# What Is the Difference between a Project Manager and a Neutral Facilitator during the Rfp Evaluation Phase? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![Polished metallic rods, spherical joints, and reflective blue components within beige casings, depict a Crypto Derivatives OS. This engine drives institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution, robust price discovery, and capital efficiency within complex market microstructure via algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-engine-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-execution.jpg)

![Geometric panels, light and dark, interlocked by a luminous diagonal, depict an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Central nodes symbolize liquidity aggregation and price discovery within a Principal's execution management system, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-1.jpg)

## Concept

The Request for Proposal (RFP) evaluation phase represents a critical junction in an organization’s procurement system. It is the point where potential external capabilities are assessed against internal requirements, culminating in a high-consequence decision. Within this operational theater, two distinct roles, the [Project Manager](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-facilitator-and-a-project-manager-in-the-rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and the [Neutral Facilitator](https://prime.greeks.live/area/neutral-facilitator/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), are often deployed.

Understanding their differentiation is fundamental to appreciating the robustness of a well-structured evaluation system. Their functions are not merely variations of administrative oversight; they represent the codification of two separate, yet complementary, control mechanisms designed to ensure process integrity and optimal outcomes.

A Project Manager operates as the procedural engine of the evaluation. This role is defined by a mandate to drive the process forward according to a pre-defined blueprint. The Project Manager’s domain encompasses the logistical and temporal dimensions of the evaluation ▴ scheduling, resource coordination, document management, and communication flow. They are the system’s primary point of contact, responsible for ensuring that the mechanics of the [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) operate efficiently and predictably.

Their performance is measured against tangible metrics such as adherence to timelines, completeness of documentation, and the smooth execution of planned activities. The Project Manager ensures the “what” and “when” of the evaluation are meticulously managed.

![A macro view of a precision-engineered metallic component, representing the robust core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ. Its intricate Market Microstructure design facilitates Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ Protocols, enabling High-Fidelity Execution and Algorithmic Trading for Block Trades, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-core-system-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-and-advanced-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## The Systemic Function of the Project Manager

The Project Manager’s role is fundamentally about process control and execution. They are tasked with translating the strategic objectives of the RFP into a concrete project plan with clear milestones and deliverables. This involves a significant amount of upfront planning, including defining the scope of the evaluation, identifying the necessary stakeholders to form the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and establishing a realistic timeline. During the evaluation, they act as the central hub for all communications, fielding questions from vendors and ensuring that all interactions are documented and distributed fairly to all participants.

This function is vital for maintaining a level playing field and creating a comprehensive record of the procurement process. The Project Manager’s perspective is inherently internal, focused on the organization’s resources and objectives.

![A sleek, multi-layered platform with a reflective blue dome represents an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. The glowing interstice symbolizes atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

## The Systemic Function of the Neutral Facilitator

In contrast, the Neutral Facilitator is introduced into the system to govern the quality and integrity of the decision-making process itself. This role is defined by its impartiality and its focus on the human dynamics of evaluation. The Facilitator’s mandate is to construct and maintain an environment where objective, criteria-based assessment can thrive. They are the guardians of [procedural fairness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), tasked with mitigating the cognitive and social biases that can unconsciously distort judgment in a group setting.

Their contribution is measured by the confidence and defensibility of the final decision. The Neutral Facilitator ensures the “how” and “why” of the evaluation are sound, unbiased, and transparent.

This role is particularly critical in complex procurements where [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) may be qualitative and open to interpretation. The Facilitator designs the evaluation methodology, including the scoring rubrics and consensus-building protocols. They do not have a vote or a stake in the outcome; their sole purpose is to ensure the integrity of the process by which the outcome is reached.

This requires a sophisticated understanding of group dynamics, decision science, and conflict resolution. By managing the evaluation meetings, they ensure that all evaluators have an equal voice, that discussions remain focused on the established criteria, and that the final consensus is a true reflection of the group’s collective, unbiased judgment.

![A precise, metallic central mechanism with radiating blades on a dark background represents an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It signifies high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-hub.jpg)

![A dark blue sphere, representing a deep institutional liquidity pool, integrates a central RFQ engine. This system processes aggregated inquiries for Digital Asset Derivatives, including Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimized-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Strategy

Deploying a Project Manager and a Neutral Facilitator within an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a strategic decision to install a dual-system governance model. This model separates the management of process logistics from the management of decision quality. This separation provides a powerful check and balance, enhancing the overall resilience and integrity of the procurement function. The strategic value of each role becomes apparent when examining their distinct operational domains and the specific risks they are designed to mitigate.

> A well-structured RFP evaluation strategically separates process mechanics from decision-making integrity, assigning distinct control functions to the Project Manager and the Neutral Facilitator.

![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

## The Project Manager’s Strategic Framework

The Project Manager’s strategic value lies in operational excellence and risk mitigation from a procedural standpoint. Their framework is built on the principles of [project management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/project-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ▴ planning, execution, monitoring, and control. They create the operational architecture for the evaluation, ensuring that every step is anticipated, resourced, and scheduled. This proactive management prevents the logistical failures that can derail an evaluation, such as missed deadlines, incomplete documentation, or poor communication, which could open the organization to legal challenges.

A core component of the Project Manager’s strategy is the development of a comprehensive RFP Evaluation Plan. This document serves as the operational playbook for the entire committee. It details:

- **[Evaluation Team](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Composition** ▴ Identifying and securing the commitment of individuals from relevant departments (e.g. technical, financial, legal, end-user) to ensure a holistic assessment.

- **Roles and Responsibilities** ▴ Clearly defining the duties of each evaluator, the chairperson, and any subject matter experts, as managed by the Project Manager.

- **Timeline and Milestones** ▴ Establishing a detailed schedule for every phase, from proposal receipt and individual review to consensus meetings and final vendor selection.

- **Communication Protocol** ▴ Outlining the formal channels for all communications with vendors and internal stakeholders to ensure consistency and fairness.

- **Documentation Management** ▴ Specifying the system for receiving, distributing, and archiving all proposal documents, scoring sheets, and meeting minutes to create a defensible audit trail.

The table below illustrates a simplified timeline and responsibility matrix that a Project Manager would develop and manage.

### RFP Evaluation Project Plan

| Phase | Key Activities | Primary Responsibility | Timeline (Business Days) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Initiation | Finalize Evaluation Plan; Confirm Committee Membership; Distribute RFP to Vendors | Project Manager | T+5 |
| 2. Proposal Receipt | Receive and log all vendor proposals; Perform initial compliance check for mandatory requirements | Project Manager | T+30 |
| 3. Individual Evaluation | Distribute proposals to evaluators; Evaluators conduct individual scoring based on criteria | Evaluation Committee | T+31 to T+45 |
| 4. Consensus & Scoring | Facilitator leads consensus meeting; Committee discusses scoring discrepancies and reaches consensus | Neutral Facilitator | T+46 to T+50 |
| 5. Down-Selection | Identify shortlist of vendors for presentations or further due diligence | Project Manager & Committee | T+51 |
| 6. Final Selection | Conduct final reviews; Make final vendor recommendation; Document decision rationale | Evaluation Committee | T+52 to T+60 |
| 7. Award & Debrief | Notify successful and unsuccessful vendors; Project Manager coordinates contract negotiation | Project Manager | T+61 onwards |

![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

## The Neutral Facilitator’s Strategic Framework

The Neutral Facilitator’s strategic value is centered on safeguarding the defensibility and quality of the final decision. Their framework is drawn from the fields of decision science, organizational psychology, and conflict resolution. They are deployed to counteract the inherent human element of evaluation ▴ specifically, the pervasive influence of [cognitive biases](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-biases/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

Biases are systematic errors in thinking that can lead an evaluation team to make irrational or unfair judgments, exposing the organization to protest and poor outcomes. The Facilitator’s primary strategic function is to design and enforce a process that minimizes the impact of these biases.

Cognitive biases are particularly dangerous in a group setting where social pressures can amplify individual errors in judgment. The Neutral Facilitator is trained to identify and counteract these dynamics. Their presence shifts the focus of the evaluation team from defending individual opinions to collectively seeking the most objective assessment based on the agreed-upon criteria.

The following table outlines common cognitive biases in RFP evaluations and the corresponding mitigation strategies a Neutral Facilitator would employ.

### Cognitive Bias Mitigation Framework

| Cognitive Bias | Description | Facilitator’s Mitigation Strategy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Confirmation Bias | The tendency to favor information that confirms pre-existing beliefs or initial impressions. | Structure the evaluation so that all criteria are scored for all proposals before any discussion. Enforce a “reasons against” protocol, requiring evaluators to articulate weaknesses even for preferred vendors. |
| Halo/Horns Effect | Allowing a single positive (Halo) or negative (Horns) attribute of a vendor to influence the entire evaluation. | Break down the evaluation into discrete, independently scored criteria. Prevent evaluators from making global assessments until all individual criteria have been discussed and scored. |
| Groupthink | The desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. | Encourage dissenting opinions by assigning a “devil’s advocate” role. Use silent brainstorming or individual scoring rounds before open discussion to anchor opinions in independent thought. |
| Anchoring Bias | Relying too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the “anchor”) when making decisions. | Control the flow of information. For example, ensure that qualitative and technical aspects are fully evaluated before price is revealed to prevent the price from anchoring the perception of quality. |
| Availability Heuristic | Overestimating the importance of information that is easily recalled, such as a recent positive or negative experience with a vendor. | Continuously redirect the discussion back to the specific evidence presented within the four corners of the proposals and the pre-defined evaluation criteria. |

![A stylized RFQ protocol engine, featuring a central price discovery mechanism and a high-fidelity execution blade. Translucent blue conduits symbolize atomic settlement pathways for institutional block trades within a Crypto Derivatives OS, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![A multi-faceted digital asset derivative, precisely calibrated on a sophisticated circular mechanism. This represents a Prime Brokerage's robust RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage within complex market microstructure, critical for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-2.jpg)

## Execution

In the execution phase, the theoretical distinction between the Project Manager and the Neutral Facilitator becomes a tangible operational reality. Their activities, while concurrent, are distinct in focus and method. The Project Manager executes a plan, while the Facilitator executes a methodology. The interplay between these two execution streams creates a robust, dual-control system that ensures both efficiency and integrity throughout the high-stakes evaluation process.

![Abstract system interface on a global data sphere, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing circuits represent market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, facilitating price discovery and capital efficiency across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## The Project Manager’s Execution Mandate

The Project Manager’s execution is characterized by proactive coordination and meticulous documentation. They are the operational backbone of the evaluation, managing the tangible assets of the process ▴ time, information, and people. Their work is continuous and highly visible, providing the structure within which the evaluation committee can perform its duties.

A typical execution workflow for the Project Manager includes the following procedural steps:

- **Secure Proposal Submission** ▴ The Project Manager establishes and manages the secure portal or physical location for proposal receipt. They are responsible for time-stamping each submission and formally closing the submission window. Any late submissions are handled strictly according to the rules defined in the RFP.

- **Conduct Compliance Screening** ▴ Immediately following the deadline, the Project Manager performs a preliminary, non-judgmental review of each proposal. This check verifies that all mandatory forms are present and signed, and that the proposal adheres to specified formatting requirements. This is a pass/fail gate; non-compliant proposals may be disqualified at this stage, per the RFP’s terms.

- **Distribute Evaluation Packages** ▴ The Project Manager compiles and distributes the complete evaluation package to each committee member. This package contains the compliant proposals, scoring sheets, a copy of the evaluation plan, and the timeline. Distribution is controlled and tracked to maintain confidentiality.

- **Manage Vendor Communications** ▴ All vendor questions during the evaluation period are funneled through the Project Manager. They log every question and, in coordination with the committee chair, formulate and distribute answers to all participating vendors simultaneously to ensure fairness.

- **Schedule and Coordinate Meetings** ▴ The Project Manager is responsible for all meeting logistics, including scheduling the individual review periods, the main [consensus meeting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-meeting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and any subsequent vendor presentations or clarification sessions. They work in close coordination with the Neutral Facilitator to ensure the consensus meeting is scheduled with adequate time for thorough discussion.

- **Track Progress and Report Status** ▴ Throughout the process, the Project Manager monitors the progress of individual evaluators against the timeline. They provide regular status updates to senior stakeholders, highlighting any risks to the schedule or process.

> The Project Manager’s role in execution is to create a frictionless operational environment, allowing the evaluation team to focus solely on the substantive assessment of proposals.

![Intricate metallic mechanisms portray a proprietary matching engine or execution management system. Its robust structure enables algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-market-microstructure.jpg)

## The Neutral Facilitator’s Execution Mandate

The Neutral Facilitator’s execution comes to the forefront during the live evaluation sessions, particularly the consensus meeting. Their mandate is to actively manage the interpersonal and cognitive dynamics of the group to produce a fair and well-documented decision. Their work is intensive and requires a high degree of situational awareness and interpersonal skill.

The execution of the Facilitator’s role is most evident in the consensus meeting protocol:

- **Opening the Session** ▴ The Facilitator begins the meeting by restating the objective ▴ to reach a collective, evidence-based assessment of the proposals against the established criteria. They review the ground rules for discussion, emphasizing confidentiality, respectful debate, and the commitment to the process.

- **Calibrating the Scoring** ▴ Before discussing any specific vendor, the Facilitator may lead a calibration exercise. They will select one or two evaluation criteria and have the team discuss their interpretation to ensure everyone is applying the same standard. This helps to surface and resolve any ambiguities in the scoring rubric early on.

- **Managing the Discussion** ▴ The Facilitator guides the conversation methodically, often one criterion at a time across all proposals, rather than one proposal at a time. This approach mitigates the halo/horns effect by forcing a parallel comparison on specific attributes. They ensure every evaluator has an opportunity to speak, drawing out quieter members and managing dominant personalities.

- **Focusing on Evidence** ▴ When evaluators offer opinions, the Facilitator consistently asks, “Where in the proposal does it support that assessment?” This simple question relentlessly pulls the conversation back to the documented evidence, away from speculation or personal bias.

- **Resolving Discrepancies** ▴ The Facilitator’s primary tool is the analysis of scoring variance. After individual scores are collected, they are compiled onto a master consensus sheet. The Facilitator highlights areas of significant disagreement for discussion. It is a moment of grappling with the data. Why did one evaluator score a technical solution as a ‘5’ while another scored it a ‘2’? The exploration of this variance is where true evaluation occurs. It is not about forcing the ‘2’ to become a ‘5’, but about understanding the reasoning behind each score and determining if it is rooted in a valid interpretation of the evidence and criteria. The process reveals misunderstandings, uncovers overlooked details, and ultimately leads to a more robust and unified group understanding. The final consensus score is not an average; it is a new number, agreed upon by the group after reasoned debate.

- **Documenting the Rationale** ▴ The Facilitator’s final, critical task is to ensure that the “why” behind every consensus score is captured. They work with the committee to articulate a clear, concise justification for the final rating on each criterion for each proposal. This documentation is the cornerstone of a defensible decision, providing a clear audit trail that links the final selection back to the RFP’s stated requirements. This is a non-negotiable step.

![A metallic circular interface, segmented by a prominent 'X' with a luminous central core, visually represents an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts precise market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## References

- Kahneman, Daniel. _Thinking, Fast and Slow_. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

- Project Management Institute. _A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)_. 7th ed. Project Management Institute, 2021.

- Schotter, Andrew, and Yaw Nyarko. “A Behavioral Study of Bargaining and Fairness in a Public Procurement Auction.” _Experimental Economics_, vol. 22, no. 3, 2019, pp. 634-663.

- Flyvbjerg, Bent. “From Nobel Prize to Project Management ▴ Getting Risks Right.” _Project Management Journal_, vol. 37, no. 3, 2006, pp. 5-15.

- Bazerman, Max H. and Don A. Moore. _Judgment in Managerial Decision Making_. 8th ed. Wiley, 2012.

- Dimitri, Nicola. “Procurement and Bidding.” _Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I_, edited by Luis C. Corchón and Marco A. Marini, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 416-441.

- Essig, Michael, and Anni-Kaisa Kähkönen. “Relationship management in the procurement process.” _Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management_, vol. 15, no. 4, 2009, pp. 257-265.

- Thibaut, John, and Laurens Walker. _Procedural Justice ▴ A Psychological Analysis_. L. Erlbaum Associates, 1975.

- Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under Uncertainty ▴ Heuristics and Biases.” _Science_, vol. 185, no. 4157, 1974, pp. 1124-1131.

- Dekel, Ofer, and Amos Schurr. “Cognitive Biases in Government Procurement ▴ An Experimental Study.” _Review of Law & Economics_, vol. 13, no. 1, 2017, pp. 169-194.

![Symmetrical precision modules around a central hub represent a Principal-led RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and block trade aggregation within a robust market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and capital efficiency via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-led-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek, metallic multi-lens device with glowing blue apertures symbolizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine. Its precision optics enable real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution, facilitating automated price discovery and aggregated inquiry within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Calibrating the Decision Architecture

The examination of these two roles moves beyond a simple comparison of duties. It prompts a deeper consideration of an organization’s decision-making architecture. The presence of a Project Manager codifies a commitment to procedural efficiency.

The addition of a Neutral Facilitator signals a more profound commitment to decisional integrity. The deliberate separation of these functions creates a system resilient to both logistical failure and cognitive distortion.

Ultimately, the structure of an evaluation process reflects an organization’s operational philosophy. A system that relies solely on a project management function may execute flawlessly on time and on budget, yet arrive at a suboptimal or indefensible conclusion. Conversely, a process that over-indexes on facilitation without strong project management may foster great decisions that are never reached due to procedural chaos.

The optimal state is a calibrated system where both functions operate in concert, creating a secure, efficient, and objective environment for making critical procurement choices. The true question is not which role is more important, but whether the existing operational framework is consciously designed to leverage the distinct strengths of both.

![A sleek, multi-component system, predominantly dark blue, features a cylindrical sensor with a central lens. This precision-engineered module embodies an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure observation, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/neutral-facilitator/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A segmented rod traverses a multi-layered spherical structure, depicting a streamlined Institutional RFQ Protocol. This visual metaphor illustrates optimal Digital Asset Derivatives price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and robust liquidity pool integration, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow-1.jpg)

## Neutral Facilitator

Meaning ▴ A Neutral Facilitator is a systemic component designed to enable transaction execution without introducing directional bias or favoring specific market participants. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-facilitator-and-a-project-manager-in-the-rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two diagonal cylindrical elements. The smooth upper mint-green pipe signifies optimized RFQ protocols and private quotation streams](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-optimization-1.jpg)

## Project Manager

The Project Manager architects the RFP's temporal and resource structure; the Facilitator engineers the unbiased, high-fidelity flow of information within it. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two abstract, segmented forms intersect, representing dynamic RFQ protocol interactions and price discovery mechanisms. The layered structures symbolize liquidity aggregation across multi-leg spreads within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

Meaning ▴ The Evaluation Process constitutes a systematic, data-driven methodology for assessing performance, risk exposure, and operational compliance within a financial system, particularly concerning institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Robust metallic structures, one blue-tinted, one teal, intersect, covered in granular water droplets. This depicts a principal's institutional RFQ framework facilitating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating deep liquidity pools for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives for enhanced capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A teal-blue disk, symbolizing a liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives, is intersected by a bar. This represents an RFQ protocol or block trade, detailing high-fidelity execution pathways](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## Procedural Fairness

Meaning ▴ Procedural Fairness, within a digital asset derivatives ecosystem, denotes the consistent and impartial application of predefined rules and processes to all market participants, ensuring that no entity receives preferential treatment or suffers arbitrary disadvantage. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central rod, symbolizing an RFQ inquiry, links distinct liquidity pools and market makers. A transparent disc, an execution venue, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/project-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## Project Management

Meaning ▴ Project Management is the systematic application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to project activities to meet the project requirements, specifically within the context of designing, developing, and deploying robust institutional digital asset infrastructure and trading protocols. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract, layered spheres symbolize complex market microstructure and liquidity pools. A central reflective conduit represents RFQ protocols enabling block trade execution and precise price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, ensuring high-fidelity execution within institutional trading of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Evaluation Team

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Team constitutes a dedicated internal or external unit systematically tasked with the rigorous assessment of technological systems, operational protocols, or trading strategies within the institutional digital asset derivatives domain. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cognitive-biases/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic circular financial instrument with segmented teal and grey zones, centered by a precision indicator, symbolizes an advanced Crypto Derivatives OS. This system facilitates institutional-grade RFQ protocols for block trades, enabling granular price discovery and optimal multi-leg spread execution across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-platform.jpg)

## Cognitive Biases

Meaning ▴ Cognitive Biases represent systematic deviations from rational judgment, inherently influencing human decision-making processes within complex financial environments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-meeting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic cross-structure, embodying an RFQ engine's market microstructure, showcases diverse elements. One granular arm signifies aggregated liquidity pools and latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-microstructure-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Consensus Meeting

Meaning ▴ A Consensus Meeting represents a formalized procedural mechanism designed to achieve collective agreement among designated stakeholders regarding critical operational parameters, protocol adjustments, or strategic directional shifts within a distributed system or institutional framework. </a>

**Tags:** [Cognitive Bias Mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/area/cognitive-bias-mitigation/), [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/), [Project Manager Role](https://options.greeks.live/area/project-manager-role/), [Vendor Selection Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-process/), [Evaluation Team](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/), [Neutral Facilitator](https://options.greeks.live/area/neutral-facilitator/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [In What Ways Can a Thorough Rfp Evaluation Process Mitigate Long-Term Project Risks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-can-a-thorough-rfp-evaluation-process-mitigate-long-term-project-risks/)
![A precise, engineered apparatus with channels and a metallic tip engages foundational and derivative elements. This depicts market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of block trades via RFQ protocols, enabling algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-3.jpg)

A thorough RFP evaluation process mitigates long-term project risks by embedding strategic due diligence and objective analysis into the foundational act of vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Types of Cognitive Bias That Affect Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-cognitive-bias-that-affect-rfp-evaluation/)
![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

Cognitive biases in RFP evaluation are systemic vulnerabilities in the decision-making process that can be mitigated through a structured, data-driven operational framework.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluations/)
![An abstract composition featuring two overlapping digital asset liquidity pools, intersected by angular structures representing multi-leg RFQ protocols. This visualizes dynamic price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and aggregated liquidity within institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-aggregated-liquidity-and-multi-leg-execution-via-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

Cognitive biases in RFP evaluations are systemic mental shortcuts that can be mitigated by architecting a two-stage, data-driven process.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Documenting an Rfp Evaluation Process to Ensure a Defensible Audit Trail?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-documenting-an-rfp-evaluation-process-to-ensure-a-defensible-audit-trail/)
![A central mechanism of an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS with dynamically rotating arms. These translucent blue panels symbolize High-Fidelity Execution via an RFQ Protocol, facilitating Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation for Digital Asset Derivatives within complex Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

A defensible RFP audit trail is a complete, contemporaneous record system proving the evaluation was fair, consistent, and objective.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Types of Bias in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A sleek, light-colored, egg-shaped component precisely connects to a darker, ergonomic base, signifying high-fidelity integration. This modular design embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for atomic settlement and best execution within a robust Principal's operational framework, enhancing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-principal-system.jpg)

The most common types of bias in an RFP evaluation are cognitive shortcuts that systematically skew decision-making away from objective criteria.

- 
### [In What Scenarios Would a Non-Voting Facilitator Be Most Critical to a Successful Rfp Outcome?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-scenarios-would-a-non-voting-facilitator-be-most-critical-to-a-successful-rfp-outcome/)
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools. Modular elements represent atomic settlement and capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

A non-voting facilitator is a system governor, ensuring procedural integrity in complex RFPs to produce a defensible, high-quality outcome.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Document Its Rfp Evaluation for Audit Purposes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-document-its-rfp-evaluation-for-audit-purposes/)
![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

An auditable RFP evaluation record is a systematically constructed, unalterable framework of evidence that proves procedural fairness and strategic intent.

- 
### [What Are the Key Components of a Defensible RFP Evaluation Framework?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-components-of-a-defensible-rfp-evaluation-framework/)
![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement. This design optimizes market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

A defensible RFP evaluation framework is a structured, auditable system for objectively selecting the best-value vendor.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid in an Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A translucent blue algorithmic execution module intersects beige cylindrical conduits, exposing precision market microstructure components. This institutional-grade system for digital asset derivatives enables high-fidelity execution of block trades and private quotation via an advanced RFQ protocol, ensuring optimal capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-core-execution-architecture-intelligence-layer.jpg)

A flawed RFP evaluation stems from systemic failures in defining requirements, mitigating bias, and ensuring objective, data-driven consensus.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Difference between a Project Manager and a Neutral Facilitator during the Rfp Evaluation Phase?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-project-manager-and-a-neutral-facilitator-during-the-rfp-evaluation-phase/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-project-manager-and-a-neutral-facilitator-during-the-rfp-evaluation-phase/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Difference between a Project Manager and a Neutral Facilitator during the Rfp Evaluation Phase? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The Project Manager drives the RFP evaluation process, while the Neutral Facilitator safeguards the integrity of the decision itself. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-project-manager-and-a-neutral-facilitator-during-the-rfp-evaluation-phase/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T19:09:52+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T19:09:56+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-segments-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg",
        "caption": "An abstract arc of interconnected, alternating pale green and dark grey segments, each light segment featuring a black dot. This visual metaphor represents the sophisticated market microstructure and RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. Each segment signifies a distinct private quotation or aggregated inquiry phase, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement. The modularity highlights a Prime RFQ framework, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution across liquidity pools for multi-leg spread strategies and portfolio margin management."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Cognitive Bias Mitigation",
        "Cognitive Biases",
        "Confirmation Bias",
        "Consensus Meeting",
        "Decision Architecture",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Evaluation Process",
        "Evaluation Team",
        "Group Decision Making",
        "Groupthink",
        "Neutral Facilitator",
        "Procedural Fairness",
        "Procurement Management",
        "Procurement Risk",
        "Project Management",
        "Project Manager Role",
        "RFP Compliance",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Vendor Selection Process"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-project-manager-and-a-neutral-facilitator-during-the-rfp-evaluation-phase/
