# What Is the Role of Pass/Fail Criteria in a Weighted Scoring Model for an RFP? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Glowing circular forms symbolize institutional liquidity pools and aggregated inquiry nodes for digital asset derivatives. Blue pathways depict RFQ protocol execution and smart order routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-microstructure.jpg)

![Robust polygonal structures depict foundational institutional liquidity pools and market microstructure. Transparent, intersecting planes symbolize high-fidelity execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies and atomic settlement, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols within a controlled dark pool environment, ensuring optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Concept

![A translucent blue sphere is precisely centered within beige, dark, and teal channels. This depicts RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of a block trade within a controlled market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and price discovery on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-pathway-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-market-microstructure.jpg)

## The Unyielding Foundation of Decision Integrity

An evaluation framework for a Request for Proposal (RFP) operates as a sophisticated decision-making apparatus. Within this apparatus, the [weighted scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) represents the nuanced, analytical engine that differentiates qualified vendors based on a spectrum of prioritized attributes. Yet, this engine can only perform its function effectively if it is fed inputs that have already been vetted for fundamental viability. This initial, critical vetting is the precise function of pass/fail criteria.

[These criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-these-realistic-simulations-be-used-to-predict-the-market-impact-of-new-financial-regulations/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) form the bedrock of the entire evaluation structure, a series of non-negotiable gates through which any potential partner must proceed. A failure at this stage is absolute, removing the vendor from consideration before any weighted analysis commences. This mechanism ensures that the resources of the evaluation committee are spent only on proposals that meet the irreducible minimums of operational, legal, and technical competence.

From a systemic viewpoint, pass/fail criteria are the first line of defense against organisational risk. They are binary and absolute by design. A vendor either possesses the mandatory ISO certification, or they do not. They either demonstrate the required years of industry experience, or they fall short.

There is no partial credit. This binary nature provides a clean, unambiguous filter that purifies the pool of candidates. It establishes a baseline of quality and compliance, ensuring that any vendor advancing to the subsequent stage is, at a minimum, a viable contender capable of fulfilling the core mandate. This initial filtration prevents the distortion of the [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) phase, where a high score in a less critical, heavily weighted category might otherwise compensate for a catastrophic failing in a fundamental, non-negotiable area.

> A pass/fail gate serves as a non-negotiable qualifier, ensuring all contenders meet a baseline of mandatory requirements before any nuanced evaluation begins.

The implementation of these criteria introduces a disciplined rigidity into the [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This rigidity is a feature, a structural element that upholds the integrity of the final decision. It insulates the process from subjective influences that might argue for a vendor who “almost” meets a critical security protocol or “nearly” has the required licensing. By codifying these absolute requirements at the outset, the organization defines its operational boundaries.

Any proposal that cannot exist within these boundaries is definitionally unsuitable, regardless of its other merits. This clarity is transmitted to the vendors themselves, who can quickly ascertain their own eligibility and choose whether to invest the significant resources required to prepare a comprehensive proposal. The result is a more efficient process for all participants, channeling effort toward viable partnerships and away from foregone conclusions.

![A sleek, institutional-grade system processes a dynamic stream of market microstructure data, projecting a high-fidelity execution pathway for digital asset derivatives. This represents a private quotation RFQ protocol, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Mandatory Requirements as Systemic Circuit Breakers

Viewing the RFP evaluation process as an electrical system provides a powerful analogy. The weighted scoring categories ▴ such as technical approach, cost, and project management ▴ are the main circuits, designed to carry and distribute the load of the evaluation. The pass/fail criteria, in this context, function as the system’s primary circuit breakers. Their purpose is to protect the entire system from catastrophic failure by interrupting the flow before a damaging input can contaminate the delicate machinery of the weighted analysis.

A proposal lacking a mandatory security clearance, for instance, is akin to a massive power surge. Allowing it into the main evaluation grid would be illogical; it would consume evaluators’ time and create the potential for a flawed outcome, all while carrying a known, disqualifying fault.

These systemic circuit breakers are established based on a deep understanding of the organization’s operational realities and risk posture. They are not arbitrary hurdles but carefully defined prerequisites that reflect immutable business needs. These can be categorized into several distinct classes of requirements:

- **Legal and Regulatory Compliance** ▴ This is perhaps the most straightforward category. It includes requirements for specific licenses, permits, insurance coverage, or adherence to governmental regulations like GDPR or HIPAA. A failure to meet any of these is an immediate disqualification, as it would expose the organization to unacceptable legal and financial risk.

- **Technical and Operational Thresholds** ▴ These criteria ensure a vendor possesses the core capabilities to even begin the work. Examples include possessing specific hardware, supporting a particular software protocol, or meeting a minimum data center uptime percentage. These are the foundational capabilities upon which the proposed solution will be built.

- **Financial Viability** ▴ The organization must ensure that a potential partner is a stable entity. Pass/fail criteria in this domain might include a minimum number of years in business, a positive credit rating, or the submission of audited financial statements. This gate prevents the organization from investing in a partnership that could collapse due to the vendor’s financial instability.

- **Core Experience and Past Performance** ▴ While nuanced experience is often a weighted category, certain baseline qualifications can be set as pass/fail. For instance, a requirement might be that the vendor has completed at least three projects of a similar size and scope. This ensures that the evaluation is not cluttered with submissions from entities that lack a fundamental track record in the required domain.

By segregating these absolute requirements from the preferential, weighted criteria, the evaluation architecture gains both strength and clarity. The pass/fail stage answers the question ▴ “Is this vendor fundamentally capable and compliant?” Only once this question is answered with a definitive affirmative does the process move to the more complex question ▴ “Among the capable and compliant vendors, which offers the best value and strategic fit?” This sequential logic is the hallmark of a mature and robust procurement system.

![A precision-engineered, multi-layered mechanism symbolizing a robust RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its components represent aggregated liquidity, atomic settlement, and high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated market microstructure, enabling efficient price discovery and optimal capital efficiency for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine.jpg)

![Robust institutional-grade structures converge on a central, glowing bi-color orb. This visualizes an RFQ protocol's dynamic interface, representing the Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery within digital asset market microstructure, enabling atomic settlement for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-engine.jpg)

## Strategy

![Two reflective, disc-like structures, one tilted, one flat, symbolize the Market Microstructure of Digital Asset Derivatives. This metaphor encapsulates RFQ Protocols and High-Fidelity Execution within a Liquidity Pool for Price Discovery, vital for a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-optimizing-market-microstructure-principal-trading-best-execution-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Calibrating the Gates for Strategic Alignment

The strategic value of pass/fail criteria is realized long before the first proposal is opened. Their formulation is an act of corporate self-reflection, a process that forces an organization to distinguish between its absolute necessities and its desirable preferences. This distinction is the cornerstone of a successful procurement strategy. When stakeholders are asked to define what constitutes a “pass,” they are compelled to articulate the minimum acceptable parameters for a partnership.

This process itself builds alignment across departments ▴ legal, finance, IT, and operations must come to a consensus on the non-negotiable elements. This pre-emptive alignment is invaluable, preventing internal disagreements during the high-pressure evaluation phase.

A sophisticated strategy involves carefully calibrating the pass/fail gates to match the specific risk and complexity of the procurement. For a low-stakes commodity purchase, the pass/fail criteria might be minimal, perhaps limited to financial viability and ability to deliver. However, for a complex, multi-year technology transformation project, the pass/fail gates will be numerous and formidable.

They will act as a sophisticated filtering mechanism, ensuring that only vendors with a demonstrated capacity for handling such complexity are allowed to compete. This calibration prevents a common procurement pitfall ▴ applying a one-size-fits-all evaluation model to vastly different purchasing scenarios.

The public declaration of these criteria within the RFP document is also a strategic communication tool. It signals to the marketplace that the organization is mature, disciplined, and transparent in its processes. It tells potential bidders exactly what the table stakes are, allowing them to self-select out of the process if they cannot meet the mandatory minimums.

This saves the bidding community time and resources, fostering goodwill and encouraging higher-quality, more relevant proposals from the vendors who do choose to respond. A vendor who sees a clear, logical set of pass/fail criteria is more likely to view the process as fair and objective, motivating them to invest their best efforts in their proposal.

![Abstractly depicting an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives ecosystem. A robust base supports intersecting conduits, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and smart order routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-optimization.jpg)

## Protecting the Weighted Model from Dilution

A weighted [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a powerful tool for comparative analysis, but its precision is easily compromised. Without the protective barrier of a pass/fail stage, the model is susceptible to a critical flaw ▴ the possibility of a high score in a heavily weighted but non-essential category masking a fatal deficiency in a mandatory area. Consider a vendor bidding on a cloud services contract.

The vendor might offer an exceptionally low price, which is weighted at 40% of the total score. This low price could earn them so many points that it propels them to the top of the rankings, even if they fail to meet a mandatory, but unweighted, data encryption standard.

The pass/fail criteria act as an inviolable firewall, preventing this kind of distortion. By handling the [mandatory requirements](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mandatory-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in a separate, antecedent step, the system ensures that the weighted scoring is only applied to a pool of already-qualified candidates. The evaluation then becomes a true comparison of relative merits among peers, rather than a flawed exercise in balancing virtues against fundamental incapacities.

This preserves the mathematical integrity of the weighted model. The weights assigned to categories like price, technical solution, and customer service can be set with the confidence that any vendor being scored has already cleared the fundamental hurdles of security, compliance, and viability.

> The sequential application of pass/fail criteria before weighted scoring preserves the mathematical purity of the evaluation, ensuring that preferential attributes are only compared among fundamentally viable candidates.

The table below illustrates the strategic difference between an integrated scoring model and a superior, two-stage model that incorporates a [pass/fail gate](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pass-fail-gate/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). In this scenario, the RFP is for a critical data processing service where SOC 2 Type II compliance is a non-negotiable requirement.

| Evaluation Model Type | Vendor A | Vendor B | Strategic Outcome |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Integrated (Flawed) Model SOC 2 Compliance is just one of many scored items. | SOC 2 Compliance ▴ No (0 points) Price (40% weight) ▴ $100K (100 points) Features (30% weight) ▴ Excellent (95 points) Total Score ▴ 78.5 | SOC 2 Compliance ▴ Yes (100 points) Price (40% weight) ▴ $150K (70 points) Features (30% weight) ▴ Good (80 points) Total Score ▴ 77.0 | Vendor A appears to be the winner, despite a critical, deal-breaking compliance failure. The model has produced a misleading and high-risk result. |
| Two-Stage (Superior) Model SOC 2 Compliance is a Pass/Fail gate. | Stage 1 (Pass/Fail) ▴ SOC 2 Compliance ▴ FAIL Vendor is disqualified and removed from consideration. | Stage 1 (Pass/Fail) ▴ SOC 2 Compliance ▴ PASS Vendor proceeds to weighted scoring. | Only compliant vendors are evaluated, ensuring the integrity of the process. The organization is protected from selecting a non-compliant partner, regardless of other attractive features. |

This structural separation of concerns is the key. It allows the evaluation team to focus their efforts. During the pass/fail review, the question is simple and direct for each criterion ▴ “Yes or No?” During the weighted scoring phase, the team can engage in a more nuanced debate about the relative quality of features, service levels, and strategic alignment, secure in the knowledge that they are building upon a solid foundation of compliance and capability.

![Abstract dark reflective planes and white structural forms are illuminated by glowing blue conduits and circular elements. This visualizes an institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency via advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

![Abstract geometric forms in blue and beige represent institutional liquidity pools and market segments. A metallic rod signifies RFQ protocol connectivity for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Execution

![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Constructing the Foundational Gates

The execution of a pass/fail system requires meticulous planning and unambiguous language. The criteria must be defined with such precision that there is no room for interpretation. Vague statements like “must have sufficient experience” are an invitation to ambiguity and dispute.

A well-constructed criterion would instead read ▴ “The vendor must demonstrate the successful completion of at least five (5) projects of a similar scope and a value of at least $1,000,000 each within the last three (3) years.” This level of specificity leaves no doubt. The evidence is either present in the proposal, or it is not.

The process of constructing these gates should follow a clear, auditable path:

- **Stakeholder Consultation** ▴ Convene a cross-functional team including representatives from legal, finance, IT, security, and the primary business unit sponsoring the RFP. This group will brainstorm the full universe of potential requirements.

- **Requirement Categorization** ▴ Sort the brainstormed list into two distinct buckets ▴ “Mandatory” and “Preferential.” This is a critical step that requires rigorous debate. A requirement is only mandatory if the project’s success is impossible without it. If a workaround exists or if its absence would be merely inconvenient, it belongs in the preferential bucket, where it can be handled by the weighted scoring model.

- **Precise Definition** ▴ Each mandatory requirement must be translated into a clear, verifiable, and binary statement. The statement must articulate what evidence a vendor must provide to be deemed compliant. This could be a certificate, a financial statement, a client reference, or a specific answer to a direct question.

- **RFP Documentation** ▴ The pass/fail criteria must be published prominently in the RFP document. They should be presented in a distinct section, often as a checklist, before the details of the weighted scoring criteria are introduced. This placement signals their primacy in the evaluation sequence. The language should explicitly state that failure to meet any single pass/fail criterion will result in the immediate disqualification of the entire proposal.

- **Evaluation Team Briefing** ▴ Before the evaluation period begins, the scoring committee must be briefed on the strict application of the pass/fail criteria. They must understand that this is a mechanical, objective check, not a subjective assessment. The process should be to first review all proposals against only the pass/fail checklist. Only those proposals that pass this initial gate should be distributed for the full, in-depth weighted review.

This disciplined execution ensures that the pass/fail stage functions as intended ▴ a clean, efficient, and defensible mechanism for establishing a pool of qualified candidates. It transforms the initial phase of evaluation from a potentially chaotic reading of disparate documents into a structured, almost clerical, verification process. This is efficiency. This is control.

![A polished, cut-open sphere reveals a sharp, luminous green prism, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework. The reflective interior denotes market microstructure insights and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-alpha-intelligence.jpg)

## An Operational View of the Evaluation Sequence

To fully grasp the operational flow, consider the acquisition of a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. The evaluation committee has established a series of pass/fail criteria to form the initial gate. Following this, a detailed weighted scoring model will assess the nuances of the qualified solutions. The table below provides a concrete example of how these criteria are structured and applied.

| Criterion Type | Specific Pass/Fail Criterion | Required Evidence | Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Financial Viability | Vendor must have a minimum of $50 million in annual revenue. | Audited financial statements for the past three fiscal years. | Ensures the partner is financially stable enough to support a long-term, mission-critical system. |
| Regulatory Compliance | The proposed solution must be fully compliant with GDPR. | Third-party compliance certificate and detailed data residency information. | A non-negotiable legal requirement to avoid massive fines and reputational damage. |
| Technical Capability | The system must offer a native API for integration with Salesforce. | Link to public API documentation and a successful test call demonstration. | Core operational requirement for the business’s sales and service functions. |
| Past Performance | Vendor must have at least two referenceable clients in the manufacturing sector with over 1,000 employees. | Contact information for two client references meeting the description. | Guarantees the vendor has experience with the scale and specific challenges of the organization’s industry. |
| Support Infrastructure | Vendor must provide 24/7/365 technical support with a maximum 1-hour response time for critical issues. | A signed Service Level Agreement (SLA) document explicitly stating these terms. | The ERP system is a core utility; continuous operational support is a mandatory baseline of service. |

During the execution of the evaluation, an administrator or a junior member of the evaluation team can perform the initial pass/fail check on all incoming proposals. Let’s say five proposals are received. The administrator creates a simple checklist based on the table above for each vendor. Vendor A fails to provide audited financials.

Vendor C cannot produce the required manufacturing references. Both proposals are immediately archived and removed from the main evaluation pool. The evaluation committee never even sees them. Their time and cognitive energy are reserved for the three vendors who successfully passed through all the foundational gates.

Now, the complex work of weighted scoring can begin on a solid, pre-qualified foundation. The committee can now debate the finer points of user interface design, implementation methodology, and total cost of ownership, confident that any choice they make will be from a pool of fundamentally sound partners. This is the essence of a well-architected decision process ▴ it separates the absolute from the relative, the mandatory from the preferential, creating a system that is both ruthlessly efficient and strategically robust. The intellectual grappling with a decision’s nuances is a precious resource; the pass/fail mechanism is the system that protects that resource from being wasted on non-starters. It is the silent, disciplined guardian of strategic focus.

> By clearly separating mandatory prerequisites from preferential attributes, the evaluation process gains immense efficiency and analytical rigor.

The structural integrity of this approach provides a powerful defense against challenges, both internal and external. If a senior executive favors a particular vendor who was disqualified, the evaluation committee can point to the clear, pre-defined, and objective criterion that the vendor failed to meet. The conversation shifts from subjective preference to a factual discussion of the organization’s own stated mandatory requirements. Similarly, if a disqualified vendor protests the decision, the organization can provide a transparent and unambiguous reason for their removal from the process, grounded in the rules that were published to all participants from the outset.

This level of procedural correctness is vital in public sector procurement and highly valuable in private enterprise for maintaining fair and productive supplier relationships. It is the system’s architecture that provides this strength.

![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## References

- Schoenherr, Tobias, and Vincent A. Mabert. “A comprehensive framework for the evaluation and selection of strategic suppliers.” Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management 5.2 (2011) ▴ 75-151.

- Bhutta, Khurrum S. and F. H. A. Y. U. N. Huq. “Supplier selection problem ▴ a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process.” Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal 7.3 (2002) ▴ 126-135.

- de Boer, L. Labro, E. & Morlacchi, P. (2001). “A review of methods supporting supplier selection.” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(2), 75-89.

- Government of New Zealand. “Decide on your evaluation methodology.” New Zealand Government Procurement and Property, 2023.

- Utley, Meradith. “The Most Important RFP Section.” Utley Strategies, 16 Mar. 2021.

- Responsive. “A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples.” Responsive, 14 Jan. 2021.

- Richter & Company. “Solid Non-Cost Evaluations Analyze Competition Effectively.” Richter & Company, 12 May 2022.

- Timmerman, Ed. “An approach to vendor selection.” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 22.4 (1986) ▴ 2-8.

![A detailed cutaway of a spherical institutional trading system reveals an internal disk, symbolizing a deep liquidity pool. A high-fidelity probe interacts for atomic settlement, reflecting precise RFQ protocol execution within complex market microstructure for digital asset derivatives and Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-revealed.jpg)

## Reflection

![A pristine teal sphere, symbolizing an optimal RFQ block trade or specific digital asset derivative, rests within a sophisticated institutional execution framework. A black algorithmic routing interface divides this principal's position from a granular grey surface, representing dynamic market microstructure and latent liquidity, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-precision-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## The Architecture of Confidence

The mechanism of evaluation, when properly constructed, becomes more than a tool for selection. It evolves into an architecture for organizational confidence. The deliberate and disciplined separation of pass/fail prerequisites from weighted, preferential scoring is the blueprint for this architecture. It provides a clear, defensible, and logical pathway from a broad field of possibilities to a single, strategic partnership.

Contemplating this structure invites a deeper inquiry into an organization’s own decision-making protocols. Are the lines between absolute needs and desirable wants clearly drawn? Does the current process protect the valuable, nuanced work of strategic evaluation from the distraction of non-viable options?

The strength of a procurement decision is not found in the complexity of its weighting algorithm alone. It is located in the structural integrity of the entire evaluation system, beginning with its foundational gates. A commitment to defining and enforcing these gates is a commitment to clarity, efficiency, and [risk mitigation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

It is the operational embodiment of strategic intent, ensuring that every partnership is built upon a verified foundation of capability and compliance. The ultimate output is not just a signed contract, but a justifiable and robust business outcome.

![Stacked modular components with a sharp fin embody Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives. This represents High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, enabling Price Discovery, optimizing Capital Efficiency, and managing Gamma Exposure within an Institutional Prime RFQ for Block Trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-system-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate core of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcasing precision platters symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and a high-fidelity execution arm. This depicts robust principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocol processing and market microstructure for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-execution-system.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Model defines a quantitative analytical tool used to evaluate and prioritize multiple alternatives by assigning different levels of importance, or weights, to various evaluation criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-these-realistic-simulations-be-used-to-predict-the-market-impact-of-new-financial-regulations/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An opaque principal's operational framework half-sphere interfaces a translucent digital asset derivatives sphere, revealing implied volatility. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol, enabling private quotation within the market microstructure and deep liquidity pool for a robust Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-13.jpg)

## These Criteria

Realistic simulations provide a systemic laboratory to forecast the emergent, second-order effects of new financial regulations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A Prime RFQ engine's central hub integrates diverse multi-leg spread strategies and institutional liquidity streams. Distinct blades represent Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, showcasing high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spread-high-fidelity-execution-with-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process, within the systems architecture and operational framework of a crypto-native or crypto-investing institution, defines the structured sequence of activities involved in acquiring goods, services, or digital assets from external vendors or liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mandatory-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A teal and white sphere precariously balanced on a light grey bar, itself resting on an angular base, depicts market microstructure at a critical price discovery point. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency and risk aggregation within a Principal trading desk's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-strategy.jpg)

## Mandatory Requirements

Meaning ▴ Mandatory Requirements are non-negotiable specifications or conditions that a system, process, or component must satisfy to be considered functional, compliant, or acceptable. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pass-fail-gate/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A symmetrical, angular mechanism with illuminated internal components against a dark background, abstractly representing a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes the market microstructure and algorithmic trading precision essential for RFQ protocols, multi-leg spread strategies, and atomic settlement within a Principal OS framework, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Pass/fail Gate

Meaning ▴ A Pass/fail Gate, in the context of crypto systems architecture and project management, represents a critical checkpoint within a development or deployment lifecycle where a predefined set of criteria must be met before progression to the next phase. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dynamic composition depicts an institutional-grade RFQ pipeline connecting a vast liquidity pool to a split circular element representing price discovery and implied volatility. This visual metaphor highlights the precision of an execution management system for digital asset derivatives via private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-pipeline-for-precise-price-discovery-and-volatility-surface-analysis.jpg)

## Risk Mitigation

Meaning ▴ Risk Mitigation, within the intricate systems architecture of crypto investing and trading, encompasses the systematic strategies and processes designed to reduce the probability or impact of identified risks to an acceptable level. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/), [Non-Compensatory Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-compensatory-evaluation/), [Mandatory Requirements](https://options.greeks.live/area/mandatory-requirements/), [Pass/fail Gate](https://options.greeks.live/area/pass-fail-gate/), [Compliance Verification](https://options.greeks.live/area/compliance-verification/), [Supplier Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-selection/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Quantify Subjective Criteria in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-quantify-subjective-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A precise mechanical interaction between structured components and a central dark blue element. This abstract representation signifies high-fidelity execution of institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and minimizing slippage within robust market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

Quantifying subjective RFP criteria involves translating qualitative judgments into a weighted scoring system for objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Risks Associated with a Collaborative Rfp and How Can They Be Mitigated?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-risks-associated-with-a-collaborative-rfp-and-how-can-they-be-mitigated/)
![A sleek, dark reflective sphere is precisely intersected by two flat, light-toned blades, creating an intricate cross-sectional design. This visually represents institutional digital asset derivatives' market microstructure, where RFQ protocols enable high-fidelity execution and price discovery within dark liquidity pools, ensuring capital efficiency and managing counterparty risk via advanced Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

A collaborative RFP's risks are mitigated by architecting a unified governance protocol and a data-driven evaluation framework before vendor engagement.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Price-Centric and a Value-Driven Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-price-centric-and-a-value-driven-rfp-evaluation/)
![Symmetrical precision modules around a central hub represent a Principal-led RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and block trade aggregation within a robust market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and capital efficiency via a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-led-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

A price-centric RFP evaluation minimizes initial cost; a value-driven model maximizes long-term strategic capability and worth.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls When Setting Weights in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-when-setting-weights-in-an-rfp/)
![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

A Request for Proposal's weighting system translates strategic priorities into a defensible decision-making architecture.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Scoring Criteria in an Rfp Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-scoring-criteria-in-an-rfp-rubric/)
![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency. The Prime RFQ underpins algorithmic trading, minimizing latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

A weighted RFP rubric translates strategic priorities into a mathematical framework for objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Structure a Scoring Rubric for an RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-structure-a-scoring-rubric-for-an-rfp/)
![A symmetrical, intricate digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its metallic and translucent elements visualize a robust RFQ protocol facilitating multi-leg spread execution. This system optimizes market microstructure and price discovery, ensuring high-fidelity execution and aggregated inquiry for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

An effective RFP rubric is a quantitative framework that translates strategic priorities into a defensible, data-driven selection decision.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight for Price in a Complex Technology Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-for-price-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/)
![A beige spool feeds dark, reflective material into an advanced processing unit, illuminated by a vibrant blue light. This depicts high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives through a Prime RFQ, enabling precise price discovery for aggregated RFQ inquiries within complex market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-3.jpg)

The optimal price weight in a tech RFP is a dynamic calibration that subordinates initial cost to the systemic value of quality and risk.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in the Evaluation Criteria between a Request for Proposal and a Request for Quote?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-evaluation-criteria-between-a-request-for-proposal-and-a-request-for-quote/)
![Parallel marked channels depict granular market microstructure across diverse institutional liquidity pools. A glowing cyan ring highlights an active Request for Quote RFQ for precise price discovery. A metallic probe signifies an algorithmic trading engine performing high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-3.jpg)

An RFQ's evaluation is a quantitative validation of price, while an RFP's is a qualitative assessment of value and strategic fit.

- 
### [What Are the Key Components of a Robust RFP Scoring Guide?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-components-of-a-robust-rfp-scoring-guide/)
![Abstract, sleek components, a dark circular disk and intersecting translucent blade, represent the precise Market Microstructure of an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ engine. It embodies High-Fidelity Execution, Algorithmic Trading, and optimized Price Discovery within a robust Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-rfq-system-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

A robust RFP scoring guide is a system for translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable, objective, and auditable procurement decision.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Role of Pass/Fail Criteria in a Weighted Scoring Model for an RFP?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-pass-fail-criteria-in-a-weighted-scoring-model-for-an-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-pass-fail-criteria-in-a-weighted-scoring-model-for-an-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Role of Pass/Fail Criteria in a Weighted Scoring Model for an RFP? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Pass/fail criteria act as a foundational, binary filter in an RFP model, ensuring operational integrity by disqualifying non-compliant vendors before nuanced, weighted scoring begins. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-pass-fail-criteria-in-a-weighted-scoring-model-for-an-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T06:19:09+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T06:14:26+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-3.jpg",
        "caption": "A precise, engineered mechanism featuring intricate channels and a metallic probe interacts with foundational components and a digital asset derivative representation. This system embodies the market microstructure underpinning institutional-grade RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution of block trades. It enables advanced algorithmic trading and delta hedging for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, ensuring best execution and optimizing portfolio margin within a Prime RFQ."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Compliance Verification",
        "Evaluation Methodology",
        "Mandatory Requirements",
        "Non-Compensatory Evaluation",
        "Pass/fail Gate",
        "Procurement Process",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Risk Mitigation",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-pass-fail-criteria-in-a-weighted-scoring-model-for-an-rfp/
