# What Is the Difference between a Simple Mistake and a Manifest Error? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-03
**Categories:** Question

---

![A precision mechanism, symbolizing an algorithmic trading engine, centrally mounted on a market microstructure surface. Lens-like features represent liquidity pools and an intelligence layer for pre-trade analytics, enabling high-fidelity execution of institutional grade digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Concept

In the architecture of financial markets, the distinction between a [simple mistake](https://prime.greeks.live/area/simple-mistake/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and a [manifest error](https://prime.greeks.live/area/manifest-error/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a foundational principle of system integrity. It delineates the boundary between an erroneous user input and a flaw in the system’s recorded state. Understanding this division is essential for any principal or institution seeking to operate with precision, as the classification of an error dictates the entire protocol for its resolution, from operational remedy to legal recourse. The system treats these two events with profoundly different mechanisms, reflecting their distinct origins and implications for market fairness and contractual certainty.

A simple mistake is an operational failure of input. It is an error in action. Consider a trader intending to sell 100 contracts who instead, through a manual slip, enters an order to sell 1,000. This is the classic “fat-finger” error.

The market’s infrastructure, the exchange’s matching engine, and the clearinghouse’s settlement processes are all functioning exactly as designed. The system correctly processes the erroneous input it received. The fault lies with the user’s action, a momentary lapse in execution that introduces an unintended instruction into a sound operational framework. The correction of such mistakes is typically governed by [exchange rules](https://prime.greeks.live/area/exchange-rules/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for trade cancellations or amendments, which are designed to be swift, transparent, and bound by strict time limits to minimize market disruption.

> A simple mistake is an error of action within a correctly functioning system, while a manifest error is an intrinsic flaw within a document or record itself.

A manifest error, conversely, is a failure in the system’s recorded state. It is an error in documentation or certification that is so self-evidently wrong it requires no extensive investigation to be recognized. The legal definition often hinges on terms like “oversights and blunders so obvious as to admit no difference of opinion.” This type of error is not about a faulty action but about a faulty record.

For instance, a loan agreement that mistakenly lists the interest rate at 50% instead of the agreed-upon 5%, or a milestone certificate in a project finance deal that is issued based on demonstrably false data. The error is inherent to the document itself, creating an inconsistency or an outcome that is absurd on its face when viewed within the commercial context of the transaction.

![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## The Systemic Boundary and Locus of Failure

To draw an analogy from systems architecture, a simple mistake is akin to a user typing a syntactically correct but incorrect command into a computer’s command line. The computer executes the command faithfully because the instruction is valid within its operational parameters. The responsibility for the outcome rests with the user. A manifest error is like a bug in the software’s code that causes it to produce a nonsensical result, such as displaying a negative balance in a savings account.

The error is intrinsic to the system’s logic, and its output is invalid on its face. Correcting it requires patching the code, not just re-entering the command.

In financial markets, the “code” is the set of contracts, certificates, and term sheets that define the obligations between parties. When a manifest error is identified, the resolution protocol moves beyond the operational desks of an exchange and into the realm of legal interpretation and contractual remedy. The key is that the error must be “manifest” or “demonstrable,” meaning it is obvious to a reasonable professional operating within that specific market. Proving its existence may even involve presenting extrinsic evidence ▴ supporting documents or communications that reveal the true, intended commercial terms and highlight the glaring inconsistency in the final document.

![Abstract, sleek forms represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Interlocking elements denote RFQ protocol optimization and price discovery across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-5.jpg)

## What Is the Evidentiary Threshold for a Manifest Error?

The threshold for proving a manifest error is deliberately high to preserve the principle of contractual finality. Parties cannot simply undo agreements they regret by claiming a mistake. The error must be incontrovertible. For example, in capital markets transactions, a trust deed may grant a trustee the power to amend a document to correct a manifest error without requiring a full vote of the noteholders.

This is a powerful tool for efficiency, but the trustee must be independently satisfied that the error is indeed manifest, protecting the interests of all stakeholders. This process acknowledges that while contracts are meant to be definitive, they are created by humans and can contain flaws so significant that enforcing them as written would defy the clear and commonly understood purpose of the agreement.

![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

![A sleek, bi-component digital asset derivatives engine reveals its intricate core, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol. This Prime RFQ component enables high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure, managing latent liquidity for institutional operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

For an institution, managing the risk of errors requires a dual-pronged strategy that addresses both operational inputs and contractual frameworks. The approaches are fundamentally different because they target distinct points of failure within the transaction lifecycle. A robust strategy anticipates the inevitability of both [simple mistakes](https://prime.greeks.live/question/from-a-quantitative-perspective-how-is-rfq-price-quality-measured-beyond-simple-slippage/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and [manifest errors](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-differentiate-between-systemic-and-idiosyncratic-causes-of-partial-fill-errors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and builds systemic resilience to mitigate their impact. This involves a blend of technological safeguards, procedural discipline, and legal fortification.

![Abstract geometric forms, symbolizing bilateral quotation and multi-leg spread components, precisely interact with robust institutional-grade infrastructure. This represents a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating high-fidelity execution via an RFQ workflow, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-infrastructure.jpg)

## Mitigating Simple Mistakes a Strategy of Input Validation

The strategy for minimizing simple mistakes centers on controlling the point of order entry and execution. Since these are errors of action, the goal is to build a system of checks and balances that catches flawed inputs before they reach the market. This is a matter of [operational risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/operational-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), implemented through a layered defense.

- 
**[Pre-Trade Controls](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pre-trade-controls/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** These are automated, system-level checks that validate orders against a set of predefined rules. They can include limits on order size, price collars to prevent trades far from the current market, and checks for duplicate orders. These controls function as the first line of defense, acting as an automated backstop against the most common types of manual entry errors.

- 
**Procedural Discipline** This involves human-led processes designed to ensure accuracy. A common example is the “four-eyes” principle, where a second individual must review and approve a trade before it is executed, particularly for large or complex transactions. This enforces a moment of reflection and secondary validation.

- 
**Algorithmic Safeguards** For institutions using automated trading strategies, the algorithms themselves must have built-in safety mechanisms. These can include kill switches that halt trading if certain loss limits are breached or if the algorithm behaves in an unexpected manner, preventing a simple coding error from causing catastrophic losses.

![Interlocked, precision-engineered spheres reveal complex internal gears, illustrating the intricate market microstructure and algorithmic trading of an institutional grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Fortifying against Manifest Errors a Strategy of Contractual Integrity

Preventing manifest errors is a strategic activity focused on the integrity of legal and financial documents. The goal is to ensure that agreements accurately reflect the commercial intent of all parties and include mechanisms for correcting obvious flaws without resorting to costly litigation. This strategy is executed primarily through legal and compliance functions.

> A strategy for simple mistakes focuses on real-time operational controls, whereas a strategy for manifest errors relies on the long-term integrity of legal agreements.

A central tool in this strategy is the “manifest error” or “conclusive evidence” clause. These clauses are common in loan agreements, trust deeds, and other financial contracts. They typically state that a certificate or determination of an amount by one party is conclusive and binding on all parties in the absence of manifest error. This serves two purposes.

First, it promotes certainty by limiting disputes over calculations and determinations. Second, it provides an explicit, contractually agreed-upon pathway for correcting an error that is genuinely obvious, without needing to invalidate the entire agreement.

![Robust institutional-grade structures converge on a central, glowing bi-color orb. This visualizes an RFQ protocol's dynamic interface, representing the Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery within digital asset market microstructure, enabling atomic settlement for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-engine.jpg)

## Comparative Strategic Handling of Errors

The strategic response to an error depends entirely on its classification. The following table illustrates the divergent paths taken to manage and resolve these two types of failures.

| Dimension | Simple Mistake (Operational Input Failure) | Manifest Error (System State Failure) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Primary Locus of Control | Trading Desk, Operations, Technology | Legal, Compliance, Senior Management |
| Core Mitigation Strategy | Pre-trade validation, real-time monitoring, procedural checks | Rigorous document drafting, independent review, use of standardized legal clauses |
| Detection Method | Real-time alerts, post-trade reconciliation, direct observation of anomalous market activity | Document review, audits, discovery of internal inconsistencies, failure of a commercial mechanic |
| Resolution Protocol | Exchange-defined “obvious error” rules, trade cancellation requests, negotiation with counterparty | Invocation of contractual “manifest error” clause, trustee determination, legal negotiation, or court intervention |
| Counterparty Impact | Often immediate and operational. May result in a quantifiable loss that needs to be settled. | Can be more complex, potentially requiring contractual amendment and affecting the perceived diligence of the drafting party. |

![A precise stack of multi-layered circular components visually representing a sophisticated Principal Digital Asset RFQ framework. Each distinct layer signifies a critical component within market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying liquidity aggregation across dark pools, enabling private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-layers-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## How Does Counterparty Risk Differ between Error Types?

The discovery of a simple mistake introduces immediate, quantifiable risk. If a mistaken order is filled, the institution may hold an unwanted position that is subject to market fluctuations. The strategic priority is to exit that position and quantify the loss, which then becomes a matter for settlement with the responsible party or absorption as an operational loss. The impact on the counterparty relationship is typically contained and transactional.

A manifest error carries a different kind of risk. It suggests a potential failure in a counterparty’s drafting or due diligence process. Resolving it requires a higher level of engagement, often involving legal teams.

While the “manifest error” clause provides a structured path for correction, the discovery can still lead to a re-evaluation of the counterparty’s operational competence. The strategic handling requires careful communication to correct the error while preserving the long-term institutional relationship.

![Two reflective, disc-like structures, one tilted, one flat, symbolize the Market Microstructure of Digital Asset Derivatives. This metaphor encapsulates RFQ Protocols and High-Fidelity Execution within a Liquidity Pool for Price Discovery, vital for a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-optimizing-market-microstructure-principal-trading-best-execution-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The execution protocols for rectifying simple mistakes and manifest errors operate in entirely different spheres. The former is a time-sensitive operational procedure governed by market rules, while the latter is a methodical, evidence-based process guided by [contract law](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and institutional discretion. For any market participant, mastering the execution of both is a critical component of a resilient operational framework.

![A stacked, multi-colored modular system representing an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The top unit facilitates RFQ protocol initiation and dynamic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-15.jpg)

## Executing a Correction for a Simple Mistake the Obvious Error Rule

When a simple mistake leads to a trade at a price significantly detached from the prevailing market, exchanges provide a specific, rules-based remedy. This is often called an “[Obvious Error](https://prime.greeks.live/area/obvious-error/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” or “Clearly Erroneous” transaction rule. This protocol is designed for speed and objectivity, replacing subjective negotiation with a clear, quantitative framework. The Nasdaq Options Market provides a clear example of such a protocol in execution.

The process begins with one of the parties to the trade filing an “Obvious Error Transaction Request” with the exchange, typically within a very short time frame (e.g. minutes) of the transaction. An exchange official then determines if the trade qualifies as an Obvious Error by comparing the [execution price](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to the “[Theoretical Price](https://prime.greeks.live/area/theoretical-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” of the option at that time. The Theoretical Price is a benchmark calculated by the exchange based on prevailing market conditions. If the execution price deviates from this benchmark by a predefined amount, the error is confirmed.

![A precisely engineered multi-component structure, split to reveal its granular core, symbolizes the complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor represents the unbundling of multi-leg spreads, facilitating transparent price discovery and high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-revealing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-within-principals-operational-framework.jpg)

## Quantitative Thresholds for Obvious Errors

The exchange removes subjectivity by publishing the exact price deviations that constitute an error. This quantitative approach ensures all participants are subject to the same, predictable rules. The table below provides a model based on the Nasdaq policy, illustrating how the required deviation changes with the price of the instrument.

| Theoretical Price Range | Minimum Deviation to Declare Obvious Error | Example Theoretical Price | Execution Price Triggering Error (Buy) | Execution Price Triggering Error (Sell) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Below $2.00 | $0.25 | $1.50 | $1.75 or higher | $1.25 or lower |
| $2.00 – $5.00 | $0.40 | $3.00 | $3.40 or higher | $2.60 or lower |
| Above $5.00 – $10.00 | $0.50 | $8.00 | $8.50 or higher | $7.50 or lower |
| Above $10.00 – $20.00 | $0.80 | $15.00 | $15.80 or higher | $14.20 or lower |
| Above $20.00 – $50.00 | $1.00 | $35.00 | $36.00 or higher | $34.00 or lower |
| Above $50.00 – $100.00 | $1.50 | $75.00 | $76.50 or higher | $73.50 or lower |
| Above $100.00 | $2.00 | $120.00 | $122.00 or higher | $118.00 or lower |

Once an Obvious Error is confirmed, the exchange will take corrective action. This typically involves either adjusting the trade price to the Theoretical Price plus or minus the permitted deviation, or busting (nullifying) the trade entirely. The specific action can depend on whether a customer account was involved. This entire process is an execution-focused protocol designed to maintain a fair and orderly market by quickly resolving clear operational failures.

![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Executing a Correction for a Manifest Error the Discretionary Protocol

The execution protocol for a manifest error is fundamentally different. It is not governed by high-speed exchange rules but by the terms of the governing legal document and principles of contract law. This process is slower, more deliberative, and evidence-based.

- 
**Identification and Assertion** One party identifies a potential manifest error within a contract or certificate. They must then assert this to the relevant counterparty or decision-maker (such as a trustee in a bond issuance).

- 
**Evidence Gathering** The asserting party must gather evidence to prove the error is “manifest.” This can include draft versions of the document, email correspondence detailing the commercial terms, or other materials that demonstrate the clear intent of the parties. The error must be “easily demonstrable without extensive investigation.”

- 
**Decision-Making** The decision to amend the document rests with the party granted that authority in the contract. In a bilateral loan agreement, this may require the consent of both parties. In a capital markets transaction, a trustee may have the discretionary power to approve the correction if it is satisfied the error is indeed manifest and the change is not materially prejudicial to the interests of the noteholders. The decision-maker must act independently and within the fiduciary duties they owe.

- 
**Documentation and Amendment** If the correction is approved, the legal document is formally amended to reflect the true intent. This creates a permanent, legally binding record of the correction, ensuring the system’s state is accurately recorded for the future.

> The execution of an obvious error correction is a rapid, quantitative process managed by an exchange, while the execution of a manifest error correction is a deliberative, evidence-based procedure guided by contract law.

This protocol is also seen in the terms of service for digital asset exchanges. A platform like Binance reserves the right to void or amend any transaction deriving from a Manifest Error, acting as the central arbiter to correct the record to what it “reasonably consider to be the correct or fair details.” In this context, the exchange itself assumes the role of the decision-maker, executing a correction based on its own determination of a manifest failure in its trading system or price feeds.

![The abstract image visualizes a central Crypto Derivatives OS hub, precisely managing institutional trading workflows. Sharp, intersecting planes represent RFQ protocols extending to liquidity pools for options trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## References

- Clifford Chance. “MANIFEST ERROR ▴ A FRESH PERSPECTIVE?” 1 July 2023.

- Gateley. “Manifest error ▴ how obvious must it be?” 5 February 2024.

- Binance. “Terms.” 6 May 2025.

- Nasdaq. “Obvious Error Transactions Policy.” Nasdaq Trader.

- Hawley, Alan. “Is there a difference between “manifest error” and “demonstrable error” in the law of contract?” Practical Law, 7 December 2012.

![Engineered object with layered translucent discs and a clear dome encapsulating an opaque core. Symbolizing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, it represents a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-intelligence-engine.jpg)

## Reflection

The architecture of financial systems, from legal contracts to high-frequency trading platforms, is built upon a foundation of rules designed to ensure integrity and predictability. The protocols distinguishing a simple mistake from a manifest error are a core component of that foundation. They provide the system with the resilience to handle both human operational faults and its own intrinsic flaws. Reflecting on your own operational framework, consider the points of potential failure.

Are your pre-trade controls sufficiently robust to catch input errors? Are your legal agreements fortified with clear mechanisms for correcting documentary flaws? A truly superior operational edge is achieved when the system is engineered not only for optimal performance but also for elegant and efficient failure recovery.

![A polished, cut-open sphere reveals a sharp, luminous green prism, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework. The reflective interior denotes market microstructure insights and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-alpha-intelligence.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/simple-mistake/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-component mechanism features a light upper segment meeting a darker, textured lower part. A diagonal bar pivots on a circular sensor, signifying High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ Protocols for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-with-prime-os-integration.jpg)

## Simple Mistake

Meaning ▴ A simple mistake, in the context of financial operations and systems architecture, refers to an easily identifiable and rectifiable error that results from human oversight, incorrect data entry, or a basic logical flaw. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/manifest-error/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated institutional-grade system's internal mechanics. A central metallic wheel, symbolizing an algorithmic trading engine, sits above glossy surfaces with luminous data pathways and execution triggers](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core.jpg)

## Manifest Error

Meaning ▴ Manifest Error refers to an obvious and unmistakable mistake in a financial transaction or contract, readily apparent to any reasonable person. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/exchange-rules/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An Execution Management System module, with intelligence layer, integrates with a liquidity pool hub and RFQ protocol component. This signifies atomic settlement and high-fidelity execution within an institutional grade Prime RFQ, ensuring capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-orchestrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Exchange Rules

Meaning ▴ Exchange Rules, within the crypto trading ecosystem, are the codified regulations, policies, and operational procedures that govern participation, trading activity, and settlement on a centralized digital asset exchange. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/from-a-quantitative-perspective-how-is-rfq-price-quality-measured-beyond-simple-slippage/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Beige and teal angular modular components precisely connect on black, symbolizing critical system integration for a Principal's operational framework. This represents seamless interoperability within a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution, efficient price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-os-interop.jpg)

## Simple Mistakes

Measuring RFQ price quality beyond slippage requires quantifying the information leakage and adverse selection costs embedded in every quote. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-differentiate-between-systemic-and-idiosyncratic-causes-of-partial-fill-errors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Internal mechanism with translucent green guide, dark components. Represents Market Microstructure of Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Manifest Errors

Differentiating fill errors requires a diagnostic framework that contrasts single-order anomalies against correlated, market-wide execution decay. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/operational-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent sphere, representing a digital asset option, rests on an aqua geometric RFQ execution venue. This proprietary liquidity pool integrates with an opaque institutional grade infrastructure, depicting high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a Principal's operational framework for Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-prime-os.jpg)

## Operational Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Operational Risk Management, in the context of crypto investing, RFQ crypto, and broader crypto technology, refers to the systematic process of identifying, assessing, monitoring, and mitigating risks arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems, or from external events. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pre-trade-controls/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A spherical Liquidity Pool is bisected by a metallic diagonal bar, symbolizing an RFQ Protocol and its Market Microstructure. Imperfections on the bar represent Slippage challenges in High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization-within-principals-market-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Pre-Trade Controls

Meaning ▴ Pre-Trade Controls are automated, systematic checks and rigorous validation processes meticulously implemented within crypto trading systems to prevent unintended, erroneous, or non-compliant trades before their transmission to any execution venue. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms depict a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine. A central mechanism, representing price discovery and atomic settlement, integrates horizontal liquidity streams](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-2.jpg)

## Contract Law

Meaning ▴ Contract Law constitutes the foundational legal framework governing agreements between parties, establishing the principles of offer, acceptance, consideration, and enforceability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/obvious-error/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Obvious Error

Meaning ▴ An Obvious Error constitutes a manifest and unambiguous mistake within a trade execution, quoted price, or data entry that fundamentally deviates from prevailing market conditions or established operational parameters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/theoretical-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-segmented sphere embodies a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent 'intelligence layer' signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine.jpg)

## Theoretical Price

Meaning ▴ Theoretical price refers to the estimated fair value of a financial instrument, typically a derivative like an option or a futures contract, derived from a mathematical model based on underlying asset characteristics and market parameters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution Price

Meaning ▴ Execution Price refers to the definitive price at which a trade, whether involving a spot cryptocurrency or a derivative contract, is actually completed and settled on a trading venue. </a>

**Tags:** [Financial System Architecture](https://options.greeks.live/area/financial-system-architecture/), [Counterparty Risk](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/), [Pre-Trade Controls](https://options.greeks.live/area/pre-trade-controls/), [Exchange Rules](https://options.greeks.live/area/exchange-rules/), [Execution Price](https://options.greeks.live/area/execution-price/), [Manifest Error](https://options.greeks.live/area/manifest-error/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can Data Analytics Quantify the Risk of Information Leakage in an RFQ?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-data-analytics-quantify-the-risk-of-information-leakage-in-an-rfq/)
![Abstract geometric forms, including overlapping planes and central spherical nodes, visually represent a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. It depicts complex multi-leg spread execution, dynamic RFQ protocol liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic trading within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution-alpha-generation-prime-os-capital-efficiency.jpg)

Data analytics quantifies RFQ information leakage by modeling counterparty behavior to predict and minimize execution impact.

- 
### [How Does Real-Time Data Ingestion Impact Block Trade Reconciliation Latency?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-real-time-data-ingestion-impact-block-trade-reconciliation-latency/)
![Institutional-grade infrastructure supports a translucent circular interface, displaying real-time market microstructure for digital asset derivatives price discovery. Geometric forms symbolize precise RFQ protocol execution, enabling high-fidelity multi-leg spread trading, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating systemic risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-intelligence-layer.jpg)

Real-time data ingestion transforms reconciliation from delayed verification into immediate state validation, collapsing risk exposure.

- 
### [What Are the Core Risk Management Protocols in High-Speed Quote Systems?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-core-risk-management-protocols-in-high-speed-quote-systems/)
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives execution platform showcases its core market microstructure. A speckled surface depicts real-time market data streams. A teal intelligence layer optimizes price discovery, channeling through a central metallic hub, symbolizing robust atomic settlement and deep liquidity pool integration for institutional RFQ execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-microstructure.jpg)

High-speed quote systems necessitate integrated pre-trade validations, real-time surveillance, and post-trade analytics to ensure capital preservation and execution integrity.

- 
### [Execute Block Trades without Moving the Market Price](https://options.greeks.live/guide/execute-block-trades-without-moving-the-market-price/)
![Diagonal composition of sleek metallic infrastructure with a bright green data stream alongside a multi-toned teal geometric block. This visualizes High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating RFQ Price Discovery within deep Liquidity Pools, critical for institutional Block Trades and Multi-Leg Spreads on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-optimization-leveraging-proprietary-institutional-prime-os-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-latency-reduction.jpg)

Command institutional-grade liquidity and execute large trades with zero market impact using professional RFQ systems.

- 
### [What Is the Process for Determining a Reference Price during a Corporate Action?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-process-for-determining-a-reference-price-during-a-corporate-action/)
![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

The process for determining a reference price is a rules-based exchange protocol to adjust a security's value post-corporate action.

- 
### [How Can a Centralized Communication Protocol Mitigate RFP Clarification Risks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-centralized-communication-protocol-mitigate-rfp-clarification-risks/)
![Abstract visualization of an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its segmented core and reflective arcs depict advanced RFQ protocols, real-time price discovery, and dynamic market microstructure, optimizing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for block trades within a Principal's framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-interface.jpg)

A centralized communication protocol mitigates RFP clarification risks by creating a single, auditable source of truth, ensuring informational parity among all participants.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between Challenging an Expert’s Decision and Appealing an Arbitration Award?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-challenging-an-experts-decision-and-appealing-an-arbitration-award/)
![A diagonal composition contrasts a blue intelligence layer, symbolizing market microstructure and volatility surface, with a metallic, precision-engineered execution engine. This depicts high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Challenging an expert's decision attacks a contractual process; appealing an arbitration award contests a quasi-judicial outcome.

- 
### [How Do Institutional Risk Management Protocols Adapt to High-Speed Crypto Options RFQ Environments?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-institutional-risk-management-protocols-adapt-to-high-speed-crypto-options-rfq-environments/)
![Precision system for institutional digital asset derivatives. Translucent elements denote multi-leg spread structures and RFQ protocols. Perforated bar implies co-location for latency optimization within a Principal's operational framework, ensuring high-fidelity execution and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-infrastructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

Institutional risk protocols adapt through real-time data integration, dynamic algorithmic controls, and multi-venue liquidity optimization for superior execution.

- 
### [What Are the Key Tca Metrics for Evaluating Rfq Algorithmic Performance?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-tca-metrics-for-evaluating-rfq-algorithmic-performance/)
![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

Key RFQ TCA metrics quantify counterparty behavior and price improvement to create a systemic execution advantage.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Difference between a Simple Mistake and a Manifest Error?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-mistake-and-a-manifest-error/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-mistake-and-a-manifest-error/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Difference between a Simple Mistake and a Manifest Error? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A simple mistake is an operational input error; a manifest error is a self-evident flaw within a system's official record. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-mistake-and-a-manifest-error/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-03T17:44:38+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-24T16:46:48+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated execution engine is depicted: beige data input, dark data stream, teal liquidity pool reel with clear processing head. This embodies an advanced RFQ protocol, facilitating high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread strategies and optimal price discovery. It mitigates latency, ensuring capital efficiency via smart order routing, pivotal for institutional prime brokerage within a Crypto Derivatives OS intelligence layer, bolstering systemic resilience."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Conclusive Evidence Clause",
        "Contract Law",
        "Contractual Integrity",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Exchange Rules",
        "Execution Price",
        "Financial System Architecture",
        "Manifest Error",
        "Obvious Error",
        "Obvious Error Rule",
        "Operational Risk Management",
        "Pre-Trade Controls",
        "Simple Mistake",
        "Theoretical Price",
        "Trade Cancellation",
        "Trustee Discretion"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Is The Evidentiary Threshold For A Manifest Error?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The threshold for proving a manifest error is deliberately high to preserve the principle of contractual finality. Parties cannot simply undo agreements they regret by claiming a mistake. The error must be incontrovertible. For example, in capital markets transactions, a trust deed may grant a trustee the power to amend a document to correct a manifest error without requiring a full vote of the noteholders. This is a powerful tool for efficiency, but the trustee must be independently satisfied that the error is indeed manifest, protecting the interests of all stakeholders. This process acknowledges that while contracts are meant to be definitive, they are created by humans and can contain flaws so significant that enforcing them as written would defy the clear and commonly understood purpose of the agreement."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does Counterparty Risk Differ Between Error Types?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The discovery of a simple mistake introduces immediate, quantifiable risk. If a mistaken order is filled, the institution may hold an unwanted position that is subject to market fluctuations. The strategic priority is to exit that position and quantify the loss, which then becomes a matter for settlement with the responsible party or absorption as an operational loss. The impact on the counterparty relationship is typically contained and transactional."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-mistake-and-a-manifest-error/
