# What Is the Optimal Price Weighting to Use in a Complex Service Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, translucent fin-like structure emerges from a circular base against a dark background. This abstract form represents RFQ protocols and price discovery in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol.jpg)

![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives execution system cutaway. The teal Prime RFQ casing reveals intricate market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

## Concept

The question of an optimal [price weighting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a [complex service](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-service-level-agreements-slas-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process-for-a-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a search for a precise number in a domain defined by ambiguity. The instinct is to seek a single, defensible percentage ▴ a figure that balances fiscal prudence with a desire for quality. However, for services characterized by intricate dependencies, emergent requirements, and long-term strategic implications, the very notion of a static, optimal price weight is a foundational error in judgment. The task is not to find a number, but to construct a valuation system.

This system must subordinate the price consideration to a more telling metric ▴ the total value delivered over the lifecycle of the engagement. A complex service, whether it is a bespoke software build, a multi-channel marketing campaign, or a comprehensive logistics overhaul, is a dynamic entity. Its success is a function of the provider’s adaptability, expertise, and collaborative capability. Over-indexing on price in such a scenario is a direct trade against these very qualities.

It incentivizes bidders to propose a lean, rigid solution that may meet the letter of the RFP but is brittle in the face of real-world operational demands. The true cost of a complex service is rarely the initial [bid price](https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite); it is the sum of that price and the costs of managing unforeseen risks, missed opportunities, and the friction of a poorly aligned partnership.

Therefore, the conversation must shift from price weighting to value architecture. This approach re-frames the RFP process from a procurement exercise into a strategic capability assessment. It begins with the premise that price is an output of the evaluation, not its dominant driver. The core intellectual work is to first meticulously define the components of “value” as they pertain to the specific service.

This requires a deep internal alignment on the strategic objectives of the procurement. Is the primary goal to import disruptive innovation, to achieve operational stability, to mitigate a specific enterprise risk, or to build a long-term capability? Each objective logically implies a different valuation structure. An RFP seeking innovation might place the highest premium on the technical acumen and demonstrated creativity of the bidding team, rendering the price a secondary or even tertiary consideration.

Conversely, an RFP for a well-defined, commoditizable service component might justify a more substantial price weighting. The “optimality” of the price factor is thus a dynamic variable, derived from strategic intent. It is a reflection of the procuring organization’s clarity about what it is truly buying ▴ a solution, a partnership, or a capability.

![A multi-faceted digital asset derivative, precisely calibrated on a sophisticated circular mechanism. This represents a Prime Brokerage's robust RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage within complex market microstructure, critical for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-2.jpg)

![A complex core mechanism with two structured arms illustrates a Principal Crypto Derivatives OS executing RFQ protocols. This system enables price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives block trades, optimizing market microstructure and capital efficiency via private quotations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-system.jpg)

## Strategy

![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## From Price-Led Procurement to Value-Driven Selection

Constructing a strategic framework for evaluating complex service RFPs requires moving beyond the simple price-versus-quality dichotomy. It involves designing a [multi-criteria decision analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (MCDA) model tailored to the specific context of the service. The foundation of this model is the explicit definition of strategic priorities. An organization must first reach a consensus on what constitutes a successful outcome.

This moves the evaluation from a simple cost-based decision to a holistic assessment of a potential partner’s ability to deliver sustained value. The weight assigned to price becomes a direct consequence of this strategic alignment, rather than an arbitrary figure. Best practices often suggest a price weighting of 20-30% for complex projects, a range that acknowledges fiscal responsibility without allowing cost to eclipse critical [non-price factors](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-price-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

> A procurement process that over-weights price risks acquiring an inexpensive service that ultimately fails to deliver the required strategic outcomes.

The initial step is to categorize the procurement’s primary objective. These objectives can be broadly classified, each suggesting a different evaluation architecture. For instance, a project focused on acquiring a cutting-edge technology partner to drive innovation will have a vastly different evaluation profile from one aimed at outsourcing a mature, stable business process with a focus on efficiency and cost reduction.

The former prioritizes the vendor’s research and development capabilities, the expertise of their key personnel, and their proposed methodology for co-creation. The latter places a higher emphasis on process maturity, security protocols, and, consequently, the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

![A refined object featuring a translucent teal element, symbolizing a dynamic RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precision embodies High-Fidelity Execution and seamless Price Discovery within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-for-optimal-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Core Evaluation Philosophies

Different strategic goals demand different evaluation philosophies. These are not mutually exclusive but represent a spectrum of focus that guides the allocation of scoring weights. Understanding these philosophies allows an organization to consciously design an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process that reflects its true priorities.

- **[Total Cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of Ownership (TCO) Focus** ▴ This approach looks beyond the initial bid price to encompass all direct and indirect costs over the service’s lifecycle. This includes implementation, training, maintenance, support, and eventual decommissioning or transition costs. A TCO model is particularly relevant for technology acquisitions or long-term managed services where operational costs can significantly exceed the initial purchase price. The price weighting itself might remain moderate, but the “price” being evaluated is a comprehensive, multi-year financial model, not a single number.

- **[Value for Money](https://prime.greeks.live/area/value-for-money/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (VfM) Maximization** ▴ This philosophy seeks the optimal combination of whole-life cost and quality to meet the user’s requirement. It is a more balanced approach than pure TCO, explicitly integrating a structured assessment of non-price criteria. The core of a VfM strategy is a robust scoring system for qualitative factors, where each point of quality has an implicit monetary value. This is common in public sector procurement where demonstrating public value is a mandate.

- **Innovation and Capability Acquisition** ▴ For services where the goal is to gain access to new technologies, novel methodologies, or world-class expertise, the evaluation framework must prioritize these elements heavily. In such cases, price might be weighted as low as 10-20%. The evaluation would focus on the vendor’s [technical solution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-solution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), case studies of past innovations, the caliber of the proposed team, and their plan for knowledge transfer. The procurement of a design-build contract for a complex infrastructure project, for example, should weight qualifications and technical approach higher than price to avoid selecting a technically inferior but low-cost bidder. 

- **Risk Mitigation Focus** ▴ When a service is critical to business continuity or involves significant data security, compliance, or reputational risk, the evaluation must be structured to heavily penalize potential weaknesses in these areas. The scoring for security protocols, business continuity plans, and demonstrated compliance with relevant regulations would be paramount. Price becomes a secondary factor after a vendor has passed a high bar for risk management and operational resilience.

![A central teal sphere, representing the Principal's Prime RFQ, anchors radiating grey and teal blades, signifying diverse liquidity pools and high-fidelity execution paths for digital asset derivatives. Transparent overlays suggest pre-trade analytics and volatility surface dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-and-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Comparative Weighting Strategies

The following table illustrates how different strategic objectives can translate into tangible weighting schemes for an RFP evaluation. The scenarios are illustrative, designed to show the logical connection between intent and evaluation structure.

| Evaluation Criterion | Scenario A ▴ Innovation Partner (AI Platform) | Scenario B ▴ Mature Process Outsourcing (HR Payroll) | Scenario C ▴ Critical Infrastructure (Data Center) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution & Methodology | 40% | 25% | 30% |
| Vendor Experience & Team Caliber | 25% | 20% | 20% |
| Security, Risk & Compliance | 15% | 30% | 40% |
| Price (Total Cost of Ownership) | 20% | 25% | 10% |

This table demonstrates that the “optimal” price weighting is a function of the service’s context. A 20% weight for price is appropriate for the AI platform where the technical solution is paramount, while a 10% weight is justified for the data center where security and resilience are the overwhelming concerns. The key is that the allocation of weights is a deliberate strategic choice, not a default setting.

![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

![The abstract image features angular, parallel metallic and colored planes, suggesting structured market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. A spherical element represents a block trade or RFQ protocol inquiry, reflecting dynamic implied volatility and price discovery within a dark pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-ensuring-principal-best-execution-and-latent-liquidity-capture.jpg)

## Execution

![A metallic, modular trading interface with black and grey circular elements, signifying distinct market microstructure components and liquidity pools. A precise, blue-cored probe diagonally integrates, representing an advanced RFQ engine for granular price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies in institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-price-discovery.jpg)

## Designing the Value-Based Evaluation System

Executing a value-driven RFP evaluation requires a disciplined, multi-stage process that translates strategic objectives into a granular, defensible scoring mechanism. This system must be designed before the RFP is issued and communicated transparently to all bidders. Its purpose is to ensure that the final selection is the logical output of a fair and rigorous analysis, minimizing subjectivity and bias.

A critical aspect of this is managing the “lower bid bias,” where evaluators, if aware of pricing upfront, may subconsciously favor the cheaper option even when assessing qualitative factors. A two-stage evaluation, where technical proposals are scored before price envelopes are opened, is a robust method to mitigate this.

![A stylized rendering illustrates a robust RFQ protocol within an institutional market microstructure, depicting high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. A transparent mechanism channels a precise order, symbolizing efficient price discovery and atomic settlement for block trades via a prime brokerage system](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-options-high-fidelity-trading.jpg)

## Step 1 ▴ Deconstruct the Service into Evaluation Components

The first operational step is to break down the complex service into a set of discrete, measurable evaluation criteria. These criteria must be comprehensive, covering all aspects of performance that contribute to the total value. Each criterion should be clearly defined to ensure all evaluators are assessing the same attributes.

- **Define Categories** ▴ Group the criteria into logical high-level categories, as shown in the strategy section (e.g. Technical Capability, Vendor Profile, Risk Management, Financials).

- **Develop Sub-Criteria** ▴ Within each category, define specific, observable sub-criteria. For example, under “Technical Capability,” sub-criteria might include ‘Proposed Architecture,’ ‘[Implementation Plan](https://prime.greeks.live/area/implementation-plan/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),’ ‘Scalability,’ and ‘User Interface Design.’

- **Assign Weights** ▴ Allocate percentage weights to each category based on the strategic priority of the procurement. Then, distribute that weight across the sub-criteria within the category. This hierarchical weighting ensures that the most critical elements have the greatest impact on the final score.

![Sleek, angled structures intersect, reflecting a central convergence. Intersecting light planes illustrate RFQ Protocol pathways for Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution in Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-microstructure.jpg)

## Step 2 ▴ Construct the Scoring Rubric

A detailed [scoring rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is essential for converting qualitative assessments into quantitative data. It provides a consistent scale for evaluators and makes the scoring process transparent and auditable. A five-point scale is often effective, as it provides enough granularity to differentiate between proposals without being overly complex.

> A well-defined scoring rubric is the mechanism that translates subjective expert judgment into objective, comparable data points.

An example of a scoring rubric for a single sub-criterion, ‘Implementation Plan,’ might look like this:

- **5 (Excellent)** ▴ The plan is comprehensive, realistic, and detailed. It identifies all major tasks, dependencies, and potential risks, with clear mitigation strategies. The timeline is well-justified and resources are appropriately allocated. The plan demonstrates a deep understanding of our operational environment.

- **4 (Good)** ▴ The plan covers all essential elements and is generally well-structured. Some minor details may be missing, or certain risk mitigations could be more robust. The timeline is aggressive but achievable.

- **3 (Acceptable)** ▴ The plan meets the basic requirements of the RFP but lacks detail. It identifies major tasks but overlooks some dependencies. The risk assessment is superficial. The proposal provides a plausible path to completion.

- **2 (Poor)** ▴ The plan is incomplete or unrealistic. Major tasks are missing, the timeline is unachievable, and the resource allocation is inadequate. It demonstrates a poor understanding of the project’s complexity.

- **1 (Unacceptable)** ▴ The proposal fails to provide a credible implementation plan or the plan submitted has critical flaws that make it non-viable.

![A sleek, precision-engineered device with a split-screen interface displaying implied volatility and price discovery data for digital asset derivatives. This institutional grade module optimizes RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-module.jpg)

## Step 3 ▴ The Scoring and Normalization Process

Once proposals are received, the evaluation team uses the rubric to score the non-price criteria. The raw scores are then multiplied by the predefined weights to calculate a total [quality score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for each vendor. The process of evaluating and scoring pricing, especially when proposals contain different structures or bundled elements, requires a normalization process to enable a true like-for-like comparison. 

The final stage is to combine the quality score with the [price score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). A common method is the Value for Money (VfM) formula, which creates a unified score. A widely used formula is:

**Final Score = (Quality Score × Quality Weighting) + (Price Score × Price Weighting)**

To calculate the Price Score, the lowest compliant bid is typically awarded the maximum available points, and other bids are scored inversely proportional to their price. The formula for the price score of a given vendor is:

**Price Score = (Lowest Bid Price / Vendor’s Bid Price) × Maximum Price Points**

![Close-up of intricate mechanical components symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. These precision parts reflect market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol framework, ensuring capital efficiency and optimal price discovery for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/engineered-core-systems-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Illustrative Evaluation Model in Practice

The following table provides a detailed, granular example of a complete evaluation for a hypothetical “Digital Transformation Platform” RFP. This demonstrates the full execution of the system, from weighted criteria to the final combined score.

| Evaluation Category & Sub-Criterion | Weight | Vendor A Score (1-5) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (1-5) | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (40%) | | | | | |
| Platform Architecture | 15% | 5 | 7.50 | 4 | 6.00 |
| Implementation Plan | 15% | 4 | 6.00 | 5 | 7.50 |
| Data Security Model | 10% | 5 | 5.00 | 3 | 3.00 |
| Vendor Profile (30%) | | | | | |
| Relevant Case Studies | 15% | 4 | 6.00 | 4 | 6.00 |
| Key Personnel Experience | 15% | 5 | 7.50 | 3 | 4.50 |
| Total Quality Score (out of 70) | 70% | | 32.00 | | 27.00 |

In this detailed execution, Vendor B wins the contract. Despite having a significantly lower quality score, their substantially lower price gave them the maximum price score, which was enough to overcome the quality deficit based on the 70/30 quality-to-price weighting. This outcome is a direct result of the evaluation system’s design.

If the strategic intent had been to prioritize technical excellence above all, a 90/10 weighting might have been used, which would have resulted in Vendor A winning. This underscores the central thesis ▴ the “optimal” weighting is the one that is consciously chosen to reflect the organization’s explicit strategic goals for the procurement.

![A sophisticated modular apparatus, likely a Prime RFQ component, showcases high-fidelity execution capabilities. Its interconnected sections, featuring a central glowing intelligence layer, suggest a robust RFQ protocol engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-core-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-protocols.jpg)

## References

- Doloi, H. Gallego, G. G. & Sadeghi, M. (2012). A study of the price-quality trade-off in public-private partnership procurements. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138 (12), 1400-1408.

- Korn, R. & Korn, E. (2005). The RFP Process ▴ Effective Management of the Acquisition of Library Systems. Information Today, Inc.

- Schotanus, F. & Telgen, J. (2007). Developing a framework for a procurement strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 36 (2), 235-245.

- Cheaitou, A. & Al-Marzouqi, A. H. (2019). A framework for supplier selection based on AHP-TOPSIS and value engineering. Benchmarking ▴ An International Journal, 26 (7), 2119-2141.

- Ho, W. Xu, X. & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202 (1), 16-24.

- Purdy, M. (2013). What is the Appropriate Weighting of Price in the Selection Process?. Mike Purdy’s Public Contracting Blog.

- Responsive. (2021). A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples. Responsive.

- Gatekeeper. (2019). RFP Evaluation Guide 3 – How to evaluate and score supplier proposals. Gatekeeper.

![A futuristic, metallic sphere, the Prime RFQ engine, anchors two intersecting blade-like structures. These symbolize multi-leg spread strategies and precise algorithmic execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-for-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-in-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Reflection

![A central dark aperture, like a precision matching engine, anchors four intersecting algorithmic pathways. Light-toned planes represent transparent liquidity pools, contrasting with dark teal sections signifying dark pool or latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-9.jpg)

## The Evaluation System as a Mirror of Strategy

Ultimately, the architecture of an RFP evaluation for a complex service holds a mirror to the procuring organization. The weights assigned, the criteria selected, and the rubrics developed are not merely administrative tools; they are tangible expressions of corporate strategy, risk appetite, and organizational priorities. A meticulously designed evaluation system forces a level of internal clarity that might otherwise remain elusive.

It compels stakeholders to move beyond vague desires for “quality” or “innovation” and to define these concepts in specific, measurable terms. The process of building the evaluation framework is, in itself, a valuable strategic exercise.

The final score that emerges from this system should not be viewed as an absolute truth, but as the most logical conclusion derived from the premises the organization itself has established. If the outcome feels wrong ▴ if the winning bidder seems misaligned with the intuitive sense of what is needed ▴ it is a signal that the evaluation system, and by extension the underlying strategic assumptions, may require refinement. The true power of this approach lies not in finding a single, magical price weighting, but in creating a durable, transparent, and adaptable system for making high-stakes decisions. This system becomes a core competency, a way of ensuring that every significant procurement decision is a direct and deliberate step toward achieving the organization’s most important goals.

![A central metallic bar, representing an RFQ block trade, pivots through translucent geometric planes symbolizing dynamic liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. This illustrates a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing private quotation workflows](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-facilitating-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-optimal-capital-efficiency-within-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, reflective surface features a segmented circular mechanism, reminiscent of an RFQ aggregation engine or liquidity pool. Specks suggest market microstructure dynamics or data latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-options-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Price Weighting

Meaning ▴ Price Weighting, within financial indices or portfolio construction in crypto investing, refers to a methodology where the influence or allocation of each underlying asset is determined by its current market price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-service-level-agreements-slas-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process-for-a-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular translucent teal structures intersect on a smooth base, reflecting light against a deep blue sphere. This embodies RFQ Protocol architecture, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dynamic-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Complex Service

The SLA's role in RFP evaluation is to translate vendor promises into a quantifiable framework for assessing operational risk and value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract depiction of an advanced institutional trading system, featuring a prominent sensor for real-time price discovery and an intelligence layer. Visible circuitry signifies algorithmic trading capabilities, low-latency execution, and robust FIX protocol integration for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-high-fidelity-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Bid Price

Meaning ▴ In crypto markets, the bid price represents the highest price a buyer is willing to pay for a specific cryptocurrency or derivative contract at a given moment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two high-gloss, white cylindrical execution channels with dark, circular apertures and secure bolted flanges, representing robust institutional-grade infrastructure for digital asset derivatives. These conduits facilitate precise RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution within a proprietary Prime RFQ environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-execution-channels-enabling-private-quotation-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-on-prime-os.jpg)

## Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Meaning ▴ Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) refers to a systematic and rigorous framework comprising various methodologies specifically designed to evaluate and compare alternative options based on multiple, often inherently conflicting, criteria to facilitate complex decision-making processes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-price-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, interconnected metallic components with glowing blue accents depict a sophisticated institutional trading platform. A central element and button signify high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Non-Price Factors

Meaning ▴ Non-price factors represent qualitative and quantitative attributes, other than direct cost, that influence decision-making in procurement, particularly within crypto systems and services. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract image visualizes a central Crypto Derivatives OS hub, precisely managing institutional trading workflows. Sharp, intersecting planes represent RFQ protocols extending to liquidity pools for options trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation is the systematic and objective process of assessing and comparing the proposals submitted by various vendors in response to a Request for Proposal, with the ultimate goal of identifying the most suitable solution or service provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular system with beige and mint green components connected by a central blue cross-shaped element, illustrating an institutional-grade RFQ execution engine. This sophisticated architecture facilitates high-fidelity execution, enabling efficient price discovery for multi-leg spreads and optimizing capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ framework for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-prime-os-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost represents the aggregated sum of all expenditures incurred in a specific process, project, or acquisition, encompassing both direct and indirect financial outlays. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/value-for-money/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision instrument with multi-layered dial, symbolizing price discovery and volatility surface calibration. Its metallic arm signifies an algorithmic trading engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for RFQ block trades, minimizing slippage within an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-calibrating-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Value for Money

Meaning ▴ Value for Money is an evaluation criterion that assesses whether goods, services, or investments achieve the optimal balance of cost, quality, and suitability for their intended purpose. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-solution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, circular, metallic-toned device features a central, highly reflective spherical element, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and implied volatility for Bitcoin options. This private quotation interface within a Prime RFQ platform enables high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, minimizing information leakage and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub.jpg)

## Technical Solution

Meaning ▴ A Technical Solution refers to a specific system, software application, or architectural design implemented to address a defined operational problem or fulfill a requirement. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/implementation-plan/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting geometric planes symbolize complex market microstructure and aggregated liquidity. A central nexus represents an RFQ hub for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-optimisation.jpg)

## Implementation Plan

Meaning ▴ An Implementation Plan is a precise, actionable roadmap that outlines the steps, resources, timelines, and responsibilities necessary to execute a project or deploy a system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric, within the operational framework of crypto institutional investing, is a precisely structured evaluation tool that delineates clear criteria and corresponding performance levels for rigorously assessing proposals, vendors, or internal projects related to critical digital asset infrastructure, advanced trading systems, or specialized service providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated internal mechanism of a split sphere reveals the core of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol. Polished surfaces reflect intricate components, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery within digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

## Quality Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central Principal OS hub with four radiating pathways illustrates high-fidelity execution across diverse institutional digital asset derivatives liquidity pools. Glowing lines signify low latency RFQ protocol routing for optimal price discovery, navigating market microstructure for multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-intelligence.jpg)

## Price Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a>

**Tags:** [Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/), [Supplier Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-selection/), [Bid Price](https://options.greeks.live/area/bid-price/), [Implementation Plan](https://options.greeks.live/area/implementation-plan/), [RFP Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/), [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [In What Scenarios Might a Price-Centric Rfp Evaluation Be More Appropriate than a Value-Driven One?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-scenarios-might-a-price-centric-rfp-evaluation-be-more-appropriate-than-a-value-driven-one/)
![Two semi-transparent, curved elements, one blueish, one greenish, are centrally connected, symbolizing dynamic institutional RFQ protocols. This configuration suggests aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread constructions. The precision illustrates high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework, optimizing price discovery for digital asset derivatives, navigating complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-engine.jpg)

A price-centric RFP is optimal for procuring highly commoditized goods or services where specifications are absolute and performance variation is negligible.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls in Designing an Rfp Scoring Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-in-designing-an-rfp-scoring-rubric/)
![A beige Prime RFQ chassis features a glowing teal transparent panel, symbolizing an Intelligence Layer for high-fidelity execution. A clear tube, representing a private quotation channel, holds a precise instrument for algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-system-interface.jpg)

The most common pitfalls in designing an RFP scoring rubric stem from a failure to strategically align weighting with project value and to implement clear, objective criteria, leading to biased and indefensible selection outcomes.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Setting Weights for Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-setting-weights-for-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool. This depicts high-fidelity execution of block trades through RFQ protocols in complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

A robust RFP evaluation system translates strategic intent into a defensible decision by weighting criteria to reflect true value over initial cost.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Vendor Evaluation Criteria between a Collaborative and Traditional Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-vendor-evaluation-criteria-between-a-collaborative-and-traditional-rfp/)
![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures. Robust design ensures high-fidelity execution, capital efficiency, and counterparty risk mitigation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

Collaborative RFPs evaluate a vendor's potential as a long-term innovation partner, while traditional RFPs assess compliance with predefined, cost-centric specifications.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Method for Weighting Rfp Evaluation Criteria to Reflect Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-method-for-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/)
![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution. It highlights High-Fidelity Execution, Atomic Settlement, and Capital Efficiency within a Principal's Operational Framework for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

A weighted scoring model is the most effective method for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible RFP decision.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Price in an Rfp Evaluation to Avoid Compromising Quality?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-price-in-an-rfp-evaluation-to-avoid-compromising-quality/)
![Intersecting translucent aqua blades, etched with algorithmic logic, symbolize multi-leg spread strategies and high-fidelity execution. Positioned over a reflective disk representing a deep liquidity pool, this illustrates advanced RFQ protocols driving precise price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-algorithmic-execution-microstructure-for-price-discovery.jpg)

The optimal RFP price weight is a strategic calibration, typically 20-30%, that prioritizes long-term value over initial cost.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Elements of an Rfp Evaluation Criteria Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-elements-of-an-rfp-evaluation-criteria-matrix/)
![Intersecting multi-asset liquidity channels with an embedded intelligence layer define this precision-engineered framework. It symbolizes advanced institutional digital asset RFQ protocols, visualizing sophisticated market microstructure for high-fidelity execution, mitigating counterparty risk and enabling atomic settlement across crypto derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

An RFP evaluation matrix is a weighted scoring system that translates strategic priorities into objective, data-driven vendor selection.

- 
### [How Does the Weighting of Price in an Rfp Influence the Final Selection Outcome?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-weighting-of-price-in-an-rfp-influence-the-final-selection-outcome/)
![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

The weighting of price in an RFP acts as the core parameter in a decision system, dictating whether the outcome reflects true value or cost.

- 
### [How Does a Sponsor Ensure the Rfp Evaluation Criteria Align with Business Strategy?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-sponsor-ensure-the-rfp-evaluation-criteria-align-with-business-strategy/)
![A multi-layered device with translucent aqua dome and blue ring, on black. This represents an Institutional-Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for Digital Asset Derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution through optimized RFQ protocols, facilitating precise price discovery and leveraging deep market microstructure analysis for latent liquidity access.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

A sponsor aligns RFP criteria with business strategy by engineering a weighted evaluation model that translates strategic goals into measurable metrics.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Optimal Price Weighting to Use in a Complex Service Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-price-weighting-to-use-in-a-complex-service-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-price-weighting-to-use-in-a-complex-service-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Optimal Price Weighting to Use in a Complex Service Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The optimal price weighting in a complex service RFP is a dynamic output of a valuation system designed to reflect strategic priorities. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-price-weighting-to-use-in-a-complex-service-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T16:17:46+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-29T11:25:22+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "Two interconnected translucent structures with glowing internal components represent a cutting-edge institutional trading system. This Prime RFQ infrastructure is designed for high-throughput RFQ protocol processing, enabling precise Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. It minimizes Slippage and Latency, supporting complex Multi-Leg Spreads and optimizing Capital Efficiency. This system mitigates Counterparty Risk, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Best Execution within dynamic Market Microstructure, providing a robust Principal's Operational Framework for Alpha Generation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Bid Price",
        "Implementation Plan",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis",
        "Non-Price Factors",
        "Price Quality Trade-Off",
        "Price Weighting",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Weighted Scoring",
        "Risk-Adjusted Procurement",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Technical Solution",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Value for Money"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-price-weighting-to-use-in-a-complex-service-rfp/
