# What Is the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Defining RFP Evaluation Criteria? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, institutional grade apparatus, central to a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases high-fidelity execution. Its RFQ protocol channels extend to a stylized liquidity pool, enabling price discovery across complex market microstructure for capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-derivatives-prime-os-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

![Abstract geometric forms in blue and beige represent institutional liquidity pools and market segments. A metallic rod signifies RFQ protocol connectivity for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Concept

The formulation of Request for Proposal (RFP) [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is frequently perceived as a procedural formality, a mere administrative step in a larger procurement cycle. This perspective, however, misses the fundamental nature of the activity. The criteria are not a simple checklist; they constitute the core logic of a strategic acquisition system. They are the codified representation of an organization’s values, priorities, and objectives, functioning as the primary mechanism for translating abstract goals into a concrete decision-making framework.

The role of [stakeholder engagement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/stakeholder-engagement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) within this context is paramount. It is the distributed, collaborative process of programming this decision-making engine. Through this engagement, the varied, and often competing, requirements of the entire enterprise are gathered, synthesized, and transformed into a unified, coherent set of operational directives that guide the selection process with precision and purpose.

Effective stakeholder engagement moves the act of defining evaluation criteria from a back-office procurement task into a vital strategic exercise. It functions as an organizational nervous system, transmitting critical information from peripheral operational units to the central procurement function. An end-user in marketing possesses intimate knowledge of the workflow frictions a new software must alleviate. A finance department representative understands the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO) implications beyond the sticker price, considering factors like integration debt and ongoing maintenance.

The IT security team holds non-negotiable requirements for data handling and compliance that must be embedded into the system’s architecture. Without a structured mechanism to capture and integrate these disparate, yet equally critical, perspectives, the resulting evaluation criteria will be incomplete, leading to a selection that optimizes for one dimension at the expense of others. This can result in acquiring a tool that is inexpensive but functionally inadequate, or one that is feature-rich but poses an unacceptable security risk.

> Stakeholder engagement is the essential process that converts diverse organizational intelligence into a unified and effective procurement decision matrix.

The process itself builds a critical institutional capability. By systematically engaging individuals across departments, the organization develops a more holistic understanding of its own operational dependencies. It forces a dialogue that bridges departmental silos, compelling teams to articulate their needs in the context of the wider organization’s success. This collaborative effort ensures that the final RFP is not merely a document representing the procurement department’s interpretation of needs, but a comprehensive blueprint reflecting a collective, cross-functional agreement on what constitutes value.

Consequently, the evaluation criteria become a direct reflection of this shared understanding. Each criterion, and its assigned weight, represents a negotiated settlement between stakeholder priorities, ensuring the final selection is defensible, aligned with overarching strategy, and far more likely to be adopted successfully by the very stakeholders who helped shape its selection.

![Two sleek, pointed objects intersect centrally, forming an 'X' against a dual-tone black and teal background. This embodies the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating optimal price discovery and efficient cross-asset trading within a robust Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure.jpg)

![A sleek, futuristic apparatus featuring a central spherical processing unit flanked by dual reflective surfaces and illuminated data conduits. This system visually represents an advanced RFQ protocol engine facilitating high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-options-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-interface.jpg)

## Strategy

![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

## A Framework for Systematic Stakeholder Analysis

A successful strategy for engaging stakeholders in the definition of [RFP evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) begins with a structured approach to identifying and categorizing them. An ad-hoc process risks giving undue weight to the most vocal participants while overlooking those with critical, albeit less forcefully expressed, insights. The objective is to create a systemic map of the stakeholder landscape. A highly effective tool for this is the Power/Interest Grid, often attributed to Aubrey Mendelow.

This matrix compels the procurement lead or project manager to analyze stakeholders along two key dimensions ▴ their level of interest in the project’s outcome and their degree of power or influence over it. This analysis provides the foundation for a tailored engagement strategy, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and that each group is managed in a manner appropriate to its position within the organizational context.

This analytical framework segments stakeholders into four distinct quadrants, each demanding a different strategic response:

- **High Power, High Interest (Manage Closely)** ▴ These are the key players. This group typically includes the project sponsor, key executives, and the primary end-users or department heads. Their active participation and buy-in are critical for success. The strategy for this group is intensive collaboration. They must be deeply involved in workshops for defining and weighting criteria. 

- **High Power, Low Interest (Keep Satisfied)** ▴ This quadrant often contains individuals like the head of finance or legal, who may not be involved in the day-to-day use of the solution but have the authority to veto decisions. Their interest is conditional, often focused on compliance, budget adherence, or risk. The strategy here is proactive communication and consultation on their specific areas of concern, ensuring their requirements are met without burdening them with the full scope of the project’s details. 

- **Low Power, High Interest (Keep Informed)** ▴ This group includes the broader pool of end-users who will work with the selected solution daily. While they may lack formal power in the decision-making process, their adoption is crucial for realizing the project’s value. The strategy is to keep them informed of progress and to solicit their feedback on usability and workflow, making them feel heard and valued. 

- **Low Power, Low Interest (Monitor)** ▴ These are stakeholders with a peripheral connection to the project. The strategy is minimal effort, typically involving general communications like company-wide newsletters or intranet updates. 

![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

## The Multi-Phase Engagement Protocol

With a clear map of the stakeholders, the engagement can proceed through a structured, multi-phase protocol designed to translate their diverse needs into a cohesive set of evaluation criteria. This protocol ensures a logical progression from broad requirements gathering to a precise, quantitative scoring model.

![Abstract geometric planes delineate distinct institutional digital asset derivatives liquidity pools. Stark contrast signifies market microstructure shift via advanced RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-execution-protocol-integrating-rfq-liquidity-and-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Phase 1 Stakeholder Identification and Needs Assessment

The initial phase is dedicated to discovery. It involves not only identifying the individuals and groups mapped in the Power/Interest Grid but also conducting a deep analysis of their specific needs, objectives, and potential concerns. This is achieved through a combination of methods, including one-on-one interviews with high-power stakeholders, structured workshops with key user groups, and broader surveys to capture sentiment from a wider audience. The goal is to create a comprehensive inventory of requirements, which can then be categorized.

For instance, in procuring a new enterprise software platform, these requirements would be sorted into logical domains like technical specifications, functional capabilities, support services, security protocols, and financial constraints. The table below illustrates a typical [stakeholder analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/stakeholder-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for such a project.

### Stakeholder Analysis for Enterprise Software Procurement

| Stakeholder Group | Primary Interest | Level of Influence | Key Contribution to Criteria |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Executive Sponsor (e.g. COO) | Strategic alignment, ROI, business transformation | High | Defines high-level business outcomes, vendor viability, long-term partnership potential |
| End-User Departments (e.g. Sales, HR) | Functionality, ease of use, workflow efficiency | Medium | Specific functional requirements, usability, reporting capabilities |
| IT Department | Integration, security, scalability, maintainability | High | Technical architecture, data security compliance, integration APIs, support SLAs |
| Finance Department | Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), budget adherence, payment terms | High | Pricing structure, licensing model, implementation costs, ongoing support fees |
| Legal & Compliance | Contractual risk, data privacy (e.g. GDPR), regulatory compliance | High | Contract terms and conditions, data residency, liability clauses |

![Abstract system interface on a global data sphere, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing circuits represent market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, facilitating price discovery and capital efficiency across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Phase 2 Criteria Formulation and Weighting

This phase translates the collected needs into a structured set of evaluation criteria. A crucial element of this stage is the collaborative assignment of weights to each criterion or category of criteria. Weighting is the mechanism by which the organization formally expresses its priorities. A facilitated workshop with the “Manage Closely” stakeholder group is the ideal forum for this exercise.

Using a method like budget allocation, where stakeholders are given 100 points to distribute among the main criteria categories, forces a conversation about trade-offs. The IT department might initially argue for a heavy weighting on [technical architecture](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), while the end-users advocate for functionality. The facilitated process compels them to negotiate a balance that reflects the overall best interest of the organization. This prevents a situation where a technically elegant solution that fails to meet core business needs is selected, or vice versa. The outcome is a scoring model that is both comprehensive and representative of a collective strategic decision.

![A sharp, dark, precision-engineered element, indicative of a targeted RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, traverses a secure liquidity aggregation conduit. This interaction occurs within a robust market microstructure platform, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement under a Principal's operational framework for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

![Engineered components in beige, blue, and metallic tones form a complex, layered structure. This embodies the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol framework for optimizing price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and managing counterparty risk within multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-optimization.jpg)

## Execution

![A dynamic central nexus of concentric rings visualizes Prime RFQ aggregation for digital asset derivatives. Four intersecting light beams delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution venues, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-hub-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Collaborative Criteria Definition

Executing a stakeholder-driven process for defining [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) criteria requires a disciplined, step-by-step approach. This playbook outlines a sequence of actions designed to ensure a rigorous, transparent, and effective outcome. It transforms the strategic concepts of engagement into a tangible workflow that any procurement or project team can implement.

- **Establish the [Cross-Functional Team](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cross-functional-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The first operational step is to formally assemble the core evaluation team. This group should be a direct reflection of the “High Power, High Interest” quadrant of the stakeholder map. It must include a designated project lead (often from procurement), the project sponsor, and representatives from every key functional area (e.g. IT, finance, and primary user departments). Each member’s role, responsibilities, and expected time commitment must be clearly defined in a project charter. This charter serves as the foundational document for the project, codifying its objectives and the authority of the team. 

- **Conduct a Scoping Workshop** ▴ The chartered team’s first formal activity is a scoping workshop. The objective of this session is to achieve a unified understanding of the problem that the procurement aims to solve. This is not yet about defining solutions or criteria, but about defining the business problem and the desired future state. The facilitator should guide the team to produce a concise problem statement and a list of high-level project goals. For example, a goal might be “Reduce the manual effort required for monthly financial reporting by 50%” rather than “Purchase new accounting software.” This focus on outcomes ensures that the subsequent criteria are tied to measurable business value. 

- **Execute the [Needs Assessment](https://prime.greeks.live/area/needs-assessment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Armed with a clear scope, the team undertakes the broader needs assessment. This involves executing the engagement strategies defined in the stakeholder analysis. Team members conduct interviews with other key figures, user groups are brought in for focus groups, and surveys may be deployed. All findings are meticulously documented and collected in a central repository. This raw data forms the input for the next, most critical workshop. 

- **Facilitate the Criteria Definition and Weighting Workshop** ▴ This is the central event of the process. A skilled, neutral facilitator is highly recommended. The workshop should follow a structured agenda:

<li>**Brainstorming** ▴ All collected needs are presented, and the team brainstorms a comprehensive list of potential evaluation criteria. No idea is discarded at this stage.

- **Categorization and Refinement** ▴ The brainstormed list is organized into logical categories (e.g. Technical, Functional, Vendor Profile, Cost). Redundant or vague criteria are consolidated or clarified. Each criterion is rephrased to be as specific and measurable as possible. For instance, “Good support” becomes “Access to 24/7 phone support with a maximum 1-hour response time for critical issues.”

- **Weighting** ▴ The team collaboratively assigns weights to each category and, if desired, to individual criteria within them. The facilitator should enforce a disciplined process, such as the 100-point allocation method, to ensure a realistic distribution of priorities. This is where intense negotiation occurs, and the facilitator’s role is to guide the team to a consensus that reflects the project’s chartered goals.

</li>
- **Develop the [Scoring Rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Following the workshop, the project lead translates the weighted criteria into a formal scoring rubric. For each criterion, a scale (e.g. 1 to 5) is defined, with a clear description of what constitutes each score. This is a vital step for objectivity. A score of ‘5’ for a specific functional requirement might be “Meets requirement out-of-the-box with no configuration,” while a ‘3’ is “Meets requirement with moderate configuration,” and a ‘1’ is “Does not meet requirement.” This rubric removes ambiguity and ensures that all evaluators are scoring proposals against the same standard. 

- **Review, Approve, and Publish** ▴ The final evaluation framework, including the weighted criteria and the detailed scoring rubric, is circulated to the entire cross-functional team for a final review and formal sign-off. This step solidifies their buy-in and accountability. Once approved, the evaluation criteria and their category weights must be included in the RFP document itself. This transparency provides vendors with a clear understanding of what matters most, enabling them to submit more focused and relevant proposals. 

![Central, interlocked mechanical structures symbolize a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS driving institutional RFQ protocol. Surrounding blades represent diverse liquidity pools and multi-leg spread components](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The core of an executable evaluation process is a robust quantitative model. This model ensures that the subjective opinions of evaluators are channeled through a structured, objective framework, leading to a defensible and data-driven decision. The following table represents a detailed Master Evaluation Criteria and Scoring Rubric for a hypothetical procurement of a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform. This table is the ultimate output of the operational playbook described above.

> A well-defined scoring rubric is the mechanism that translates qualitative stakeholder needs into a quantitative, objective, and defensible evaluation.

### Master Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Rubric ▴ CRM Platform RFP

| Category (Weight) | Criterion (Weight) | Description | Scoring Rubric (1-5 Scale) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Functional Capabilities (40%) | Contact & Lead Management (15%) | Ability to manage customer data, track interactions, and score leads based on custom rules. | 5 ▴ Fully native, highly customizable. 3 ▴ Core features native, some customization. 1 ▴ Requires third-party add-on. |
| Technical Architecture (25%) | Integration API (10%) | Well-documented RESTful API for integration with ERP and marketing automation platforms. | 5 ▴ Extensive, well-documented API with high rate limits. 3 ▴ Basic API covering key objects. 1 ▴ No public API. |
| Vendor Viability & Support (15%) | Implementation Support (10%) | Availability of dedicated implementation team, training programs, and data migration support. | 5 ▴ Dedicated project manager and comprehensive support included. 3 ▴ Standard support package. 1 ▴ Self-service only. |
| Total Cost of Ownership (20%) | 5-Year TCO (20%) | Includes licensing, implementation, training, support, and integration costs over five years. | 5 ▴ Lowest TCO. 3 ▴ Mid-range TCO. 1 ▴ Highest TCO. (Scoring is relative to other proposals). |

![A sleek, institutional-grade system processes a dynamic stream of market microstructure data, projecting a high-fidelity execution pathway for digital asset derivatives. This represents a private quotation RFQ protocol, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study in Practice

Consider a mid-sized manufacturing firm, “MechanoCorp,” seeking to procure a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The project sponsor, the COO, is focused on improving operational efficiency across the board. The Head of Manufacturing (an end-user) is primarily concerned with inventory management and production scheduling features. The CFO (a high-power, low-interest stakeholder) is focused on keeping the project within a strict budget and ensuring a rapid return on investment.

The CIO is adamant about a cloud-native solution that integrates seamlessly with their existing data analytics platform. In the initial, unstructured discussions, these priorities were in conflict. The most feature-rich systems desired by Manufacturing were prohibitively expensive for the CFO, and the most affordable systems lacked the modern API the CIO required.

By implementing the operational playbook, MechanoCorp established a cross-functional team. In the criteria weighting workshop, the conflict came to a head. The Head of Manufacturing argued for a 50% weight on Functional Capabilities. The CFO pushed for 50% on Cost.

The CIO wanted 40% on Technical Architecture. The facilitator guided them back to the project’s chartered goal ▴ “To create a single source of truth for operational data to improve on-time delivery by 15% within two years.” This reframing forced a compromise. They collectively realized that without strong technical integration, the data could not be trusted. Without key manufacturing features, the efficiency gains were impossible.

And without respecting the budget, the project would not be approved. After intense negotiation, they settled on a balanced weighting ▴ Functional 35%, Technical 30%, Cost 25%, and Vendor Support 10%. This set of criteria, born from a structured and collaborative process, led them to select a vendor that offered a strong balance of all four aspects. The resulting implementation was successful because it was built on a foundation of shared understanding and compromise, a direct result of systematic stakeholder engagement in defining the very terms of the evaluation.

![Abstract visual representing an advanced RFQ system for institutional digital asset derivatives. It depicts a central principal platform orchestrating algorithmic execution across diverse liquidity pools, facilitating precise market microstructure interactions for best execution and potential atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-platform-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem.jpg)

## References

- Bourne, Lynda. _Stakeholder Relationship Management ▴ A Maturity Model for Organisational Implementation_. Gower Publishing, Ltd. 2009.

- Freeman, R. Edward. _Strategic Management ▴ A Stakeholder Approach_. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

- Mendelow, Aubrey L. “Environmental scanning ▴ The impact of the stakeholder concept.” _Proceedings of the second international conference on information systems_, Cambridge, MA. 1981.

- PMI (Project Management Institute). _A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)_. 7th ed. Project Management Institute, 2021.

- Schwalbe, Kathy. _Information Technology Project Management_. 9th ed. Cengage Learning, 2019.

- Tassabehji, Rana, and Andrew N. Ang. “The role of stakeholder engagement in sustainable procurement ▴ A systematic literature review.” _Journal of Cleaner Production_, vol. 263, 2020, p. 121439.

- Vaaland, T. I. and M. Heide. “Managing corporate social responsibility in a supply chain context.” _The International Journal of Logistics Management_, vol. 19, no. 1, 2008, pp. 79-102.

- Waxman, R. “A practical guide to stakeholder management in procurement.” _Journal of Public Procurement_, vol. 15, no. 2, 2015, pp. 185-211.

![A symmetrical, angular mechanism with illuminated internal components against a dark background, abstractly representing a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes the market microstructure and algorithmic trading precision essential for RFQ protocols, multi-leg spread strategies, and atomic settlement within a Principal OS framework, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Reflection

![A central star-like form with sharp, metallic spikes intersects four teal planes, on black. This signifies an RFQ Protocol's precise Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation, enabling Algorithmic Execution for Multi-Leg Spread strategies, mitigating Counterparty Risk, and optimizing Capital Efficiency for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-execution.jpg)

## From Procedure to Strategic Capability

Ultimately, the system for engaging stakeholders in the definition of RFP evaluation criteria is a microcosm of the organization’s overall strategic maturity. Viewing this process as a mere procedural hurdle is to miss its profound potential. The framework is not simply about selecting a vendor; it is about building a repeatable, high-fidelity system for making complex, high-stakes decisions.

The discipline required to map stakeholders, facilitate difficult conversations about priorities, and translate those conversations into a quantitative model builds institutional muscle. It creates a culture where decisions are made not based on the loudest voice or departmental power, but on a foundation of shared intelligence and a collective understanding of value.

The true output of this process is not the signed contract. It is the network of relationships, the shared language, and the analytical rigor that the process cultivates. An organization that masters this has developed more than a procurement best practice; it has engineered a core competitive advantage.

It has built an internal system for aligning its operational capabilities with its strategic intent, ensuring that every significant investment is a precise and powerful step toward achieving its most important goals. The question then becomes, how is this decision-making architecture maintained, refined, and deployed for the next strategic challenge?

![Sleek, interconnected metallic components with glowing blue accents depict a sophisticated institutional trading platform. A central element and button signify high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/stakeholder-engagement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms, symbolizing bilateral quotation and multi-leg spread components, precisely interact with robust institutional-grade infrastructure. This represents a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating high-fidelity execution via an RFQ workflow, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-infrastructure.jpg)

## Stakeholder Engagement

Meaning ▴ Stakeholder Engagement defines the structured and continuous interaction protocol between an institutional entity and its critical external and internal constituents, encompassing liquidity providers, custodians, regulators, and internal risk teams, for the explicit purpose of aligning objectives and optimizing systemic performance within the complex digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise metallic central hub with sharp, grey angular blades signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing. Intersecting transparent teal planes represent layered liquidity pools and multi-leg spread structures, illustrating complex market microstructure for efficient price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-across-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation Criteria define the structured framework employed by institutional entities to systematically assess vendor proposals for complex technology and service procurements, particularly within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives infrastructure, ensuring precise alignment with defined operational requirements and strategic objectives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/stakeholder-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic cross-structure, embodying an RFQ engine's market microstructure, showcases diverse elements. One granular arm signifies aggregated liquidity pools and latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-microstructure-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Stakeholder Analysis

Meaning ▴ Stakeholder Analysis represents a structured systemic process for identifying individuals, groups, or organizations that can affect or be affected by a specific project, system implementation, or strategic initiative within the institutional digital asset derivatives landscape. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic control mechanism with a luminous teal-accented sphere symbolizes high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its robust design represents Prime RFQ infrastructure enabling RFQ protocols for optimal price discovery, liquidity aggregation, and low-latency connectivity in algorithmic trading environments](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-control-for-optimal-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Technical Architecture

Meaning ▴ Technical Architecture is the foundational blueprint for a system, detailing its components, their interactions, and the principles guiding its construction for specific functional and non-functional requirements. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek conduit, embodying an RFQ protocol and smart order routing, connects two distinct, semi-spherical liquidity pools. Its transparent core signifies an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-bridging-diverse-liquidity-pools-via-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cross-functional-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Metallic hub with radiating arms divides distinct quadrants. This abstractly depicts a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Cross-Functional Team

Meaning ▴ A Cross-Functional Team represents a deliberately assembled operational construct comprising individuals from distinct functional domains, each contributing specialized expertise towards a shared, complex objective within an institutional framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/needs-assessment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A symmetrical, star-shaped Prime RFQ engine with four translucent blades symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and diverse liquidity pools. Its central core represents price discovery for aggregated inquiry, ensuring high-fidelity execution within a secure market microstructure via smart order routing for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-1.jpg)

## Needs Assessment

Meaning ▴ A Needs Assessment constitutes a systematic, data-driven process engineered to precisely identify and quantify the discrepancies between an existing operational state and a desired future state within an institutional context. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![This visual represents an advanced Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. A foundational liquidity pool seamlessly integrates dark pool capabilities for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-crypto-derivatives-os-rfq-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric represents a meticulously structured evaluation framework, comprising a defined set of criteria and associated weighting mechanisms, employed to objectively assess the performance, compliance, or quality of a system, process, or entity, often within the rigorous context of institutional digital asset operations or algorithmic execution performance assessment. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/), [Total Cost](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [Power-Interest Grid](https://options.greeks.live/area/power-interest-grid/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [Stakeholder Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/stakeholder-analysis/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in the Evaluation Criteria between the Rfp and Rfq Phases?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-evaluation-criteria-between-the-rfp-and-rfq-phases/)
![A dark, precision-engineered module with raised circular elements integrates with a smooth beige housing. It signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols, ensuring robust price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-system-core-high-speed-price-discovery-module.jpg)

An RFP's evaluation criteria assess a vendor's holistic value and problem-solving capability; an RFQ's criteria measure price for a known item.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Designing Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-designing-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

Designing RFP evaluation criteria is a strategic modeling exercise to predict long-term partner value, not just a procurement checklist.

- 
### [How Should the Weighting of Evaluation Criteria Differ between Technical and Commercial Aspects of an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-technical-and-commercial-aspects-of-an-rfp/)
![A sophisticated mechanism features a segmented disc, indicating dynamic market microstructure and liquidity pool partitioning. This system visually represents an RFQ protocol's price discovery process, crucial for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives and managing counterparty risk within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria is the strategic calibration of a value-assessment system, balancing technical capability against economic sustainability.

- 
### [Why Is It Important to Establish Clear RFP Evaluation Criteria before Issuing the Request?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-is-it-important-to-establish-clear-rfp-evaluation-criteria-before-issuing-the-request/)
![An abstract metallic circular interface with intricate patterns visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol for block trade execution. A central pivot holds a golden pointer with a transparent liquidity pool sphere and a blue pointer, depicting market microstructure optimization and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

Clear RFP evaluation criteria transform procurement from a subjective contest into a defensible, strategic system design.

- 
### [How Should the Weighting of Rfp Evaluation Criteria Differ between a Commodity Purchase and a Strategic Partnership?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-rfp-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-a-commodity-purchase-and-a-strategic-partnership/)
![Abstract geometric representation of an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Two distinct segments symbolize cross-market liquidity pools and order book dynamics. A central, illuminated conduit signifies high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within a Principal's operational framework, optimizing block trade settlement and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-2.jpg)

RFP weighting for commodities prioritizes cost efficiency, while for strategic partnerships it models long-term value co-creation.

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Reconcile Conflicting Priorities among RFP Stakeholders?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-reconcile-conflicting-priorities-among-rfp-stakeholders/)
![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

Reconciling RFP priorities requires engineering a data-driven decision framework that translates stakeholder inputs into a single, optimal outcome.

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Assign Weights to Different Rfp Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-assign-weights-to-different-rfp-criteria/)
![A sleek, dark sphere, symbolizing the Intelligence Layer of a Prime RFQ, rests on a sophisticated institutional grade platform. Its surface displays volatility surface data, hinting at quantitative analysis for digital asset derivatives. Precision mechanisms suggest RFQ protocol engagement enabling high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-intelligence-layer-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Assigning weights to RFP criteria is a systematic process of prioritizing requirements to ensure a data-driven and strategically aligned vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Price-Centric and a Value-Driven Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-price-centric-and-a-value-driven-rfp-evaluation/)
![Symmetrical precision modules around a central hub represent a Principal-led RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and block trade aggregation within a robust market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and capital efficiency via a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-led-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

A price-centric RFP evaluation minimizes initial cost; a value-driven model maximizes long-term strategic capability and worth.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Price Weighting to Use in a Complex Service Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-price-weighting-to-use-in-a-complex-service-rfp/)
![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

The optimal price weighting in a complex service RFP is a dynamic output of a valuation system designed to reflect strategic priorities.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Is the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Defining RFP Evaluation Criteria?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-stakeholder-engagement-in-defining-rfp-evaluation-criteria/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-stakeholder-engagement-in-defining-rfp-evaluation-criteria/"
    },
    "headline": "What Is the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Defining RFP Evaluation Criteria? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Stakeholder engagement transforms diverse operational needs into a unified, data-driven logic for strategic vendor selection. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-stakeholder-engagement-in-defining-rfp-evaluation-criteria/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T22:20:31+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T22:20:41+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "The image presents a sophisticated, modular digital asset derivatives execution system, its white protective shell partially retracted to reveal a dynamic teal component and internal high-fidelity mechanisms. This visual metaphor represents a Principal's operational framework leveraging an RFQ protocol for optimal price discovery and smart order routing across diverse liquidity pools. It embodies capital efficiency, mitigating adverse selection and latency for institutional-grade multi-leg spread execution, powered by an advanced Intelligence Layer within the Prime RFQ."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Cross-Functional Team",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Mendelow's Matrix",
        "Needs Assessment",
        "Power-Interest Grid",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Project Management",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Stakeholder Analysis",
        "Stakeholder Engagement",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Technical Architecture",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-stakeholder-engagement-in-defining-rfp-evaluation-criteria/
