# What Is the Role of a Minimum Quality Threshold in a Fair Rfp Evaluation Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated control panel, featuring concentric blue and white segments with two teal oval buttons. This embodies an institutional RFQ Protocol interface, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Private Quotation and Aggregated Inquiry](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

![Abstract, sleek components, a dark circular disk and intersecting translucent blade, represent the precise Market Microstructure of an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ engine. It embodies High-Fidelity Execution, Algorithmic Trading, and optimized Price Discovery within a robust Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-rfq-system-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The role of a [minimum quality threshold](https://prime.greeks.live/area/minimum-quality-threshold/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (MQT) within a Request for Proposal (RFP) evaluation is a foundational element of strategic procurement, serving as a system-critical gateway. It functions as a non-negotiable set of criteria that a proposal must meet to even be considered for further, more detailed analysis. This mechanism fundamentally bifurcates the evaluation process into two distinct, sequential phases ▴ first, an objective validation of core competence and compliance, and second, a comparative assessment of value among the qualified contenders. The MQT establishes a baseline for quality, ensuring that the allure of a low price does not compromise the essential operational, technical, or safety requirements of a project.

Viewing the RFP process as an operational system for acquiring critical services or goods, the MQT acts as the initial, most important filter. Its purpose is to eliminate proposals that, regardless of their cost profile, present an unacceptable level of risk or are fundamentally incapable of delivering the required outcome. This structural separation is vital for maintaining the integrity and fairness of the procurement process.

It prevents the cognitive bias where a strikingly low bid can unduly influence the perception of a proposal’s technical merits. By establishing a clear pass/fail demarcation point before financial details are even considered, an organization codifies its definition of “acceptable” and protects itself from the long-term consequences of selecting a non-viable partner.

The implementation of this threshold transforms the evaluation from a purely subjective exercise into a structured, defensible, and transparent procedure. It forces the procuring entity to define its essential, non-negotiable requirements with precision before engaging the market. This pre-emptive act of definition is a powerful strategic tool. It communicates to potential bidders the core priorities of the organization and signals that technical capability and quality are prerequisites for competition.

Consequently, the MQT acts as a deterrent to unqualified bidders, saving time and resources for both the issuing organization and the vendors themselves. The result is a more focused and efficient evaluation, centered on a pool of proposals that have already demonstrated a fundamental capacity to succeed.

> A minimum quality threshold acts as a structural safeguard, ensuring that only proposals demonstrating foundational viability proceed to competitive evaluation.

This mechanism is particularly potent in complex procurements where the consequences of failure are severe, such as in public infrastructure projects, enterprise technology implementations, or critical service contracts. In these domains, the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) often far exceeds the initial procurement price, encompassing maintenance, support, and the cost of potential failures. The MQT is the primary tool for managing this long-term financial exposure, ensuring that the initial selection is grounded in capability, not just initial cost. It establishes a fair and level playing field where all competitors who proceed to the final stages are judged on a common foundation of proven competence.

![A sleek, metallic module with a dark, reflective sphere sits atop a cylindrical base, symbolizing an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This system processes aggregated inquiries for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads while managing gamma exposure and slippage within dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

![A sleek, metallic algorithmic trading component with a central circular mechanism rests on angular, multi-colored reflective surfaces, symbolizing sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated liquidity, and high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This represents the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ for optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-system-architecture-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

![A symmetrical, high-tech digital infrastructure depicts an institutional-grade RFQ execution hub. Luminous conduits represent aggregated liquidity for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system.jpg)

## Calibrating the Value Aperture

Strategically deploying a minimum [quality threshold](https://prime.greeks.live/question/beyond-a-certain-threshold-of-trading-volume-how-can-dark-pools-negatively-affect-market-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires a nuanced understanding of its two primary implementation models ▴ the Binary Pass/Fail Gateway and the [Scored Quality Gateway](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-an-esb-and-an-api-gateway-for-derivatives-trade-processing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Each model serves a different strategic purpose and is suited to different types of procurement. The choice between them is a critical decision that shapes the entire competitive landscape of the RFP.

The Binary Pass/Fail Gateway is the most direct application of the MQT. It comprises a checklist of mandatory requirements. A proposal either meets every single one of these requirements, or it is disqualified. There is no partial credit.

This model is most effective when the requirements are objective, easily verifiable, and truly non-negotiable. Examples include possessing specific licenses, certifications, insurance levels, or meeting unambiguous technical specifications. The strategic advantage of this model is its clarity and defensibility. It removes all subjectivity from the initial screening phase, creating a bright-line test that is easy to administer and difficult to challenge.

The Scored [Quality Gateway](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-an-esb-and-an-api-gateway-for-derivatives-trade-processing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) offers a more flexible approach. In this model, various quality-related criteria are assigned points, and proposals must achieve a minimum total score to pass the threshold and proceed to the financial evaluation. This allows for a more holistic assessment of quality, acknowledging that a proposal might be exceptionally strong in some areas even if it is merely adequate in others. This approach is better suited for complex projects where quality is multifaceted and less easily reduced to a simple checklist.

For instance, criteria might include the experience of the proposed team, the sophistication of the project management methodology, or the robustness of a quality assurance plan. The strategic value here lies in its ability to recognize superior, well-rounded proposals while still filtering out those that are fundamentally weak.

### Comparison of MQT Implementation Models

| Model | Description | Strategic Advantage | Optimal Use Case |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Binary Pass/Fail Gateway | Proposals must meet 100% of a list of mandatory, non-negotiable requirements to qualify. | Provides maximum clarity, objectivity, and legal defensibility. It simplifies the initial screening process significantly. | Procurements with clear, objective prerequisites like licenses, certifications, or specific technical standards. |
| Scored Quality Gateway | Proposals are scored against multiple weighted quality criteria and must achieve a minimum cumulative score to qualify. | Allows for a more nuanced and holistic assessment of quality, recognizing overall strength even with minor weaknesses. | Complex projects where quality is multifaceted, such as professional services, software development, or research initiatives. |

![A precisely balanced transparent sphere, representing an atomic settlement or digital asset derivative, rests on a blue cross-structure symbolizing a robust RFQ protocol or execution management system. This setup is anchored to a textured, curved surface, depicting underlying market microstructure or institutional-grade infrastructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimized price discovery, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-engineered-rfq-block-trade-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## A System for Mitigating Latent Risk

The MQT is a primary instrument for proactive risk management within the procurement lifecycle. Its strategic function is to identify and neutralize specific categories of risk before they can impact the organization. By insisting on a baseline of quality, the system actively defends against threats that are often invisible in a purely price-driven evaluation.

> The strategic application of a quality threshold is an exercise in defining the acceptable risk tolerance of an organization.

These mitigated risks can be categorized for greater clarity:

- **Operational Risk** ▴ This encompasses the risk of project failure, service disruption, or poor performance. An MQT that validates a vendor’s experience, technical capacity, and project management capabilities directly reduces the likelihood of operational underperformance.

- **Financial Risk** ▴ Beyond the initial bid price, this includes the risk of cost overruns, unexpected maintenance expenses, and the overall Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). A quality threshold focused on vendor stability, robust methodologies, and durable solutions protects the organization’s long-term financial health.

- **Reputational Risk** ▴ Selecting a low-quality vendor can lead to public failure, customer dissatisfaction, and damage to the organization’s brand. The MQT acts as a safeguard, ensuring that any potential partner meets a minimum standard of professionalism and competence.

- **Compliance and Legal Risk** ▴ In many industries, particularly the public sector, adherence to regulations and standards is mandatory. A binary pass/fail MQT is an essential tool to ensure all potential vendors meet these legal prerequisites, avoiding future litigation or regulatory penalties.

Ultimately, the strategy behind the MQT is to shift the procurement focus from a short-sighted comparison of bids to a long-term assessment of value and partnership viability. It forces a disciplined, upfront conversation about what “quality” means to the organization and what level of risk is acceptable. This process of definition and enforcement is the hallmark of a mature and strategically-minded procurement function.

![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

![A sleek, illuminated control knob emerges from a robust, metallic base, representing a Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its glowing bands signify real-time analytics and high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, enabling optimal price discovery and capital efficiency in dark pools for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Execution

![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ component, showcasing a reflective sphere and teal control. This symbolizes RFQ protocol mechanics, emphasizing high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-system-design.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

Executing a [minimum quality](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-the-use-of-minimum-fill-quantities-in-dark-pools-inadvertently-harm-execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) threshold within an RFP process is a systematic endeavor that demands precision and foresight. It is not a single action but a sequence of deliberate steps designed to build a fair and robust evaluation framework. This playbook outlines the critical path from conception to implementation, ensuring the MQT is both effective and defensible.

- **Stakeholder Alignment and Core Requirements Definition** ▴ The process begins internally. The procurement team must convene with all key project stakeholders ▴ technical experts, end-users, legal counsel, and finance representatives ▴ to define what constitutes “minimum quality.” This is the most critical phase, where non-negotiable operational needs, technical specifications, and legal mandates are identified and agreed upon.

- **Translation into Measurable Criteria** ▴ Abstract requirements must be converted into concrete, measurable criteria. A requirement for “an experienced team” becomes “the proposed project manager must have a minimum of 10 years of experience in projects of similar scope and a PMP certification.” A need for “financial stability” becomes “the vendor must provide audited financial statements for the past three years showing positive net income.” Each criterion must be unambiguous and verifiable.

- **Selection of the Threshold Model** ▴ Based on the nature of the criteria, the team must decide whether to use a Binary Pass/Fail Gateway or a [Scored Quality](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-pre-trade-analytics-differentiate-between-high-quality-and-low-quality-quotes-in-an-rfq-auction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Gateway. For procurements with a mix of hard requirements (like licenses) and qualitative factors (like methodology), a hybrid approach can be used, where binary criteria are checked first, followed by a scored evaluation for those who pass.

- **Establishment of the Threshold Level** ▴ For a Scored Quality Gateway, the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) must determine the minimum passing score. This score should be set at a level that indicates a high probability of successful project execution. Setting it too low defeats the purpose of the filter, while setting it too high may unnecessarily limit competition. This decision should be documented along with its rationale. For example, a threshold of 75 out of 100 points might be deemed the minimum acceptable level of quality.

- **Clear Articulation in the RFP Document** ▴ The MQT, including all criteria and the specific threshold (pass/fail or minimum score), must be explicitly and transparently stated in the RFP document. This ensures all potential bidders understand the rules of engagement from the outset, promoting fairness and reducing the likelihood of disputes.

- **Sequestered Evaluation Execution** ▴ The evaluation process must be strictly sequenced. The evaluation committee first assesses all proposals against only the MQT criteria, without any access to or knowledge of the cost proposals. This is often called a “two-envelope” system, where technical/quality proposals are opened and evaluated first.

- **Documentation and Final Decision** ▴ Only the proposals that successfully pass the MQT proceed to the next stage. At this point, the cost proposals for the qualified group are opened and evaluated. The final selection is then made from this pre-qualified pool based on the methodology outlined in the RFP (e.g. [best value](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), lowest cost among qualified bidders). The entire process, including the scoring and pass/fail decisions for each proposal at the MQT stage, must be meticulously documented to create a clear audit trail.

![Intersecting metallic components symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol framework. This system enables High-Fidelity Execution and Atomic Settlement for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-specialists.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The heart of a defensible Scored Quality Gateway is a well-constructed quantitative evaluation matrix. This tool translates qualitative assessments into numerical data, providing a structured basis for comparison. The design of this matrix is a critical exercise in codifying an organization’s priorities. Here, the calibration of weights becomes as much an art as a science, reflecting the organization’s core priorities with mathematical precision.

The following table illustrates a sample scoring matrix for a hypothetical RFP for an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implementation. The MQT has been set at a minimum required technical score of 70 points. Any proposal failing to achieve this score would be disqualified before its price is considered.

### Sample RFP Scoring Matrix ▴ ERP System Implementation (MQT = 70 Points)

| Evaluation Criterion | Maximum Points | Weighting | Vendor A Score | Vendor B Score | Vendor C Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Technical Solution Fit (Alignment with specified functional requirements) | 100 | 30% | 85 | 90 | 65 |
| 2. Implementation Methodology (Clarity of plan, risk mitigation, timeline) | 100 | 25% | 70 | 95 | 75 |
| 3. Vendor Experience & Past Performance (References, similar projects) | 100 | 20% | 90 | 80 | 60 |
| 4. Post-Implementation Support (SLA terms, training, support structure) | 100 | 15% | 75 | 85 | 80 |
| 5. Team Expertise (Qualifications of key personnel) | 100 | 10% | 80 | 90 | 70 |
| Weighted Technical Score | 100 | 100% | 81.25 | 89.75 | 68.75 |

> The scoring matrix is the instrument that translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable and defensible decision.

In this analysis, Vendor A and Vendor B both comfortably exceed the 70-point minimum quality threshold. Vendor C, despite having a decent implementation plan and support structure, falls short due to significant weaknesses in its technical solution fit and past performance. Therefore, Vendor C’s proposal is removed from consideration. The competition now proceeds to the next phase, where the price proposals of only Vendor A and Vendor B are opened and weighed against their high technical scores to determine the best overall value.

![An institutional grade system component, featuring a reflective intelligence layer lens, symbolizes high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight. This enables price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

To fully grasp the systemic impact of a minimum quality threshold, consider the case of a mid-sized municipality, “River City,” issuing an RFP for the construction of a new community recreation center. The project is valued at $15 million and is a high-profile initiative for the city council. The city’s procurement office, under pressure to demonstrate fiscal responsibility, designs an RFP process. The central point of contention during the design phase is whether to implement a strict MQT or to use a more blended evaluation where quality and price are considered simultaneously.

A senior procurement officer, having seen past projects derailed by low-cost, low-quality contractors, advocates for a robust Scored Quality Gateway. The MQT is established with a minimum passing score of 75 out of 100, with criteria focused on contractor safety records (E-MOD rating), experience with similar public buildings, financial solvency (bonding capacity), and the qualifications of the proposed site superintendent. Other council members are wary, fearing this will drive up the price by excluding cheaper bidders.

Three bids are received. “Alpha Constructors” submits a bid for $13.5 million, significantly undercutting the city’s estimate. Their proposal is light on detail, and their safety record is average.

“Bravo Builders,” a well-regarded regional firm, submits a bid of $15.2 million, with a detailed project plan, an excellent safety record, and a highly experienced team. “Charlie Contractors,” a newer firm, bids $14.8 million, showing innovative design ideas but lacking deep experience with public sector projects.

The evaluation committee first applies the MQT. Bravo Builders scores a 92, easily passing. Charlie Contractors scores a 78, also passing the threshold. Alpha Constructors, however, scores a 65.

Their safety record is below the required standard, their submitted financial documents show weak cash flow, and the proposed superintendent lacks the specified years of experience. Under the MQT protocol, Alpha’s bid is disqualified. Their attractive $13.5 million price is never officially considered in the final comparison.

The competition is now between Bravo and Charlie. The city evaluates their price proposals in conjunction with their high technical scores. After interviews and reference checks, the city awards the contract to Bravo Builders. While their initial price was higher, their superior experience and risk management plan provided a higher degree of certainty, representing the best long-term value.

Six months into the project, a severe storm hits the region. The robust construction methods used by Bravo Builders, a key element of their quality proposal, withstand the storm with minimal damage. Meanwhile, a nearby private project built by Alpha Constructors suffers significant structural damage, leading to costly rework and delays. The city’s decision, guided by the MQT, is vindicated.

The threshold did not merely filter out a low-quality bid; it functioned as a predictive risk mitigation system, preventing a future scenario of costly failure, litigation, and public outcry. The slightly higher initial investment secured a resilient, high-quality asset, demonstrating the profound financial and operational wisdom of enforcing a quality baseline.

![A precision metallic instrument with a black sphere rests on a multi-layered platform. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-component-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

In a modern procurement ecosystem, the MQT is not just a procedural concept; it is an architectural feature embedded within e-procurement and source-to-pay (S2P) platforms. The technological execution of the MQT enhances its efficiency, transparency, and integrity. These systems are designed to automate the segregation and sequential evaluation that are central to the MQT’s function.

The system architecture typically involves digital “envelopes” or secure, access-controlled modules. When vendors submit their proposals through a procurement portal, their submission is automatically partitioned. The technical/quality proposal is routed to one digital module, while the pricing proposal is routed to another, completely firewalled module.

The evaluation committee members are granted access credentials only for the technical module initially. The system’s internal logic makes it impossible for them to view pricing information until the technical evaluation is formally completed and the MQT results are entered.

Once the evaluators enter their scores for each proposal into the system’s scoring matrix, the platform automatically calculates the weighted scores and applies the pre-configured MQT rule. For proposals that fail to meet the threshold, the system flags them as “Disqualified” and archives them. Crucially, the corresponding pricing module for these disqualified bids remains locked and inaccessible, creating an unimpeachable audit trail.

For the proposals that pass, the system then unlocks the pricing modules and makes them available to the committee for the final stage of evaluation. This automated workflow eliminates the possibility of human error or bias in the sequencing of the evaluation, enforcing fairness at a system level.

![Sleek, domed institutional-grade interface with glowing green and blue indicators highlights active RFQ protocols and price discovery. This signifies high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, ensuring real-time liquidity and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg)

## References

- Schooner, Steven L. and Daniel I. Gordon. “The ‘Two-Envelope’ System ▴ A Sustainable Approach to Best Value Procurement.” Public Contract Law Journal, vol. 42, no. 3, 2013, pp. 575-601.

- Thai, Khi V. “International public procurement ▴ Concepts and practices.” International handbook of public procurement. Routledge, 2009. 1-18.

- Tadelis, Steven. “Public Procurement and the Private Sector.” Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics, vol. 8, no. 3, 2012, pp. 147-224.

- Albano, Gian Luigi, et al. “A Primer on Public Procurement.” Handbook of Procurement, edited by Nicola Dimitri et al. Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 25-62.

- Office of Management and Budget. “Evaluating RFP Responses, Part 1 (Overview).” State of Ohio, 2018.

- National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO). “Best Practices in State Government Procurement.” NASPO, 2021.

- Yukins, Christopher R. “A Versatile Tool ▴ The Use of ‘Best Value’ in U.S. Federal Procurement.” The Government Contractor, vol. 54, no. 43, 2012.

![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## The Imprint of an Organization’s Values

Ultimately, the design and enforcement of a minimum quality threshold is a reflection of an organization’s core operational philosophy. It moves beyond the tactical act of purchasing and enters the strategic domain of value definition. The specific criteria chosen for the threshold, and the rigor with which they are applied, create a clear imprint of what the organization deems essential for success. It is a public declaration of its standards.

A procurement process without a meaningful quality gateway implicitly signals that price is the dominant, if not sole, determinant of value. A system that incorporates a robust MQT, conversely, demonstrates a mature understanding that true value is a composite of quality, risk mitigation, and long-term performance. The framework you build to evaluate others is, in the end, a mirror.

It reveals your own organization’s definition of excellence, its tolerance for risk, and its commitment to the successful execution of its mission. The integrity of the system you design is a direct measure of the integrity of the outcomes you can expect to achieve.

![Sleek, interconnected metallic components with glowing blue accents depict a sophisticated institutional trading platform. A central element and button signify high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/minimum-quality-threshold/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central polished disc, with contrasting segments, represents Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ core. A textured rod signifies RFQ Protocol High-Fidelity Execution and Low Latency Market Microstructure data flow to the Quantitative Analysis Engine for Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-system-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Minimum Quality Threshold

Meaning ▴ A Minimum Quality Threshold represents the lowest acceptable standard of performance, reliability, security, or data integrity that a crypto system, service, or asset must satisfy to be deemed viable or acceptable for operational use or investment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-an-esb-and-an-api-gateway-for-derivatives-trade-processing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A smooth, off-white sphere rests within a meticulously engineered digital asset derivatives RFQ platform, featuring distinct teal and dark blue metallic components. This sophisticated market microstructure enables private quotation, high-fidelity execution, and optimized price discovery for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-microstructure-core.jpg)

## Scored Quality Gateway

An ESB centralizes integration logic to connect legacy systems; an API Gateway provides agile, secure access to decentralized services. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/beyond-a-certain-threshold-of-trading-volume-how-can-dark-pools-negatively-affect-market-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate core of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcasing precision platters symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and a high-fidelity execution arm. This depicts robust principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocol processing and market microstructure for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-execution-system.jpg)

## Quality Threshold

High dark pool volume erodes public price discovery, increasing fragmentation and adverse selection risk for all market participants. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-an-esb-and-an-api-gateway-for-derivatives-trade-processing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Quality Gateway

An ESB centralizes integration logic to connect legacy systems; an API Gateway provides agile, secure access to decentralized services. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-the-use-of-minimum-fill-quantities-in-dark-pools-inadvertently-harm-execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective planes and intersecting elements depict institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central Principal-driven RFQ protocol ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision.jpg)

## Minimum Quality

The use of minimum fill quantities can harm execution quality by increasing adverse selection risk and opportunity costs. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-pre-trade-analytics-differentiate-between-high-quality-and-low-quality-quotes-in-an-rfq-auction/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, bimodal digital asset derivatives execution interface, partially open, revealing a dark, secure internal structure. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution and strategic price discovery via institutional RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Scored Quality

Pre-trade analytics differentiate quotes by systematically scoring counterparty reliability and predicting execution quality beyond price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central blue structural hub, emblematic of a robust Prime RFQ, extends four metallic and illuminated green arms. These represent diverse liquidity streams and multi-leg spread strategies for high-fidelity digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging advanced RFQ protocols for optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee, in the context of institutional crypto investing, particularly for large-scale procurement of trading services, technology solutions, or strategic partnerships, refers to a designated group of experts responsible for assessing proposals and making recommendations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, spherical, off-white device with a glowing cyan lens symbolizes an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer. It drives High-Fidelity Execution of Digital Asset Derivatives via RFQ Protocols, enabling Optimal Liquidity Aggregation and Price Discovery for Market Microstructure Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

## Best Value

Meaning ▴ Best Value, in the context of crypto trading and institutional Request for Quote (RFQ) processes, represents the optimal combination of execution price, speed, certainty of fill, and overall transaction cost for an order. </a>

**Tags:** [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/), [Minimum Quality Threshold](https://options.greeks.live/area/minimum-quality-threshold/), [Quantitative Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/quantitative-scoring/), [Two-Envelope System](https://options.greeks.live/area/two-envelope-system/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Value for Money](https://options.greeks.live/area/value-for-money/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Components of a Defensible RFP Scoring Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-components-of-a-defensible-rfp-scoring-rubric/)
![A precise metallic and transparent teal mechanism symbolizes the intricate market microstructure of a Prime RFQ. It facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocols for private quotation, aggregated inquiry, and block trade management, ensuring best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-principal-trading-systems-driving-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocols.jpg)

A defensible RFP scoring rubric is an architectural system for objective, transparent, and legally sound vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Role of Qualitative Analysis in an Rfp Evaluation Process That Primarily Uses a Quantitative Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-qualitative-analysis-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process-that-primarily-uses-a-quantitative-scoring-model/)
![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

Qualitative analysis provides the essential risk assessment and strategic alignment context that transforms a quantitative score into a truly defensible procurement decision.

- 
### [What Is the Ideal Composition of an Rfp Evaluation Committee for a Complex It Procurement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-composition-of-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-for-a-complex-it-procurement/)
![A luminous conical element projects from a multi-faceted transparent teal crystal, signifying RFQ protocol precision and price discovery. This embodies institutional grade digital asset derivatives high-fidelity execution, leveraging Prime RFQ for liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-rfq-protocol-orchestration-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

An ideal RFP evaluation committee is a multi-disciplinary system engineered for objective analysis and strategic risk mitigation.

- 
### [How Does a Multi-Stage Rfp Impact the Potential for Vendor Protests and Legal Challenges?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-multi-stage-rfp-impact-the-potential-for-vendor-protests-and-legal-challenges/)
![A beige Prime RFQ chassis features a glowing teal transparent panel, symbolizing an Intelligence Layer for high-fidelity execution. A clear tube, representing a private quotation channel, holds a precise instrument for algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-system-interface.jpg)

A multi-stage RFP minimizes vendor protests by architecting a transparent, phased process that builds a defensible record of fairness.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Key Performance Indicators for Measuring RFP Evaluation Consistency?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-key-performance-indicators-for-measuring-rfp-evaluation-consistency/)
![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

Measuring RFP evaluation consistency requires a systemic approach using KPIs like scoring variance and inter-rater reliability to ensure objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Role of a Non-Voting Facilitator in an Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-role-of-a-non-voting-facilitator-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![Polished opaque and translucent spheres intersect sharp metallic structures. This abstract composition represents advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating multi-leg spread execution, latent liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution within principal-driven trading environments.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimal-execution-orchestration.jpg)

A non-voting facilitator is the procedural architect of an RFP evaluation, ensuring decision integrity without influencing the outcome.

- 
### [What Are the Key Elements That Must Be Included in an Rfp Evaluation Committee Charter to Ensure Its Effectiveness?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-elements-that-must-be-included-in-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-charter-to-ensure-its-effectiveness/)
![Abstract geometric structure with sharp angles and translucent planes, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. The central point signifies a core RFQ protocol engine, enabling precise price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg options strategies, crucial for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-operational-framework-optimizing-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-for-alpha-generation.jpg)

An RFP Evaluation Committee Charter is a foundational protocol that ensures decision integrity through a structured, objective, and defensible framework.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Setting Weights for Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-setting-weights-for-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool. This depicts high-fidelity execution of block trades through RFQ protocols in complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

A robust RFP evaluation system translates strategic intent into a defensible decision by weighting criteria to reflect true value over initial cost.

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Weight Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-weight-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A precise, multi-faceted geometric structure represents institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. Its sharp angles denote high-fidelity execution and price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, symbolizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-framework.jpg)

The best way to weight RFP criteria is to create a data-driven model that translates strategic priorities into a defensible evaluation framework.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Role of a Minimum Quality Threshold in a Fair Rfp Evaluation Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-minimum-quality-threshold-in-a-fair-rfp-evaluation-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-minimum-quality-threshold-in-a-fair-rfp-evaluation-process/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Role of a Minimum Quality Threshold in a Fair Rfp Evaluation Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A minimum quality threshold is the structural gatekeeper in an RFP system, ensuring that fiscal consideration is only granted to operationally viable proposals. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-minimum-quality-threshold-in-a-fair-rfp-evaluation-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T11:29:21+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-28T00:18:59+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg",
        "caption": "Abstract multi-layered composition of dark reflective planes, white structural forms, and luminous blue conduits with circular elements. This represents an institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocol, engineered for high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery across multi-leg spread strategies. It signifies the principal's robust operational framework, ensuring capital efficiency, minimized slippage, and proactive counterparty risk management within dynamic market microstructure."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best Value",
        "Best Value Procurement",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Go/No-Go Gateway",
        "Minimum Quality Threshold",
        "Procurement Risk Management",
        "Proposal Evaluation",
        "Public Procurement",
        "Quantitative Scoring",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Two-Envelope System",
        "Value for Money",
        "Vendor Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-minimum-quality-threshold-in-a-fair-rfp-evaluation-process/
