# What Is the Difference between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Master Agreement Close out Standards? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-02
**Categories:** Question

---

![A refined object featuring a translucent teal element, symbolizing a dynamic RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precision embodies High-Fidelity Execution and seamless Price Discovery within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-for-optimal-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A macro view reveals a robust metallic component, signifying a critical interface within a Prime RFQ. This secure mechanism facilitates precise RFQ protocol execution, enabling atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives, embodying high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-secure-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-trade-system-element.jpg)

## Concept

The fundamental distinction between the 1992 and [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) close-out standards resides in the architecture of risk externalization during a counterparty default. The 2002 framework represents a systemic upgrade, engineered in response to the market dislocations of the late 1990s. Its design purpose was to replace the bifurcated and often contentious valuation process of the 1992 agreement with a unified, more flexible, and objectively verifiable standard. The core evolution is the replacement of the elective “[Market Quotation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” and “Loss” methodologies with the singular “Close-out Amount.” This was a direct architectural intervention intended to increase certainty, reduce disputes, and provide a more resilient mechanism for terminating derivatives portfolios in volatile market conditions.

Understanding this shift requires acknowledging the operational deficiencies of the 1992 protocol. Under that regime, the [non-defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) had to choose between two distinct valuation paths. “Market Quotation” was a procedurally rigid method requiring the solicitation of quotes from multiple dealers for replacement trades. This process proved cumbersome and often impractical during periods of systemic stress when market makers might be unwilling or unable to provide such quotes.

The alternative, “Loss,” was a more flexible but highly subjective measure, allowing the non-defaulting party to determine its total losses and costs. This subjectivity could lead to significant disputes over the final termination payment. The [2002 ISDA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) consolidates these concepts into the “[Close-out Amount](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” creating a single, more adaptable standard designed to function effectively even when market liquidity is impaired.

> The 2002 ISDA introduced the “Close-out Amount” to create a single, flexible measure of damages, replacing the dual “Market Quotation” and “Loss” options from the 1992 version.

This structural change is complemented by a heightened standard of conduct. The 2002 agreement mandates that the [determining party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/determining-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) must use “[commercially reasonable](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) procedures in order to produce a commercially reasonable result.” This introduces an objective, two-part test that governs both the process of valuation and its outcome. The 1992 agreement’s standard was less stringent, often interpreted under English law as a test of rationality, meaning a determination could stand as long as it was not one that no reasonable party could have reached. This evolution from a subjective rationality test to an objective commercial reasonableness standard is a critical component of the 2002 agreement’s design, aiming to build a more equitable and defensible close-out system.

![A sleek, futuristic apparatus featuring a central spherical processing unit flanked by dual reflective surfaces and illuminated data conduits. This system visually represents an advanced RFQ protocol engine facilitating high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-options-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-interface.jpg)

![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic impetus behind the 2002 [ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) was the mitigation of systemic risk and the reduction of legal uncertainty in derivatives markets. The flaws in the 1992 agreement’s close-out mechanism were exposed during financial crises, where the rigidity of “Market Quotation” and the ambiguity of “Loss” created significant operational and legal friction. The strategy of the 2002 revisions was to engineer a more robust and adaptable framework that could withstand market stress, thereby preserving the integrity of the [close-out netting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process, which is the bedrock of counterparty risk management in the OTC derivatives market.

![Angularly connected segments portray distinct liquidity pools and RFQ protocols. A speckled grey section highlights granular market microstructure and aggregated inquiry complexities for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-efficiency.jpg)

## What Was the Strategic Flaw in the 1992 Valuation Options?

The dual-option valuation system in the [1992 ISDA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/1992-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) presented a strategic dilemma for the non-defaulting party. The “Market Quotation” method, while appearing objective, was operationally fragile. In a crisis, the very reference points it relied upon ▴ readily available quotes from major dealers ▴ could evaporate. This forced parties toward the “Loss” calculation.

The “Loss” method, however, gave the determining party considerable discretion, which could be perceived as a license to make a self-serving valuation. This ambiguity created a high potential for protracted and costly legal challenges, undermining the goal of a swift and final settlement following a default. The 2002 ISDA’s “Close-out Amount” was designed to resolve this dilemma by providing a single methodology that blends the objectivity of [market data](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-data/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) with the flexibility needed to operate in distressed markets.

The introduction of the “Close-out Amount” was a strategic shift toward a more principles-based approach. It allows the determining party to use various sources of information ▴ including internal models, third-party quotes (without the strict procedural requirements of Market Quotation), and other relevant market data ▴ to arrive at a valuation. This flexibility is controlled by the overarching duty to act in a commercially reasonable manner. The strategy is to empower the non-defaulting party to make a realistic assessment of its economic loss while simultaneously holding it to a higher, objective standard of conduct, thereby balancing power and fairness in the close-out process.

![A gleaming, translucent sphere with intricate internal mechanisms, flanked by precision metallic probes, symbolizes a sophisticated Principal's RFQ engine. This represents the atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies, enabling high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives markets, minimizing latency and slippage for optimal alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/inst-digital-asset-deriv-rfq-os-for-optimal-high-fidelity-trade-exec.jpg)

## Strengthening the Termination Framework

The strategic enhancements in the 2002 ISDA extend beyond the valuation methodology. The agreement refines the triggers for termination to allow for more proactive risk management. This is achieved through several key modifications:

- 
**Reduced Grace Periods** ▴ The time allowed to cure a default (the “grace period”) for events like failure to pay or deliver is shortened in the 2002 version. This allows the non-defaulting party to act more quickly to limit its exposure to a deteriorating counterparty.

- 
**Expanded Default Triggers** ▴ The definition of “[Specified Transaction](https://prime.greeks.live/area/specified-transaction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” which can trigger a cross-default, was broadened. This gives parties greater ability to terminate their ISDA Master Agreement if their counterparty defaults on other types of financial transactions, providing a more holistic view of [counterparty risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- 
**Introduction of [Force Majeure](https://prime.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The 2002 ISDA introduces a “Force Majeure” Termination Event. This provides a mechanism to terminate the agreement when performance becomes impossible due to external events beyond a party’s control, such as a natural disaster or government action. This was a critical addition that addresses scenarios where a failure to perform is not due to credit-related issues.

> The 2002 ISDA enhances strategic risk management by shortening default grace periods, broadening cross-default triggers, and adding a Force Majeure termination event.

These changes, when viewed as a whole, represent a strategic re-engineering of the derivatives contract. The 2002 ISDA provides a more resilient and responsive toolkit for managing counterparty risk. It aims to create a system where the termination process is not only fair and efficient but also robust enough to function reliably during the very periods of market stress when it is most needed. The inclusion of a standard [set-off provision](https://prime.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) further streamlines the final settlement process, allowing for the netting of all amounts due between the parties, not just those arising from the terminated derivatives.

The following table provides a strategic comparison of the key close-out elements:

| Feature | 1992 ISDA Master Agreement | 2002 ISDA Master Agreement |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Primary Valuation Method | Choice of “Market Quotation” or “Loss”. | Single “Close-out Amount”. |
| Standard of Conduct | “Reasonably determines in good faith” (interpreted as a rationality test). | “Act in good faith and use commercially reasonable procedures in order to produce a commercially reasonable result” (objective test). |
| Force Majeure Event | Not included. | Included as a new Termination Event. |
| Set-Off Provision | Must be added in the Schedule. | Included as a standard provision in the main body. |

![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Execution

From an execution perspective, the transition from the 1992 to the 2002 ISDA [Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-prime-brokerage-agreement-and-an-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires a material change in the operational procedures for calculating and substantiating a close-out amount. The non-defaulting party’s obligations are more prescriptive under the 2002 framework, demanding a robust and well-documented process to satisfy the two-pronged test of commercial reasonableness. This section details the operational mechanics of executing a close-out under both agreements.

![A transparent cylinder containing a white sphere floats between two curved structures, each featuring a glowing teal line. This depicts institutional-grade RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and liquidity aggregation through a Prime RFQ for optimal block trade atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

## How Does the Close out Calculation Differ in Practice?

The practical steps for a non-defaulting party executing a close-out are fundamentally different under the two agreements. The 1992 ISDA presents a choice that dictates the subsequent process, whereas the 2002 ISDA mandates a single, albeit flexible, path.

Under the **1992 ISDA**, if “Market Quotation” is chosen:

- 
**Identify Reference Market-makers** ▴ The party must seek quotes from at least three leading dealers in the relevant market for a replacement transaction.

- 
**Solicit Quotes** ▴ Formal requests for quotations must be made as of the Early Termination Date.

- 
**Calculate Settlement Amount** ▴ The final amount is determined based on the average of the quotes received. If fewer than three quotes are obtained, this method often fails, and the party must revert to the “Loss” calculation.

If “Loss” is chosen under the 1992 ISDA, the process is less structured. The determining party calculates its total losses and costs, including the cost of replacing the economic equivalent of the terminated transactions. The key operational requirement is to act in good faith and produce a determination that is “reasonable,” which, as established, is a relatively low bar of rationality.

Under the **2002 ISDA**, the execution of the “Close-out Amount” calculation is a more sophisticated process:

- 
**Information Gathering** ▴ The determining party can use a wide array of information. This includes, but is not limited to, quotations from third parties (without the rigid requirement of three), relevant market data, information from internal sources, and proprietary valuation models.

- 
**Procedural Reasonableness** ▴ The party must follow a commercially reasonable process. This means the procedures used to gather information and perform the calculation must be sound, transparent, and justifiable to an objective observer. This could involve documenting the models used, the market data consulted, and the rationale for including or excluding certain information.

- 
**Substantive Reasonableness** ▴ The final calculated amount must also be commercially reasonable. The result itself must be defensible as a fair representation of the party’s economic loss under the prevailing market circumstances.

![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Operational Comparison of Default Scenarios

The operational response to a default event is also altered by the refined termination triggers in the 2002 agreement. The shorter grace periods require more vigilant monitoring of counterparty obligations to ensure that termination rights can be exercised promptly.

> A non-defaulting party under the 2002 ISDA must ensure its valuation process is not only internally consistent but also objectively defensible to a third party.

The following table breaks down the operational differences in a typical failure-to-pay default scenario.

| Operational Step | 1992 ISDA Execution | 2002 ISDA Execution |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grace Period for Failure to Pay | Three Local Business Days after notice is given. | One Local Business Day after notice is given. |
| Valuation Process Initiation | Select either “Market Quotation” or “Loss” and proceed according to the chosen method’s procedural rules. | Commence the “Close-out Amount” calculation, gathering a broad range of market information. |
| Documentation Standard | Documentation must support the chosen method (e.g. records of quote solicitations for Market Quotation). The standard for “Loss” is less defined. | Extensive documentation is required to prove both the reasonableness of the procedure and the result. This includes models, data sources, and internal deliberations. |
| Dispute Resolution Focus | Disputes often center on whether the choice of method was appropriate or if the “Loss” calculation was rational. | Disputes focus on whether the determining party’s actions meet the objective standard of commercial reasonableness. |

In essence, the execution of a close-out under the 2002 ISDA demands a more institutionalized and rigorous internal valuation infrastructure. Parties must be prepared to defend their methodology and its outcome with concrete evidence and a clear, documented rationale that would satisfy an objective third-party review. This places a greater burden on the non-defaulting party but ultimately leads to a more stable and predictable outcome for the market as a whole.

![A deconstructed spherical object, segmented into distinct horizontal layers, slightly offset, symbolizing the granular components of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. Each layer represents a liquidity pool or RFQ protocol, showcasing modular execution pathways and dynamic price discovery within a Prime RFQ architecture for high-fidelity execution and systemic risk mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/modular-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-framework-dissected-for-optimal-rfq-performance.jpg)

## References

- Charles Law PLLC. “The ISDA Master Agreement ▴ Part II ▴ Negotiated Provisions.” _Charles Law PLLC_, 2022.

- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. “ISDA Master Agreement Close-out Provisions ▴ English Courts Highlight a Difference Between the 1992 and 2002 Versions.” _Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP_, 4 May 2018.

- International Comparative Legal Guides. “Derivatives Laws and Regulations Close-out Under the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements 2025.” _ICLG.com_, 17 June 2025.

- The Association of Corporate Treasurers. “MASTER CLASS IN ISDA.” _The Association of Corporate Treasurers_.

- The Jolly Contrarian. “Close-out Amount – ISDA Provision.” _The Jolly Contrarian_, 14 August 2024.

![Visualizing a complex Institutional RFQ ecosystem, angular forms represent multi-leg spread execution pathways and dark liquidity integration. A sharp, precise point symbolizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, highlighting atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Reflection

The evolution from the 1992 to the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement is a case study in systemic adaptation. The framework was not merely updated; it was re-architected in response to observed failures. This prompts a critical examination of one’s own operational framework for counterparty risk. Does your internal valuation methodology possess the robustness and transparency to meet the “commercially reasonable” standard under pressure?

Is your process for monitoring counterparty health agile enough to leverage the tighter termination triggers? The knowledge of these agreements is a component, but the true strategic advantage lies in embedding this knowledge into a dynamic and defensible operational system that is prepared for market stress.

![A metallic disc intersected by a dark bar, over a teal circuit board. This visualizes Institutional Liquidity Pool access via RFQ Protocol, enabling Block Trade Execution of Digital Asset Options with High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-principal-operational-framework-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, reflective surface features a segmented circular mechanism, reminiscent of an RFQ aggregation engine or liquidity pool. Specks suggest market microstructure dynamics or data latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-options-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## 2002 Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement represents a standardized bilateral contractual framework for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

## Market Quotation

Meaning ▴ A market quotation represents the current executable bid and ask prices for a specific financial instrument, typically accompanied by the corresponding tradable sizes or market depth at various price levels. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Three interconnected units depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing blue layer signifies real-time RFQ execution and liquidity aggregation, ensuring high-fidelity execution across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-os.jpg)

## Non-Defaulting Party

Meaning ▴ The Non-Defaulting Party designates the entity within a bilateral or multilateral contractual agreement, particularly in digital asset derivatives, that remains in full compliance with its obligations and terms when a counterparty fails to meet its own, thereby triggering a default event. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Close-Out Amount

Meaning ▴ The Close-Out Amount represents the definitive financial value required to terminate a derivatives contract or position, typically calculated upon a default event or a pre-defined termination trigger. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

## 2002 Isda

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement constitutes a standardized contractual framework, widely adopted within the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market, establishing foundational terms for bilateral derivatives transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An Institutional Grade RFQ Engine core for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer ensures High-Fidelity Execution, driving Optimal Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement for Aggregated Inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Commercially Reasonable

Meaning ▴ Commercially Reasonable refers to actions, terms, or conditions that a prudent party would undertake or accept in a similar business context, aiming to achieve a desired outcome efficiently and effectively while considering prevailing market conditions, industry practices, and available alternatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/determining-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## Determining Party

Meaning ▴ The Determining Party is the designated entity, system component, or algorithmic agent possessing the final and binding authority to initiate, validate, or conclude a specific event, transaction, or state transition within a defined operational framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract image visualizes a central Crypto Derivatives OS hub, precisely managing institutional trading workflows. Sharp, intersecting planes represent RFQ protocols extending to liquidity pools for options trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The ISDA Master Agreement is a standardized contractual framework for privately negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions, establishing common terms for a wide array of financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-netting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

## Close-Out Netting

Meaning ▴ Close-out netting is a contractual mechanism within financial agreements, typically master agreements, designed to consolidate all mutual obligations between two counterparties into a single net payment upon the occurrence of a specified termination event, such as default or insolvency. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/1992-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated system's core component, representing an Execution Management System, drives a precise, luminous RFQ protocol beam. This beam navigates between balanced spheres symbolizing counterparties and intricate market microstructure, facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, optimizing price discovery, and ensuring high-fidelity execution within a prime brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-10.jpg)

## 1992 Isda

Meaning ▴ The 1992 ISDA Master Agreement represents a standardized contractual framework for privately negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions between two counterparties. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-data/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Symmetrical teal and beige structural elements intersect centrally, depicting an institutional RFQ hub for digital asset derivatives. This abstract composition represents algorithmic execution of multi-leg options, optimizing liquidity aggregation, price discovery, and capital efficiency for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-for-multi-leg-options-execution.jpg)

## Market Data

Meaning ▴ Market Data comprises the real-time or historical pricing and trading information for financial instruments, encompassing bid and ask quotes, last trade prices, cumulative volume, and order book depth. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/specified-transaction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A focused view of a robust, beige cylindrical component with a dark blue internal aperture, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution channel. This element represents the core of an RFQ protocol system, enabling bespoke liquidity for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, minimizing slippage and information leakage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-precision-component.jpg)

## Specified Transaction

Meaning ▴ A Specified Transaction represents a pre-defined, pre-authorized, and often automated sequence of operations designed for executing a financial instrument trade or data exchange under precise conditions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust metallic framework supports a teal half-sphere, symbolizing an institutional grade digital asset derivative or block trade processed within a Prime RFQ environment. This abstract view highlights the intricate market microstructure and high-fidelity execution of an RFQ protocol, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage through precise system interaction](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Counterparty Risk

Meaning ▴ Counterparty risk denotes the potential for financial loss stemming from a counterparty's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations in a transaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizes the core mechanism of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, highlighting its market microstructure precision. Metallic components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and block trade processing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-1.jpg)

## Force Majeure

Meaning ▴ Force Majeure designates a contractual clause excusing parties from fulfilling their obligations due to extraordinary events beyond their reasonable control, such as natural disasters, acts of war, or government prohibitions, which render performance impossible or commercially impracticable. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, modular system component in beige and dark blue, featuring precise ports and a vibrant teal indicator. This embodies Prime RFQ architecture enabling high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives through bilateral RFQ protocols, ensuring low-latency interconnects, private quotation, institutional-grade liquidity, and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-system-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Set-Off Provision

Meaning ▴ A Set-Off Provision constitutes a contractual or statutory right allowing a party to net mutual debts or claims owed to and by another party, thereby reducing the aggregate gross exposure to a single net amount. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-prime-brokerage-agreement-and-an-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

## Master Agreement

A Prime Brokerage Agreement is a centralized service contract; an ISDA Master Agreement is a standardized bilateral derivatives protocol. </a>

**Tags:** [Set-Off Provision](https://options.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/), [Determining Party](https://options.greeks.live/area/determining-party/), [Termination Events](https://options.greeks.live/area/termination-events/), [Force Majeure](https://options.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/), [Force Majeure Event](https://options.greeks.live/area/force-majeure-event/), [Market Quotation](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA Standard Affect the Likelihood of Legal Disputes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-standard-affect-the-likelihood-of-legal-disputes/)
![A central metallic lens with glowing green concentric circles, flanked by curved grey shapes, embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure, central to a principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-view.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement reduces legal disputes by systemizing counterparty obligations within a single, enforceable framework.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between the 1992 Isda’s Loss Method and the 2002 Close-Out Amount?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-the-1992-isdas-loss-method-and-the-2002-close-out-amount/)
![Abstract dual-cone object reflects RFQ Protocol dynamism. It signifies robust Liquidity Aggregation, High-Fidelity Execution, and Principal-to-Principal negotiation. Essential for Crypto Derivatives OS Block Trades, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Volatility Surface integrity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-execution-framework-for-digital-asset-derivatives-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

The 2002 Close-Out Amount replaces the 1992's subjective Loss calculation with an objective, dual-standard of commercial reasonableness.

- 
### [In What Ways Does the 2002 ISDA More Effectively Reduce Legal Risk during a Counterparty Default?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-does-the-2002-isda-more-effectively-reduce-legal-risk-during-a-counterparty-default/)
![A curved grey surface anchors a translucent blue disk, pierced by a sharp green financial instrument and two silver stylus elements. This visualizes a precise RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure via a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-optimizing-market-microstructure-and-price-discovery.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA reduces legal risk via an objective "Close-out Amount" standard, ensuring a more predictable and defensible default process.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement Differ from the 1992 Version in a Default Scenario?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-master-agreement-differ-from-the-1992-version-in-a-default-scenario/)
![Precisely engineered metallic components, including a central pivot, symbolize the market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. This mechanism embodies RFQ protocols facilitating high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and optimal price discovery for crypto options.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement replaces the 1992 version's elective default mechanisms with a unified, commercially reasonable Close-Out Amount.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement Differ from the 1992 Version regarding Close-Out Calculations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-master-agreement-differ-from-the-1992-version-regarding-close-out-calculations/)
![A sleek, multi-layered digital asset derivatives platform highlights a teal sphere, symbolizing a core liquidity pool or atomic settlement node. The perforated white interface represents an RFQ protocol's aggregated inquiry points for multi-leg spread execution, reflecting precise market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-execution-system.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement replaces the 1992's rigid/subjective methods with a single, objective standard of commercial reasonableness.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Close-Out Protocols?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-close-out-protocols/)
![A segmented circular structure depicts an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. Distinct dark and light quadrants illustrate liquidity segmentation and dark pool integration. A central element signifies atomic settlement and price discovery within an RFQ protocol, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-protocols.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA protocol mandates a single, objective "Close-out Amount," replacing the 1992 version's subjective and varied options.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Close-Out Provisions?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-close-out-provisions/)
![A refined object featuring a translucent teal element, symbolizing a dynamic RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precision embodies High-Fidelity Execution and seamless Price Discovery within complex Market Microstructure. The reflective surface suggests deep Liquidity Pool access for Block Trade and Private Quotation protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-for-optimal-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA replaces subjective valuation with an objective "commercially reasonable" standard for a single "Close-out Amount."

- 
### [How Does the 2002 Isda Master Agreement Enhance Counterparty Risk Management?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-master-agreement-enhance-counterparty-risk-management/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency. A metallic button suggests precise private quotation control.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement is a legal operating system that mitigates counterparty risk via netting, default triggers, and collateralization.

- 
### [How Does the Close-Out Amount Calculation Differ from the 1992 Loss and Market Quotation Methods?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-the-1992-loss-and-market-quotation-methods/)
![A sleek, spherical intelligence layer component with internal blue mechanics and a precision lens. It embodies a Principal's private quotation system, driving high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives through RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and minimizing latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-private-quotation-system-intelligence-layer-component.jpg)

The Close-Out Amount is a flexible, evidence-based valuation, while Loss is a subjective indemnity and Market Quotation is a rigid, quote-driven process.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Difference between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Master Agreement Close out Standards?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreement-close-out-standards/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreement-close-out-standards/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Difference between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Master Agreement Close out Standards? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The 2002 ISDA replaces the 1992 version's rigid close-out options with a flexible, yet more rigorous, \"Close-out Amount\" standard. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreement-close-out-standards/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-02T09:11:10+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-02T09:11:10+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-options.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, featuring a sleek control panel displaying real-time market microstructure and multi-leg spread execution data. A prominent transparent sphere symbolizes RFQ protocol private quotation, advanced price discovery, and dynamic implied volatility visualization. This high-fidelity execution environment ensures capital efficiency, ultra-low latency, and robust systemic risk management for complex options trading and aggregated inquiry."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "1992 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Close-Out Amount",
        "Close-Out Netting",
        "Commercially Reasonable",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Determining Party",
        "Events of Default",
        "Force Majeure",
        "Force Majeure Event",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Market Data",
        "Market Quotation",
        "Non-Defaulting Party",
        "Set-Off Provision",
        "Specified Transaction",
        "Termination Events"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Was The Strategic Flaw In The 1992 Valuation Options?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The dual-option valuation system in the 1992 ISDA presented a strategic dilemma for the non-defaulting party. The \"Market Quotation\" method, while appearing objective, was operationally fragile. In a crisis, the very reference points it relied upon\u2014readily available quotes from major dealers\u2014could evaporate. This forced parties toward the \"Loss\" calculation. The \"Loss\" method, however, gave the determining party considerable discretion, which could be perceived as a license to make a self-serving valuation. This ambiguity created a high potential for protracted and costly legal challenges, undermining the goal of a swift and final settlement following a default. The 2002 ISDA's \"Close-out Amount\" was designed to resolve this dilemma by providing a single methodology that blends the objectivity of market data with the flexibility needed to operate in distressed markets."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does The Close Out Calculation Differ In Practice?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The practical steps for a non-defaulting party executing a close-out are fundamentally different under the two agreements. The 1992 ISDA presents a choice that dictates the subsequent process, whereas the 2002 ISDA mandates a single, albeit flexible, path."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-master-agreement-close-out-standards/
