# What Is the Best Way to Structure an Rfp Evaluation Committee for a Complex It Procurement? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![A meticulously engineered mechanism showcases a blue and grey striped block, representing a structured digital asset derivative, precisely engaged by a metallic tool. This setup illustrates high-fidelity execution within a controlled RFQ environment, optimizing block trade settlement and managing counterparty risk through robust market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

![A large, smooth sphere, a textured metallic sphere, and a smaller, swirling sphere rest on an angular, dark, reflective surface. This visualizes a principal liquidity pool, complex structured product, and dynamic volatility surface, representing high-fidelity execution within an institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimized-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Concept

The assembly of a Request for Proposal (RFP) [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for a complex Information Technology procurement represents a critical juncture in an organization’s capital allocation process. This group functions as a specialized instrument designed to perform a single, high-stakes task ▴ to convert a spectrum of vendor proposals, rich with promises and technical specifications, into a clear, defensible, and [strategically aligned procurement decision](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-performance-measurement-and-compensation-be-aligned-with-the-firms-liquidity-risk-appetite/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The structural integrity of this committee directly determines the quality of the outcome. A well-formed committee operates as a sophisticated information processing system, mitigating the inherent risks of significant IT investments, which often suffer from information asymmetry and the potential for costly misalignments between technological capabilities and business objectives.

At its core, the committee is an exercise in applied organizational intelligence. Its primary purpose extends beyond merely selecting a vendor. It is charged with safeguarding the organization’s strategic interests by ensuring that the chosen solution provides the best possible value and aligns with long-term goals. The very composition of the committee ▴ the selection of its members, the definition of their roles, and the protocols governing their interactions ▴ is a deliberate act of system design.

Each member serves as a specialized sensor, attuned to a different dimension of the procurement problem ▴ technical feasibility, financial stability, operational impact, and legal integrity. The challenge lies in synthesizing these disparate inputs into a coherent and unified assessment.

> The fundamental purpose of an RFP evaluation committee is to translate vendor proposals into a risk-adjusted, strategically aligned procurement decision.

The efficacy of this human-centric system hinges on its structure. A typical committee comprises three to five members, a size that balances diverse expertise with manageable coordination. This structure is not arbitrary; it is a calculated effort to foster a diversity of thought while preventing the paralysis that can afflict larger groups. The inclusion of [subject matter experts](https://prime.greeks.live/area/subject-matter-experts/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from various domains ▴ such as finance, operations, and technology ▴ is essential for a holistic evaluation.

The process avoids situations where a single perspective, such as a purely technical one, might dominate the decision-making process at the expense of other critical business considerations. The formalization of this structure, often involving confidentiality agreements and conflict of interest declarations, underscores the gravity of the committee’s function. It is a mechanism designed to ensure that the evaluation is conducted with objectivity and a singular focus on the organization’s best interests.

![Textured institutional-grade platform presents RFQ inquiry disk amidst liquidity fragmentation. Singular price discovery point floats](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-best-execution.jpg)

![Precision instruments, resembling calibration tools, intersect over a central geared mechanism. This metaphor illustrates the intricate market microstructure and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-analytics.jpg)

## Strategy

![A sleek pen hovers over a luminous circular structure with teal internal components, symbolizing precise RFQ initiation. This represents high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure and achieving atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ liquidity pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-through-prime-os-precision.jpg)

## The Systemic Design of the Evaluation Body

Designing an effective [RFP evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is an exercise in building a high-performance team dedicated to a singular, complex analytical task. The strategic objective is to create a structure that balances deep expertise with impartial governance, ensuring the final recommendation is both technically sound and strategically astute. The composition must be deliberate, with each member chosen not just for their individual knowledge, but for the specific lens they bring to the collective analysis. This moves the committee from a simple panel of judges to a dynamic analytical entity.

The selection process for committee members is the foundational step. Prospective members should be vetted for their experience, availability, and, most importantly, their ability to contribute to a collaborative and unbiased [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The ideal committee is a blend of specific, complementary roles, each with a defined mandate. This specialization ensures that all facets of the proposals are scrutinized with the requisite depth.

- **The Chairperson** ▴ This individual is the facilitator and process owner. The Chair does not necessarily need to be the deepest [subject matter](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-subject-matter-experts-in-the-design-and-execution-of-an-rfp-scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) expert but must possess a profound understanding of the business objectives driving the procurement. Their role is to guide discussions, enforce the evaluation framework, and ensure the committee adheres to its timeline and charter. They are the conductors of the orchestra, ensuring every instrument plays its part in harmony.

- **The [Procurement Lead](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-lead/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Often serving as a non-voting facilitator or the Chairperson, this individual is the guardian of the process. They ensure that the evaluation adheres to all organizational policies and legal requirements. Their expertise is in the mechanics of procurement itself ▴ managing vendor communications, ensuring fairness and transparency, and documenting the decision-making process for auditability.

- **The Technical Lead(s)** ▴ These are the subject matter experts (SMEs) who can dissect the technical merits of each proposal. For a complex [IT procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/it-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), this may involve specialists in infrastructure, software architecture, cybersecurity, and data management. Their mandate is to validate vendor claims, assess the feasibility of the proposed solution, and determine its compatibility with the existing technology stack.

- **The Financial Analyst** ▴ This member scrutinizes the financial health of the vendors and the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO) of each proposed solution. Their analysis goes beyond the initial price tag to include implementation costs, licensing models, maintenance fees, and potential long-term financial risks.

- **The End-User Representative(s)** ▴ These individuals represent the voice of the people who will ultimately use the technology. They provide an essential check on usability, workflow integration, and the practical impact of the solution on day-to-day operations. Their perspective prevents the selection of a technically elegant solution that is operationally impractical.

- **The Legal/Compliance Advisor** ▴ For high-stakes procurement, a legal expert is vital. This role reviews proposed contracts, service-level agreements (SLAs), data privacy terms, and intellectual property clauses to protect the organization from legal and regulatory exposure.

![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

## Protocols for Information Flow and Decision Governance

Once the committee is formed, the next strategic layer involves establishing the rules of engagement. A formal charter should be drafted, outlining the committee’s purpose, the evaluation criteria, the scoring methodology, and the schedule. This document serves as the constitution for the evaluation process, ensuring consistency and fairness.

> A well-defined evaluation framework, including weighted scoring, is the mechanism that converts subjective opinions into objective, comparable data points.

The development of evaluation criteria is a critical task that must be completed before the RFP is issued. This prevents the criteria from being influenced, consciously or unconsciously, by the proposals received. These criteria should be directly linked to the project’s core requirements and categorized into “must-haves” and “nice-to-haves.” This allows for a tiered evaluation process, where proposals that fail to meet mandatory requirements can be efficiently screened out.

A [weighted scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the primary tool for translating these criteria into a quantitative comparison. This model assigns a specific weight to each evaluation criterion based on its relative importance to the project’s success. This process forces stakeholders to have a frank discussion about priorities and makes the entire evaluation more objective and transparent.

### Comparative Committee Structures

| Structure Type | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Centralized Standing Committee | A permanent committee that evaluates all major IT procurements for the organization. | Develops deep expertise and process efficiency over time. Ensures consistency in evaluation across projects. | May lack specific subject matter expertise for highly specialized procurements. Can become a bottleneck if overloaded. |
| Ad-Hoc Project Committee | A committee formed specifically for a single procurement project and disbanded upon completion. | Allows for the selection of ideal subject matter experts for the specific technology being procured. Highly focused on the project’s unique needs. | Lacks the experience and process maturity of a standing committee. Requires significant ramp-up time for each new procurement. |
| Hybrid Model | A core group of permanent members (e.g. Procurement, Finance) supplemented by ad-hoc technical and business experts for each project. | Combines the process consistency of a standing committee with the specialized expertise of an ad-hoc model. Balances efficiency with precision. | Requires careful coordination between permanent and temporary members. Potential for friction if roles are not clearly defined. |

The governance model also dictates how the committee interacts. A preparatory meeting before proposals are reviewed is crucial to ensure every member understands their role, the criteria, and the scoring system. The process should also define protocols for vendor interactions, such as demonstrations or clarification questions, to ensure all vendors are treated fairly and equally. Finally, the strategy must account for the final output ▴ a formal recommendation report that documents the entire process, the scores, and a clear justification for the selection, creating an auditable trail that supports the final decision.

![Abstract representation of a central RFQ hub facilitating high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. Two aggregated inquiries or block trades traverse the liquidity aggregation engine, signifying price discovery and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub-core.jpg)

![A sharp, teal blade precisely dissects a cylindrical conduit. This visualizes surgical high-fidelity execution of block trades for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

![A sleek conduit, embodying an RFQ protocol and smart order routing, connects two distinct, semi-spherical liquidity pools. Its transparent core signifies an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-bridging-diverse-liquidity-pools-via-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

## Operational Playbook for the Evaluation Lifecycle

The execution phase of the [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) committee’s work is a structured, multi-stage process that moves from broad analysis to a specific, defensible recommendation. This operational playbook ensures a rigorous, impartial, and well-documented evaluation. The process can be broken down into four distinct phases, each with specific inputs, activities, and outputs.

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Phase 1 ▴ Mobilization and Calibration

This initial phase is about setting the foundation for a successful evaluation. The objective is to ensure the committee is properly formed, aligned, and equipped before any proposals are opened.

- **Formal Committee Appointment** ▴ The project sponsor or executive leadership formally appoints the committee members based on the strategic roles defined earlier. Each member receives an official charter outlining their responsibilities, the project scope, and the expected time commitment.

- **The Kick-Off Meeting** ▴ The Chairperson convenes the first official meeting. The primary agenda item is a thorough review of the RFP, particularly the scope of work and the predefined evaluation criteria. The Procurement Lead educates the committee on the rules of engagement, including confidentiality, conflict of interest protocols, and communication guidelines.

- **Scoring System Calibration** ▴ The committee collectively discusses the [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model. This is a critical step to ensure that every evaluator interprets the criteria and the scoring scale (e.g. 1-5) in the same way. The group might conduct a mock evaluation of a hypothetical proposal to align their scoring tendencies and establish a shared understanding of what constitutes a “5” versus a “3” on any given criterion. This calibration minimizes subjective variance between evaluators.

- **Documentation Handover** ▴ The Procurement Lead provides each member with a secure package containing the RFP, the evaluation worksheets, and the schedule.

![A sophisticated metallic instrument, a precision gauge, indicates a calibrated reading, essential for RFQ protocol execution. Its intricate scales symbolize price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## Phase 2 ▴ Independent and Consolidated Evaluation

This phase is the core of the analytical work, where individual expertise is applied and then synthesized into a collective view.

- **Initial Individual Review** ▴ Each evaluator independently reads and scores every qualified proposal against the established criteria. They must document their rationale for each score on their individual evaluation worksheet, providing specific evidence from the proposal to support their assessment. This independent work is crucial to avoid “groupthink.” It is considered best practice for the price proposals to be kept separate and not revealed to the technical evaluators at this stage to prevent cost from influencing the technical scoring.

- **Consolidation Meeting** ▴ The Chairperson facilitates a series of meetings where the committee discusses the proposals one by one. Each evaluator presents their scores for a specific criterion, and the group discusses any significant variances. This is where the true value of the diverse committee emerges, as the technical lead might challenge a claim that the end-user representative finds appealing, or the financial analyst might raise concerns about a vendor that otherwise looks strong.

- **Reference Checks** ▴ The committee designates one or two members to conduct thorough reference checks for the top-scoring vendors. This provides qualitative data to validate or challenge the claims made in the proposals. Past performance and customer satisfaction are powerful indicators.

- **Creation of a Shortlist** ▴ Based on the consolidated scores and reference checks, the committee identifies a shortlist of the top two or three vendors. These are the candidates who will proceed to the next, more intensive stage of evaluation.

![A precise geometric prism reflects on a dark, structured surface, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This visualizes block trade execution and price discovery for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-precision-execution.jpg)

## Phase 3 ▴ Intensive Due Diligence and Final Selection

This phase involves direct interaction with the shortlisted vendors to resolve ambiguities and assess their capabilities in a live environment. It is here that the committee must grapple with the intangible aspects of a partnership. The depth of a vendor’s preparation for a demonstration, their team’s coherence, and their ability to answer complex questions under pressure provide invaluable data that cannot be gleaned from a written document. This is often the most revealing part of the process, where the theoretical solution meets the practical reality of the team that will implement it.

A vendor might present a flawless proposal on paper, yet their team’s lack of cohesion or inability to deviate from a script during a demonstration can be a significant red flag, indicating potential challenges in a real-world, dynamic project environment. The committee must be attuned to these human factors, as they are often predictive of the true quality of the partnership to come.

- **Vendor Demonstrations/Presentations** ▴ The shortlisted vendors are invited to present their solutions and answer questions from the committee. These sessions should be highly structured, with a clear agenda and time limits to ensure fairness. The committee should prepare a set of standardized questions to ask each vendor.

- **Best and Final Offers (BAFO)** ▴ If necessary, the committee may request BAFOs from the shortlisted vendors. This is typically done to clarify specific points or to seek more competitive pricing after the technical evaluation is complete.

- **Final Scoring and Deliberation** ▴ The committee reconvenes to incorporate the new information from the demonstrations and BAFOs into their evaluation. They finalize their scoring, calculate the total weighted scores, and formally rank the vendors.

![A precise, multi-faceted geometric structure represents institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. Its sharp angles denote high-fidelity execution and price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, symbolizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Phase 4 ▴ Recommendation and Dissolution

The final phase is about documenting the decision and formally concluding the committee’s work.

- **Drafting the Recommendation Report** ▴ The Chairperson and Procurement Lead draft a comprehensive report that details the entire evaluation process, from the criteria and weights to the final scores and ranking. The report must clearly articulate the rationale for the final recommendation, providing a robust justification for the selection.

- **Final Committee Approval** ▴ The full committee reviews and approves the final recommendation report.

- **Presentation to Leadership** ▴ The Chairperson presents the committee’s recommendation to the project sponsor or executive leadership for final approval and contract negotiation.

- **Archiving and Debrief** ▴ All evaluation materials are securely archived by the Procurement Lead to provide an audit trail. The committee should hold a final “lessons learned” meeting to identify potential improvements for future procurement processes.

![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The cornerstone of objective evaluation is the weighted scoring matrix. This tool transforms qualitative assessments into a defensible quantitative ranking. Below is a detailed example of such a model for a complex enterprise resource planning (ERP) system procurement.

### Weighted Scoring Matrix for ERP System Procurement

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Vendor A Score (1-5) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (1-5) | Vendor B Weighted Score | Vendor C Score (1-5) | Vendor C Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (40%) | | | | | | | |
| – Core Functionality Alignment | 15% | 4 | 0.60 | 5 | 0.75 | 4 | 0.60 |
| – System Architecture & Scalability | 10% | 3 | 0.30 | 4 | 0.40 | 5 | 0.50 |
| – Integration Capabilities (APIs) | 10% | 5 | 0.50 | 4 | 0.40 | 3 | 0.30 |
| – Cybersecurity Posture | 5% | 4 | 0.20 | 3 | 0.15 | 5 | 0.25 |
| Vendor Capabilities (25%) | | | | | | | |
| – Implementation Methodology & Team | 10% | 4 | 0.40 | 5 | 0.50 | 3 | 0.30 |
| – Customer Support & SLA | 10% | 3 | 0.30 | 4 | 0.40 | 4 | 0.40 |
| – Vendor Viability & Roadmap | 5% | 5 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.20 | 4 | 0.20 |
| Cost (35%) | | | | | | | |
| – Total Cost of Ownership (5-Year) | 25% | 3 | 0.75 | 2 | 0.50 | 5 | 1.25 |
| – Pricing & Licensing Flexibility | 10% | 4 | 0.40 | 3 | 0.30 | 5 | 0.50 |
| Total | 100% | | 3.70 | | 3.60 | | 4.30 |

**Formula** ▴ The [Weighted Score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for each line item is calculated as (Weight Score). The Total Weighted Score for each vendor is the sum of the individual weighted scores. In this model, although Vendor A and B have strong technical and capability scores, Vendor C’s superior cost-effectiveness, which is the most heavily weighted category group, results in the highest overall score, making it the recommended choice based on this quantitative analysis.

![A sleek, multi-faceted plane represents a Principal's operational framework and Execution Management System. A central glossy black sphere signifies a block trade digital asset derivative, executed with atomic settlement via an RFQ protocol's private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-principal-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## References

- Bevis, Michael. _Public Procurement ▴ A Manager’s Guide to Practice_. National Institute of Governmental Purchasing, 2018.

- National Institute of Governmental Purchasing. _The Legal Aspects of Public Procurement_. NIGP Press, 2020.

- Project Management Institute. _A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)_. 7th ed. Project Management Institute, 2021.

- Tarantino, Anthony. _Essentials of IT-SCM ▴ A Concise Guide to Theory and Practice_. Supply Chain Management Press, 2019.

- Gordon, Saul. _The Art and Science of Vendor Management ▴ A Complete Guide to Strategic Sourcing and Procurement_. Wiley, 2022.

- Watjatrakul, Boonlert. “Vendor selection strategy for IT outsourcing ▴ The weighted-criteria evaluation technique.” _Journal of Enterprise Information Management_, vol. 29, no. 6, 2016, pp. 903-923.

- Zionts, Stanley. “MCDM ▴ If not a Roman numeral, then what?” _Interfaces_, vol. 9, no. 4, 1979, pp. 94-101.

- Commonwealth of Virginia Information Technologies Agency. _IT Procurement Manual_. VITA SCM, 2023.

![The abstract composition features a central, multi-layered blue structure representing a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform, flanked by two distinct liquidity pools. Intersecting blades symbolize high-fidelity execution pathways and algorithmic trading strategies, facilitating private quotation and block trade settlement within a market microstructure optimized for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Reflection

![A symmetrical, intricate digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its metallic and translucent elements visualize a robust RFQ protocol facilitating multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

## The Committee as a Microcosm of Organizational Strategy

Ultimately, the structure of an RFP evaluation committee does more than just facilitate a procurement decision; it holds up a mirror to the organization itself. The rigor of its process, the clarity of its criteria, and the collaborative spirit of its members are direct reflections of the organization’s commitment to strategic discipline, fiscal responsibility, and operational excellence. A committee plagued by internal politics, vague objectives, or a lack of executive support is symptomatic of broader organizational issues that no technology acquisition can fix.

The framework detailed here is a system for decision integrity. It is a mechanism designed to channel diverse expertise toward a unified, evidence-based conclusion. Contemplating this structure invites a deeper inquiry ▴ Does our organization possess the cultural and operational maturity to execute such a process effectively? Is there a willingness to subordinate individual preferences to a collective, data-driven judgment?

The successful implementation of a complex IT system begins not with the technology itself, but with the quality of the human system designed to select it. The true potential, therefore, lies in using the formation of this committee as a catalyst for reinforcing a culture of strategic clarity and analytical rigor across the enterprise.

![A sleek, balanced system with a luminous blue sphere, symbolizing an intelligence layer and aggregated liquidity pool. Intersecting structures represent multi-leg spread execution and optimized RFQ protocol pathways, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-institutional-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-performance-measurement-and-compensation-be-aligned-with-the-firms-liquidity-risk-appetite/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp, crystalline spearhead symbolizes high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. Resting on a reflective surface, it evokes optimal liquidity aggregation within a sophisticated RFQ protocol environment, reflecting complex market microstructure and advanced algorithmic trading strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution.jpg)

## Strategically Aligned Procurement Decision

Aligning compensation to liquidity risk requires embedding the full, true cost of liquidity into every performance metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/subject-matter-experts/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central teal sphere, secured by four metallic arms on a circular base, symbolizes an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a controlled liquidity pool within market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades and managing counterparty risk through a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub-1.jpg)

## Subject Matter Experts

Meaning ▴ Subject Matter Experts are individuals possessing specialized, verifiable knowledge within a defined domain, critical for the design, implementation, and optimization of complex financial systems, particularly within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered RFQ protocol engine, its central teal sphere signifies high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This module embodies a Principal's dedicated liquidity pool, facilitating robust price discovery and atomic settlement within optimized market microstructure, ensuring best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An RFP Evaluation Committee functions as a dedicated, cross-functional internal module responsible for the systematic assessment of vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multifaceted, luminous abstract structure against a dark void, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Its sharp, reflective surfaces embody high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol efficiency, and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-latent-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

Meaning ▴ The Evaluation Process constitutes a systematic, data-driven methodology for assessing performance, risk exposure, and operational compliance within a financial system, particularly concerning institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-subject-matter-experts-in-the-design-and-execution-of-an-rfp-scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting abstract geometric planes depict institutional grade RFQ protocols and market microstructure. Speckled surfaces reflect complex order book dynamics and implied volatility, while smooth planes represent high-fidelity execution channels and private quotation systems for digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-digital-asset-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Subject Matter

The Subject Matter Expert is the analytical core of an RFP, translating business needs into a defensible scoring architecture. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-lead/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms depict a sophisticated Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Sharp lines and a control sphere symbolize high-fidelity execution, algorithmic precision, and private quotation within an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-architecture-for-optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Procurement Lead

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Lead, within an institutional digital asset derivatives framework, defines a critical systemic function or a dedicated module responsible for orchestrating the optimal acquisition of all external resources vital for trading operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/it-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## It Procurement

Meaning ▴ IT Procurement defines the systematic process for acquiring technology assets, services, and solutions required to establish and maintain an institution's operational infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A digitally rendered, split toroidal structure reveals intricate internal circuitry and swirling data flows, representing the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ. This visualizes dynamic RFQ protocols, algorithmic execution, and real-time market microstructure analysis for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-core-processing-architecture-visualized-through-interconnected-liquidity-networks.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A crystalline geometric structure, symbolizing precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution, rests upon an intricate market microstructure framework. This visual metaphor illustrates the Prime RFQ facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, including Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, through RFQ protocols for block trades with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Model constitutes a systematic computational framework designed to evaluate and prioritize diverse entities by assigning distinct numerical weights to a set of predefined criteria, thereby generating a composite score that reflects their aggregated importance or suitability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Parallel execution layers, light green, interface with a dark teal curved component. This depicts a secure RFQ protocol interface for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and block trade execution within a Prime RFQ framework, reflecting dynamic market microstructure for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring defines a computational methodology where multiple input variables are assigned distinct coefficients or weights, reflecting their relative importance, before being aggregated into a single, composite metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished glass sphere reflecting diagonal beige, black, and cyan bands, rests on a metallic base against a dark background. This embodies RFQ-driven Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and mitigating Counterparty Risk via Prime RFQ Private Quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-best-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a>

**Tags:** [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/), [Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/), [Evaluation Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/), [Procurement Lead](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-lead/), [Service Level Agreements](https://options.greeks.live/area/service-level-agreements/), [IT Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/it-procurement/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Difference between a Simple Scoring and a Weighted Scoring Model in Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-scoring-and-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-rfp-evaluation/)
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

A simple scoring model tallies vendor merits equally; a weighted model calibrates scores to reflect strategic priorities.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Mitigate Evaluator Bias during the Rfp Scoring Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-mitigate-evaluator-bias-during-the-rfp-scoring-process/)
![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency. The Prime RFQ underpins algorithmic trading, minimizing latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

Mitigating evaluator bias in RFP scoring requires a systemic framework of blind evaluations, weighted rubrics, and independent scoring.

- 
### [How Do You Quantify Subjective Criteria in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-quantify-subjective-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A precise mechanical interaction between structured components and a central dark blue element. This abstract representation signifies high-fidelity execution of institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and minimizing slippage within robust market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

Quantifying subjective RFP criteria involves translating qualitative judgments into a weighted scoring system for objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [How Do You Create an Effective Weighted Scoring Model for an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-effective-weighted-scoring-model-for-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols. Outer elements reflect liquidity pool dynamics and high-fidelity execution in complex market microstructure, managing counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

A weighted scoring model translates strategic priorities into a quantitative framework for objective, defensible RFP evaluation.

- 
### [How Can Weighted Scoring in an Rfp Mitigate Procurement Risks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-mitigate-procurement-risks/)
![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

Weighted scoring in an RFP mitigates procurement risks by providing a structured, data-driven framework for vendor evaluation that prioritizes strategic objectives over pure cost.

- 
### [What Are the Best Methods for Establishing Objective Rfp Scoring Rubrics?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-methods-for-establishing-objective-rfp-scoring-rubrics/)
![Highly polished metallic components signify an institutional-grade RFQ engine, the heart of a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its precise engineering enables high-fidelity execution, supporting multi-leg spreads, optimizing liquidity aggregation, and minimizing slippage within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-underpinning-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

An objective RFP rubric is a decision engineering system that translates strategic requirements into a quantifiable, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Key Components of a Defensible and Transparent Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-components-of-a-defensible-and-transparent-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A futuristic apparatus visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. A transparent sphere represents a private quotation or block trade, balanced on a teal Principal's operational framework, signifying capital efficiency within an RFQ protocol. The sharp upper blade implies price discovery and best execution across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

A defensible RFP scoring model translates strategic priorities into a transparent, auditable system for objective vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Defining the Scoring Scale in an RFP Evaluation Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-defining-the-scoring-scale-in-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix/)
![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

A robust RFP scoring scale translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for objective vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Evaluation Criteria between an Rfp and an Rfq?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-evaluation-criteria-between-an-rfp-and-an-rfq/)
![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades. The crossing elements symbolize multi-leg spread execution and aggregated liquidity, managed by a robust Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

An RFQ's evaluation is a quantitative check of price and compliance, while an RFP's is a qualitative assessment of a solution's strategic value.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Best Way to Structure an Rfp Evaluation Committee for a Complex It Procurement?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-for-a-complex-it-procurement/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-for-a-complex-it-procurement/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Best Way to Structure an Rfp Evaluation Committee for a Complex It Procurement? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A structured RFP evaluation committee translates vendor proposals into a risk-mitigated, strategically aligned technology investment. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-for-a-complex-it-procurement/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T01:03:28+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T01:03:32+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg",
        "caption": "Abstract, diagonally aligned components feature light green/beige parallel bands interacting with a dark teal, rounded element against a black background. This visual metaphor represents the intricate market microstructure of an institutional-grade platform for digital asset derivatives. It highlights a sophisticated RFQ protocol enabling private quotation and block trade execution for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures. The design signifies a Prime RFQ delivering high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency mitigating counterparty risk."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best and Final Offer",
        "Committee Roles",
        "Decision Matrix",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Process",
        "IT Procurement",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Procurement Lead",
        "Procurement Process",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Committee",
        "Risk Mitigation",
        "Scoring Model",
        "Service Level Agreements",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Subject Matter Experts",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-for-a-complex-it-procurement/
