# What Is the Most Effective Way to Structure an Rfp Evaluation Committee? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![Translucent rods, beige, teal, and blue, intersect on a dark surface, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for digital asset derivatives. Nodes represent atomic settlement points within a Principal's operational framework, visualizing RFQ protocol aggregation, cross-asset liquidity streams, and optimized market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![A sleek, circular, metallic-toned device features a central, highly reflective spherical element, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and implied volatility for Bitcoin options. This private quotation interface within a Prime RFQ platform enables high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, minimizing information leakage and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub.jpg)

## Concept

An [RFP evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) functions as a critical mechanism for objective, data-driven decision-making in procurement. Its structure is the foundation upon which a fair, transparent, and strategically aligned [vendor selection process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is built. The assembly of this group represents a deliberate move to safeguard organizational resources, ensuring that capital is allocated not to the most persuasive proposal, but to the one demonstrating the most substantial, verifiable value. The integrity of the procurement outcome is a direct reflection of the committee’s composition and the procedural rigor it upholds.

The core purpose of the committee is to meticulously vet proposals against a predetermined set of criteria, providing a recommendation for an award to the offeror that presents the best possible solution for the entity. This involves a systematic deconstruction of each proposal, a process that demands diverse expertise and a commitment to impartiality. Committee members are entrusted with maintaining the confidentiality of vendor information and evaluation discussions, operating as fiduciaries of the organization’s interests. Their collective judgment forms the basis of a high-stakes investment decision, making the structural design of the committee a paramount concern.

> A properly structured RFP evaluation committee transforms procurement from a simple purchasing function into a strategic value-acquisition process.

![Abstract depiction of an advanced institutional trading system, featuring a prominent sensor for real-time price discovery and an intelligence layer. Visible circuitry signifies algorithmic trading capabilities, low-latency execution, and robust FIX protocol integration for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-high-fidelity-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## The Committee as a System of Governance

Viewing the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) through a systemic lens reveals its function as an internal control mechanism. Its structure dictates the flow of information, the application of analytical frameworks, and the mitigation of biases that can compromise a procurement decision. A well-designed committee integrates members from various functional areas, each contributing a unique perspective to the evaluation. This cross-functional composition ensures that the selected solution is not only technically sound but also financially viable, operationally practical, and aligned with overarching strategic objectives.

The effectiveness of this governance system hinges on several key principles. Committee members must possess the requisite knowledge and experience to contribute meaningfully to the evaluation. Their personal interests must not conflict with their duty of impartiality, and any potential conflicts must be disclosed and managed proactively.

The process itself must be transparent and documented, with all evaluation documents, including score sheets, often subject to public records requests. This accountability reinforces the committee’s role as a steward of organizational resources and a guardian of procedural fairness.

![A luminous, multi-faceted geometric structure, resembling interlocking star-like elements, glows from a circular base. This represents a Prime RFQ for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, symbolizing high-fidelity execution of block trades via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Foundational Elements of Committee Design

The design of an effective evaluation committee begins with defining its size and composition. An ideal committee is large enough to encompass a range of expertise yet small enough to remain agile and decisive. Typically, this involves three to five members, though the complexity of the RFP may warrant a larger group. The selection of these members is a critical step, requiring an assessment of their experience, availability, and ethical standing.

The roles within the committee must be clearly delineated. A chairperson is often appointed to guide the process, facilitate discussions, and ensure adherence to established timelines and guidelines. Other members may include end-users who will interact with the procured product or service, subject matter experts who can assess technical specifications, and representatives from finance or legal departments who can evaluate financial stability and contractual terms. A procurement officer typically serves as a non-voting facilitator, managing the process and acting as the sole point of contact with vendors to maintain a clear and unbiased communication channel.

![A futuristic, metallic sphere, the Prime RFQ engine, anchors two intersecting blade-like structures. These symbolize multi-leg spread strategies and precise algorithmic execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-for-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-in-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic framework for an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) committee extends beyond simple member selection. It involves the deliberate construction of a decision-making engine, calibrated to the specific demands of the procurement. Different strategic models for committee structure can be employed, each with distinct advantages depending on the nature of the RFP. The chosen strategy should optimize for expertise, efficiency, and objectivity, ensuring the [final recommendation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-grounds-for-challenging-an-expert-determiners-final-valuation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is robust and defensible.

A primary strategic consideration is the alignment of the committee’s composition with the RFP’s subject matter. For a complex technology acquisition, the committee might be heavily weighted with IT architects and cybersecurity specialists. In contrast, an RFP for professional services might necessitate a greater representation of individuals with expertise in project management and service level agreements. The strategy here is to create a panel whose collective acumen matches the complexity of the solution being procured.

![A layered, cream and dark blue structure with a transparent angular screen. This abstract visual embodies an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for high-fidelity RFQ execution, enabling deep liquidity aggregation and real-time risk management for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-structure-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Models for Committee Structure

Organizations can adopt several models for structuring their evaluation committees, each offering a different approach to managing the [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The choice of model is a strategic one, reflecting the organization’s priorities and the specific context of the RFP.

- **Cross-Functional Model** ▴ This is the most common approach, bringing together representatives from various departments such as the end-user department, finance, IT, and legal. Its strength lies in providing a holistic evaluation, ensuring all facets of a proposal are scrutinized from different professional viewpoints. This model promotes internal consensus and ensures the selected solution is well-integrated into the organization’s existing operational fabric.

- **Tiered Evaluation Model** ▴ For highly complex or high-value RFPs, a tiered structure can be effective. A primary committee of subject matter experts might conduct the initial technical evaluation, shortlisting the most viable proposals. A secondary, executive-level committee could then review the shortlist, focusing on strategic fit, financial implications, and long-term value. This approach concentrates expertise where it is most needed and allows senior leaders to focus on the most critical decision points.

- **Advisory Committee Model** ▴ In some cases, the core evaluation committee may be supplemented by an advisory group. This group could consist of external consultants or internal stakeholders who provide input on specific aspects of the proposals without being involved in the formal scoring process. This model allows the committee to draw on a wider pool of expertise without expanding the core decision-making body, which could slow down the process.

![A precise, multi-faceted geometric structure represents institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. Its sharp angles denote high-fidelity execution and price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, symbolizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## The Strategic Importance of the Chairperson

The role of the chairperson is of high strategic importance to the success of the evaluation process. This individual is responsible for more than just administrative oversight; they set the tone for the committee’s deliberations and ensure the integrity of the evaluation is maintained. An effective chairperson understands the strategic objectives of the procurement and is skilled at facilitating discussions to build consensus among members with diverse perspectives.

The chairperson’s ability to manage the committee’s dynamics is critical. They must ensure that all members have an opportunity to contribute, that discussions remain focused on the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and that any conflicts or biases are addressed promptly and transparently. Their leadership is instrumental in guiding the committee from individual proposal reviews to a collective, well-reasoned recommendation.

> The selection of a committee model is a strategic decision that shapes the entire evaluation landscape, defining how expertise is leveraged and how the final decision is forged.

![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Establishing the Evaluation Framework

A cornerstone of the committee’s strategy is the establishment of a clear and objective evaluation framework before any proposals are reviewed. This framework typically includes a set of [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) criteria that directly correspond to the requirements outlined in the RFP. The process of developing this framework is a strategic exercise in itself, forcing the organization to prioritize its needs and define what constitutes “value” for a particular procurement.

The table below illustrates a sample high-level comparison of different strategic considerations when forming an evaluation committee.

### Strategic Committee Formation Considerations

| Consideration | Strategic Importance | Associated Risks |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Committee Size | Balances diversity of input with decision-making efficiency. A group of 3-5 is often optimal. | Too large a committee can lead to scheduling difficulties and prolonged debates. Too small a group may lack sufficient expertise. |
| Member Expertise | Ensures a thorough and competent evaluation of technical, financial, and operational aspects of proposals. | A lack of relevant expertise can result in a superficial evaluation and a poor vendor choice. Over-reliance on a single expert can introduce bias. |
| Role Definition | Clarifies responsibilities, from the chairperson’s leadership to the facilitator’s process management. | Ambiguous roles can lead to process gaps, duplicated effort, or conflicts over authority. |
| Conflict of Interest Management | Maintains the impartiality and integrity of the evaluation process. | Undisclosed conflicts can compromise the objectivity of the decision and expose the organization to legal challenges. |

The evaluation criteria should be specific, measurable, and directly tied to the project’s goals. It is also a common best practice to withhold cost information from the committee until after the initial technical evaluation is complete. This strategy prevents the price from unduly influencing the scoring of non-price criteria, ensuring a more objective assessment of each proposal’s intrinsic merits. The final recommendation is then based on a comprehensive view of both technical quality and overall value.

![Precision system for institutional digital asset derivatives. Translucent elements denote multi-leg spread structures and RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-infrastructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase of an RFP evaluation committee’s work is a structured, multi-step process that demands meticulous attention to detail and unwavering adherence to the established guidelines. This operational playbook ensures that the evaluation is conducted in a fair, consistent, and defensible manner, culminating in a recommendation that represents the best value for the organization. The process begins with the formal kickoff of the committee and proceeds through individual and collective evaluation activities to the final documentation and submission of the award recommendation.

![A sleek, multi-faceted plane represents a Principal's operational framework and Execution Management System. A central glossy black sphere signifies a block trade digital asset derivative, executed with atomic settlement via an RFQ protocol's private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-principal-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Evaluation

A successful evaluation process follows a clear and logical sequence of events. Each step is designed to build upon the last, moving the committee from a broad review of all proposals to a focused decision on a single vendor. This systematic approach is critical for maintaining the integrity and objectivity of the outcome.

- **Committee Kickoff and Training** ▴ The process begins with a formal kickoff meeting where the chairperson reviews the RFP, the evaluation criteria, the scoring methodology, and the timeline. All members must complete any required training on the evaluation process and sign confidentiality and conflict of interest disclosure agreements before receiving any proposal documents. This initial session ensures that all evaluators have a common understanding of their roles, responsibilities, and the procedural rules that will govern their work.

- **Individual Proposal Review and Scoring** ▴ Each committee member independently reviews and scores every responsive proposal against the predefined evaluation criteria. Members should use a standardized scoring worksheet and provide detailed comments to justify their scores for each criterion. This individual work is done in isolation to prevent premature influence from other members and to ensure that the initial scoring reflects each evaluator’s independent professional judgment.

- **[Consensus Scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Meetings** ▴ After the individual scoring is complete, the committee meets to discuss the proposals as a group. The chairperson facilitates a discussion of each proposal, allowing members to share their perspectives and insights. During these meetings, evaluators can ask clarifying questions of one another and may adjust their initial scores based on the discussion. The goal is not to force unanimity, but to arrive at a collective, well-understood assessment of each proposal’s strengths and weaknesses.

- **Shortlisting and Vendor Presentations** ▴ Based on the consensus scores, the committee may create a shortlist of the top-scoring vendors. These vendors may be invited to give presentations or demonstrations to the committee, providing an opportunity for deeper engagement and clarification. Following these presentations, the committee may conduct a final round of scoring for the shortlisted vendors.

- **Reference Checks and Due Diligence** ▴ The committee, often with the assistance of the procurement officer, conducts thorough reference checks for the top-ranked vendors. This step is crucial for verifying the claims made in the proposals and for gaining insight into the vendors’ past performance. Financial due diligence may also be performed at this stage to assess the vendors’ stability.

- **Final Recommendation and Documentation** ▴ The committee synthesizes all the information gathered ▴ scores, presentation feedback, reference checks, and cost proposals ▴ to make a final recommendation for award. This recommendation, along with all scoring sheets and supporting documentation, is compiled into a formal report and submitted to the appropriate authority for final approval. The thoroughness of this documentation is vital, as it provides the official record of the evaluation and the justification for the award decision.

![A sophisticated internal mechanism of a split sphere reveals the core of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol. Polished surfaces reflect intricate components, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery within digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling the Evaluation

A cornerstone of the execution phase is the use of a quantitative scoring model to provide a structured and objective basis for comparison. A [weighted scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a common and effective tool for this purpose. The table below provides a detailed example of such a matrix for a hypothetical technology RFP.

### Sample Weighted Scoring Matrix

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Vendor A Score (1-5) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (1-5) | Vendor B Weighted Score | Evaluator Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution | 40% | 4 | 1.6 | 5 | 2.0 | Vendor B’s platform offers superior integration capabilities. |
| Implementation Plan | 20% | 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.6 | Vendor A provided a more detailed and realistic project timeline. |
| Company Experience & Stability | 15% | 4 | 0.6 | 4 | 0.6 | Both vendors demonstrate strong market presence and positive financials. |
| Support & Maintenance | 15% | 3 | 0.45 | 4 | 0.6 | Vendor B offers 24/7 support, which is a key requirement. |
| Training Program | 10% | 4 | 0.4 | 3 | 0.3 | Vendor A’s proposed on-site training is more comprehensive. |
| Total Technical Score | 100% | – | 4.05 | – | 4.10 | Scores are close; presentations will be critical. |

In this model, each criterion is assigned a weight reflecting its importance to the organization. Evaluators assign a raw score to each vendor for each criterion, which is then multiplied by the weight to calculate a weighted score. The sum of the weighted scores provides a total technical score for each vendor, allowing for a quantitative comparison. The comments section is crucial for capturing the qualitative reasoning behind the scores, providing context for the numerical ratings.

> The disciplined execution of a quantitative scoring model is what translates subjective professional judgment into a defensible, objective procurement decision.

![Stacked precision-engineered circular components, varying in size and color, rest on a cylindrical base. This modular assembly symbolizes a robust Crypto Derivatives OS architecture, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Managing the Human Element

While quantitative models provide structure, the execution of an evaluation is an inherently human process. The committee must be managed in a way that leverages the collective expertise of its members while mitigating the potential for bias. Clear ground rules for conduct are essential for this purpose.

- **Maintaining Confidentiality** ▴ All proposal contents and committee discussions must be kept strictly confidential. Members should be reminded that any breach of confidentiality can compromise the integrity of the procurement and have legal consequences.

- **Ensuring Impartiality** ▴ Evaluators must score proposals based solely on the information contained within them and against the established criteria. They should not be influenced by prior relationships with vendors or by information obtained outside of the formal process. Any potential conflicts of interest must be managed according to the organization’s policies.

- **Facilitating Open Discussion** ▴ The chairperson must create an environment where all members feel comfortable sharing their opinions and challenging one another’s assumptions in a professional and constructive manner. Side discussions between members should be discouraged in favor of open dialogue within the full committee.

- **Documenting Everything** ▴ All scores, comments, and decisions must be thoroughly documented. These records are not only essential for supporting the final recommendation but are also critical in the event of a vendor protest or a public records request. Evaluators should be aware that their notes and scoresheets can become part of the public record.

By combining a rigorous operational playbook, a robust quantitative model, and careful management of the human elements, an RFP evaluation committee can execute its duties with the highest degree of professionalism and integrity, delivering a procurement outcome that truly serves the organization’s best interests.

![A sleek, metallic multi-lens device with glowing blue apertures symbolizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine. Its precision optics enable real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution, facilitating automated price discovery and aggregated inquiry within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## References

- Arkansas Tech University. “RFP/RFQ Committee Member Evaluation Guidelines.” Arkansas Tech University, n.d.

- Bevis, Michael. “A Buyer’s Guide ▴ How to Prepare for an RFP Evaluation Committee.” NIGP ▴ The Institute for Public Procurement, n.d.

- Supreme Court of Ohio. “RFP Evaluation Committee Guidelines.” Supreme Court of Ohio, n.d.

- North Dakota Office of Management and Budget. “RFP Evaluator’s Guide.” State of North Dakota, n.d.

- “RFP Evaluation Training.” SlideShare, Uploaded by a user, 2015.

![Symmetrical, institutional-grade Prime RFQ component for digital asset derivatives. Metallic segments signify interconnected liquidity pools and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-prime-os-for-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek, metallic, X-shaped object with a central circular core floats above mountains at dusk. It signifies an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency across dark pools for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-principal-rfq-protocol-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-optimal-price-discovery-and-execution.jpg)

## The Committee as a Reflection of Organizational Maturity

The structure and conduct of an RFP evaluation committee offer a clear window into an organization’s procurement maturity. An ad-hoc, poorly defined process often yields suboptimal outcomes, tethering the organization to solutions that fail to deliver long-term value. In contrast, a disciplined, systematic approach to evaluation is the hallmark of a strategically-minded entity that views procurement not as a cost center, but as a critical enabler of its mission. The rigor applied to the committee’s formation and operation is a direct investment in the quality of the organization’s future partnerships and capabilities.

Consider the internal systems your own organization relies upon for high-stakes decisions. Does the framework for [vendor selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) possess the same level of structural integrity and procedural clarity as your financial accounting or quality control systems? The principles of objectivity, expertise, and transparency are universal.

Applying them to the procurement process through a well-structured evaluation committee elevates the function from a tactical necessity to a source of sustainable competitive advantage. The ultimate question is how this internal system can be continuously refined to enhance the precision and strategic alignment of every significant acquisition.

![A metallic, circular mechanism, a precision control interface, rests on a dark circuit board. This symbolizes the core intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ, enabling low-latency, high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via optimized RFQ protocols, refining market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, abstract geometric form represents a dynamic RFQ Protocol for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives. A central liquidity pool is surrounded by opening market segments, revealing an emerging arm displaying high-fidelity execution data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An RFP Evaluation Committee functions as a dedicated, cross-functional internal module responsible for the systematic assessment of vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Vendor Selection Process

Meaning ▴ The Vendor Selection Process defines a formalized, data-driven methodology for identifying, evaluating, and engaging external technology or service providers crucial for the operational integrity and strategic advantage of an institutional digital asset trading ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives execution system cutaway. The teal Prime RFQ casing reveals intricate market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-grounds-for-challenging-an-expert-determiners-final-valuation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Final Recommendation

Grounds for challenging an expert valuation are narrow, focusing on procedural failures like fraud, bias, or material departure from instructions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract image features angular, parallel metallic and colored planes, suggesting structured market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. A spherical element represents a block trade or RFQ protocol inquiry, reflecting dynamic implied volatility and price discovery within a dark pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-ensuring-principal-best-execution-and-latent-liquidity-capture.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract forms symbolize institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Core system supports liquidity pool sphere, layered RFQ protocol platform](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

MiFID II mandates a data-driven, auditable RFQ process, transforming counterparty evaluation into a quantitative discipline to ensure best execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, interconnected metallic components with glowing blue accents depict a sophisticated institutional trading platform. A central element and button signify high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Luminous, multi-bladed central mechanism with concentric rings. This depicts RFQ orchestration for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimized price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring defines a computational methodology where multiple input variables are assigned distinct coefficients or weights, reflecting their relative importance, before being aggregated into a single, composite metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, multifaceted RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries via precise execution pathways and robust capital conduits. This institutional-grade system optimizes liquidity aggregation, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-high-fidelity-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## Consensus Scoring

Meaning ▴ Consensus Scoring defines a robust computational methodology for deriving a singular, authoritative value from a diverse set of potentially disparate data inputs or expert assessments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, precision-engineered core system, with metallic rings and an active segment, represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent, faceted shaft symbolizes high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, real-time price discovery, and atomic settlement, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Matrix is a computational framework designed to systematically evaluate and rank multiple alternatives or inputs by assigning numerical scores to predefined criteria, where each criterion is then weighted according to its determined relative significance, thereby yielding a composite quantitative assessment that facilitates comparative analysis and informed decision support within complex operational systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

## Vendor Selection

Meaning ▴ Vendor Selection defines the systematic, analytical process undertaken by an institutional entity to identify, evaluate, and onboard third-party service providers for critical technological and operational components within its digital asset derivatives infrastructure. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-committee/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [Vendor Selection Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-process/), [Procurement Best Practices](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-best-practices/), [Weighted Scoring Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-matrix/), [RFP Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [Should the Price or Cost Criterion Always Have the Highest Weight in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/should-the-price-or-cost-criterion-always-have-the-highest-weight-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

The weight of the price criterion is a strategic calibration of an organization's priorities, not a default setting.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Non-Price Criteria to Include in an RFP Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-non-price-criteria-to-include-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A precision mechanism, symbolizing an algorithmic trading engine, centrally mounted on a market microstructure surface. Lens-like features represent liquidity pools and an intelligence layer for pre-trade analytics, enabling high-fidelity execution of institutional grade digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

Effective RFP evaluation hinges on a weighted scoring of non-price criteria like technical proficiency, past performance, and strategic fit.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Conducting a Fair and Unbiased RFP Consensus Scoring Meeting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-conducting-a-fair-and-unbiased-rfp-consensus-scoring-meeting/)
![A precision-engineered teal metallic mechanism, featuring springs and rods, connects to a light U-shaped interface. This represents a core RFQ protocol component enabling automated price discovery and high-fidelity execution. It signifies a Principal's operational framework for institutional block trades, multi-leg spreads, and optimizing latency within a Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-execution-engine-component-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A fair RFP consensus meeting is a systemically designed protocol that neutralizes bias through structured deliberation and data-driven analysis.

- 
### [How Can Weighted Scoring in an Rfp Mitigate the Risk of Adverse Selection?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-mitigate-the-risk-of-adverse-selection/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency. A metallic button suggests precise private quotation control.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

Weighted scoring mitigates adverse selection by translating strategic priorities into a quantitative framework that values holistic capability over low price.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Manage Subjective Criteria in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-manage-subjective-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Abstract geometric forms, symbolizing bilateral quotation and multi-leg spread components, precisely interact with robust institutional-grade infrastructure. This represents a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating high-fidelity execution via an RFQ workflow, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-infrastructure.jpg)

Effective RFP evaluation transforms subjective criteria into a structured, quantifiable system, ensuring defensible and superior vendor selection.

- 
### [How Can a Weighted Scoring Matrix Improve Rfp Decision Making?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-weighted-scoring-matrix-improve-rfp-decision-making/)
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix improves RFP decisions by replacing subjectivity with a data-driven, transparent, and defensible evaluation framework.

- 
### [How Do You Create an Effective and Objective Weighted Scoring Rubric for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-effective-and-objective-weighted-scoring-rubric-for-an-rfp/)
![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution. Reflections suggest price discovery and atomic settlement in institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

A weighted scoring rubric is a decision-making system that translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable, objective vendor evaluation framework.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Structuring an Evaluation Committee for RFP Responses?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-structuring-an-evaluation-committee-for-rfp-responses/)
![Intersecting teal cylinders and flat bars, centered by a metallic sphere, abstractly depict an institutional RFQ protocol. This engine ensures high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure, atomic settlement, and price discovery across aggregated liquidity pools for Principal Market Makers.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

Structuring an RFP evaluation committee is the systematic assembly of a cross-functional decision-making unit to ensure objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Structure an Rfp Evaluation and Scoring System for Fairness?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-and-scoring-system-for-fairness/)
![A layered, cream and dark blue structure with a transparent angular screen. This abstract visual embodies an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for high-fidelity RFQ execution, enabling deep liquidity aggregation and real-time risk management for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-structure-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

A fair RFP evaluation system is a data-driven framework for objective, transparent, and defensible vendor selection.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Most Effective Way to Structure an Rfp Evaluation Committee?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Most Effective Way to Structure an Rfp Evaluation Committee? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An effective RFP evaluation committee is a governance system designed for objective, data-driven vendor selection and strategic value acquisition. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T00:00:57+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T00:01:04+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-module.jpg",
        "caption": "This advanced Prime RFQ component features a refined interface for institutional trading of digital asset derivatives. Its dual display visualizes order book dynamics and volatility surface data, crucial for algorithmic trading strategies. Designed for best execution via optimized RFQ protocols, it mitigates counterparty risk and enables portfolio margin management. This module ensures atomic settlement and alpha generation within dark liquidity pools for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Conflict of Interest Policy",
        "Consensus Scoring",
        "Cross-Functional Team",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Procurement Best Practices",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Public Sector Procurement",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Committee",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Process Management",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Vendor Selection Process",
        "Weighted Scoring",
        "Weighted Scoring Matrix"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/
