shockwave propagates through clearinghouses, exchanges, and bilateral agreements, revealing the intricate dependencies that define high-frequency finance. Understanding the primary legal recourses in such a scenario requires a systems-level perspective, one that views the event not as a singular failure but as a cascade of interconnected obligations and potential fractures within the market’s operating system.

The immediate challenge is the containment of financial contagion. The subsequent process involves a meticulous disassembly of the failed entity’s positions and liabilities through a multi-layered legal and regulatory framework.

This framework is built upon several foundational pillars. The first is contract law, primarily embodied in master trading agreements like the [ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for derivatives or other bespoke prime brokerage agreements. These documents are the first line of defense, containing the specific protocols for default, termination, and the [close-out netting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of exposures. They are the pre-negotiated instructions for disassembly.

The second pillar is the specific rules and procedures of the trading venues and central counterparties (CCPs) where the [market maker](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-maker/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) operated. These organizations have their own default waterfalls and loss-sharing mechanisms designed to mutualize the risk and ensure the continuity of the broader market. Their actions are swift, automated, and governed by a rulebook that all members have contractually agreed to follow.

> A non-bank market maker’s collapse triggers a cascade of legal and procedural actions, testing the resilience of the entire financial market architecture.

The third pillar is national insolvency law, such as the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which provides the ultimate legal arena for the orderly liquidation or reorganization of the failed firm. Here, the process becomes more complex, as the specific treatment of a non-bank financial entity can vary significantly. Some may fall under the [Securities Investor Protection Act](https://prime.greeks.live/area/securities-investor-protection-act/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SIPA) if they are structured as broker-dealers, affording certain protections to their customers. Others, if deemed systemically important, could be subject to the [Orderly Liquidation Authority](https://prime.greeks.live/area/orderly-liquidation-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (OLA) established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

This mechanism allows regulators to take control of a failing firm to mitigate systemic risk, superseding the standard bankruptcy process. Each of these legal regimes operates on different timelines, with different priorities and different outcomes for counterparties. Navigating them requires a precise understanding of the failed firm’s corporate structure and regulatory status.

Finally, the fourth pillar is the overarching securities and commodities laws enforced by regulatory bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). These agencies investigate the causes of the failure, looking for evidence of fraud, market manipulation, or violations of trading obligations. A [private right of action](https://prime.greeks.live/area/private-right-of-action/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) may exist for counterparties who can demonstrate that their losses stemmed from such violations, opening a separate legal avenue for recovery that runs parallel to the insolvency proceedings.

The interplay between these four pillars ▴ contract law, exchange rules, insolvency regimes, and regulatory enforcement ▴ creates a complex, multi-faceted response system. The effectiveness of one’s legal recourse depends entirely on the ability to understand and navigate this intricate system with precision and strategic foresight.

![A focused view of a robust, beige cylindrical component with a dark blue internal aperture, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution channel. This element represents the core of an RFQ protocol system, enabling bespoke liquidity for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, minimizing slippage and information leakage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-precision-component.jpg)

![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Strategy

A strategic framework for addressing a [non-bank market](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-vetting-a-bank-counterparty-and-a-non-bank-market-maker/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) maker failure is predicated on a disciplined, multi-stage approach that moves from immediate risk mitigation to long-term value recovery. The core objective is to crystallize and secure one’s claim in a chaotic environment where asset values are uncertain and the pool of available capital is finite. This process requires a synthesis of legal, operational, and quantitative expertise.

![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Phase One Immediate Triage and Exposure Crystallization

The instant a failure is suspected or announced, the primary strategic imperative is to gain control over one’s own exposure. This is an operational and quantitative exercise before it becomes a legal one. The first step is to trigger the relevant clauses within the governing trading agreements.

For most institutional participants, this means issuing a notice of default under the terms of an ISDA [Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) or equivalent contract. This act is legally significant; it formally establishes the event of default and provides the contractual basis for all subsequent actions, including the termination of outstanding transactions.

Simultaneously, a quantitative team must perform a full-scale valuation of all outstanding positions with the failed counterparty. This involves marking to market every derivative, future, and forward contract. The process is complicated by the very event of the failure, which can inject extreme volatility into the markets where the failed firm was a major participant. The goal is to arrive at a single, defensible net termination amount.

This calculation, known as close-out netting, is a cornerstone of modern financial [risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It allows a counterparty to aggregate the values of all terminated transactions into a single net sum payable by one party to the other. The legal enforceability of this netting provision across different jurisdictions is one of the most critical aspects of the entire recourse strategy. Without it, a firm might be required to pay its obligations to the failed entity’s estate while its own claims are relegated to the status of an unsecured creditor.

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Phase Two Navigating the Legal Venues

With a crystallized claim amount, the strategy shifts to selecting the appropriate legal and procedural venues for pursuing that claim. This is a multi-pronged effort that often proceeds on parallel tracks.

- 
**Contractual Arbitration** Many trading agreements contain clauses that mandate arbitration for disputes. For certain types of claims, such as those related to trade execution errors or specific contractual breaches preceding the insolvency, this can be an efficient venue. For instance, FINRA operates a large arbitration forum that handles disputes involving broker-dealers. The strategic decision here is whether the nature of the dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration clause and whether this venue offers a faster path to resolution than the broader insolvency proceedings.

- 
**Insolvency Proceedings** This is the central arena for most claims. The strategy here depends on the specific legal regime governing the failed entity. If the firm is in a standard bankruptcy proceeding (e.g. Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 in the U.S.), the counterparty becomes a creditor and must file a [proof of claim](https://prime.greeks.live/area/proof-of-claim/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) with the bankruptcy court. The strategy involves actively participating in the creditors’ committee to influence the liquidation process and ensure the proper valuation and priority of one’s claim. If the firm is subject to a special resolution regime like SIPA or the OLA, the process is different. The counterparty will be dealing with a trustee or a government agency (like the FDIC under OLA) that has broad powers to transfer assets, repudiate contracts, and determine claims. The strategy in this context is one of careful negotiation and documented correspondence with the resolving authority.

- 
**Regulatory Action and Private Litigation** A parallel strategic track involves leveraging regulatory frameworks. If there is evidence that the market maker’s failure was caused by or involved illegal acts, such as fraud or manipulation, a counterparty may have a private right of action under securities laws. Pursuing such a claim is a strategic decision that weighs the high burden of proof and cost of litigation against the potential for recovering damages that might not be available in the bankruptcy proceeding. Furthermore, providing information to and cooperating with regulatory investigators (like the SEC or CFTC) can be a strategic move. While regulators do not represent individual claimants, their enforcement actions can uncover assets or establish facts that are beneficial to the claims of all creditors.

![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## What Is the Hierarchy of Claims in an Insolvency?

Understanding the hierarchy of claims is a critical strategic component. In any insolvency, claimants are paid out according to a strict order of priority. A simplified representation of this hierarchy is essential for managing expectations and directing strategic effort.

| Priority Level | Claimant Type | Description of Claim | Strategic Consideration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Secured Creditors | Claims backed by specific collateral (e.g. a loan secured by property or securities). | The primary strategy is to ensure the perfection of the security interest and the proper valuation of the collateral. The goal is to recover the collateral or its value directly. |
| 2 | Administrative Claims | Costs associated with administering the insolvency proceeding itself (e.g. fees for lawyers, trustees). | Counterparties generally do not hold these claims, but they must be aware that these are paid first from the estate’s assets, reducing the pool available for others. |
| 3 | Priority Unsecured Claims | Certain types of unsecured claims that are given priority by law (e.g. employee wages, taxes). | This is another layer that is paid before general unsecured creditors. |
| 4 | General Unsecured Creditors | Claims not backed by collateral. This includes most counterparty net termination amounts after collateral has been applied. | This is where most financial counterparties find themselves. The strategy is to maximize the pro-rata distribution by participating in the creditors’ committee and challenging improper claims. |
| 5 | Equity Holders | Owners of the failed firm. | Equity holders are last in line and typically recover nothing in an insolvency. |

The core strategy for a financial counterparty is to use contractual tools, like collateral agreements, to move as much of their claim as possible from the “General Unsecured” category to the “Secured” category. This is why the management of collateral is a central pillar of institutional risk management.

![Geometric planes and transparent spheres represent complex market microstructure. A central luminous core signifies efficient price discovery and atomic settlement via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-4.jpg)

![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase of managing a non-bank market maker failure is a high-stakes, time-compressed procedure that demands flawless operational discipline and deep legal-technical knowledge. It is the practical application of the strategies outlined previously, translated into a series of precise, auditable actions. The execution is not a single event but a campaign waged across multiple fronts ▴ internal operations, legal filings, and regulatory interfaces.

![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Counterparty Default

Every institutional trading desk must have a pre-defined, rigorously tested operational playbook for a counterparty default. This is a checklist-driven process designed to be executed under extreme pressure. The objective is to move from chaos to a state of controlled, documented action.

- 
**Activation Trigger** The process begins with a verified trigger event. This could be a public announcement of bankruptcy, a notice from a clearinghouse, or a failure to meet a margin call. The head of trading or a designated risk officer must formally declare the counterparty in default to initiate the playbook.

- 
**Communications Lockdown** All verbal and electronic communication with the defaulted counterparty is immediately ceased, except for formal notices sent by the legal department. This prevents any inadvertent agreements or concessions. All internal communications are routed through a dedicated “default management team” to ensure consistency.

- 
**Position Isolation and Risk Neutralization** The immediate priority is to hedge the market risk from the now-uncollateralized positions. The firm’s entire portfolio of trades with the failed entity is isolated in the risk system. Traders then execute new trades in the open market to offset the delta, vega, and other Greeks of the orphaned positions. This action is time-critical to prevent further losses from adverse market movements.

- 
**Formal Notice Delivery** The legal team, following the precise instructions in the ISDA Master Agreement or other governing contract, drafts and delivers a formal Notice of Default and Termination. This notice will specify the Event of Default and designate an [Early Termination Date](https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination-date/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The method of delivery (e.g. certified mail, courier, email with specific protocols) must strictly adhere to the contract’s notice provisions to be legally effective.

- 
**Close-Out Amount Calculation** A dedicated quantitative team, working with legal and trading, performs the close-out calculation as of the Early Termination Date. This is a meticulous process that must be fully documented and defensible in court. The table below illustrates a simplified version of this calculation.

![A central control knob on a metallic platform, bisected by sharp reflective lines, embodies an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts intricate market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery for multi-leg options, and robust Prime RFQ deployment, optimizing latent liquidity across digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-core-microstructure.jpg)

## How Is a Close out Amount Calculated?

The calculation of the net termination amount is a foundational execution step. It aggregates all gains and losses on terminated trades into a single number. The following table provides a hypothetical example of a close-out calculation for a portfolio of derivatives with a failed market maker.

| Transaction ID | Instrument Type | Notional Amount (USD) | Mark-to-Market (MtM) Value (USD) | Direction | Payable/Receivable |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FX-FWD-001 | EUR/USD Forward | 100,000,000 | 1,250,000 | Receivable from Failed Co. | 1,250,000 |
| IRS-001 | Interest Rate Swap | 250,000,000 | -3,500,000 | Payable to Failed Co. | -3,500,000 |
| OPT-001 | Equity Index Option | 50,000,000 | 750,000 | Receivable from Failed Co. | 750,000 |
| CDS-001 | Credit Default Swap | 75,000,000 | -500,000 | Payable to Failed Co. | -500,000 |
| Subtotal | | | | Net MtM | -2,000,000 |
| Collateral Posted | Cash | | | Held by Our Firm | 5,000,000 |
| Collateral Held | Cash | | | Held by Failed Co. | -1,000,000 |
| Final Net Amount | | | | Net Receivable | 2,000,000 |

In this example, after netting the MtM values of all trades, our firm owes the failed counterparty $2,000,000. However, after accounting for the collateral held and posted, our firm has a net claim of $2,000,000 against the failed entity’s estate. This final number is the amount that will be filed in the insolvency proceeding.

![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## Executing the Legal Process

With the operational and quantitative groundwork laid, the execution shifts to the legal arena. This requires a coordinated effort between in-house counsel and external insolvency specialists.

- 
**Filing the Proof of Claim** This is the formal document submitted to the bankruptcy court or resolving authority. It must be filed before a specific deadline, known as the “bar date.” The proof of claim must contain the detailed close-out calculation, a copy of the governing trading agreement, and the default notices. An error or omission in this filing can jeopardize the entire claim.

- 
**Monitoring the Proceedings** The legal team must actively monitor every filing and motion in the insolvency case. This includes reviewing the debtor’s schedule of assets and liabilities to ensure your claim is listed correctly. It also involves scrutinizing motions from other creditors that could dilute the value of your claim.

- 
**Joining the [Unsecured Creditors](https://prime.greeks.live/area/unsecured-creditors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’ Committee** For significant claims, a key execution step is to secure a seat on the official committee of unsecured creditors. This committee has a formal role in the bankruptcy process, with the power to investigate the debtor’s affairs and negotiate the plan of liquidation or reorganization. A position on this committee provides a critical information advantage and a voice in the outcome.

- 
**Handling Regulatory Inquiries** The failure of a market maker will invariably trigger investigations by regulators. The execution here involves establishing a single point of contact within the firm to manage all information requests from agencies like the SEC, CFTC, or FINRA. All responses must be carefully vetted by legal counsel to ensure accuracy and avoid any admissions that could create liability. Cooperation is often the best strategy, as it can build goodwill and provide access to the regulator’s own findings.

![A precision-engineered, multi-layered system visually representing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its interlocking components symbolize robust market microstructure, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-4.jpg)

## What If the Firm Is Systemically Important?

If the non-bank market maker is designated as a [systemically important financial institution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemically-important-financial-institution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SIFI) by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), the execution path changes dramatically. The standard bankruptcy process is replaced by the Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA), administered by the FDIC. In this scenario, counterparties are dealing with a powerful government receiver. The execution playbook must adapt.

The power to stay legal actions is broader, and the receiver has the authority to transfer qualified financial contracts (QFCs) to a bridge institution or another solvent firm. The key execution step here is rapid analysis. A counterparty must quickly determine if its contracts have been transferred. If they have, the counterparty relationship continues with a new, solvent entity.

If they have not been transferred, they will be terminated, and the counterparty is left with a claim against the receivership. This process is designed for speed and systemic stability, and counterparties must execute their analysis and decision-making within the compressed timeframes dictated by the FDIC.

![A multi-faceted geometric object with varied reflective surfaces rests on a dark, curved base. It embodies complex RFQ protocols and deep liquidity pool dynamics, representing advanced market microstructure for precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/multi-faceted-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-infrastructure.jpg)

## References

- Goforth, Carol R. “Providing Liquidity in a High-Frequency World ▴ Trading Obligations and Privileges of Market Makers and a Private Right of Action.” _Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law_, vol. 10, no. 2, 2016, pp. 303-356.

- Casey, Anthony J. and Joshua C. Macey. “Regulation by Threat ▴ Dodd-Frank and the Nonbank Problem.” _The University of Chicago Law Review_, vol. 84, no. 3, 2017, pp. 1413-1466.

- Financial Markets Law Committee. “Unsettled OTC Trades.” _FMLC Publications_, September 2009.

- Weltz, Richard. “Failure To Execute Trades | Securities Law.” _Weltz Law_, www.weltzlaw.com/failure-to-execute-trades/. Accessed 4 Aug. 2025.

- Harris, Larry. _Trading and Exchanges ▴ Market Microstructure for Practitioners_. Oxford University Press, 2003.

- Tuckman, Bruce, and Angel Serrat. _Fixed Income Securities ▴ Tools for Today’s Markets_. 3rd ed. Wiley, 2011.

- Gregory, Jon. _The xVA Challenge ▴ Counterparty Credit Risk, Funding, Collateral, and Capital_. 4th ed. Wiley, 2020.

![Abstract geometric forms, including overlapping planes and central spherical nodes, visually represent a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. It depicts complex multi-leg spread execution, dynamic RFQ protocol liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic trading within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution-alpha-generation-prime-os-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Reflection

The architecture of legal recourse following a market maker’s failure is a testament to the market’s capacity for adaptation. It is a system designed in response to past crises, a framework of contractual, procedural, and regulatory protocols intended to impose order on chaos. Contemplating this structure prompts a deeper inquiry into one’s own operational resilience. How robust are the internal playbooks for such an event?

Are the quantitative methods for exposure calculation sufficiently rigorous to withstand judicial scrutiny? Is the network of legal and operational relationships strong enough to navigate the complexities of a multi-jurisdictional insolvency?

The knowledge of these recourse mechanisms is more than a contingency plan. It is a critical component of a firm’s overall strategic intelligence. Understanding the failure points in the system and the precise mechanics of resolution provides a profound advantage in day-to-day risk management. It informs the negotiation of trading agreements, the allocation of credit lines, and the selection of counterparties.

The ultimate goal is to build an operational framework so resilient that the need for legal recourse becomes a managed possibility, an event for which the protocols are so deeply embedded that their execution is a matter of discipline, not desperation. The system is designed to function under stress; the true measure of an institution is its ability to function within that system with precision and control.

![A conceptual image illustrates a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine, depicting the market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Two semi-spheres, one light grey and one teal, represent distinct liquidity pools or counterparties within a Prime RFQ, connected by a complex execution management system for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement of Bitcoin options or Ethereum futures](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-bank-market-maker/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Non-Bank Market Maker

Meaning ▴ A Non-Bank Market Maker is an entity that provides liquidity to financial markets by quoting both bid and offer prices for assets, but operates outside the traditional commercial banking system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central RFQ engine drives block trades and price discovery with high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The ISDA Master Agreement, while originating in traditional finance, serves as a crucial foundational legal framework for institutional participants engaging in over-the-counter (OTC) crypto derivatives trading and complex RFQ crypto transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Close-Out Netting

Meaning ▴ Close-out netting is a legally enforceable contractual provision that, upon the occurrence of a default event by one counterparty, immediately terminates all outstanding transactions between the parties and converts all reciprocal obligations into a single, net payment or receipt. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-maker/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Market Maker

Meaning ▴ A Market Maker, in the context of crypto financial markets, is an entity that continuously provides liquidity by simultaneously offering to buy (bid) and sell (ask) a particular cryptocurrency or derivative. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/securities-investor-protection-act/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

## Securities Investor Protection Act

Meaning ▴ The Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA) is United States federal legislation establishing the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), a non-profit, member-funded corporation that provides financial protection for customers of brokerage firms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/orderly-liquidation-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A refined object featuring a translucent teal element, symbolizing a dynamic RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precision embodies High-Fidelity Execution and seamless Price Discovery within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-for-optimal-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Orderly Liquidation Authority

Meaning ▴ Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA) refers to the legal and operational framework designed to manage the failure of systematically important financial institutions in a controlled manner, preventing contagion and systemic market disruption. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/private-right-of-action/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, off-white cylindrical module with a dark blue recessed oval interface. This represents a Principal's Prime RFQ gateway for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity price discovery and capital efficiency through low-latency liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-portal-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## Private Right of Action

Meaning ▴ A Private Right of Action is a legal principle allowing private individuals or entities to sue another party for violations of a statute, even if that statute does not explicitly grant such a right. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-vetting-a-bank-counterparty-and-a-non-bank-market-maker/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract clear and teal geometric forms, including a central lens, intersect a reflective metallic surface on black. This embodies market microstructure precision, algorithmic trading for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Non-Bank Market

Vetting a bank assesses systemic credit risk; vetting a non-bank market maker audits operational and technological integrity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Close-up reveals robust metallic components of an institutional-grade execution management system. Precision-engineered surfaces and central pivot signify high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-precision-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-best-execution-and-prime-os.jpg)

## Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ A Master Agreement is a standardized, foundational legal contract that establishes the overarching terms and conditions governing all future transactions between two parties for specific financial instruments, such as derivatives or foreign exchange. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image depicts two intersecting structural beams, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. These elements represent interconnected liquidity pools and execution pathways, crucial for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg)

## Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Risk Management, within the cryptocurrency trading domain, encompasses the comprehensive process of identifying, assessing, monitoring, and mitigating the multifaceted financial, operational, and technological exposures inherent in digital asset markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/proof-of-claim/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

## Proof of Claim

Meaning ▴ A Proof of Claim is a formal written statement submitted by a creditor in a bankruptcy, insolvency, or liquidation proceeding, asserting their right to be paid a specific amount by the debtor. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination-date/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives execution system cutaway. The teal Prime RFQ casing reveals intricate market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

## Early Termination Date

Meaning ▴ An Early Termination Date refers to a specific, contractually defined point in time, prior to a financial instrument's scheduled maturity, at which the agreement can be concluded. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/unsecured-creditors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, black and beige institutional-grade device, featuring a prominent optical lens for real-time market microstructure analysis and an open modular port. This RFQ protocol engine facilitates high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, optimizing price discovery for digital asset derivatives and accessing latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation-across-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Unsecured Creditors

Meaning ▴ Unsecured creditors in the crypto finance domain are individuals or entities owed funds or assets that do not hold a specific claim or lien against any particular collateral belonging to the debtor. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemically-important-financial-institution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central dark nexus with intersecting data conduits and swirling translucent elements depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol's intelligence layer. This visualizes dynamic market microstructure, precise price discovery, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-visualizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Systemically Important Financial Institution

Meaning ▴ A Systemically Important Financial Institution (SIFI) is a financial entity whose distress or failure would pose a significant risk to the broader financial system and economy. </a>

**Tags:** [Dodd-Frank Act](https://options.greeks.live/area/dodd-frank-act/), [Close-Out Netting](https://options.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/), [Risk Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/risk-management/), [Securities Investor Protection Act](https://options.greeks.live/area/securities-investor-protection-act/), [Systemically Important Financial Institution](https://options.greeks.live/area/systemically-important-financial-institution/), [Unsecured Creditors](https://options.greeks.live/area/unsecured-creditors/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [Can a Party Still Use Its Own Internal Models for Valuation under the More Objective 2002 ISDA Standard?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-party-still-use-its-own-internal-models-for-valuation-under-the-more-objective-2002-isda-standard/)
![An exposed high-fidelity execution engine reveals the complex market microstructure of an institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS. Precision components facilitate smart order routing and multi-leg spread strategies. A central intelligence layer supports RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and robust counterparty risk management for prime brokerage operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-2.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA framework permits internal model valuation, provided the methodology constitutes a defensible, commercially reasonable system.

- 
### [Why Was the Close-Out Amount a Significant Change in the 2002 ISDA?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-was-the-close-out-amount-a-significant-change-in-the-2002-isda/)
![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA's Close-Out Amount replaced a flawed, rigid valuation system with a flexible, commercially reasonable standard.

- 
### [How Does the Choice of RFQ Protocol Affect an Institution’s Ability to Manage Counterparty Risk?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-choice-of-rfq-protocol-affect-an-institutions-ability-to-manage-counterparty-risk/)
![A sophisticated control panel, featuring concentric blue and white segments with two teal oval buttons. This embodies an institutional RFQ Protocol interface, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Private Quotation and Aggregated Inquiry. It represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer, optimizing Capital Efficiency within complex Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

RFQ protocol choice directly governs counterparty risk by defining the intersection of information control, credit verification, and settlement finality.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in a Default Management Scenario between Bilateral and Multilateral Arrangements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-a-default-management-scenario-between-bilateral-and-multilateral-arrangements/)
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

Bilateral default management is a fragmented, counterparty-by-counterparty process; multilateral is a centralized, system-wide protocol.

- 
### [How Does Counterparty Risk Differ from Standard Lending Risk?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-counterparty-risk-differ-from-standard-lending-risk/)
![Precision-engineered system components in beige, teal, and metallic converge at a vibrant blue interface. This symbolizes a critical RFQ protocol junction within an institutional Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives. It optimizes latency and market microstructure for private quotation and block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-connectivity-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Counterparty risk is a dynamic, bilateral exposure to a contract's fluctuating value; lending risk is a static, unilateral exposure to default on a fixed principal.

- 
### [How Do Jurisdictional Differences Impact Global Private Quote Protocol Design?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-jurisdictional-differences-impact-global-private-quote-protocol-design/)
![A polished metallic needle, crowned with a faceted blue gem, precisely inserted into the central spindle of a reflective digital storage platter. This visually represents the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement and liquidity aggregation through a sophisticated Prime RFQ intelligence layer for optimal price discovery and alpha generation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-via-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

A global RFQ protocol's value is defined by its embedded intelligence to navigate disparate sovereign rules for seamless execution.

- 
### [Why Was the First Method of Payment Abolished in the 2002 ISDA Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-was-the-first-method-of-payment-abolished-in-the-2002-isda-agreement/)
![A sleek, futuristic apparatus featuring a central spherical processing unit flanked by dual reflective surfaces and illuminated data conduits. This system visually represents an advanced RFQ protocol engine facilitating high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies precise price discovery, multi-leg spread processing, and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-options-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-interface.jpg)

The First Method was abolished because its "walkaway" clause created systemic risk and was legally unenforceable in bankruptcy.

- 
### [What Legal Frameworks Govern Counterparty Risk in over the Counter Derivatives Markets?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-legal-frameworks-govern-counterparty-risk-in-over-the-counter-derivatives-markets/)
![A central teal and dark blue conduit intersects dynamic, speckled gray surfaces. This embodies institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution across fragmented liquidity pools. It optimizes price discovery, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-3.jpg)

The legal frameworks governing OTC derivatives are a multi-layered system designed to quantify, collateralize, and centralize counterparty risk.

- 
### [Why Is the Treatment of Netting Arrangements under Insolvency Law a Critical Factor for Financial Stability?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-is-the-treatment-of-netting-arrangements-under-insolvency-law-a-critical-factor-for-financial-stability/)
![A transparent geometric structure symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Its converging facets represent diverse liquidity pools and precise price discovery via an RFQ protocol, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement through a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-for-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

The legal enforceability of netting in insolvency is a critical protocol that contains systemic risk by transforming chaotic gross exposures into a single net position.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Primary Legal Recourses in the Event of a Non-Bank Market Maker Failure?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-recourses-in-the-event-of-a-non-bank-market-maker-failure/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-recourses-in-the-event-of-a-non-bank-market-maker-failure/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Primary Legal Recourses in the Event of a Non-Bank Market Maker Failure? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The primary legal recourses for a non-bank market maker failure are contractual close-out netting, insolvency claims, and regulatory action. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-recourses-in-the-event-of-a-non-bank-market-maker-failure/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-04T13:44:07+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-25T03:44:02+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, close-up view of an advanced institutional-grade system component, embodying the precision of digital asset derivatives trading. This Prime RFQ core, with its etched market microstructure and central intelligence layer, orchestrates RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution. It ensures low-latency price discovery and capital efficiency in complex multi-leg spreads, minimizing slippage and counterparty risk for block trades."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Close-Out Netting",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Dodd-Frank Act",
        "Early Termination Date",
        "FINRA Arbitration",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Market Maker",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "Master Agreement",
        "Non-Bank Market Maker",
        "Orderly Liquidation Authority",
        "Private Right of Action",
        "Proof of Claim",
        "Risk Management",
        "Securities Investor Protection Act",
        "Systemically Important Financial Institution",
        "Unsecured Creditors",
        "Unsecured Creditors' Committee"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Is The Hierarchy Of Claims In An Insolvency?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Understanding the hierarchy of claims is a critical strategic component. In any insolvency, claimants are paid out according to a strict order of priority. A simplified representation of this hierarchy is essential for managing expectations and directing strategic effort."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Is A Close Out Amount Calculated?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The calculation of the net termination amount is a foundational execution step. It aggregates all gains and losses on terminated trades into a single number. The following table provides a hypothetical example of a close-out calculation for a portfolio of derivatives with a failed market maker."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What If The Firm Is Systemically Important?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "If the non-bank market maker is designated as a systemically important financial institution (SIFI) by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), the execution path changes dramatically. The standard bankruptcy process is replaced by the Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA), administered by the FDIC. In this scenario, counterparties are dealing with a powerful government receiver. The execution playbook must adapt. The power to stay legal actions is broader, and the receiver has the authority to transfer qualified financial contracts (QFCs) to a bridge institution or another solvent firm. The key execution step here is rapid analysis. A counterparty must quickly determine if its contracts have been transferred. If they have, the counterparty relationship continues with a new, solvent entity. If they have not been transferred, they will be terminated, and the counterparty is left with a claim against the receivership. This process is designed for speed and systemic stability, and counterparties must execute their analysis and decision-making within the compressed timeframes dictated by the FDIC."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-recourses-in-the-event-of-a-non-bank-market-maker-failure/
