# What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Price in a Complex Rfp Scoring Model? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A refined object featuring a translucent teal element, symbolizing a dynamic RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precision embodies High-Fidelity Execution and seamless Price Discovery within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-for-optimal-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![Four sleek, rounded, modular components stack, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. Each unit represents a critical Prime RFQ layer, facilitating high-fidelity execution, aggregated inquiry, and sophisticated market microstructure for optimal price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-institutional-crypto-derivatives-trading-system-components.jpg)

## Concept

Determining the optimal weight for price within a complex Request for Proposal (RFP) [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is an exercise in strategic definition, not a search for a universal constant. The inquiry itself presupposes a static answer, a fixed percentage that guarantees the best outcome. The reality of sophisticated procurement, however, is that the price variable’s significance is a direct reflection of an organization’s deepest [strategic priorities](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), its tolerance for risk, and the intrinsic nature of the asset or service being acquired. The weight assigned to price is the quantitative expression of a company’s operational philosophy.

A procurement process engineered for strategic advantage views the RFP as a mechanism for discovery, not just evaluation. It is a structured dialogue designed to uncover a supplier’s total capability and long-term value potential. Within this framework, price transforms from a simple monetary figure into one element of a much larger equation.

The core task is to architect a scoring model that accurately quantifies a proposal’s alignment with the organization’s comprehensive definition of value. This definition must encompass not only the initial acquisition cost but also the full spectrum of lifecycle expenses, performance metrics, and potential risks.

> The weight of price in an RFP model is not a number to be found, but a strategic value to be declared.

The pursuit of an “optimal” weight is therefore an internal journey before it is an external calculation. It requires a rigorous interrogation of the procurement’s objectives. Is the primary goal to minimize immediate capital outlay for a commoditized item, where performance variables are standardized and differentiation is minimal? Or is the objective to secure a long-term strategic partner for a critical, complex system where innovation, service reliability, and technical integration are paramount?

The answer to this foundational question dictates the architecture of the scoring model. An overemphasis on price in a complex technology acquisition can lead to a decision that is financially sound in the short term but operationally catastrophic over the asset’s lifecycle. Conversely, underemphasizing price in a simple commodity purchase introduces unnecessary expense. The system must be calibrated to the specific context of the decision.

This leads to a fundamental principle ▴ the scoring model is a system of measurement, and like any precise instrument, it must be calibrated to measure what truly matters. The weightings are the calibration settings. They focus the evaluation on the criteria that drive success for that specific procurement. Price is always a factor, but its dominance or subordination within the model is a deliberate strategic choice.

The most effective procurement functions build models that are both robust and flexible, capable of adapting their weighting structures to reflect the unique strategic intent of each major sourcing event. The optimal weight, therefore, is contextual, dynamic, and a clear articulation of corporate strategy in numerical form.

![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

![Intersecting translucent aqua blades, etched with algorithmic logic, symbolize multi-leg spread strategies and high-fidelity execution. Positioned over a reflective disk representing a deep liquidity pool, this illustrates advanced RFQ protocols driving precise price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-algorithmic-execution-microstructure-for-price-discovery.jpg)

## Strategy

![A sharp, multi-faceted crystal prism, embodying price discovery and high-fidelity execution, rests on a structured, fan-like base. This depicts dynamic liquidity pools and intricate market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, powered by an intelligence layer for private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-execution.jpg)

## From Price Tag to Lifecycle Value

The strategic evolution in procurement is the migration from evaluating purchase price to assessing [Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([TCO](https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)). This framework fundamentally redefines the “price” component of an RFP evaluation. Instead of a single bid number, TCO provides a comprehensive financial model that encapsulates the entire lifecycle of a product or service.

Adopting a TCO strategy means the evaluation model is no longer judging a snapshot in time but rather the total financial impact over a multi-year horizon. This systemic view is essential for complex acquisitions where post-purchase costs can dwarf the initial outlay.

A TCO model systematically categorizes costs into distinct phases, ensuring a holistic financial analysis. This structure provides a clear and defensible methodology for comparing suppliers on a true long-term value basis. The key is to move beyond the visible price tag and illuminate the often-hidden costs associated with ownership.

### Table 1 ▴ Core Components of a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Framework

| TCO Category | Description | Illustrative Cost Elements |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acquisition Costs | All initial, one-time costs associated with purchasing and implementing the product or service. | Purchase Price / Subscription Fees Taxes and Tariffs Shipping and Logistics Installation and Setup Fees Integration and Customization Costs Initial User Training |
| Operating Costs | The recurring costs required to use the product or service in its day-to-day function. | Energy Consumption Consumables (e.g. ink, spare parts) Software Licensing and Subscription Renewals Staffing and Labor Costs Ongoing Technical Support Fees |
| Maintenance & Support Costs | Costs related to ensuring the asset remains operational and effective over its lifecycle. | Preventive Maintenance Contracts Repair and Replacement Parts Costs of Downtime and Lost Productivity Warranty Extension Fees Helpdesk and Specialist Support |
| End-of-Life Costs | Costs incurred at the conclusion of the asset’s useful life. | Decommissioning and Removal Data Wiping and Security Procedures Recycling or Disposal Fees Contract Termination Penalties (Minus) Residual or Resale Value |

![A sleek, institutional grade sphere features a luminous circular display showcasing a stylized Earth, symbolizing global liquidity aggregation. This advanced Prime RFQ interface enables real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-displaying-global-liquidity-aggregation-and-real-time-price-discovery-for-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Architecting Decision Integrity with AHP

While TCO provides a robust financial foundation, complex RFPs involve numerous qualitative criteria that are difficult to weigh objectively. This is where the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([AHP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)) provides a superior strategic framework. AHP is a multi-criteria decision-making method that structures a complex problem into a hierarchy and uses pairwise comparisons to derive priority scales. This process introduces mathematical rigor to what can otherwise be a subjective and biased evaluation.

The core of the AHP strategy is to break down the decision into manageable parts ▴ the overall goal, the main criteria, sub-criteria, and the alternatives (suppliers). Decision-makers then compare the relative importance of each element at the same level. For example, they would not directly assign a weight to ‘Price’ and ‘Technical Quality’.

Instead, they would answer a more targeted question ▴ “How much more important is ‘Technical Quality’ than ‘Price’ for this specific procurement?” This comparison is made using a standardized numerical scale. This process is repeated for all pairs of criteria, creating a matrix of judgments.

> AHP transforms subjective stakeholder opinions into a mathematically consistent and defensible set of weights.

A key strategic advantage of AHP is its ability to measure and enforce logical consistency. The methodology includes a calculation for a Consistency Ratio (CR), which checks for contradictions in the pairwise judgments. A high CR indicates that the decision-makers’ judgments are inconsistent (e.g. stating A is more important than B, B is more important than C, but C is more important than A). This forces a re-evaluation of the comparisons, ensuring the final weights are logical and reliable.

By applying AHP, an organization can create a scoring model where the weights, including the weight of price, are not arbitrarily assigned but are the calculated result of a structured, rational, and transparent process. This provides an exceptionally strong defense against internal challenges or supplier protests.

![Translucent, overlapping geometric shapes symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation within an institutional grade RFQ protocol. Central elements represent the execution management system's focal point for precise price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread digital asset derivatives, revealing complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-driving-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-precise-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![Central reflective hub with radiating metallic rods and layered translucent blades. This visualizes an RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing the Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-dealer liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-management.jpg)

## Execution

![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Operationalizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Implementing the [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process requires a disciplined, systematic approach. The process moves from a high-level goal to granular supplier scores, with built-in validation at each stage. This operational playbook outlines the precise steps for executing an AHP-based RFP evaluation, ensuring that the final weighting of price is a direct, calculated output of the organization’s strategic intent.

- **Deconstruct the Decision into a Hierarchy**
The initial step is to structure the decision. This involves defining the layers of the evaluation model.

<li>**Level 1 ▴ The Goal.** This is the overarching objective, for instance, “Select the Optimal Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System.”

- **Level 2 ▴ Main Criteria.** These are the primary pillars of the decision. A typical structure might include ▴ [Total Cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of Ownership (TCO), Technical Platform, Implementation & Support, and [Vendor Viability](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- **Level 3 ▴ Sub-Criteria.** Each main criterion is broken down into more specific, measurable components. For example, ‘Technical Platform’ might be divided into ‘System Architecture,’ ‘Security Protocols,’ and ‘Integration Capabilities.’

- **Level 4 ▴ Alternatives.** These are the vendors (e.g. Supplier A, Supplier B, Supplier C) being evaluated.

</li>
- **Execute Pairwise Comparisons of Criteria**
A cross-functional team of stakeholders (e.g. from IT, Finance, Operations) evaluates the Level 2 criteria. Using Saaty’s 1-9 scale, they compare every possible pair of criteria to determine their relative importance for the specific procurement. For example, they answer questions like ▴ “Relative to the goal, is TCO more or less important than Technical Platform? And by how much?”

- **Calculate Priority Vectors and Consistency Ratio**
The judgments from the pairwise comparisons are entered into a matrix. Mathematical calculations are then performed to derive the priority vector, or the weight, for each criterion. Simultaneously, the Consistency Index (CI) and Consistency Ratio (CR) are calculated to validate the integrity of the judgments.
A CR of 0.10 or less is generally considered acceptable. If the CR is too high, the team must revisit their pairwise comparisons to resolve logical inconsistencies.

- **Score Alternatives Against Sub-Criteria**
The evaluation team scores each vendor’s proposal against the most granular sub-criteria. This is often done on a simple rating scale (e.g. 1-5 or 1-10), where objective data from the RFP responses is used to assign a score. For example, under the ‘Security Protocols’ sub-criterion, a vendor providing evidence of ISO 27001 certification might receive a higher score than one that does not.

- **Synthesize the Results for a Final Score**
The final step involves a series of multiplications. The score of each vendor on each sub-criterion is multiplied by the weight of that sub-criterion. These scores are then rolled up to the main criteria level and finally to the overall goal level. The result is a single, comprehensive score for each vendor, reflecting their performance against a set of criteria whose weights have been rigorously and consistently determined.

![A precision optical system with a reflective lens embodies the Prime RFQ intelligence layer. Gray and green planes represent divergent RFQ protocols or multi-leg spread strategies for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligent-core-driving-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools-for-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling a TCO-Driven Evaluation

The “price” component of the RFP is best represented by a full TCO analysis. This requires each vendor to provide detailed cost data, which is then modeled over the expected lifecycle of the solution. The table below illustrates a TCO comparison for a hypothetical five-year software contract, demonstrating how a lower acquisition cost can be misleading.

### Table 2 ▴ Comparative Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis (5-Year Horizon)

| Cost Component | Supplier A | Supplier B (Lowest Bid) | Supplier C |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Software Licensing (Year 1) | $250,000 | $180,000 | $280,000 |
| Implementation & Integration | $120,000 | $150,000 | $100,000 |
| Initial User Training | $30,000 | $50,000 | $25,000 |
| Annual Licensing (4 Years) | $400,000 | $480,000 | $360,000 |
| Annual Support & Maintenance | $100,000 | $200,000 | $80,000 |
| Required Hardware Upgrades | $0 | $75,000 | $20,000 |
| Estimated Annual Downtime Cost | $10,000 | $40,000 | $5,000 |
| Data Migration & Decommissioning | $20,000 | $35,000 | $15,000 |
| Total Cost of Ownership (5 Years) | $930,000 | $1,210,000 | $885,000 |

![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis the Impact of Weighting

To illustrate the critical importance of the weighting process, consider a simplified AHP model. A stakeholder committee has completed its pairwise comparisons for the main criteria, resulting in the weights shown below. The process confirmed a preference for technical quality and support over initial cost, yielding a TCO weight of 25.1%. This weight is not an arbitrary guess; it is the calculated outcome of their strategic priorities.

> Sensitivity analysis provides a predictive view into how the final decision shifts as strategic priorities are debated and adjusted.

We can now apply these weights to the normalized scores of three hypothetical suppliers. Supplier B, with the lowest TCO, performs poorly on the more heavily weighted technical and support criteria. Supplier A presents a more balanced profile, while Supplier C excels in the non-cost categories but has the highest TCO.

The final synthesis reveals Supplier A as the winner. This outcome is a direct result of the initial strategic decision to prioritize technical excellence over minimal cost.

A [sensitivity analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) becomes a powerful tool at this stage. By adjusting the weight of the TCO criterion, we can demonstrate its impact on the final outcome. For instance, if the committee were pressured to increase the importance of cost, raising the TCO weight to 45%, the ranking would shift, and Supplier B would become the winner.

This quantitative modeling allows the procurement team to have a data-driven conversation with stakeholders, showing precisely how a change in strategic priorities translates to a different procurement decision. It makes the trade-offs explicit and defensible.

### Table 3 ▴ AHP Synthesis and Sensitivity Analysis

| Criterion | AHP-Derived Weight | Supplier A Score (Normalized) | Supplier B Score (Normalized) | Supplier C Score (Normalized) | Supplier A Weighted Score | Supplier B Weighted Score | Supplier C Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Platform | 41.5% | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.95 | 0.353 | 0.249 | 0.404 |
| Implementation & Support | 33.4% | 0.90 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.301 | 0.184 | 0.267 |
| Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | 25.1% | 0.70 | 0.95 | 0.60 | 0.176 | 0.238 | 0.151 |
| Final Score | 100% | | | | 0.830 | 0.671 | 0.822 |
| Rank | | | | | 1 | 3 | 2 |

![Intersecting geometric planes symbolize complex market microstructure and aggregated liquidity. A central nexus represents an RFQ hub for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-optimisation.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Tahriri, Farzad, et al. “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company.” _Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management_, vol. 1, no. 2, 2008, pp. 54-76.

- Alsuwehri, Yaser N. “Supplier Evaluation and Selection by Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach.” _The University of Kansas_, 2011.

- Ghodsypour, S. H. and C. O’Brien. “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytical hierarchy process and linear programming.” _International Journal of Production Economics_, vol. 56-57, 1998, pp. 199-212.

- Weber, Charles A. et al. “Vendor selection criteria and methods.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 50, no. 1, 1991, pp. 2-18.

- Ellram, Lisa M. “Total cost of ownership ▴ a key concept in strategic cost management.” _Journal of Business Logistics_, vol. 14, no. 1, 1993, p. 45.

- Monczka, Robert M. et al. _Purchasing and Supply Chain Management_. Cengage Learning, 2015.

- Bhutta, Khurrum S. and Faizul Huq. “Supplier selection problem ▴ a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process.” _Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal_, vol. 7, no. 3, 2002, pp. 126-135.

- Vargas, Luis G. “An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 48, no. 1, 1990, pp. 2-8.

- Handfield, Robert, et al. “Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment ▴ A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 141, no. 1, 2002, pp. 70-87.

![Central axis with angular, teal forms, radiating transparent lines. Abstractly represents an institutional grade Prime RFQ execution engine for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated inquiries via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-price-discovery-volatility-surface-analytics.jpg)

## Reflection

![Abstract geometric forms in dark blue, beige, and teal converge around a metallic gear, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. A sleek bar extends, representing high-fidelity execution and precise delta hedging within a multi-leg spread framework, optimizing capital efficiency via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

## The Scoring Model as a Systemic Mirror

The architecture of an [RFP scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) does more than evaluate suppliers; it holds up a mirror to the organization itself. The weights assigned, the criteria selected, and the methodologies employed are all reflections of what the organization truly values. A model heavily skewed towards price reflects a culture focused on immediate cost containment.

A model balanced with technical, service, and risk criteria reflects a culture of long-term partnership and operational resilience. The process of building the model, particularly through a rigorous framework like AHP, forces an organization to have a candid, cross-functional conversation about its strategic identity and what variables genuinely drive success for its operations.

![Two intersecting stylized instruments over a central blue sphere, divided by diagonal planes. This visualizes sophisticated RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and managing counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-2.jpg)

## Beyond the Calculation

Ultimately, the output of any scoring model ▴ a single number ▴ is not the end of the decision process but a critical input to it. It provides a data-driven, defensible foundation for the final selection. The true value of a well-architected model is the clarity and confidence it brings to the decision-making team.

It transforms an often contentious and political process into a structured, transparent, and strategic exercise. The optimal weight for price is therefore the one that allows the scoring model to most accurately reflect the organization’s unique definition of value, empowering leaders to make a choice that is not just cheaper, but smarter.

![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives trading mechanism features a central processing hub with luminous blue accents, symbolizing an intelligence layer driving high fidelity execution. Transparent circular elements represent dynamic liquidity pools and a complex volatility surface, revealing market microstructure and atomic settlement via an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-framework-optimizing-market-microstructure-price-discovery-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Strategic Priorities

Meaning ▴ Strategic priorities are the principal objectives and areas of concentrated effort that an organization identifies as most critical for achieving its long-term vision and overall success. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Model, within the systems architecture of crypto investing and institutional trading, constitutes a quantitative analytical tool meticulously designed to assign numerical values to various attributes or indicators for the objective evaluation of a specific entity, asset, or event, thereby generating a composite, indicative score. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely bisected, layered spheres symbolize a Principal's RFQ operational framework. They reveal institutional market microstructure, deep liquidity pools, and multi-leg spread complexity, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives via an advanced Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-core.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/tco/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Clear sphere, precise metallic probe, reflective platform, blue internal light. This symbolizes RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery within market microstructure, leveraging dark liquidity for atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-1.jpg)

## Tco

Meaning ▴ TCO, or Total Cost of Ownership, is a financial estimate designed to help institutional decision-makers understand the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a system, product, or service over its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic cylindrical component, suggesting robust Prime RFQ infrastructure, interacts with a luminous teal-blue disc representing a dynamic liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives. A precise golden bar diagonally traverses, symbolizing an RFQ-driven block trade path, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure for institutional grade operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured decision-making framework designed to organize and analyze complex problems involving multiple, often qualitative, criteria and subjective judgments, particularly valuable in strategic crypto investing and technology evaluation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective and translucent discs overlap, symbolizing an RFQ protocol bridging market microstructure with institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts seamless price discovery and high-fidelity execution, accessing latent liquidity for optimal atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-best-price-discovery.jpg)

## Ahp

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured multi-criteria decision-making framework designed to address complex problems by decomposing them into hierarchical components. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular metallic structures intersect over a curved teal surface, symbolizing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, enabling private quotation, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency within a prime brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-via-rfq-protocol-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Vendor Viability

Meaning ▴ Vendor viability refers to the assessment of a third-party supplier's capacity, financial stability, and operational integrity to deliver agreed-upon products or services consistently and reliably. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sharp, intersecting blades, one white, one blue, represent precise RFQ protocols and high-fidelity execution within complex market microstructure. Behind them, translucent wavy forms signify dynamic liquidity pools, multi-leg spreads, and volatility surfaces](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-principal-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost represents the aggregated sum of all expenditures incurred in a specific process, project, or acquisition, encompassing both direct and indirect financial outlays. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, bimodal digital asset derivatives execution interface, partially open, revealing a dark, secure internal structure. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution and strategic price discovery via institutional RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Sensitivity Analysis

Meaning ▴ Sensitivity Analysis is a quantitative technique employed to determine how variations in input parameters or assumptions impact the outcome of a financial model, system performance, or investment strategy. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ An RFP Scoring Model is a structured analytical framework employed to objectively evaluate and rank responses received from vendors or service providers in response to a Request for Proposal (RFP). </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-model/), [Strategic Priorities](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-priorities/), [TCO](https://options.greeks.live/area/tco/), [Vendor Viability](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/), [AHP](https://options.greeks.live/area/ahp/), [Total Cost](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Most Defensible Method for Assigning Weights to Different Categories in a Software Rfp Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-defensible-method-for-assigning-weights-to-different-categories-in-a-software-rfp-rubric/)
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

A defensible RFP weighting method uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process to translate stakeholder judgments into a transparent, consistent, and mathematically-derived decision model.

- 
### [What Is the Role of Cross-Functional Teams in Defining and Weighting RFP Evaluation Criteria Effectively?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-cross-functional-teams-in-defining-and-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria-effectively/)
![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

A cross-functional team transforms RFP evaluation into a system for embedding strategic priorities into a quantifiable decision model.

- 
### [What Is the Recommended Percentage Weight for Price in a Strategic Sourcing Rfp Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-recommended-percentage-weight-for-price-in-a-strategic-sourcing-rfp-rubric/)
![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

The weight for price in an RFP rubric is a dynamic output of a strategic analysis, not a fixed input.

- 
### [How Do You Structure an Rfp Evaluation Matrix for Objective Vendor Comparison?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-for-objective-vendor-comparison/)
![A sleek pen hovers over a luminous circular structure with teal internal components, symbolizing precise RFQ initiation. This represents high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure and achieving atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ liquidity pool.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-through-prime-os-precision.jpg)

An RFP evaluation matrix is a weighted scoring system that translates complex vendor proposals into an objective, data-driven comparison.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Method for Weighting Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-method-for-weighting-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![A luminous central hub with radiating arms signifies an institutional RFQ protocol engine. It embodies seamless liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread strategies. Varied quadrants represent diverse market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency within a principal's operational framework, mitigating counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-hub-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

The optimal method for weighting RFP criteria is a structured, bias-reducing system like AHP that translates strategic priorities into a defensible, mathematical framework.

- 
### [How Can You Quantify the Financial Impact of a Poorly Weighted Rfp Scoring System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-the-financial-impact-of-a-poorly-weighted-rfp-scoring-system/)
![Interlocked, precision-engineered spheres reveal complex internal gears, illustrating the intricate market microstructure and algorithmic trading of an institutional grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

Quantifying the impact of a poor RFP scoring system involves modeling the total cost of ownership against a baseline to reveal hidden liabilities.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Non-Price Factors against Cost in an RFP Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-non-price-factors-against-cost-in-an-rfp-rubric/)
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

A rubric's weighting system translates strategic priorities into a quantitative model for value-based procurement decisions.

- 
### [What Is the Ideal Weight for Cost Criteria in a Strategic It Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-weight-for-cost-criteria-in-a-strategic-it-rfp-evaluation/)
![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure. A central channel ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement. Green nodes denote private quotation endpoints, enabling aggregated inquiry and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

The ideal cost weight in an IT RFP is a dynamic variable, calibrated to the procurement's strategic importance.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Qualitative Criteria in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-qualitative-criteria-in-an-rfp/)
![Intersecting teal and dark blue planes, with reflective metallic lines, depict structured pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol orchestration, and multi-venue liquidity aggregation within a Prime RFQ, reflecting precise market microstructure and optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-execution-liquidity-microstructure.jpg)

A structured weighting system codifies strategic priorities, transforming RFP evaluation into a defensible system for value-based partner selection.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Price in a Complex Rfp Scoring Model?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-price-in-a-complex-rfp-scoring-model/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-price-in-a-complex-rfp-scoring-model/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Price in a Complex Rfp Scoring Model? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The optimal price weight in an RFP model is the calculated output of a strategic process that quantifies long-term value over initial cost. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-price-in-a-complex-rfp-scoring-model/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T15:47:31+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-29T10:26:24+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg",
        "caption": "Two polished metallic disks, one partially overlapping, with a sophisticated blue and gold mechanical arm precisely positioned over the top disk. This image represents the core mechanism of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, facilitating high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery through advanced RFQ protocols. It signifies a prime brokerage system's intelligence layer, ensuring minimal latency and managing complex market microstructure for multi-leg spreads, ultimately reducing slippage and mitigating counterparty risk."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AHP",
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Price Weighting",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "Scoring Model",
        "Sensitivity Analysis",
        "Strategic Priorities",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Evaluation",
        "TCO",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Viability"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-price-in-a-complex-rfp-scoring-model/
