# What Are the Primary Risks of Misaligning Srm Strategy and Rfp Evaluation Criteria? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

![Sleek Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. An elongated panel displays dynamic numeric readouts, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and real-time market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-options.jpg)

## Concept

The misalignment between a [Supplier Relationship Management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/supplier-relationship-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SRM) strategy and the corresponding [Request for Proposal](https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-proposal/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RFP) evaluation criteria represents a fundamental fracture in an organization’s procurement architecture. This disconnect is not a minor procedural oversight; it is a systemic design flaw that guarantees value leakage, strategic drift, and the erosion of competitive advantage. At its core, an SRM strategy defines the intended nature of engagement with the supply base ▴ be it fostering innovation, securing supply continuity, driving down costs, or achieving sustainability goals. The RFP process is the primary mechanism through which these strategic suppliers are identified, evaluated, and onboarded.

When the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) within that RFP fail to reflect the specific goals of the SRM program, the organization is effectively using a miscalibrated instrument to perform a critical measurement. The immediate result is the selection of suppliers who are operationally or culturally misaligned with the organization’s long-term objectives.

This dissonance creates a cascade of compounding risks. The most immediate and tangible risk is financial. Selecting a supplier based on an evaluation that over-weights price, for instance, when the SRM strategy calls for a collaborative innovation partner, leads to a contractual relationship that is unfit for its intended purpose. The chosen supplier, optimized for low-cost service delivery, will lack the capabilities, incentives, and operational structure to co-invest in research and development or adapt to evolving requirements.

This forces the organization into a cycle of costly contract renegotiations, scope changes, and performance management interventions. The initial cost savings identified in the RFP become illusory, quickly consumed by the operational friction and missed opportunities that define the relationship. The procurement function, in this scenario, succeeds only in its most tactical mandate ▴ securing a low price ▴ while failing its strategic mandate to build a resilient and value-generating supply base.

![Robust institutional Prime RFQ core connects to a precise RFQ protocol engine. Multi-leg spread execution blades propel a digital asset derivative target, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-proto-insti-digital-asset-derivs-hi-fi-exec-capital-effi-risk-mgmt.jpg)

## The Systemic Nature of Value Erosion

Understanding this misalignment requires viewing procurement not as a series of discrete events but as an integrated system. The SRM strategy is the system’s blueprint, outlining the desired outputs. The RFP is a critical input gate. A misalignment introduces a fundamental conflict between the blueprint and the gate’s filter.

This conflict ensures that the components entering the system (the new suppliers) are incompatible with the system’s design. The consequences extend far beyond a single [supplier relationship](https://prime.greeks.live/area/supplier-relationship/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It degrades the integrity of the entire supply chain ecosystem. A pattern of misaligned RFPs signals to the market that the organization’s stated strategic priorities are not its actual priorities.

High-capability suppliers, who could be strategic partners, may choose to disengage from the bidding process, recognizing that the evaluation criteria do not value their core competencies. This leads to a progressive thinning of the qualified supplier pool, reducing competition and concentrating risk among a less-capable set of incumbents.

![Abstract geometric forms converge at a central point, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This depicts RFQ protocol aggregation and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-core-liquidity-hub.jpg)

## Operational Friction and Strategic Drag

The operational consequences manifest as persistent friction. Internal stakeholders, from engineering to marketing, find themselves working with suppliers who cannot meet their evolving needs. This creates internal conflict, slows down product development cycles, and increases the administrative burden on contract managers who are tasked with remediating performance gaps that were predictable from the outset. This operational drag has a direct impact on the organization’s ability to execute its broader corporate strategy.

If the corporate strategy depends on speed to market, but the procurement system selects suppliers based on the lowest price rather than agility, the two objectives are in direct opposition. The misalignment between the micro-level [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and the macro-level SRM strategy creates a powerful anchor, preventing the organization from moving in its desired strategic direction.

> A misaligned RFP evaluation acts as a faulty transmission, preventing the engine of SRM strategy from delivering power to the wheels of operational reality.

Ultimately, the primary risk is one of identity. It raises the question of what the procurement function is truly for. Is it a tactical cost center focused on short-term savings, or is it a strategic enabler of enterprise value? A persistent misalignment between SRM and RFP evaluation provides a clear answer ▴ the function is operating tactically, regardless of its stated strategic intent.

This erodes the credibility of procurement within the organization and with the external market, making it progressively harder to attract the talent, resources, and supplier partnerships necessary to fulfill a truly strategic role. The correction of this issue is therefore not a matter of adjusting a few scores in an RFP template; it is about redesigning the informational and procedural DNA of the procurement operating model to ensure coherence between intent and action.

![Luminous blue drops on geometric planes depict institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. Large spheres represent atomic settlement of block trades and aggregated inquiries, while smaller droplets signify granular market microstructure data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-driving-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

![The image features layered structural elements, representing diverse liquidity pools and market segments within a Principal's operational framework. A sharp, reflective plane intersects, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery via private quotation protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing atomic settlement nodes](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-interplay-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Strategy

To bridge the gap [between Supplier Relationship Management](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-rfp-scoring-and-long-term-supplier-relationship-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SRM) intent and Request for Proposal (RFP) execution, an organization must architect a deliberate and coherent strategic framework. This framework’s purpose is to translate high-level SRM objectives into granular, measurable, and correctly weighted evaluation criteria. The absence of such a framework is the primary reason for misalignment; teams default to generic, price-centric evaluation models because a robust, strategy-driven alternative has not been systematically embedded into the procurement process. The development of this framework begins with the explicit categorization of supplier relationships and the clear articulation of the value proposition expected from each category.

An effective strategy involves segmenting the supply base into distinct tiers, each with a corresponding SRM approach. For example, suppliers might be classified as ‘Transactional,’ ‘Collaborative,’ or ‘Strategic.’ A ‘Transactional’ relationship may prioritize cost and efficiency, making a higher weighting on price in the RFP evaluation appropriate. A ‘Collaborative’ supplier might be essential for operational stability, requiring the RFP to balance price with criteria like reliability, capacity, and service levels. For a ‘Strategic’ partner, the goal is co-creation of value and long-term competitive advantage.

Here, the RFP evaluation must be radically different, emphasizing criteria such as technological capability, cultural fit, innovation potential, and willingness to invest in a joint roadmap. The strategic act is to ensure that every RFP document is preceded by a decision on which of these SRM categories the potential supplier will occupy, and then deploying a pre-defined evaluation template designed for that specific category.

![A sophisticated mechanism features a segmented disc, indicating dynamic market microstructure and liquidity pool partitioning. This system visually represents an RFQ protocol's price discovery process, crucial for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives and managing counterparty risk within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Designing the Strategic Evaluation Matrix

The core of this framework is the [Strategic Evaluation Matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-requirements-traceability-matrix-and-an-rfp-compliance-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), a tool that maps SRM objectives directly to [RFP evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and their corresponding weights. This is a living document, not a static template, that should be reviewed and adapted as corporate priorities evolve. Its creation is a cross-functional exercise, involving not just procurement, but also finance, operations, and the specific business units that will depend on the supplier. This collaborative input is essential for ensuring that the criteria reflect the true, holistic needs of the organization, rather than the narrow perspective of a single department.

The matrix functions by deconstructing broad strategic goals into quantifiable and qualitative indicators. For an SRM strategy focused on ‘Innovation,’ the matrix would mandate specific RFP questions and evaluation criteria. These could include assessing a supplier’s R&D expenditure as a percentage of revenue, the maturity of their product roadmap, the intellectual property they hold, and case studies of past collaborative innovation projects.

The weighting for these criteria would be significant, while the weight for price would be deliberately moderated to a level that ensures competitiveness without eclipsing the primary strategic objective. Best practices suggest that for most strategic procurements, price should not exceed 20-30% of the total score.

> The Strategic Evaluation Matrix ensures that every RFP is a direct reflection of a conscious strategic choice, not an echo of outdated, price-focused habits.

![Precisely balanced blue spheres on a beam and angular fulcrum, atop a white dome. This signifies RFQ protocol optimization for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution, price discovery, capital efficiency, and systemic equilibrium in multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-equilibrium-in-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## A Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Models

The table below illustrates how the evaluation criteria within an RFP must be re-architected to align with different SRM strategies. It contrasts a generic, misaligned model with two strategy-aligned models ▴ one for a ‘Cost Leadership’ SRM strategy and one for a ‘Technology Partnership’ SRM strategy.

| Evaluation Criterion | Generic (Misaligned) Model Weight | Aligned ‘Cost Leadership’ Model Weight | Aligned ‘Technology Partnership’ Model Weight |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Unit Price / Total Cost of Ownership | 50% | 40% | 15% |
| Compliance with Technical Specifications | 25% | 30% | 20% |
| Financial Stability | 10% | 15% | 10% |
| Past Performance / References | 15% | 15% | 10% |
| Innovation Capability / R&D Roadmap | 0% | 0% | 25% |
| Cultural Fit / Collaborative Approach | 0% | 0% | 10% |
| Scalability and Agility | 0% | 0% | 10% |

This comparison makes the strategic trade-offs explicit. The generic model, by heavily overweighting price, will almost always select a supplier who is unsuited for a technology partnership. The aligned models, conversely, are calibrated to identify the supplier profile that best matches the declared strategic need. Implementing this requires discipline and a willingness to defend the strategic weighting against internal pressures for short-term cost savings.

It also necessitates a more sophisticated scoring methodology. Using a simple 1-3 scale is insufficient; a 5 or 10-point scale allows for greater nuance and differentiation between proposals, especially on qualitative criteria.

![A centralized intelligence layer for institutional digital asset derivatives, visually connected by translucent RFQ protocols. This Prime RFQ facilitates high-fidelity execution and private quotation for block trades, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine.jpg)

## Embedding the Framework into the Procurement Operating Rhythm

A strategy document is useless if it is not operationalized. The strategic framework must be embedded into the day-to-day workflow of the procurement team. This involves several key actions:

- **Mandatory Strategy Selection** ▴ No RFP can be initiated without the sourcing manager first selecting the guiding SRM strategy (e.g. Cost, Partnership, Innovation) from a defined list.

- **Automated Template Deployment** ▴ The selection of the strategy should automatically populate the RFP with the corresponding [evaluation matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and weighting model. This reduces manual error and ensures consistency.

- **Cross-Functional Review Boards** ▴ For high-value or strategic RFPs, a cross-functional review board must approve the evaluation criteria before the RFP is issued. This builds consensus and shared accountability.

- **Training and Development** ▴ Procurement professionals must be trained not just on how to run an RFP, but on how to think strategically about supplier selection. They need to understand the business implications of different evaluation models.

This strategic approach transforms the RFP from a simple procurement tool into a powerful instrument of corporate strategy. It ensures that the organization’s supply base is not just a collection of vendors, but a curated ecosystem of partners, each selected to play a specific and valuable role in achieving the company’s long-term objectives. It is a fundamental shift from a reactive, price-driven process to a proactive, value-driven one.

![Intricate metallic components signify system precision engineering. These structured elements symbolize institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-engineering-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-latency-optimization.jpg)

![Precision-engineered, stacked components embody a Principal OS for institutional digital asset derivatives. This multi-layered structure visually represents market microstructure elements within RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-os-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Execution

The successful execution of a strategy that aligns Supplier [Relationship Management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/relationship-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SRM) with Request for Proposal (RFP) evaluation hinges on the implementation of a rigorous, disciplined, and transparent operational protocol. This protocol is the machinery that translates strategic intent into consistent, defensible sourcing decisions. It moves the organization from a state of ad-hoc, personality-driven evaluations to a system-driven process that ensures the integrity of every sourcing event. The foundation of this protocol is the establishment of a clear governance structure and the meticulous design of the evaluation mechanics.

At the execution level, the primary risk of misalignment stems from ambiguity and bias. To counter this, the first operational step is the formal chartering of an RFP Evaluation Committee for any significant sourcing project. This committee must be cross-functional, drawing members from procurement, the primary business unit stakeholder, finance, and potentially legal or IT, depending on the procurement’s nature. This structure accomplishes two goals ▴ it ensures that the evaluation criteria are viewed from multiple perspectives, and it distributes accountability for the final decision.

The committee’s first task is to formally ratify the evaluation scorecard, which has been pre-populated based on the chosen SRM strategy. This act of formal ratification, before any proposals are opened, is a critical control point. It prevents the common pitfall of adjusting criteria or weights after seeing supplier submissions, a practice that introduces bias and undermines the fairness of the process.

![A sleek, conical precision instrument, with a vibrant mint-green tip and a robust grey base, represents the cutting-edge of institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its sharp point signifies price discovery and best execution within complex market microstructure, powered by RFQ protocols for dark liquidity access and capital efficiency in atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-price-discovery-optimization-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## The Mechanics of a Weighted Scoring System

The heart of the execution protocol is the [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) system. This is where the strategic weights defined in the framework are applied to the actual supplier responses. The design of this system must be both robust and transparent. Each major criterion in the scorecard is broken down into a set of specific, observable questions or data points requested in the RFP.

The evaluation committee must agree on a clear scoring scale (e.g. 1 to 5, or 1 to 10) and, crucially, define what each point on that scale means for each criterion. This is known as creating a scoring rubric.

For example, for a qualitative criterion like “Innovation Capability,” the rubric might look like this:

- **Score of 1** ▴ Supplier has no dedicated R&D function and no documented product roadmap.

- **Score of 3** ▴ Supplier has a documented product roadmap and a small R&D team, but no history of collaborative innovation.

- **Score of 5** ▴ Supplier demonstrates significant R&D investment, holds relevant patents, provides a multi-year roadmap with clear alignment to our needs, and provides multiple case studies of successful co-innovation with other clients.

This level of definition constrains subjective interpretation and forces evaluators to justify their scores based on the evidence presented in the proposal. It transforms an abstract concept into a measurable attribute. The process must also enforce the separation of price evaluation from the evaluation of qualitative factors to prevent ‘lower bid bias,’ where knowledge of a low price unconsciously inflates the scores given to other aspects of that supplier’s proposal. Operationally, this means the technical/qualitative evaluation should be completed and scores finalized before the pricing envelopes are opened and scored by a separate, designated sub-team.

![A symmetrical, reflective apparatus with a glowing Intelligence Layer core, embodying a Principal's Core Trading Engine for Digital Asset Derivatives. Four sleek blades represent multi-leg spread execution, dark liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-execution.jpg)

## An Executable Weighted Scoring Model

The following table provides a detailed, executable model for a ‘Strategic Partnership’ RFP, demonstrating how high-level criteria are broken down and scored. This model assumes a total of 1,000 possible points.

| Category (Strategic Weight) | Specific Criterion | Max Points | Evaluation Method |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Strategic Fit (40%) | Alignment with our 5-Year Technology Roadmap | 150 | Analysis of supplier’s submitted roadmap and R&D plans. |
| Technical Capability (30%) | Platform Scalability and Security Certifications | 100 | Verification of certifications (e.g. ISO 27001) and performance data. |
| Commercial Viability (15%) | Financial Health and Stability | 75 | Third-party financial risk report analysis. |
| Pricing (15%) | Total Cost of Ownership (5-Year Model) | 150 | Formula-based scoring of a detailed pricing template. |

> A well-executed scoring protocol does not make the decision; it illuminates the decision by translating complex proposals into a clear, comparable, and strategy-aligned data set.

![A complex, intersecting arrangement of sleek, multi-colored blades illustrates institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols, aggregating dark liquidity, and enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/sophisticated-multi-asset-rfq-architecture-visualizing-institutional-digital-derivatives-execution-liquidity-aggregation-and-prime-os-orchestration-for-high-fidelity-performance.jpg)

## Consensus, Documentation, and Feedback Loops

The final stage of execution involves consolidating the scores and making a decision. A common failure mode is simply averaging the scores of all evaluators. A superior approach is to conduct a consensus meeting. In this meeting, the averaged scores are presented, but any criterion with a high variance in scores between evaluators is flagged for discussion.

A high variance often indicates a misunderstanding of the scoring rubric or a section of a supplier’s proposal that was unclear. This discussion allows the team to clarify these points and arrive at a more robust, collective judgment. The final decision, along with the detailed scoring sheets and the rationale for the consensus adjustments, must be formally documented. This documentation is vital for internal audits, for providing constructive feedback to the unsuccessful bidders, and for defending the decision against any challenges.

The execution protocol is incomplete without a feedback loop. The performance of the selected supplier must be monitored against the promises made in their proposal, using the SRM framework. Data from this ongoing performance management should be systematically collected and used to inform the next generation of RFP templates and evaluation criteria. Did the supplier who scored highly on ‘Innovation’ actually deliver new ideas?

Was the ‘[Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’ model accurate? This feedback loop turns procurement from a series of isolated transactions into a learning system, one that continually refines its ability to select the right partners to achieve its strategic goals.

![A geometric abstraction depicts a central multi-segmented disc intersected by angular teal and white structures, symbolizing a sophisticated Principal-driven RFQ protocol engine. This represents high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives like Bitcoin options, ensuring atomic settlement and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-prime-os.jpg)

## References

- Baily, Peter, et al. _Procurement, Principles & Management_. 11th ed. Pearson, 2015.

- Cousins, Paul D. et al. _Strategic Supply Management ▴ Principles, Theories and Practice_. Pearson Education, 2008.

- Gordon, S. R. _Supplier Evaluation and Performance Excellence ▴ A Guide to Meaningful Metrics and Successful Results_. J. Ross Publishing, 2008.

- Handfield, Robert B. et al. “Applying Environmental Criteria to Supplier Assessment ▴ A Study in the Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 141, no. 1, 2002, pp. 70-87.

- Monczka, Robert M. et al. _Purchasing and Supply Chain Management_. 7th ed. Cengage Learning, 2020.

- “The State of the RFP 2021.” Responsive (Formerly RFPio), 2021.

- “Supplier Relationship Management ▴ A State of Flux Report.” State of Flux, 2023.

- Tahriri, F. et al. “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company.” _Journal of Industrial Engineering International_, vol. 4, no. 7, 2008, pp. 53-68.

![Four sleek, rounded, modular components stack, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. Each unit represents a critical Prime RFQ layer, facilitating high-fidelity execution, aggregated inquiry, and sophisticated market microstructure for optimal price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-institutional-crypto-derivatives-trading-system-components.jpg)

## Reflection

![Intricate internal machinery reveals a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Precision components, including a multi-leg spread mechanism and data flow conduits, symbolize a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating atomic settlement and robust price discovery within a principal's Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## From Process to Systemic Capability

Viewing the alignment of supplier strategy and evaluation as a mere procedural task is to fundamentally misinterpret its significance. The protocols and frameworks discussed are not bureaucratic hurdles; they are the structural supports for a core organizational capability. This capability is the consistent, predictable translation of strategic intent into operational reality. An organization that masters this alignment has built more than a robust procurement process.

It has engineered a system for making high-fidelity decisions under conditions of complexity and uncertainty. The true measure of this system is not its efficiency in processing proposals, but its effectiveness in building a supply base that becomes a durable source of competitive advantage.

Therefore, the critical question for any leader is not whether their teams are following the RFP process. The more revealing inquiry is whether the procurement function, as a whole system, is learning. Does the outcome of a strategic partnership inform the criteria for the next one? Does a failure in supplier performance lead to a recalibration of the evaluation model that allowed that supplier to be selected?

Without these feedback loops, even the most well-designed framework becomes static and brittle. The goal is to create an adaptive system, one that perpetually refines its understanding of value and its ability to identify it in the marketplace. This transforms procurement from a cost center into an intelligence-gathering and strategy-enabling function of the highest order.

![Abstract visualization of an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its segmented core and reflective arcs depict advanced RFQ protocols, real-time price discovery, and dynamic market microstructure, optimizing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for block trades within a Principal's framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-interface.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/supplier-relationship-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Supplier Relationship Management

Meaning ▴ Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) defines a systematic framework for an institution to interact with and manage its external service providers and vendors. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-proposal/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Request for Proposal

Meaning ▴ A Request for Proposal, or RFP, constitutes a formal, structured solicitation document issued by an institutional entity seeking specific services, products, or solutions from prospective vendors. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, two-tone devices precisely stacked on a stable base represent an institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. This embodies layered RFQ protocols, enabling multi-leg spread execution and liquidity aggregation within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution, optimizing counterparty risk and market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-architecture.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/supplier-relationship/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, dark components with a bright turquoise data stream symbolize a Principal OS enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. This infrastructure leverages secure RFQ protocols, ensuring precise price discovery and minimal slippage across aggregated liquidity pools, vital for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-systemic-execution-interface.jpg)

## Supplier Relationship

Meaning ▴ Supplier Relationship, within the context of institutional digital asset derivatives, defines the structured and formalized engagement between a Principal and external entities that provide critical services, such as liquidity, technology infrastructure, custody, or prime brokerage. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A glossy, teal sphere, partially open, exposes precision-engineered metallic components and white internal modules. This represents an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling secure RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery of Digital Asset Derivatives, crucial for prime brokerage and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-revealing-core-rfq-protocol-mechanisms-for-optimized-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-rfp-scoring-and-long-term-supplier-relationship-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, futuristic apparatus featuring a central spherical processing unit flanked by dual reflective surfaces and illuminated data conduits. This system visually represents an advanced RFQ protocol engine facilitating high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-options-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-interface.jpg)

## Between Supplier Relationship Management

RFP scoring is the initial data calibration that defines the operational parameters for long-term supplier relationship management. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-requirements-traceability-matrix-and-an-rfp-compliance-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract visual depicts a central intelligent execution hub, symbolizing the core of a Principal's operational framework. Two intersecting planes represent multi-leg spread strategies and cross-asset liquidity pools, enabling private quotation and aggregated inquiry for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Strategic Evaluation Matrix

An RTM ensures a product is built right; an RFP Compliance Matrix proves a proposal is bid right. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract intersecting geometric forms, deep blue and light beige, represent advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms signify multi-leg execution strategies, principal liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic pricing against a textured global market sphere, reflecting robust market microstructure and intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-execution-algorithmic-pricing-global-liquidity-principal-trading-systemic-integration-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation Criteria define the structured framework employed by institutional entities to systematically assess vendor proposals for complex technology and service procurements, particularly within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives infrastructure, ensuring precise alignment with defined operational requirements and strategic objectives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic structures with glowing apertures symbolize institutional RFQ protocols. These represent high-fidelity execution and price discovery across aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-systems-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Matrix

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Matrix constitutes a structured analytical framework designed for the objective assessment of performance, risk, and operational efficiency across execution algorithms, trading strategies, or counterparty relationships within the institutional digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/relationship-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting multi-asset liquidity channels with an embedded intelligence layer define this precision-engineered framework. It symbolizes advanced institutional digital asset RFQ protocols, visualizing sophisticated market microstructure for high-fidelity execution, mitigating counterparty risk and enabling atomic settlement across crypto derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Relationship Management

Meaning ▴ Relationship Management, within the context of institutional digital asset derivatives, defines the structured framework governing an institution's interactions with its external counterparties, liquidity providers, technology vendors, and other critical market participants. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring defines a computational methodology where multiple input variables are assigned distinct coefficients or weights, reflecting their relative importance, before being aggregated into a single, composite metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent blue algorithmic execution module intersects beige cylindrical conduits, exposing precision market microstructure components. This institutional-grade system for digital asset derivatives enables high-fidelity execution of block trades and private quotation via an advanced RFQ protocol, ensuring optimal capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-core-execution-architecture-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Governance](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-governance/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [Supply Chain Resilience](https://options.greeks.live/area/supply-chain-resilience/), [Supplier Segmentation](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-segmentation/), [Total Cost](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost/), [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Defining the Scoring Scale in an RFP Evaluation Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-defining-the-scoring-scale-in-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix/)
![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

A robust RFP scoring scale translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for objective vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Setting Criteria Weights in a Weighted Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-setting-criteria-weights-in-a-weighted-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A sleek cream-colored device with a dark blue optical sensor embodies Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. It signifies High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, driven by an Intelligence Layer optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-engine-optimized-rfq-protocols-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

A weighted RFP scoring model translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible decision-making system.

- 
### [In What Ways Does a TCO-Driven RFP Change the Nature of Post-Contract Supplier Management and Performance Reviews?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-does-a-tco-driven-rfp-change-the-nature-of-post-contract-supplier-management-and-performance-reviews/)
![A reflective surface supports a sharp metallic element, stabilized by a sphere, alongside translucent teal prisms. This abstractly represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ protocol price discovery within a Prime RFQ, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and liquidity pool optimization.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

A TCO-driven RFP shifts post-contract management from price compliance to a collaborative, data-driven optimization of lifecycle value.

- 
### [How Can Weighted Scoring in an Rfp Mitigate the Risk of Adverse Selection?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-mitigate-the-risk-of-adverse-selection/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency. A metallic button suggests precise private quotation control.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

Weighted scoring mitigates adverse selection by translating strategic priorities into a quantitative framework that values holistic capability over low price.

- 
### [How Does Supplier Relationship Management Directly Impact Procurement Process Efficiency?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-supplier-relationship-management-directly-impact-procurement-process-efficiency/)
![A futuristic, intricate central mechanism with luminous blue accents represents a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives Price Discovery. Four sleek, curved panels extending outwards signify diverse Liquidity Pools and RFQ channels for Block Trade High-Fidelity Execution, minimizing Slippage and Latency in Market Microstructure operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-2.jpg)

Supplier Relationship Management codifies procurement, transforming it into a data-driven system that minimizes risk and maximizes value chain efficiency.

- 
### [When Is a Price-Focused Rfp Evaluation Model the More Appropriate Strategic Choice?](https://options.greeks.live/question/when-is-a-price-focused-rfp-evaluation-model-the-more-appropriate-strategic-choice/)
![A segmented rod traverses a multi-layered spherical structure, depicting a streamlined Institutional RFQ Protocol. This visual metaphor illustrates optimal Digital Asset Derivatives price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and robust liquidity pool integration, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow-1.jpg)

A price-focused RFP is the optimal choice when procuring a commoditized good or service with rigorously defined specifications.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Evaluating Rfp Responses in a Hybrid Procurement Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-evaluating-rfp-responses-in-a-hybrid-procurement-model/)
![A dark blue sphere and teal-hued circular elements on a segmented surface, bisected by a diagonal line. This visualizes institutional block trade aggregation, algorithmic price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Principal's Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk for digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/market-microstructure-driven-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

A robust RFP evaluation in a hybrid model is a system for modeling a vendor's long-term integration and value contribution.

- 
### [What Are the Most Important Kpis for Measuring Rfp Success?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-important-kpis-for-measuring-rfp-success/)
![A precise stack of multi-layered circular components visually representing a sophisticated Principal Digital Asset RFQ framework. Each distinct layer signifies a critical component within market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying liquidity aggregation across dark pools, enabling private quotation and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-layers-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Measuring RFP success requires a system that quantifies total value delivered, not just initial cost avoided.

- 
### [How Can Organizations Effectively Mediate Conflicts between Stakeholder Priorities during Rfp Weighting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-organizations-effectively-mediate-conflicts-between-stakeholder-priorities-during-rfp-weighting/)
![A precision mechanism, potentially a component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases intricate Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution. Transparent elements suggest Price Discovery and Latent Liquidity within RFQ Protocols. Its robust design implies Capital Efficiency and minimized Slippage for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Effective stakeholder conflict mediation in RFP weighting is achieved by architecting a quantitative, transparent decision-making system.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Primary Risks of Misaligning Srm Strategy and Rfp Evaluation Criteria?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-of-misaligning-srm-strategy-and-rfp-evaluation-criteria/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-of-misaligning-srm-strategy-and-rfp-evaluation-criteria/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Primary Risks of Misaligning Srm Strategy and Rfp Evaluation Criteria? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Misalignment of SRM strategy and RFP evaluation creates systemic value erosion by selecting operationally and culturally incompatible suppliers. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-of-misaligning-srm-strategy-and-rfp-evaluation-criteria/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T00:52:19+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T00:52:27+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-equilibrium-in-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols.jpg",
        "caption": "Blue spheres, a grey beam, and angular fulcrum precisely balance on a large white dome. This composition metaphorically represents the market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery. It underscores capital efficiency in multi-leg spreads and block trades, with quantitative analysis and risk management vital for systemic equilibrium on a Prime RFQ."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Cross-Functional Collaboration",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Evaluation Matrix",
        "Procurement Risk",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Relationship Management",
        "Request for Proposal",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Governance",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Performance Management",
        "Supplier Relationship",
        "Supplier Relationship Management",
        "Supplier Segmentation",
        "Supply Chain Resilience",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Value Leakage",
        "Weighted Scoring",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-of-misaligning-srm-strategy-and-rfp-evaluation-criteria/
