# What Is the Difference between Payment Netting and Close out Netting? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-06
**Categories:** Question

---

![Precision metallic components converge, depicting an RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. The central mechanism signifies high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-precision.jpg)

![A focused view of a robust, beige cylindrical component with a dark blue internal aperture, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution channel. This element represents the core of an RFQ protocol system, enabling bespoke liquidity for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, minimizing slippage and information leakage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-precision-component.jpg)

## Concept

From an architectural standpoint, the financial markets are built upon layers of risk mitigation protocols. Within this structure, netting is a foundational concept, a load-bearing wall that ensures both operational efficiency and systemic integrity. The distinction between [payment netting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/payment-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and [close-out netting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a critical one.

It represents two different modes of operation within the system, one governing the flow of transactions in the normal course of business, and the other providing a robust failure-response mechanism in times of acute distress. Understanding this difference is to understand how the market maintains equilibrium and how it protects itself from catastrophic collapse.

Payment netting, also known as settlement netting, is an operational process designed for efficiency. In any active trading relationship, two counterparties may owe each other dozens or even hundreds of payments on any given day across a portfolio of transactions. Instead of each party making gross payments for every individual obligation, payment netting consolidates these flows. All amounts due in the same currency on the same day are aggregated, and a single, final figure is exchanged.

The party with the greater obligation pays the net difference to the other. This protocol dramatically reduces the number of required transactions, which in turn lowers [settlement risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/settlement-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), operational costs, and the liquidity required for daily operations. It is a mechanism for a system in a state of normal function.

> Payment netting streamlines ongoing, day-to-day transaction settlements between solvent parties to enhance operational efficiency.

Close-out netting is a fundamentally different architectural component. It is a pre-emptive defense system, codified within legal frameworks like the [ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), that activates upon a critical failure ▴ specifically, the default or bankruptcy of a counterparty. When a default event is triggered, the close-out protocol terminates all outstanding contracts between the two parties covered by the agreement. The market values of these terminated contracts are then calculated, a process known as marking-to-market.

All positive and negative values are converted to a single currency and summed into one final, net amount. This single figure represents the entirety of the financial obligation between the parties. One party will owe the other this single amount, transforming a complex web of obligations into a unified claim. This mechanism’s primary purpose is to reduce pre-settlement [credit risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/credit-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and prevent the chaotic unraveling that would occur if a bankruptcy administrator could “cherry-pick” ▴ selectively enforcing contracts profitable to the insolvent estate while disavowing unprofitable ones.

![A segmented rod traverses a multi-layered spherical structure, depicting a streamlined Institutional RFQ Protocol. This visual metaphor illustrates optimal Digital Asset Derivatives price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and robust liquidity pool integration, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow-1.jpg)

## How Does Netting Impact Systemic Risk?

The architecture of netting directly addresses the potential for financial contagion. Payment netting contributes by reducing the sheer volume of interdependent payments, minimizing the chance of an operational failure cascading through the system. A single missed payment in a gross settlement system could trigger a chain reaction of defaults, whereas under a netting regime, the interdependencies are fewer and more manageable.

Close-out netting provides a much more powerful defense against [systemic risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). In its absence, the failure of a major financial institution would leave its counterparties with massive, unhedged exposures. The [non-defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) might be legally required to pay on contracts where it owes money, while its own claims on the defaulting party would be tied up in lengthy bankruptcy proceedings with an uncertain recovery value. This asymmetry could cause the failure of otherwise solvent institutions.

Close-out netting removes this specific danger by crystallizing the net exposure at the moment of default, allowing the solvent party to quantify its position and re-hedge its market risk immediately. This legal certainty, often protected by “safe harbor” provisions in national bankruptcy codes, is a cornerstone of stability in the global derivatives market.

![Sleek, metallic form with precise lines represents a robust Institutional Grade Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. The prominent, reflective blue dome symbolizes an Intelligence Layer for Price Discovery and Market Microstructure visibility, enabling High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-engine.jpg)

![A robust green device features a central circular control, symbolizing precise RFQ protocol interaction. This enables high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure, capital efficiency, and complex options trading within a Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-for-precise-market-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

The implementation of netting within an institutional framework is a strategic imperative, directly influencing capital efficiency, counterparty risk management, and operational resilience. The two forms of netting serve distinct, yet complementary, strategic goals. Payment netting is a tool for optimizing operational performance and liquidity, while close-out netting is the legal and strategic foundation of [counterparty credit risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-credit-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) mitigation. A sophisticated institution engineers its operational and legal architecture to maximize the benefits of both.

![Abstract geometric forms, symbolizing bilateral quotation and multi-leg spread components, precisely interact with robust institutional-grade infrastructure. This represents a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating high-fidelity execution via an RFQ workflow, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-infrastructure.jpg)

## The Strategic Application of Payment Netting

The primary strategy behind payment netting is the optimization of working capital and the reduction of operational friction. By consolidating numerous gross payments into a single net transfer, an institution can achieve several key objectives:

- **Liquidity Optimization** ▴ Less cash is required to be on hand for daily settlement activities. Instead of needing to fund multiple large gross payments, a firm only needs to manage its net position, freeing up capital for other uses.

- **Reduction of Transaction Costs** ▴ Fewer transactions translate directly into lower processing fees, wire charges, and other associated costs. Over thousands of transactions, this becomes a material economic saving.

- **Mitigation of Settlement Risk** ▴ Settlement risk is the danger that one party makes its payment, but the counterparty defaults before making its reciprocal payment on the same day. By reducing the number of payments from many to one, payment netting confines this risk to a single, smaller net amount.

The table below illustrates the strategic impact of payment netting on a hypothetical set of daily foreign exchange obligations between two institutions, Bank A and Bank B.

| Transaction ID | Obligation From | Obligation To | Amount (USD) | Amount (EUR) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FX-001 | Bank A | Bank B | $10,000,000 | |
| FX-002 | Bank B | Bank A | $5,000,000 | |
| FX-003 | Bank A | Bank B | | €12,000,000 |
| FX-004 | Bank B | Bank A | $2,000,000 | |
| FX-005 | Bank B | Bank A | | €8,000,000 |

Without payment netting, four separate transactions would occur (three in USD, two in EUR, for a total of five payments if we consider the currencies separately). With payment netting applied per currency, Bank A owes a net $3,000,000 to Bank B, and Bank B owes a net €4,000,000 to Bank A. This reduces five gross payments to two net payments, simplifying operations and reducing the total value in transit.

![Stacked, glossy modular components depict an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform. Layers signify RFQ protocol orchestration, high-fidelity execution, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Close out Netting as a Core Risk Strategy

Close-out netting is a purely defensive strategy. Its value is realized only in a crisis, but its existence is what makes normal market activity possible. The strategy is enshrined in the ISDA [Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), which functions as a single, overarching contract governing all transactions between two parties. This “single agreement” concept is the legal architecture that enables close-out netting.

> Close-out netting serves as the ultimate financial backstop, transforming a chaotic default scenario into a single, manageable net obligation.

The strategic advantages are profound:

- **Prevention of Cherry-Picking** ▴ As previously mentioned, it prevents a bankruptcy administrator from selectively enforcing favorable contracts while rejecting unfavorable ones. This is the primary strategic goal.

- **Certainty of Exposure** ▴ It allows the non-defaulting party to immediately and definitively calculate its net credit exposure to the defaulter. This clarity is essential for managing the firm’s own financial health and for regulatory reporting.

- **Rapid Risk Mitigation** ▴ By terminating all contracts, the solvent party crystallizes its market risk. It is no longer exposed to market fluctuations on its positions with the failed counterparty and can enter into new, offsetting trades with other partners to re-balance its portfolio.

Without the legal enforceability of close-out netting, the credit risk associated with over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives would be so high that the market could not function at its current scale. The capital required to cover potential gross exposures would be prohibitive. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has noted that close-out netting reduces credit exposure in the OTC derivatives market by over 85%.

![A circular mechanism with a glowing conduit and intricate internal components represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. This system facilitates high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and algorithmic trading within market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core.jpg)

## What Are the Limits of These Strategies?

The effectiveness of any netting strategy is contingent on its legal enforceability. While payment netting is a widely accepted business practice, the power of close-out netting depends entirely on the legal framework of the relevant jurisdictions. Most major financial centers have passed specific legislation (often called “safe harbors”) to protect close-out netting from being challenged or stayed during bankruptcy proceedings.

However, when dealing with counterparties in jurisdictions without such explicit legal protections, the strategic value of close-out netting is diminished, and credit risk increases accordingly. Therefore, a key part of institutional strategy involves rigorous legal due diligence on the enforceability of netting for every counterparty jurisdiction.

![A sleek, dark metallic surface features a cylindrical module with a luminous blue top, embodying a Prime RFQ control for RFQ protocol initiation. This institutional-grade interface enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives block trades, ensuring private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A precise metallic and transparent teal mechanism symbolizes the intricate market microstructure of a Prime RFQ. It facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocols for private quotation, aggregated inquiry, and block trade management, ensuring best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-principal-trading-systems-driving-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocols.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of netting protocols is a function of precise operational procedures and robust legal documentation. For the systems architect, this means designing processes that are both efficient in daily operation and resilient in a crisis. The execution of payment netting is an operational workflow, while the execution of close-out netting is the enactment of a pre-planned legal and financial crisis management protocol.

![Abstract spheres and a sharp disc depict an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives ecosystem. A central Principal's Operational Framework interacts with a Liquidity Pool via RFQ Protocol for High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Payment Netting

Implementing a payment netting system requires a clear, automated, and auditable process. It moves beyond a simple agreement into a detailed operational workflow managed by dedicated systems.

- **Agreement and Confirmation** ▴ Parties must first have a master agreement, such as an ISDA, that explicitly allows for payment netting under Section 2(c). The specific transactions and currencies to be netted are defined.

- **Data Aggregation** ▴ On a given settlement day, the firm’s treasury or operations system must automatically identify all eligible payments to and from a specific counterparty. This involves pulling data from various trading systems (e.g. for FX, swaps, options).

- **Reconciliation** ▴ The system generates a preliminary netting statement. This statement is then transmitted to the counterparty, typically via a secure messaging protocol like SWIFT. The counterparty’s system performs its own calculation, and the two statements are reconciled to identify any discrepancies before the settlement cut-off time.

- **Net Calculation and Settlement** ▴ Once reconciled, a final net figure is calculated for each currency. The party that is the net payer instructs a single payment to the net receiver. This process is highly automated to handle large volumes efficiently.

- **Reporting and Auditing** ▴ The system must maintain a complete audit trail, showing all gross obligations and how they were consolidated into the final net payment. This is critical for internal controls, accounting, and regulatory oversight.

![A central hub with four radiating arms embodies an RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies. A teal sphere signifies deep liquidity for underlying assets](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimal-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Executing the Close out Netting Protocol

The execution of close-out netting is a high-stakes, time-sensitive process governed by Section 6 of the ISDA Master Agreement. It is a sequence of deliberate actions taken by the non-defaulting party to protect itself.

> The execution of close-out netting is a disciplined, legally-driven procedure to neutralize risk at the moment of counterparty failure.

The process unfolds in a series of distinct, critical steps:

- **Triggering Event** ▴ An “Event of Default” must occur. This is a precisely defined term in the ISDA agreement and can include failure to pay, bankruptcy, or other specified credit-negative events.

- **Notice of [Early Termination](https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The non-defaulting party must deliver a formal notice to the defaulting party, specifying the Event of Default and designating an “[Early Termination Date](https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination-date/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).” This notice legally terminates all outstanding transactions under the Master Agreement.

- **Valuation of Terminated Transactions** ▴ This is the most complex step. The non-defaulting party must calculate a replacement value for every single terminated transaction. This is done by determining what it would cost (or what it would receive) to enter into an economically equivalent transaction with another market participant on the Early Termination Date. This process requires sophisticated pricing models and access to real-time market data.

- **Calculation of the Net Amount** ▴ All the positive values (amounts owed to the non-defaulting party) and negative values (amounts owed by the non-defaulting party) are converted to a single, pre-agreed termination currency and summed. This produces a single net payable or receivable amount.

![A sophisticated modular component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, featuring an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Its precision engineering facilitates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency for institutional participants](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-module.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling a Close out Scenario

Consider a simplified portfolio between a non-defaulting party (Firm A) and a defaulting party (Firm B). The following table details the outstanding transactions at the time an Early Termination Date is declared.

| Trade ID | Trade Type | Notional Amount | Replacement Value (from Firm A’s perspective) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IRS-01 | Interest Rate Swap | $100,000,000 | +$5,200,000 |
| FXO-01 | FX Option | $50,000,000 | -$1,500,000 |
| IRS-02 | Interest Rate Swap | $200,000,000 | -$3,000,000 |
| CDS-01 | Credit Default Swap | $25,000,000 | +$2,100,000 |
| FXF-01 | FX Forward | $75,000,000 | +$800,000 |

The execution of the close-out calculation is as follows:

1. Sum of Positive Values (Owed to Firm A) ▴ $5,200,000 + $2,100,000 + $800,000 = $8,100,000

2. Sum of Negative Values (Owed by Firm A) ▴ -$1,500,000 + -$3,000,000 = -$4,500,000

3. **Final Close-Out Amount** ▴ $8,100,000 – $4,500,000 = $3,600,000

The result is a single, legally enforceable claim. Firm A has a claim of $3,600,000 against Firm B’s bankruptcy estate. Without close-out netting, Firm A would have to pay Firm B $4,500,000 immediately and then wait in line with other creditors to try and recover some portion of the $8,100,000 it is owed, a far more precarious and damaging position. This demonstrates the immense risk-reducing power of the protocol’s execution.

![A sleek, split capsule object reveals an internal glowing teal light connecting its two halves, symbolizing a secure, high-fidelity RFQ protocol facilitating atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents the precise execution of multi-leg spread strategies within a principal's operational framework, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-2.jpg)

## References

- Singh, Manmohan. “Collateral, Netting and Systemic Risk in the OTC Derivatives Market.” IMF Working Paper, vol. 10, no. 99, 2010.

- Gregory, Jon. “The xVA Challenge ▴ Counterparty Credit Risk, Funding, Collateral, and Capital.” Fourth Edition, Wiley Finance, 2020.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “The Importance of Close-Out Netting.” ISDA Research Note, no. 1, 2010.

- Bliss, Robert R. and George G. Kaufman. “Derivatives and Systemic Risk ▴ Netting, Collateral, and Closeout.” Journal of Financial Stability, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 55-70.

- Hull, John C. “Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives.” 11th Edition, Pearson, 2021.

- Tucker, Paul. “The Resolution of Large and Complex Financial Institutions ▴ A Summing Up.” Bank of England, Financial Stability Paper No. 30, 2014.

- Cranston, Ross. “Principles of Banking Law.” Third Edition, Oxford University Press, 2018.

- Pirrong, Craig. “The Economics of Central Clearing ▴ Theory and Practice.” ISDA Discussion Paper Series, no. 1, 2011.

- Rao, S. “Close-out Netting and Risk Management in Over-the-Counter Derivatives.” Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, vol. 24, no. 2, 2016, pp. 195-209.

- Mengle, David L. “The Importance of Netting in Financial Contracts.” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, vol. 96, no. 1, Winter 2010, pp. 1-29.

![A metallic disc intersected by a dark bar, over a teal circuit board. This visualizes Institutional Liquidity Pool access via RFQ Protocol, enabling Block Trade Execution of Digital Asset Options with High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-principal-operational-framework-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

The architecture of netting is a testament to the market’s capacity for adaptive engineering. The protocols governing payment and close-out netting are not merely administrative conveniences; they are core components of a dynamic system designed to manage complexity and contain failure. Having examined the mechanics, the strategy, and the execution, the essential question for any institutional principal is one of architectural integrity. How robust is your own firm’s implementation of these protocols?

Are your legal agreements universally enforceable across all counterparty jurisdictions? Is your operational workflow for settlement netting fully automated and resilient? The knowledge of these systems provides more than an understanding of market plumbing. It offers a framework for assessing the resilience of your own operational design and, ultimately, for solidifying your strategic position within the market ecosystem.

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A disaggregated institutional-grade digital asset derivatives module, off-white and grey, features a precise brass-ringed aperture. It visualizes an RFQ protocol interface, enabling high-fidelity execution, managing counterparty risk, and optimizing price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-modular-execution-intelligence-system.jpg)

## Close-Out Netting

Meaning ▴ Close-out netting is a legally enforceable contractual provision that, upon the occurrence of a default event by one counterparty, immediately terminates all outstanding transactions between the parties and converts all reciprocal obligations into a single, net payment or receipt. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/payment-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central teal and dark blue conduit intersects dynamic, speckled gray surfaces. This embodies institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution across fragmented liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-3.jpg)

## Payment Netting

Meaning ▴ Payment Netting in crypto refers to the process of offsetting multiple payment obligations or settlement instructions between two or more parties, reducing the gross number of transfers to a single net payment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/settlement-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An Institutional Grade RFQ Engine core for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer ensures High-Fidelity Execution, driving Optimal Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement for Aggregated Inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Settlement Risk

Meaning ▴ Settlement Risk, within the intricate crypto investing and institutional options trading ecosystem, refers to the potential exposure to financial loss that arises when one party to a transaction fails to deliver its agreed-upon obligation, such as crypto assets or fiat currency, after the other party has already completed its own delivery. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, textured module with a glossy top and silver button, featuring active RFQ protocol status indicators. This represents a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing atomic settlement and capital efficiency within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-interface-1.jpg)

## Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The ISDA Master Agreement, while originating in traditional finance, serves as a crucial foundational legal framework for institutional participants engaging in over-the-counter (OTC) crypto derivatives trading and complex RFQ crypto transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/credit-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Credit Risk

Meaning ▴ Credit Risk, within the expansive landscape of crypto investing and related financial services, refers to the potential for financial loss stemming from a borrower or counterparty's inability or unwillingness to meet their contractual obligations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central teal-lit mechanism with radiating pathways embodies a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It signifies RFQ protocol processing, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread trades, enabling atomic settlement within market microstructure via quantitative analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Non-Defaulting Party

Meaning ▴ A Non-Defaulting Party refers to the participant in a financial contract, such as a derivatives agreement or lending facility within the crypto ecosystem, that has fully adhered to its obligations while the other party has failed to do so. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular teal and dark blue planes intersect, signifying disparate liquidity pools and market segments. A translucent central hub embodies an institutional RFQ protocol's intelligent matching engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives, integral to a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-hub-for-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Systemic Risk

Meaning ▴ Systemic Risk, within the evolving cryptocurrency ecosystem, signifies the inherent potential for the failure or distress of a single interconnected entity, protocol, or market infrastructure to trigger a cascading, widespread collapse across the entire digital asset market or a significant segment thereof. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-credit-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered modular components, with teal accents, align at a central interface. This visually embodies an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating principal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-interface-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Counterparty Credit Risk

Meaning ▴ Counterparty Credit Risk, in the context of crypto investing and derivatives trading, denotes the potential for financial loss arising from a counterparty's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations in a transaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Close-up of intricate mechanical components symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. These precision parts reflect market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol framework, ensuring capital efficiency and optimal price discovery for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/engineered-core-systems-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ A Master Agreement is a standardized, foundational legal contract that establishes the overarching terms and conditions governing all future transactions between two parties for specific financial instruments, such as derivatives or foreign exchange. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination-date/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Early Termination Date

Meaning ▴ An Early Termination Date refers to a specific, contractually defined point in time, prior to a financial instrument's scheduled maturity, at which the agreement can be concluded. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/early-termination/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent teal dome, brimming with luminous particles, symbolizes a dynamic liquidity pool within an RFQ protocol. Precisely mounted metallic hardware signifies high-fidelity execution and the core intelligence layer for institutional digital asset derivatives, underpinned by granular market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Early Termination

Meaning ▴ Early Termination, within the framework of crypto financial instruments, denotes the contractual right or obligation to conclude a derivative or lending agreement prior to its originally stipulated maturity date. </a>

**Tags:** [Early Termination Date](https://options.greeks.live/area/early-termination-date/), [Close-Out Netting](https://options.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/), [Non-Defaulting Party](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/), [Early Termination](https://options.greeks.live/area/early-termination/), [Counterparty Credit Risk](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterparty-credit-risk/), [Mark-to-Market](https://options.greeks.live/area/mark-to-market/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA Agreement Affect the Calculation of Default Interest?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-agreement-affect-the-calculation-of-default-interest/)
![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement codifies a clear, commercially grounded methodology for calculating default interest, enhancing risk management.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Events of Default under the ISDA Master Agreements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-events-of-default-under-the-isda-master-agreements/)
![A central, multi-layered cylindrical component rests on a highly reflective surface. This core quantitative analytics engine facilitates high-fidelity execution. The mirrored surface symbolizes a transparent liquidity pool, optimizing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives via robust RFQ protocols. It's a critical element for efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-optimization.jpg)

The ISDA Events of Default are contractual triggers in the derivatives market's core operating system that enable a party to terminate trades and manage risk upon a counterparty's financial distress.

- 
### [What Are the Legal and Operational Challenges in Maintaining a Global Qualifying Master Netting Agreement Portfolio?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-and-operational-challenges-in-maintaining-a-global-qualifying-master-netting-agreement-portfolio/)
![A precision institutional interface features a vertical display, control knobs, and a sharp element. This RFQ Protocol system ensures High-Fidelity Execution and optimal Price Discovery, facilitating Liquidity Aggregation. It's a vital component of a Principal's Operational Framework for Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure for Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-interface.jpg)

Maintaining a global netting portfolio is an exercise in translating fragmented legal realities into a unified operational system for risk reduction.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between Netting under ISDA and Traditional Set Off?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-netting-under-isda-and-traditional-set-off/)
![A sleek, metallic multi-lens device with glowing blue apertures symbolizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine. Its precision optics enable real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution, facilitating automated price discovery and aggregated inquiry within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

ISDA netting is a contractual risk protocol; traditional set-off is a general legal right for offsetting mutual debts.

- 
### [What Is the Role of the ISDA Master Agreement in Enforcing Close-Out Netting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-the-isda-master-agreement-in-enforcing-close-out-netting/)
![Abstractly depicting an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS component. Its robust structure and metallic interface signify precise Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution of RFQ Protocol and Block Trade orders. The angular teal plane represents a transparent Liquidity Pool driving Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-integrated-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

The ISDA Master Agreement provides the essential legal architecture for enforcing close-out netting, transforming gross counterparty exposure into a single net obligation upon default.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA Standard Affect the Speed of Default Resolution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-standard-affect-the-speed-of-default-resolution/)
![A metallic structural component interlocks with two black, dome-shaped modules, each displaying a green data indicator. This signifies a dynamic RFQ protocol within an institutional Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Internal mechanisms underscore algorithmic trading and pre-trade analytics for capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA standard accelerates default resolution by mandating a single, objective Close-out Amount calculation.

- 
### [Why Was Credit Support Default Added to the 2002 ISDA Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-was-credit-support-default-added-to-the-2002-isda-agreement/)
![A sleek, multi-faceted plane represents a Principal's operational framework and Execution Management System. A central glossy black sphere signifies a block trade digital asset derivative, executed with atomic settlement via an RFQ protocol's private quotation. Textured spheres below denote collateral supporting advanced market microstructure for price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-principal-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA's Credit Support Default provision transformed collateral failure into a decisive termination event, hardening the system against counterparty risk.

- 
### [Why Is Preventing Cherry Picking so Important during a Counterparty Bankruptcy Proceeding?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-is-preventing-cherry-picking-so-important-during-a-counterparty-bankruptcy-proceeding/)
![A transparent, convex lens, intersected by angled beige, black, and teal bars, embodies institutional liquidity pool and market microstructure. This signifies RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives and multi-leg options spreads, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement via Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

Preventing cherry-picking is vital as it upholds the net economic reality of a derivatives portfolio, averting systemic financial collapse.

- 
### [How Does Collateralization Interact with the Single Agreement Concept in a Default?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-collateralization-interact-with-the-single-agreement-concept-in-a-default/)
![Abstractly depicting an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives ecosystem. A robust base supports intersecting conduits, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and smart order routing. Floating spheres represent diverse liquidity pools and crypto derivatives, emphasizing market microstructure and capital efficiency via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-optimization.jpg)

The single agreement unifies all trades into one contract, enabling collateral to secure the resulting net exposure upon default.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Difference between Payment Netting and Close out Netting?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-payment-netting-and-close-out-netting-2/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-payment-netting-and-close-out-netting-2/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Difference between Payment Netting and Close out Netting? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Payment netting optimizes operational cash flow, while close-out netting is a critical risk protocol that contains counterparty default. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-payment-netting-and-close-out-netting-2/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-06T03:47:08+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-26T15:57:21+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-15.jpg",
        "caption": "This image depicts a sophisticated modular system, symbolizing the integrated architecture of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The distinct blocks represent layers of an advanced RFQ protocol engine, enabling real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution. It illustrates a robust framework for managing complex multi-leg spreads, optimizing capital efficiency, and ensuring atomic settlement within a prime brokerage operational framework, critical for navigating market microstructure dynamics and mitigating counterparty risk."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Bankruptcy Safe Harbor",
        "Close-Out Netting",
        "Counterparty Credit Risk",
        "Credit Risk",
        "Early Termination",
        "Early Termination Date",
        "Financial Netting",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Mark-to-Market",
        "Master Agreement",
        "Non-Defaulting Party",
        "Operational Risk",
        "Payment Netting",
        "Settlement Risk",
        "Single Agreement Concept",
        "Systemic Risk"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does Netting Impact Systemic Risk?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The architecture of netting directly addresses the potential for financial contagion. Payment netting contributes by reducing the sheer volume of interdependent payments, minimizing the chance of an operational failure cascading through the system. A single missed payment in a gross settlement system could trigger a chain reaction of defaults, whereas under a netting regime, the interdependencies are fewer and more manageable."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Are The Limits Of These Strategies?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The effectiveness of any netting strategy is contingent on its legal enforceability. While payment netting is a widely accepted business practice, the power of close-out netting depends entirely on the legal framework of the relevant jurisdictions. Most major financial centers have passed specific legislation (often called \"safe harbors\") to protect close-out netting from being challenged or stayed during bankruptcy proceedings. However, when dealing with counterparties in jurisdictions without such explicit legal protections, the strategic value of close-out netting is diminished, and credit risk increases accordingly. Therefore, a key part of institutional strategy involves rigorous legal due diligence on the enforceability of netting for every counterparty jurisdiction."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-payment-netting-and-close-out-netting-2/
