# What Is the Role of a Pass/Fail Criterion in a Hybrid Rfp Evaluation Framework? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A diagonal metallic framework supports two dark circular elements with blue rims, connected by a central oval interface. This represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, facilitating block trade execution, high-fidelity execution, dark liquidity, and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![A sphere split into light and dark segments, revealing a luminous core. This encapsulates the precise Request for Quote RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, highlighting high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and advanced market microstructure within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

## Concept

A pass/fail criterion within a hybrid Request for Proposal (RFP) [evaluation framework](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) functions as a non-negotiable gateway. It is a binary mechanism designed to enforce minimum standards and mandatory requirements at the earliest possible stage of the procurement process. Its role is to systematically filter out vendor proposals that are fundamentally non-compliant or lack essential capabilities, thereby ensuring that only qualified contenders advance to more nuanced, qualitative, and quantitative stages of evaluation. This initial sorting mechanism is fundamental to the architectural integrity of the entire sourcing operation.

The implementation of such a criterion provides a structural layer of risk management. By defining absolute prerequisites ▴ such as specific regulatory certifications, minimum years of operational experience, or non-negotiable technical specifications ▴ an organization establishes a clear baseline for participation. This pre-emptive qualification conserves valuable internal resources.

Evaluation teams are shielded from the considerable effort of conducting deep analysis on proposals that are destined for rejection. The clarity of a pass/fail gate streamlines the subsequent, more resource-intensive evaluation phases, allowing for a more focused and rigorous comparison of viable solutions.

In a [hybrid evaluation model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/hybrid-evaluation-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), which blends absolute requirements with [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the pass/fail element provides a critical foundation. It separates the “must-haves” from the “nice-to-haves.” While weighted scoring allows for the assessment of relative strengths and weaknesses across a spectrum of desirable features, the pass/fail questions address deal-breaking issues. A vendor might offer an exceptionally low price or innovative features, but if it fails to meet a mandatory security compliance standard, the entire proposal is rendered irrelevant.

The pass/fail mechanism thus upholds the strategic priorities of the organization by preventing them from being diluted by other, less critical evaluation factors. It ensures that the final selection is made from a pool of vendors who, at a minimum, meet all foundational requirements for a successful partnership.

![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

![Central teal-lit mechanism with radiating pathways embodies a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It signifies RFQ protocol processing, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread trades, enabling atomic settlement within market microstructure via quantitative analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic deployment of [pass/fail criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pass-fail-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) within a hybrid [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) framework is a defining element of sophisticated procurement architecture. It moves the evaluation process from a simple comparative exercise to a structured, multi-stage filtration system. The core strategic purpose is to de-risk the procurement cycle by front-loading the disqualification of unsuitable vendors, thereby optimizing the allocation of analytical resources toward contenders that genuinely align with the organization’s core operational and technical mandates.

![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

## Designing the Filtration Gates

The design of pass/fail criteria requires a precise articulation of what is truly non-negotiable. These are not areas for compromise or trade-offs; they are the absolute pillars upon which a successful outcome depends. The process begins with an internal deep-dive, involving key stakeholders from technical, financial, legal, and operational departments to codify the absolute minimum requirements for a vendor to be considered viable. These requirements are then translated into clear, unambiguous, and verifiable questions within the RFP document.

A sound strategy involves categorizing these criteria to ensure comprehensive coverage of foundational risks. These categories typically include:

- **Regulatory and [Compliance Mandates](https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-mandates/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This gate ensures adherence to industry-specific laws and standards (e.g. GDPR, HIPAA, ISO certifications). A failure here represents an unacceptable legal or business risk.

- **Financial Viability** ▴ This criterion assesses the vendor’s financial stability to ensure they can remain a going concern throughout the life of the contract. It might involve specifying a minimum annual revenue, a positive credit rating, or other financial health indicators.

- **Technical Prerequisites** ▴ This involves non-negotiable technical capabilities or architectural requirements. For a software procurement, this could be compatibility with a specific operating system, support for a mandatory API protocol, or adherence to defined data security standards.

- **Operational Capacity and Experience** ▴ This gate verifies that the vendor has a proven track record and the necessary scale to deliver. Requirements might include a minimum number of years in business, a certain number of active clients of a similar scale, or case studies demonstrating successful implementation in a comparable environment.

> A well-designed pass/fail structure acts as the procurement system’s primary immune response, identifying and neutralizing incompatible proposals before they can consume organizational resources.

![Abstract spheres and a sharp disc depict an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives ecosystem. A central Principal's Operational Framework interacts with a Liquidity Pool via RFQ Protocol for High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## The Hybrid Model Interplay

In a [hybrid evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-implications-of-using-an-ambiguous-evaluation-criteria-in-a-hybrid-rfp-rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) framework, the pass/fail criteria work in concert with a subsequent weighted scoring model. The relationship between these two components is sequential and hierarchical. The pass/fail section acts as the resolute gatekeeper; the weighted scoring section performs the nuanced comparative analysis on those who are permitted entry. This structure provides the best of both worlds ▴ the unyielding clarity of absolute standards and the flexible, detailed comparison of qualitative and quantitative factors.

The strategic advantage of this dual-system approach is significant. It prevents a common pitfall in purely weighted scoring systems, where a vendor’s exceptional performance in one area (e.g. very low cost) could compensate for a critical deficiency in another (e.g. weak security protocols). The pass/fail mechanism isolates these critical deficiencies, ensuring they lead to disqualification, regardless of other strengths. This enforces a “best value” paradigm that is grounded in a non-negotiable definition of what constitutes an acceptable solution.

The table below illustrates the strategic positioning of pass/fail criteria versus weighted scoring criteria within a [hybrid RFP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/hybrid-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for a cloud-based data analytics platform.

### Table 1 ▴ Strategic Differentiation of Evaluation Criteria

| Criterion Type | Example Criterion | Evaluation Method | Strategic Purpose |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Pass/Fail | ISO 27001 Certification | Binary (Yes/No) | To eliminate any vendor that cannot meet the foundational, non-negotiable data security standard required by corporate policy. |
| Pass/Fail | Demonstrated financial solvency for the past three fiscal years. | Binary (Pass/Fail) | To mitigate the risk of contracting with a financially unstable partner who may cease operations or fail to invest in product development. |
| Weighted Score (30%) | User Interface and Ease of Use | Scored (1-10) | To assess the relative quality of the user experience, acknowledging that this is a desirable but subjective attribute where different levels of performance are acceptable. |
| Weighted Score (20%) | Scalability and Performance Benchmarks | Scored (1-10) | To compare the performance capabilities of compliant vendors, recognizing that higher performance is better but a range of performance levels may be acceptable. |
| Weighted Score (50%) | Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | Formula-based Score | To evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of the qualified solutions, ensuring price is a significant factor but only after foundational requirements are met. |

This staggered evaluation process ensures that the conversation about price and advanced features only begins after a baseline of trust and compliance has been firmly established. It is a disciplined approach that aligns procurement outcomes with overarching business strategy, ensuring that every selected partner is built upon a foundation of mandatory, non-negotiable strengths.

![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

![Abstract spheres on a fulcrum symbolize Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. A small white sphere represents a multi-leg spread, balanced by a large reflective blue sphere for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-dynamic-balance-for-optimal-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a pass/fail criterion within a hybrid RFP evaluation is a matter of procedural precision and systemic integration. It requires translating strategic intent into a functional, auditable, and defensible workflow. This phase moves from the “what” and “why” to the “how,” detailing the operational mechanics of implementing these criteria from RFP drafting to final vendor down-selection.

![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Operational Playbook for Implementation

A robust implementation process follows a clear, sequential path to ensure fairness, transparency, and efficiency. The process can be broken down into distinct stages, each with its own set of actions and responsibilities.

- **Criterion Finalization and Documentation** ▴ 

<li>**Stakeholder Consensus** ▴ The evaluation committee, comprising representatives from all relevant departments, must formally sign off on the final list of pass/fail criteria. This ensures collective ownership and prevents disputes during the evaluation phase.

- **Clear RFP Language** ▴ Each criterion must be articulated in the RFP document with absolute clarity, leaving no room for interpretation. The language should be direct and specify the exact evidence required for a “pass” (e.g. “Vendor must provide a copy of their valid ISO 27001 certificate,” not “Vendor should describe their security practices.”).

- **Response Formatting** ▴ The RFP should designate a specific section for responses to pass/fail criteria, often a simple checklist or a form, to facilitate rapid, consistent evaluation.

</li>
- **Initial Proposal Triage (The Pass/Fail Gate)** ▴ 

<li>**Administrative Review** ▴ Upon receipt, the procurement lead performs an initial administrative check to ensure proposals are complete and submitted on time.

- **Dedicated Pass/Fail Evaluation** ▴ A designated sub-team, often led by the procurement manager and a subject matter expert (e.g. from IT security or legal), conducts the pass/fail assessment. This is a preliminary, standalone step.

- **Binary Judgment** ▴ The evaluation at this stage is strictly binary. A vendor either passes all criteria or they fail. There is no middle ground or partial credit. Any proposal that receives a “fail” on even one criterion is formally eliminated from further consideration.

- **Documentation of Rationale** ▴ For each failed proposal, the exact criterion that was not met is documented. This is critical for providing clear, defensible feedback to unsuccessful vendors and for maintaining a transparent audit trail.

</li>
- **Advancement to Weighted Scoring** ▴ 

<li>**Notification of Advancement** ▴ Only the proposals that have successfully cleared all pass/fail gates are moved forward to the full evaluation committee for the detailed, weighted scoring phase.

- **Isolation of Evaluation Stages** ▴ The results of the subsequent weighted scoring do not affect the initial pass/fail outcome. The two stages are operationally distinct to maintain the integrity of the hybrid model. A high score on technical approach cannot reverse a “fail” on a mandatory compliance item.

</li>

![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

While the pass/fail stage itself is qualitative in its binary judgment, its position within the larger quantitative framework is critical. The execution of this model can be represented in an evaluation workflow that clearly shows the sequential nature of the process and the reduction of the vendor pool at each stage.

> The pass/fail gate is the system’s coarse filter, designed to remove large, unsuitable particles efficiently so that the fine-grained filters of weighted scoring can operate on a pre-qualified substrate.

The following table provides a hypothetical quantitative model of a multi-stage RFP evaluation for a critical software system. It demonstrates how the vendor pool is systematically narrowed, allowing the evaluation team to focus its efforts more intensely at each successive stage.

### Table 2 ▴ Multi-Stage Vendor Evaluation Funnel

| Evaluation Stage | Vendors Under Review | Key Activity | Outcome | Vendors Remaining |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stage 1 ▴ Initial Submission | Vendor A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H | Receipt of all proposals by deadline. | 8 proposals received. | 8 |
| Stage 2 ▴ Pass/Fail Screening | Vendor A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H | Assessment against 5 mandatory criteria (e.g. FedRAMP certification, 5+ years in business, positive Dun & Bradstreet rating). | Vendor C (no certification), Vendor F (in business 3 years), and Vendor H (negative credit watch) are disqualified. | 5 |
| Stage 3 ▴ Technical Scoring (50% Weight) | Vendor A, B, D, E, G | Detailed review of technical architecture, feature set, and implementation plan by the IT team. Scores assigned out of 100. | Scores ▴ A=85, B=92, D=78, E=65, G=88. Vendor E is eliminated for falling below the minimum technical threshold of 70. | 4 |
| Stage 4 ▴ Financial Scoring (30% Weight) | Vendor A, B, D, G | Analysis of pricing models, total cost of ownership, and contractual terms by the finance and legal teams. Scores assigned out of 100. | Scores ▴ A=90, B=75, D=88, G=82. | 4 |
| Stage 5 ▴ Finalist Demonstrations (20% Weight) | Vendor A, B, D, G | Live, scripted product demonstrations to a panel of end-users and stakeholders. Scores assigned out of 100. | Scores ▴ A=88, B=95, D=80, G=75. | 4 |
| Stage 6 ▴ Final Weighted Score Calculation | Vendor A, B, D, G | Calculation of final weighted score ▴ (Technical 0.5) + (Financial 0.3) + (Demo 0.2). | Final Scores ▴ A=87.1, B=88.1, D=81.4, G=83.6. | 1 (Vendor B selected) |

![A symmetrical, angular mechanism with illuminated internal components against a dark background, abstractly representing a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes the market microstructure and algorithmic trading precision essential for RFQ protocols, multi-leg spread strategies, and atomic settlement within a Principal OS framework, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study in System Procurement

Consider a large healthcare system, “Veridian Health,” issuing an RFP for a new electronic health record (EHR) platform. The procurement is complex, with immense operational, financial, and regulatory implications. The evaluation committee, under the guidance of its chief systems architect, designs a hybrid evaluation framework to manage this complexity.

The first gate is a set of five non-negotiable pass/fail criteria. These are ▴ (1) The vendor must have current ONC-ATCB certification for the EHR software. (2) The proposed system must be fully compliant with HIPAA and HITECH regulations, with an independent audit report provided. (3) The vendor must have successfully implemented their system in at least three US hospitals of over 200 beds.

(4) The company must demonstrate positive cash flow for the preceding three fiscal years. (5) The proposed system must support the HL7 FHIR standard for data interoperability.

Veridian Health receives ten proposals. During the initial triage, the pass/fail evaluation team immediately disqualifies four of them. One vendor, a promising startup with an innovative user interface, has not yet completed its ONC-ATCB certification. Another, an established international vendor, cannot provide evidence of three implementations in the US market.

A third vendor fails to provide a complete, audited HIPAA compliance report. The fourth is flagged by the finance team for having negative cash flow for two of the last three years. These disqualifications are decisive. No matter how compelling other parts of their proposals might be, these vendors are removed from consideration, saving the committee hundreds of hours of work.

The remaining six vendors proceed to the weighted scoring rounds. Here, they are meticulously compared on factors like clinical workflow efficiency (40% weight), total cost of ownership (30%), patient engagement tools (15%), and implementation support (15%). The competition is fierce, but the committee operates with the confidence that all contenders have already met the absolute, foundational requirements for a secure, compliant, and viable partnership.

The pass/fail criteria did not select the winner, but they architected the playing field, ensuring that the final contest was between truly worthy adversaries. This structural integrity is the ultimate function of the pass/fail mechanism in execution.

![Stacked precision-engineered circular components, varying in size and color, rest on a cylindrical base. This modular assembly symbolizes a robust Crypto Derivatives OS architecture, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## References

- “A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples.” Responsive, 14 Jan. 2021.

- “How to do RFP scoring ▴ Step-by-step Guide.” Prokuria, 12 June 2025.

- “Pass/Fail Past Performance Evaluation ▴ No Comparison Required.” SmallGovCon, 21 July 2015.

- “12 RFP Evaluation Criteria to Consider in 2025.” Procurement Tactics, 2025.

- “Amended Appendix 6E ▴ REVISED QUALIFICATION (PASS/FAIL) ASSESSMENT.” African Development Bank Group.

![A dark, robust sphere anchors a precise, glowing teal and metallic mechanism with an upward-pointing spire. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, embodying RFQ protocol precision, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Reflection

![Stacked concentric layers, bisected by a precise diagonal line. This abstract depicts the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/multi-layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## The Unseen Architecture of Decision

The pass/fail criterion, in its elegant simplicity, offers a profound reflection on the nature of complex decision-making. It is a testament to the principle that before one can effectively compare the nuances of value, one must first define the boundaries of acceptability. In structuring a [procurement framework](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the questions an organization chooses to make binary and non-negotiable reveal its most deeply held strategic priorities and its unwavering definition of risk. These are the load-bearing walls of the entire structure.

Contemplating your own evaluation frameworks, consider the clarity of these walls. Are the lines between absolute requirements and desirable features distinct and defensible? Does the initial stage of your process effectively shield your analytical resources for the most critical comparisons? The strength of a hybrid evaluation system resides not in the complexity of its weighted scoring models, but in the foundational integrity of its pass/fail gates.

These gates are more than a checklist; they are an operational philosophy, a declaration that some standards are absolute. Mastering this principle is a key component in building a truly resilient and intelligent procurement system.

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A detailed cutaway of a spherical institutional trading system reveals an internal disk, symbolizing a deep liquidity pool. A high-fidelity probe interacts for atomic settlement, reflecting precise RFQ protocol execution within complex market microstructure for digital asset derivatives and Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-revealed.jpg)

## Evaluation Framework

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Framework constitutes a structured, analytical methodology designed for the systematic assessment of performance, efficiency, and risk across complex operational domains within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/hybrid-evaluation-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting abstract geometric planes depict institutional grade RFQ protocols and market microstructure. Speckled surfaces reflect complex order book dynamics and implied volatility, while smooth planes represent high-fidelity execution channels and private quotation systems for digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-digital-asset-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Hybrid Evaluation Model

Meaning ▴ A Hybrid Evaluation Model represents a computational framework that synthesizes disparate data streams and analytical methodologies to assess complex financial constructs, typically involving both quantitative metrics and qualitative or contextual factors. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring defines a computational methodology where multiple input variables are assigned distinct coefficients or weights, reflecting their relative importance, before being aggregated into a single, composite metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pass-fail-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective planes and intersecting elements depict institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central Principal-driven RFQ protocol ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision.jpg)

## Pass/fail Criteria

Meaning ▴ Pass/Fail Criteria define a precise, predetermined set of conditions that must be satisfied for a specific event, transaction, or system state to be deemed acceptable or successful within an automated framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract geometric composition visualizes a sophisticated market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central liquidity aggregation hub facilitates RFQ protocols and high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-execution-framework-for-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-mandates/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Compliance Mandates

Meaning ▴ Compliance Mandates are formal directives and regulatory requirements that dictate the permissible operational conduct for institutions engaged in financial activities, particularly within the nascent and evolving domain of institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-implications-of-using-an-ambiguous-evaluation-criteria-in-a-hybrid-rfp-rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Hybrid Evaluation

Ambiguity in RFP/RFQ evaluation criteria creates legal risk by undermining the implied duty of fairness in the procurement process. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/hybrid-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective and circuit-patterned metallic discs symbolize the Prime RFQ powering institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts deep market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution through RFQ protocols, precise price discovery, and robust algorithmic trading within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-architecture-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-liquidity-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Hybrid Rfp

Meaning ▴ A Hybrid Request for Quote (RFP) represents an advanced protocol designed for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, integrating the structured, bilateral negotiation of a traditional RFQ with dynamic elements derived from real-time market data or continuous liquidity streams. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

## Procurement Framework

Meaning ▴ A Procurement Framework defines a systematic, structured methodology for an institution to acquire external resources, including technology infrastructure, market data services, liquidity provisions, and specialized computational capabilities, essential for supporting its digital asset derivatives operations. </a>

**Tags:** [Hybrid RFP](https://options.greeks.live/area/hybrid-rfp/), [Weighted Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/), [Evaluation Framework](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-framework/), [Procurement Risk Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-risk-management/), [Hybrid Evaluation Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/hybrid-evaluation-model/), [Supplier Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-evaluation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Weight an Rfp Evaluation Matrix to Reflect Its True Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-to-reflect-its-true-priorities/)
![A sleek, spherical white and blue module featuring a central black aperture and teal lens, representing the core Intelligence Layer for Institutional Trading in Digital Asset Derivatives. It visualizes High-Fidelity Execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling precise Price Discovery and optimizing the Principal's Operational Framework for Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

An RFP evaluation matrix is weighted by translating strategic priorities into numerical values to ensure a data-driven, objective procurement decision.

- 
### [How Can a Weighted Scoring Rubric Improve the Objectivity of Rfp Evaluations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-weighted-scoring-rubric-improve-the-objectivity-of-rfp-evaluations/)
![An abstract metallic circular interface with intricate patterns visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol for block trade execution. A central pivot holds a golden pointer with a transparent liquidity pool sphere and a blue pointer, depicting market microstructure optimization and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

A weighted scoring rubric improves RFP objectivity by translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable, defensible evaluation system.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Assign Weights to Different Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-assign-weights-to-different-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A translucent blue sphere is precisely centered within beige, dark, and teal channels. This depicts RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of a block trade within a controlled market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and price discovery on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-pathway-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-market-microstructure.jpg)

The most effective way to assign weights to RFP criteria is to use a structured, collaborative process that translates strategic goals into a quantitative, defensible evaluation model.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks Associated with the Collaborative Phases of a Hybrid Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-associated-with-the-collaborative-phases-of-a-hybrid-rfp/)
![A precisely balanced transparent sphere, representing an atomic settlement or digital asset derivative, rests on a blue cross-structure symbolizing a robust RFQ protocol or execution management system. This setup is anchored to a textured, curved surface, depicting underlying market microstructure or institutional-grade infrastructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimized price discovery, and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-engineered-rfq-block-trade-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A hybrid RFP's collaborative phase risks stem from managing the tension between open innovation and controlled information exchange.

- 
### [What Is the Role of a Cross-Functional Team in the Rfp Model Review Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-cross-functional-team-in-the-rfp-model-review-process/)
![Precision cross-section of an institutional digital asset derivatives system, revealing intricate market microstructure. Toroidal halves represent interconnected liquidity pools, centrally driven by an RFQ protocol. This Prime RFQ architecture enables high-fidelity execution, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-revealing-precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-optimal-high-fidelity-execution-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A cross-functional team acts as an integrated evaluation engine, synthesizing diverse expertise to ensure optimal, risk-mitigated RFP outcomes.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Setting Weights for Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-setting-weights-for-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool. This depicts high-fidelity execution of block trades through RFQ protocols in complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

A robust RFP evaluation system translates strategic intent into a defensible decision by weighting criteria to reflect true value over initial cost.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls When Weighting Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-when-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A precision metallic mechanism with radiating blades and blue accents, representing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, leveraging dark liquidity and smart order routing within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-engine.jpg)

A flawed RFP weighting model is an architectural defect that guarantees a misalignment between procurement outcomes and strategic intent.

- 
### [How Can We Quantify Qualitative Factors in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-quantify-qualitative-factors-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Intersecting angular structures symbolize dynamic market microstructure, multi-leg spread strategies. Translucent spheres represent institutional liquidity blocks, digital asset derivatives, precisely balanced. This illustrates sophisticated RFQ protocol execution, optimal price discovery, capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-4.jpg)

Quantifying qualitative RFP factors involves deconstructing abstract traits into measurable criteria and applying a weighted scoring rubric for objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [How Do You Design an Effective Weighted Scoring Matrix for an Automated Rfp Evaluation System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-design-an-effective-weighted-scoring-matrix-for-an-automated-rfp-evaluation-system/)
![A sleek, futuristic object with a glowing line and intricate metallic core, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine enabling high-fidelity execution, liquidity aggregation, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible vendor selection engine.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Role of a Pass/Fail Criterion in a Hybrid Rfp Evaluation Framework?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-pass-fail-criterion-in-a-hybrid-rfp-evaluation-framework/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-pass-fail-criterion-in-a-hybrid-rfp-evaluation-framework/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Role of a Pass/Fail Criterion in a Hybrid Rfp Evaluation Framework? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A pass/fail criterion is a binary gate that enforces non-negotiable standards, de-risking procurement by filtering out non-compliant vendors first. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-pass-fail-criterion-in-a-hybrid-rfp-evaluation-framework/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T15:21:14+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T15:21:15+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg",
        "caption": "A precisely engineered central hub with four radiating arms illustrates streamlined institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This advanced RFQ system manages multi-leg spread strategies by aggregating diverse liquidity pools. The framework ensures high-fidelity execution and best execution through dynamic price discovery, minimizing slippage and latency. It represents a robust Prime RFQ solution, critical for capital efficiency and atomic settlement in Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Compliance Mandates",
        "Evaluation Framework",
        "Hybrid Evaluation Model",
        "Hybrid RFP",
        "Non-Negotiable Requirements",
        "Pass/Fail Criteria",
        "Procurement Framework",
        "Procurement Risk Management",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Triage",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Evaluation",
        "Vendor Qualification",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-pass-fail-criterion-in-a-hybrid-rfp-evaluation-framework/
