# What Is the Role of a Cross-Functional Committee in the RFP Weighting Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

![Beige module, dark data strip, teal reel, clear processing component. This illustrates an RFQ protocol's high-fidelity execution, facilitating principal-to-principal atomic settlement in market microstructure, essential for a Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Concept

![Abstractly depicting an institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. Intersecting beams symbolize cross-asset strategies and high-fidelity execution pathways, integrating a central, translucent disc representing deep liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem-unifying-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation-across-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## The Confluence of Expertise in Procurement

The Request for Proposal (RFP) process represents a critical juncture in an organization’s lifecycle, a moment where strategic intent must be translated into operational reality through the selection of a partner or vendor. The integrity of this process hinges on the quality of its evaluation, a mechanism that must be both rigorous and strategically aligned. A [cross-functional committee](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-real-time-enforcement-of-information-barriers-impact-cross-functional-team-collaboration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) serves as the structural embodiment of this principle.

It is an assembly of individuals drawn from disparate parts of the organization, each bringing a unique lens to the evaluation. This structure moves the selection process away from a siloed decision, which might over-index on a single criterion like cost, toward a holistic assessment that balances technical requirements, financial constraints, operational impact, and long-term strategic value.

This convergence of perspectives is foundational to mitigating the inherent risks of a significant procurement decision. A representative from the finance department can dissect a vendor’s pricing model and assess its long-term viability, while an engineer from the technology division can pressure-test the technical specifications and integration capabilities. Operations personnel can evaluate the workflow implications, and legal counsel can scrutinize the contractual terms for potential liabilities. The collective intelligence of this group provides a defense against the cognitive biases that can plague a single decision-maker or a homogenous group.

It institutionalizes a system of checks and balances, ensuring that no single departmental priority can unilaterally dictate the outcome. The result is a decision that is not only defensible but also deeply integrated with the organization’s overarching objectives.

> A cross-functional committee transforms vendor selection from a departmental task into a strategic exercise in corporate alignment.

![Abstract representation of a central RFQ hub facilitating high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. Two aggregated inquiries or block trades traverse the liquidity aggregation engine, signifying price discovery and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub-core.jpg)

## Systemic Integrity through Diverse Viewpoints

The primary function of this committee is to design and execute a weighting and scoring framework that is both objective and reflective of the organization’s true priorities. The initial stage of this process involves a collaborative definition of the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This is a critical exercise in negotiation and consensus-building, where the committee must translate broad strategic goals into quantifiable metrics.

For example, a strategic goal of “improving customer service” might be broken down into criteria such as “24/7 support availability,” “guaranteed response times,” and “access to a dedicated support engineer.” Each of these criteria is then assigned a weight, a numerical representation of its importance relative to all other criteria. This weighting process is where the cross-functional nature of the committee is most valuable.

The finance representative might argue for a higher weighting on “[total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” while the technology representative might advocate for a greater emphasis on “system scalability.” Through a structured dialogue, the committee arrives at a consensus that reflects a balanced view of the organization’s needs. This prevents the common pitfall of selecting a vendor that is inexpensive in the short term but creates significant technical debt or operational friction down the line. The committee’s diversity ensures that the [weighting model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-firms-risk-appetite-influence-the-weighting-of-kpis-in-a-dealer-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a true representation of the multifaceted value the organization seeks to obtain from the procurement. It creates a decision-making apparatus that is resilient to internal politics and short-term pressures, focusing instead on the long-term health and strategic trajectory of the enterprise.

![Transparent conduits and metallic components abstractly depict institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Symbolizing cross-protocol RFQ execution, multi-leg spreads, and high-fidelity atomic settlement across aggregated liquidity pools, it reflects prime brokerage infrastructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/cross-protocol-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure-system.jpg)

![A precise metallic instrument, resembling an algorithmic trading probe or a multi-leg spread representation, passes through a transparent RFQ protocol gateway. This illustrates high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-orchestration-of-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

![Parallel execution layers, light green, interface with a dark teal curved component. This depicts a secure RFQ protocol interface for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and block trade execution within a Prime RFQ framework, reflecting dynamic market microstructure for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Designing the Evaluation Architecture

The strategic implementation of a cross-functional committee begins with its careful composition. The selection of members is an architectural decision that will define the entire evaluation process. The committee should be a microcosm of the project’s impact zone, including stakeholders from every department that will interact with or be affected by the chosen solution. This typically includes representatives from core operational units, technology, finance, legal, and project management.

The leader of this committee plays a crucial role, acting as a facilitator and a neutral arbiter to guide the proceedings. Effective leadership ensures that all voices are heard and that the process adheres to a predefined timeline and methodology.

Once assembled, the committee’s first strategic task is the collaborative development of the RFP’s evaluation criteria and the corresponding weighting model. This is a systematic process that moves from the general to the specific. The committee starts by identifying high-level categories of evaluation, such as Technical Capabilities, Financial Considerations, Vendor Viability, and Implementation Support. Within each of these categories, the committee then defines a set of specific, measurable, and unambiguous criteria.

This granularity is essential for objective scoring. For instance, under “Technical Capabilities,” the criteria might include “API response time,” “data encryption standards,” and “disaster recovery plan.”

![Intricate metallic mechanisms portray a proprietary matching engine or execution management system. Its robust structure enables algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-market-microstructure.jpg)

## A Framework for Balanced Weighting

The allocation of weights to these criteria is the strategic heart of the process. It is a deliberative exercise where the committee must quantify the organization’s priorities. A common approach is to use a paired comparison method or a simple point allocation system, where the committee as a whole has 100 points to distribute across all criteria. This forces a conversation about trade-offs.

Does the organization value a lower upfront cost more than a robust service-level agreement? Is market reputation more important than a cutting-edge feature set? The debate and consensus that emerge from this process are invaluable, forging a shared understanding of the project’s success factors.

- **Technical Alignment** ▴ This category assesses how well the proposed solution meets the functional and non-functional requirements. The committee’s technical experts lead this evaluation, but input from operational users is vital to ensure the solution is practical in a real-world context. 

- **Financial Value** ▴ This goes beyond the initial price to consider the [total cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of ownership (TCO), including implementation fees, training costs, ongoing maintenance, and potential for future upgrades. The finance representative provides the analytical rigor for this assessment. 

- **Partnership Potential** ▴ This evaluates the vendor’s stability, reputation, and cultural fit with the organization. It considers factors like the vendor’s financial health, customer references, and the quality of their account management team. 

> The weighting model is the codified strategy of the procurement, translating organizational priorities into a mathematical decision-making framework.

![Translucent, multi-layered forms evoke an institutional RFQ engine, its propeller-like elements symbolizing high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading. This depicts precise price discovery, deep liquidity pool dynamics, and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-14.jpg)

## Executing the Scoring and Normalization Process

With the weighted scorecard in place, the committee moves to the execution phase of the strategy ▴ scoring the vendor proposals. Each member of the committee is typically responsible for scoring the proposals against the criteria that fall within their area of expertise. For example, the IT security expert would score the “data encryption” and “vulnerability management” criteria for all vendors. To maintain objectivity, it is crucial to establish a clear and consistent scoring scale, such as a 1-5 scale where 1 represents “Does Not Meet Requirement” and 5 represents “Exceeds Requirement.” Detailed definitions for each point on the scale should be agreed upon before scoring begins to minimize subjective interpretation.

After the initial scoring is complete, the scores must be normalized and compiled. This is a mathematical exercise to ensure that a particularly lenient or harsh scorer does not unduly influence the outcome. The raw scores from each evaluator are multiplied by the predetermined weights for each criterion to arrive at a [weighted score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

These weighted scores are then summed to produce a total score for each vendor. The table below illustrates a simplified version of this calculation.

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Vendor A Score (1-5) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (1-5) | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| API Scalability | 25 | 4 | 1.00 | 5 | 1.25 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | 30 | 5 | 1.50 | 3 | 0.90 |
| Implementation Support | 20 | 3 | 0.60 | 4 | 0.80 |
| Vendor Viability | 25 | 4 | 1.00 | 4 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100 | | 4.10 | | 3.95 |

The final scores provide a quantitative basis for the decision, but they do not replace the need for qualitative discussion. The committee should convene to review the results, discuss any significant discrepancies in scoring, and conduct a final deliberation. This discussion allows for the consideration of intangible factors that may not be fully captured in the scorecard. The final recommendation to executive leadership is therefore a product of both rigorous quantitative analysis and expert qualitative judgment, a hallmark of a well-executed [strategic sourcing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process. 

![A sleek, high-fidelity beige device with reflective black elements and a control point, set against a dynamic green-to-blue gradient sphere. This abstract representation symbolizes institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery within market microstructure, powered by an intelligence layer for alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-terminal-system.jpg)

![A vertically stacked assembly of diverse metallic and polymer components, resembling a modular lens system, visually represents the layered architecture of institutional digital asset derivatives. Each distinct ring signifies a critical market microstructure element, from RFQ protocol layers to aggregated liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-execution-stack.jpg)

## Execution

![Luminous central hub intersecting two sleek, symmetrical pathways, symbolizing a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Represents a liquidity pool facilitating atomic settlement via RFQ protocol streams for multi-leg spread execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution within a Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-pathways-optimized.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Committee Governance

The effective execution of a cross-functional committee’s mandate requires a disciplined, documented, and transparent operational playbook. This playbook governs the entire lifecycle of the evaluation process, from committee formation to the final vendor recommendation. It serves as the single source of truth for all participants, ensuring consistency and fairness. The initial step in this playbook is the formal chartering of the committee.

This charter document should explicitly define the committee’s purpose, scope, membership, roles and responsibilities, decision-making authority, and timeline. It is the constitution of the [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- **Committee Formation and Kickoff** ▴ The process begins with the identification and formal invitation of committee members. The kickoff meeting is a critical event where the charter is reviewed, the project goals are communicated, and the rules of engagement are established. This includes protocols for communication, meeting cadence, and conflict resolution. 

- **Criteria Development Workshop** ▴ A series of facilitated workshops are conducted to define the evaluation criteria and the weighting model. This is a collaborative process that requires active participation from all members. The output of these workshops is the finalized, weighted scorecard that will be used for the evaluation. 

- **Independent Scoring Period** ▴ Once the RFP responses are received, a dedicated period is allocated for independent scoring. During this time, committee members review the proposals and score them against the criteria within their domain of expertise. A strict firewall should be maintained during this period to prevent collusion or premature discussion that could bias the individual scores. 

- **Score Consolidation and Review** ▴ The project manager or a neutral facilitator collects the individual scorecards and consolidates them into a master spreadsheet. The consolidated scores are then distributed to the committee for review. A meeting is convened to discuss the results, analyze any significant variances in scoring, and allow members to ask clarifying questions of one another. 

- **Final Deliberation and Recommendation** ▴ The committee engages in a final deliberation to arrive at a consensus recommendation. This may involve further discussion, vendor presentations, or reference checks. The final decision is documented, along with the supporting rationale, in a formal recommendation report that is presented to the executive sponsors. 

> A rigorous operational playbook transforms the subjective art of evaluation into a disciplined science of collective decision-making.

![A sleek, metallic control mechanism with a luminous teal-accented sphere symbolizes high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its robust design represents Prime RFQ infrastructure enabling RFQ protocols for optimal price discovery, liquidity aggregation, and low-latency connectivity in algorithmic trading environments](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-control-for-optimal-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The quantitative underpinning of the committee’s work is the scoring model. While a simple weighted average model is common, more sophisticated approaches can provide a deeper level of analytical insight. One such approach is the use of a utility function for each criterion, which allows for the modeling of non-linear relationships between a score and its perceived value.

For example, in the case of system uptime, the value gained from moving from 99% to 99.9% is far greater than the value gained from moving from 95% to 96%. A utility function can capture this diminishing or increasing marginal utility, providing a more accurate representation of true business value.

Furthermore, [sensitivity analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) can be a powerful tool in the execution phase. This involves systematically altering the weights of the evaluation criteria to see how sensitive the final ranking of vendors is to changes in the committee’s priorities. This analysis can reveal which criteria are the true differentiators and can help the committee understand the robustness of its decision. If a small change in the weight of a single criterion causes a dramatic shift in the vendor rankings, it may indicate that the top vendors are very closely matched and that further due diligence is required.

| Criterion | Base Weight (%) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Weighted Score | Scenario 1 ▴ Weight +5% | Vendor A New Total | Vendor B New Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cost | 30 | 1.50 | 0.90 | Cost Weight = 35% | 4.35 | 3.80 |
| Scalability | 25 | 1.00 | 1.25 | Scalability Weight = 30% | 4.20 | 4.20 |
| Support | 20 | 0.60 | 0.80 | Support Weight = 25% | 4.20 | 4.15 |

This sensitivity analysis demonstrates that if the committee were to increase the importance of “Scalability” by just 5%, Vendor A and Vendor B would be tied. This is a powerful insight, prompting a deeper discussion about the organization’s true long-term priorities before a final decision is made. It elevates the conversation from a simple comparison of scores to a strategic dialogue about risk and future growth.

![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

## References

- Trent, Robert J. “Understanding and evaluating cross‐functional sourcing team leadership.” _The Journal of Supply Chain Management_, vol. 40, no. 4, 2004, pp. 22-37.

- Monczka, Robert M. et al. _Purchasing and Supply Chain Management_. Cengage Learning, 2021.

- Kahraman, Cengiz, et al. “A comparative analysis of multi-attribute decision making methods for supplier selection.” _The Engineering Economist_, vol. 48, no. 4, 2003, pp. 327-347.

- Englyst, L. et al. “Cross-functional sourcing teams ▴ a case study of the formation and development of a sourcing team.” _European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management_, vol. 14, no. 2, 2008, pp. 116-126.

- van Weele, Arjan J. _Purchasing and Supply Chain Management ▴ Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice_. Cengage Learning EMEA, 2018.

- Sartor, Marco, and Guido Orzes. “The role of cross-functional teams in sustainable new product development ▴ A systematic literature review.” _Journal of Cleaner Production_, vol. 237, 2019, p. 117718.

- He, Ying, et al. “Research on performance and dynamic competency evaluation of bid evaluation experts based on weight interval number.” _Alexandria Engineering Journal_, vol. 61, no. 12, 2022, pp. 10205-10217.

![Abstract geometric representation of an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Two distinct segments symbolize cross-market liquidity pools and order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-2.jpg)

## Reflection

![Interconnected metallic rods and a translucent surface symbolize a sophisticated RFQ engine for digital asset derivatives. This represents the intricate market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades and multi-leg spreads, optimizing capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Beyond the Scorecard

The framework of a cross-functional committee, with its weighted scorecards and quantitative models, provides an essential structure for complex procurement decisions. It establishes a rigorous, defensible, and transparent process. Yet, the ultimate success of this endeavor hinges on something that cannot be fully captured in a spreadsheet.

The true value emerges from the quality of the dialogue that the structure facilitates. It is in the nuanced debate between the finance manager and the lead engineer, in the challenging questions posed by the legal counsel, and in the operational scenarios envisioned by the line-of-business manager that the deepest insights are found.

The process, when executed with intellectual honesty, forces an organization to confront its own strategic identity. What are the non-negotiable pillars of our operational philosophy? What level of risk are we willing to accept in pursuit of innovation? How do we define value beyond the immediate financial impact?

The final vendor selection is an answer to these questions. The committee’s work, therefore, is not merely to select a vendor. It is to forge a corporate consensus and to codify a strategic choice into a tangible partnership. The ultimate measure of the committee’s success is not the score of the winning vendor, but the long-term strategic value that the chosen partnership delivers to the organization.

![Intersecting abstract elements symbolize institutional digital asset derivatives. Translucent blue denotes private quotation and dark liquidity, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-digital-asset-derivatives-optimal-execution-prime-os-microstructure-system.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-real-time-enforcement-of-information-barriers-impact-cross-functional-team-collaboration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision cross-section of an institutional digital asset derivatives system, revealing intricate market microstructure. Toroidal halves represent interconnected liquidity pools, centrally driven by an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-revealing-precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-optimal-high-fidelity-execution-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Cross-Functional Committee

Real-time information barriers restructure communication, balancing regulatory compliance with the fluid dynamics of team collaboration. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered modular components, with teal accents, align at a central interface. This visually embodies an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating principal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-interface-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image depicts two intersecting structural beams, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. These elements represent interconnected liquidity pools and execution pathways, crucial for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-firms-risk-appetite-influence-the-weighting-of-kpis-in-a-dealer-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Weighting Model

A firm's risk appetite dictates the weighting of KPIs in its dealer scoring model, shaping its counterparty risk management strategy. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract intersecting blades in varied textures depict institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms symbolize sophisticated RFQ protocol streams enabling multi-leg spread execution across aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost quantifies the comprehensive expenditure incurred across the entire lifecycle of a financial transaction, encompassing both explicit and implicit components. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective planes and intersecting elements depict institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central Principal-driven RFQ protocol ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## Strategic Sourcing

Meaning ▴ Strategic Sourcing, within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives, denotes a disciplined, systematic methodology for identifying, evaluating, and engaging with external providers of critical services and infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A golden rod, symbolizing RFQ initiation, converges with a teal crystalline matching engine atop a liquidity pool sphere. This illustrates high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-systemic-core.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Translucent, overlapping geometric shapes symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation within an institutional grade RFQ protocol. Central elements represent the execution management system's focal point for precise price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread digital asset derivatives, revealing complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-driving-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-precise-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Sensitivity Analysis

Meaning ▴ Sensitivity Analysis quantifies the impact of changes in independent variables on a dependent output, providing a precise measure of model responsiveness to input perturbations. </a>

**Tags:** [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/), [Procurement Governance](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-governance/), [Total Cost](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Vendor Selection Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-criteria/), [RFP Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-model/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does a Weighted Scoring Matrix Improve the Objectivity of an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-matrix-improve-the-objectivity-of-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Abstractly depicting an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives ecosystem. A robust base supports intersecting conduits, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and smart order routing. Floating spheres represent diverse liquidity pools and crypto derivatives, emphasizing market microstructure and capital efficiency via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-optimization.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix improves RFP objectivity by translating strategic priorities into a mathematical framework, ensuring all proposals are judged by the same, predefined standard.

- 
### [How Can a Company Ensure Its Rfp Evaluation Criteria Remain Aligned with Evolving Business Strategies?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-company-ensure-its-rfp-evaluation-criteria-remain-aligned-with-evolving-business-strategies/)
![A sophisticated mechanical core, split by contrasting illumination, represents an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ engine. Its precise concentric mechanisms symbolize High-Fidelity Execution, Market Microstructure optimization, and Algorithmic Trading within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution.jpg)

Align RFP criteria with strategy by treating it as a dynamic operating system, not a static checklist, ensuring continuous recalibration.

- 
### [How Can We Effectively Involve Stakeholders in the Rfp Weighting Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-effectively-involve-stakeholders-in-the-rfp-weighting-process/)
![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

A structured stakeholder engagement process transforms RFP weighting from a compliance task into a strategic system for encoding collective priorities.

- 
### [What Is the Relationship between the Transparency of Rfp Weighting and the Fostering of Long-Term Vendor Partnerships?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-the-transparency-of-rfp-weighting-and-the-fostering-of-long-term-vendor-partnerships/)
![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols. It symbolizes Aggregated Inquiry, optimal Liquidity Pool access, and Atomic Settlement within a Principal OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

Transparent RFP weighting re-architects procurement from a transactional negotiation to a strategic alignment, fostering partnerships based on shared, measurable value.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Properly Balance Price against Qualitative Factors in a Weighted Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-properly-balance-price-against-qualitative-factors-in-a-weighted-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A metallic stylus balances on a central fulcrum, symbolizing a Prime RFQ orchestrating high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes price discovery within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution through RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-digital-asset-derivatives-low-latency-best-execution.jpg)

A weighted RFP model balances price and quality by translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable, defensible scoring framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Create an Effective Scoring Model for Evaluating Rfp Responses?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-create-an-effective-scoring-model-for-evaluating-rfp-responses/)
![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement. This intelligence layer optimizes price discovery, managing portfolio margin and ensuring best execution in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

An effective RFP scoring model is a system that translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible selection framework.

- 
### [What Is the Ideal Size and Composition for an Rfp Evaluation Team for a Complex It Procurement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-size-and-composition-for-an-rfp-evaluation-team-for-a-complex-it-procurement/)
![Central teal cylinder, representing a Prime RFQ engine, intersects a dark, reflective, segmented surface. This abstractly depicts institutional digital asset derivatives price discovery, ensuring high-fidelity execution for block trades and liquidity aggregation within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-core-framework.jpg)

An ideal RFP evaluation team is a precisely engineered decision-making unit, sized and composed to systematically de-risk and validate complex IT investments.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Balance Cost against Technical Capabilities in RFP Weighting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-balance-cost-against-technical-capabilities-in-rfp-weighting/)
![A segmented, teal-hued system component with a dark blue inset, symbolizing an RFQ engine within a Prime RFQ, emerges from darkness. Illuminated by an optimized data flow, its textured surface represents market microstructure intricacies, facilitating high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via private quotation for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

Balancing RFP weights is a data-driven codification of strategic priorities to maximize long-term value, not just minimize initial cost.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Structuring a Cross-Functional Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-structuring-a-cross-functional-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![Symmetrical internal components, light green and white, converge at central blue nodes. This abstract representation embodies a Principal's operational framework, enabling high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-core.jpg)

A cross-functional RFP committee is a purpose-built system for converting diverse expertise into an optimal, risk-mitigated procurement decision.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Role of a Cross-Functional Committee in the RFP Weighting Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-cross-functional-committee-in-the-rfp-weighting-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-cross-functional-committee-in-the-rfp-weighting-process/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Role of a Cross-Functional Committee in the RFP Weighting Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A cross-functional committee institutionalizes a holistic, data-driven evaluation to align procurement with strategic enterprise value. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-cross-functional-committee-in-the-rfp-weighting-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T13:49:03+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T13:49:13+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract visual represents the foundational Prime RFQ architecture enabling institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Intersecting beams illustrate cross-market execution rails and aggregated inquiry pathways, optimizing liquidity pool access. The design signifies high-fidelity execution through advanced algorithmic trading and smart order routing, facilitating block trade capabilities and precise price discovery. It encapsulates the seamless integration required for multi-leg spread strategies, mitigating counterparty risk and ensuring capital efficiency within complex market microstructure for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Cross-Functional Teams",
        "Decision-Making Framework",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Procurement Process",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "RFP Weighting",
        "Sensitivity Analysis",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Evaluation",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection Criteria"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-cross-functional-committee-in-the-rfp-weighting-process/
