# What Is the Best Method for a Committee to Agree on RFP Criteria Weights? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![Translucent teal glass pyramid and flat pane, geometrically aligned on a dark base, symbolize market microstructure and price discovery within RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes multi-leg spread construction, high-fidelity execution via a Principal's operational framework, ensuring atomic settlement for latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/transparent-geometric-structures-visualizing-multi-leg-spread-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The process of a committee agreeing on Request for Proposal (RFP) [criteria weights](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a foundational exercise in system design. It is the architectural phase of a decision-making apparatus, where the primary objective is to construct a rational, transparent, and defensible framework for evaluating external partners. The core challenge resides in translating subjective, often conflicting, stakeholder priorities into a unified, quantitative model. Without a structured methodology, this process is vulnerable to cognitive biases, personality-driven influence, and political maneuvering, resulting in a flawed evaluation system that compromises the integrity of the procurement outcome.

The goal is to engineer a mechanism that systematically channels individual expertise and perspectives into a collective, coherent, and strategically aligned set of priorities. This mechanism serves as the logic board for the entire evaluation, ensuring that the final decision is a direct and traceable consequence of the organization’s stated objectives, rather than an artifact of a poorly defined consensus process.

At its heart, the task requires the committee to build a shared model of value. Each criterion in an RFP ▴ from technical specifications and cost to vendor viability and support ▴ represents a dimension of this value model. The weights assigned to these criteria are the scaling factors that define their relative importance within the system. An unstructured approach, such as an open-ended discussion leading to a simple vote, often fails because it does not force a granular trade-off analysis.

Committee members might agree that “security” and “cost” are both important, but such a surface-level agreement masks deep-seated differences in how they would prioritize one over the other when a decision requires a direct compromise. A robust method, therefore, must provide a structured protocol for making these trade-offs explicit and quantifiable. It transforms the abstract art of negotiation into the rigorous science of [multi-criteria decision analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), creating an auditable and logically sound foundation for the significant financial and operational commitment that follows the selection of a vendor.

![A gleaming, translucent sphere with intricate internal mechanisms, flanked by precision metallic probes, symbolizes a sophisticated Principal's RFQ engine. This represents the atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies, enabling high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives markets, minimizing latency and slippage for optimal alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/inst-digital-asset-deriv-rfq-os-for-optimal-high-fidelity-trade-exec.jpg)

![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategy for criteria weighting is about selecting the appropriate decision-making technology for the committee. The chosen framework must be powerful enough to handle the complexity of the decision, yet clear enough to be understood and trusted by all participants. The spectrum of available strategies ranges from simple, intuitive methods to highly structured, mathematically grounded processes. The selection of a strategy is a critical choice that dictates the objectivity, defensibility, and ultimate effectiveness of the RFP evaluation.

An inadequate strategy can introduce systemic flaws that ripple through the entire procurement lifecycle, leading to suboptimal vendor selection and internal dissent. The optimal strategy provides a clear, logical pathway for converting diverse expert opinions into a single, unified weighting scheme that accurately reflects the organization’s strategic intent.

> The strategic imperative is to adopt a framework that forces a rational comparison of priorities, thereby neutralizing cognitive biases and political influence.

![A beige Prime RFQ chassis features a glowing teal transparent panel, symbolizing an Intelligence Layer for high-fidelity execution. A clear tube, representing a private quotation channel, holds a precise instrument for algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Weighting Methodologies

A committee’s first strategic decision is to choose the system it will use to determine weights. Different methodologies offer varying degrees of structure, complexity, and resistance to bias. The choice of methodology is a trade-off between ease of use and analytical rigor. While simpler methods can be implemented quickly, they often lack the mechanisms to ensure consistency and true consensus.

More sophisticated methods require a greater investment in time and facilitation but produce results that are significantly more robust and defensible. The following table provides a comparative analysis of common approaches, framing the selection as a design choice for the committee’s decision engine.

| Methodology | Operational Mechanism | Primary Advantage | Systemic Weakness | Optimal Use Case |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Point Allocation | Each committee member is given a set number of points (e.g. 100) to distribute among the criteria as they see fit. The final weights are the average of all members’ allocations. | Simplicity and speed. The process is intuitive and requires minimal training or facilitation. | Highly susceptible to cognitive biases like anchoring and gaming. Lacks a mechanism for direct trade-off analysis between criteria. | Low-stakes, non-complex RFPs where speed is the primary concern and a high degree of analytical rigor is unnecessary. |
| Rank Ordering | Members individually rank the criteria from most to least important. The ranks are then aggregated (e.g. using a Borda count) to produce a final weighted order. | Forces a relative prioritization among all criteria. It is more structured than simple point allocation. | Does not quantify the magnitude of preference. The difference between rank 1 and 2 may be vast, while the difference between rank 3 and 4 may be negligible. | Quickly identifying the most and least important criteria in the early stages of discussion, before a more granular weighting is required. |
| Delphi Method | An iterative, anonymous process. A facilitator collects individual weights, aggregates them, and circulates a summary. Members then revise their weights based on the group summary. This continues for several rounds. | Anonymity reduces the impact of dominant personalities. The iterative process encourages convergence toward a consensus. | Can be time-consuming and facilitator-dependent. Convergence may be artificial, with individuals conforming to the group mean without genuine agreement. | Geographically dispersed committees or situations where hierarchical dynamics could stifle open debate in a face-to-face setting. |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | A highly structured method where committee members perform a series of pairwise comparisons, judging how much more important one criterion is than another using a standardized scale. A mathematical process derives the weights and checks for logical consistency. | Exceptional rigor and objectivity. It breaks down a complex decision into manageable parts and includes a built-in mechanism (Consistency Ratio) to ensure rational judgments. | Requires a trained facilitator and a significant time commitment. The underlying mathematics can appear complex to participants if not explained well. | High-stakes, complex RFPs, particularly in regulated industries or public procurement, where a transparent, mathematically defensible, and auditable decision process is paramount. |

![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## The Analytic Hierarchy Process as the Premier Framework

For high-stakes procurement decisions, the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP) represents the gold standard. It is a systems-based approach that transforms the ambiguous task of “agreeing on weights” into a structured, analytical procedure. AHP was developed by Thomas L. Saaty and is designed specifically for complex, multi-criteria decision problems.

Its power lies in its use of pairwise comparisons. Instead of asking a [committee member](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-ai-change-the-required-skillset-for-a-best-execution-committee-member/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to assign an absolute weight to a criterion, AHP asks a simpler, more direct question ▴ “Comparing Criterion A and Criterion B, which is more important, and by how much?” This process is repeated for all pairs of criteria.

This method forces a disciplined thought process. By focusing on only two criteria at a time, it reduces the cognitive load on decision-makers and allows for more nuanced judgments. The results of these comparisons are then synthesized mathematically to produce a set of weights, or a [priority vector](https://prime.greeks.live/area/priority-vector/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), that reflects the collective judgment of the committee. Crucially, the process includes a logical consistency check.

The [Consistency Ratio](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CR) measures the degree of logical contradiction in a person’s judgments. For example, if a member states that Cost is more important than [Technical Solution](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-performance-indicators-for-evaluating-a-middleware-solution-for-a-high-frequency-trading-desk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and Technical Solution is more important than Vendor Support, but then states that Vendor Support is more important than Cost, the system flags this as a logical inconsistency that needs to be revisited. This feature ensures the final weights are the product of rational and coherent deliberation, making the AHP a superior strategic framework for any committee tasked with making a significant and defensible decision.

![A sleek, institutional-grade Prime RFQ component features intersecting transparent blades with a glowing core. This visualizes a precise RFQ execution engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and dynamic price discovery for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-microstructure.jpg)

![A sleek cream-colored device with a dark blue optical sensor embodies Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. It signifies High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, driven by an Intelligence Layer optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-engine-optimized-rfq-protocols-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a method to determine [RFP criteria weights](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria-weights/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the most critical phase. It is where the theoretical strategy is translated into a practical, repeatable process. For a committee, this requires a clear operational playbook that guides participants through each step, ensuring that every voice is heard within a structured and rational framework. The [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process (AHP) provides such a playbook.

Its implementation is a facilitated, multi-step procedure designed to build consensus not through informal debate, but through a systematic and quantifiable analysis of priorities. This section details the operational steps for a committee to execute the AHP, transforming a collection of individual opinions into a single, logically consistent, and defensible set of criteria weights. The process requires discipline and a commitment to the system, but the result is a decision foundation of unparalleled integrity.

![A central teal sphere, representing the Principal's Prime RFQ, anchors radiating grey and teal blades, signifying diverse liquidity pools and high-fidelity execution paths for digital asset derivatives. Transparent overlays suggest pre-trade analytics and volatility surface dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-and-market-microstructure.jpg)

## An Operational Playbook for AHP Implementation

Successfully executing the AHP requires a structured session led by a neutral facilitator. The facilitator’s role is to guide the committee through the process, explain the mechanics, and ensure the rules of the system are followed. They do not contribute to the judgments but are responsible for the integrity of the process itself.

- 
**Define and Finalize the Criteria Hierarchy** ▴ Before any weighting can occur, the committee must agree on the final set of evaluation criteria. This is a critical first step. The criteria should be mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. For example, a top-level criterion like “Technical Merit” might be broken down into sub-criteria such as “Compliance with Specifications,” “Scalability,” and “Ease of Integration.” The committee must finalize this hierarchy before proceeding.

- 
**Introduce the [Pairwise Comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Scale** ▴ The facilitator explains the fundamental rating scale used for the pairwise comparisons. The most common is Saaty’s 1-9 scale, which translates qualitative judgments into quantitative figures. Each committee member must understand what each point on the scale signifies.

- 
**Conduct Individual Pairwise Comparisons** ▴ Working individually, each committee member compares every criterion against every other criterion. For a set of four criteria, this involves six comparisons (n(n-1)/2). For each pair, the member asks ▴ “Which of these two is more important, and by how much?” They record their judgment using the 1-9 scale. This step is performed individually to prevent the “groupthink” phenomenon and to capture each expert’s independent judgment.

- 
**Aggregate Judgments and Calculate Group Priorities** ▴ The individual judgments are collected. To synthesize them into a single group judgment for each pairwise comparison, the geometric mean is used. The geometric mean is preferred over the arithmetic mean because it properly handles the ratio scale properties of the AHP. Once the group’s pairwise [comparison matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-requirements-traceability-matrix-and-an-rfp-compliance-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is established, a mathematical procedure (typically using eigenvector analysis, though simplified normalization methods exist) is used to calculate the priority vector ▴ the normalized weights for each criterion.

- 
**Analyze and Enforce Consistency** ▴ The system’s most powerful feature is then applied. The facilitator calculates the Consistency Ratio (CR) for the aggregated group judgments. This ratio indicates whether the group’s comparisons are logically coherent. A CR of 0.10 or less is generally considered acceptable.
If the CR is too high, it signifies a logical contradiction in the group’s judgments. The facilitator then highlights the most inconsistent judgments and leads a discussion to resolve them. The committee revisits the specific comparisons causing the inconsistency until the CR falls within an acceptable range.

- 
**Finalize and Document the Weights** ▴ Once a consistent set of judgments is achieved, the resulting priority vector represents the final, agreed-upon weights for the [RFP criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). These weights are documented along with the process used to derive them, creating a transparent and auditable record of the committee’s decision-making process.

![Robust institutional Prime RFQ core connects to a precise RFQ protocol engine. Multi-leg spread execution blades propel a digital asset derivative target, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-proto-insti-digital-asset-derivs-hi-fi-exec-capital-effi-risk-mgmt.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling the AHP Process

To understand the execution of AHP, a quantitative example is essential. Let us assume a committee has agreed on four key criteria for an RFP ▴ **Technical Solution**, **Cost**, **[Vendor Experience](https://prime.greeks.live/news/crypto-funds-experience-significant-outflow-halting-prolonged-inflow-streak/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)**, and **[Data Security](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)**. The following tables illustrate the process of deriving the weights.

![A dark blue sphere and teal-hued circular elements on a segmented surface, bisected by a diagonal line. This visualizes institutional block trade aggregation, algorithmic price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Principal's Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk for digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/market-microstructure-driven-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## The Fundamental Scale of Pairwise Comparison

This table defines the language of the AHP. Each committee member uses these definitions to translate their qualitative judgment into a number for each pair of criteria.

| Numerical Rating | Verbal Judgment of Importance | Explanation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Equal importance | The two criteria contribute equally to the objective. |
| 3 | Moderate importance | Experience and judgment slightly favor one criterion over another. |
| 5 | Strong importance | Experience and judgment strongly favor one criterion over another. |
| 7 | Very strong importance | A criterion is favored very strongly over another; its dominance is demonstrated in practice. |
| 9 | Extreme importance | The evidence favoring one criterion over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation. |
| 2, 4, 6, 8 | Intermediate values | Used when compromise is needed between two judgments. |

![Two distinct components, beige and green, are securely joined by a polished blue metallic element. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimal liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-link.jpg)

## Illustrative Group Pairwise Comparison Matrix

After individual comparisons are made and aggregated using the geometric mean, the group’s consolidated judgments are placed in a matrix. The question is always ▴ “How much more important is the criterion in the row compared to the criterion in the column?” A value of 1 is placed on the diagonal. The reciprocal value is used in the lower-left half of the matrix (e.g. if A is 3 times more important than B, then B is 1/3 as important as A).

> This matrix represents the quantified consensus of the committee, forming the raw data from which the final weights are systematically derived.

The table below shows a hypothetical, aggregated set of judgments for our four criteria. For instance, the value ‘3’ in the first row, second column indicates the committee collectively judged the Technical Solution to be moderately more important than Cost. The value ‘1/5’ in the fourth row, second column indicates Data Security was judged to be strongly less important than Cost.

| Criteria | Technical Solution | Cost | Vendor Experience | Data Security |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Cost | 1/3 | 1 | 1/2 | 5 |
| Vendor Experience | 1/2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Data Security | 1/4 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1 |

![A dark, transparent capsule, representing a principal's secure channel, is intersected by a sharp teal prism and an opaque beige plane. This illustrates institutional digital asset derivatives interacting with dynamic market microstructure and aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Deriving the Final Criteria Weights

From the matrix above, the [final weights](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-sensitivity-analysis-in-validating-the-final-rfp-criteria-weights/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are calculated. A common and simplified method is to normalize the columns. First, sum each column. Then, divide each entry in the matrix by its column sum.

Finally, average the values across each row to get the priority vector, or the final weights. This process, along with the consistency check, is typically handled by AHP software, but the underlying logic is straightforward.

- **Step 1** ▴ Sum the columns of the comparison matrix.

- **Step 2** ▴ Create a normalized matrix by dividing each cell by its respective column sum.

- **Step 3** ▴ Calculate the average of each row in the normalized matrix. This average is the final weight for that criterion.

Following this procedure with the data from the comparison matrix results in the final, agreed-upon weights. For the example provided, the derived weights would be approximately:

- **Technical Solution** ▴ 45.1%

- **Cost** ▴ 22.8%

- **Vendor Experience** ▴ 24.5%

- **Data Security** ▴ 7.6%

The process also yields a Consistency Ratio (CR) of 0.09, which is below the 0.10 threshold, indicating the committee’s judgments were logical and coherent. The committee now has a set of weights that are not just arbitrary numbers, but the product of a structured, rational, and defensible analytical process. This quantitative foundation ensures the subsequent evaluation of vendor proposals is anchored in the declared, consensus-driven priorities of the organization.

![A futuristic metallic optical system, featuring a sharp, blade-like component, symbolizes an institutional-grade platform. It enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure via precise RFQ protocols, ensuring efficient price discovery and robust portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Hummel, J. Marjan, John F. P. Bridges, and Maarten J. IJzerman. “Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment ▴ A Tutorial.” _The Patient ▴ Patient-Centered Outcomes Research_, vol. 7, no. 2, 2014, pp. 129-40.

- Janković, Aleksandar, and Milena Popović. “Methods for assigning weights to decision makers in group AHP decision-making.” _Decision Making ▴ Applications in Management and Engineering_, vol. 2, no. 1, 2019, pp. 147-65.

- Saaty, Thomas L. “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.” _Journal of Mathematical Psychology_, vol. 15, no. 3, 1977, pp. 234-81.

- Forman, Ernest H. and K. Peniwati. “Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 108, no. 1, 1998, pp. 165-69.

- Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. and Sushil Kumar. “Analytic hierarchy process ▴ An overview of applications.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 169, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1-29.

- Basak, Indrani, and Thomas L. Saaty. “Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process.” _Mathematical and Computer Modelling_, vol. 17, no. 4-5, 1993, pp. 101-109.

![A futuristic, dark grey institutional platform with a glowing spherical core, embodying an intelligence layer for advanced price discovery. This Prime RFQ enables high-fidelity execution through RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives and managing liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Reflection

Adopting a systematic framework for determining RFP criteria weights does more than produce a set of numbers; it fundamentally re-engineers the committee’s decision-making process. The value of a method like the Analytic [Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is not confined to the mathematical precision of its output. Its true, lasting impact lies in the structure it imposes on dialogue and the transparency it injects into what is often an opaque procedure.

The process forces a conversation that is both deep and disciplined, compelling stakeholders to move beyond broad statements of importance and engage in the granular, often difficult, work of making explicit trade-offs. It creates a shared language and a common logical framework, allowing experts from disparate fields ▴ finance, technology, operations ▴ to map their unique perspectives onto a unified model.

Ultimately, the implementation of such a system is an investment in institutional integrity. The final weights become a clear statement of corporate intent, an auditable artifact that can be used to justify the final procurement decision to internal stakeholders, auditors, and even the vendors themselves. It transforms the selection process from a subjective beauty contest into a defensible, evidence-based evaluation. The knowledge gained through this article should be viewed as a component within a larger operational intelligence system.

The ability to structure a decision is as critical as the ability to analyze data or negotiate a contract. A superior operational framework is built not on isolated skills, but on the integration of such high-fidelity processes into every facet of the organization’s function, creating a decisive and sustainable strategic advantage.

![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives execution platform showcases its core market microstructure. A speckled surface depicts real-time market data streams](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-layered, institutional-grade device, poised with a beige base, dark blue core, and an angled mint green intelligence layer. This signifies a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and capital efficiency within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-intelligence.jpg)

## Criteria Weights

RFP criteria weighting is the precise calibration of a strategic decision engine to convert organizational objectives into optimal procurement outcomes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract visualization of a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. Intersecting transparent layers depict dynamic market microstructure, high-fidelity execution pathways, and liquidity aggregation for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Meaning ▴ Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, or MCDA, represents a structured computational framework designed for evaluating and ranking complex alternatives against a multitude of conflicting objectives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-ai-change-the-required-skillset-for-a-best-execution-committee-member/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular, dark-toned system with light structural components and a bright turquoise indicator, representing a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS for institutional-grade RFQ protocols. It signifies private quotation channels for block trades, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery through aggregated inquiry, minimizing slippage and information leakage within dark liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-for-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

## Committee Member

AI transforms the Best Execution Committee from historical trade reviewers into governors of a live, intelligent execution system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/priority-vector/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A pristine white sphere, symbolizing an Intelligence Layer for Price Discovery and Volatility Surface analytics, sits on a grey Prime RFQ chassis. A dark FIX Protocol conduit facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and Smart Order Routing for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocols, ensuring Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os-intelligence.jpg)

## Priority Vector

Meaning ▴ A Priority Vector represents a computational construct designed to assign a relative precedence to tasks or data elements within a system, dictating their processing order based on predefined criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-performance-indicators-for-evaluating-a-middleware-solution-for-a-high-frequency-trading-desk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Translucent circular elements represent distinct institutional liquidity pools and digital asset derivatives. A central arm signifies the Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ-driven price discovery, enabling high-fidelity execution via algorithmic trading, optimizing capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution-framework.jpg)

## Technical Solution

Evaluating HFT middleware means quantifying the speed and integrity of the system that translates strategy into market action. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract composition features a central, multi-layered blue structure representing a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform, flanked by two distinct liquidity pools. Intersecting blades symbolize high-fidelity execution pathways and algorithmic trading strategies, facilitating private quotation and block trade settlement within a market microstructure optimized for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Consistency Ratio

Meaning ▴ The Consistency Ratio is a quantitative metric employed to assess the logical coherence and reliability of subjective judgments within a pairwise comparison matrix, predominantly utilized in the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria-weights/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## Rfp Criteria Weights

Meaning ▴ RFP Criteria Weights quantify the calibrated importance of evaluation factors within a Request for Proposal. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp, translucent, green-tipped stylus extends from a metallic system, symbolizing high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. It represents a private quotation mechanism within an institutional grade Prime RFQ, enabling optimal price discovery for block trades via RFQ protocols, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-interface.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Curved, segmented surfaces in blue, beige, and teal, with a transparent cylindrical element against a dark background. This abstractly depicts volatility surfaces and market microstructure, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and revealing latent liquidity for institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-dynamics-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison

Meaning ▴ Pairwise Comparison is a systematic method for evaluating entities by comparing them two at a time, across a defined set of criteria, to establish a relative preference or value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-requirements-traceability-matrix-and-an-rfp-compliance-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered modular components, with transparent elements and metallic conduits, depict a robust RFQ Protocol engine. This architecture facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling efficient liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Comparison Matrix

An RTM ensures a product is built right; an RFP Compliance Matrix proves a proposal is bid right. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. An elongated panel displays dynamic numeric readouts, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and real-time market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-options.jpg)

## Rfp Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Criteria represent the meticulously defined quantitative and qualitative specifications issued by an institutional principal to evaluate potential counterparties or technology solutions for digital asset derivatives trading, establishing the foundational parameters for competitive assessment and strategic alignment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/news/crypto-funds-experience-significant-outflow-halting-prolonged-inflow-streak/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central glowing core within metallic structures symbolizes an Institutional Grade RFQ engine. This Intelligence Layer enables optimal Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, streamlining Block Trade and Multi-Leg Spread Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-core.jpg)

## Vendor Experience

This systemic shift in digital asset flows, driven by macroeconomic policy, necessitates a re-evaluation of capital allocation strategies for optimal portfolio resilience. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract, interlocking, translucent components with a central disc, representing a precision-engineered RFQ protocol framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. This symbolizes aggregated liquidity and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, enabling price discovery and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-dynamics.jpg)

## Data Security

Meaning ▴ Data Security defines the comprehensive set of measures and protocols implemented to protect digital asset information and transactional data from unauthorized access, corruption, or compromise throughout its lifecycle within an institutional trading environment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-sensitivity-analysis-in-validating-the-final-rfp-criteria-weights/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract bisected spheres, reflective grey and textured teal, forming an infinity, symbolize institutional digital asset derivatives. Grey represents high-fidelity execution and market microstructure teal, deep liquidity pools and volatility surface data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Final Weights

Sensitivity analysis validates RFP criteria weights by stress-testing the decision's stability against changes in priority, ensuring a robust and defensible vendor selection. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central rod, symbolizing an RFQ inquiry, links distinct liquidity pools and market makers. A transparent disc, an execution venue, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization.jpg)

## Hierarchy Process

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a>

**Tags:** [Decision Architecture](https://options.greeks.live/area/decision-architecture/), [Consistency Ratio](https://options.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/), [Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [RFP Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/), [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Structure for an Rfp Scoring Matrix to Ensure Both Clarity and Granularity in the Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-structure-for-an-rfp-scoring-matrix-to-ensure-both-clarity-and-granularity-in-the-evaluation/)
![Precision-engineered beige and teal conduits intersect against a dark void, symbolizing a Prime RFQ protocol interface. Transparent structural elements suggest multi-leg spread connectivity and high-fidelity execution pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual emphasizes atomic settlement, capital efficiency, and market microstructure dynamics for price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/insti-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-junction.jpg)

An optimal RFP scoring matrix is a weighted, multi-criteria decision model that quantifies vendor alignment with strategic goals.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Designing an RFP Scoring Template for Technology Procurement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-designing-an-rfp-scoring-template-for-technology-procurement/)
![A metallic cylindrical component, suggesting robust Prime RFQ infrastructure, interacts with a luminous teal-blue disc representing a dynamic liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives. A precise golden bar diagonally traverses, symbolizing an RFQ-driven block trade path, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure for institutional grade operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg)

An RFP scoring template's integrity dictates procurement success by translating strategic goals into a quantifiable vendor evaluation system.

- 
### [What Is the Role of a Neutral Facilitator in Ensuring an Unbiased and Productive Rfp Weighting Workshop?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-neutral-facilitator-in-ensuring-an-unbiased-and-productive-rfp-weighting-workshop/)
![A precise lens-like module, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight, rests on a sharp blade, representing optimal smart order routing. Curved surfaces depict distinct liquidity pools within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, enabling efficient RFQ for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

A neutral facilitator engineers a procedural framework to insulate RFP weighting from bias, ensuring the outcome is a product of objective analysis.

- 
### [How Should the Weighting of RFP Criteria Change Based on Different Corporate Strategies like Innovation versus Cost Leadership?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-rfp-criteria-change-based-on-different-corporate-strategies-like-innovation-versus-cost-leadership/)
![Angular, transparent forms in teal, clear, and beige dynamically intersect, embodying a multi-leg spread within an RFQ protocol. This depicts aggregated inquiry for institutional liquidity, enabling precise price discovery and atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-aggregation-dynamics.jpg)

RFP weighting must dynamically mirror corporate strategy, prioritizing cost for efficiency and innovation for long-term value creation.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Evaluation Criteria in a Complex It Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-evaluation-criteria-in-a-complex-it-rfp/)
![The central teal core signifies a Principal's Prime RFQ, routing RFQ protocols across modular arms. Metallic levers denote precise control over multi-leg spread execution and block trades. This framework ensures high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient management of latent liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-prime-os-rfq-system-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A system for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for high-stakes technology acquisition.

- 
### [How Can Cross-Functional Teams Mitigate the Risks Inherent in the RFP Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-cross-functional-teams-mitigate-the-risks-inherent-in-the-rfp-process/)
![A complex, multi-faceted crystalline object rests on a dark, reflective base against a black background. This abstract visual represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. It symbolizes multi-leg spreads, implied volatility surfaces, and the precise price discovery within RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-architecture.jpg)

A cross-functional team mitigates RFP risk by transforming procurement from a siloed transaction into a holistic, system-wide analysis.

- 
### [How Does a Multi-Stage Rfp Improve Vendor Performance and Accountability Post-Contract?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-multi-stage-rfp-improve-vendor-performance-and-accountability-post-contract/)
![Abstract intersecting geometric forms, deep blue and light beige, represent advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms signify multi-leg execution strategies, principal liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic pricing against a textured global market sphere, reflecting robust market microstructure and intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-execution-algorithmic-pricing-global-liquidity-principal-trading-systemic-integration-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A multi-stage RFP builds a systemic, evidence-based framework for vendor accountability and post-contract performance management.

- 
### [In What Scenarios Would Withholding Rfp Scoring Weights Provide a Strategic Advantage to the Buyer?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-scenarios-would-withholding-rfp-scoring-weights-provide-a-strategic-advantage-to-the-buyer/)
![Two robust, intersecting structural beams, beige and teal, form an 'X' against a dark, gradient backdrop with a partial white sphere. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ and block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency through Prime RFQ FIX Protocol integration for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution.jpg)

Withholding RFP scoring weights gives the buyer a strategic edge by compelling vendors to reveal their true understanding of value.

- 
### [How Can You Quantify Subjective Stakeholder Preferences in an RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-subjective-stakeholder-preferences-in-an-rfp/)
![A polished metallic modular hub with four radiating arms represents an advanced RFQ execution engine. This system aggregates multi-venue liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across diverse counterparty risk profiles, powered by a sophisticated intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-rfq-hub-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

Quantifying subjective RFP preferences involves architecting a system to translate qualitative stakeholder judgments into a quantitative, defensible decision model.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Best Method for a Committee to Agree on RFP Criteria Weights?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-method-for-a-committee-to-agree-on-rfp-criteria-weights/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-method-for-a-committee-to-agree-on-rfp-criteria-weights/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Best Method for a Committee to Agree on RFP Criteria Weights? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The optimal method for a committee to agree on RFP criteria weights is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a system that ensures rational, transparent, and defensible consensus. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-method-for-a-committee-to-agree-on-rfp-criteria-weights/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T12:29:45+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T12:29:48+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract representation depicts a sophisticated RFQ engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent, intricate structure symbolizes market microstructure and algorithmic trading strategies enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery. Integrated via FIX Protocol, this system minimizes latency and mitigates counterparty risk, facilitating block trade and multi-leg spread management. This Prime RFQ component ensures best execution and alpha generation through quantitative analysis for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Consensus Building",
        "Consistency Ratio",
        "Data Security",
        "Decision Architecture",
        "Group Decision Making",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Priority Vector",
        "Procurement Process",
        "RFP Criteria",
        "RFP Criteria Weighting",
        "RFP Criteria Weights",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Vendor Evaluation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-method-for-a-committee-to-agree-on-rfp-criteria-weights/
