# What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Cost Criteria in a Complex Technology Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![Two sleek, distinct colored planes, teal and blue, intersect. Dark, reflective spheres at their cross-points symbolize critical price discovery nodes](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-liquidity.jpg)

![An Execution Management System module, with intelligence layer, integrates with a liquidity pool hub and RFQ protocol component. This signifies atomic settlement and high-fidelity execution within an institutional grade Prime RFQ, ensuring capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-orchestrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Concept

Determining the optimal weight for cost criteria within a complex technology Request for Proposal (RFP) is a foundational act of strategic definition. This allocation is the quantitative expression of an organization’s priorities, risk tolerance, and long-term vision. The percentage assigned to cost is a control lever, directly influencing the balance between immediate budgetary adherence and the pursuit of enduring operational value. A technology acquisition is not a simple purchase; it is the integration of a new functional capability into an existing corporate ecosystem.

Therefore, the weighting of its cost cannot be an arbitrary or standardized figure. It must be a calculated decision derived from a deep understanding of the technology’s intended role.

The core of the matter lies in recognizing that every technology procurement exists on a spectrum of strategic importance. At one end of this spectrum are commodity technologies, where products from different vendors are largely interchangeable and the primary differentiator is price. In such cases, a higher cost weighting is logical and defensible. At the opposite end are strategic platform acquisitions, where the technology will become a central nervous system for critical business operations.

For these, factors like scalability, security, [vendor viability](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and technical architecture hold immense weight, as a failure in any of these domains could introduce catastrophic operational risk and long-term financial drag, far outweighing any initial price advantage. The cost weight must descend as the strategic importance ascends.

> The process of assigning weight to cost is an exercise in defining value, forcing an organization to articulate what truly matters for a specific technological implementation.

This calibration is an act of profound corporate self-awareness. It compels stakeholders from finance, operations, and technology to engage in a critical dialogue, moving beyond departmental silos to forge a unified definition of success for the project. The number they arrive at for the cost weight is the codified output of this strategic alignment.

It dictates the very nature of the evaluation, guiding the selection committee toward a decision that reflects a holistic understanding of value rather than a narrow fixation on the initial invoice. A poorly calibrated cost weight can systematically lead to suboptimal outcomes, either by overpaying for a commoditized solution or by selecting a low-cost offering that introduces unacceptable levels of long-term risk and technical debt.

![The abstract image visualizes a central Crypto Derivatives OS hub, precisely managing institutional trading workflows. Sharp, intersecting planes represent RFQ protocols extending to liquidity pools for options trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution.jpg)

![A precise RFQ engine extends into an institutional digital asset liquidity pool, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and advanced price discovery within complex market microstructure. This embodies a Principal's operational framework for multi-leg spread strategies and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-interfacing-core-liquidity-system.jpg)

## Strategy

A robust strategy for weighting cost in a [technology RFP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) moves beyond intuition and establishes a structured, defensible framework. The objective is to create a system where the final [vendor selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the logical output of the organization’s stated goals. This requires adopting a multi-criteria decision-making model that can handle the complexity and trade-offs inherent in any significant technology procurement. The choice of model itself is a strategic decision, reflecting the organization’s maturity in procurement and the specific nature of the technology being acquired.

![A metallic cylindrical component, suggesting robust Prime RFQ infrastructure, interacts with a luminous teal-blue disc representing a dynamic liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives. A precise golden bar diagonally traverses, symbolizing an RFQ-driven block trade path, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure for institutional grade operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg)

## Frameworks for Valuation

Several established methodologies provide the structural integrity needed for this process. Each offers a different lens through which to view the interplay of cost and value. The selection of a framework should be a conscious choice, aligned with the complexity of the RFP.

- **Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)** ▴ This is the most straightforward model, where criteria are assigned weights that sum to 100%. Each vendor’s proposal is scored against each criterion, and a final [weighted score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is calculated. While easy to implement and explain, its primary limitation is the assumption of independence between criteria, which is seldom true in complex technology evaluations. For instance, a vendor’s superior technical architecture might directly reduce long-term maintenance costs, a dependency SAW does not inherently model.

- **[Analytical Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytical-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([AHP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite))** ▴ AHP provides a more sophisticated framework for handling complex decisions. It structures the problem into a hierarchy, starting with the overall goal (e.g. “Select Best Cloud Infrastructure Provider”), followed by criteria (Cost, Security, Performance), and sub-criteria (e.g. under Cost ▴ Licensing Fees, Implementation Costs, Support Costs). Evaluators perform pairwise comparisons at each level, judging the relative importance of one criterion over another. This process reduces cognitive load and surfaces inconsistencies in judgment. The resulting weights are often more nuanced and reflective of true priorities. AHP is particularly effective when criteria are subjective and require expert judgment.

- **[Best Value Procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This approach explicitly separates cost from technical merit. Proposals might first be required to meet a minimum technical threshold to be considered “compliant.” Among the compliant proposals, a formula is then used to determine the best value. One common method is to divide the total price by the technical score to get a “cost per technical point.” The vendor with the lowest cost per point wins. This method ensures a baseline of quality while still allowing cost to be a significant determinant.

![Intricate core of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcasing precision platters symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and a high-fidelity execution arm. This depicts robust principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocol processing and market microstructure for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-execution-system.jpg)

## The Total Cost of Ownership Mandate

A pivotal strategic shift is the evolution from evaluating “price” to evaluating “[Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” (TCO). Price is a single data point representing the initial acquisition cost. TCO is a comprehensive financial model that encompasses all costs incurred throughout the technology’s lifecycle. A focus on TCO fundamentally alters the composition of the “cost” criterion itself, making it a far more meaningful and strategic evaluation factor.

> Focusing on Total Cost of Ownership transforms the cost discussion from a short-term budget exercise into a long-term financial forecast.

A proper [TCO analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) forces a level of diligence that uncovers hidden expenses that can dwarf the initial purchase price. This analysis is a strategic tool for risk mitigation.

### Table 1 ▴ Price vs. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

| Cost Component | Included in Price Analysis | Included in TCO Analysis | Strategic Implication |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial Purchase/License | Yes | Yes | The most visible but often misleading component of total cost. |
| Implementation & Integration | No | Yes | Complex systems may require extensive professional services, significantly increasing initial outlay. |
| Data Migration | No | Yes | A critical and often underestimated cost, especially for legacy system replacement. |
| User Training | No | Yes | Poor user adoption due to inadequate training can negate the technology’s value proposition. |
| Ongoing Maintenance & Support | No | Yes | Annual support contracts can represent a significant recurring expense, varying widely between vendors. |
| Infrastructure Requirements | No | Yes | Costs for necessary hardware upgrades, cloud hosting, or network improvements. |
| Decommissioning & Transition | No | Yes | The future cost of migrating off the platform must be considered as part of its lifecycle. |

![Polished metallic disc on an angled spindle represents a Principal's operational framework. This engineered system ensures high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## Calibrating the Weight Based on Strategic Role

The final strategic element is to map the cost weighting to the technology’s role within the organization. This prevents the application of a one-size-fits-all percentage across disparate procurements.

A useful construct is the Technology Role Matrix. This matrix classifies acquisitions based on two axes ▴ Operational Criticality and Market Differentiation.

- **Operational Criticality** ▴ How essential is this technology to the core revenue-generating or operational functions of the business?

- **Market Differentiation** ▴ How much competitive advantage or uniqueness does this technology provide?

By plotting a technology on this matrix, an organization can derive a defensible range for its cost weighting. For instance, a new email client is low on both axes (a utility), suggesting a high cost weight is appropriate. A proprietary algorithmic trading platform, conversely, is high on both axes (a strategic weapon), demanding that factors like performance, latency, and innovation be weighted far more heavily than cost.

![Precision-engineered modular components, with transparent elements and metallic conduits, depict a robust RFQ Protocol engine. This architecture facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling efficient liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a weighted [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for a complex technology RFP requires a disciplined, multi-stage process. This is where strategic theory is translated into operational reality. The integrity of the final decision rests entirely on the rigor and transparency of the execution phase. It involves establishing the evaluation architecture, building the quantitative models, and pressure-testing the results through realistic scenarios.

![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighting and Scoring

A structured sequence of operations ensures that the evaluation process is fair, consistent, and auditable. This playbook should be established before the RFP is released to vendors.

- **Form the Evaluation Committee** ▴ Assemble a cross-functional team with representatives from IT, Finance, Legal, and the primary business units that will use the technology. A minimum of three to five members is recommended to ensure a diversity of perspectives and to avoid bias.

- **Define and Categorize Criteria** ▴ Brainstorm all possible evaluation criteria. Group these into logical, high-level categories. A typical structure for a technology RFP includes:

<li>**Functional Requirements** ▴ How well the solution meets the specified business needs.

- **Technical Requirements** ▴ Aspects like architecture, scalability, security, and integration capabilities.

- **Vendor Viability** ▴ The vendor’s financial stability, track record, support quality, and product roadmap.

- **[Total Cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of Ownership** ▴ A comprehensive assessment of all lifecycle costs.

</li>
- **Assign Category Weights** ▴ The committee must now debate and agree upon the weight for each high-level category. This is the most critical strategic decision in the process. Using a facilitated workshop and a method like pairwise comparison from AHP can help build consensus. For a complex CRM platform, the weights might be ▴ Functional (30%), Technical (30%), Vendor Viability (20%), and TCO (20%). For a more commoditized data storage solution, the weighting might shift to ▴ Functional (25%), Technical (25%), Vendor Viability (10%), and TCO (40%).

- **Assign Sub-Criteria Weights** ▴ Within each category, assign weights to the specific line-item criteria. For example, within the “Technical Requirements” category (weighted at 30% overall), “Data Security” might be assigned 40% of the category’s weight, giving it an effective total weight of 12% (30% 40%).

- **Develop a Scoring Rubric** ▴ For each criterion, define what each score on the scale (e.g. 1-5) means. A scoring rubric removes subjectivity. For “Quality of Support,” a score of 1 might be “Email support only, 48-hour response,” while a 5 is “24/7 phone support with dedicated account manager, 1-hour response SLA.”

- **Conduct Independent Scoring** ▴ Each committee member evaluates the vendor proposals independently, without conferring with others. This prevents groupthink and ensures that the initial scores are based on individual, expert assessment.

- **Hold a Consensus Meeting** ▴ The committee convenes to review the scores. Where significant discrepancies exist between evaluators, a discussion is held. Evaluators can adjust their scores based on the arguments presented, but they are not required to. The goal is to understand different perspectives, not to force unanimity.

- **Calculate Final Scores and Rank** ▴ The final scores are calculated automatically using a master spreadsheet or specialized RFP software. The vendor with the highest weighted score is the presumptive winner, pending final due diligence and contract negotiations.

![A sleek, illuminated object, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol or Execution Management System, precisely intersects two broad surfaces representing liquidity pools within market microstructure. Its glowing line indicates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives, ensuring best execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-price-discovery-alpha-generation.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The core of the execution phase is the quantitative model. A well-structured scoring matrix is the primary tool for this analysis. The following table demonstrates how different cost weights can alter the outcome of an evaluation for a hypothetical Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system.

> A quantitative scoring model does not make the decision; it illuminates the logical consequences of the strategic weights set by the organization.

### Table 2 ▴ Hypothetical ERP Vendor Scoring Matrix

| Criteria (Weight) | Vendor A Score (1-10) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (1-10) | Vendor B Weighted Score | Vendor C Score (1-10) | Vendor C Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Functional Fit (35%) | 9 | 3.15 | 7 | 2.45 | 8 | 2.80 |
| Technical Architecture (25%) | 8 | 2.00 | 9 | 2.25 | 6 | 1.50 |
| Vendor Viability (20%) | 7 | 1.40 | 9 | 1.80 | 8 | 1.60 |
| Cost (TCO) (20%) | 6 (Higher TCO) | 1.20 | 8 (Lower TCO) | 1.60 | 9 (Lowest TCO) | 1.80 |
| Total Score | | 7.75 | | 8.10 | | 7.70 |

In the scenario above, with cost weighted at 20%, Vendor B wins. Vendor B presents the best overall value proposition, with strong technical and viability scores offsetting a slightly lower [functional fit](https://prime.greeks.live/area/functional-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Now, consider the same scores but with a different strategic priority where cost is paramount.

If the committee had decided this was a less strategic, more cost-sensitive procurement and set the weights as Functional (25%), Technical (15%), Vendor Viability (10%), and Cost (50%), the outcome would shift dramatically.

- **Vendor A Final Score** ▴ (9 0.25) + (8 0.15) + (7 0.10) + (6 0.50) = 2.25 + 1.20 + 0.70 + 3.00 = **7.15**

- **Vendor B Final Score** ▴ (7 0.25) + (9 0.15) + (9 0.10) + (8 0.50) = 1.75 + 1.35 + 0.90 + 4.00 = **8.00**

- **Vendor C Final Score** ▴ (8 0.25) + (6 0.15) + (8 0.10) + (9 0.50) = 2.00 + 0.90 + 0.80 + 4.50 = **8.20**

Under this new weighting scheme, Vendor C, the cheapest option, now becomes the winner. This quantitative exercise demonstrates that the work of selecting a vendor is accomplished during the weighting discussion, not during the scoring. The scoring process is merely the mathematical conclusion of the strategy.

![A multi-layered electronic system, centered on a precise circular module, visually embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It represents the intricate market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, driven by an intelligence layer facilitating algorithmic trading and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study

Let’s consider a realistic case. “Innovate Pharma,” a mid-sized pharmaceutical company, issued an RFP for a new Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). The system was critical for R&D data integrity and regulatory compliance. The evaluation committee consisted of the Head of R&D, the CIO, a senior lab manager, a procurement officer, and a quality assurance director.

After intense debate, they settled on the following weights ▴ Functional Fit (40%), Technical & Security (30%), Vendor Viability & Support (20%), and TCO (10%). The extremely low weight on cost was a deliberate strategic choice, reflecting the catastrophic financial and reputational risk of a system failure or data breach. They were explicitly choosing to prioritize performance and security over budget.

Two vendors made the shortlist. “LabSystems Inc.” was the industry leader, with a premium-priced but feature-rich, validated solution. Their TCO was high.

“BioSoft Solutions” was a newer, more agile company with a modern, cloud-native platform at a significantly lower price point. Their TCO was 30% lower than LabSystems.

During the scoring, LabSystems scored a 9/10 on Functional Fit and Vendor Viability, but a 6/10 on TCO. BioSoft scored a 7/10 on Functional Fit, an 8/10 on Technical (due to its modern architecture), but only a 6/10 on Vendor Viability, as they were a smaller, less established company. They scored a 9/10 on TCO.

The final calculation was:

- **LabSystems Inc.** ▴ (9 0.40) + (8 0.30) + (9 0.20) + (6 0.10) = 3.6 + 2.4 + 1.8 + 0.6 = **8.4**

- **BioSoft Solutions** ▴ (7 0.40) + (8 0.30) + (6 0.20) + (9 0.10) = 2.8 + 2.4 + 1.2 + 0.9 = **7.3**

Despite the significantly lower cost of the BioSoft solution, LabSystems was the clear winner. The committee’s final report to the CFO did not hide from the higher cost. Instead, it used the scoring model to provide a data-driven justification.

The report demonstrated that the premium paid for the LabSystems solution was a deliberate investment in reducing regulatory risk and ensuring long-term operational stability, a value that the company’s own strategic weighting process had deemed to be worth the price. The low cost weight functioned as a strategic guardrail, preventing the allure of short-term savings from overriding the long-term mission-critical requirements.

![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Bhutta, Khurrum S. and Faizul Huq. “Supplier selection problem ▴ a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process.” _Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal_, vol. 7, no. 3, 2002, pp. 126-135.

- Ghodsypour, S. H. and C. O’Brien. “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming.” _International Journal of Production Economics_, vol. 56-57, 1998, pp. 199-212.

- Narasimhan, Ram. “An analytical approach to supplier selection.” _Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management_, vol. 19, no. 4, 1983, pp. 27-32.

- Ellram, Lisa M. “The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships.” _Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management_, vol. 26, no. 4, 1990, pp. 8-14.

- Ferrin, Bruce G. and Richard E. Plank. “Total cost of ownership models ▴ a case study and research opportunities.” _Journal of Business Logistics_, vol. 23, no. 2, 2002, pp. 135-156.

- Kar, A. K. “A hybrid group decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy set theory and neural networks.” _Journal of Computational Science_, vol. 6, 2015, pp. 23-33.

- Monczka, Robert M. et al. _Purchasing and Supply Chain Management_. Cengage Learning, 2015.

- Weber, Charles A. John R. Current, and W. C. Benton. “Vendor selection criteria and methods.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 50, no. 1, 1991, pp. 2-18.

- Timmerman, E. “An approach to vendor performance evaluation.” _Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management_, vol. 22, no. 4, 1986, pp. 2-8.

![An abstract, multi-component digital infrastructure with a central lens and circuit patterns, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives platform. This Prime RFQ enables High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol, optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading, Price Discovery, and Multi-Leg Spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-powering-high-fidelity-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocol-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Reflection

![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## From Procurement Tactic to Strategic Instrument

The process of calibrating cost within a technology RFP evaluation is ultimately an act of organizational introspection. It transforms the procurement function from a tactical, cost-minimizing center into a strategic instrument for value creation. The final weighting is a concise policy statement, declaring to the market and to internal stakeholders what the organization values most in its technological partners and platforms. It is the mechanism by which abstract strategic goals ▴ like innovation, security, or long-term scalability ▴ are given tangible, mathematical force in a critical business decision.

Viewing the [RFP weighting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process through this lens elevates the conversation. It is no longer about finding the cheapest vendor that meets a minimum set of requirements. It becomes a structured methodology for investing in the organization’s future capabilities.

The rigor of a TCO analysis and the structured logic of a framework like AHP provide a defensible, data-driven foundation for what would otherwise be a subjective and politically charged decision. The resulting choice is not just a purchase; it is the calculated acquisition of a strategic asset, with its cost properly contextualized within its total expected contribution to the enterprise.

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Vendor Viability

Meaning ▴ Vendor Viability defines the comprehensive assessment of a technology provider's enduring capacity to deliver and sustain critical services for institutional operations, particularly within the demanding context of institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, bi-component digital asset derivatives engine reveals its intricate core, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol. This Prime RFQ component enables high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure, managing latent liquidity for institutional operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Vendor Selection

Meaning ▴ Vendor Selection defines the systematic, analytical process undertaken by an institutional entity to identify, evaluate, and onboard third-party service providers for critical technological and operational components within its digital asset derivatives infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Technology Rfp

Meaning ▴ A Technology Request for Proposal (RFP) is a formal, structured solicitation document issued by an institution to prospective technology vendors, inviting them to submit detailed proposals for the provision of specific systems, software, or services. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished spherical form representing a Prime Brokerage platform features a precisely engineered RFQ engine. This mechanism facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling private quotation and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytical-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Analytical Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytical Hierarchy Process is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, particularly those involving multiple criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Ahp

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured decision-making framework, systematically organizing complex problems into a hierarchical structure of goals, criteria, and alternatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic control mechanism with a luminous teal-accented sphere symbolizes high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its robust design represents Prime RFQ infrastructure enabling RFQ protocols for optimal price discovery, liquidity aggregation, and low-latency connectivity in algorithmic trading environments](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-control-for-optimal-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Best Value Procurement

Meaning ▴ Best Value Procurement defines a strategic acquisition methodology focused on optimizing long-term system performance and total cost of ownership rather than solely minimizing initial capital outlay. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise metallic central hub with sharp, grey angular blades signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing. Intersecting transparent teal planes represent layered liquidity pools and multi-leg spread structures, illustrating complex market microstructure for efficient price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-across-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Tco Analysis

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis is a comprehensive financial framework designed to quantify all direct and indirect costs associated with an asset, system, or solution across its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two high-gloss, white cylindrical execution channels with dark, circular apertures and secure bolted flanges, representing robust institutional-grade infrastructure for digital asset derivatives. These conduits facilitate precise RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution within a proprietary Prime RFQ environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-execution-channels-enabling-private-quotation-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-on-prime-os.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Model represents a structured quantitative framework designed to assign a numerical value or rank to an entity, such as a digital asset, counterparty, or transaction, based on a predefined set of weighted criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost quantifies the comprehensive expenditure incurred across the entire lifecycle of a financial transaction, encompassing both explicit and implicit components. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/functional-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central hub with four radiating arms embodies an RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies. A teal sphere signifies deep liquidity for underlying assets](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimal-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Functional Fit

Meaning ▴ Functional Fit defines the precise alignment between a specific institutional trading objective or operational requirement and the inherent capabilities of a selected system, protocol, or execution strategy within the digital asset derivatives landscape. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Stacked, multi-colored discs symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol's layered architecture for Digital Asset Derivatives. This embodies a Prime RFQ enabling high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread trading and capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Weighting

Meaning ▴ RFP weighting represents the quantitative assignment of relative importance to specific evaluation criteria within a Request for Proposal process. </a>

**Tags:** [Best Value Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-value-procurement/), [Total Cost](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost/), [Vendor Viability](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/), [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/), [Technology RFP](https://options.greeks.live/area/technology-rfp/), [Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Best Practice for Weighting Technical versus Cost Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-practice-for-weighting-technical-versus-cost-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![A precision-engineered control mechanism, featuring a ribbed dial and prominent green indicator, signifies Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ Protocol optimization. This represents High-Fidelity Execution, Price Discovery, and Volatility Surface calibration for Algorithmic Trading. The central indicator suggests Atomic Settlement within a Prime RFQ Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operational-framework-precision-calibration-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os-and-volatility-surface-optimization.jpg)

The optimal weighting of technical versus cost criteria is a dynamic calibration that reflects the procurement's strategic value.

- 
### [How Does the Correlation between Rfp Criteria Affect the Validity of a Sensitivity Analysis?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-correlation-between-rfp-criteria-affect-the-validity-of-a-sensitivity-analysis/)
![A diagonal composition contrasts a blue intelligence layer, symbolizing market microstructure and volatility surface, with a metallic, precision-engineered execution engine. This depicts high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Correlated RFP criteria invalidate a sensitivity analysis by creating a biased model, turning the analysis into a confirmation of that bias.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Modeling Total Cost of Ownership in a Private Sector Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-modeling-total-cost-of-ownership-in-a-private-sector-rfp/)
![Glossy, intersecting forms in beige, blue, and teal embody RFQ protocol efficiency, atomic settlement, and aggregated liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sleek design reflects high-fidelity execution, prime brokerage capabilities, and optimized order book dynamics for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-principal-operational-frameworks.jpg)

A comprehensive TCO model in an RFP quantifies the full lifecycle cost of an asset, enabling strategic, value-based procurement decisions.

- 
### [What Is the Role of Strategic Alignment and Profitability Filters in a Data-Driven Rfp Decision Framework?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-strategic-alignment-and-profitability-filters-in-a-data-driven-rfp-decision-framework/)
![A multi-layered device with translucent aqua dome and blue ring, on black. This represents an Institutional-Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for Digital Asset Derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution through optimized RFQ protocols, facilitating precise price discovery and leveraging deep market microstructure analysis for latent liquidity access.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

A data-driven RFP framework uses strategic alignment and profitability filters to ensure acquisitions directly support long-term goals.

- 
### [What Is the Relationship between RFP Weighting and Long-Term Total Cost of Ownership?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-rfp-weighting-and-long-term-total-cost-of-ownership/)
![Two diagonal cylindrical elements. The smooth upper mint-green pipe signifies optimized RFQ protocols and private quotation streams. The distressed lower pipe, marked by splatters and cracks, represents market microstructure complexities, reflecting slippage, adverse selection, and transaction costs during high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-optimization-1.jpg)

RFP weighting dictates TCO by encoding strategic priorities into a selection model that determines future operational costs and risks.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight Distribution between Price and Qualitative Factors in a Strategic RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-distribution-between-price-and-qualitative-factors-in-a-strategic-rfp/)
![Intersecting opaque and luminous teal structures symbolize converging RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread execution. Surface droplets denote market microstructure granularity and slippage. This represents high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and minimizing latency in dark pool environments.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

The optimal RFP weight distribution is a dynamic calibration reflecting the procurement's strategic value and risk profile.

- 
### [What Are the Key Steps to Implementing an Automated RFP Evaluation Workflow?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-steps-to-implementing-an-automated-rfp-evaluation-workflow/)
![Sleek, futuristic metallic components showcase a dark, reflective dome encircled by a textured ring, representing a Volatility Surface for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ architecture enables High-Fidelity Execution and Private Quotation via RFQ Protocols for Block Trade liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-price-discovery.jpg)

Automated RFP evaluation operationalizes procurement, transforming subjective inputs into a defensible, data-driven selection architecture.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Weight RFP Scoring Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-weight-rfp-scoring-criteria/)
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sphere embodies a block trade or private quotation via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

The most effective RFP weighting method transforms procurement into a strategic exercise by creating a data-driven value model.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Weight Evaluation Criteria for a Complex Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-evaluation-criteria-for-a-complex-rfp/)
![A central metallic bar, representing an RFQ block trade, pivots through translucent geometric planes symbolizing dynamic liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. This illustrates a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing private quotation workflows.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-facilitating-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-optimal-capital-efficiency-within-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

Effective RFP criteria weighting transforms subjective priorities into a quantifiable, defensible system for optimal vendor selection.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Cost Criteria in a Complex Technology Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-cost-criteria-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-cost-criteria-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Cost Criteria in a Complex Technology Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The optimal cost weight in a technology RFP is a calibrated output of strategic priority, inversely proportional to the system's operational criticality. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-cost-criteria-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T10:58:50+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T10:58:57+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-architecture.jpg",
        "caption": "A detailed rendering of an advanced financial technology system, featuring interconnected transparent and opaque cylindrical modules. This architecture embodies a principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives, specifically enabling robust RFQ protocol execution. Its intricate internal mechanisms and glowing pathways illustrate high-frequency trading and algorithmic trading for multi-leg spread strategies. The central connecting element signifies atomic settlement and price discovery, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution within digital asset markets."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AHP",
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Analytical Hierarchy Process",
        "Best Value Procurement",
        "Functional Fit",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "RFP Weighting",
        "Scoring Model",
        "Strategic Procurement",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "TCO Analysis",
        "Technology Evaluation",
        "Technology RFP",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Vendor Viability"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-cost-criteria-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/
