# What Is the Ideal Weighting Percentage for Cost in a Technology Procurement Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Precision-engineered modular components, with teal accents, align at a central interface. This visually embodies an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating principal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-interface-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![A sleek, multi-component mechanism features a light upper segment meeting a darker, textured lower part. A diagonal bar pivots on a circular sensor, signifying High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ Protocols for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-with-prime-os-integration.jpg)

## Concept

The inquiry into the ideal weighting for cost within a [technology procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) RFP is fundamentally a question of organizational philosophy, translated into a quantitative framework. It presupposes the existence of a single, universally applicable percentage that can balance the immediate appeal of low upfront expenditure against the long-term, systemic impact of a technology acquisition. However, the core of a robust procurement system lies in the understanding that the “ideal” weight is not a static number to be discovered, but a dynamic variable to be engineered. It is the output of a rigorous, context-sensitive process, not a predetermined input.

Viewing the [cost weighting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cost-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) as a control lever on a complex piece of machinery provides a more accurate mental model. Setting it too high prioritizes short-term fiscal metrics, often at the expense of operational efficiency, user adoption, and future scalability. This approach can inadvertently introduce significant, albeit hidden, long-term costs related to technical debt, integration failures, and vendor instability.

Conversely, setting the cost weighting too low can lead to the acquisition of overly expensive, feature-rich systems that exceed genuine operational requirements, representing a misallocation of capital. The objective is to calibrate this lever with precision for each specific procurement event.

> A procurement’s success is measured not by the savings at purchase, but by the value generated over the system’s entire lifecycle.

This calibration process moves the focus from “what is the right number?” to “what is our methodology for determining the right number?” It requires a systemic perspective where the technology is not merely a commodity but a component being integrated into a larger operational architecture. The weighting assigned to cost, therefore, becomes a direct reflection of the procurement’s strategic importance, the organization’s risk tolerance, and the anticipated [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO) over the asset’s lifecycle. A mature procurement function recognizes that price is just one data point in a complex value equation. 

![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

![A sleek, disc-shaped system, with concentric rings and a central dome, visually represents an advanced Principal's operational framework. It integrates RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and real-time risk management](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

![Sleek, interconnected metallic components with glowing blue accents depict a sophisticated institutional trading platform. A central element and button signify high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## The Necessary Shift to Total Cost of Ownership

A strategic procurement framework begins by expanding the definition of “cost” beyond the initial purchase price. The [Total Cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of Ownership (TCO) model provides a more complete financial picture, encompassing all direct and indirect costs associated with a technology asset throughout its operational life. This includes implementation and integration fees, data migration, user training, ongoing maintenance and support subscriptions, necessary hardware upgrades, and eventual decommissioning or replacement costs. By committing to a TCO analysis, an organization forces a more disciplined and forward-looking evaluation, preventing the seductive simplicity of a low bid from obscuring the true long-term financial impact. 

Adopting a TCO mindset is the foundational step in developing a defensible weighting strategy. It provides the financial language to justify a potentially higher upfront investment that yields greater long-term value. This requires collaboration between procurement, IT, finance, and the end-user business units to map out the full lifecycle cost implications of each proposal, transforming the evaluation from a simple price comparison into a sophisticated financial forecast.

![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

## Selecting the Appropriate Valuation Framework

With a TCO perspective established, the next strategic layer involves selecting the appropriate procurement model. These models exist on a spectrum, each suited to different types of acquisitions. Understanding where a particular technology procurement fits on this spectrum is essential for setting a logical cost weighting.

![Intricate metallic components signify system precision engineering. These structured elements symbolize institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-engineering-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-latency-optimization.jpg)

## From Price-Driven to Value-Focused Models

At one end lies the **[Lowest Price Technically Acceptable](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lowest-price-technically-acceptable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([LPTA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lpta/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite))** model. In this framework, proposals are first screened to ensure they meet a predefined set of minimum technical and functional requirements. Of those that pass this gateway, the contract is awarded to the lowest bidder.

This model is appropriate only for highly commoditized technologies where the risk of performance variation between vendors is negligible. For such procurements, the cost weighting is effectively 100% among the technically qualified bidders.

At the other end of the spectrum is the **[Best Value](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** model. This approach seeks the most advantageous balance of price, quality, and performance. It acknowledges that a higher initial price may be justified by superior functionality, greater reliability, lower lifecycle costs, or reduced risk. This is the dominant model for strategic technology procurement, as it allows for a nuanced trade-off analysis.

Within this model, the cost weighting is a critical variable that must be carefully calibrated. A procurement for a mission-critical system might assign cost a weight of only 20-40%, while a less critical system might see cost weighted at 40-60%.

![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with a central pivoting component and parallel structural elements, indicative of a precision engineered RFQ engine. Polished surfaces and visible fasteners suggest robust algorithmic trading infrastructure for high-fidelity execution and latency optimization](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-mechanism-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Table of Procurement Model Characteristics

The choice of model dictates the strategic importance of the cost component in the evaluation. The following table illustrates the relationship between procurement complexity and the chosen valuation framework.

| Framework | Primary Focus | Typical Technology | Implied Cost Weighting | Risk Profile |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) | Compliance with minimum specs at the lowest price | Standardized hardware, basic software licenses | 100% (after technical pass) | Low (assuming specs are comprehensive) |
| Best Value (Cost as a major factor) | Balance of cost and technical merit | Departmental software, standard enterprise systems | 40-60% | Moderate |
| Best Value (Technical as a major factor) | Performance, innovation, and strategic fit | Core enterprise platforms, R&D systems | 20-40% | High (focus on mitigating performance risk) |
| Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS) | Vendor expertise and approach | Specialized consulting, custom development | 0% (in initial selection) | High (focus on mitigating execution risk) |

![Sleek, metallic components with reflective blue surfaces depict an advanced institutional RFQ protocol. Its central pivot and radiating arms symbolize aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution, optimizing order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Structuring the Evaluation Criteria

The final strategic component is the deconstruction of “quality” into a set of discrete, measurable evaluation criteria. These non-cost factors form the counterweight to the price score. They must be defined with clarity and precision to ensure the evaluation committee can score proposals consistently and defensibly. 

- **Technical and Functional Fit** ▴ This criterion assesses how well the proposed solution meets the detailed requirements outlined in the RFP. It includes everything from core features to user interface design and reporting capabilities.

- **[Vendor Viability](https://prime.greeks.live/question/in-procuring-a-complex-saas-platform-how-should-an-rfp-balance-technical-requirements-with-vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and Support** ▴ This evaluates the long-term stability of the vendor. It considers financial health, market reputation, client references, and the quality and availability of their customer support and service level agreements (SLAs).

- **Implementation and Integration** ▴ This assesses the vendor’s proposed plan for deploying the system and integrating it with the existing technology stack. It looks at the methodology, timeline, required resources, and the vendor’s experience with similar integrations.

- **Scalability and Innovation** ▴ This forward-looking criterion evaluates the solution’s ability to grow with the organization and the vendor’s product roadmap. It assesses the underlying architecture and the vendor’s commitment to future development.

![Stacked modular components with a sharp fin embody Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives. This represents High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, enabling Price Discovery, optimizing Capital Efficiency, and managing Gamma Exposure within an Institutional Prime RFQ for Block Trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-system-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization.jpg)

![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase translates strategy into a rigorous, documented, and defensible procurement decision. This is where the abstract concept of “best value” is given a precise, quantitative form. The process ensures that the final selection is the logical outcome of a predefined system, insulating the decision from bias and providing a clear audit trail.

![A polished, dark spherical component anchors a sophisticated system architecture, flanked by a precise green data bus. This represents a high-fidelity execution engine, enabling institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook a Framework for Weighting Determination

A disciplined, step-by-step process is required to move from strategic goals to a specific cost weighting. This playbook ensures all critical factors are considered and the final weighting is a deliberate and justifiable choice.

- **Convene a Cross-Functional Team** ▴ The evaluation committee should include representatives from procurement, IT, finance, and the primary business unit(s) that will use the technology. This ensures all perspectives are incorporated into the requirements and evaluation criteria.

- **Categorize the Procurement** ▴ Before writing the RFP, the team must classify the procurement’s strategic importance. Is it a mission-critical system (e.g. ERP, core banking platform) or a supporting application (e.g. departmental productivity tool)? This classification is the first step in determining the appropriate emphasis on cost.

- **Define and Prioritize Non-Cost Criteria** ▴ The team must brainstorm and define all the qualitative factors that will deliver value. This includes technical performance, vendor stability, support quality, ease of use, and scalability. These should then be grouped and prioritized based on their importance to the project’s success.

- **Develop a Detailed Scoring Rubric** ▴ For each non-cost criterion, a scoring rubric must be developed. For example, for “Customer Support,” a score of 1 might mean “Email support only, 48-hour response,” while a score of 5 means “24/7 phone support with a dedicated account manager and 2-hour critical response SLA.” This converts subjective assessments into objective scores.

- **Assign Preliminary Weights** ▴ Based on the procurement’s strategic importance, assign a preliminary weight to each major criterion, including cost. For a mission-critical system, the breakdown might be ▴ [Technical Fit](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (40%), Vendor Viability (20%), Implementation Plan (10%), and Cost (30%). For a less critical system, it might be ▴ Technical Fit (30%), Vendor Viability (15%), Implementation Plan (5%), and Cost (50%).

- **Conduct Sensitivity Analysis** ▴ Model how the final rankings would change if the weights were adjusted. What if cost were 10% higher or lower? This stress test reveals how sensitive the outcome is to the initial weighting assumptions and builds confidence in the final chosen structure.

- **Finalize and Document** ▴ Once the weights are finalized through analysis and consensus, they must be documented along with the rationale for their selection. This documentation is critical for transparency and for defending the procurement decision if challenged.

![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The heart of the execution phase is the [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This is the mechanism that translates the evaluation committee’s assessments into a final ranking. The model ensures that all proposals are judged by the exact same standards, with the weights determining the relative importance of each criterion.

> The scoring model transforms subjective evaluation into a structured, objective, and auditable decision-making process.

The following table provides a detailed example of a scoring model for a hypothetical procurement of a new CRM system. In this scenario, the procurement has been classified as strategically important, leading to a cost weighting of 30%.

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Max Score | Vendor A Raw Score | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Raw Score | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical/Functional Fit | 40% | 100 | 90 | 36.0 | 75 | 30.0 |
| Vendor Viability & Support | 20% | 100 | 85 | 17.0 | 95 | 19.0 |
| Implementation & Integration | 10% | 100 | 80 | 8.0 | 70 | 7.0 |
| Total Non-Cost Score | 70% | – | – | 61.0 | – | 56.0 |
| Total Cost of Ownership (5-Year) | – | – | $1,200,000 | – | $950,000 | – |
| Vendor A Cost Score | – | – | – | 23.75 | – | – |
| Vendor B Cost Score | – | – | – | – | – | 30.00 |
| Final Score | 100% | – | – | 84.75 | – | 86.00 |

In this model, Vendor A presents a superior technical solution, which is reflected in its high non-cost score. However, Vendor B’s significantly lower Total Cost of Ownership allows it to achieve the maximum possible score for the cost component. The final result is a very close competition, with Vendor B emerging as the winner. This demonstrates the power of the weighting system.

Had the cost weight been set at 20%, Vendor A would have won. If it had been set at 40%, Vendor B’s victory would have been more decisive. This underscores the critical importance of setting the weights as a deliberate strategic act before the proposals are opened.

![Precisely engineered circular beige, grey, and blue modules stack tilted on a dark base. A central aperture signifies the core RFQ protocol engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-prime-os-rfq-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-execution.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

To fully grasp the systemic impact of cost weighting, consider the narrative of a mid-sized manufacturing firm, “MechanoCorp,” procuring a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system ▴ the digital backbone of their entire operation. The board, facing pressure on quarterly earnings, mandates that the procurement team prioritize fiscal prudence. The RFP committee, influenced by this top-down pressure, establishes an evaluation model where cost is assigned a dominant weight of 55%. The remaining 45% is distributed among technical fit, vendor support, and implementation plan.

Two finalists emerge. “AlphaSystem” is a market-leading, tier-one ERP provider with a robust, scalable platform and a long track record of successful implementations in the manufacturing sector. Their five-year TCO is calculated at $4.5 million. “BetaSoft” is a newer, more aggressive player, offering a seemingly comparable feature set but with a much less extensive client portfolio.

Their TCO is a compelling $3.2 million. The scoring model, heavily skewed toward cost, runs its course. Despite AlphaSystem scoring significantly higher on the technical and vendor viability sections, BetaSoft’s massive price advantage gives it a decisive victory. The contract is signed, and the board congratulates the procurement team on securing a $1.3 million saving.

The initial months of the implementation appear to validate the decision. The first few software modules are deployed on schedule. However, friction begins to surface during the critical manufacturing and supply chain integration phase. The BetaSoft system, designed as a more generic, one-size-fits-all solution, requires extensive customization to handle MechanoCorp’s specialized production workflows.

The initial implementation budget, based on BetaSoft’s optimistic projections, proves wholly inadequate. An additional $500,000 in professional services fees is required to write the necessary custom code.

As the system goes live, the problems compound. The user interface is less intuitive than AlphaSystem’s, leading to slow adoption and a spike in user errors. The data migration from the legacy system was incomplete, corrupting inventory records and causing production stoppages. The support team at BetaSoft, smaller and less experienced than AlphaSystem’s, is overwhelmed.

Critical support tickets languish for days. MechanoCorp is forced to hire two additional IT staff members just to manage the new ERP’s issues, adding $200,000 in annual salary costs. Within two years, the “savings” have been entirely consumed by unforeseen expenses. The TCO is now on par with AlphaSystem’s original bid, but MechanoCorp is saddled with an inferior, unstable system that hampers its operational efficiency. By year three, the executive team makes the painful decision to begin searching for a replacement system, having not only wasted millions of dollars but also lost three years of potential growth and innovation.

Now, rewind the scenario. Imagine the RFP committee had categorized the ERP system as mission-critical from the outset. They build a consensus that system stability, vendor expertise, and long-term scalability are paramount to the company’s future. They engineer a scoring model that reflects this strategy, assigning cost a weight of only 30%, with Technical Fit (40%) and Vendor Viability (20%) taking precedence.

In this reality, the scoring model correctly identifies AlphaSystem as the best value provider, despite its higher price. The board, having been briefed on the rationale behind the weighting, approves the higher upfront investment. The implementation is smoother, user adoption is high, and the system becomes a stable platform for growth. The higher initial cost is repaid through operational efficiency, reduced risk, and the avoidance of the catastrophic failure that defined the first scenario. This narrative illustrates that the cost weighting in an RFP is not an administrative detail; it is the mathematical expression of an organization’s strategic foresight.

![Intersecting metallic components symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol framework. This system enables High-Fidelity Execution and Atomic Settlement for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-specialists.jpg)

## References

- Nagle, James F. _A History of Government Contracting_. The George Washington University Law School, 1992.

- National Institute of Governmental Procurement (NIGP). “Best Value in Government Procurement.” NIGP Position Paper.

- New Mexico General Services Department. “Best Value Procurement Guide ▴ Part 2.” State Purchasing Division.

- Commonwealth of Massachusetts. “Guidelines for Ensuring Best Value Procurement.” Operational Services Division.

- Pegnato, Joseph A. “Assessing Federal Procurement reform ▴ Has the Procurement Pendulum Stopped Swinging?” In _International Handbook of Public Procurement_, edited by Khi V. Thai, CRC Press, 2009.

- Number Analytics. “Best Value Procurement ▴ A Comprehensive Guide.” 2024.

- Schapper, P. R. & Veiga Malta, J. N. (2005). “A synoptic review of public procurement.” _Journal of Public Procurement_, 5(2), 147-177.

- Thai, K. V. (2001). “Public procurement re-examined.” _Journal of Public Procurement_, 1(1), 9-50.

![Precision-engineered multi-vane system with opaque, reflective, and translucent teal blades. This visualizes Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure, driving High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing Liquidity Pool aggregation, and Multi-Leg Spread management on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-multi-vane-system-illustrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

![A macro view of a precision-engineered metallic component, representing the robust core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ. Its intricate Market Microstructure design facilitates Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ Protocols, enabling High-Fidelity Execution and Algorithmic Trading for Block Trades, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-core-system-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-and-advanced-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## From a Fixed Answer to a Dynamic System

The journey through the mechanics of cost weighting reveals a fundamental truth ▴ the pursuit of a single, ideal percentage is a diversion from the real task. The objective is to construct a resilient, intelligent, and adaptable procurement system. Such a system does not rely on a magic number but on a robust methodology. It is a system that forces difficult conversations, demands cross-functional alignment, and requires a clear-eyed assessment of risk and long-term value.

The framework and models discussed are the components of this system. They are tools for thinking, designed to structure debate and channel organizational intelligence toward a defensible conclusion. The true value lies not in any specific weighting that comes out of the process, but in the institutional capability to execute the process itself, time and again, with rigor and strategic clarity.

Building this capability is the real investment. It transforms the procurement function from a cost center focused on tactical savings into a strategic enabler that acquires the foundational technologies for future growth.

![A sleek, spherical, off-white device with a glowing cyan lens symbolizes an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer. It drives High-Fidelity Execution of Digital Asset Derivatives via RFQ Protocols, enabling Optimal Liquidity Aggregation and Price Discovery for Market Microstructure Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic module with a dark, reflective sphere sits atop a cylindrical base, symbolizing an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This system processes aggregated inquiries for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads while managing gamma exposure and slippage within dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Technology Procurement

Meaning ▴ Technology Procurement, within the context of crypto institutional investing and trading, is the strategic process of acquiring the necessary hardware, software, infrastructure, and services required to build, operate, and maintain robust digital asset trading platforms and related systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cost-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two precision-engineered nodes, possibly representing a Private Quotation or RFQ mechanism, connect via a transparent conduit against a striped Market Microstructure backdrop. This visualizes High-Fidelity Execution pathways for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within a Dark Pool environment, optimizing Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-nodes.jpg)

## Cost Weighting

Meaning ▴ Cost weighting involves assigning relative importance or value to various cost components within a financial analysis or decision-making process. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision metallic dial on a multi-layered interface embodies an institutional RFQ engine. The translucent panel suggests an intelligence layer for real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency for block trades within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A smooth, off-white sphere rests within a meticulously engineered digital asset derivatives RFQ platform, featuring distinct teal and dark blue metallic components. This sophisticated market microstructure enables private quotation, high-fidelity execution, and optimized price discovery for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-microstructure-core.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost represents the aggregated sum of all expenditures incurred in a specific process, project, or acquisition, encompassing both direct and indirect financial outlays. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lowest-price-technically-acceptable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise metallic and transparent teal mechanism symbolizes the intricate market microstructure of a Prime RFQ. It facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocols for private quotation, aggregated inquiry, and block trade management, ensuring best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-principal-trading-systems-driving-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocols.jpg)

## Lowest Price Technically Acceptable

Meaning ▴ Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) is a procurement evaluation methodology where bids are first assessed for technical acceptability against predefined requirements, and among those deemed acceptable, the contract is awarded to the offeror proposing the lowest price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lpta/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic mechanism with a luminous blue sphere at its core represents a Liquidity Pool within a Crypto Derivatives OS. Surrounding rings symbolize intricate Market Microstructure, facilitating RFQ Protocol and High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-mechanism.jpg)

## Lpta

Meaning ▴ LPTA, an acronym for Lowest Price Technically Acceptable, is a procurement evaluation methodology where bids are first assessed for technical acceptability against predefined criteria, and among all technically compliant proposals, the contract is awarded to the offeror submitting the lowest price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, precision-engineered module with raised circular elements integrates with a smooth beige housing. It signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols, ensuring robust price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-system-core-high-speed-price-discovery-module.jpg)

## Best Value

Meaning ▴ Best Value, in the context of crypto trading and institutional Request for Quote (RFQ) processes, represents the optimal combination of execution price, speed, certainty of fill, and overall transaction cost for an order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/in-procuring-a-complex-saas-platform-how-should-an-rfp-balance-technical-requirements-with-vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered apparatus with a luminous green beam, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It facilitates high-fidelity execution via optimized RFQ protocols, ensuring precise price discovery and mitigating counterparty risk within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Vendor Viability

A successful SaaS RFP architects a symbiotic relationship where technical efficacy is sustained by verifiable vendor stability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Technical Fit

Meaning ▴ Technical Fit denotes the degree to which a proposed or existing technology solution, protocol, or system component aligns with an organization's specific technical requirements, infrastructure, and operational environment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Brushed metallic and colored modular components represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. The precise engineering signifies high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency within a sophisticated market microstructure for multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a>

**Tags:** [LPTA](https://options.greeks.live/area/lpta/), [Best Value](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-value/), [Technology Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/technology-procurement/), [Non-Cost Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-cost-evaluation-criteria/), [Cost-Benefit Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/cost-benefit-analysis/), [Best Value Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-value-procurement/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does a Weighted Scoring Model Improve the Objectivity of a Value-Driven Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-model-improve-the-objectivity-of-a-value-driven-rfp-evaluation/)
![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

A weighted scoring model improves RFP objectivity by translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible evaluation framework.

- 
### [What Is the Best Practice for Weighting Price versus Technical Merit in an RFP Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-practice-for-weighting-price-versus-technical-merit-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

A best practice balances price and merit through a weighted, transparent framework that quantifies strategic value beyond initial cost.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Create an Effective Scoring Model for Evaluating Rfp Responses?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-create-an-effective-scoring-model-for-evaluating-rfp-responses/)
![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement. This intelligence layer optimizes price discovery, managing portfolio margin and ensuring best execution in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

An effective RFP scoring model is a system that translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible selection framework.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks of Using a Heavily Cost-Weighted Rfp Model for Complex Services?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-of-using-a-heavily-cost-weighted-rfp-model-for-complex-services/)
![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

A heavily cost-weighted RFP for complex services risks procuring a low-quality, inflexible solution that ultimately incurs higher total costs.

- 
### [How Should the RFP Evaluation Process Evolve When Corporate Strategy Shifts from Growth to Profitability?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-rfp-evaluation-process-evolve-when-corporate-strategy-shifts-from-growth-to-profitability/)
![Metallic platter signifies core market infrastructure. A precise blue instrument, representing RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, targets a green block, signifying a large block trade. This illustrates high-fidelity execution, market microstructure, and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-market-microstructure-optimization-for-alpha-generation.jpg)

The RFP process evolves from a feature-based procurement tool to a strategic financial instrument for maximizing ROI and TCO.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Price in a Complex Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-price-in-a-complex-rfp-scoring-model/)
![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

The optimal price weight in an RFP model is the calculated output of a strategic process that quantifies long-term value over initial cost.

- 
### [What Is the Role of Sensitivity Analysis in Validating a TCO Model during the RFP Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-sensitivity-analysis-in-validating-a-tco-model-during-the-rfp-process/)
![A sphere split into light and dark segments, revealing a luminous core. This encapsulates the precise Request for Quote RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, highlighting high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and advanced market microstructure within aggregated liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

Sensitivity analysis validates a TCO model by stress-testing its core assumptions, revealing the financial risk inherent in each RFP response.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Evaluation Criteria between a Strategic Partnership RFP and a Commodity RFQ?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-evaluation-criteria-between-a-strategic-partnership-rfp-and-a-commodity-rfq/)
![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

A commodity RFQ's evaluation is a price-based calculation; a strategic RFP's evaluation is a value-based judgment on future potential.

- 
### [How Do You Align Rfp Evaluation Criteria with Evolving Corporate Strategic Goals over Time?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-align-rfp-evaluation-criteria-with-evolving-corporate-strategic-goals-over-time/)
![A sleek, conical precision instrument, with a vibrant mint-green tip and a robust grey base, represents the cutting-edge of institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its sharp point signifies price discovery and best execution within complex market microstructure, powered by RFQ protocols for dark liquidity access and capital efficiency in atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-price-discovery-optimization-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

Aligning RFP criteria to corporate goals transforms procurement from a cost function into a system for executing strategy.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Ideal Weighting Percentage for Cost in a Technology Procurement Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-weighting-percentage-for-cost-in-a-technology-procurement-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-weighting-percentage-for-cost-in-a-technology-procurement-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Ideal Weighting Percentage for Cost in a Technology Procurement Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The ideal cost weighting is not a fixed number, but the engineered output of a strategic system balancing TCO, risk, and value. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-weighting-percentage-for-cost-in-a-technology-procurement-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T22:06:45+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T21:29:14+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-with-prime-os-integration.jpg",
        "caption": "A precision-engineered system component, with distinct textures and alignment, embodies advanced Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives. A diagonal element, potentially a Multi-Leg Spread or Price Feed, is anchored by a sensor, underscoring High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols. This represents a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Best Execution, mitigating Slippage, and enabling Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within a Prime RFQ for Institutional Grade trading."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best Value",
        "Best Value Procurement",
        "Cost Weighting",
        "Cost-Benefit Analysis",
        "Lowest Price Technically Acceptable",
        "LPTA",
        "Non-Cost Evaluation Criteria",
        "Procurement Risk Management",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Technical Fit",
        "Technology Procurement",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Evaluation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-weighting-percentage-for-cost-in-a-technology-procurement-rfp/
