# What Are the Primary Technical Challenges of Reporting Nia Electronic Rfq Responses to Cat? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-01
**Categories:** Question

---

![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Concept

The core operational challenge in reporting Non-Immediately Actionable (NIA) electronic Request for Quote (RFQ) responses to the [Consolidated Audit Trail](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consolidated-audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CAT) originates from a fundamental architectural mismatch. You are being asked to fit a fluid, bilateral negotiation into a rigid, event-based surveillance framework. The system is attempting to capture the ghost in the machine ▴ the indicative pricing dialogue that precedes a formal order. This is an exercise in translating a conversation, with all its context and nuance, into a series of discrete, machine-readable data points that satisfy the [CAT NMS Plan](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cat-nms-plan/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’s mandate for a complete lifecycle record of all trading activity.

An NIA RFQ response is an indication of interest provided electronically by a market maker or liquidity provider. It contains pricing and size information, yet it cannot be immediately executed by the solicitor. The response functions as a signal, an invitation to transact, contingent on further action from both parties. The CAT framework, conversely, is built upon the concept of concrete, reportable events such as the creation, routing, modification, and cancellation of an order.

It demands a clear [audit trail](https://prime.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of events that have a direct, causal relationship with potential executions. The difficulty arises because the NIA response exists in a liminal state. It is more structured than a verbal quote over the phone but less firm than a limit order resting on a public exchange. This ambiguity is the source of the technical friction.

> The central problem is mapping the unstructured dialogue of bilateral price discovery onto the highly structured, event-driven architecture of the Consolidated Audit Trail.

This is not a simple data-formatting problem. It is a conceptual puzzle that forces firms to deconstruct their trading workflows and reassemble them in a way that aligns with the regulator’s view of the market. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) itself has acknowledged this complexity by granting a temporary conditional exemption for reporting these responses until July 31, 2026.

This relief provides the necessary time for the industry to develop the technological and procedural infrastructure required for compliance. The challenge you face is architecting a system that can listen to these electronic conversations, identify the specific moments that constitute a reportable “bid or offer” under CAT rules, and capture them with complete accuracy, all without disrupting the sensitive, high-touch nature of RFQ-based trading.

![Precision-engineered modular components, with transparent elements and metallic conduits, depict a robust RFQ Protocol engine. This architecture facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling efficient liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## What Defines a Reportable Event in an RFQ Dialogue?

A primary source of technical complexity is the very definition of a reportable event within the lifecycle of an RFQ. In a standard order-driven market, events are unambiguous. An order is sent, it is acknowledged, it is routed, it is executed, or it is cancelled. Each step is a discrete, timestamped event.

An RFQ dialogue is different. It can involve multiple back-and-forth messages, revised quotes, and expressions of interest that never materialize into a tradable order. The technical challenge is to build a system with the logic to parse this stream of communication and isolate the specific message that FINRA would consider a “bid or offer.”

The [Financial Information Forum](https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-information-forum/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (FIF) has highlighted the confusion surrounding the term “actionable,” noting that its definition within the CAT Technical Specifications differs from its use in Regulation NMS. This semantic ambiguity creates significant implementation risk. A firm’s system must codify a specific interpretation of these rules into its reporting logic. For example, if a dealer responds to an RFQ with a price that is explicitly “subject to final confirmation,” is that a reportable offer?

The system must be designed to make this determination consistently and defensibly. This requires a sophisticated rules engine that can analyze the content of the message, its context within the dialogue, and the specific platform’s protocol to classify it correctly.

The solution involves creating a new data abstraction layer that sits between the RFQ platforms and the [CAT reporting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cat-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) engine. This layer must be capable of:

- **Ingesting** data from a heterogeneous mix of sources, including proprietary APIs, third-party RFQ platforms, and even structured data from chat logs.

- **Normalizing** this data into a consistent internal format that captures the essential elements of the quote.

- **Applying** a set of business rules to determine the reportability of each message.

- **Enriching** the data with the necessary metadata, such as timestamps, participant identifiers, and linkage to the original RFQ.

Building this abstraction layer is a significant software engineering undertaking. It requires deep expertise in both trading protocols and [data architecture](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to ensure that the system is both compliant and performant.

![A metallic, circular mechanism, a precision control interface, rests on a dark circuit board. This symbolizes the core intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ, enabling low-latency, high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via optimized RFQ protocols, refining market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![Geometric panels, light and dark, interlocked by a luminous diagonal, depict an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Central nodes symbolize liquidity aggregation and price discovery within a Principal's execution management system, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-1.jpg)

## Strategy

Addressing the reporting requirements for NIA RFQ responses demands a strategic approach that balances immediate compliance obligations with long-term architectural stability. The SEC’s temporary exemption until mid-2026 is not a reprieve from action; it is a mandated planning and development window. Firms must use this time to formulate a coherent strategy that treats this challenge as a core component of their data architecture, rather than a peripheral compliance task.

A reactive, tactical approach will likely result in a brittle, high-cost solution that creates operational risk. A strategic approach, conversely, views this as an opportunity to enhance [data governance](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and streamline reporting workflows across the organization.

The first strategic decision is to define the scope and philosophy of the project. Will the firm build a bespoke solution, buy a vendor product, or pursue a hybrid model? This decision hinges on several factors ▴ the complexity of the firm’s existing RFQ workflows, the diversity of platforms used, and the in-house technical expertise available. A firm that relies heavily on a small number of standardized RFQ platforms may find a vendor solution to be cost-effective.

A firm with highly customized, proprietary RFQ systems may have no choice but to build its own solution. In either case, the strategic goal is to implement a system that is scalable, adaptable, and auditable.

> A firm’s strategy must evolve from merely satisfying the mandate to architecting a data system that provides a durable competitive advantage through superior data governance.

The timeline provided by regulators dictates the strategic roadmap. A written implementation plan must be submitted by July 31, 2025. This document must be a credible, detailed blueprint that outlines the firm’s approach, key milestones, and testing procedures. This requires that the strategic planning phase be completed well in advance of this deadline.

The period between the plan submission and the July 31, 2026, go-live date is for execution, testing, and refinement. A sound strategy will front-load the design and architecture work to ensure that the implementation phase is focused on building and integrating, not on last-minute problem-solving.

![A translucent digital asset derivative, like a multi-leg spread, precisely penetrates a bisected institutional trading platform. This reveals intricate market microstructure, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and aggregated liquidity, crucial for optimal RFQ price discovery within a Principal's Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-microstructure.jpg)

## How Should Firms Approach the Build versus Buy Decision?

The decision to build a custom reporting solution or purchase a third-party product is a critical strategic inflection point. There is no single correct answer; the optimal path depends on the firm’s specific operational footprint, technological maturity, and risk appetite. A thorough analysis requires looking beyond the initial software acquisition cost to consider the total cost of ownership, including integration, maintenance, and future adaptation.

A bespoke solution offers the highest degree of control and customization. It can be tailored precisely to the firm’s existing systems and unique trading protocols. This approach is most suitable for institutions with significant in-house engineering talent and highly complex, proprietary RFQ environments.

The primary strategic benefit is the creation of a proprietary asset that can be adapted quickly to future regulatory changes or business needs. The downside is the significant upfront investment in time and resources, as well as the ongoing burden of maintenance and support.

A vendor solution, on the other hand, can offer a faster path to compliance. Specialized providers can leverage their experience across multiple clients to offer a pre-built, robust solution that addresses the core requirements of the mandate. The strategic advantage here is speed to market and a potential reduction in internal resource strain. The trade-off is a potential lack of flexibility.

The firm may need to adapt its internal workflows to the vendor’s data model, and customization can be costly or limited. Furthermore, reliance on a third party introduces a new layer of operational risk that must be managed through rigorous due diligence and strong service-level agreements.

The table below outlines a strategic framework for evaluating these two paths:

| Evaluation Criterion | Custom Build Strategy | Vendor Purchase Strategy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Control and Customization | Complete control over features, data models, and integration points. Tailored to specific proprietary workflows. | Limited to vendor’s product roadmap and configuration options. May require process adaptation. |
| Speed to Implementation | Slower initial deployment due to full development lifecycle (design, build, test). | Faster initial deployment, as the core product is already built. Focus is on integration and configuration. |
| Resource Allocation | Requires significant internal engineering, project management, and subject matter expertise. | Shifts resource burden to vendor management, due diligence, and integration oversight. |
| Total Cost of Ownership | High upfront capital expenditure. Ongoing costs for maintenance, support, and future development. | Lower upfront cost, but includes recurring license fees. Potential for high costs for customization or support. |
| Adaptability to Change | High. Can be quickly adapted to new regulations or business strategies by the internal team. | Dependent on the vendor’s development priorities and release cycles. May lag behind market changes. |
| Competitive Differentiation | Potential to create a proprietary data architecture that serves as a strategic asset. | Unlikely to provide a competitive edge, as peers can purchase the same system. |

![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## Managing Implementation Risk

Regardless of the chosen path, managing implementation risk is paramount. The consequences of failed or inaccurate CAT reporting are severe, including substantial fines and reputational damage. A strategic approach to risk management involves several key pillars:

- **Phased Rollout** ▴ The system should be implemented in phases, starting with a single RFQ platform or asset class. This allows the team to identify and resolve issues on a smaller scale before a full-scale deployment.

- **Robust Testing** ▴ A comprehensive testing strategy is essential. This includes not only technical testing of the data pipeline but also user acceptance testing with traders and compliance officers to ensure the system’s logic aligns with real-world scenarios. Parallel runs, where the new system operates alongside existing processes, can provide a valuable baseline for comparison.

- **Data Governance** ▴ Strong data governance must be established from the outset. This means clearly defining data ownership, establishing data quality metrics, and creating a formal process for investigating and remediating errors. The 72-hour error correction window required by CAT means that these processes must be highly efficient.

- **Stakeholder Engagement** ▴ The project must have buy-in from all key stakeholders, including the trading desk, technology, compliance, and senior management. Regular communication and clear documentation are essential to ensure that everyone understands the project’s goals, progress, and their respective responsibilities.

Ultimately, the strategy must be grounded in the reality that this is a permanent change to the market’s data infrastructure. The solution needs to be robust, scalable, and defensible under regulatory scrutiny. The firms that approach this challenge strategically will not only achieve compliance but also build a more resilient and data-driven organization.

![A precise optical sensor within an institutional-grade execution management system, representing a Prime RFQ intelligence layer. This enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-lens.jpg)

![An exposed high-fidelity execution engine reveals the complex market microstructure of an institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS. Precision components facilitate smart order routing and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase for NIA RFQ reporting is where strategic theory confronts operational reality. It is a complex undertaking in data engineering, requiring the precise orchestration of multiple technical components to capture, process, and report data that is currently ephemeral and context-dependent. Success hinges on a granular understanding of the data’s lifecycle, from its origination on a trading platform to its final submission to the CAT central repository. This process must be meticulously designed and rigorously tested to ensure it can withstand the dual pressures of high data volumes and stringent regulatory deadlines.

The core of the execution challenge can be broken down into three distinct technical domains ▴ data acquisition and normalization, [event processing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/event-processing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and linkage, and error management and reconciliation. Each of these domains presents its own set of problems that must be solved through a combination of sophisticated software architecture, robust data management practices, and a deep understanding of the underlying trading workflows. The system must be designed for precision and resilience, capable of processing billions of messages and identifying the small subset that constitutes a reportable event, all while maintaining a complete and auditable record of its decisions.

> Executing on this mandate requires building a high-fidelity data processing pipeline capable of transforming unstructured communication into structured, reportable events with near-perfect accuracy.

A critical component of the execution plan is the development of a detailed technical specifications document. This document serves as the blueprint for the engineering team, translating the abstract requirements of the CAT NMS Plan into concrete implementation details. It must specify the data formats for each source system, the transformation logic to be applied, the rules for event classification, the schema for the internal data store, and the exact format of the final CAT report. This document is the foundation upon which the entire system is built, and its clarity and completeness are essential for a successful outcome.

![A gleaming, translucent sphere with intricate internal mechanisms, flanked by precision metallic probes, symbolizes a sophisticated Principal's RFQ engine. This represents the atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies, enabling high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives markets, minimizing latency and slippage for optimal alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/inst-digital-asset-deriv-rfq-os-for-optimal-high-fidelity-trade-exec.jpg)

## Data Acquisition and Normalization the First Mile Problem

The initial and perhaps most complex hurdle is the acquisition of data from a multitude of RFQ sources. These platforms were designed for efficient communication between traders, not for standardized data extraction for regulatory reporting. Consequently, firms are faced with a heterogeneous landscape of APIs, protocols, and data formats.

Some platforms may offer modern, well-documented REST or FIX APIs, while others may require parsing structured text from log files or even screen-scraping from a graphical user interface. This is the “first mile” problem of data engineering ▴ getting the raw data into a controlled environment where it can be processed.

The execution team must build a suite of connectors, one for each RFQ source. Each connector is a specialized piece of software responsible for:

- **Connecting** to the source system using its specific protocol (e.g. HTTPS, FIX, sFTP).

- **Authenticating** securely to gain access to the data.

- **Extracting** the relevant messages, including the RFQ itself and all subsequent responses.

- **Transforming** the source-specific data format into a standardized, internal representation (a canonical data model).

This normalization step is critical. The canonical data model must be rich enough to capture all the necessary information from every source system, including timestamps (with microsecond precision), participant identifiers, instrument details, price, quantity, and any qualifying text (e.g. “subject to,” “for indication only”). Creating this unified view is a significant architectural challenge that pays dividends in the later stages of processing, as the core logic of the system can operate on a single, consistent data structure.

![Sleek metallic system component with intersecting translucent fins, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and gamma exposure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Event Processing and Linkage the Core Logic

Once the data has been acquired and normalized, the core processing engine must analyze it to identify reportable events and link them together into a coherent audit trail. This is where the business logic, informed by the firm’s interpretation of the CAT rules, is applied. The engine must perform two key functions ▴ event classification and entity linkage.

Event classification involves applying a rules-based system to determine if a given message constitutes a reportable NIA RFQ response. This logic can be complex, taking into account keywords, message structure, and the sequence of the dialogue. For example, a rule might state ▴ “If a message from a liquidity provider in response to a valid RFQ contains a symbol, a side, a price, and a quantity, and does not contain the phrase ‘firm until,’ classify it as a reportable NIA response.”

Entity linkage is the process of connecting related events. The system must be able to link each response back to the original RFQ that solicited it. Furthermore, if an RFQ dialogue ultimately results in an order being sent to the market, the system must be able to link the NIA responses to that subsequent order.

This is essential for providing regulators with a complete picture of the trading lifecycle. This linkage often requires sophisticated correlation logic, using a combination of a platform-provided identifiers and internally generated correlation IDs to tie the disparate events together.

The table below provides a simplified example of the data transformation and enrichment that must occur during the execution phase.

| Raw Platform Message | Normalized Data Record | Enriched CAT Event |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Source ▴ RFQ Platform A Message ▴ “User123 RFQ for 100k XYZ @ MKT. Resp from LP456 ▴ ‘Indicative price 10.50 for 100k'” | { “source” ▴ “PlatformA”, “timestamp” ▴ “2025-08-01T13:45:01.123456Z”, “type” ▴ “Response”, “solicitor” ▴ “User123”, “responder” ▴ “LP456”, “symbol” ▴ “XYZ”, “price” ▴ 10.50, “size” ▴ 100000, “is_firm” ▴ false } | { “eventTimestamp” ▴ “20250801134501123456”, “firmReportableID” ▴ “XYZ-20250801-A1B2”, “eventType” ▴ “MENI”, “symbol” ▴ “XYZ”, “sender” ▴ “LP456_MPID”, “receiver” ▴ “FIRM_MPID”, “price” ▴ 10.50, “quantity” ▴ 100000, “side” ▴ “Buy”, “rfqID” ▴ “RFQ-XYZ-001” } |
| Source ▴ Proprietary Chat Message ▴ ” TRADER_A to LP_B ▴ any interest in 500k ABC? LP_B to TRADER_A ▴ can show you 15.25 on 500k, good for a moment” | { “source” ▴ “PropChat”, “timestamp” ▴ “2025-08-01T13:46:05.000000Z”, “type” ▴ “Response”, “solicitor” ▴ “TRADER_A”, “responder” ▴ “LP_B”, “symbol” ▴ “ABC”, “price” ▴ 15.25, “size” ▴ 500000, “is_firm” ▴ false } | { “eventTimestamp” ▴ “20250801134605000000”, “firmReportableID” ▴ “ABC-20250801-C3D4”, “eventType” ▴ “MENI”, “symbol” ▴ “ABC”, “sender” ▴ “LP_B_MPID”, “receiver” ▴ “FIRM_MPID”, “price” ▴ 15.25, “quantity” ▴ 500000, “side” ▴ “Sell”, “rfqID” ▴ “RFQ-ABC-002” } |

This table illustrates the journey from unstructured or semi-structured raw data to a fully compliant CAT event record. The execution system must perform this transformation reliably for millions of messages per day, creating a significant engineering and operational challenge.

![A metallic, reflective disc, symbolizing a digital asset derivative or tokenized contract, rests on an intricate Principal's operational framework. This visualizes the market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital assets, emphasizing RFQ protocol precision, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-infrastructure.jpg)

## References

- Oyster Consulting. “CAT Reporting Exemption ▴ Relief for Electronic Quote Responses.” Oyster Consulting, 2024.

- FINRA. “CAT NMS Plan FAQ.” CATNMSPLAN.com, 2024.

- Sosuv Consulting. “Navigating the Risks and Challenges of FINRA CAT Reporting.” Sosuv Consulting, 2024.

- Financial Information Forum. “Re ▴ Reporting of non-executable RFQ responses to CAT.” FIF, 16 November 2023.

- SIFMA. “A Firm’s Guide to the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT).” SIFMA, August 2019.

![A detailed view of an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading interface, featuring a central liquidity pool visualization through a clear, tinted disc. Subtle market microstructure elements are visible, suggesting real-time price discovery and order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-display.jpg)

## Reflection

The mandate to report NIA electronic RFQ responses to CAT forces a necessary evolution in a firm’s data architecture. It compels a shift from viewing regulatory reporting as a series of discrete, siloed obligations to seeing it as a unified data engineering challenge. The technical systems you build to solve this specific problem should be designed as modules within a larger, more coherent data strategy.

Consider how the data ingestion, normalization, and linkage capabilities developed for this purpose can be leveraged for other functions, such as best execution analysis, transaction cost analysis, or internal surveillance. The ultimate goal is to transform a compliance requirement into a strategic asset, creating a data infrastructure that is not only compliant but also provides a clearer, more granular view of your firm’s own trading activity.

![A central illuminated hub with four light beams forming an 'X' against dark geometric planes. This embodies a Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating RFQ liquidity across diverse venues for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-orchestrating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consolidated-audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex core mechanism with two structured arms illustrates a Principal Crypto Derivatives OS executing RFQ protocols. This system enables price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives block trades, optimizing market microstructure and capital efficiency via private quotations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-system.jpg)

## Consolidated Audit Trail

Meaning ▴ The Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) is a comprehensive, centralized database designed to capture and track every order, quote, and trade across US equity and options markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cat-nms-plan/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, metallic components with reflective blue surfaces depict an advanced institutional RFQ protocol. Its central pivot and radiating arms symbolize aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution, optimizing order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Cat Nms Plan

Meaning ▴ The Consolidated Audit Trail National Market System Plan, or CAT NMS Plan, establishes a centralized repository for granular order and trade data across U.S. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A segmented circular diagram, split diagonally. Its core, with blue rings, represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer driving High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-speed-prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution.jpg)

## Audit Trail

Meaning ▴ An Audit Trail is a chronological, immutable record of system activities, operations, or transactions within a digital environment, detailing event sequence, user identification, timestamps, and specific actions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-information-forum/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Financial Information Forum

Meaning ▴ The Financial Information Forum (FIF) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the communication and processing of financial information among market participants. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cat-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek pen hovers over a luminous circular structure with teal internal components, symbolizing precise RFQ initiation. This represents high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure and achieving atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ liquidity pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-through-prime-os-precision.jpg)

## Cat Reporting

Meaning ▴ CAT Reporting, or Consolidated Audit Trail Reporting, mandates the comprehensive capture and reporting of all order and trade events across US equity and and options markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic module with a dark, reflective sphere sits atop a cylindrical base, symbolizing an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This system processes aggregated inquiries for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads while managing gamma exposure and slippage within dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Data Architecture

Meaning ▴ Data Architecture defines the formal structure of an organization's data assets, establishing models, policies, rules, and standards that govern the collection, storage, arrangement, integration, and utilization of data. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, modular infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its intersecting elements symbolize integrated RFQ protocols, facilitating high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across complex multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-optimizing-high-fidelity-block-trade-liquidity-and-multi-leg-spread-precision.jpg)

## Data Governance

Meaning ▴ Data Governance establishes a comprehensive framework of policies, processes, and standards designed to manage an organization's data assets effectively. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/event-processing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Circular forms symbolize digital asset liquidity pools, precisely intersected by an RFQ execution conduit. Angular planes define algorithmic trading parameters for block trade segmentation, facilitating price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-digital-asset-rfq-execution-latent-liquidity-capture-protocol.jpg)

## Event Processing

Meaning ▴ Event Processing represents a computational paradigm centered on the real-time ingestion, analysis, and reaction to discrete occurrences or "events" as they happen within a system. </a>

**Tags:** [Data Linkage](https://options.greeks.live/area/data-linkage/), [FINRA CAT Reporting](https://options.greeks.live/area/finra-cat-reporting/), [NIA Reporting](https://options.greeks.live/area/nia-reporting/), [Non-Immediately Actionable RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-immediately-actionable-rfq/), [CAT NMS Plan](https://options.greeks.live/area/cat-nms-plan/), [Consolidated Audit Trail](https://options.greeks.live/area/consolidated-audit-trail/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Technological Frameworks Support High-Fidelity CAT Quote Data Submission?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-technological-frameworks-support-high-fidelity-cat-quote-data-submission/)
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

High-fidelity CAT quote data submission leverages integrated systems and precise timestamping for unparalleled market oversight and strategic insight.

- 
### [What Technological Architectures Support Compliant Delayed Block Trade Reporting for Institutional Investors?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-technological-architectures-support-compliant-delayed-block-trade-reporting-for-institutional-investors/)
![A transparent, convex lens, intersected by angled beige, black, and teal bars, embodies institutional liquidity pool and market microstructure. This signifies RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives and multi-leg options spreads, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement via Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

Advanced architectures integrate automated systems, RegTech, and standardized protocols to ensure compliant, discreet delayed block trade reporting.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Challenges in Normalizing Block Trade Data across Different Asset Classes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-challenges-in-normalizing-block-trade-data-across-different-asset-classes/)
![Central, interlocked mechanical structures symbolize a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS driving institutional RFQ protocol. Surrounding blades represent diverse liquidity pools and multi-leg spread components. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and algorithmic trading within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools.jpg)

Normalizing block trade data across asset classes is a translation challenge, creating a unified language for risk and opportunity.

- 
### [Can a Firm Leverage Its MiFID II Reporting Infrastructure to Meet CAT Requirements Cost-Effectively?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-firm-leverage-its-mifid-ii-reporting-infrastructure-to-meet-cat-requirements-cost-effectively/)
![Abstract geometric forms, symbolizing bilateral quotation and multi-leg spread components, precisely interact with robust institutional-grade infrastructure. This represents a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating high-fidelity execution via an RFQ workflow, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-infrastructure.jpg)

A firm can cost-effectively meet CAT requirements by leveraging its MiFID II data governance as a blueprint for a unified, event-driven architecture.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Data Governance Challenges in Unifying MiFID II and CAT Reporting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-data-governance-challenges-in-unifying-mifid-ii-and-cat-reporting/)
![A sleek, light interface, a Principal's Prime RFQ, overlays a dark, intricate market microstructure. This represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, showcasing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols. It signifies optimized liquidity aggregation, algorithmic trading, and capital efficiency for block trades and multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-system.jpg)

Unifying MiFID II and CAT reporting is an architectural challenge of harmonizing disparate regulatory data models and philosophies.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between Oats Reporting and Cat Reporting Supervision?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-oats-reporting-and-cat-reporting-supervision/)
![Glossy, intersecting forms in beige, blue, and teal embody RFQ protocol efficiency, atomic settlement, and aggregated liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sleek design reflects high-fidelity execution, prime brokerage capabilities, and optimized order book dynamics for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-principal-operational-frameworks.jpg)

CAT provides a comprehensive, cross-market surveillance architecture, superseding OATS with broader scope, deeper data granularity, and stricter supervisory requirements.

- 
### [Can the Data Collected for CAT RFQ Reporting Be Used to Analyze Liquidity Provider Performance?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-the-data-collected-for-cat-rfq-reporting-be-used-to-analyze-liquidity-provider-performance/)
![A layered, spherical structure reveals an inner metallic ring with intricate patterns, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocol logic. A central teal dome represents a deep liquidity pool and precise price discovery, encased within robust institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-orchestrating-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-multi-asset-liquidity.jpg)

CAT RFQ data offers the technical means for deep liquidity provider analysis, yet its use is strictly prohibited for commercial purposes.

- 
### [What Are the Technological Challenges for Brokers When Implementing New Market Regulations like MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-technological-challenges-for-brokers-when-implementing-new-market-regulations-like-mifid-ii/)
![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution. It highlights High-Fidelity Execution, Atomic Settlement, and Capital Efficiency within a Principal's Operational Framework for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

MiFID II's core technological challenge is the architectural re-engineering of siloed systems into a unified, high-fidelity data fabric.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Technological Challenges in Building a Consolidated Audit Trail Reporting System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-technological-challenges-in-building-a-consolidated-audit-trail-reporting-system/)
![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

A Consolidated Audit Trail system's core challenge is engineering a secure, high-volume data pipeline for the entire market.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Are the Primary Technical Challenges of Reporting Nia Electronic Rfq Responses to Cat?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-technical-challenges-of-reporting-nia-electronic-rfq-responses-to-cat/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-technical-challenges-of-reporting-nia-electronic-rfq-responses-to-cat/"
    },
    "headline": "What Are the Primary Technical Challenges of Reporting Nia Electronic Rfq Responses to Cat? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The primary technical challenge is architecting a system to capture, normalize, and link ephemeral, non-executable quotes to auditable CAT events. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-technical-challenges-of-reporting-nia-electronic-rfq-responses-to-cat/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-01T13:50:37+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-01T13:50:39+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated mechanical component with a reflective metallic blade through its central aperture, marked with technical identifiers, illustrates institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. This embodies a multi-dealer RFQ platform's engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution and price discovery via algorithmic trading. Its precision signifies market microstructure optimization, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage and latency for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ. This is crucial for quantitative analysis."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Audit Trail",
        "CAT NMS Plan",
        "CAT Reporting",
        "Compliance Architecture",
        "Consolidated Audit Trail",
        "Data Architecture",
        "Data Governance",
        "Data Linkage",
        "Data Normalization",
        "Event Processing",
        "Financial Information Forum",
        "FINRA CAT Reporting",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "NIA Reporting",
        "Non-Immediately Actionable RFQ",
        "Regulatory Technology",
        "RFQ Workflow",
        "SEC Rule 613"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Defines A Reportable Event In An RFQ Dialogue?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "A primary source of technical complexity is the very definition of a reportable event within the lifecycle of an RFQ. In a standard order-driven market, events are unambiguous. An order is sent, it is acknowledged, it is routed, it is executed, or it is cancelled. Each step is a discrete, timestamped event. An RFQ dialogue is different. It can involve multiple back-and-forth messages, revised quotes, and expressions of interest that never materialize into a tradable order. The technical challenge is to build a system with the logic to parse this stream of communication and isolate the specific message that FINRA would consider a \"bid or offer.\""
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Should Firms Approach The Build Versus Buy Decision?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The decision to build a custom reporting solution or purchase a third-party product is a critical strategic inflection point. There is no single correct answer; the optimal path depends on the firm's specific operational footprint, technological maturity, and risk appetite. A thorough analysis requires looking beyond the initial software acquisition cost to consider the total cost of ownership, including integration, maintenance, and future adaptation."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-technical-challenges-of-reporting-nia-electronic-rfq-responses-to-cat/
