# What Is the Importance of the Consistency Ratio in the AHP Method for RFP Evaluation? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A polished, cut-open sphere reveals a sharp, luminous green prism, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework. The reflective interior denotes market microstructure insights and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-alpha-intelligence.jpg)

![An Institutional Grade RFQ Engine core for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer ensures High-Fidelity Execution, driving Optimal Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement for Aggregated Inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Concept

The [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP) provides a structured framework for complex decision-making, breaking down a problem into a hierarchy of criteria and alternatives. Within this sophisticated system, the [Consistency Ratio](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CR) functions as the central nervous system, a critical measure that validates the integrity of the entire evaluation. Its importance in Request for Proposal (RFP) evaluation is absolute. The CR is a mathematical expression of the rationality of the judgments made during the process.

An [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) involves comparing multiple vendors across diverse, often conflicting, criteria, from technical specifications and implementation timelines to cost and ongoing support. Human judgments in such complex scenarios can be prone to contradictions. For instance, a committee might state that Vendor A is strongly preferable to Vendor B, and Vendor B is moderately preferable to Vendor C, but then state that Vendor C is preferable to Vendor A. Such a transitive flaw undermines the logical foundation of the decision. The Consistency Ratio is designed specifically to detect these kinds of logical failures.

It quantifies the degree of inconsistency in the [pairwise comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) judgments that form the core of the AHP method. Without this vital check, the resulting weights and priorities assigned to vendors would be based on flawed, contradictory logic, rendering the final decision arbitrary and indefensible.

> The Consistency Ratio serves as the mathematical guarantor of logical integrity within the Analytic Hierarchy Process, ensuring that RFP evaluation outcomes are rational and defensible.

The fundamental role of the CR is to provide a clear, numerical threshold for acceptable logical coherence. Developed by Thomas L. Saaty, the creator of AHP, the widely accepted rule is that the CR should be 0.10 or less. A value above this threshold indicates that the judgments are too random and inconsistent to be statistically reliable. This figure was not arbitrarily chosen; it is derived by comparing the inconsistency of the evaluator’s specific set of judgments (the [Consistency Index](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-index/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), CI) to the inconsistency of a large number of randomly generated judgments for a matrix of the same size (the Random Index, RI).

A CR below 0.10 suggests that the judgments are at least 90% more consistent than purely random entries, providing a sound basis for proceeding with the analysis. In the context of an RFP evaluation, where decisions can have multi-million dollar consequences and significant operational impacts, relying on a decision derived from inconsistent judgments is an unacceptable risk. The CR provides the necessary quality control gate. If the CR is too high, the AHP framework mandates a re-evaluation of the pairwise comparisons, forcing the evaluation team to identify and resolve the contradictions in their logic before a final decision is made. This process of revision is a feature, not a bug; it compels a deeper, more thoughtful consideration of the trade-offs involved, ultimately leading to a more robust and well-reasoned conclusion.

![A detailed cutaway of a spherical institutional trading system reveals an internal disk, symbolizing a deep liquidity pool. A high-fidelity probe interacts for atomic settlement, reflecting precise RFQ protocol execution within complex market microstructure for digital asset derivatives and Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-revealed.jpg)

![Luminous, multi-bladed central mechanism with concentric rings. This depicts RFQ orchestration for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimized price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Strategy

Integrating the Consistency Ratio into an RFP evaluation strategy transforms the process from a subjective exercise into a rigorous, auditable decision-making protocol. The strategic deployment of AHP, with the CR as its core validation mechanism, centers on systematically quantifying and verifying the expert judgments of the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The process begins with the decomposition of the primary goal ▴ selecting the best vendor ▴ into a hierarchy of measurable criteria. These criteria represent the value drivers for the project, such as ‘Technical Capability,’ ‘Cost-Effectiveness,’ ‘Vendor Reliability,’ and ‘Implementation Support’.

The power of the AHP method lies in its use of pairwise comparisons, where the committee evaluates every criterion against every other criterion on a numerical scale (typically 1 to 9) to establish their relative importance. This is where the first opportunity for inconsistency arises and where the CR’s strategic value becomes apparent.

![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

## The Architecture of Judgment

Once the criteria are weighted, the same pairwise comparison process is repeated for the vendors (the alternatives) under each individual criterion. For example, under ‘Cost-Effectiveness,’ Vendor A is compared to Vendor B, Vendor A to Vendor C, and Vendor B to Vendor C. This creates a series of judgment matrices, one for the criteria and one for each criterion’s vendor evaluations. It is within each of these matrices that consistency must be tested. A high CR in the criteria matrix indicates the committee has failed to establish a logical and transitive order of importance for what they value.

A high CR in a vendor matrix (e.g. for ‘Technical Capability’) means their assessment of the vendors’ technical offerings is logically flawed. The strategy is to isolate and rectify these inconsistencies at each level of the hierarchy. A high CR is a red flag that requires immediate attention, prompting the team to revisit their initial judgments. This iterative process of judgment and verification ensures that the foundation of the decision is sound before the final synthesis of results.

> Strategically, the Consistency Ratio acts as an iterative control loop, forcing a re-evaluation of judgments until the logical foundation of the RFP decision is mathematically sound.

![Abstract, layered spheres symbolize complex market microstructure and liquidity pools. A central reflective conduit represents RFQ protocols enabling block trade execution and precise price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, ensuring high-fidelity execution within institutional trading of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Judgment Matrices

The strategic advantage of this method becomes clear when considering the alternative. Without a mechanism like the CR, RFP evaluations often rely on simple weighted scoring models where criteria weights are assigned subjectively, without a formal test of their logical coherence. The AHP method, policed by the CR, provides a superior system. The table below illustrates a simplified pairwise comparison matrix for three criteria.

The values represent the judgment of the committee on the relative importance of each pair. For instance, ‘Cost’ is considered ‘moderately more important’ (a score of 3) than ‘Capability’. The matrix is then used to calculate the [priority vector](https://prime.greeks.live/area/priority-vector/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (the weights) and the Consistency Ratio to validate the judgments.

### Table 1 ▴ Pairwise Comparison Matrix for RFP Criteria

| Criterion | Cost | Capability | Support |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cost | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Capability | 1/3 | 1 | 2 |
| Support | 1/5 | 1/2 | 1 |

From this matrix, mathematical techniques are used to derive the relative priority of each criterion and, critically, to calculate the CR. If the CR for this matrix exceeds 0.10, the strategic implication is that the committee’s stated preferences are contradictory. They must then discuss and revise their judgments ▴ perhaps the 5:1 ratio between Cost and Support is too extreme given the 3:1 ratio between Cost and Capability. This structured re-evaluation is what builds confidence in the final weights assigned to each criterion, ensuring the subsequent vendor scoring is built upon a logical and agreed-upon foundation.

- **Goal Definition** ▴ The primary objective is clearly stated at the top of the hierarchy (e.g. “Select the Optimal ERP System”).

- **Criteria Identification** ▴ The factors crucial for the decision are identified (e.g. Functionality, Vendor Viability, Total Cost of Ownership, User Experience).

- **Alternative Listing** ▴ The potential vendors or solutions being evaluated are listed at the bottom of the hierarchy (e.g. Vendor X, Vendor Y, Vendor Z).

- **Pairwise Comparison Execution** ▴ Judgment matrices are created by comparing elements at each level. This systematic comparison is the core data-gathering phase of the AHP.

- **Consistency Verification** ▴ The Consistency Ratio is calculated for each matrix. Any matrix failing the consistency test (CR > 0.10) must be re-evaluated by the decision-makers. This step is non-negotiable for a valid AHP analysis.

![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

![Central polished disc, with contrasting segments, represents Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ core. A textured rod signifies RFQ Protocol High-Fidelity Execution and Low Latency Market Microstructure data flow to the Quantitative Analysis Engine for Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-system-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of the [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process in an RFP evaluation is a meticulous, data-driven procedure where the Consistency Ratio serves as the primary quality assurance metric at multiple stages. Its application moves beyond theory and strategy into a tangible, operational workflow that ensures the final procurement decision is transparent, justifiable, and rooted in logical consistency. The execution phase is where the raw, subjective opinions of the evaluation committee are forged into objective, defensible priorities.

![A pristine teal sphere, representing a high-fidelity digital asset, emerges from concentric layers of a sophisticated principal's operational framework. These layers symbolize market microstructure, aggregated liquidity pools, and RFQ protocol mechanisms ensuring best execution and optimal price discovery within an institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-2.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

Implementing AHP for an RFP evaluation follows a distinct, multi-step operational sequence. The process is designed to systematically eliminate bias and logical errors, with the CR acting as a critical checkpoint throughout.

- **Establish the Hierarchy** ▴ The first step is to formally structure the decision. This involves defining the overall goal, the key evaluation criteria, any sub-criteria, and the list of vendors (alternatives). This structure forms the roadmap for the entire evaluation.

- **Conduct Pairwise Comparison Workshops** ▴ The evaluation committee convenes to fill out the comparison matrices. Using Saaty’s 1-9 scale, they compare every element against every other element at the same level. For instance, on the ‘Security’ criterion, is Vendor A’s solution moderately (3) or strongly (5) superior to Vendor B’s? These workshops are critical for capturing expert judgment.

- **Calculate Priority Vectors and Consistency Ratios** ▴ For each completed matrix, the priority vector (weights) and the CR are calculated. This is typically done using specialized software or pre-built spreadsheets. The mathematical process involves finding the principal eigenvalue (λ_max) of the matrix. The Consistency Index (CI) is then calculated using the formula ▴ CI = (λ_max – n) / (n – 1), where ‘n’ is the number of items being compared.

- **Validate Judgments** ▴ The calculated CR is compared against the 0.10 threshold. If CR ≤ 0.10, the matrix is accepted as consistent, and its priority vector is considered valid. If CR > 0.10, the matrix is flagged for review.

- **Iterate and Refine** ▴ For inconsistent matrices, the committee must reconvene. The source of the inconsistency, often a judgment that is an order of magnitude different from others (e.g. a ‘9’ when other judgments are ‘2’s and ‘3’s), is identified. The team discusses the flawed logic and revises the judgment. This process is repeated until the CR falls within the acceptable range.

- **Synthesize Final Scores** ▴ Once all matrices are consistent, the final scores for each vendor are synthesized. This is done by multiplying the vendor’s local priorities (their scores on each criterion) by the weights of those criteria and summing the results. The vendor with the highest overall score is the mathematically preferred choice based on the committee’s consistent judgments.

![A precise central mechanism, representing an institutional RFQ engine, is bisected by a luminous teal liquidity pipeline. This visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling precise price discovery and atomic settlement within an optimized market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

To illustrate the execution, consider an RFP for a new CRM platform. The committee has established three criteria ▴ ‘Functionality’, ‘Integration Capability’, and ‘Price’. They are evaluating three vendors ▴ ‘InnovateCRM’, ‘ConnectSphere’, and ‘ValueStack’.

First, the criteria are compared. The resulting matrix and calculations are shown below.

### Table 2 ▴ Criteria Judgment Matrix and Consistency Calculation

| Criteria | Functionality | Integration | Price | Priority Vector (Weight) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Functionality | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0.57 |
| Integration | 1/2 | 1 | 3 | 0.32 |
| Price | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1 | 0.11 |

With the criteria weights validated, the team evaluates the vendors against each criterion. Below is the matrix for ‘Functionality’.

### Table 3 ▴ Vendor Comparison Matrix for ‘Functionality’

| Functionality | InnovateCRM | ConnectSphere | ValueStack | Local Priority |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| InnovateCRM | 1 | 4 | 6 | 0.71 |
| ConnectSphere | 1/4 | 1 | 3 | 0.19 |
| ValueStack | 1/6 | 1/3 | 1 | 0.10 |

This process is repeated for ‘Integration’ and ‘Price’. Once all matrices are deemed consistent, the final scores are compiled. The local priorities from each vendor matrix are multiplied by the corresponding criterion weight, and the results are summed to produce a final score for each vendor, providing a clear, defensible ranking.

![A glossy, segmented sphere with a luminous blue 'X' core represents a Principal's Prime RFQ. It highlights multi-dealer RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, signifying unified liquidity pools, market microstructure, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-core-for-best-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

A global logistics firm, “GlobalTrans,” initiated an RFP process to select a partner for a comprehensive overhaul of its warehouse management system (WMS). The project was critical, with an estimated budget of $15 million. The evaluation committee, led by the COO, comprised heads from IT, Operations, and Finance.

They shortlisted three vendors ▴ “LogiCore,” a market leader with a robust but expensive platform; “FlexiChain,” an agile newcomer with a highly customizable solution; and “OptiStock,” a mid-tier provider known for its cost-effective, no-frills system. The committee chose the AHP method to ensure a transparent and rigorous decision.

They defined four core criteria ▴ ‘Core WMS Functionality’ (C1), ‘Scalability & Future-Proofing’ (C2), ‘Total Cost of Ownership’ (C3), and ‘Implementation & Support’ (C4). In their first pairwise comparison workshop for the criteria, the debate was intense. The Head of Finance argued passionately for the primacy of Cost (C3), while the Head of IT emphasized Scalability (C2). Their initial judgments produced a CR of 0.18, well above the acceptable limit.

The AHP software flagged the primary source of inconsistency ▴ Finance had rated C3 as ‘absolutely more important’ (9) than C2, while IT had rated C2 as ‘strongly more important’ (5) than C4 (Implementation), and Operations had rated C4 as ‘equally important’ (1) to C3. The transitive logic was broken. The COO facilitated a second session, forcing the team to rationalize their judgments. They discussed the long-term strategic cost of a non-scalable system versus the immediate budget impact.

After a lengthy debate, they reached a consensus ▴ C2 was indeed more critical than C3, but not to the extreme degree initially judged. They revised the C2 vs. C3 comparison to 3 (‘moderately more important’) and adjusted other related values. The new calculation yielded a CR of 0.06. The foundation was now solid.

Next, they evaluated the vendors against each criterion. For ‘Core WMS Functionality’ (C1), LogiCore was the clear favorite, and the matrix was consistent (CR = 0.04). However, for ‘Scalability’ (C2), the judgments were again flawed, with a CR of 0.15. The inconsistency stemmed from differing opinions on FlexiChain’s architecture.

The IT lead saw its microservices-based design as highly scalable, rating it a 7 against OptiStock. The Operations lead, however, was wary of its newness and perceived risk, rating it only a 2. This discrepancy created a logical flaw. To resolve this, the committee requested a technical deep-dive session with FlexiChain’s architects.

Following the presentation and a Q&A, the Operations lead felt more confident, and the team revised the rating to a 5. The new CR for the ‘Scalability’ matrix dropped to 0.08. The process continued until all vendor matrices were consistent. The final synthesis revealed a close race ▴ LogiCore scored highest on functionality and support, but its high cost pulled its overall score down.

OptiStock was the cheapest but ranked last on scalability. FlexiChain, while not the top in any single category, offered the best-balanced profile across all weighted criteria. Its strong performance on the now heavily weighted ‘Scalability’ criterion, combined with a moderate cost, pushed its final score to 0.45, ahead of LogiCore (0.38) and OptiStock (0.17). The COO presented the result to the board, not just with a recommendation, but with a complete, auditable trail of logical judgments, validated at every step by the Consistency Ratio. The AHP process, governed by the CR, had transformed a potentially political and contentious decision into a transparent, strategic choice.

![A sleek, light-colored, egg-shaped component precisely connects to a darker, ergonomic base, signifying high-fidelity integration. This modular design embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for atomic settlement and best execution within a robust Principal's operational framework, enhancing market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-principal-system.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

For organizations that frequently conduct complex RFP evaluations, AHP can be embedded within dedicated Decision Support Systems (DSS) or modern e-procurement platforms. The technological architecture for such a system revolves around a central database and a computational engine.

- **Data Schema** ▴ The database must be designed to store the AHP hierarchy (goals, criteria, alternatives), user-defined comparison matrices, and the resulting priority vectors and CR values. This allows for a historical record of all decisions, which is invaluable for auditing and knowledge management.

- **API Endpoints** ▴ A well-designed system would feature API endpoints to allow for integration with other enterprise systems. For example, an POST /api/v1/ahp/matrix endpoint could allow an external system to submit a new [judgment matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/judgment-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for calculation. A GET /api/v1/ahp/results/{decisionId} endpoint would return the final weighted scores and consistency status for a given evaluation.

- **Computational Engine** ▴ The core of the system is the engine that performs the matrix algebra required to calculate the principal eigenvalue, the priority vector (eigenvector), the CI, and the CR. This engine must be robust and capable of handling matrices of varying sizes.

- **User Interface (UI)** ▴ The UI is critical for usability. It should provide an intuitive way for users to build hierarchies and input pairwise judgments. Critically, it must provide instant feedback, highlighting a matrix in red and displaying the CR value as soon as it exceeds the 0.10 threshold, guiding users to the most inconsistent judgment so they can revise it. Dashboards visualizing the final results, showing the breakdown of scores by criterion, are essential for communicating the outcome to stakeholders.

![A sophisticated metallic instrument, a precision gauge, indicates a calibrated reading, essential for RFQ protocol execution. Its intricate scales symbolize price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. _International journal of services sciences_, 1(1), 83-98.

- Vaidya, O. S. & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process ▴ An overview of applications. _European Journal of Operational Research_, 169(1), 1-29.

- Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process ▴ what it is and how it is used. _Mathematical Modelling_, 9(3-5), 161-176.

- Forman, E. H. & Gass, S. I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process ▴ an exposition. _Operations research_, 49(4), 469-486.

- Brunelli, M. (2015). _Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process_. Springer.

- Millet, I. & Saaty, T. L. (2000). On the relativity of relative measures ▴ accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. _European Journal of Operational Research_, 121(1), 205-212.

- Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision ▴ The analytic hierarchy process. _European journal of operational research_, 48(1), 9-26.

- Harker, P. T. & Vargas, L. G. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation ▴ Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. _Management science_, 33(11), 1383-1403.

![A precision-engineered blue mechanism, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution engine, emerges from a rounded, light-colored liquidity pool component, encased within a sleek teal institutional-grade shell. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, demonstrating algorithmic trading logic and smart order routing for block trades via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-core-algorithmic-execution-engine.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## From Calculation to Confidence

Ultimately, the Consistency Ratio transcends its mathematical function. It is more than a simple check for logical errors; it is a mechanism for building institutional confidence. In the high-stakes environment of RFP evaluations, where decisions commit vast resources and shape operational futures, the ability to defend a choice is paramount. The CR provides this defense.

It transforms the evaluation from a “black box” of subjective opinions into a transparent, structured, and auditable process. When a final selection is presented, it is backed by a documented trail of rational, consistent judgments. The conversation shifts from questioning the personal biases of the committee to examining a logical framework. This instills a deep-seated confidence in the outcome, not just for the decision-makers, but for the entire organization that must execute upon that decision. The true importance of the Consistency Ratio lies in its power to forge consensus and certainty from the complexities of human judgment.

![A futuristic, institutional-grade sphere, diagonally split, reveals a glowing teal core of intricate circuitry. This represents a high-fidelity execution engine for digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols, embodying market microstructure for latent liquidity and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate circuit boards and a precision metallic component depict the core technological infrastructure for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. This embodies high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement through sophisticated market microstructure, facilitating RFQ protocols for private quotation and block trade liquidity within a Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-crypto-derivatives-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured decision-making framework designed to organize and analyze complex problems involving multiple, often qualitative, criteria and subjective judgments, particularly valuable in strategic crypto investing and technology evaluation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Consistency Ratio

Meaning ▴ Consistency Ratio is a metric that quantifies the regularity and predictability of an asset's or a trading strategy's performance over a specified period. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic mechanism with a luminous blue sphere at its core represents a Liquidity Pool within a Crypto Derivatives OS. Surrounding rings symbolize intricate Market Microstructure, facilitating RFQ Protocol and High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-mechanism.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation is the systematic and objective process of assessing and comparing the proposals submitted by various vendors in response to a Request for Proposal, with the ultimate goal of identifying the most suitable solution or service provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precisely engineered central blue hub anchors segmented grey and blue components, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional trading of digital asset derivatives. This structure represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine, optimizing liquidity pool aggregation and price discovery through advanced market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-systemic-hub.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison

Meaning ▴ Pairwise Comparison, within the analysis of crypto systems architecture or investment strategies, refers to a structured method where individual elements are systematically compared against each other in pairs. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-index/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## Consistency Index

Meaning ▴ A Consistency Index in the crypto and institutional trading environment quantifies the degree of alignment or reliability within a set of data points, evaluations, or operational outputs over time. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee, in the context of institutional crypto investing, particularly for large-scale procurement of trading services, technology solutions, or strategic partnerships, refers to a designated group of experts responsible for assessing proposals and making recommendations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/priority-vector/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives execution platform showcases its core market microstructure. A speckled surface depicts real-time market data streams](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Priority Vector

Meaning ▴ A Priority Vector represents a quantitative array or ordered list that assigns relative importance or weight to various criteria, objectives, or system components. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A circular mechanism with a glowing conduit and intricate internal components represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. This system facilitates high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and algorithmic trading within market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/judgment-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central reflective sphere, representing a Principal's algorithmic trading core, rests within a luminous liquidity pool, intersected by a precise execution bar. This visualizes price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, reflecting market microstructure optimization within an institutional grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Judgment Matrix

Meaning ▴ A Judgment Matrix, within the context of crypto investment evaluation or RFQ response assessment, is a structured analytical tool used to systematically weigh and score various qualitative and quantitative criteria. </a>

**Tags:** [Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/), [Priority Vector](https://options.greeks.live/area/priority-vector/), [Consistency Index](https://options.greeks.live/area/consistency-index/), [Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [Judgment Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/judgment-matrix/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does the Analytic Hierarchy Process Improve Rfp Decision Making?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-rfp-decision-making/)
![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency. The Prime RFQ underpins algorithmic trading, minimizing latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

AHP installs a defensible architecture of reason into complex RFP decisions, ensuring outcomes align with strategic priorities.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for RFP Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-rfp-criteria/)
![A multi-layered, sectioned sphere reveals core institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Translucent layers depict dynamic RFQ liquidity pools and multi-leg spread execution. The opaque half signifies robust institutional-grade infrastructure. A central core embodies the Prime RFQ intelligence layer, enabling high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

RFP criteria weighting translates strategic intent into a quantitative protocol for optimal partner selection and risk mitigation.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

An RFP scoring model is a quantitative framework for translating strategic priorities into a defensible, data-driven vendor selection decision.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-criteria/)
![Two distinct, interlocking institutional-grade system modules, one teal, one beige, symbolize integrated Crypto Derivatives OS components. The beige module features a price discovery lens, while the teal represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, embodying capital efficiency within RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-modules.jpg)

Determining RFP criteria weights is a strategic process of encoding business priorities into a quantitative model to enable objective, data-driven vendor selection.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Score Qualitative Criteria in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-score-qualitative-criteria-in-an-rfp/)
![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

An organization can objectively score qualitative RFP criteria by creating a weighted scoring model that translates strategic priorities into a quantitative evaluation framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Ensure Fairness in Its RFP Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-fairness-in-its-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations. Translucent sections expose the quantitative analytics core enabling high-fidelity execution and low-latency order routing for Bitcoin options.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

An organization ensures RFP evaluation fairness by engineering a transparent, data-driven system with predefined, weighted criteria and strict governance.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Training an Rfp Evaluation Committee on a Weighted Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-training-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-on-a-weighted-scoring-model/)
![A precision mechanical assembly: black base, intricate metallic components, luminous mint-green ring with dark spherical core. This embodies an institutional Crypto Derivatives OS, its market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for intelligent liquidity aggregation and optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A trained RFP committee armed with a weighted scoring model transforms subjective review into a defensible, data-driven procurement decision.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Scoring Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/)
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool. This depicts high-fidelity execution of block trades through RFQ protocols in complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

An organization determines RFP scoring weights by systemically translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable value model.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Processes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-processes/)
![A reflective digital asset pipeline bisects a dynamic gradient, symbolizing high-fidelity RFQ execution across fragmented market microstructure. Concentric rings denote the Prime RFQ centralizing liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and managing counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-2.jpg)

Cognitive biases are systemic flaws in human judgment that can be mitigated through a robust, data-driven RFP evaluation architecture.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Importance of the Consistency Ratio in the AHP Method for RFP Evaluation?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-importance-of-the-consistency-ratio-in-the-ahp-method-for-rfp-evaluation/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-importance-of-the-consistency-ratio-in-the-ahp-method-for-rfp-evaluation/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Importance of the Consistency Ratio in the AHP Method for RFP Evaluation? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The Consistency Ratio is the AHP method's core integrity check, ensuring RFP evaluation outcomes are derived from logical, non-contradictory judgments. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-importance-of-the-consistency-ratio-in-the-ahp-method-for-rfp-evaluation/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T12:23:15+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-28T01:16:18+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, dark metallic system with a luminous blue core represents the cutting-edge of institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. This visual metaphor illustrates a Principal's operational framework facilitating RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spreads and block trades. It signifies Crypto Derivatives OS capabilities, enabling price discovery by illuminating latent liquidity and ensuring best execution. The core embodies an intelligence layer for advanced quantitative analysis, supporting portfolio margin and dynamic implied volatility."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Consistency Index",
        "Consistency Ratio",
        "Decision-Making Framework",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Judgment Matrix",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Priority Vector",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "Saaty Scale",
        "Vendor Selection"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-importance-of-the-consistency-ratio-in-the-ahp-method-for-rfp-evaluation/
