# What Is the Difference between a Simple Scoring and a Weighted Scoring Model in Rfp Evaluation? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-10
**Categories:** Question

---

![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Concept

The evaluation of a Request for Proposal (RFP) represents a critical juncture in an organization’s [strategic procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process. It is the mechanism through which potential partners are assessed, and the foundation for future collaboration is laid. At the heart of this mechanism lies the [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), an analytical instrument designed to bring objectivity and structure to what can be a complex, multi-variable decision.

The fundamental distinction between a simple and a [weighted scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is rooted in the strategic intent of the evaluation itself. It is a choice between treating all evaluation criteria as uniform in value versus architecting a decision framework that mirrors the organization’s unique [strategic priorities](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

A [simple scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/simple-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) operates on the principle of equivalence. In this framework, each criterion within the RFP is assigned a score, typically on a predefined scale (e.g. 1 to 5), and the final assessment is an aggregation of these raw scores. Every question or requirement carries the same intrinsic importance as every other.

This approach provides a straightforward and transparent method for comparing vendor responses, transforming qualitative proposals into a quantitative ranking. Its value lies in its clarity and ease of implementation, offering a rapid, at-a-glance comparison that is easily understood by all stakeholders. The simple model is akin to a foundational ledger, recording each entry with equal weight, providing a clear but un-nuanced final tally.

> A simple scoring model provides a clear, unweighted tally of vendor capabilities, treating all criteria as equally important.

Conversely, a [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model functions as a more sophisticated decision-making engine, engineered to reflect the specific strategic landscape of the procuring entity. This model acknowledges that not all criteria are created equal; some factors are inherently more critical to the success of a project or partnership than others. In this system, each criterion is first assigned a weight ▴ typically a percentage ▴ that signifies its relative importance. A vendor’s score on any given criterion is then multiplied by that criterion’s weight, producing a [weighted score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

The sum of these weighted scores determines the final ranking. This methodology allows an organization to embed its strategic DNA directly into the evaluation framework, ensuring that the final decision is systematically aligned with its most important objectives, be they technological superiority, cost-efficiency, long-term support, or innovation.

![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## The Principle of Uniformity in Simple Scoring

The operational premise of a [simple scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model is its commitment to uniformity. This model is predicated on the assumption that a comprehensive list of requirements can be developed where each item contributes equally to the desired outcome. The evaluation process becomes a systematic checklist, where the vendor who satisfies the most requirements to the highest degree, regardless of their nature, emerges as the leader.

This method is most effective in scenarios where the requirements are homogenous and the procurement is transactional. For example, when sourcing a standardized commodity or a service with clearly defined, non-negotiable specifications, a simple scoring model can efficiently identify the most compliant bidder without introducing unnecessary complexity.

The strength of this approach is its inherent resistance to subjective bias during the scoring phase. Because no single criterion is designated as more important than another, evaluators are guided to focus solely on the merit of the response to each specific question. This can foster a sense of fairness and impartiality, as the final ranking is a direct reflection of the raw scores assigned.

The process is highly transparent and easily auditable, as the path from individual scores to the final result is a simple matter of addition. This clarity can be particularly valuable in public sector procurement or in organizations with stringent compliance mandates, where the ability to demonstrate a clear and unambiguous evaluation process is paramount.

![A high-precision, dark metallic circular mechanism, representing an institutional-grade RFQ engine. Illuminated segments denote dynamic price discovery and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-7.jpg)

## Strategic Calibration through Weighted Scoring

The weighted scoring model is an instrument of strategic calibration. Its adoption signifies a shift from a purely compliance-based evaluation to one that is driven by strategic intent. The process of [assigning weights](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-manage-stakeholder-disagreement-when-assigning-rfp-weights/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is, in itself, a valuable strategic exercise, compelling the procurement team and key stakeholders to engage in a deep discussion about what truly matters for the success of the initiative.

This process forces a clear articulation of priorities, translating high-level business objectives into a tangible, quantitative evaluation framework. For instance, if a company is pursuing a digital transformation initiative where seamless system integration is the paramount concern, the criteria related to API capabilities and technical support can be assigned a significantly higher weight than criteria related to the vendor’s company history or office locations.

This ability to differentiate between the essential and the desirable is the core power of the [weighted model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-operational-challenges-in-implementing-a-volatility-weighted-historical-simulation-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It ensures that a vendor who excels in the most critical areas will be recognized, even if they are less competitive on lower-priority items. A proposal with a slightly higher cost, for example, might still achieve the top rank if it demonstrates superior performance on heavily weighted criteria like security protocols and data governance, reflecting the organization’s risk appetite and strategic priorities.

This prevents the evaluation from being skewed by less significant factors and aligns the procurement outcome with the organization’s long-term strategic goals. The weighted model transforms the [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from a simple accounting exercise into a sophisticated tool for strategic execution.

![A specialized hardware component, showcasing a robust metallic heat sink and intricate circuit board, symbolizes a Prime RFQ dedicated hardware module for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-dedicated-hardware-for-institutional-rfq-execution.jpg)

![A slender metallic probe extends between two curved surfaces. This abstractly illustrates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, driving price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic decision to employ either a simple or a weighted scoring model is a defining moment in the architecture of a procurement operation. This choice dictates the very nature of the dialogue between the procuring organization and potential vendors, and it fundamentally shapes the criteria for success. Opting for a simple scoring model sends a clear message of standardization and compliance. It signals to the market that the organization has a well-defined set of equivalent needs and is seeking the partner who can most comprehensively fulfill them.

Conversely, the implementation of a weighted scoring model is a declaration of strategic priorities. It communicates that the organization is seeking a partner who aligns with a specific vision of value, where certain capabilities are disproportionately more important than others.

![A robust metallic framework supports a teal half-sphere, symbolizing an institutional grade digital asset derivative or block trade processed within a Prime RFQ environment. This abstract view highlights the intricate market microstructure and high-fidelity execution of an RFQ protocol, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage through precise system interaction](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Deploying Simple Scoring for Operational Clarity

A simple scoring framework is a strategic tool for achieving operational clarity and speed in the [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Its primary advantage lies in its straightforwardness, which can significantly reduce the administrative overhead and complexity of an evaluation. This model is strategically sound when the procurement objective is clear-cut and the solution is largely commoditized.

In such cases, the primary goal is to efficiently identify a vendor that meets a baseline of non-negotiable requirements at a competitive price. The simple score becomes a proxy for overall compliance and capability.

This approach is particularly effective in the following scenarios:

- **Tactical Procurements** ▴ For routine purchases of goods or services where the specifications are standardized and there is little room for differentiation in quality or approach, a simple model provides a fast and efficient path to a decision.

- **Preliminary Vetting** ▴ In a multi-stage evaluation process, a simple scoring model can be used in the initial phase to quickly screen a large pool of applicants and identify a shortlist of qualified vendors who meet the basic, mandatory criteria.

- **Compliance-Driven Environments** ▴ In highly regulated industries or public sector contexts, the transparency and auditability of a simple scoring model can be a strategic asset, minimizing the risk of procurement challenges and demonstrating fairness.

The strategic limitation of the simple model, however, is its inability to capture and quantify strategic nuance. By treating all criteria as equal, it runs the risk of selecting a vendor who is a “jack of all trades, master of none” ▴ a vendor who scores adequately across the board but excels in none of the areas that are truly critical for long-term success. This can lead to a suboptimal outcome if the project has underlying strategic complexities that are not reflected in a uniform scoring system.

![Angular translucent teal structures intersect on a smooth base, reflecting light against a deep blue sphere. This embodies RFQ Protocol architecture, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dynamic-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Harnessing Weighted Scoring for Strategic Alignment

The strategic power of a weighted scoring model is its capacity to ensure profound alignment between [vendor selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and core business objectives. This model transforms the RFP from a static requirements document into a dynamic expression of the organization’s strategic will. The process of assigning weights forces an internal consensus on what constitutes value, making the evaluation a deliberate and strategic exercise. A weighted model is the superior strategic choice when the procurement is complex, high-stakes, and integral to the organization’s competitive positioning.

> A weighted scoring model is a system designed to translate an organization’s strategic priorities into a quantifiable and defensible vendor selection decision.

This model is most potent when applied to:

- **Strategic Partnerships** ▴ When selecting a long-term partner for a critical business function, such as an enterprise software provider or an outsourcing partner, a weighted model ensures that factors like cultural fit, innovation capacity, and long-term viability are given appropriate consideration.

- **Complex Technology Procurements** ▴ For technology solutions where specific features, integration capabilities, or security protocols are paramount, weighting allows the evaluation to focus intensely on these make-or-break criteria.

- **Value-Based Sourcing** ▴ When the goal is to select a vendor based on the best overall value rather than the lowest price, a weighted model allows for a sophisticated trade-off analysis between cost and other critical factors like quality, service, and risk.

The table below illustrates the strategic positioning of each model based on key procurement characteristics.

| Procurement Characteristic | Simple Scoring Model (Strategic Application) | Weighted Scoring Model (Strategic Application) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Complexity of Need | Low to moderate; requirements are well-defined and largely standardized. | High; requirements are complex, multi-faceted, and have varying degrees of importance. |
| Strategic Importance | Tactical or operational; supports ongoing business functions. | Strategic; directly impacts competitive advantage, core operations, or long-term goals. |
| Primary Driver | Compliance and cost-efficiency. | Value, strategic fit, and risk mitigation. |
| Vendor Differentiation | Based on breadth of compliance across all requirements. | Based on depth of excellence in high-priority areas. |
| Stakeholder Alignment | Achieved through adherence to a clear, uniform standard. | Achieved through a collaborative process of defining and prioritizing criteria. |

The implementation of a weighted scoring model does require a greater upfront investment in time and resources. The process of defining criteria and assigning weights can be contentious and requires careful facilitation to ensure buy-in from all stakeholders. There is also a risk of over-engineering the model, creating a system so complex that it becomes opaque.

However, when executed with discipline, the weighted model provides a robust, defensible, and strategically aligned framework for making critical procurement decisions. It elevates the evaluation from a simple comparison to a true exercise in [strategic sourcing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

![A clear glass sphere, symbolizing a precise RFQ block trade, rests centrally on a sophisticated Prime RFQ platform. The metallic surface suggests intricate market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery for institutional grade trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-2.jpg)

![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of an [RFP scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model is where strategic theory is translated into operational practice. The integrity of the final decision rests entirely on the rigor and discipline applied during this phase. While both simple and weighted models require a structured approach, the execution of a weighted model demands a significantly higher degree of analytical precision and stakeholder management. It is a multi-stage process that moves from the high-level articulation of strategy to the granular mechanics of quantitative evaluation.

![A sharp, teal blade precisely dissects a cylindrical conduit. This visualizes surgical high-fidelity execution of block trades for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Implementing a Simple Scoring Protocol

The execution of a simple scoring model is a streamlined process focused on consistency and clarity. The primary steps are as follows:

- **Define Criteria** ▴ Develop a comprehensive list of all requirements, questions, and desired attributes. Each item should be discrete and measurable.

- **Establish a Rating Scale** ▴ A consistent rating scale must be defined and communicated to all evaluators. A common choice is a 1-5 scale, where each number corresponds to a clear performance level (e.g. 1=Does Not Meet Requirement, 3=Meets Requirement, 5=Exceeds Requirement).

- **Score Responses** ▴ Evaluators review the vendor proposals and assign a score to each criterion based on the predefined scale. It is critical to ensure that all evaluators are applying the scale consistently.

- **Aggregate Scores** ▴ The scores for all criteria are summed for each vendor. The vendor with the highest total score is ranked first.

The key to successful execution is the quality of the rating scale and the training of the evaluators. A well-defined rubric that provides clear examples for each score level can significantly improve the objectivity and consistency of the evaluation. While simple in its mathematics, this model’s effectiveness is still dependent on the diligence of the human evaluators.

![A sleek, translucent fin-like structure emerges from a circular base against a dark background. This abstract form represents RFQ protocols and price discovery in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighted Scoring

Executing a weighted scoring model is a more involved undertaking that constitutes a strategic project in its own right. It requires a disciplined, multi-phase approach to ensure that the final output is both mathematically sound and strategically meaningful.

![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

## Phase 1 ▴ Identification of Strategic Pillars

Before any criteria are written, the evaluation committee, comprising key stakeholders from across the organization, must define the [strategic pillars](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-pillars-of-a-mifid-ii-compliant-best-execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of the procurement. These are the 3-5 high-level objectives that the chosen solution or partner must support. Examples might include “Enhancing Operational Efficiency,” “Strengthening Data Security Posture,” or “Accelerating Time to Market.” This initial step grounds the entire process in the organization’s strategic context.

![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

## Phase 2 ▴ Criterion Development and Categorization

With the strategic pillars established, the team can now develop the specific [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Each criterion should be directly linked to one of the strategic pillars. These criteria are then grouped into logical categories, which will form the basis of the weighting scheme. Common categories include:

- **Technical Capabilities** ▴ This category assesses the core functionality and performance of the proposed solution.

- **Cost and Commercials** ▴ This includes not only the initial price but also the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), licensing models, and contractual terms.

- **Implementation and Support** ▴ This evaluates the vendor’s proposed methodology for deployment, training, and ongoing technical support.

- **Vendor Viability and Vision** ▴ This assesses the vendor’s financial stability, market reputation, and product roadmap.

![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Phase 3 ▴ The Mechanics of Weight Allocation

This is the most critical phase of the execution. The team must assign a weight to each category and, in some cases, to individual criteria within a category. The sum of all category weights must equal 100%. This process transforms the evaluation from a simple checklist into a sophisticated model of the organization’s priorities.

For example, a company procuring a critical cybersecurity platform might assign weights as follows ▴ Technical Capabilities (40%), Implementation and Support (25%), Vendor Viability (20%), and Cost (15%). This weighting scheme explicitly states that the technical strength of the solution is nearly three times more important than its price.

> The act of assigning weights in a scoring model is the definitive translation of strategic intent into a quantifiable, operational directive.

![Sleek, angled structures intersect, reflecting a central convergence. Intersecting light planes illustrate RFQ Protocol pathways for Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution in Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-microstructure.jpg)

## Phase 4 ▴ Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

Once the weights are set, the scoring process can begin. Evaluators score each criterion on a consistent scale (e.g. 1-10). The raw score for each criterion is then multiplied by its assigned weight to calculate the weighted score.

The weighted scores for all criteria are then summed to arrive at the vendor’s total score. The table below provides a detailed example of a weighted scoring model in action for a hypothetical software procurement.

| Evaluation Category (Weight) | Criterion | Criterion Weight | Vendor A Raw Score (1-10) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Raw Score (1-10) | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical (40%) | Core Functionality | 20% | 9 | 1.80 | 7 | 1.40 |
| Cost (15%) | License Fee | 10% | 6 | 0.60 | 9 | 0.90 |
| Support (25%) | SLA Guarantees | 15% | 8 | 1.20 | 8 | 1.20 |
| Viability (20%) | Financial Stability | 10% | 9 | 0.90 | 7 | 0.70 |
| Total | | 100% | | 7.95 | | 8.00 |

In this scenario, Vendor A has stronger core functionality and is more financially stable. However, Vendor B’s superior integration capabilities and product roadmap, combined with a more competitive price, give it a slight edge in the final weighted score. This outcome, which might have been different under a simple scoring model, is a direct result of the strategic priorities embedded in the weighting scheme. The model has successfully identified the vendor that provides the best overall value according to the organization’s predefined criteria.

![A precision metallic mechanism with radiating blades and blue accents, representing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, leveraging dark liquidity and smart order routing within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-engine.jpg)

## References

- Bergman, M. A. & Lundberg, S. (2013). Tender evaluation and supplier selection in public procurement. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19 (2), 73-83.

- Chai, J. Liu, J. N. & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection ▴ A systematic review of the state of the art. Omega, 41 (5), 891-905.

- Ho, W. Xu, X. & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202 (1), 16-24.

- De Boer, L. Labro, E. & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European journal of purchasing & supply management, 7 (2), 75-89.

- Kannan, D. & Tan, K. C. (2005). A structured methodology for selecting a right 3PL provider. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16 (2), 224-245.

- Handfield, R. Walton, S. Sroufe, R. & Melnyk, S. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment ▴ A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141 (1), 70-87.

- Sarkis, J. & Talluri, S. (2002). A model for strategic supplier selection. Journal of supply chain management, 38 (1), 18-28.

- Weber, C. A. Current, J. R. & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European journal of operational research, 50 (1), 2-18.

![A metallic cylindrical component, suggesting robust Prime RFQ infrastructure, interacts with a luminous teal-blue disc representing a dynamic liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives. A precise golden bar diagonally traverses, symbolizing an RFQ-driven block trade path, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure for institutional grade operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg)

## Reflection

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Your Scoring Model as a Strategic Mirror

Ultimately, the choice of a scoring model for RFP evaluation extends far beyond a simple administrative decision. It functions as a mirror, reflecting the operational maturity, strategic clarity, and analytical rigor of the organization itself. A simple scoring model reflects a commitment to process efficiency and transparent, uniform standards. It is the language of an organization that values speed and compliance in well-understood domains.

A weighted scoring model, in contrast, reflects a deeper strategic consciousness. It is the operational language of an organization that understands its unique position in the market and has a clear vision of the specific capabilities it needs to compete and win.

The process of constructing a weighted model, with its attendant debates over priorities and weights, is a powerful mechanism for forging internal alignment. It forces a conversation that translates abstract strategic goals into a concrete, quantitative framework. The resulting model is more than just an evaluation tool; it is a codified expression of the organization’s strategy. When you present a weighted scorecard to a potential partner, you are showing them the precise architecture of your needs.

You are providing them with a blueprint for how to succeed with you. Therefore, the question is not simply which model is better, but which model most accurately reflects the strategic reality of your organization and the specific procurement at hand. The optimal choice is the one that provides the clearest path to a partnership that creates sustainable, long-term value.

![A sleek, light interface, a Principal's Prime RFQ, overlays a dark, intricate market microstructure. This represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, showcasing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-system.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric planes delineate distinct institutional digital asset derivatives liquidity pools. Stark contrast signifies market microstructure shift via advanced RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-execution-protocol-integrating-rfq-liquidity-and-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategic Procurement

Meaning ▴ Strategic Procurement defines the systematic, data-driven methodology employed by institutional entities to acquire resources, services, or financial instruments, specifically within the complex domain of digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central dark aperture, like a precision matching engine, anchors four intersecting algorithmic pathways. Light-toned planes represent transparent liquidity pools, contrasting with dark teal sections signifying dark pool or latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-9.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Brushed metallic and colored modular components represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. The precise engineering signifies high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency within a sophisticated market microstructure for multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Model constitutes a systematic computational framework designed to evaluate and prioritize diverse entities by assigning distinct numerical weights to a set of predefined criteria, thereby generating a composite score that reflects their aggregated importance or suitability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent cylinder containing a white sphere floats between two curved structures, each featuring a glowing teal line. This depicts institutional-grade RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and liquidity aggregation through a Prime RFQ for optimal block trade atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

## Strategic Priorities

Weighting RFP criteria translates strategic priorities into a quantitative decision engine for defensible vendor selection. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/simple-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## Simple Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Simple Scoring Model constitutes a quantitative framework designed to assign a singular numerical value to a set of predefined attributes or inputs, facilitating a systematic and objective basis for comparative assessment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract forms depict interconnected institutional liquidity pools and intricate market microstructure. Sharp algorithmic execution paths traverse smooth aggregated inquiry surfaces, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-1.jpg)

## Simple Scoring

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-manage-stakeholder-disagreement-when-assigning-rfp-weights/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## Assigning Weights

Manage RFP weight disputes by architecting a quantitative, transparent evaluation protocol that translates strategic priorities into defensible data. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-operational-challenges-in-implementing-a-volatility-weighted-historical-simulation-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central RFQ engine drives block trades and price discovery with high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Model

A VWHS model's operational challenges lie in integrating dynamic volatility forecasts with historical data to create a forward-looking risk view. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise, multi-faceted geometric structure represents institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. Its sharp angles denote high-fidelity execution and price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, symbolizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished concentric metallic and glass components represent an advanced Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and order book dynamics within market microstructure, enabling efficient RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-precision.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, pointed object, merging light and dark modular components, embodies advanced market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. Its precise form represents high-fidelity execution, price discovery via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency, institutional grade alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Vendor Selection

Meaning ▴ Vendor Selection defines the systematic, analytical process undertaken by an institutional entity to identify, evaluate, and onboard third-party service providers for critical technological and operational components within its digital asset derivatives infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting transparent and opaque geometric planes, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, demonstrating multi-leg spread strategies and dark liquidity for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg)

## Strategic Sourcing

Meaning ▴ Strategic Sourcing, within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives, denotes a disciplined, systematic methodology for identifying, evaluating, and engaging with external providers of critical services and infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring

Meaning ▴ RFP Scoring defines the structured, quantitative methodology employed to evaluate and rank vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal, particularly for complex technology and service procurements within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-pillars-of-a-mifid-ii-compliant-best-execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

## Strategic Pillars

A MiFID II best execution policy is a firm's documented system for delivering and proving the best possible trading outcome for its clients. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sleek, pointed objects intersect centrally, forming an 'X' against a dual-tone black and teal background. This embodies the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating optimal price discovery and efficient cross-asset trading within a robust Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A diagonal composition contrasts a blue intelligence layer, symbolizing market microstructure and volatility surface, with a metallic, precision-engineered execution engine. This depicts high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a>

**Tags:** [Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/), [Weighted Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Multi-Criteria Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-making/), [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Create an Effective and Objective Weighted Scoring Rubric for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-effective-and-objective-weighted-scoring-rubric-for-an-rfp/)
![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution. Reflections suggest price discovery and atomic settlement in institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

A weighted scoring rubric is a decision-making system that translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable, objective vendor evaluation framework.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls When Defining and Weighting RFP Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-when-defining-and-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

Defining RFP criteria is a strategic exercise in translating value, where pitfalls lie in subjectivity, price over-indexing, and process opacity.

- 
### [How Can Quantitative Models Improve the Objectivity of Vendor Selection before an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-quantitative-models-improve-the-objectivity-of-vendor-selection-before-an-rfp/)
![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols. Outer elements reflect liquidity pool dynamics and high-fidelity execution in complex market microstructure, managing counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

Quantitative models replace subjective preference with a defensible, data-driven framework for vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Creating a Truly Effective RFP Scoring Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-creating-a-truly-effective-rfp-scoring-rubric/)
![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement. This intelligence layer optimizes price discovery, managing portfolio margin and ensuring best execution in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

An effective RFP scoring rubric is a systemically designed, weight-calibrated instrument that translates strategic priorities into objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Structure an RFP Evaluation Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-scoring-matrix/)
![A transparent teal prism on a white base supports a metallic pointer. This signifies an Intelligence Layer on Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading. It optimizes market microstructure for precise price discovery and capital efficiency via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-microstructure-liquidity.jpg)

An RFP scoring matrix is a weighted decision-support model that translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [Should the Cost Be the Most Heavily Weighted Criterion in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/should-the-cost-be-the-most-heavily-weighted-criterion-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Two smooth, teal spheres, representing institutional liquidity pools, precisely balance a metallic object, symbolizing a block trade executed via RFQ protocol. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-bridging-institutional-liquidity-pools-via-rfq-protocol-for-optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

Cost should be a significant, but not dominant, criterion in an RFP evaluation, balanced against quality, service, and long-term value.

- 
### [How Can Weighting in an RFP Scoring Matrix Be Optimized to Reflect True Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighting-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix-be-optimized-to-reflect-true-strategic-priorities/)
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

An optimized RFP scoring matrix translates strategic priorities into a quantitative decision-making framework for vendor selection.

- 
### [How Do You Structure Evaluation Criteria Differently for an RFI versus an RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-evaluation-criteria-differently-for-an-rfi-versus-an-rfp/)
![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

Differentiating RFI and RFP evaluation criteria separates broad market intelligence gathering from specific solution validation to ensure optimal procurement outcomes.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Strategies for Weighting RFP Scoring Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-strategies-for-weighting-rfp-scoring-criteria/)
![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

Effective RFP scoring weights translate strategic intent into a quantifiable, defensible procurement decision.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Difference between a Simple Scoring and a Weighted Scoring Model in Rfp Evaluation?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-scoring-and-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-rfp-evaluation/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-scoring-and-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-rfp-evaluation/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Difference between a Simple Scoring and a Weighted Scoring Model in Rfp Evaluation? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A simple scoring model tallies vendor merits equally; a weighted model calibrates scores to reflect strategic priorities. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-scoring-and-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-rfp-evaluation/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-10T03:08:49+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-10T03:08:53+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg",
        "caption": "A striking, multi-faceted crystalline sculpture with sharp, radiating elements and a central dark sphere stands against a soft, semi-circular backdrop. This abstract visual embodies the complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, where advanced RFQ protocols drive high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across fragmented liquidity. It underscores the strategic advantage of a robust Prime RFQ for managing multi-leg spreads, mitigating counterparty risk, and ensuring best execution via intelligent order routing and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Simple Scoring Model",
        "Strategic Procurement",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Evaluation",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Management",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-scoring-and-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-rfp-evaluation/
